Israeli newspaper contradicts White House, asserts Israel coordinated Iran strikes with US

Press TV

Israel coordinated its early morning strikes on positions inside Iranian territory with the United States, contrary to White House claims of non-involvement in the attacks, an Israeli newspaper says.

Israel Hayom on Monday cited an unnamed source as saying that Israel coordinated its attack on Iran with the United States.

This comes despite White House claims that the US was not involved in the early morning attack by the Zionist regime on positions in western and central Iran on Monday, escalating tensions in West Asia.

Israeli army radio, citing sources, reported that while the strikes on Iran were exclusively an Israeli operation, the United States assisted by intercepting some of the missiles.

The report came after Axios, citing a US military official, claimed that the American military did not participate in Israel’s aggression against Iran.

Axios, widely perceived and characterized by numerous sources as a media outlet with a strong pro-Israel bias, had reported that US President Donald Trump told it he would call Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and press him not to respond to Iran’s missile attack.

US Senator Chris Murphy said Israel humiliated Trump by launching strikes on Iran despite his call for restraint.

“This war has been humiliating for Trump and American power generally. And when Trump announces he is going to call Netanyahu and tell him not to retaliate, and within hours Netanyahu retaliates, the humiliation just compounds,” Murphy wrote on X.

According to reports, Trump had urged Netanyahu during a phone call on Sunday to refrain from further strikes, arguing that negotiations with Tehran were nearing a critical stage. Axios, citing a US official, reported that Trump told Netanyahu that “we are close to doing something good in terms of a deal.”

Financial markets reacted sharply to the latest escalation, with benchmark Brent crude futures rising more than 3% in early trading on Monday to move back above $96 per barrel. Investors remain concerned about potential disruptions to energy supplies from the region, particularly around the strategically important Strait of Hormuz.

The latest confrontation follows Israeli strikes on Beirut’s southern suburbs on Sunday, marking the first attack in the area since Washington unveiled a Lebanon truce proposal last week. Tehran has repeatedly linked any broader peace agreement with a sustained ceasefire in Lebanon.

On Sunday, Iranian armed forces launched a missile barrage at Israeli-occupied territories, responding to persistent Israeli attacks on Lebanon in breach of the ceasefire.

Sirens blared in wide areas, including the occupied Golan Heights, Tiberias, Safed, Nazareth, Haifa, and several other cities, according to Israeli media.

The Israeli military said air defense systems remain on high alert, while the regime’s education ministry announced the closure of all schools and educational centers for the coming day due to security conditions.

The Iranian operation came as a direct response to Israel’s continued aggression against Lebanon, including the use of banned phosphorus bombs and the targeting of Beirut’s southern suburbs of Dahiyeh.

Immediately after the retaliatory operation, Khatam al-Anbiya Headquarters, the central command of the Iranian armed forces, warned of more “crushing and remorseful blows” should Israeli attacks on Lebanon continue.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/06/08/770041/Israel-coordinated-attack-Iran-US,-Reports-says-contradicting-White-House-denial

IRGC hits Haifa industrial sites after Mahshahr petrochemical plant attacked

This file picture shows a view of the petrochemical plant in the port city of Haifa, the Israeli-occupied territories.

Press TV

The Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) has targeted industrial sites deep inside the Israeli-occupied territories with a barrage of ballistic missiles in direct retaliation for the Tel Aviv regime’s strikes on Iran’s petrochemical industry.

The IRGC Public Relations Department announced in a statement on Monday that the strikes hit petrochemical facilities in the port city of Haifa with missiles, in reprisal for a similar US-Israeli attack on the Karoun petrochemical plant in Iran’s strategic southern port city of Mahshahr.

The statement emphasized that the Zionist regime had “launched a dangerous game” by attacking civilian facilities and energy infrastructure of Iran.

It warned that strikes on Iran’s civilian infrastructure and energy facilities would expand the scope of retaliation, which will include all energy targets in the region.

The IRGC noted that the United States, as the main instigator of such a scenario, would then have to bear responsibility for all potential consequences that the global economy has to endure.

Earlier on Monday, local officials said the Karoun Petrochemical Company in Mahshahr came under an Israeli aerial attack, with projectiles striking parts of the facility and causing damage.

According to the Mahshahr Petrochemical Special Economic Zone Organization, emergency evacuation orders were issued for all daytime staff following a decision by civil defense and crisis management authorities, while operational personnel were instructed to continue work.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/06/08/770058/IRGC-targets-Haifa-industrial-sites-in-retaliation-for-Mahshahr-petchem-attack-

Yemen declares complete ban on Israeli navigation in Red Sea after missile strike on Tel Aviv

Spokesman for Yemen’s armed forces Yahya Saree

Press TV

Yemen’s Armed Forces have announced a complete and total ban on Israeli maritime navigation in the Red Sea, declaring all enemy movements “legitimate military targets” after claiming a precision missile strike on sensitive Israeli sites in Tel Aviv.

The announcement on Monday came as part of a broader confrontation against what Yemen described as “American and Zionist aggression” against the axis of resistance in Iran, Palestine, Lebanon, Iraq, and Yemen.

Spokesman Brigadier General Yahya Saree said the missile barrage targeted the occupied Yaffa region – Tel Aviv – and achieved its objectives with precision.

The operation, he said, was carried out in rejection of the Zionist project seeking to establish what is called “Greater Israel” under the name of a “New Middle East.”

It also aimed to break what Saree described as the “unjust and oppressive siege imposed by the American enemy” on the people of Yemen and the free nations of the axis in Lebanon, Gaza, and Iran.

The operation was conducted based on the principle of unified fronts and confronting enemies, Saree said, and in direct response to Zionist aggression against Lebanon, Iran, and Gaza.

‘We will respond to escalation with escalation’

In a declaration issued from Sana’a, the Yemeni Armed Forces affirmed three key positions.

First, Saree said, Yemen declares a complete and total ban on Israeli maritime navigation in the Red Sea, and from the moment of the statement’s issuance, all enemy movements will be considered legitimate military targets for Yemeni forces.

Second, Yemen will respond to escalation with escalation, and its military operations will intensify in accordance with field developments, the battle, and in conjunction with the axis of jihad and resistance, he added.

Third, Saree affirmed the right of the Yemeni people and the peoples of the free nation to confront American-Israeli aggression.

‘We will not stand idly by’

Saree emphasized that Yemen will not stand idly by in the face of the unjust siege imposed on its people and the peoples of the axis of jihad and resistance in Palestine, Gaza, Iran, Lebanon, and Iraq.

“All the enemy’s attempts will fail, Allah willing, and our operations will continue as long as the aggression and siege against us and the axis of jihad and resistance persist,” the spokesman said.

The statement underscored Yemen’s commitment to the unity of fronts alongside Iran, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and resistance factions in Palestine and Iraq, confronting what it terms the Zionist project and American hegemony across the region.

Earlier, Israel announced on Monday morning that a missile had been fired from Yemen toward the Israeli-occupied territories.

The developments were a direct response to the Israeli regime’s continued aggression against Lebanon, including the use of banned phosphorus bombs and the targeting of Beirut’s southern suburbs of Dahiyeh.

In a later statement, Yemen’s armed forces warned that they will close the Bab el-Mandeb Strait to American and European vessels if Washington and its European allies form a coalition in support of Israel and enter the war.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/06/08/770053/Yemen-impose-complete-ban-Israeli-navigation–Red-Sea

Flesh-eating parasite forces Canada to ban Texas livestock

Flesh-eating parasite forces Canada to ban Texas livestock

RT

Canada has temporarily banned imports of livestock, including horses, from the US state of Texas over the outbreak of screwworm fly, a flesh-eating and potentially deadly parasite.

The first case of screwworm was identified in Texas on Wednesday, marking the first detection of the parasite in the US, roughly 80km (50 miles) from the Mexican border. The outbreak began in Central America in 2023 and has been spreading steadily northward ever since. By late 2025, Mexico had reported thousands of cases in animals and dozens of humans.

The second case was identified on Friday in the same area, prompting Texas officials to declare a state of disaster over the outbreak. The same day, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency said it would temporarily halt imports of livestock from Texas until further notice and “continue to work closely with US counterparts to assess developments and adjust measures as needed.”

The ban applies to all livestock that originated from or were present in Texas during the three weeks prior to entering Canada.

Texas Governor Greg Abbott has condemned Ottawa’s move as an “overreaction” despite branding the outbreak an “imminent threat” as he declared a state of disaster.

“This pest affects live animals and does not impact inspected Texas beef. Canada’s broad restriction on Texas livestock is an overreaction that is more political than science-based,” the governor told USA Today in a statement.

The parasite, which in its adult form resembles a common housefly, lays its eggs into wounds and natural body openings of warm-blooded animals. The eggs – laid in hundreds by a single fly – hatch into parasitic maggots, which feast for about a week on living flesh, causing an extremely painful and potentially deadly condition. The maggots ultimately burrow out of the bodies of their hosts and dig into soil to pupate, emerging as an adult fly several weeks later to repeat the process.

The screwworm was declared eradicated in the US in 1966, in Mexico in 1991, and all across Central America by the mid-2000s. The program involved mass-breeding and release of sterile male flies into nature to destroy the population of the parasite. The resurgence of the fly in recent years has been attributed to changing weather and warmer temperatures, which are thought to drastically increase the range of the insects.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/641155-parasite-outbreak-texas-canada/

Evidence links microplastics to chronic disease

Story at-a-glance

  • Research links microplastic exposure to chronic diseases like high blood pressure, stroke, and diabetes, ranking among the top 10 predictors of these conditions
  • Communities with higher microplastic levels experienced significantly more chronic diseases, with risk steadily increasing alongside higher plastic concentrations
  • A study found microplastics embedded in artery plaque, and affected patients were over four times more likely to experience heart attacks, strokes, or death
  • Plastic particles trigger inflammation and immune responses when lodged in tissues, raising disease risk even in people without conventional risk factors
  • Effective ways to reduce exposure include filtering your drinking water, avoiding plastic food packaging, using glass containers, choosing natural fiber clothing and considering natural progesterone supplementation to address related hormone disruption

You’re absorbing plastic through the air, food and water daily. These microscopic plastic particles are being detected inside living tissue — lodged deep within organs, absorbed through your gut and circulating through your bloodstream.

Emerging research has uncovered strong connections between this plastic exposure and conditions like high blood pressure, stroke, and metabolic dysfunction. Studies now link even low-level, everyday exposure to a higher risk of cardiovascular events. This is no longer just about reducing waste. It’s about protecting your heart, your brain and your long-term health.

Microplastics Rank Among Top Predictors of Chronic Disease

Research presented at the American College of Cardiology’s Annual Scientific Session evaluated the concentration of microplastics in seafloor sediment across 555 U.S. coastal and lakeside census tracts between 2015 and 2019.1 The goal was to compare plastic exposure levels with disease rates in those same communities.

Using data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, researchers examined the prevalence of high blood pressure, diabetes, stroke, and cancer and used machine learning to assess how microplastic pollution stacked up against 154 other environmental and socioeconomic factors.

•People living near high-microplastic zones had more chronic illness — Communities exposed to higher microplastic levels experienced notably higher rates of noncommunicable diseases such as stroke, high blood pressure and diabetes. Researchers emphasized that these plastic particles were inhaled or ingested — not from unusual behaviors, but from basic day-to-day activities like drinking water, eating food, or simply breathing air.

•Microplastics ranked in the top 10 predictors of chronic disease — The study found that microplastics were among the top risk factors for chronic illness. For instance, microplastic exposure showed a strong correlation with stroke, placing it on par with other high-risk variables like racial minority status or lacking health insurance.

•More plastic meant more disease, showing a clear dose effect — The study revealed a dose-response pattern, meaning disease risk climbed steadily alongside higher plastic concentrations. Regions with very high microplastic levels — defined as over 40,000 particles per square meter of sediment — had the worst disease outcomes, while areas with under 200 particles had the lowest.

Plastics Create Long-Term Biological Stress

The researchers were surprised by how high microplastics ranked in the data. This finding pushed microplastics into the spotlight as a credible, under-recognized driver of modern disease — something your body could be reacting to daily.

•Plastic particles stay in your body — Microplastics are defined as fragments between 1 nanometer and 5 millimeters across. They come from common products: food packaging, building materials, clothing, and even cosmetics.

Unlike biodegradable materials, these particles don’t break down in your body. Instead, they can lodge in tissues or circulate in your blood, where they trigger immune responses, hormone disruption or low-grade inflammation — conditions tied to heart disease, insulin resistance and more.

•The researchers urged immediate steps to reduce environmental plastic load and minimize personal exposure — As lead study author Sai Rahul Ponnana, a research data scientist at Case Western Reserve School of Medicine in Ohio, put it, “Taking care of our environment means taking care of ourselves.”2

Plastics Buried in Your Arteries Silently Raise Your Heart Risks

A related study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found microplastics lodged in human artery plaque.3 Researchers analyzed plaque removed during surgery from patients with advanced carotid artery disease.

•They confirmed the presence of plastic compounds — This included varieties common in food containers, pipes and packaging. Out of 257 participants, 150 — over half — had detectable levels of these plastics embedded in their plaque.

•Those with plastic-laden plaque had far worse health outcomes — Patients who had plastics in their plaque were more than four times as likely to experience a heart attack, stroke, or die from any cause within the three-year follow-up period than patients with no detectable plastics.

•The researchers found jagged, foreign plastic fragments inside immune cells — The study also showed that these plastics had embedded deeply into tissue. Electron microscopy revealed sharp-edged particles wedged inside foam cells — immune cells that gather in artery walls during plaque formation.

Most particles were smaller than 1 micron — smaller than the width of a red blood cell — suggesting they were nanoplastics, which are even more dangerous because of their ability to penetrate cells.

Plastics Quietly Inflame Your Arteries

Researchers also found that the presence of plastics correlated with higher levels of certain inflammatory markers that are known to worsen vascular inflammation and increase the risk of sudden plaque rupture. This is what causes many heart attacks and strokes. Plastics also coincided with greater immune cell presence, meaning the body was actively responding to the foreign material like a chronic infection.

•Plastic particles were confirmed using chemical fingerprinting — Some particles gave off distinct chlorine signatures, confirming the presence of polyvinyl chloride (PVC). PVC is found in everything from plumbing pipes to credit cards — and its breakdown products are known endocrine disruptors.

•Even with no conventional risk factors, plastics still raised disease risk — The researchers adjusted for cholesterol, age, diabetes, body mass index, and blood pressure. Even after accounting for these common risk factors, plastics still predicted who got sick. This means even if you’re eating well and exercising, your exposure to plastic pollution could quietly undermine your heart health.

•Your daily environment is the source, and the damage adds up — The plastics detected in this study were the same types found in water bottles, food containers and many household products. The study didn’t find them in just one region — they appeared across multiple areas. This means plastic pollution is a widespread problem with personal health consequences. If it’s in your air, water and food, it’s likely getting into your bloodstream — and staying there.

[…]

Via https://www.activistpost.com/evidence-links-microplastics-to-chronic-disease/

 

Over 200 killed in US boat strikes: US service members have questions

USA Today

US boat strikes killed over 200 people. Service members have questions (archived)

Legal hotlines get calls from boat strike operators

Two organizations that provide anonymous legal advice for military members grappling with orders they fear are illegal said they had received calls from service members concerned about the legality of the boat strikes, some from people directly involved in them.

Steve Woolford, a resource counselor with Quaker House and the GI Rights Hotline, said he spoke with about four service members involved in the operation who were seeking legal and ethical guidance. One discussed helping plan a strike, and two others were ordered to execute strikes, he said.

“I think this is exactly what was described as a war crime,” Woolford said one caller told him.

Woolford said some of these callers were connected to lawyers, but he wasn’t aware of anyone who had refused an order or taken legal action. Callers are “more scared now that they’d be punished if they did bring something up,” he said.

Brenner Fissell, the vice president of the National Institute for Military Justice, said the Institute’s Orders Project, which also advises service members questioning if their orders are legal, receives a “steady but small number of calls,” including from service members concerned that the boat strikes are illegal, he said.

Some have expressed a “sense of being asked to do things that one is deeply conflicted with the morality of doing,” he said.

“There’s a general perception that no one is ever going to be prosecuted for this because Trump will be able to issue pardons preemptively,” he added.

If a service member refuses to follow an order, the case may be brought before a military judge to determine whether the order was lawful. However, before that call is made, service members could be removed from duty immediately.

Eugene Fidell, who teaches military law at Yale Law School, said the Pentagon could scrap any charges about illegal orders to strike boats if they arose through the military justice system.

Trump could also preemptively pardon service members for acts committed during his term. “The next administration might find its hands tied in terms of prosecuting anybody for obeying such an order, because President Trump may pardon everybody in sight,” Fidell said.

Service members who object to war based on their beliefs can seek conscientious objector status with the military and be released from deployment.

More than 100 people have contacted the Center on Conscience and War, a nonprofit that helps service members apply to file as conscientious objectors, since late February, according to Mike Prysner, the center’s director.

[…]

Via https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/06/06/us-trump-boat-strikes-death-toll/90376052007/

Mossad deputy chief ousted after Iran “regime change” failure

Uprooted Palestinians

The Mossad’s new director, Roman Gofman, announced on Saturday that the deputy director, A., was let go after 22 years of service to the organization.

“The head of the Mossad wished to express his deep appreciation to A. for his 22 years of operational service in the Mossad and his significant contribution to the security of the State of Israel,” read a statement shared by the Prime Minister’s Office. However, Israeli reports indicated that A. obtained a budget of around one billion Shekel and a team composed of hundreds to topple the Iranian regime, but failed to reach any outcome in this regard.

Gofman took office on Tuesday after being nominated for the position by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who had changing the Iranian regime as a main goal.

A is not the first Mossad official to be ousted or leave their position since Gofman was approved to fill the role.

Mossad’s head of international relations steps down after Gofman approval
On Monday, the head of Mossad’s international relations branch, “D,” stepped down from his position, according to a KAN News report.

KAN reported at the time that other officials were expected to follow suit in the coming days.

[…]

Via https://uprootedpalestinians.wordpress.com/2026/06/07/mossad-deputy-chief-ousted-after-iran-regime-change-failure/

The profound geopolitical implications of Iran’s strikes on Israel

By Trita Parsi | June 7, 2026

The magnitude of what just happened may take some time to sink in.

This is the first time Iran has struck Israel after Israel struck another country’s territory (that is, not Iran).

This means that the battle lines have been moved.

Iran’s deterrence had already been restored in the sense that Israel knew that any strike on it would be responded to.

But now, Iran has proven that it will also respond to Israeli strikes on Lebanon.

This is the first time in decades that a regional power has the means, capacity, and willingness to put hard power against Israeli military maneuvers or aggression against a third party.

This will be particularly significant since Trump has signalled that he seeks to restrain Israel from continuing the escalation.

Trump reportedly told Israeli journalist Barak Ravid that “Hopefully Israel is not going to retaliate. If Bibi strikes them back it’s just gonna keep going like the last 47 years, or the last 3000 years.” Trump also added: “We are very close to a final deal with Iran. It is going to be a good deal. I don’t want it to blow up because of what is happening now.”

Whether this would extend to Palestine is uncertain, but if it does, it may prove a game-changer.

Israel has been able to annex territory, commit genocide and war crimes without any real consequences because the West has refused to, and no regional power has had the hard power to impose costs on Israel.

If this equation changes, the future of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will likely take a significant turn.

Which is why Israel will do everything it can to disallow any shift.

From a US perspective, supporting Israel at this point recommits the US to its decades-long policy of seeking to sustain a balance in the region that allows for near-complete Israeli dominance.

That policy has been extremely costly to US interests, has destabilized the region, and enabled the Israelis to get increasingly aggressive and reckless (since they face no consequences for it).

However problematic it has been, it will become far more challenging and destabilizing going forward since sustaining Israel’s dominance will necessitate continued war with Iran. This clearly contradicts US interests.

If US interests were at the center of US policy, getting out of the Middle East and its regional rivalries would be a no-brainer.

[…]

Via https://tritaparsi.substack.com/p/the-profound-geopolitical-implications

Human Prehistory: Our Earliest Ancestors

PPT - THE STONE AGES & EARLY CULTURES PowerPoint Presentation, free ...

Episode 3 Our Earliest Ancestors

Human Prehistory and the First Civilizations

Dr Brian M Fagan (2003)

Film Review

2-3 million year ago, Homo habilis split off from other hominids to become Homo habilis. Although this species was still more ape-like than human, it could make tools (and didn’t become extinct like Australopithecus).

Louis and Mary Leakey discovered the first Homo habilis skeletons (dating from 2-2.6 million years ago) at Oldevai Gorge in the 1970s. They had lighter bones and thinner skulls than Australopithecus and were found with stone flake tools.

More recent Homo habilis skeletons date from 1.8 millions years ago. They were four foot three inches tall, probably weighed 88 pounds and had more rounded heads, larger brains, less prominent brows and jaws and more curved hands (with opposable thumbs) than Australopithecus. They had longer arms than modern human and probably climbed trees for safety.

The fossil record suggests hominids didn’t evolve slowly but in sudden bursts.

By 1.9 million years ago, early humans had a larger body mass and had much more difficulty climbing trees.

Bone studies from Olduvai Gorge suggest the earliest humans were expert scavengers and would steal lions’ leftover kill. They used the bone flakes they created as chopper tools for scraping meat and dismembering bones.

Similar bone flake tools from Gona date from 2.6 million years ago.

At Koobi Fira along Lake Terkana, antelope remains show evidence of being scavanged and butchered.

By one million years ago, stone tools had become much more standardized.

https://www.kanopy.com/en/pukeariki/watch/video/15061946/15061952

The Hidden Dangers of Antidepressants and Why It’s So Hard to Stop Taking Them

[…]

Whenever I ask a holistic physician which commonly used medication classes they believe cause the most harm to society, SSRIs always are one of the top five.

Note: Statins (discussed here), NSAIDS like ibuprofen (discussed here), and PPI acid reflux medications (discussed here) frequently make the top five as well.

This is because SSRIs rarely benefit patients (only a minority of depressed patients have a metabolic type that responds to SSRIs) and the drugs have a large number of severe and often life-changing side effects. For example, in a survey of 1,829 patients1 on antidepressants in New Zealand:

  • 62% reported sexual difficulties
  • 52% felt not like themselves
  • 47% had experienced agitation
  • 60% felt emotionally numb
  • 39% cared less about others
  • 39% had experienced suicidal ideation

Many of these can be immensely impactful for individuals (e.g., SSRI sexual dysfunction is often permanent and frequently causes severe depression, while emotional anesthesia takes away the joy of life and can cause people to spend years, if not decades, in emotionally toxic situations).

Worse still, the SSRIs are somewhat unique in that they can also harm those not taking the drugs as they can trigger psychotic violence, which results in either suicide, homicide, and tragically, in numerous cases, mass shootings (discussed further here). Furthermore, the pharmaceutical industry was aware of this from the start, but chose to conceal all that evidence to sell the drugs (and only revealed it after lawsuits forced them to).

Note: Another example of a pharmaceutical that harms others is the COVID vaccine as it causes certain recipients to shed the vaccine and then significantly harm those around them who are sensitive to shedding — to the point numerous sensitive readers have shared COVID vaccine shedding has greatly impacted their lives (discussed further here).

Maximizing Sales

Much of the medical industry’s appalling conduct makes sense once its actions are viewed through a business lens that seeks to maximize sales. This for instance, is why the SSRIs, rather than being outlawed, were able to become some of the most successful drugs in history (e.g., in 2027, they are projected to be an 18.27 billion dollar global market2) and why almost all of their appalling side effects have been hidden from the public. Let’s review some of those unconscionable tactics.

Sales Funnels

A classic principle in marketing is to cast as wide a net as possible for your customers and then gradually pull some of those customers into costlier and costlier products. Since funnels gradually shrink as you go further down them, similar to how fewer customers will buy a product as it becomes more expensive, this method is often referred to as a “sales funnel.” With the SSRIs, a robust sales funnel exists as:

  • Through years of almost unbelievable marketing (discussed further here), depression was redefined to include the normal negative emotions of life. As such, depression became so subjective it became possible to market it to most of the population and patients frequently will ask their doctors to prescribe SSRIs after they encounter an emotional obstacle.
  • Numerous mass screening programs exist for doctors to diagnose if someone is depressed (e.g., this is routinely done for pregnant women and the elderly).
  • Once a patient is “depressed,” rather than using natural approaches that effectively treat depression, the medical system will aggressively push them to start SSRIs.
  • The SSRIs frequently cause a variety of psychiatric issues which require taking even stronger psychiatric medications.

This skit for example illustrates many of the sad absurdities behind a common SSRI sales funnel used on pregnant women:

.

Watch on X

.

Bipolar Disorder — An Unintended Outcome

Since the SSRIs antidepressants are stimulants, they often trigger mania. In turn, one of the most common problems associated with their use is bipolar disorder (a disease where you alternate from a depressed to a manic state).

To put this into context, in 1955, 1 in 13,000 people were disabled for bipolar, and the majority of patients who presented to the hospital for a manic episode permanently recovered. Now, bipolar affects 1 in every 20 to 50 people, and 83% of them are severely impaired in some facet of their lives.3 A significant amount of data has linked bipolar disorder to SSRIs. For example:

  • Yale researchers reviewed the records of 87,290 patients diagnosed with depression or anxiety between 1997 and 2001 and determined those treated with antidepressants converted to bipolar at the rate of 7.7% per year (three times greater than the rate for those not exposed to the drugs), ultimately resulting in between 20% to 40% of depressed patients becoming bipolar.4
  • A survey found 60% of bipolar patients only developed their illness after receiving SSRIs for depression.5
  • Peter Breggin reported that of 184 patients in the hospital starting Prozac, Zoloft, or Paxil, 11 developed mania and 8 became psychotic, and in Yale, 8% of 533 consecutive admissions were for mania or psychosis caused by antidepressants, and two patients heard voices commanding them to kill themselves.6

Note: The psychiatric field gets around this issue by claiming SSRIs “unmask” latent bipolar a patient always had — even though it likely would have never been “unmasked” had they never taken the SSRI in the first place.

Likewise, since the advent of mass psychiatric medicating, the character of bipolar has changed, becoming much more complicated to treat, characterized by much more rapid cycling between the depressed and manic states, and much more likely to produce severe complications like dementia later on.

Unfortunately, when the foremost experts in bipolar disorder presented these findings at the American Psychiatric Association’s annual conference and urged caution in the over administration of SSRIs, they were met with boos from their increasingly upset audience.7

As such, the link between SSRIs and bipolar disorder is rarely focused on, and instead the dangers of bipolar disorder (e.g., being 4 to 6 times as likely to die prematurely8) are continually emphasized to justify treating it.

This is remarkable given that a strong case can be made that many of the disastrous complications of bipolar disorder result from the highly toxic antipsychotics the disorder is “treated” with, especially since those same drugs are often given to schizophrenic patients, a disorder characterized by similar long-term complications (that are rarely seen in countries which do not use the drugs9).

In short, a robust sales funnel exists to create lifelong psychiatric medication users, best demonstrated by the fact spending an ever increasing amount of money to “treat” mental illness has only resulted more of it.10

.

rising trends lifetime and current depression rate

.

Worse still, this sales funnel is particularly effective in capturing young adults who were raised in it (e.g., a recent post-COVID survey of those aged 18 to 24 found 42% had a mental health condition, including 37.8% with anxiety and 32.8% depression11) — and is particularly predatory towards young women:

.

common response hormonal changes

.

Customer Retention

Since SSRIs “treat” rather than “cure” depression, they typically are a lifelong prescription (which is great for sales). However, since SSRIs have so many intolerable side effects and rarely help those who use them, tactics need to be used to retain those customers and safeguard their recurring revenue.

For instance, patients will often be told (sometimes not only by a doctor but also by a judge) that they lack the judgment to understand their mental illness, and they must hence take the prescribed medication.

Likewise, physicians rarely recognize the adverse effects of SSRIs. Instead, they are often trained to attribute them to the patient’s pre-existing mental illness (which frequently leads to horrendous gaslighting and patients sometimes being forced to take the medications against their consent).

SSRI Withdrawals

Like many other stimulants, SSRIs can be extremely addictive. In fact, SSRIs have such a high risk for withdrawals that merely changing an existing dosage or accidentally missing a pill can be sufficient to trigger severe withdrawals (e.g., this has caused many SSRI suicides12).

Unfortunately, when this happens, rather than recognize that withdrawals are occurring, physicians typically interpret them to mean the SSRI was effectively treating a severe (pre-existing) mental illness — and thus must urgently be resumed, even though the “mental illness” the patient exhibits was not present prior to them initiating the SSRI.

Likewise, since so few physicians know how to recognize the signs of SSRI withdrawals, almost none know how to treat it. As a result, individuals experiencing SSRI withdrawals frequently make the horrifying discovery that the safety net they thought existed simply isn’t there (an experience which likewise has been shared by many of those who developed significant complications from the COVID-19 vaccines).

As such, many who experience these withdrawals are forced to resume the drugs (as this is often all doctors can offer those patients), thereby ensuring customer retention.

Effects of SSRI Withdrawals

When withdrawing from an SSRI, severe withdrawals (e.g., becoming suicidal or violently psychotic) can happen. As such, I always urge readers to be extremely cautious in how they stop the medications.

However, far more frequently, less severe (and often fluctuating) withdrawal symptoms also occur such as:Worse still, these reactions are very common (e.g., I know more people than I can count who’ve experienced brain zaps).

In fact, a recent meta-analysis found that 56% of patients who stop using SSRIs experience withdrawals, that 46% who stop an SSRI experience severe withdrawals, and that these withdrawals last for weeks to months.13 Additionally, it is well known in the SSRI recovery community that the risk of a withdrawal varies greatly depending on the drug (e.g., Paxil is notorious for causing withdrawals, Cymbalta is also a common offender).

Note: A 1996 door-to-door survey of 2003 randomly selected people in England found that 78% of them considered SSRIs to be addictive.14

The pharmaceutical industry is well aware of this, to the point they will often deliberately put “placebo” subjects in SSRI trials into withdrawals (by terminating their existing prescription) so they can make the drug group look “better” than the “placebo” patients.

Note: This is similar to how Merck hid Gardasil’s high rates of severe adverse reactions by using its toxic adjuvant (rather than saline) for the placebo group, resulting in similar injury rates in both groups, which, despite being extraordinarily high, went unquestioned by regulators.

Why Are SSRIs So Addictive?

For the roughly 50% of people who experience SSRI withdrawals, one of the most challenging things is how incredibly slowly they have to stop taking them. A major reason for this is due to the non-linear relationship between an SSRI dose and its binding to the brain.

[…]

Because of this, individuals seeking to quit SSRIs often have to go at an incredibly slow pace (e.g., in many cases, sandpaper is needed to slightly decrease the current dose, and it often takes years of daily work to withdraw from an SSRI). To make matters worse:

  • If one withdraws from an SSRI too quickly, the nervous system can become sensitized and require an even slower pace for subsequently weaning off an SSRI. Likewise, once sensitized, individuals can also have strong reactions to a variety of other things in their environment that did not previously affect the individual.
  • When withdrawing from an SSRI, the process (e.g., what gets better and what gets worse) can often come in chaotic and unpredictable waves.
  • In many cases, using a supplement concurrently can often significantly worsen the withdrawal process (as a result they have to be phased in very slowly).
  • Patients are normally put onto multiple addictive psychiatric medications concurrently, so to quit them, typically only one can be withdrawn from at a time, and a great deal of deliberation must go into which one that is.
  • Certain SSRIs can be so difficult to withdraw from it must instead be gradually replaced with another less addictive SSRI.

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/hidden-dangers-antidepressants-hard-stop-taking/5879420