Retired child and adolescent psychiatrist and American expatriate in New Zealand. In 2002, I made the difficult decision to close my 25-year Seattle practice after 15 years of covert FBI harassment. I describe the unrelenting phone harassment, illegal break-ins and six attempts on my life in my 2010 book The Most Revolutionary Act: Memoir of an American Refugee.
The mainstream media is working overtime to avoid any mention that a Covid vaccine played any part in the NFL’s Damar Hamlin’s cardiac arrest. Their established narrative lays blame on a “blow to his chest” as the cause for his heart attack during the 1st quarter of Monday’s game. This explanation is a deliberate attempt to keep the “V” word out of any Hamlin discussions.
Just a few days ago former NBA Utah Jazz legend John Stockton said “I think it’s highly recorded now, there’s 150 I believe now, over 100 professional athletes dead, in the prime of their life, dropping dead that are vaccinated. I had the proof in my hands, the names… I think it’s in the thousands now. Don’t quote me on that”. The media attacked Stockton to ridicule and debunk his statement. In January 2021, even Senator Ron Johnson noticed this issue. Johnson said: “Athletes are dropping dead on the field after receiving the COVID-19 vaccination”. It was just a matter of time before this happened in the NFL.
The investigating team GoodScienceing documented an astonishing 1,114 athletes who died from cardiac arrest since Covid vaccines were released. Years ago the Olympic Committee studied a 38 year period (1966-2004) and found on average, 29 athletes die per year. In December 2021 an Austria outlet compiled a list of 75 athletes who died over 5 months. Fact Checkers attacked Senator Johnson, both of these organizations, and anyone else looking into athlete collapses and deaths. Checkers typically say “there’s no proof they died from the vaccine”, which is true. Very rarely is a strict examination or detailed autopsy conducted on these athletes.
Steve Doocey on FOX News said, “He took a hit to the heart area.” Doocey suggests the impact on his heart area is why it stopped. To build up this narrative, FOX brings on two doctors and a cardiologist. None of them mention vaccines. The first doctor says “the blow to the chest caused an arrhythmia.” University of Pittsburg Medical Center cardiologist Dr. Bryan Donohue says “the helmet contact to the chest, at just the right time, and just the right location, caused a commotion to the heart”. Why have we not see this more often in the NFL? Donohue has ties to the NFL through UPMC Dr. Joseph Maroon, who worked for the Steelers and the NFL.
There are roughly 65 plays in every one of the 272 regular season NFL games. Let’s assume at least 2 players face a major impact on each play. This means roughly 35,300 impacts are in every NFL season. But there have only been two cardiac arrests in the history of NFL games. One was due to a spinal cord injury, the other was 51 years ago. In 1971 Detroit Lions Chuck Hughes caught the ball and was hit by two opposing players. Mr. Hughes is the only NFL player to die during a game.
With roughly 1.7 million player hits in the NFL over the last 50 years, why have we never seen an “arrhythmia” cardiac arrest before?
Established sportscaster Jim Gray said: “You don’t get on the field unless you are in good shape. If there’s some kind of medical condition, it would have turned up during his career”. Gray is suggesting the NFL look at Hamlin’s recent medical history, which would include the Covid vaccines. Additionally, the chest protectors used by NFL Defensive Backs distribute a frontal impact across the entire front of the body, including the shoulders. The pads have a solid front. The Douglas models have an Air-Management Main Body cushion system for dispersing the energy of big hits.
Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the world’s leading cardiologists, and the Chief Scientific Officer for The Wellness Company requested Damar Hamlin’s vaccination history as part of any investigation into this tragedy.
Last night on Tucker Carlson Tonight (FOX News) I told America that there is a building public health obligation to disclose what happened in a case of cardiac arrest and sudden death when it is unexpected with no antecedent disease.
I walked Tucker through the differential diagnosis and concluded that in the case of Damar Hamlin, that COVID-19 vaccine-induced subclinical myocarditis and then arrhythmic cardiac arrest on the field was at the top of the list. Tucker said that’s “fair.”
I think it’s more than fair since the NFL had a COVID-19 vaccine mandate, as did the military, many corporations, universities, and schools. If an EUA vaccine is mandated, then those who have imposed this product on their players, employees, and students have an ethical public health obligation to tell the world what has happened as a result of the mandate and help all those impacted brace for what could happen next.
Damar Hamlin is not just another “unexplained sudden adult death syndrome” case. It was “prime time” for the NFL and now “truth time” for the family, Buffalo Bills doctors, and the University of Cincinnati Medical Center staff. Did he take the vaccine, brand, and doses given? Is the clinical evaluation consistent with COVID-19 vaccine induced subclinical myocardits and resuscitated cardiac arrest?
If not, what is the proven cause of his calamity (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, anomalous coronary arteries, catecholaminergic ventricular tachycardia, long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, pulmonary embolus, spinal cord/intracranial injury, etc.).
I anticipate Hamlin will neurologically recover and come off the mechanical ventilator, so it is possible that the moral obligation of disclosure will be in his hands at some point in the future. Likely is NFL career has ended, an ICD will be implanted, but a new mission in public health may lie in front of him. We pray for his swift and full recovery in the hands of excellent medical staff and the support of his family and team.
Let’s get right to the crux of one of the worst sporting tragedies in recent memory and especially so given the context of a highly anticipated Monday night NFL game, which is averaging 14.8 million viewers in 2022: If Damar Hamlin were NOT vaccinated/boosted for COVID-19, it would be plastered all over every newscast and newspaper in America. But that is NOT not the case. What does that tell us? It says that what they’re not saying speaks volumes.
[…]
Perhaps most concerning and to my point is that federal authorities have converged on Hamlin’s hospital. Narrative and unavoidable fall-out control is important and those feds have a job to do. That’s sinister.
Importantly, I’m not a physician but I’m uniquely qualified to write this article for several reasons.
For one, I spent five years of my professional career investigating fraud and other cases such as injury, significant injury and death for law firms and insurance companies.
[…]
For another, I began coaching football in 1993 and have been deeply involved in the sport with exposure at the highest levels including serving as head coach at several large and high profile high schools and as an assistant coach for the same. As a head coach, several then current and former NFL players worked on my staff as assistant coaches. The work included regular partnership with the NFL and the Indianapolis Colts for things such as hosting and running youth camps for them.
[…]
We have this post below pertaining to Hamlin’s vaccination/booster status but it’s not free of controversy. Gateway Pundit has reported on problematic aspects of it beyond the peculiarities of the verbiage and the timing of it; ergo, we take it with a grain of salt.
Therefore and given that Hamlin was drafted out of Pitt in April 2021, I ran down Pitt’s COVID-19 policies and therein, the COVID-19 timeline becomes problematic. By April of 2021, full FDA approval for COVID vaccines was still pending and therefore, Pitt was only engaged in a very heavy influence and promotion campaign resting on Emergency Use Authorization. Pitt did not make COVID vaccines mandatory [exemptions available] until December 2021 after Hamlin had already entered the NFL. All of Pitt’s COVID advisories can be read here.
Logical deduction applies to a suspected but pending confirmation of Hamlin’s vaccine status.
[…]
Remember that Cole Beasely became a highly controversial Bills player and it was entirely over his approach to the NFL’s vaccination and general policies/protocol for COVID-19. It made national headlines meaning that it drew heavy media attention. This made COVID vaccination an even more sensitive issue for the Bills and so why would the team intentionally draft an unvaccinated player to exacerbate an already significant problem; especially if they gave fidelity to bad science, bad medicine, bad advisement and bad policy in belief that the league’s vaccination requirements were beneficial to all players’ health? A draft pick is a heavy investment for a team so why would it draft an unvaccinated player in these circumstances? It wouldn’t.
The aggregate of the admittedly problematic Dr. Eidelman post, Pitt’s initial posture on and campaign for vaccinations and the aspects of Hamlin’s drafting by the Bills as I just outlined, combined with the elephant in the room that no one will address, tells us that with near certainty Hamlin was vaccinated/boosted. It’s why everyone refuses to discuss it and those who do are once again attacked and branded conspiracy theorists.
This is why federal authorities have converged on Hamlin’s hospital – to control the narrative and fallout from an unavoidable injury, a likely permanent and significant disability, and a potential death that was likely caused by cardiac arrest induced by COVID-19 vaccination. Moreover, here is a table of other children and adults in their health and athletic primes that faced the same or similar cardiac outcome as Hamlin. It all makes the disinformation being proffered about commotio cortis as the likely cause of Hamlin’s cardiac arrest absolute garbage and I’m going to entirely eviscerate that nonsense in the rest of this article; and definitively if not authoritatively so.
The Mechanics of Hamlin’s Contact and Tackle
Let’s begin with the mechanics of Damar Hamlin’s contact and tackle. In my professional career as a coach observing countless hours of games, practice, film and televised games at all levels, I will tell definitively and without a single grain of doubt that Hamlin’s contact before his collapse was routine and benign for the violent collision sport of football. There was nothing anomalous or severe about it and it doesn’t comport with commotio cortis as I will prove. Observe:
[…]
Evidenced Conclusions
Relative to our examination of the mechanics of Hamlin’s contact overlaid by the medical and scientific information on commotio cortis from the NIH, the evidenced conclusions are itemized:
Hamlin’s presumed vaccinated/boosted status is most relevant.
Hamlin’s on-field contact was benign and not congruent with the forces necessary to trigger commotio cortis according to angles, contact points, contact object size, motion and forces.
By age, Hamlin is an outlier for typical commotio cortis.
As an adult, Hamlin’s thicker chest wall decreases the likelihood of him incurring commotio cortis.
Commotio cortis is a contentious subject not fully understood.
Commotio cortis overlays myocarditis relative to the myocardium and where myocarditis is directly correlated as a resulting condition; along with pericarditis and other cardiac aliments, from the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.
Hamlin’s contact was not directly over the heart in the anterior chest as required for commotio cortis.
The smaller and harder the contacting object is [a baseball, for example] as compounded by contact location [directly over the heart] and velocity [speeds of 30-40 mph so as to produce 50 joules], the greater the likelihood of commotio cortis occurring; and where in Hamlin’s case, the large padded shoulder surface in angular contact with Hamlin’s padded breast plate falls outside the parameters for commotio cortis as a plausible cause and diagnosis.
In cases of commotio cortis, sudden death and collapse are instant or occur after “several seconds” from the point of contact and this is anomalous to the evidenced mechanics of Hamlin’s contact, tackle and post-tackle. Immediately following contact, Hamlin actively engaged in “gator roll” technique, steered the ball carrier to the ground, came to rest on top of the ball carrier, came to all fours, stood up, disengaged from an opposing player, adjusted his facemask and then demonstrated the first indication of distress accounting for a nearly 5 second disparity. In the aggregate, these evidenced facts occur outside the scope for commotio cortis which entails “a sudden impact with the anterior chest overlying the heart, followed by immediate cardiac arrest.” Hamlin did not go into immediate cardiac arrest. Hamlin did not even demonstrate immediate distress. Rather Hamblin steered the ball carrier to the ground completing the tackle, took to his feet, adjusted his facemask and then began to show signs of distress before then collapsing.
Hamlin arrested twice as an indicator that his cardiac arrests were attributable to an ongoing condition such as myocarditis, pericarditis or another similar heart condition that are evidenced to result from COVID-19 vaccination and boosting rather than from any blunt force trauma as in the case with commotio cortis and where the mechanics of the tackle and post-tackle are further insufficient for that diagnosis.
Google has agreed to pay $9.5 million to settle a lawsuit brought by Washington DC Attorney General Karl Racine, who accused the company earlier this year of “deceiving users and invading their privacy.” Google has also agreed to change some of its practices, primarily concerning how it informs users about collecting, storing and using their location data.
“Google leads consumers to believe that consumers are in control of whether Google collects and retains information about their location and how that information is used,” the complaint, which Racine filed in January, read. “In reality, consumers who use Google products cannot prevent Google from collecting, storing and profiting from their location.”
Racine’s office also accused Google of employing “dark patterns,” which are design choices intended to deceive users into carrying out actions that don’t benefit them. Specifically, the AG’s office claimed that Google repeatedly prompted users to switch in location tracking in certain apps and informed them that certain features wouldn’t work properly if location tracking wasn’t on. Racine and his team found that location data wasn’t even needed for the app in question. They asserted that Google made it “impossible for users to opt out of having their location tracked.”
The $9.5 million payment is a paltry one for Google. Last quarter, it took parent company Alphabet under 20 minutes to make that much in revenue. The changes that the company will make to its practices as part of the settlement may have a bigger impact.
Folks who currently have certain location settings on will receive notifications telling them how they can disable each setting, delete the associated data and limit how long Google can keep that information. Users who set up a new Google account will be informed which location-related account settings are on by default and offered the chance to opt out.
Google will need to maintain a webpage that details its location data practices and policies. This will include ways for users to access their location settings and details about how each setting impacts Google’s collection, retention or use of location data.
Moreover, Google will be prevented from sharing a person’s precise location data with a third-party advertiser without the user’s explicit consent. The company will need to delete location data “that came from a device or from an IP address in web and app activity within 30 days” of obtaining the information
“Given the vast level of tracking and surveillance that technology companies can embed into their widely used products, it is only fair that consumers be informed of how important user data, including information about their every move, is gathered, tracked, and utilized by these companies,” Racine said in a statement. “Significantly, this resolution also provides users with the ability and choice to opt of being tracked, as well as restrict the manner in which user information may be shared with third parties.”
House Republicans plan to launch a subcommittee to expose collusion between federal agencies and private companies when they take power on Tuesday.
Currently named the “Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government,” GOP lawmakers will use their new House majority to examine how the intelligence community and federal law enforcement influenced corporate America to censor narratives and track citizens, according to a report in The Wall Street Journal.
Unlike a select committee, such as the one called by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) to examine the January 6 attack on the United States Capitol, a subcommittee has the power to consider and introduce legislation, raising the possibility of reforming a bureaucratic structure which many Republicans believe poses a threat to the system of checks and balances once central to the operation of the federal government.
The planned creation of the committee reflects a demand from House Republicans skeptical of House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) serving as the next Speaker of the House. Seven lawmakers requested a body styled after the Church Committee to consider federal abuses with investigative powers such as issuing subpoenas.
The Church Committee, a select committee formed by the Senate in 1975, exposed several controversial CIA operations, including the infiltration of civil rights organizations and efforts to plant assets in foreign and domestic news outlets. Kimberly Strassel, the columnist at The Wall Street Journal who broke the news of the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, argued that the Church Committee “did far more harm than good” by “allowing the left to attack and undermine” the intelligence community.
The seven lawmakers also called on McCarthy, who is seeking the top office in the House of Representatives with a razor-thin majority, to only introduce single-issue bills and make serious efforts to limit federal spending.
The planned creation of the subcommittee occurs after Twitter CEO Elon Musk released a series of “Twitter Files” he said detailed coordinated efforts between federal agents and former executives of the social media company, which he acquired at the end of last year. There existed “an organized effort by representatives of the intelligence community” aimed at “senior executives at news and social media companies” to discredit “leaked information about Hunter Biden before and after it was published,” according to a release from independent journalist Michael Shellenberger, arguably impacting the outcome of the 2020 election.
The FBI paid Twitter more than $3.4 million for its “legal process response,” apparently referencing the time executives spent coordinating with the agency on discussing stories that agents wanted them to suppress.
Another release from investigative journalist Matt Taibbi publicized numerous emails between federal law enforcement agencies and company officials in which officials repeatedly flagged election-related posts from small accounts for the company to censor. The FBI responded to the release by stating that the agency “regularly engages with private sector entities to provide information specific to identified foreign malign influence actors’ subversive, undeclared, covert, or criminal activities.” Days later, a second statement from the FBI claimed that “conspiracy theorists and others are feeding the American public misinformation with the sole purpose of attempting to discredit the agency.”
Political commentator Kim Iversen reviewed the top news stories in 2022 that she said the mainstream media spun as conspiracy theories “simply for saying something that went against the establishment liberal orthodoxy.”
In a recent episode of “The Kim Iversen Show,” political commentator Kim Iversen reviewed the top 10 stories in 2022 that she said the mainstream media spun as “conspiracy theories” — but turned out to be true after all.
Iversen said the conspiracy theorist label was usually given “simply for saying something that went against the establishment liberal orthodoxy — not because it was quackery rooted in falsehoods.”
“The reality is, so many that they [the mainstream media] claim to be ‘conspiracy theories’ are actually true,” Iversen said, adding:
“Anytime someone’s labeled as a conspiracy theorist, it might just mean it’s time to actually investigate and look a little deeper into whatever it is they’re claiming because so often nowadays conspiracy theorists are not conspiracy theorists at all. They’re truth-tellers — fact-tellers, researchers — and they’re connecting the dots and getting a lot of things right.”
“Maybe we can make a New Year’s resolution to make 2023 the year of truth,” she suggested.
Here are some of the news stories Iversen highlighted as examples of mainstream media mixing up fiction with truth:
According to the media, Iversen said, the Trucker Freedom Convoy was “just a bunch of racist Texas right-wing terrorists” and the protest was “filled with a bunch of Trump-loving White Supremacists.”
“In reality,” she said, “the project was about stopping vaccine mandates.”
Iversen also pointed out that the movement began in Canada — “where people can’t even vote for Trump” — and was primarily organized by a woman, and garnered widespread support from people of all political persuasions.
The “Twitter files” revealed that “shadow banning” and other censorship tactics were conspiracy facts, not conspiracy theories.
Iversen showed a video clip of Twitter CEO Elon Musk commenting that so far, all the “conspiracy theories” people had about Twitter have turned out to be true — “if not more true than people thought.”
People who in 2020 said the COVID-19 lockdowns and mandates would “change the fabric of American Freedom by ushering in an unprecedented surveillance state” were labeled by the media as conspiracy theorists, Iversen said.
Yet now, Iversen pointed out, the mainstream media — such as The Associated Press — are reporting:
An @AP investigation has found that COVID-19 accelerated and normalized state surveillance and tracking tools that are now being used to investigate crime and harass marginalized communities. https://t.co/HGFpaPXQKTpic.twitter.com/IPWe2tDoR0
At the beginning of the pandemic, when Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche warned that imperfect and overused vaccines could lead to dangerous viral mutations, the idea was heavily censored on social media and Vanden Bossche was called a quack, Iversen said.
However, now the idea is being taken up by mainstream news, Iversen said, pointing to a Jan. 1 opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal that asks if vaccines are fueling new COVID-19 variants.
“You couldn’t ask this question two years ago,” Iversen added.
Iversen pointed out that the idea that COVID-19 could have originated in a laboratory was heavily maligned and censored, yet now there’s a “legitimate discussion” about a possible lab leak causing the pandemic.
“Not that we’re likely to find out the truth anytime soon,” she added,” but nonetheless the so-called ‘conspiracy theorists’ were vindicated once again.”
The mainstream media pushed the narrative that the COVID-19 vaccines were safe and effective with only minor side effects and anyone who believed otherwise was ridiculed and considered a pariah to society, Iversen said.
Big Pharma has now admitted, she emphasized, that their COVID-19 vaccines can cause serious blood clots, that they don’t stop transmission and that they “wear off in a matter of months.”
Iversen ended with “the big kahuna” of supposed “conspiracy theories” by asserting that the assassination of President John F. Kennedy was likely not committed by a “lone crazy gunman,” as has been circulated for the last 60 years.
“A trove of released documents indicate a much more complicated reality that includes the probable involvement of the CIA,” Iversen said.
More evidence of something we’ve known for decades; Oswald was a CIA asset. https://t.co/LsuN9W5kVa
Lecture 12: From Source to City – Ancient Water Supply Systems
Understanding Greek and Roman Technology: From the Catapult to the Pantheon
Dr Stephen Ressler (2013)
Film Review
Ressler begins with a explanation of the hydrological cycle, describing how groundwater accumulates in aquifers, which form springs where the aquifer intersects the earth’s surface. Wells, vertical shafts drilled into a aquifer, have been found on Cyprus dating from the 9th millenium BC.
The shaduf, the first mechanical lifting device to move water, originated in Egypt in 2000 BC. The first pulley used to help lift well water dates from 8th century BC.
Most ancient water public systems originate from springs. Cisterns, were which collect rainwater running off a roof or other surface, were a neolithic invention used when aquifers were too deep to make wells practical.
Assyria built the first large scale water systems in the 8th century BC for irrigation and human consumption. Combining dams with downhill channels stretching as far as 20 miles, this technology spread throughout the Middle East, Africa and Spain.
Typical Greek poleis grew up around a spring, with the poleis providing pumped spring water when private wells and cisterns were insufficient. Pipes used for this purposes were made from terracotta segments sealed with plaster and seated into a trench. A few Greek cities built reservoirs to collect spring water.
During the 6th century BC, the Greek island of Saomos built the first aqueduct (known as the Tunnel of Eupalinos) to transport spring water. It was 3400 foot long. The aqueducts built by the later Hellenistic empire were nearly as good as Roman ones. However without arch technology, they couldn’t be raised significantly above ground level.
Where an aqueduct had to cross a valley, Hellenistic engineers used a inverted siphon built of lead pipe. Ressler uses one of his scale models to demonstrate the engineering principles. The siphon works so long as long as the receiving tank is lower than the water source. There were a total of 20 inverted siphons in the Hellenistic Middle East.
The Romans also built inverted siphon aqueducts, although these are really hard to maintain owing to calcium carbonate buildup. With an open aqueduct, it’s easy to remove calcium deposits as they build up. However with closed pipes (as found in an inverted siphon), the entire pipe has to be removed once it becomes blocked.
*Hellenistic period covers the time in Mediterranean history after Classical Greece, between the death of Alexander the Great in 323 BC and the emergence of the Roman Empire in 27 BC.
Film can be viewed free with a library card on Kanopy.
A new Rasmussen Poll of Americans shows that the tide appears to be turning in public opinion regarding the cause of increased “sudden deaths,” with nearly half of Americans now stating that they believe the COVID-19 “vaccines” are responsible, and more than 25% saying that they believe they know someone who has died from the shots.
‘Died Suddenly’? More Than 1-in-4 Think Someone They Know Died From COVID-19 Vaccines
Nearly half of Americans think COVID-19 vaccines may be to blame for many unexplained deaths, and more than a quarter say someone they know could be among the victims.
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that (49%) of American Adults believe it is likely that side effects of COVID-19 vaccines have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths, including 28% who think it’s Very Likely.
Twenty-eight percent (28%) of adults say they personally know someone whose death they think may have been caused by side effects of COVID-19 vaccines, while 61% don’t and another 10% are not sure.
Forty-eight percent (48%) of Americans believe there are legitimate reasons to be concerned about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, while 37% think people who worry about vaccine safety are spreading conspiracy theories. Another 15% are not sure. (Full article.)
In an interview published last month (December, 2022), former NFL sideline reporter Michele Tafoya, who now has her own show based out of Minnesota titled “Sideline Sanity,” interviewed two former professional athletes who attained stardom in their respective sports: John Stockton who is a Hall of Fame NBA guard who played for the Utah Jazz, and Ken Reuttgers, the former center who played for the Green Bay Packers championship teams.
This is a great interview about how all three have endured ridicule and attacks for their stance on the COVID shots in the world of professional sports.
Ken Reuttgers has been featured with Senator Ron Johnson in going public with his wife’s crippling COVID-19 “vaccine” injuries, which obviously means they were pro-vaccine before she suffered from the shot.
John Stockton, on the other hand, makes it clear that “this is true with all vaccines” and that he knew about the danger of vaccines long before COVID hit, and was well prepared for the propaganda and fraud that unfolded with COVID.
This is a very important distinction to consider as the public continues to wake up regarding the criminal actions and fraud that have occurred with COVID-19 “vaccines.”
Stockton has kept a list of athletes who have dropped dead on the field after taking a COVID shot, and he said the total now is probably “in the thousands.”
While Ken Reuttgers and others like him add a valuable voice to this discussion, someone like John Stockton is in a much better position to discuss the larger issues involved in this fraud, and you can clearly see that in this interview as he explains that the larger issue today is not what side of the vaccine debate you are currently sitting on, but how Americans so freely gave up their freedoms due to the fear created by COVID.
He mentions how the World Health Organization, for example, is preparing their “Pandemic Treaty” that is being designed to override the sovereignty of the United States and other countries by developing a global response to future pandemics, and the use of a “vaccine passport” that will be required for international travel.
Michele Tafoya recalls how she simply asked a question on her Facebook Page one day, pointing to an article published that interviewed a credible medical doctor who explained that early treatment with existing drugs, like Hydroxychloroquine, was having great success in treating COVID patients. She simply asked: Why aren’t we listening to these doctors?
She recounts how she was vilified on Facebook, even by close friends and family members, simply for asking a question, which prompted her to leave Facebook for a while.
I think her most profound statement of the whole interview was: “We can’t forget what happened.”
Here is the whole interview which is still on YouTube without that many views. Let us know if it disappears and we will post a copy on our video channels.
Can we have a tally of how many ‘conspiracy theories’ actually become ‘true’ within a number of months?
The latest one appears in the WSJ – ‘Are Vaccines Fueling New Covid Variants? The virus appears to be evolving in ways that evade immunity.’
What is this blasphemy? These pharmaceutical products are a gift from the gods, surely they can’t be making things worse…like the conspiracy theorists said?
Allysia Finley, who wrote the article, begins by describing panic over the new Omicron variant – XBB. It is rapidly spreading across the U.S and whilst it is unlikely to be any more lethal, its mutations are evading antibodies. According to Ms. Finley, growing evidence also suggests that repeated vaccinations may make people more susceptible to XBB and fuelling it’s rapid evolution.
Who would have thought!? Certainly not the ‘conspiracy theorists’ who warned from the very beginning that training the immune system on a specific spike protein was not a clever idea. Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) and/or Original Antigenic Sin (OAS) were always a concern but apparently not to the big-brained scientists who know better than everyone else.
Who would have thought when we were reporting, over a year ago, on official UK data showing the jabbed were more likely to get infected!?
Along with ADE and OAS we also warned that mass vaccinating the entire world with a specific spike protein was not sensible. It creates an evolutionary pressure, encouraging the virus to mutate. And whilst with traditional vaccines or natural infection, your immune system is trained to recognise multiple parts of the virus, with specific spike protein training, once the virus has evolved, you are back to square one…if you are lucky, or square minus one hundred if you are not.
The WSJ quotes a study in the journal Nature from 19 December:
“Such rapid and simultaneous emergence of multiple variants with enormous growth advantages is unprecedented”. Under selective evolutionary pressures, the virus appears to have developed mutations that enable it to transmit more easily and escape antibodies elicited by vaccines and prior infection.
According to the study, the virus is mutating to also escape antibodies elicited by prior infection but as noted above, natural infection should have trained the immune system to also create antibodies against other parts of the virus. Therefore, whilst it is possible that the virus mutates to completely evade natural infection immunity, it is more likely that a previously naturally infected individual will still have sufficient protection.
“The same study posits that immune imprinting may be contributing to the viral evolution. Vaccines do a good job of training the immune system to remember and knock out the original Wuhan variant. But when new and markedly different strains come along, the immune system responds less effectively”.
…
XBB has evolved to elude antibodies induced by the vaccines and breakthrough infections. Hence, the Nature study suggests, “current herd immunity and BA.5 vaccine boosters may not efficiently prevent the infection of Omicron convergent variants.”
I don’t want to keep saying “I told you so”, but it is so frustrating to read.
A New England Journal of Medicine study published last month provides more evidence of the vulnerability caused by immune imprinting. Neutralizing antibodies of people who had received the bivalent were 26 times as high against the original Wuhan variant as they were against XBB and four times as high as they were against Omicron and the BA.5 variant.
Similarly, a study this month in the journal Cell found that antibody levels of people who had received four shots were 145 times as high against the original Wuhan strain as the XBB variant. A bivalent booster only slightly increased antibodies against XBB.
And finally, after constantly being told that the ‘conspiracy theorists’ are spewing out disinformation, the tables are turned. The article says that experts claim the boosters improved protection against this latest variant but “that’s disinformation, to use their favored term”.
The WSJ article then looks at the Cleveland study which had been widely reported on in recent weeks.
Notably, workers who had received more doses were at higher risk of getting sick. Those who received three more doses were 3.4 times as likely to get infected as the unvaccinated, while those who received two were only 2.6 times as likely.
“This is not the only study to find a possible association with more prior vaccine doses and higher risk of COVID-19,” the authors noted. “We still have a lot to learn about protection from COVID-19 vaccination, and in addition to a vaccine’s effectiveness it is important to examine whether multiple vaccine doses given over time may not be having the beneficial effect that is generally assumed.”
Yep, you do still have a lot to learn, so maybe injecting half the world with something you know barely anything about was not the best idea.
The author of the WSJ article has clearly been red-pilled and has had enough with experts that don’t listen. “Experts refuse to concede that boosters have yielded diminishing benefits and may even have made individuals and the population as a whole more vulnerable to new variants like XBB”.
She points out the coincidences of the most vaccinated and boosted regions and countries having the biggest current Covid surges.
Fortunately, for now, younger people’s T-Cells are responsive enough to give enough protection. However, older individuals have weaker T-Cells, that get exhausted more quickly and so when antibodies no longer do their job, they are susceptible.
The article concludes with the question that should have been asked two years ago but wasn’t (well it was but only by ‘conspiracy theorists’).
The Biden administration’s monomaniacal focus on vaccines over new treatments has left the highest-risk Americans more vulnerable to new variants. Why doesn’t that seem to worry the experts?
It doesn’t worry experts because they are either too insulated in their little vaccine bubbles to realise what is happening or they know exactly what is happening but want to escape any blame.
However, judging by the comments, many people have cottoned on to what is happening and know exactly who is to blame.
Americans had lost nearly three years of life expectancy during 2020 and 2021. In 2019, the average life span of Americans of all ethnicities was 78.8 years. By the end of 2020, it had dropped to 77.0 years and by the end of 2021 it was 76.4
From 2020 to 2021, death rates increased for each age group 1 year and over. The age groups with the highest increases include working age adults, 25 to 54, and children under 4
The leading causes of death in 2021 were heart disease, cancer and COVID-19, all three of which were higher in 2021 than 2020. Unintentional injury and stroke also significantly increased in 2021
Heart disease, stroke and cancer are all now-known side effects of the COVID jabs. Unintentional injuries may also be due to the shots, as you may easily be injured if you pass out or suffer a heart attack or stroke while doing just about anything
If the COVID jabs worked, you’d expect excess mortality to drop, yet that’s not what we’re seeing. We’re also not seeing mass death from COVID. The only clear factor that might account for these discrepancies is mass injection with an experimental gene transfer technology
In August 2022, provisional life expectancy estimates1,2 for 2021 were released, showing Americans had lost nearly three years of life expectancy during 2020 and 2021. In December 2022, the finalized mortality report3 confirmed these shocking data.
Shocking Decline in US Life Expectancy
In 2019, the average life span of Americans of all ethnicities was 78.8 years.4 By the end of 2020, it had dropped to 77.0 years5 and by the end of 2021, it was 76.4.6 As detailed in the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s finalized mortality report for 2021:7
“In 2021, life expectancy at birth was 76.4 years for the total U.S. population — a decrease of 0.6 year from 77.0 years in 2020 … For males, life expectancy decreased 0.7 year from 74.2 in 2020 to 73.5 in 2021. For females, life expectancy decreased 0.6 year from 79.9 in 2020 to 79.3 in 2021 … From 2020 to 2021, death rates increased for each age group 1 year and over …”
As Virginia Commonwealth University professor of population health Dr. Steven Woolf told USA Today,8 “That means all the medical advances over the past quarter century have been erased.”
Life Expectancy Has Dropped Across All Age Groups
Age-specific rates of death increased across all age groups as follows:9
10.1% for age group 1–4 (from 22.7 deaths per 100,000 population in 2020 to 25.0 in 2021)
4.4% for 5–14 (13.7 to 14.3)
5.6% for 15–24 (84.2 to 88.9)
13.4% for 25–34 (159.5 to 180.8)
16.1% for 35–44 (248.0 to 287.9)
12.1% for 45–54 (473.5 to 531.0)
7.5% for 55–64 (1,038.9 to 1,117.1)
3.8% for 65–74 (2,072.3 to 2,151.3)
2.4% for 75–84 (4,997.0 to 5,119.4)
3.5% for 85 and over (15,210.9 to 15,743.3)
As you can see, something very strange is going on here. While life expectancy dropped across all age groups, the age groups with the highest increases in mortality were working age adults, 25 through 54, followed by children between the ages of 1 and 4.
What’s Killing Younger Americans?
The leading causes of death in 2021 were heart disease, cancer and COVID-19, all three of which were higher in 2021 than 2020.10 Unintentional injury and stroke also significantly increased in 2021.
Heart disease, stroke and cancer are all now-known side effects of the COVID jabs. Unintentional injuries may also be due to the shots, as you may easily be injured if you pass out or suffer a heart attack or stroke while doing just about anything.
Woolf, however, believes low COVID-19 jab rates and general poor health of Americans are to blame for the increased mortality. In addition to disregarding the fact that the primary causes of death are side effects of the COVID shots, working age adults and children are also, comparatively speaking, the healthiest groups in general and ought to have a lower risk of death from any cause, but especially heart disease and cancer.
And, since they have a far lower risk of dying from COVID in the first place (compared to the elderly), a slightly lower COVID jab rate in this age group is unlikely to have made such a huge difference.
According to CDC data,11 84% of 25- to 49-year-olds got at least one dose and 71% is considered “fully ‘vaccinated.'” In the 50 to 64 year category, it’s 95% and 83% respectively. In the 65 and over category, 95% got at least one dose and 93% are “fully ‘vaccinated,'” so it’s not like there’s a major difference in jab rates.
‘Sudden Death Syndrome’ May Be Driving Down Life Expectancy
COVID-19 is an unlikely cause for the rapid decline in life expectancy for the simple fact that it’s not a major contributor to rising excess mortality. Excess mortality is a statistic that is related to but separate from life expectancy.
It refers to the difference between the observed numbers of deaths (from all causes) during a given time, compared to the expected number of deaths based on historical norms, such as the previous five-year average. (Formula: reported deaths minus expected deaths equals excess deaths.)
Across the world, excess mortality has dramatically risen since the start of the pandemic, and barely a day now goes by without a healthy adult suddenly dropping dead with no apparent cause. People have died during live broadcasts, in the middle of speeches and during dinner.
Clearly, they were feeling well enough to go to work, to an event or a restaurant, and something caused them to instantaneously die without warning. These are the people making up these excess death statistics. They shouldn’t be dead, yet something took them out.
Excess Deaths Took Off After the COVID Jab Rollout
While COVID-positive deaths were part of the equation in 2020, excess deaths really took off after the rollout of the COVID jabs, not during the height of the pandemic as one would expect if COVID-19 was the real killer.12 Besides, we already know that “COVID-19 death” simply means that the person tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at the time of death or just prior to it.
For the U.S., there were 3,440,546 deaths of all ages for the year 2020.13 The expected numbers were 3,028,959, so that was an excess of 13.6% (411,587 above expected). In 2021, there were 3,459,496 deaths of all ages, which was 16.4% above expectations. As of mid-April 2022, the excess death rate was already at 14.1%, with 1,041,538 reported deaths of all ages.
If the COVID jabs worked, you’d expect excess mortality to drop, yet that’s not what we’re seeing. We’re also not seeing mass death from COVID. The only clear factor that might account for these discrepancies is mass injection with an experimental gene transfer technology.
More Working Age Adults Were Coerced Into Taking the Jab
Life insurance data confirm that it’s working age adults who are dying in record numbers, which is what’s really driving down life expectancy. In the third quarter of 2021, the death rate of working-age Americans (18 to 64) was 40% higher than prepandemic levels, and these deaths were, again, not attributed to COVID.
As noted by Dr. Robert Malone in a January 2022 Substack article,14 workers were forced to accept the toxic COVID jabs at a higher frequency relative to the general population. This, I believe, is the real answer to why they’re dying at a disproportionate rate.
As for children under 4, well, toxins tend to be more dangerous to younger children, so it’s no great shock that the death rate for children has risen more than the rate of older people. After all, we’re now giving these toxic COVID jabs to babies as young as 6 months old.
Data Manipulation Hides Real Cause of Death
As mentioned, the leading causes of death in 2021 were heart disease, cancer and COVID-19. Data analysis by The Ethical Skeptic15 — self-described as a former intelligence officer and strategist — shows cancer deaths are now being mislabeled as COVID deaths. The suspicion is that this is an effort to hide the fact that the COVID shots have resulted in soaring cancer rates.
Seven of the 11 International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes tracked by the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics — including cancer — saw sharp upticks starting in the first week of April 2021, which is when large swaths of the American population were getting their first COVID jabs.
According to The Ethical Skeptic’s analysis of U.S. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) data, the CDC has been filtering and redesignating cancer deaths as COVID deaths since Week 14 of 2021 to eliminate the cancer signal.16
The following two charts illustrate how cancer mortality is being artificially suppressed. As explained by The Ethical Skeptic:17,18
“The set dynamics are complex, but the principle is straightforward. When a death cert lists Cancer as the UCoD [underlying cause of death] and COVID as MCoD [main cause of death] — the UCoD & MCoD are being swapped, and COVID is being listed as the UCoD 100% (425/wk).
“This results in 20% of all COVID deaths each week, also happening to be persons dying of Cancer — which is egregiously higher than it should be. This is clear over-attribution = equates to exactly the difference between the Cancer and All Other ICD-10 code lag curves.”
The problem facing the CDC, is … What does one do when COVID Mortality is no longer substantial enough to conceal the excess Cancer Mortality?”
[…]
In the meantime, cancer is already one of the leading causes that is prematurely killing Americans, and uncontrollable turbo-charged cancers only started to occur after the rollout of the COVID jabs.20
Damar Hamlin
Established sportscaster Jim Gray said: “You don’t get on the field unless you are in good shape. If there’s some kind of medical condition, it would have turned up during his career”. Gray is suggesting the NFL look at Hamlin’s recent medical history, which would include the Covid vaccines. Additionally, the chest protectors used by NFL Defensive Backs distribute a frontal impact across the entire front of the body, including the shoulders. The pads have a solid front. The Douglas models have an Air-Management Main Body cushion system for dispersing the energy of big hits.
Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the world’s leading cardiologists, and the Chief Scientific Officer for The Wellness Company requested Damar Hamlin’s vaccination history as part of any investigation into this tragedy.
