Did Trump Just Kill the Petrodollar?

Hasi Fiero

The 2026 Petrodollar to Petroyuan Pivot: Why the Strait of Hormuz Just Redrew the Global Financial Map

I. Introduction: The Ghost of 1974

In June 1974, a discreet arrangement between Washington and Riyadh effectively anchored the global economy for half a century. Following the “Nixon Shock”, the 1971 termination of the dollar’s gold convertibility, and the subsequent 1973 oil embargo, the U.S.-Saudi Arabian Joint Commission on Economic Cooperation established a “security-for-currency” pact. The terms were simple yet transformative: Saudi Arabia would price its oil exclusively in U.S. dollars and recycle those surpluses into U.S. Treasuries; in exchange, America provided a total security guarantee. The details of this arrangement were so sensitive they remained classified until 2016.

This birthed the “Petrodollar,” a system that forced every nation to hoard greenbacks to keep their lights on. But by early 2026, this foundation has not just fractured, it has been replaced by a chaotic reality where energy security and currency hegemony have been violently decoupled. A localized maritime dispute in the Middle East has metastasized into an existential threat to the dollar, revealing that while the U.S. can still win a naval battle, it is losing the war for the “invisible infrastructure” of global trade.

II. The Expiration of the “Security-for-Currency” Pact

The pillars of American economic hegemony reached a symbolic expiration point in mid-2024, marking exactly 50 years since the original joint commission. As the structural demand for the dollar shifted, Saudi Arabia began a measured pivot toward a multi-currency model, engaging in active discussions to price crude in yuan, euros, and yen.

This transition was rendered inevitable by the changing physics of global demand. China has emerged as the world’s largest oil importer, creating a gravitational pull for alternative payment systems that reflect physical commodity flows rather than 20th-century geopolitical loyalties. For decades, the U.S. enjoyed an “exorbitant privilege,” essentially exporting its inflation by requiring the world to hold its debt. Today, that privilege is eroding under the weight of a multipolar market where China acts as the economic guarantor for nations seeking to escape the “dollar trap.”

III. Operation Epic Fury: The Kinetic Catalyst

On February 28, 2026, the theoretical decline of the Petrodollar turned kinetic. A coordinated campaign of airstrikes, the U.S.-led “Operation Epic Fury” and the Israeli “Operation Lion’s Roar”, targeted Iranian leadership, resulting in the death of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. In the ensuing power vacuum, Mojtaba Khamenei seized control and implemented a strategy of “Selective Interdiction” in the Strait of Hormuz.

The paradox of the conflict became immediately apparent: while the U.S. military demonstrated absolute superiority by sinking seventeen Iranian naval vessels in the opening days, it could not stop the economic hemorrhage. The conflict is currently costing the U.S. Treasury nearly $900 million per day, even as the “invisible rails” of trade shift toward Beijing.

Metric of Disruption (March 2026)

In a masterful move of asymmetric financial warfare, Iran established a “Green Corridor.” While Western-linked vessels are targeted by low-cost drones, tankers bound for China are granted “Sovereign Immunity,” effectively turning Iran into the physical enforcer of a Chinese-centric trade route.

IV. The “Yuan Mandate”: Economic Warfare at the Chokepoint

On March 14, 2026, the crisis evolved from a blockade into a sophisticated reconfiguration of the global financial map. Iranian officials proposed a controlled reopening of the Strait, but with a singular, transformative condition: passage is permitted only for tankers whose cargo is traded in Chinese yuan.

This created a “Bifurcated Oil Market.” International buyers now face a binary choice: comply with U.S. financial regulations and suffer a catastrophic energy shortage, or embrace the yuan to secure safe passage. This “Yuan Condition” is a direct attempt to dismantle the foundational pillars of American financial power. It introduces a two-tier pricing system: a “War Premium” for those clinging to the dollar, and a “Safety Discount” for those willing to settle on Chinese rails.

V. The Petroyuan Shield: Dark Fleets and Digital Rails

To maintain this system under the pressure of maximum U.S. sanctions, a “Petroyuan Shield” has been deployed, a fusion of maritime evasion and digital settlement.

  • Geospatial Displacement: Following the targeting of the Kharg Island terminal by U.S.-Israeli forces, the Goreh-Jask pipeline and the Jask Oil Terminal became critical. By loading oil south of the Hormuz chokepoint, Iran has moved the “Point of Sale” outside the immediate kinetic impact zone.
  • The “Dark Fleet”: A fleet of tankers utilizing “Sanctuary Jurisdictions” and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) to circumvent Western detection, ensuring that 12 million barrels have already reached China despite the blockade.
  • CIPS & e-CNY: The Cross-Border Interbank Payment System and the digital yuan provide a closed-loop settlement layer, neutralizing the U.S. Treasury’s ability to freeze assets or monitor transactions.
  • Bank of Kunlun: Acting as the primary settlement hub, this institution maintains the liquidity of the Iranian security state, entirely insulated from the SWIFT network.

VI. mBridge: The “Strategic Surrender” of Western Finance

The technical backbone of this new order is Project mBridge, a blockchain-based platform for multi-central bank digital currencies. While Western finance remained tethered to legacy systems, the “mBridge Ledger” was built to handle the rails of 21st-century commodity trade. Analysts describe this as a “strategic surrender to Chinese financial technology.”

The Displacement of SWIFT:

  • Traditional SWIFT (The Legacy Model): 2–5 days for settlement; high costs via intermediaries; full visibility for the U.S. Treasury; high sanction risk.
  • mBridge (The Sovereign Digital Infrastructure): Real-time, peer-to-peer settlement; 50–70% lower transaction costs; encrypted and decentralized to reduce sanction vulnerability.

By November 2025, mBridge had already processed over $55.5 billion in transactions, with the digital yuan accounting for 95% of the volume. This platform allows the UAE and Saudi Arabia to continue trading with Asia while bypassing the volatility and political risks of the dollar-denominated world.

VII. Conclusion: A World of Two Suns

The 2026 crisis signals the end of the unipolar financial era. The 20th-century model of “security-for-currency” is being replaced by a 21st-century “commodity-for-digital-settlement” model. In this new landscape, the Petrodollar and the Petroyuan now coexist as two competing suns in a fragmented sky.

The events in the Strait of Hormuz have proven a bitter truth for the West: military superiority can clear a sea lane, but it cannot force a merchant to use a specific ledger. As the U.S. spends $900 million a day to maintain a presence in the Gulf, the “invisible infrastructure” of global trade has already migrated to a system where Washington has no jurisdiction.

[…]

Via https://newsletter.information-warfare.com/p/the-2026-petrodollar-to-petroyuan

Top US ‘counterterrorism’ official resigns, ‘cannot in good conscience’ back war on Iran

Press TV

Joseph Kent, the Trump administration’s director of the National Center for Counterterrorism (NCC), has resigned in protest over the US‑Israeli aggression against Iran.

In a post on the social media platform X on Tuesday, Kent wrote: “I cannot in good conscience support the war against Iran.”

“Iran posed no imminent threat to our country, and we entered this war because of Israel and pressure from its powerful American lobby,” he added.

Kent cautioned that continuing down this path would only deepen the crisis facing the United States.

“You can reverse course and chart a new path for our nation, or you can allow us to slip further towards decline and chaos,” he wrote in the letter addressed to Trump.

Kent’s resignation exposes widening divisions within Trump’s political base over the war and signals that serious questions about the justification for attacking Iran have spread to both senior administration officials and the US president’s core supporters.

Trump has offered shifting reasons for the strikes and has pushed back on claims that Israel forced the US to act.

Earlier this month, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., suggested that the White House believed Israel was determined to act on its own, leaving the Republican president with a “very difficult decision.”

The White House also had no immediate comment on Kent’s resignation.

The US and Israeli armed forces launched a joint military aggression against Iran in late February by attacking targets across Tehran, assassinating the Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei and several senior Iranian officials.

Since then, Iranian armed forces have retaliated swiftly by launching barrages of missiles and drones at Israeli‑occupied territories as well as US bases across the region.

According to Iran’s Ministry of Defense, Iranian forces have killed and injured at least 600 American troops at various US bases since the start of the aggression.

Iranian officials say targeting US military bases in the region constitutes “legitimate self‑defense.”

Referring to Article 51 of the United Nations Charter, they say the Islamic Republic has the legal right to defend itself against “acts of aggression” by the United States or the Israeli regime.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/03/17/765503/Top-S-counterterrorism-official-resigns-says-cannot-in-good-conscience-back-war-on-Iran

Iraqi resistance vows to continue fight until US occupiers expelled

Akram al-Kaabi, secretary general of Iraq’s Harakat Hezbollah al-Nujaba resistance group. (File photo)

Press TV

The Iraqi Islamic resistance group Harakat Hezbollah al‑Nujaba says the resistance will continue until the complete expulsion of occupying forces and the restoration of the country’s full sovereignty.

The secretary general of the resistance group, Akram al-Kaabi, said in a statement on Tuesday that the occupiers have wrongly assumed that the continued violation of Iraq’s sovereignty and repeated acts of aggression could derail, halt, or weaken the Islamic resistance movement’s legitimate struggle for liberation.

Kaabi said Iraq’s resistance is engaged in combat with “criminal occupiers” since 2003 and it has now emerged “more powerful, more experienced, and better-equipped.”

He said after the US was forced to withdraw its forces from Iraq, it created the Daesh Takfiri terrorist group “out of an inability to confront the resistance.”

Kaabi stated yet numerous powerful resistance groups successfully defeated the US Daesh project and “once again dismantled the occupying power’s colonial scheme.”

The secretary general reiterated that the resistance is still alive in Iraq, “conducting operations to expel occupiers, achieve complete national liberation, and restore the country’s deprived sovereignty.”

Since the US and Israel launched their joint military aggression against Iran on February 28, Iraqi resistance groups have mobilized to support the Islamic Republic.

The resistance groups across the region have been carrying out daily attacks on US assets in Iraq and across the West Asian region.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/03/17/765502/Iraq-resistance-vows-to-continue-fight-until-occupiers-are-expelled

Trump’s Board of Peace rallies ‘thousands’ of troops for Gaza deployment

Trump’s Board of Peace rallies ‘thousands’ of troops for Gaza deployment

RT

US President Donald Trump has said members of his newly formed Board of Peace have pledged “thousands of personnel” and billions of dollars to a potential international stabilization force that will be tasked with administering Gaza.

In a post on Truth Social on Sunday, Trump said countries taking part in the initiative will formalize their commitments at a meeting on February 19 in Washington, describing the deployment as part of efforts to maintain “security and peace” in the Palestinian enclave.

“Member States have pledged more than $5 BILLION DOLLARS toward the Gaza Humanitarian and Reconstruction efforts, and have committed thousands of personnel to the International Stabilization Force and Local Police,” he wrote, adding that Hamas must uphold its commitment to full and immediate “demilitarization.”

Trump did not identify which nations have pledged troops or funding. However, Indonesia’s military said it has 8,000 personnel on standby, potentially making it the first country to formally commit forces if the government gives formal approval.

“Our troops are fully prepared and can be dispatched at short notice once the government gives formal approval,” Army spokesman Brigadier General Donny Pramono told AP on Sunday.

The ‘Board of Peace’ was formally established in mid-January as part of a Gaza peace roadmap, but Trump envisages the body as a quasi-alternative to the UN, with influence stretching “far beyond.”

Trump named himself chairman and invited dozens of foreign leaders to join what he described as
Israel has reportedly accepted an invitation, while several European nations – including France, Germany, Italy, Sweden, and the UK – have declined. Russia has confirmed that it received an invitation and said it is studying the proposal. Permanent membership beyond the initial three years will reportedly require contributions of $1 billion.

The US-led body is intended to oversee reconstruction, security, and political transition in the enclave, but critics have questioned its mandate and the absence of Palestinian political representation. Hamas has said it is committed to the peace process but will only disarm if Israeli forces withdraw from the enclave.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/632592-trump-peace-board-thousands-troops/

Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’ for Gaza: Who is in and who is out?

Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’ for Gaza: Who is in and who is out?

RT

US President Donald Trump has convened a new ‘Board of Peace’ to guide what he calls Gaza stabilization and reconstruction, drawing participation from dozens of countries across the Middle East, Asia, and Europe. While some key US allies are joining, major Western powers have declined full membership, some due to divisions over the board’s role relative to the United Nations.

The board has pledged $5 billion toward rebuilding war-ravaged Gaza and will commit thousands of personnel to international stabilization and police forces for the territory.

Formally established in mid-January as part of Trump’s Gaza peace roadmap, permanent membership beyond the initial three years reportedly requires a contribution of $1 billion. Critics have questioned the board’s mandate and the absence of Palestinian political representation.

Trump said during his speech inaugurating the panel that is the “most consequential” grouping of world leaders ever formed. He added that some countries are “playing cute” by not having joined yet, including some that he does not even want to be in the body, despite having invited them.

Who sits on Trump’s Board of Peace?

The White House has formally invited 50 countries to join the board, with roughly 35 expressing interest so far. Reports indicate that around 26 countries have reportedly formally joined and are designated as founding members, and sent representatives to the inaugural meeting in Washington.

Two EU member states that accepted invitations are Hungary and Bulgaria, with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, a close ally of Trump, attending in person. Kosovo and Albania are also participating.

The board’s inaugural session in Washington drew participating country representatives, ranging from heads of state such as Argentinean President Javier Milei, Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, to lower-ranking officials, along with members of the US Executive Board overseeing operational planning.

Major Middle Eastern partners on the board include Israel (represented by Foreign Minister Gideon Saar), the United Arab Emirates, Morocco, Bahrain, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, Jordan, Qatar, and Kuwait – all of whom sent delegations to the first session.

From Asia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Cambodia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Pakistan – represented by Prime Minister Shehbaz  Sharif – attended.

Russia has confirmed that it received an invitation and said it is studying the proposal.

An Executive Board of key Trump administration figures is supporting operational planning, including Trump’s son in law Jared Kushner, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, special envoy Steve Witkoff, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, World Bank President Ajay Banga, and other senior advisers overseeing reconstruction, governance, and investment portfolios tied to the board’s mandate.

Are Palestinians involved in the Board of Peace?

No Palestinian representatives have been placed on the Board of Peace, nor on the parallel Gaza Executive Board. Neither Hamas nor the Palestinian Authority (PA), including PA leader Mahmoud Abbas, were invited to join.

The only Palestinian representation is on the separate National Committee for the Administration of Gaza, which includes Palestinians as heads of various services in the proposed ‘New Gaza’.

According to a Palestinian source speaking to the Times of Israel, Washington has only approved the establishment of a coordination committee between the PA and the Board. The committee ought to formalize ties between the PA and the Board of Peace, which is overseeing the postwar reconstruction of Gaza. PA Prime Minister Mohammed Mustafa will represent Ramallah on the panel, and Gaza High Representative Nickolay Mladenov is to represent the Board of Peace, the two officials said.

After Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pledged to join the board, the move drew criticism, particularly given that his office had previously questioned the composition of its executive committee. Responding on February 11, senior Hamas official Osama Hamdan told Al Jazeera that Netanyahu’s participation in the council was “the farce of the era.”

The Palestinian human rights organization Al-Haq has also described Trump’s peace plan as a “dark day for the international community.”

“Rather than ensuring an immediate and unconditional end to Israel’s unlawful occupation… the plan extends, deepens, and internationalizes it,” it said in a statement.

Who has declined Board of Peace membership?

Several Western powers and prominent global actors have refused or are holding off, citing concerns about the breadth of the board’s charter and potential overlap with the United Nations.

The EU is not joining; European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen declined to come to the inaugural meeting, while a European commissioner’s attendance sparked controversy among bloc members, who had not authorized the official’s visit. France, Germany, the UK, and Spain have all declined full membership.

The Vatican has also declined, saying that the Gaza crisis response should remain under UN auspices.

Other countries explicitly declining or awaiting clarification include New Zealand (which declined outright) and Australia (still reviewing). Several Western governments that did accept invitations are limiting participation to non-member observer roles rather than full membership.

Five countries are ready to deploy peacekeepers to Gaza, US Major-General Jasper Jeffers has said during the meeting. “The first five countries have committed troops to serve in the ISF – Indonesia, Morocco, Kazakhstan, Kosovo and Albania. Two countries have committed to train police – Egypt and Jordan,” he said.

He added that the ISF would begin by deploying in southern Gaza’s Rafa, train police there and “expand sector by sector.”

The long-term plan is to use 20,000 ISF troops and train 12,000 police, Jeffers said.

The original idea behind the board was to execute Trump’s blueprint for postwar Gaza, which he outlined in a 20-point peace plan in September. Trump says member nations have already pledged $5 billion toward rebuilding the territory, while the United Nations has estimated the cost at more than $50 billion.

The board is also to deliver humanitarian assistance, set up security mechanisms, and lay the foundation for economic recovery in Gaza. It wants a technocratic administration for the enclave almost fully destroyed in three years of war, managed by international experts rather than elected officials.

Trump is the chairman and a member for life.

“Each member state shall serve a term of no more than three years from this charter’s entry into force, subject to renewal by the chairman,” states the document, first reported by Bloomberg News. “The three-year membership term shall not apply to member states that contribute more than $1,000,000,000 in cash funds to the board of peace within the first year of the charter’s entry into force.”

Under the draft charter, membership of the board is restricted to states invited by the chair. The chair would also be granted sweeping powers, including the authority to remove member states – subject to a two-thirds veto by the board – and to appoint a successor in the event of their own departure.

Is Trump’s Board of Peace a rival to the UN?

The board has also drawn criticism over taking aim at existing international institutions, including the UN. The charter’s board says the committee must have “the courage to depart from approaches and institutions that have too often failed.”

Trump himself has long been a vocal critic of the UN and earlier in January announced that the US would withdraw from 66 international organizations and treaties, around half of which are affiliated with the UN system.

Asked in late January if the board could replace the UN, Trump said: “It might… The UN just hasn’t been very helpful. It’s just never lived up to its potential.”

On Wednesday, UN diplomats convened in New York a day earlier than originally scheduled to avoid overlapping with Trump’s Board of Peace meeting in Washington. During this session, they reaffirmed the UN’s crucial role in addressing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, even as the new US-led initiative aims to reshape global mediation efforts.

The UN undersecretary-general for political and peacebuilding affairs, Rosemary DiCarlo, referred to the moment as “pivotal,” highlighting it as a rare opportunity for the region to change direction after more than two years of conflict. However, she warned that the outcome will depend on decisions made in the coming weeks.

Several council members also condemned Israel’s recent steps to expand its control over the West Bank, with Pakistan calling the moves “null and void” under international law.

What does Moscow think?

Russian President Vladimir Putin said that he had received a personal appeal from Trump inviting him to join the board.

“As for our participation in the council, Russia’s Foreign Ministry has been instructed to study the documents we have received, consult with our strategic partners on this matter, and only after that will we be able to give an answer to the invitation that has been extended to us,” he said.

According to Putin, the primary focus should concern settlement in the Middle East, as well as finding ways to address the pressing problems of the Palestinian people and resolving the “most acute” humanitarian issues in Gaza. Putin emphasized the importance of ensuring that the entire process ultimately contributes positively to resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Putin also said that Russia would be prepared to allocate $1 billion to the “Peace Council” from funds frozen in the US.

Moscow has sent Washington an official note authorizing the use of the frozen assets for projects in Gaza but has not received a response, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/632794-gaza-trump-peace-board/

Hamas meets Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’ for first time

Hamas meets Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’ for first time – Reuters

 

RT

Hamas has held its first talks with the newly established US‑led Board of Peace, as the postwar Gaza reconstruction plan comes under strain from the Iran war and continued Israeli strikes on the enclave, Reuters has reported.

The Board of Peace – an international body formally established in mid‑January as part of US President Donald Trump’s Gaza peace roadmap – includes business figures and officials from multiple countries. Critics have questioned its mandate and the absence of Palestinian political representation. The board’s activities have largely been put on hold in recent weeks, as Muslim member states voiced anger over the US‑Israeli bombardment of Iran and debated whether to remain involved.

According to Reuters, citing its sources on Monday, the meeting took place late last week at an undisclosed location in the region and focused on salvaging elements of Trump’s initiative, including a long‑term ceasefire and a reconstruction program overseen by the board. The talks were described as preliminary, with no concrete breakthrough announced.

Hamas officials reportedly used the encounter to demand the reopening of Gaza’s Rafah crossing with Egypt, which Israel shut following its airstrikes on Iran. The militant group reportedly warned that if Rafah remains closed and humanitarian access is not restored, it could walk away from the ceasefire agreements. 

Despite the formal truce that ended Israel’s two‑year war in Gaza last October, the IDF has continued to carry out strikes. At least 12 people, including children, were reportedly killed in attacks on Sunday, adding to a post-ceasefire death toll of more than 600. The overall figures exceed 72,000, according to the enclave’s health officials. 

The Gaza war erupted after Hamas‑led militants attacked southern Israel on October 7, 2023, killing around 1,200 people and taking more than 250 hostages. Israel responded with a massive air and ground campaign and a blockade that severely restricted food, fuel and medical supplies, prompting accusations of genocide.

At its inaugural meeting last month, the board pledged more than $7 billion for rebuilding Gaza and promised to deploy thousands of personnel to international stabilization and police forces in the territory. While over two dozen countries have formally joined, major Western powers have mostly declined full membership. Russia has not formally joined but said it had received an invitation and was studying the proposal.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/635218-hamas-gaza-trump-peace-board/

Trump calls for help securing Strait of Hormuz, but no country has committed yet

 

RT

US President Donald Trump has said that he has asked ‘about seven’ countries to join a coalition to police the Strait of Hormuz.

In a Sunday interview, he warned that NATO faces a “very bad” future if US allies fail to assist in securing the vital waterway currently blocked by Iran, which normally allows for 20 percent of the world’s oil to be shipped from the Persian Gulf.

None have responded to Trump’s request for assistance. While EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said that it’s in Europe’s “interest” to keep the Strait of Hormuz open, she added that “it is out of NATO’s area of action” and that “there are no NATO countries in the Strait of Hormuz.”

A German government spokesperson said this morning that “this war has nothing to do with NATO” and that “it is not NATO’s war.” British Prime Minister Keir Starmer mulled over “a viable collective plan,” while not saying anything concrete.

Meanwhile, global oil prices are trading above $100 per barrel, more than 40% higher than before the Iran War began, stoking fears of a deeper energy crisis.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/635011-iran-us-israel-war-updates/

Aerial nightmare: How Iran, resistance axis destroyed fleet of US KC-135 Stratotankers

By Yousef Ramazani

In the span of just three days, Iran and the Axis of Resistance delivered the most devastating blow to American aerial logistics since the Vietnam War, destroying six KC-135 Stratotankers and damaging the seventh in coordinated strikes that have exposed the fatal vulnerability at the heart of the US-Israeli aggression against Iran.

It began on March 12, 2026, when the Islamic Resistance in Iraq, in coordination with the Iranian armed forces, launched a precision missile strike, sending a KC-135 plummeting from the skies over western Iraq. All six American crew members aboard were killed in the attack.

Two days later, on March 14, Iranian ballistic missiles pummelled the Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia, destroying five more Stratotankers on the tarmac in a single devastating salvo.

The numbers tell a stark story: seven of America’s most strategically vital aircraft lost or damaged, thirteen American service members dead, and the entire logistical architecture of Operation Epic Fury thrown into disarray.

This is the inside story of how the tanker war became America’s worst nightmare.

The unglamorous workhorse of American air power

The KC-135 Stratotanker is not a weapon of thunderous strikes or stealthy infiltration. It is a gangly, 1950s-era aircraft, an awkward military adaptation of the first commercial jetliners.

Based on the Boeing 367-80, the same design lineage as the 707, it is essentially a flying fuel tank with wings.

Yet in the 21st century, and particularly in the high-stakes geography of the Persian Gulf, this elderly workhorse has become the single most critical component of American air power.

The numbers are impressive: up to 90,700 kilograms of transferable fuel, cruising at 850 kilometers per hour, operating at altitudes up to 15,000 meters, launching at a maximum gross weight of 146,000 kilograms.

Its flying boom is optimized for Air Force receivers, but the aircraft can also refuel probe-equipped platforms using a drogue adapter, bridging service-specific architectures and turning joint air campaigns into truly integrated operations.

The US Air Force has invested heavily in keeping the fleet viable. The most significant upgrade replaced the original turbojets with modern CFM-56 turbofans on the KC-135R and T variants. This transformation increased fuel offload capacity by 50 percent, improved fuel efficiency by 25 percent, and drastically reduced the maintenance footprint.

In the context of the aggression against Iran, this efficiency meant a tanker could loiter on station for hours longer, covering strike packages engaging in dynamic targeting deep inside Iranian territory. It was an asset the Pentagon believed was safe, operating from “secure” bases far from the front lines. They were disastrously wrong.

Each Stratotanker carries a crew of three – pilot, co-pilot, and boom operator – who lies prone in the tail guiding the refueling boom into the receptacle of the receiving aircraft. These are highly specialized professionals, their skills honed over years of training. Their loss is felt acutely throughout the refueling community.

The US Air Force manages a fleet of approximately 396 KC-135s spread across active duty, the Air National Guard, and the Reserve. Each aircraft is a finite and precious asset that cannot be quickly replaced. Each crew member, even more so.

What is the KC-135’s role in this war of aggression?

To understand why the destruction of these seven aircraft represents such a catastrophic blow to Operation Epic Fury, one must understand the unforgiving arithmetic of aerial warfare in the Persian Gulf region, according to military experts.

A strike package taking off from a base in the Persian Gulf or from an aircraft carrier in the Arabian Sea might just be able to reach targets in Iran without refueling, but they would do so with minimal fuel reserves, no ability to loiter, and a desperate, fuel-critical dash back to safety.

The Stratotanker obliterates these constraints. By loitering in established refueling tracks over western Iraq, Saudi Arabia, or international airspace, the tanker allows fighter-bombers like the F-15E and F-16 to take off fully loaded with weapons rather than fuel.

They meet the tanker en route, top off their tanks, press deep into Iranian airspace, and then refuel again on the egress before landing. This effectively brings the entire Persian landmass within striking distance.

Without the KC-135, the concept of a sustained strategic bombing campaign against a country the size of Iran would be logistically impossible.

On March 12, just hours before the first tanker was shot down, US Central Command released imagery showing a KC-135 refueling a Navy F/A-18F Super Hornet during Operation Epic Fury over the Middle East.

The aerial refueling mission highlighted how joint tanker support sustains strike tempo and extends combat endurance. The tanker in that pairing was far more than airborne logistics.

A carrier-based jet that tanks en route or on station can hold in a patrol box longer, wait for a time-sensitive target, escort other strike packages deeper inland, or recover with greater tactical flexibility instead of being pulled home by fuel state alone.

In Operation Epic Fury, KC-135s refueling F/A-18Fs means more time on station, more options for commanders, better responsiveness against fleeting targets, and a greater ability to keep pressure on Iranian air defense and missile networks without constantly resetting the air picture.

That is why the refueling pass matters. It is not a backdrop to the operation. It is one of the mechanisms that makes the operation sustainable.

At least 40 of these aircraft have been operating directly out of the Israeli regime’s Ben Gurion Airport, a clear indication of the integration of the US and Israeli air campaigns.

The operational tempo has been described as intense, with approximately 75 percent of the entire US tanker fleet airborne in the weeks leading up to the aggression, pre-positioning for the massive fuel demands of the aggression.

How were they lost to enemy fire?

The first strike came on March 12, 2026, when the Islamic Resistance in Iraq, in close coordination with the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC), executed a precision missile attack against a KC-135 Stratotanker operating in western Iraq.

The spokesman for the Central Headquarters of Iran’s Military announced that the US military refueling plane was shot down by a missile fired by resistance groups, stating unequivocally that all six American service members on board the aircraft were killed in the strike.

IRGC’s public relations wing elaborated in a formal statement that its air defense systems, operating under the umbrella of the Resistance Front, successfully targeted the Boeing KC-135 at the precise moment it was engaged in refueling an aggressor fighter jet.

This detail is crucial, as it demonstrates the tactical sophistication of the Resistance Front, striking at the exact moment when the tanker was most vulnerable and when its loss would have maximum impact on ongoing combat operations.

The Islamic Resistance in Iraq formally claimed responsibility for the attack, framing the action as a defensive measure taken in defense of the country’s sovereignty and airspace.

The timing was particularly devastating for American morale, as the downing occurred just hours after the US Central Command had proudly released imagery of KC-135s refueling strike aircraft, projecting an image of seamless air superiority.

Within hours, that narrative lay in flames somewhere in the deserts of western Iraq.

Two days later, on March 14, a barrage of Iranian missiles struck again, this time targeting the logistics hub itself. Ballistic missiles rained down on Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia, a key hub for US expeditionary forces.

According to reports confirmed by US officials, the strike caught five KC-135 Stratotankers on the ground, damaging them severely.

While the aircraft were not completely destroyed, they sustained significant damage requiring extensive repairs, effectively removing them from operational service at a critical moment in the campaign.

The strike at Prince Sultan Air Base demonstrates the sophisticated Iranian strategy. Rather than just targeting fighter jets in air-to-air combat, Iran is striking the logistical nodes that enable the entire American air campaign.

By damaging multiple tankers on the ground in a single precision salvo, Iran aims to ground the fighters in the air.

The attack, which Saudi air defenses failed to intercept, highlights the growing reach and precision of Tehran’s missile arsenal and the inability of American allies to protect US assets.

Global flight trackers monitoring the region between March 12 and March 16 reveal the immediate impact of these strikes. The Stratotankers now dare not enter Iraqi airspace.

Instead, they glide along the southern border, staying within Saudi airspace, unwilling to risk the fate that befell their sister ship just days earlier.

This visible avoidance of Iraqi airspace provides irrefutable evidence that the Resistance Front’s air defense capabilities are real and that the March 12 downing was indeed the result of hostile fire, despite American attempts to deny the obvious.

How significant is loss for the US military?

The destruction of six KC-135s and the damage to a seventh represent far more than a simple tally of lost aircraft. These seven tankers were not just airplanes; they were the fuel supply lines for the entire US air campaign.

The US Air Force manages approximately 396 KC-135s, meaning this single week of Resistance operations has removed nearly two percent of the entire strategic tanker fleet from service. In the high-stakes arithmetic of modern air warfare, that is a devastating loss.

The human cost is equally significant, with the six crew members of the downed KC-135 representing one of the deadliest single incidents for US airmen in this aggression.

Each of those crew members was a specialist whose skills cannot be quickly replaced. The boom operator who lies prone in the tail of the aircraft, guiding the fuel boom into receivers with precision, requires years of training and experience. Their loss is felt acutely in a community where such expertise is rare and valuable.

Trump’s response on March 14 revealed the extent of American embarrassment.

In a statement attacking the Fake News Media, the president claimed that the five tanker planes at Prince Sultan Air Base were not struck or destroyed, asserting that four of the five had virtually no damage and were already back in service.

Yet satellite imagery and confirmed reporting from US officials contradict this narrative. The aircraft were damaged, they are under repair, and they are not available for combat operations. The president’s desperate denial only underscores the magnitude of the humiliation.

The US has begun relocating portions of its refueling fleet from Prince Sultan Air Base, a move that underscores the shifting risk calculus as Iran and the regional resistance demonstrate their ability to hit high-value targets deep inside US operating zones.

When the world’s most powerful military is forced to reposition its assets out of range of Iranian missiles, the strategic balance has clearly shifted.

The death toll since the aggression escalated now stands at 13, with more than 140 wounded, including eight service members suffering severe injuries.

These numbers will continue to grow as the Resistance Front maintains its pressure on American logistics. The pattern is now clear: Iran and the regional resistance are targeting the logistical backbone of US power projection, refueling aircraft, fixed bases, and command infrastructure, while Washington struggles to maintain operational tempo and regional deterrence.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/03/16/765441/aerial-nightmare-how-iran-resistance-axis-destroyed-fleet-us-kc-135-tankers

 

Iranian Foreign Minister: Any country except US and Israel can pass through Strait of Hormuz

Several tanker ships, including the Luojiashan, anchored in Muscat.

By Geoff Earle

Iran said Saturday that all  countries besides the US and Israel may pass through the Strait of Hormuz, in a desperate attempt at coalition busting less than a day after the US bombed military targets on its oil-critical Kharg Island.

“As a matter of fact, the Strait of Hormuz is open,” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said.

“It is only closed to the tankers and ships belong[ing] to our enemies, to those who are attacking us and their allies. Others are free to pass,” Araghchi told MS NOW.

President Trump has threatened to destroy Iran’s oil infrastructure on  Kharg Island energy hub — through which  90% of its oil exports pass — if it refuses to allow safe passage.

Araghchi noted that many ships “prefer” not to undertake the journey due to “security concerns,” but insisted, “this has nothing to do with us.”

“And I can say that the Strait is not closed, but it is only closed to American, Israeli, you know, ships and tankers, and not to others.”

[…]

Via https://nypost.com/2026/03/14/world-news/any-country-except-for-us-and-israel-can-pass-through-strait-of-hormuz-iranian-foreign-minister-says/

No peace until US moves out of Persian Gulf

No peace until US moves out of Persian Gulf – senior Iranian official

Press TV

For the ongoing conflict between Iran and the US to conclude, the latter must withdraw its military forces from the Persian Gulf, according to a member of the advisory board of Iran’s supreme leader.

Mohsen Rezaee, a retired major general and former commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), added that Tehran would also seek full restitution for the damage done and ironclad security guarantees from Washington.

In an interview with Iran’s SNN TV broadcaster published on Saturday, the member of the Expediency Discernment Council said that the “presence of the US in the Persian Gulf has been the main cause of insecurity over the past 50 years.”

“The end of the war is also in our hands,” Rezaee claimed, naming the “US withdrawal from the Persian Gulf” among the key prerequisites. Additionally, Iran expects to receive reparations from the US, he added.

According to Rezaee, the Islamic Republic has managed to “shatter America’s prestige,” and will eventually emerge from the ongoing conflict as a power with “greater stature in the region.”

In a post on X on Wednesday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian similarly wrote that the “only way to end this war… is recognizing Iran’s legitimate rights, payment of reparations, and firm [international] guarantees against future aggression.”

The following day, Iranian media released the first public address of the newly appointed supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, in which he, too, vowed to “extract reparations from the enemy.”

Meanwhile, in a post on his Truth Social platform last Friday, US President Donald Trump stated that “there will be no deal with Iran except UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER.”

The US and Israeli militaries launched massive airstrikes on Iran on February 28, killing Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and several senior commanders.

On the first days of the military campaign, a suspected US Tomahawk cruise missile razed the Shajarah Tayyebeh girls’ school, killing at least 175 people, most of them children. According to Iranian authorities, more than 1,300 civilians have lost their lives in the US-Israeli strikes.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/635003-no-peace-until-us-withdraws-persian-gulf-iranian-official/