Iran Attacks Injured “Far More” Troops Than Pentagon Admits

President Donald Trump walks with Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, Sen. Dave McCormick, R-Pa., and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth as he arrives at the United States Army War College in Carlisle, Pa., for the Pennsylvania Defense and Innovation Summit, Wednesday, July 15, 2026.

President Donald Trump walks with Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, Sen. Dave McCormick, R-Pa., and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth as he arrives at the United States Army War College in Carlisle, Pa., for the Pennsylvania Defense and Innovation Summit, Wednesday, July 15, 2026. Photo: Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP

The Intercept

U.S. casualties of the Iran war spiked even as U.S. Central Command withheld information about Americans killed and injured from the public. It’s part of a long-running pattern of the Trump administration manipulating such data.

A crushing wave of attacks in Bahrain, Iraq, Jordan, and Kuwait left U.S. forces in “disarray,” causing significant damage to facilities, dozens of injuries, and the first troops killed in action since a June ceasefire collapsed, according to a U.S. official. Three Army soldiers were killed in “devastating” ballistic missile attacks on Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan, said the official whom The Intercept is not naming because they are not authorized to speak publicly.

Pvt. Isabella Gonzales, 19, of Carrollton, Texas, was killed in action on Friday. Lt. Tyler James Feehan, 25, of Ewa Beach, Hawaii, was killed on Saturday. The third soldier is provisionally listed as missing, but the official said that “unidentified remains” found after the attack were “certainly” those of the missing soldier. A second official confirmed this assessment. At least four and as many as 10 troops were also injured in the attacks in Jordan, according to the first official.

In northern Iraq, a U.S. service member was killed and another wounded on Saturday when ordnance from a downed Iranian drone exploded. CENTCOM claimed that the injuries occurred during a “controlled detonation” of the downed aircraft.

The surge in deaths and injuries raise the official U.S. casualty count to at least 446. U.S. casualties have increased by more than 15 percent since the first ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran was struck on April 8. The first official told The Intercept that recent attacks had wounded “far more” personnel than are reflected in the Pentagon’s current casualty count. They did not provide numbers but said “dozens” had received medical attention.

Neither CENTCOM nor the Pentagon replied to numerous requests by The Intercept for information on the casualties, nor would either address the effort to cover up U.S. losses.

Reporting by The Intercept previously found that the Pentagon’s official tally of dead and wounded personnel is a gross undercount, stemming from what one U.S. government official called a “casualty cover-up.” The Defense Casualty Analysis System, or DCAS, which tracks “deceased, wounded, ill or injured” service members for Congress and the president, is missing hundreds of dead and wounded personnel. The official tally was also previously adjusted downward by 15 casualties without explanation. For months, the Pentagon has ignored requests by The Intercept for comment or clarification.

On Monday, the New York Times reported that the Pentagon withheld information on “dozens of U.S. military injuries in Iran War.” Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell called the article “baseless and malicious.”

U.S. bases across the Middle East suffered “significant” damage over the last week, according to the official speaking on the condition of anonymity. That source said Iran had learned how to defeat U.S. air defense systems by overwhelming them using a mix of ballistic missiles and attack drones. They said multiple U.S. aircraft had also been damaged in the attacks. Videos circulating on social media showed the impact and aftermath of Friday’s missile strikes on Muwaffaq Salti Air Base.

“They’ve got some missiles. They’ve got some drones,” Trump said on Sunday of an Iranian military he has insisted, for months, had been annihilated. “We hit them very hard, again, tonight and we did that in honor of the probably three, probably three as opposed to two, great patriots.”

U.S. Central Command announced later on Sunday night that it had “successfully completed the ninth consecutive evening of strikes,” claiming that the “U.S. military is holding Iran accountable at the Commander in Chief’s direction.”

“Their sacrifice only stiffens our resolve.”

The office of self-styled War Secretary Pete Hegseth attempted to keep information about the new casualties under wraps. “We have nothing to provide beyond what is listed on the website,” a representative of Hegseth’s office told The Intercept late Friday night, without specifying which website, when questioned about U.S. casualties. Hours later, U.S. Central Command acknowledged “two U.S. service members in Jordan were killed in action” on Friday amid “Iranian ballistic missile and drone attacks.” The command also disclosed that four other troops “were medically evacuated to Jordanian hospitals,” an unspecified number of other troops were evaluated for injuries, and “one service member is currently missing in action.” CENTCOM later stripped “in action” from the announcement of the missing soldier but would not explain the reason to The Intercept.

“Godspeed, heroes,” Hegseth wrote on X. “Their sacrifice only stiffens our resolve.”

The spike in U.S. casualties over the last week followed the Pentagon quietly adding another fatality to its rolls earlier Monday. After Iran claimed to have killed three U.S. personnel in Kuwait last weekend, U.S. Central Command said last Sunday that there were “zero reports of U.S. service member deaths or injuries in the region.” But last Monday, the Pentagon’s official toll of injuries and deaths in the war quietly climbed upward.

After ignoring numerous requests for clarification, an official from Office of the Assistant to the Secretary of War for Public Affairs intimated the fatality added last week was Cmdr. Gabriel Edwards, the commanding officer of Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 5 who went missing almost two weeks prior, following his “helicopter’s emergency landing in the Arabian Sea.” But that official refused to confirm it.

Historically, there was little lag between a casualty occurring in the field and its inclusion in the DCAS system, according to two people who used to work on the official casualty tally.

Asked why it took a week after the search for Edwards ended to add him to the casualty rolls, the second official said a blend of incompetence and deliberate slow-walking of casualty data has slowed down the process of updating publicly available statistics.

For months, the Pentagon list of the names of the dead has also been missing Maj. Sorffly Davius, a signals and communication officer with the New York Army National Guard who was assigned to the headquarters of the 42nd Infantry Division and reportedly died of sudden illness while on duty in Camp Buehring, Kuwait, on March 6. Davius’s death was widely acknowledged even as it was excluded from the official count: Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., spoke about him during a memorial service that month, and Gen. Dan Caine, chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, recognized Davius while “honoring our fallen.”

Counting Davius and the “missing” soldier in Jordan, the U.S. has suffered 19 deaths during the Iran war. Parnell said on Monday that “casualty information is publicly available and regularly updated online on the Defense Casualty Analysis System for everyone, including the media, to review.” DCAS was, uncharacteristically, not updated as of Monday afternoon and instead offered outdated figures posted Friday morning.

While DCAS provides a running tally of “non-hostile” deaths — meaning those who died from accidents or by illness — it doesn’t include “non-hostile” injuries. The DCAS figures show that 68 Navy personnel have been wounded in action. Missing, however, are the more than 200 sailors treated for smoke inhalation or lacerations due to a March 12 fire that raged aboard the USS Gerald R. Ford. The aircraft carrier had been conducting round-the-clock flight operations to, in Caine’s words, “project combat power” in the Middle East.

The casualty numbers also don’t include a sailor who suffered a non-combat-related injury aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln as it was involved in “strike missions in support of Operation Epic Fury” on March 25.

On April 21, the number of wounded-in-action troops declined by 15 without public comment from the War Department. Despite repeated questions over three months, the Pentagon has not explained the disparity in its casualty count.

The Trump administration began undermining transparency surrounding U.S. military casualties almost a decade ago. Not long after Trump first took office in 2017, and following an uptick of violence in the conflict, the Pentagon stopped releasing immediate information about American combat deaths in Afghanistan.

After an Iranian missile attack on Al-Asad Air Base in Iraq on January 8, 2020, Trump peddled a complete fiction to the public. “No Americans were harmed in last night’s attack by the Iranian regime,” he said at the time. CENTCOM ultimately admitted that 110 troops suffered traumatic brain injuries. An inspector general report indicated that the number of wounded may have been even higher, because “DoD cannot determine whether all Service members are being properly diagnosed and treated for TBIs in deployed settings.”

[…]

Via https://theintercept.com/2026/07/20/united-states-iran-war-casualties-cover-up-pentagon/

Israeli media: US relocating aircraft from regional bases to Israel

Morning Glory: Israel unbound | Fox News

Press TV UK

The United States has begun relocating fighter aircraft and aerial refueling planes from military bases across the region to Israel, Israeli media outlets say, citing concerns over the ability of American forces to protect those installations amid intensified Iranian attacks.

The Hebrew-language Channel 14 reported on Tuesday that Washington has initiated the evacuation of aircraft from regional bases and is transferring fighter jets and tanker aircraft to occupied Palestinian lands in response to large-scale Iranian strikes.

Noam Amir, a military and security analyst for Channel 14, said the US currently lacks the capability to fully defend its regional bases against Iranian attacks.

“For this reason, the United States is evacuating these bases and relocating its fleet of aerial refueling aircraft and fighter squadrons to Israel,” he said, according to the broadcaster.

Separately, Israeli Army Radio quoted the regime’s transportation minister as saying he had informed the military that no additional US aerial refueling aircraft would be accepted at Ben Gurion Airport.

The remarks follow an earlier report by Israel’s Channel 12, which said senior officials from the ministry of transportation and Ben Gurion Airport convened an emergency meeting on July 20 to discuss a new US request to deploy dozens of additional tanker aircraft to the airport.

According to the report, US officials are seeking to station several dozen military refueling aircraft in Israel over the coming days, raising concerns about airport capacity and the potential impact on civilian air traffic.

Channel 12 said the issue comes at a time when Israel’s aviation sector continues to face significant disruption.

The number of domestic and international airlines operating flights to Israel has declined sharply since the outbreak of the Gaza war in October 2023, reducing capacity at the entity’s main international gateway, Channel 12 said.

The broadcaster also reported that Israeli authorities had temporarily halted additional US tanker arrivals at Ben Gurion Airport because of congestion before reversing the decision following discussions with Washington. Under the revised arrangement, some of the aircraft are expected to be stationed at Israeli military bases instead.

The latest development comes as Iranian armed forces have launched heavy reprisal attacks against strategic American targets across the region following earlier US strikes on several locations in southern Iran.

Earlier in the day, the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) said several US military forces have been killed after Iranian forces targeted a compound housing American troops in the al-Rukban area of Jordan.

The United States has perpetrated numerous violations against Iranian territory since April 7, when US President Donald Trump announced a unilateral ceasefire in the latest bout of wholesale American-Israeli aggression targeting the Islamic Republic.

The violations continued even after Washington and Tehran signed a Pakistan-mediated memorandum of understanding last month, whose first clause clearly mandates cessation of aggression on all fronts.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.co.uk/Detail/2026/07/21/772716/US-relocating-aircraft-refueling-planes-military-bases-region-Iranian-attacks-Israeli-media

US intel determines renewed war on Iran ‘unlikely’ to achieve Trump’s goals

(Photo credit: AFP)

The Cradle

JUL 21, 2026

Recent intelligence assessments have determined that Tehran retains significant missile capabilities despite the US-Israeli war

A new US intelligence assessment says continued military attacks against the Islamic Republic are “unlikely to move” Tehran or “soften its position” in any upcoming negotiations, officials told the Washington Post on 21 July.

The CIA report highlights that Iran “is unlikely to feel significant impact” despite heavy US airstrikes.

“Tehran and Washington are, for now, stuck in an indefinite limbo between peace and war,” say the officials familiar with the new assessment.

The assessment reportedly reveals the “dilemma” US President Donald Trump is facing as a result of the US-Israeli war launched against Iran in February.

Former deputy US national intelligence officer Jonathan Panikoff questioned Trump’s strategy in comments to the Washington Post.

“The Trump administration appears to believe that if it keeps hitting Iran harder militarily, Tehran eventually will become more flexible. That assessment is almost certainly incorrect,” he said.

The report comes amid the latest exchange of fire between US and Iranian forces.

Tehran retaliated to Washington’s 10th consecutive night of heavy strikes early on Tuesday, hitting US military assets across Jordan and multiple Gulf states.

Iran’s recent retaliatory responses have inflicted significant casualties on US forces, particularly in Jordan.

Several US service members have been reported dead or missing, while dozens were injured as a result of Iranian missile strikes.

Multiple helicopters were destroyed as well, according to the New York Times (NYT).

In April, CNN cited intelligence assessments as saying that Tehran “maintains significant missile launching capability” despite US-Israeli attacks.

One of the sources said Iranian forces are “still very much poised to wreak absolute havoc throughout the entire region.”

Just over a week after the war began, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) cited an intelligence assessment saying that Washington’s plan to implement regime change in Iran is “unlikely” to be successful.

Iran has reiterated all its conditions in the Islamabad MoU, which both parties have declared void.

The MoU included clauses on joint Iranian–Omani management of the Strait of Hormuz and a full ceasefire and Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon, among other provisions.

In recent days, Trump has renewed threats to destroy all of Iran’s power stations, bridges, and energy infrastructure.

“If recent threats made by the US president … to target Iran’s infrastructure … are carried out, then everything that has remained intact … that is, all the [US] infrastructure in the region – will be crushed by the powerful armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran,” the Iranian army said on 16 July.

“There will be no trace of it left, as if it never existed,” it added.

[…]

Via https://thecradle.co/articles/us-intel-determines-renewed-war-on-iran-unlikely-to-achieve-trumps-goals-report

Saudi tankers turn tail in Red Sea amid Yemeni blockade

(Photo credit: Sayed Hassan/Getty Images)

The Cradle

JUL 21, 2026

The vessels were carrying Saudi crude to China and India when they turned back to the Suez Canal

Two tankers carrying Saudi crude to China and India reversed course in the Red Sea after the Yemeni Armed Forces (YAF) warned shipping companies against loading or unloading cargo at Saudi ports.

The Xin Long Yang, loaded with 2 million barrels of crude at Yanbu, and the Rodos, carrying roughly 700,000 barrels, turned back toward the Suez Canal instead of continuing through the Bab al-Mandab Strait off Yemen. A third tanker bound for Yanbu from outside Bab al-Mandab was also forced to reverse course off the coast of Oman.

The warning could force cargoes bound for Asia onto far longer routes through the Mediterranean and around Africa, adding weeks to delivery times.

This comes after Ansarallah circulated an email instructing shipping firms to stop loading and discharging cargo at Saudi ports, warning that non-compliant vessels could be struck anywhere Yemen’s forces can reach.

According to Reuters, the message was sent by the Sanaa-based Humanitarian Operations Coordination Center (HOCC) and stated, “Vessels are banned from loading or discharging cargo at or from any Saudi ports,” warning that violations would draw sanctions and direct military action.

The YAF urged that “We strongly recommend that your company exercise due diligence and the utmost care in all its dealings,” noting that offending vessels “may be subject to targeting in any location within the operational reach of the Yemeni Armed Forces.”

The YAF announced on 20 July a full ban on all Saudi shipping, describing it as a “ban on maritime navigation” that took effect immediately upon the statement’s issuance.

The Yemeni forces also asserted Yemen’s right to “respond to the blockade with a blockade, to escalate comprehensively in response to comprehensive escalation, and to firmly establish this equation.”

The YAF declared itself ready for “all options” and warned that any major Saudi escalation would be met with an equal response.

Saudi Arabia launched its war on Yemen in 2015 at the head of an Arab coalition, backed by the UK, US, and Israel, after Ansarallah seized Sanaa and ousted the Saudi-backed president.

The kingdom has since maintained an illegal blockade of Yemeni ports and airports, with Sanaa International Airport under severe restrictions for more than a decade, while the war produced mass famine and hundreds of thousands of deaths in the Arab world’s poorest country.

[…]

Via https://thecradle.co/articles/saudi-tankers-turn-tail-in-red-sea-amid-yemeni-blockade

Top Israeli general says ‘Jewish terrorism’ in occupied West Bank ‘threatens state security’

(Photo credit: OREN ZIV | Credit: AFP)

The Cradle

JUL 20, 2026

Israeli Jewish settlers have expanded their attacks on Palestinians in recent months in a bid to drive them from their own homes and lands

A senior Israeli general has warned of the growing danger of attacks by Jewish settlers against Palestinians in the occupied West Bank, describing them as “Jewish terrorism,” Israel’s Public Broadcaster (KAN) reported on 19 July.

Speaking during a closed conference last week, Major General Avi Bluth strongly criticized the expansion of illegal settlement outposts and violence by Jewish settler youth against Palestinians in the occupied West Bank, warning that they represent “a dangerous phenomenon that threatens the security of all.”

Bluth is the commander of the Israeli army’s Central Command, making him responsible for military and security operations across the occupied West Bank, occupied East Jerusalem, and the Jordanian border.

Speaking about Jewish settler attacks against Palestinians, Bluth said some were young people “who do not respect the law,” while others “take the law into their own hands.”

He expressed concern about settlers establishing outposts in areas of the occupied West Bank classified as Area A and Area B.

Under the Oslo Accords, an agreement signed between the Palestinian Authority (PA) and Israel in 1993, Area A is under full Palestinian control, while Area B is under Palestinian civil control and Israeli security control.

Area C, which comprises 60 percent of the West Bank, is under full Israeli control.

Jewish settlers regularly use the outposts to stage attacks on Palestinian farmers and shepherds, hoping such attacks will force Palestinians to abandon their homes and lands.

Yedioth Ahronoth on 15 June reported that the Israeli government approved 5.5 million shekels ($1.89 million) in state funds to provide daily stipends to the extremist settler movement “Hilltop Youth.”

Founded in 1998, the group consists largely of settlers aged 16 to 26 living in illegal outposts across the occupied West Bank and acts as a state-backed vanguard of the Israeli campaign of ethnic cleansing and forced displacement of Palestinians.

On Sunday, more than two dozen Jewish settlers, some masked, attacked the the village of Tuwani in the occupied West Bank. The attackers set Al-Taqwa

Mosque on fire, injuring four people, and burned two houses and a dairy factory.

On Saturday, a 17-year-old Palestinian died of his injuries a week after Israeli soldiers shot him during a Jewish settler attack on his village. Fadi Hamdallah al-Nassan was a member of the Palestinian youth national football team.

The outposts are illegal under Israeli law but are regularly legalized after the fact by the Israeli judiciary, allowing them to grow into larger Jewish settlements.

Under international law, all outposts and settlements in the West Bank are illegal, as they are built on occupied land seized from Palestinians.

The settlers say they want to forcibly expel indigenous Palestinians from the occupied West Bank and Gaza to build Jewish settlements on the ruins of destroyed Palestinian cities and towns.

Bluth said he did not oppose the establishment of illegal outposts but said they should be limited to Area C.

He also referred to the difficulty of confronting “Jewish terrorism,” following Defense Minister Israel Katz’s decision to halt the use of administrative detention against Israeli Jews.

The military uses administrative detention to detain Palestinians without trial for periods up to six months, which can be renewed indefinitely.

Bluth further warned that Jewish settler violence damages Israel’s international legitimacy, while placing a burden on Israeli soldiers and commanders, including reserve soldiers and officers.

Israeli forces and settlers have killed 1,181 Palestinians and wounded nearly 13,000 in the occupied West Bank since October 2023, while about 24,000 Palestinians have been arrested, according to official Palestinian figures.

[…]

Via https://thecradle.co/articles/top-israeli-general-says-jewish-terrorism-in-occupied-west-bank-threatens-state-security

How to Honor the Dead US Service Members

These American Service Members Died in the Iran Conflict - The New York ...

by | Jul 20, 2026

Over the weekend the Pentagon announced that four more US soldiers have been killed in President Trump’s war on Iran. That brings the total to 17, but many believe the real number of dead US servicemembers is much higher than that. The Pentagon has claimed it has no obligation to reveal how many military personnel have been injured, which suggests that number may be much higher than we are hearing. Many of these injuries will be horrific and life-altering.

Back on April 12th, President Trump told Fox News that Iran, “has no cards. Their navy is gone. Their air force is gone. Totally gone. They have nothing.” Yet three months later, US bases in the region continue to be successfully attacked, US military equipment worth billions continues to be destroyed, and US servicemembers continue to be killed and injured.

This war was launched by President Trump without Congressional approval in February because the President believed that Iran, at 6,000 miles away, posed an existential threat to the United States. At the same time, he believed that the Iranian government was so weak that after a couple of days of bombing the political system would collapse and a “US-friendly” government could be installed in its place.

This makes no sense. How can a country be strong enough to threaten the United States but be so weak it is about to collapse?

Now, five months later, we continue to attack Iran to open a Hormuz Strait that was open before the war and to end a nuclear weapons program that does not exist. And the American middle and working classes are hit with a price tag for this senseless war that could exceed one trillion dollars.

That is why our Constitution requires that war be declared by the US Congress after extensive deliberation. The Framers wanted to safeguard the new country from the whims of a King George or other monarch who could take the country to war at will. The patriots fought for independence from exactly the political system we have in place today because they understood how destructive endless and foolish wars can be to a country.

The Framers also assumed that Members of the Legislative Branch of government would be of sufficiently good character that they would not allow an executive to abuse power in such a way. They were given all the tools they needed to prevent this, but today Congressmembers remain silent, unwilling to perform the duty required by their office. Most would rather not have the burden of declaring war because they are afraid that an unpopular war might hurt their re-election chances.

A recent poll featured in the Washington Post reveals that nearly seven in ten Americans disapprove of President Trump’s handling of the Iran war. Along with the economy, the Iran war is the most important issue concerning the American people today.

Over the weekend President Trump announced that “we hit (Iran) very hard again…in honor of the three” servicemembers who were killed in recent days. But hitting Iran again does not honor the dead US servicemembers. It only guarantees that more Americans will follow them. If the President really wants to honor our military, he will declare an end to this pointless war, bring all of our troops home from the region, and announce that the destroyed US bases will not be rebuilt. It is time to end the American empire and come home.

[…]

Via https://ronpaulinstitute.org/how-to-honor-the-dead-us-service-members/

Trump resorts to whataboutism after Iranian strike kills US troops

Trump resorts to whataboutism after Iranian strike kills US troops

RT

19 July 2026

The US president has dismissed Democrats’ criticisms, arguing that far more American soldiers lost their lives in Vietnam and Afghanistan

US President Donald Trump has brushed aside Democratic lawmakers’ calls to end the war with Iran after four US service members were killed in a missile strike on a military base in the Middle East. The Republican appeared to downplay the extent of the casualties in the conflict, suggesting that the death tolls suffered by the US military during the Vietnam and Afghanistan wars were far higher.

On Saturday, the US Central Command reported that four American service members had lost their lives after Iranian forces had pounded a military installation in Jordan and Iraq with ballistic missiles and kamikaze drones the previous day.

In a phone interview with the New York Post later on Saturday, Trump said that the recent losses were a “shame,” claiming that the American troops “died because they don’t want to see Iran have a nuclear weapon and they don’t want to see the Middle East blown up.”

Responding to criticisms voiced by Democratic members of Congress, the US president charged: “Have you ever asked how many people died in Vietnam? Have you ever asked how many people died in Afghanistan in one day? In one day, run by [former US President] Sleepy Joe Biden.”

Trump went on to argue that the US military has incurred far fewer casualties during the ongoing conflict with Iran and the January raid of US commandos in Venezuela, during which they abducted President Nicolas Maduro.

His remarks came after Democratic Representative Nikki Budzinski described the death of the two US service members in Jordan as the “cost of President Trump’s needless war.” Another Democratic lawmaker, Herb Conaway, similarly demanded in a post on X that “Trump end this war th

There have also been criticisms of Trump’s Middle Eastern policy from the conservative camp as well.

Former congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, who once was a fervent MAGA supporter but has fallen out with Trump over the Iran war, lashed out at US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, who said on X that the slain American service members’ “sacrifice only stiffens our resolve.”

In a post of her own, she wrote: “Sacrifice?? What the f**k are you talking about??”

“They did not willingly sacrifice themselves,” Greene insisted, adding that the US troops “were killed because of the war you, Trump, and the admin, are waging on behalf of a FOREIGN COUNTRY, Israel.”

Aside from Greene, several other prominent figures, including podcaster and journalist Tucker Carlson, commentator Candace Owens, and radio show host Alex Jones, have broken with the MAGA camp, citing their strong disagreement with the war on Iran.

The latest incident in Jordan and Iraq has brought the total death toll for US forces to 18 since the US and Israel launched their military campaign against the Islamic Republic in late February.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/643239-trump-iran-war-casualties-democrats-vietnam-afghanistan/

Iran thanks Jordanians for help targeting US forces

Iran thanks Jordanians for help targeting US forces

RT

20 July, 2026

Local intelligence enabled ballistic missile attacks on American aircraft and military facilities in the country, according to the IRGC

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has thanked Jordanian civilians and military personnel for providing the “accurate intelligence” it used to strike US forces and aircraft stationed in the kingdom.

In a statement carried by Tasnim on Monday, the IRGC claimed that ballistic missiles targeted US C-17 military transport aircraft and P-8 command-and-control planes at Aqaba Airport in southern Jordan during its latest round of retaliatory attacks. Several of the aircraft suffered “heavy damage,” according to the statement.

The IRGC credited Jordanian informants with helping Iran target 20 hangars housing US forces in the Al-Azraq area during an earlier attack. It claimed that the facilities were destroyed and that dozens of American personnel were killed, suggesting that even one of Washington’s closest regional allies is no longer a secure rear base.

The IRGC expressed gratitude to what it called the “honorable people and courageous military personnel of Jordan” for their “sincere cooperation and precise information,” which it said had enabled Iranian forces to accurately identify American military assets.

The statement concluded by calling on Muslims to kill American military personnel wherever they encounter them, accusing US forces of invading more than ten Muslim countries, killing millions of people, and supporting “Zionist” military operations in Gaza and the West Bank.

The US previously acknowledged that an Iranian attack on one of its military facilities in Jordan on Friday left two American service members dead and one missing, as well as several others injured. Washington has not, however, confirmed any damage at Aqaba Airport or the larger casualty figures claimed by Tehran.

Iran has repeatedly claimed to have destroyed US aircraft and other military equipment during strikes on bases in Jordan, while American media have reported that several days of attacks had resulted in dozens of service members sustaining injuries and damaged multiple helicopters.

US officials cited by the New York Times and Wall Street Journal have also voiced concern that Iranian missiles are becoming increasingly effective at penetrating American air defenses because of their speed and maneuverability.

Before the renewed conflict, the Pentagon reportedly relocated some troops and aircraft from Qatar and the United Arab Emirates to Jordan and Israel, which were considered less vulnerable because of their greater distance from Iran.

Tehran has carried out near-daily missile and drone attacks on US military facilities across Jordan, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, Iraq, and Syria in retaliation for the unprovoked US-Israeli war on Iran, which resumed after a temporary ceasefire collapsed earlier this month.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/643253-iran-jordan-us-strike/

Americans Start to Rise Up Against Big Tech by Opposing Flock Cameras

By Brian Shilhavy

Big Tech is not invincible. As I have been saying for years, just stop using their products!

But I don’t think most Americans are ready to ditch their cell phones yet, which is really all it would take to cripple the entire system.

Here are two videos explaining public outrage against Flock Cameras. One explains what they are and their dangers, and the second one is by an attorney explaining the public reactions so far.

[…]

Via https://healthimpactnews.com/2026/china-ai-cheaper-than-u-s-big-tech-ai-exposing-ai-bubble-americans-rise-up-against-big-tech-with-flock-camera-opposition/

China AI Cheaper than U.S. Big Tech AI Exposing AI Bubble

by Brian Shilhavy
Health Impact News

The U.S. moved closer to the AI bubble bursting this week, when a relatively little-known AI company out of China released their new version of AI (Large Language Model) that rivaled, or in some cases beat, benchmarks by U.S. Big Tech companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google.

Not only is this AI model out of China less expensive since it is “open source”, they promised to start giving it away for free on July 27, 2026.

The U.S. stock market, and the tech heavy NASDAQ, all closed down on Friday as a result.

Here is some of the news coverage since Friday.

From Fortune:

Markets may have just experienced their second DeepSeek shock, this time thanks to a Chinese AI lab named after a Pink Floyd album

Excerpts:

On Thursday, Moonshot AI, a Beijing-based AI startup, unveiled the latest version of its Kimi large language model, which promises performance close to Anthropic’s Fable 5—perhaps the most powerful publicly available model today—at a fraction of the cost.

Kimi K3, the largest open-weight model ever released, performed “competitively” with Fable 5, and “substantially outperformed” Anthropic’s Opus 4.8, and OpenAI’s GPT 5.6 Sol, according to Moonshot.

The company’s officially-released benchmarks consistently rank K3 among the top three AI models; one independent benchmark from Arena.AI even put K3 as the best model currently available, ahead of Anthropic.

Many observers, including Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, didn’t expect a Chinese AI lab to release a model that could approach the U.S.’s best offerings for another six months.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk, for example, suggested it might happen by the first quarter of next year. K3’s launch rapidly shrank that timeline and underscores just how quickly Chinese AI developers are closing the performance gap with their U.S. rivals.

From Yahoo Finance:

China’s Kimi K3 Hits US Stock Markets. Is the American AI Boom Over?

Excerpts:

China’s Moonshot released Kimi K3 on Thursday, a model it says matches Anthropic’s Claude Fable and OpenAI’s GPT-5.6. US chip stocks sank as investors asked if America’s AI lead is safe.

Kimi K3 packs 2.8 trillion parameters, making it the largest open model ever released. Moonshot, an Alibaba-backed startup, will let anyone download it free from July 27.

Chip Stocks Just Had Their Worst Week in 15 Months

The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index, which tracks America’s biggest chipmakers, fell 12.5% this week, marking its worst week in over 15 months. Nvidia, AMD, and Broadcom all fell hard.

Meanwhile, the AI bubble question is back in focus.

Markets have seen this movie before. When China’s DeepSeek stunned Wall Street in January 2025, Nvidia lost $589 billion in one day. CNBC called it the biggest single-day loss in market history.

Why Kimi K3 Has Everyone’s Attention

Kimi K3 earned the hype. This week, it topped Arena’s coding leaderboard with 1,679 points, pushing Claude Fable 5 into second place.

It is also cheap. Moonshot charges $3 per million input tokens, while Fable 5 costs $10. The model reads a million tokens at once, enough to hold an entire codebase in one prompt

Here’s a good short video (AI generated) that explains what just happened with China’s Kimi K3:

 

Here is some other news on the coming AI crash that was published last week.

AI Bubble Fears Are Starting to Spill Over

Investors are freaking out.

Excerpts:

Yet another domino appears to be falling as part of the Ruth Goldberg machine that will eventually pop the AI investment bubble.

Earlier this month, economic forecasters were sounding the alarm that overspending on AI was at a level far more severe than Black Tuesday, the day that jump-started the worst economic catastrophe in the history of the industrial economy. Now, investors seem to be coming to that same conclusion all on their own.

This week, Taiwanese semiconductor giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSMC) posted its second-quarter earnings results, revealing a staggering revenue of over $40 billion — a record-breaking sum for the company.

While that should come as welcome news to investors, the results had the exact opposite effect, sending shares of TSMC stocks tumbling by four percent. That in turn led the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 index to fall by 1.4 percent Thursday, compounding losses from Wednesday, Bloomberg reported.

The issue seems to be TSMC’s revision to its capital expenditure. As the key manufacturer for chip design company Nvidia — arguably one of the most pivotal players in the AI boom — TSMC is a major bellwether for investor confidence around the buzzy tech.

The trouble is that, in addition to posting record revenue, the Taiwanese chip firm raised its 2026 spending forecast to a range of $60-64 billion, up from $52-56 billion. That shift will test how much more spending investors are willing to stomach on AI, a technology that has yet to justify the nearly $1.6 trillion spent developing it over the past decade.

Full article.

Futurism has also published an article about how the richest Tech billionaires are actually rooting for the AI bubble to collapse, so that the industry can be consolidated to just a few Big Tech companies.

This reminds me about how another technology breakthrough, the mass production of automobiles in the early 1900s, led to hundreds of companies producing automobiles in the “roaring 1920s”.

But a collapse in the economy reduced them to the “Big Three”, where every other business was wiped out by the financial crash just before WW II, which is now known as “The Great Depression” in U.S. history.

The number of active automobile manufacturers dropped from 253 in 1908 to only 44 in 1929, with about 80 percent of the industry’s output accounted for by Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler, formed from Maxwell in 1925 by Walter P. Chrysler.

Most of the remaining independents were wiped out in the Great Depression, with Nash, Hudson, Studebaker, and Packard hanging on only to collapse in the post-World War II period. (Source.)

Here is the article from Futurism:

Tech Billionaires Are Quietly Rooting for AI Bubble to Collapse

“Stop trying to make bubbles go away.”

Excerpts:

Some of the wealthiest business people in the world are chopping it up about something that defies orthodoxy: the AI bubble, they hope, will soon collapse.

Gone are the days of debating whether AI is an economic bubble.

Having already fallen $800 billion short of turning a profit on the AI boom, some of the tech industry’s biggest players have accepted that the financial arithmetic on AI just doesn’t add up. But here’s the catch: though the AI bubble objectively makes life harder for the rest of us, to the silicon valley elite, the economic consequences of its downfall could actually be a good thing.

New reporting by the Atlantic details the heterodox sentiment sweeping through the tech industry. The pro-Bubble stance has its roots in a 2024 book called “Boom: Bubbles and the End of Stagnation,” by tech investors Tobias Huber and Byrne Hobart.

These fellas argued that there are essentially two kinds of economic bubble: the good ones, like the Dot Com bubble, and the bad ones, like the 2008 subprime lending crisis.

Though both do significant economic damage when they burst, Huber and Hobart argue that bursting the good bubbles nonetheless helps accelerate technological progress in capitalist economies. With bubbles, Hobart told the Atlantic, a “set of investments that you could never underwrite otherwise suddenly makes sense.”

That attitude has helped tech executives and their investors rationalize away one of the most irrational concentrations of finance capital the US has seen in decades. “Stop trying to make bubbles go away,” as the venture capitalist James Thomason wrote last year. “Yes, bubbles create volatility. Yes, investors lose money. Yes, employees lose jobs when companies fail. But the alternative is underinvestment in transformative opportunities.”

Some of the biggest names in tech have signaled support. Last October, Amazon founder and CEO Jeff Bezos explained that bubbles “can even be good, because when the dust settles and you see who are the winners, societies benefits from those inventions.”

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has likewise argued that AI will a “huge net win for the economy” no matter what, even if a “phenomenal amount of money” ends up in the blender.

Of course, if the whole thing does come tumbling down, it‘s not the tech billionaires who will suffer. Some will go bankrupt, sure, but that just means less competition for market dominance. Each sees themselves as too big to fail — so when the bubble does burst, you can expect plenty of drama.

[…]

Via https://healthimpactnews.com/2026/china-ai-cheaper-than-u-s-big-tech-ai-exposing-ai-bubble-americans-rise-up-against-big-tech-with-flock-camera-opposition/