Criminal Referral Requests Filed Against Fauci and Top COVID Officials in Seven States

Arizona and Pennsylvania join growing list as victims accuse federal health leaders of murder, assault, abuse, and medical terrorism over COVID-era policies.

On April 8, 2025, the Vires Law Group, in collaboration with the Former Feds Group Freedom Foundation, submitted formal criminal referral requests to the Attorneys General of Arizona and Pennsylvania. These filings urge state prosecutors to open criminal investigations into Dr. Anthony Fauci and other prominent public health and government officials for alleged crimes committed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The referrals are based on detailed evidence—including the stories of over 80 victims and families—and allege that policies such as lethal hospital protocols, the denial of life-saving treatments, and systemic medical coercion led to widespread injury and death.

Similar filings have been submitted on behalf of constituents in Florida, Louisiana, Texas, Missouri, and Oklahoma, marking a coordinated nationwide effort to pursue justice through state and local authorities:

Individuals Named in the Referral Requests:

  • Dr. Anthony Fauci – Former Director, NIAID
  • Dr. Cliff Lane – Deputy Director, NIAID
  • Dr. Francis Collins – Former Director, NIH
  • Dr. Deborah Birx – Former White House COVID Response Coordinator
  • Dr. Rochelle Walensky – Former Director, CDC
  • Dr. Stephen Hahn – Former Commissioner, FDA
  • Dr. Janet Woodcock – Principal Deputy Commissioner, FDA (Arizona only)
  • Dr. Peter Hotez – Dean, National School of Tropical Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (Arizona only)
  • Dr. Robert Redfield – Former Director, CDC
  • Dr. Peter Daszak – President, EcoHealth Alliance
  • Dr. Ralph Baric – Professor, University of North Carolina
  • Dr. Rick Bright – Former Director, BARDA
  • Administrators and healthcare providers at various hospital systems and care facilities in Arizona and Pennsylvania

Combined List of Alleged Crimes Across Both States:

  • Murder
  • Involuntary Manslaughter
  • Negligent Homicide
  • Assault / Aggravated Assault / Simple Assault
  • Recklessly Endangering Another Person
  • Vulnerable Adult Abuse / Emotional Abuse
  • Neglect and Abuse of a Care-Dependent Person
  • Kidnapping
  • Trafficking of Persons for Forced Labor or Services
  • Criminal Coercion to Restrict Another’s Freedom
  • Operating a Corrupt Organization
  • Violations of State Anti-Racketeering Laws
  • Terrorism

At the time of the release, two county-level criminal investigations are reportedly already underway in other states. The legal teams and victims involved assert that accountability must come through state or local prosecution, given the lack of federal action. These filings represent a significant national effort to seek justice on behalf of families who lost loved ones and were denied proper care during the pandemic.

[…]

Via https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-criminal-referral-requests

Historical Knowledge Suppressed: Cancer Treatment and Parasite Treatment

Parasites Cancer

Image captured for criticism/review and reporting current events under Fair Dealing – The Copyright Act 1994

By NZDSOS Media Team

Recently a two page CIA document declassified in 2011, “Biochemical Resemblance Between Endoparasites and Malignant Tumors”, has made headline news. It reveals research from as early as 1938 demonstrating similar metabolic pathways between endoparasites (that live inside host organisms) and malignant tumours, naming two compounds found to be effective against both.

Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher articulates the 50 year setback in cancer treatment research resulting from this decades-long information suppression. The cost is the health and lives of many millions, concurrent with intergenerational financial hardship to families in direct correlation with increased corporate profits.

Cancer and Parasites Are Not the Same Thing

Dr Paul Marik’s 2024 publication Cancer Care: The Role of Repurposed Drugs and Metabolic Interventions in Treating Cancer reviews the published literature on this subject. Importantly, he writes:

Although a number of antiparasitic drugs including ivermectin, mebendazole and niclosamide have proven anti-cancer effects it is important to recognize that cancer is NOT a parasitic disease as has been suggested in the “popular press” and by misguided clinicians. There is no evidence that cancer is caused by or related to any parasitic disease. These drugs act via specific biochemical pathways specific to the cancer cell which are distinct from their anti-parasitic mechanisms of action.

Evidence of Ongoing Medical Crimes

Classifying such potentially life saving information as a risk to national defense appears to be an early example of medical censorship protecting pharmaceutical industry profits, which intensified so aggressively in 2020. Thousands of doctors in New Zealand, Australia, the UK, Canada, the USA and beyond, now face public punishment should their actions threaten profit margins. Learn more at the World Council For Health’s webinar series, Punished for Protecting Patients (Part 1 and Part 2). We have written extensively about the origins of global censorship through corporatised centralisation of regulatory authorities, for example here, here and here.

Mechanisms of Action

Over 100 studies now demonstrate at least 20 mechanisms of action which probably make the covid-19 injections one of the largest carcinogenic exposures in history. We have also written about these multiple mechanisms, for example here, here and here.

Parasite Cancer mRNA Mechanisms
Image captured for criticism/review and reporting current events under Fair Dealing – The Copyright Act 1994

In the August 2025 publication of the Journal of Independent Medicine, Dr Paul Marik and Dr Justus Hope wrote:

The incidence of cancers has increased exponentially worldwide since the universal COVID-19 vaccination program began at the end of 2020. These cancers tend to present at an advanced stage, progress rapidly, and occur in younger patients. Additionally, some patients previously in remission have been reported to develop uncontrolled cancer relapses shortly after receiving a COVID-19 vaccination (usually a booster). The temporal association between these cancers and COVID-19 vaccination is undeniable. These observations have given rise to the term “turbo-cancers.”

It is an unlikely coincidence that in December 2023 Pfizer acquired Seagen Inc., “a global biotechnology company that discovers, develops and commercializes transformative cancer medicines.” Total purchase cost was US$43 billion for a company with an annual revenue of $2 billion in 2022. This infers insider trading by a company who knew that cancer was about to become highly lucrative business.

The Burgeoning Revolution in Cancer Treatment

Despite horrific levels of censorship being foisted upon scientific and medical communities, a medical revolution is skyrocketing thanks to the gallant efforts of defiant, competent and ethical trailblazers. The most astonishing reports to date have come from immunologist / oncologist Dr William Makis whose personal story embodies the backbone required against reprehensible medical crimes being normalised in health care systems at the cost of human health and life.

Parasite Cancer Makis Success
Image captured for criticism/review and reporting current events under Fair Dealing – The Copyright Act 1994

On 7 April 2026 a preprint study, Real-World Clinical Outcomes of Ivermectin and Mebendazole in Cancer Patients: Results from a Prospective Observational Cohort was published with extremely promising results. The researchers enrolled 197 patients with diverse clinical profiles, a median duration since diagnosis of 1.2 years, and almost 40% of whom had active disease progression at study initiation. Ivermectin and mebendazole were added to existing treatments which included 68.9% on conventional therapies (surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy). After six months, 32.8% of study participants reported no current evidence of disease; 15.6% reported disease regression; 36.1% reported stabilised disease; and 15.6% reported disease progression. Minimal side effects requiring minor dose adjustments were reported by 25.4%.

While these findings offer a compelling clinical signal for therapeutic benefit from these anti-parasitic medications, the authors acknowledge a number of study design limitations and argue for “Urgent prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials” to validate the results and optimise treatment doses.

Dr Joseph Ladapo, Surgeon General for the state of Florida, announced in October 2025 that his government have committed US$60 million for research into the use of repurposed antiparasitic drugs in cancer treatment. This appears to be in partnership with Dr Makis who spoke with journalist Kim Iversen on the subject in February 2025.

There are over 300 peer reviewed studies that have been published with ivermectin and cancer. Looking at the mechanisms of action … It’s acting on molecular pathways inside the cells, pathways that affect proliferation of cells … It can act on mechanisms of cancer metastasising for example … It goes after cancer stem cells … notoriously difficult to kill. In fact they may be the reason why … the majority of chemotherapy is palliative … Yet ivermectin is able to identify those cells, recognise that those cancer cells are different from normal cells and is able to kill them or inhibit them … This is a drug that’s been used around the world. Four billion doses given. Fifteen times safer than aspirin. 750 Times safer than remdesivir. And 17,000 times safer than covid vaccines.

[…]

Via https://nzdsos.com/2026/04/23/parasite-cancer-revolution/

BILL GATES VACCINE CARTEL HUNTING FARMERS IN FRANCE WITH THERMAL DRONES!

Seemorerocks

French skies are filled with surveillance drones scanning for “non-compliant” cattle… because brave farmers DARE to refuse the Gates-backed jab mandates.
Police raids in the dead of night. Herds cornered. Forced injections at gunpoint.

This isn’t public health.

This is biological warfare on your dinner plate.
They’re not just vaccinating animals — they’re poisoning the food chain, engineering dependency, and crushing anyone who stands in the way of total control over what ends up on your table.
Independent farms? Targeted.
Organic herds? Marked for destruction.
Farmers who say NO? Treated like terrorists.
While the mainstream cheers “food safety,” the real agenda is crystal clear: weaken the population, control the supply, and make sure every bite comes with their experimental cocktail.

The globalist machine doesn’t stop at humans anymore. Now they’re coming for the livestock… and by extension, YOU.

But there IS resistance rising.
In the shadows of this madness, true fighters are building unbreakable alternatives — decentralized, transparent, and outside their reach.

[…]

Via https://seemorerocks.substack.com/p/bill-gates-vaccine-cartel-is-hunting

United Arab Emirates will leave OPEC May 1

This is a locator map for United Arab Emirates with its capital, Abu Dhabi. (AP Photo)

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — The United Arab Emirates said Tuesday it will leave OPEC effective May 1, stripping the oil cartel of its third-largest producer and further weakening its leverage over global oil supplies and prices.

The UAE’s decision had been rumored as a possibility for some time, as it pushed back in recent years against OPEC production quotas it felt had been too low — meaning it wasn’t able to sell as much oil to the world as it had wanted.

“Having invested heavily in expanding energy production capacity in recent years, the bigger pictue is that the UAE has been itching to pump more oil,” Capital Economics wrote in an analysis. “The ties binding OPEC members together have loosened,” it said, particularly after Qatar withdrew from the cartel in 2019.

Regional politics are also likely at play. The UAE has had increasingly frosty relations with Saudi Arabia, OPEC’s largest producer, over political and economic matters in the Mideast, even after both came under attack by fellow OPEC member Iran during the war.

No immediate impact likely for world oil markets

The UAE’s withdrawal from OPEC won’t necessarily have any immediate effects in markets. That’s because world oil supplies are sharply constrained by the war in Iran, which has closed off the Strait of Hormuz, a waterway through which one-fifth of global oil supplies — including much of the UAE’s — is transported. On Tuesday, Brent crude, the international benchmark, traded above $111 a barrel, or more than 50% above its prewar price.

OPEC accounts for roughly 40% of the world’s oil output, but its market power had been waning in recent years as the United States ramped up production. While Saudi Arabia had been producing more than 10 million barrels of oil a day before the war, the U.S. pumps more than 13 million barrels a day.

U.S. President Donald Trump has been a steady critic of the cartel during his two terms in the White House.

The UAE, which joined OPEC through its emirate of Abu Dhabi in 1967, had been producing around 3.4 million barrels of crude a day just before the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran began on Feb. 28. Analysts say it has capacity to produce roughly 5 million barrels a day.

In its announcement on Tuesday, made via its state-run WAM news agency, the UAE said it also would leave the wider OPEC+ group, which Russia had led to try to stabilize oil prices.

“This decision reflects the UAE’s long-term strategic and economic vision and evolving energy profile, including accelerated investment in domestic energy production,” the UAE said, adding that it would bring “additional production to market in a gradual and measured manner, aligned with demand and market conditions.”

The UAE’s withdrawal removes one of OPEC’s few members with the ability to quickly increase production, said Jorge Leon, head of geopolitical analysis at Rystad Energy.

“A structurally weaker OPEC, with less spare capacity concentrated within the group, will find it increasingly difficult to calibrate supply and stabilize prices,” he said.

Saudi Arabia, UAE increasingly at odds

Saudi Arabia and the UAE increasingly have competed over economic issues and regional politics, particularly in the Red Sea area. The two countries had jointly fought against Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi rebels in 2015. However, that coalition broke down into recriminations in late December, when Saudi Arabia bombed what it described as a weapons shipment bound for Yemeni separatists backed by the UAE.

As tensions rose in recent months, Saudi broadcasters long based in Dubai, the economic hub of the UAE, have pulled back to the kingdom.

“This exit of OPEC fits into the UAE need for flexibility with key energy consumers as well — including a future relationship with China and a more competitive relationship with Saudi Arabia,” said Karen Young, a senior research scholar at Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy.

While Saudi Arabia and OPEC had no immediate reaction, Emirati Energy Minister Suhail al-Mazrouei insisted his country’s decision did not stem from any dispute with its Gulf neighbor.

“We’ve been working together for years and years. We have the highest respect for the Saudis for leading OPEC,” al-Mazrouei told CNBC.

However, the UAE sent its foreign minister rather than its ruler to a Gulf Arab leaders’ meeting held Tuesday in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, hosted by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

The UAE hosted the United Nations COP28 climate talks in 2023, a conference that ended for the first time with a pledge by nearly 200 countries to move away from planet-warming fossil fuels. But the UAE still plans to increase its production capacity in the coming years, even as it pursues more clean energy at home, a move decried by climate activists.

“The demand for power is going to go up and up and up,” U.S. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum told an Abu Dhabi oil conference in November. “Today’s the day to announce that there is no energy transition. There is only energy addition.”

He drew widespread applause from his Emirati hosts.

[…]

Via https://apnews.com/article/opec-united-arab-emirates-leaving-cartel-4966108c3fafacb67181152216deda14

Russian, Chinese flights to Iran resume after 60-day halt due to US-Israeli war

Press TV

Passenger flights between Iran and China, as well as between Iran and Russia, have resumed after a two-month suspension caused by the US-Israeli war of aggression against Iran, state media from both countries reported on Tuesday.

CGTN, a Chinese state media outlet, announced that passenger flights between Iran and China have resumed for the first time in 60 days.

Mahan Air, Iran’s largest airline, announced the resumption of select China-Iran passenger routes, including those between Tehran and major Chinese cities of Shanghai, Guangzhou and Beijing.

Meanwhile, Russia’s Sputnik news agency reported that the first Tehran-Moscow flight and its return route resumed on Tuesday after the pause.

The flights had been suspended following the launch of the US-Israeli war on Iran.

In response, Iran’s armed forces carried out 100 waves of retaliatory strikes under Operation True Promise 4, launching hundreds of ballistic and hypersonic missiles, as well as drones, against American military bases throughout West Asia and Israeli positions in the occupied territories.

A fragile ceasefire, brokered by Pakistan, took effect in early April and has largely held, though tensions remain high.

The United States has imposed a naval blockade on Iranian ports, which Tehran considers illegal and a violation of the truce.

The resumption of flights by two major strategic partners of Iran signals a gradual return to normalcy.

China and Russia have consistently supported Iran diplomatically throughout the war, condemning US-Israeli aggression at the United Nations and calling for a negotiated end to the war of aggression.

Iran resumed commercial flights from Tehran’s international airport over the weekend for the first time since the war began.

Flights for Istanbul, Muscat and the Saudi Arabian city of Medina took off from Imam Khomeini International Airport on Saturday.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/04/28/767714/Russian,-Chinese-flights-to-Iran-resume-after-60-day-halt-due-to-US-Israeli-war

 

Trump Executive Order Will Force Americans to Surrender Biometric Data or Lose Bank Accounts

American citizens will be forced to carry a mandatory biometric ID card at all times or face arrest, if a new House bill is passed into law.

By Baxter Dmitry April 21, 2026

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has confirmed that a Trump administration executive order requiring U.S. banks to verify citizenship for every customer — new and existing — is actively “in process.”

The policy means millions of Americans will have no choice but to obtain and present a U.S. passport containing embedded biometric facial data or risk being locked out of the banking system entirely.

Bessent made the remarks last week at a Semafor dinner and the CNBC Invest in America Forum. He argued banks must fully “know your customer,” including legal immigration status, and declared that undocumented immigrants “don’t have a right to be in the banking system.”

Reports indicate the order would accept passports as the primary proof of citizenship, while REAL IDs and many other common documents that Americans have traditionally used to prove their identity “do not qualify.”

The Biometric Trap

Every U.S. passport issued since 2007 is a biometric e-Passport. It contains an RFID chip that stores your personal data along with a digital facial image specifically formatted for government facial recognition systems. Although applying only requires a standard photo, that photo becomes permanent biometric data held by the State Department.

By tying bank accounts to passport verification, the executive order transforms this biometric passport into a de facto national ID requirement for financial survival. Tens of millions of Americans without a valid passport will now be forced to get one — handing over their facial biometrics to the government in the process. This is not voluntary. It is compulsory access to your most personal biological identifier just to hold a checking or savings account.

Scott Bessent: Soros Protégé Turned Treasury Secretary

Scott Bessent is no outsider to elite financial power. He spent years at Soros Fund Management, playing a direct role in the notorious 1992 “Black Wednesday” raid that netted over $1 billion by crashing the British pound and forcing the UK out of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism.

He later served as chief investment officer under Soros and helped execute other major bets against national currencies, including the Japanese yen. Bessent even launched his own hedge fund with substantial seed money from Soros himself.

Now, as Treasury Secretary, this longtime Soros ally is the public face of a policy that funnels ordinary Americans into a biometric database through their bank accounts.

The Real Agenda: Building the Globalist Digital Control Grid

This is not merely an immigration enforcement tool. It is a critical step in the long-planned construction of a national — and ultimately global — biometric surveillance system. By requiring biometric passports for banking access, the government is creating the infrastructure to link every citizen’s face, identity, and financial life into one centralized digital profile.

This matches exactly what independent researchers and whistleblowers have warned about for decades: a cashless society where your biometric data becomes the key to every transaction.

Once your face is digitized and tied to your bank account, it becomes trivial to track, freeze, or deny access to funds based on compliance, social credit scores, or political behavior. The “know your customer” excuse is cover for building the Mark of the Beast-style system that eliminates financial privacy forever.

The Soros connection makes the picture even clearer. For years, Soros and his network have funded open-border policies, global governance initiatives, and digital ID projects worldwide. Placing one of his most trusted protégés inside the Trump administration to push this biometric banking mandate is not a coincidence — it is the quiet continuation of the globalist agenda, now dressed up in America First rhetoric.

Whether under Trump or any other administration, the end goal remains the same: total control through biometric identification linked to your money. Americans who value freedom must recognize this for what it is — the slow rollout of a digital prison where your own face becomes the lock on your bank account.

The executive order is still in draft form as of April 21, 2026, but the direction is unmistakable. This is how they build the cage: one “security” measure at a time.

[…]

Via https://envirowatchnz.com/2026/04/28/breaking-trump-executive-order-will-force-americans-to-surrender-biometric-data-or-lose-their-bank-accounts/

Pakistan Throws Open Its Gates for Iran’s Transit Trade to Third Countries

A Pakistan Navy soldier stands guard while a loaded Chinese ship prepares to depart, at Gwadar port, about 700 kilometers (435 miles) west of Karachi. Pakistan, Sunday, Nov. 13, 2016. - Sputnik International, 1920, 27.04.2026

Sputnik

Iran and any other nation can now ship transit goods via Pakistan — as long as they provide a cashable bank guarantee equal to Pakistan’s import charges.

Pakistan has officially opened six land routes for the transit of goods to Iran. The “Transit of Goods through Territory of Pakistan Order 2026” came into force on April 25.

Essence of the Decision

Iran—and any third country—may now transport transit goods through Pakistan, subject to one key condition: the provision of a cashable bank guarantee equivalent to Pakistan’s applicable import levies.

Six Approved Routes:

1. Gwadar–Gabd
2. Karachi/Port Qasim–Lyari–Ormara–Pasni–Gabd
3. Karachi/Port Qasim–Khuzdar–Dalbandin–Taftan
4. Gwadar–Turbat–Hoshab–Panjgur–Nagg–Besima–Khuzdar–Quetta/Lakpass–Dalbandin–Nokundi–Taftan
5. Gwadar–Liari–Khuzdar–Quetta/Lakpass–Dalbandin–Nokundi–Taftan
6. Karachi/Port Qasim–Gwadar–Gabd

Why Now?

Amid the US-Iran conflict, over 3,000 containers bound for Iran are stuck at Karachi port following the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz.

“The fact that Iran enabled the Gabd Reemdam crossing for transport under the TIR convention led to this measure,” explains Tariq Rangoonwala, Chair of Pakistan National Committee of the International Chamber of Commerce.

Located 87.5 km from Gwadar Port, the Gabd–Reemdam crossing saw Pakistan activate its side three years ago.

What Does This Mean?

This facilitates land transport — not only for the 3,000 stranded containers but also for future needs, Rangoonwala says.

“Already this route is being used for exports from Pakistan to Uzbekistan and Tajikistan as an alternate to the Sost-Khunjerab route in the north and we hope to see this remain an ongoing feature,” the expert says.

[…]

Via https://sputnikglobe.com/20260427/pakistan-throws-open-its-gates-for-irans-transit-trade-to-third-countries-1124049289.html

Silver lining: Iran war throttles global fluoride supply

Fluoride: Neurotoxin and IQ Inhibitor - Moselle Natural Health

Democratic Underground

Fluoride is becoming harder to source as the war in Iran places more strain on global supply chains, leading some local governments to reduce their own use of the widely used cavity-fighting agent. Two major water supply systems in Maryland, which serve the Baltimore and suburban D.C. areas, announced this month they would be temporarily reducing the concentration of fluoride, citing the conflict in the Middle East as the cause of a wider national shortage. A Pennsylvania town halted fluoridation for at least a few weeks, also citing the war.

According to chemical suppliers and trade groups, the shortage was brought on by a confluence of supply chain disruptions as well as higher transportation costs resulting from the conflict in the Middle East.

“Some of the suppliers around the nation have either taken their supply offline or severely shortened it, or it’s gone into other streams, like not to municipal streams. And there’s only a few fluoride manufacturers in the nation,” said Emily Horne, a spokesperson for Pencco, which has supplied the Baltimore-area waterworks.

Lowering the concentration from the federally recommended 0.7 mg/L to 0.4 mg/L, the city’s Department of Public Works said this decision was brought on by “broader national supply chain disruptions, driven in part by ongoing conflict in the Middle East.” The war in Iran and the associated standoff in the Strait of Hormuz have impacted U.S. fluoride levels, as Israel is one of the major global suppliers of the neurotoxin used in water systems, fluorosilicic acid.

[…]

Via https://democraticunderground.com/10143656562

Former Israeli PMs unite against Netanyahu

Former Israeli PMs unite against Netanyahu

RT

27 Apr, 2026 

Former Israeli Prime Ministers Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid have formed a unified party in a bid to oust Benjamin Netanyahu’s government in elections later this year.

Right-wing Bennett and centrist Lapid on Sunday confirmed the merger of their parties, Bennett 2026 and Yesh Atid, into a single list titled ‘Together, Led by Bennett’, which they described as an effort to consolidate the opposition and improve its chances in the vote, which must be held no later than the end of October.

Bennett told reporters that joining forces was “the most Zionist and patriotic act we have ever done, for the sake of our country,” adding that “the era of division is over.” Lapid said: “We are standing here together for the sake of our children. The State of Israel must change direction.”

Widely seen as Netanyahu’s most formidable political rivals, the two have joined forces before, ending his 12-year tenure after the 2021 election by forming the short-lived “government of change,” a coalition spanning right-wing, centrist and left-wing parties.

That alliance included the Arab party Ra’am, led by Mansour Abbas, marking the first time a party representing Israel’s Palestinian minority joined a governing coalition. Netanyahu returned to power after winning the November 2022 election.

The new partnership will run as a unified list without formally merging their parties, and both have said they would seek to form a government only with Zionist opposition parties, excluding Arab factions. Bennett also said his government would advance a universal conscription law, halt funding for draft evasion, and introduce an eight-year term limit for a prime minister.

A recent Maariv poll showed Bennett’s party tied with Netanyahu’s Likud at 24 Knesset seats, while Yesh Atid has been polling at around six to seven seats.

Netanyahu’s tenure has come under strain since Israel launched a military campaign in Gaza following a Hamas attack in October 2023 that killed 1,200 people and saw 250 taken hostage. More than 72,000 people have been killed and over 172,000 wounded in Israel’s airstrikes and ground offensive, according to Palestinian health authorities. Polls have indicated Netanyahu may lose the next election.

The International Criminal Court issued warrants for Netanyahu in 2024 over alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza.

At home, Netanyahu is facing a long-running corruption trial. Charged with bribery, fraud, and breach of trust in three cases, he denies wrongdoing, calling the case a political witch hunt. The trial resumed this week after a pause during the Iran war, with no resolution in sight. President Isaac Herzog has indicated that any pardon would only be considered after plea deal efforts are exhausted.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/639155-netanyahu-rivals-unite-election-bid/