Erin Brokovich’s New Battle Against AI Datacentres

Guardian, Mon 29 Jun 2026

What is certain, though, is that the land cannot withstand these centres’ immense demand for water. According to analysis by the Guardian, two-thirds of planned datacentres in the US are in drought-stricken areas. The larger centres need up to 5m gallons of water a day for cooling, equivalent to the average usage of 50,000 people. It is unclear what the plan is and whose needs will take priority between AI, agriculture and everyone else.

In 1993, she squeezed a $333m settlement from a Californian energy company in a scandal over contaminated water. Three decades later, she has a new target in her sights – and it’s global

When Erin Brockovich woke to find 30 emails from people from the same town, she realised something was going on. People email Brockovich all the time because of what happened in 1993, when she was instrumental in suing Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) on behalf of residents of the town of Hinkley, California, whose groundwater had been contaminated. The case resulted in a settlement of $333m – then the largest ever payout for a direct-action lawsuit. When she was immortalised by Julia Roberts in the 2000 film Erin Brockovich, she became the hero we didn’t know we needed, a modern day Joan of Arc. She had won against PG&E with no formal legal training.

The emails she received a few weeks ago were about datacentres. In April, she put a callout on her website asking for anyone with concerns about one near them to get in touch. Within a month, 3,862 people had replied. Tech companies have needed datacentres to power their technology “for ever”, she says, but the new ones being built to power AI? “This feels like Hinkley on steroids.”

This isn’t a story about AI, she says. “That genie is out of the bottle: it’s here, it’s an effective tool, you can use it or not,” Brockovich says matter-of-factly. This is about the massive structures being built to house the vast computing facilities AI requires. These datacentres, she says, stretch over “hundreds and hundreds of acres”. In May, Utah gave approval to a centre twice the size of Manhattan.

Some of the emails Brockovich gets from people near datacentres express genuine bafflement: “Why did I not know about this? How did this construction just start? Why am I now getting a notice from the city council that this has already passed when I didn’t even have a voice in it?” Others reflect concerns about the impact of the centres: “What about our resources? What’s happening to the water? Who’s paying for all this energy and am I going to foot that bill? What will the future impact on health be from these monstrosities? What’s going to happen to the wildlife?”

From the emails, Brockovich built a map of significant AI datacentres in the US that are either operational or under construction, overlaid with locations where community members have emailed in concerns. This open-source document is chilling: as of 24 June, 33 AI datacenters have been completed and are operational, 68 are under construction and 41 are proposed. And there had been 7,005 reports submitted through the online form, which is to say, all that is known about them is what people have seen. As a post on her Substack blog is headlined: “If data centers are so great, why are they being built in secret?”

“It’s happening in every US state, multiple counties, rural areas, ranches, farms and neighbourhoods. People watch nature because they respect it, they need it. And they’re watching it being destroyed,” says Brockovich. She has heard from people saying: “I’m concerned this is where the bald eagles nest,” “I’m watching wildlife disappear,” “I’m seeing dead animals.” Some communities learn about a centre months after it has been approved; others don’t hear anything about them and watch as a vast building emerges.

What is certain, though, is that the land cannot withstand these centres’ immense demand for water. According to analysis by the Guardian, two-thirds of planned datacentres in the US are in drought-stricken areas. The larger centres need up to 5m gallons of water a day for cooling, equivalent to the average usage of 50,000 people. It is unclear what the plan is and whose needs will take priority between AI, agriculture and everyone else.

“People are reporting bill spikes,” Brockovich says, reading an email from someone who says their monthly water bill went from $22 (£17) to more than $350 (£265). The threat of these centres is about more than money – it feels existential. “How will the water use disrupt the balance of nature? People are asking: “What will happen to us?”

[…]

After Hinkley, she worked on other environmental pollution cases against PG&E related to hexavalent chromium, the chemical that contaminated Hinkley’s water. More recently, she has focused on Pfas (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), “forever chemicals” that are a component in firefighting foam used heavily on US military bases. Pfas have been linked to health problems, including fertility issues and some cancers. In 2017, communities living near military bases reported worrying levels of these chemicals in their drinking water.

Brockovich’s renown is plainly the reason people email her when they have concerns. This is what led her to north-west Georgia last year, where staggeringly high levels of Pfas were found in the water and the wider environment. It was believed that they came from carpet factories that used stain-resistant chemicals. The major carpet factories say they complied with all regulations and no longer use Pfas. She is still supporting people there with their campaigns.

Unlike toxic chemicals leaking into water, nothing about datacentres is discreet. Signs that might be subtle one day – an absence of birdsong – the next day will be a centre up and running at full volume. “It really becomes about the noise, the decibels,” Brockovich says. People will write to her and say: “We’re going insane 24/7,” “It’s got to stop,” “It’s humming, it’s hissing, it’s buzzing.” She says: “It’s generators. It’s increased electric bills. It’s power surges.”

These structures are appearing without the consultation you would need to erect a new sports hall, as if people won’t notice. But people certainly will notice, because the buildings are vast. It feels like a step into post-democracy, which is a tech bro fantasy, a world in which laws and regulations have been obviated. The big tech companies seem to have blueprinted their fantasy and started building it.

Alternatives are now being mooted. “People are talking about putting them at the bottom of the ocean,” says Brockovich. “They’re talking about having barges and putting the datacentres there, using waves as the energy in cooler climates. Elon Musk wants to put them in space.” But with innumerable Earth-based datacentres already built or in the works, this feels like puff – the future you could have had, had you not sleepwalked into the one that has arrived.

For Brockovich, this is all a distraction. The first thing she wants is a case-by-case moratorium on approving datacentres. ( (She is collating these cases through her open-source mapping site and says councils vary in the action they are prepared to take, according to how surprised by, or receptive to, local complaints their officials are. Many states are only now stopping to consider whether there should be state-level regulation and oversight of datacentres – and, if so, what implications that would have for local decision-making and autonomy.

This takes time. Seventy-nine municipalities in the US have so far have issued moratoriums, many immediately being hit with lawsuits for breaking their original deal. Pauses have been introduced in Georgia, Maryland, Michigan and South Carolina – one introduced in Maine was then vetoed – but these are early interventions against tech behemoths.

When I ask Brockovich about the political climate – a president committed to AI and blatantly dismissive of environmental concerns – she is careful to stress that opposition to datacentres is bipartisan. She knows from her work fighting Pfas, though, that a change in administration can make an enormous difference to the success of these campaigns. In the final days of Joe Biden’s presidency, a clean-up operation was announced by the Pentagon. However, this plan has quietly been delayed by Donald Trump’s Department of Defense: in some areas, it won’t start until 2039.

Yet the nature of Brockovich’s campaigning is not to go straight to the top and demand policy change, but rather to build lawsuits from the ground up. Victory, to her, is won by way of a pragmatic to-do list. To start, she would go to local government and say: “I’d like to see an environmental-impact report. I’d like to see how you propose to power all this. Are you going to build your own power? Are you relying on our already strained resources?” She says: “Let’s get that information first and then have a town hall meeting where the people can be a voice in it.” She has a degree of confidence that the law still has teeth. “Lawsuits aren’t settling for $333m any more; they’re settling for billions,” she says.

Brockovich’s datacentre work goes beyond the US; she has been contacted by people in Australia, India, Scotland and Ireland. There is already a moratorium on any more datacentres in Dublin; even by 2023, such centres were accounting for a fifth of Ireland’s electricity usage. “This is a planetary thing,” she says. “It’s overwhelming. We have to have some courage to show up, and it’s difficult to do that when you’re up against forces that have all the money and all the intelligence and all the bandwidth in the world.” She, meanwhile, is “getting too old for this, by the way. I’m in my legacy phase. I have six grandchildren.”

[…]

Via https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/jun/29/were-up-against-forces-that-have-all-the-money-in-the-world-erin-brockovich-on-her-battle-against-ai-datacentres

Study Finds Sunscreen Use Linked to Higher Risk of Multiple Skin Cancers

A 470,000+ person study found sunscreen users faced dramatically higher risk of melanoma, basal cell carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma — even after accounting for major skin cancer risk factors.

A UK Biobank study involving over 470,000 people found that individuals who reported using sunscreen more frequently had substantially higher risk of multiple skin cancers — even after researchers accounted for major confounding factors like age, sex, skin type, tanning ability, sunburn history, sunlamp use, and time spent outdoors.

The findings are worrisome:

MELANOMA: +292% higher risk (RR = 3.92)

BASAL CELL CARCINOMA: +140% higher risk (RR = 2.40)

SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA: +126% higher risk (RR = 2.26)

The researchers categorized sun protection habits from “never/rarely” to “always” and found the strongest associations among the most frequent sunscreen users.

In other words: the more sunscreen use reported, the higher the observed skin cancer risk.

This was an observational study, meaning it cannot prove sunscreen directly caused cancer. However, the study was also not a simplistic comparison of random sunscreen users versus non-users. Researchers statistically accounted for many of the biggest known skin cancer risk factors — including skin color, hair color, tanning ability, childhood sunburns, tanning bed exposure, outdoor time, age, and sex.

Even after all of that, the association remained.

Many chemical sunscreens contain hormone disruptors that are rapidly absorbed into the bloodstream, including compounds like oxybenzone, octocrylene, and homosalate.

Some formulations have also been found contaminated with benzene, a known human carcinogen.

And then there is the vitamin D issue. Sunlight is how the human body produces vitamin D, a hormone precursor involved in immune regulation, cellular repair, inflammation control, and cancer defense. People who never receive sunlight exposure without sunscreen are likely to become vitamin D deficient.

That does not mean people should recklessly burn in the sun. Sunburns are clearly harmful. Aim for sensible sunlight exposure — spending enough time in the sun reap the benefits without reaching the point of burning. If you’ll be out in the sun for hours on end during mid summer, consider opting for zinc-based (mineral) sunscreens rather than heavily absorbed chemical formulations.

[…]

Via https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/study-finds-sunscreen-use-linked

Sen. Ron Johnson Demands Journal Turn Over Records Related to SIDs and Vaccines Study

screenshot of removed journal and question mark

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) is demanding to know why a 2021 peer-reviewed paper that presented data suggesting a possible link between vaccination and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) was recently removed from the Toxicology Reports website.

In a letter dated June 29 and made public today, Johnson called on the editor-in-chief of Toxicology Reports and the CEO of Elsevier, which owns the journal, to release all records related to the decision to remove vaccine researcher Neil Z. Miller’s analysis: “Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database 1990-2019 and review of the medical literature.”

The analysis showed that from 1990 to 2019, many more SIDS reports were filed in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in the first few days after vaccination compared to later on after vaccination.

The paper also included a comprehensive review of the scientific literature on vaccines and SIDS, including documentation of large increases in SIDS rates following the rollout of national immunization campaigns and numerous case reports of SIDS in babies who were recently vaccinated.

Toxicology Reports published Miller’s analysis in June 2021 after it passed the peer-review process.

Johnson, who recently held a hearing about attacks on published science, noted that Miller’s paper had been criticized on PubPeer, a platform critics have nicknamed “PubSmear.”

He also noted that on June 11, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. also wrote to Toxicology Reports’ editor-in-chief demanding details about the process leading up to the journal’s removal of Miller’s analysis.

Kennedy also asked the journal to clarify why it opted to remove the article, rather than issue an expression of concern or a retraction.

‘No one has engaged with the data. They simply made the paper disappear.’

On April 9, Toxicology Reports posted a removal notice for Miller’s article, citing “serious methodological flaws.”

Miller told The Defender why he believes the removal was unjustified. He said:

“The core findings of my paper — the temporal clustering of infant deaths in the immediate post-vaccination window, the historical SIDS rate spike following the national immunization campaign, the full literature review — remain unrefuted.

“No one has engaged with the data. They simply made the paper disappear. That should concern every parent, every researcher, and anyone who believes science advances through open inquiry rather than institutional gatekeeping.”

According to the notice, the editor-in-chief decided to remove Miller’s analysis because it used VAERS data “to infer a correlation between vaccination and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).”

However, Miller said he never claimed a causal relationship between vaccination and SIDS. He said:

“My paper stated plainly: ‘While this paper does not prove an association between infant vaccines and sudden infant deaths, it reveals unusual patterns and safety signals highly suggestive of a causal relationship.’ I called for further investigation — nothing more.”

The journal launched an investigation into the article after PubPeer commenters criticized Miller’s paper starting in November 2021.

Some comments cited criticism posted on X by Magdalen R. Wind-Mozley, a former forensic scientist and vaccine advocate based in Newbury, England, who posts under the username “Rosewind,” Retraction Watch reported.

According to Retraction Watch, Wind-Mozley contacted the journal in 2022 to call for the article’s retraction.

The journal notified Miller about concerns raised by the commenters. According to the removal notice, “The Editor-in-Chief determined that the author’s response did not satisfactorily address the concerns raised about this article.”

However, Miller tells a different account of how things unfolded. He said:

“Neither Dr. Lash (Toxicology Reports) nor Dr. Papi (Elsevier) ever specified what the alleged methodological flaws were. From subsequent correspondence, I gathered their concern likely centered on reporting bias — an issue I had already explicitly addressed in the paper’s ‘Strengths and Limitations’ section.”

Since Miller had already acknowledged the critics’ concern — reporting bias — as a limitation of the study when it was first published, on what grounds did the journal remove it?

That’s a question that needs answering, Miller said. “I am deeply appreciative of Senator Ron Johnson and Secretary Kennedy for their efforts to get to the root of this problem.”

In his letter, Johnson cited a grieving mother who lost her child to SIDS. The mother said every parent at her SIDS support group brought up vaccines.

According to Johnson, the mother said, “We were all asking our SIDS support group leader, you know, is there a connection? Just seems like all of us feel like vaccines are involved.”

Johnson wrote:

“We owe it to this mother and all parents that have lost a child to SIDS to encourage and promote — instead of discourage and remove — medical research into the potential connection between vaccines and pediatric deaths.”

Miller’s paper cited possible biological explanations for why vaccination might cause SIDS in some babies, including inflammatory cytokines and some babies’ inability to process the toxicity of multiple vaccines given at once.

A 2025 study published in the International Journal of Medical Sciences found that underdeveloped liver enzyme pathways in some infants may make it harder for them to process toxic ingredients in vaccines, possibly leading to SIDS.

Study by Miller and CHD chief scientist also under attack

Miller noted that leading up to the paper’s removal, some influential figures had publicly endorsed his work on SIDS, including Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Pierre Kory.

“I suspect this amplified visibility, and the attendant fear of increased vaccine hesitancy, was instrumental in the decision to pull the article,” he said.

Brian Hooker, Ph.D., Children’s Health Defense (CHD) chief scientific officer, called Johnson’s letter “extremely encouraging and timely” given the lack of transparency surrounding the removal of Miller’s paper.

In April, Sage Journals notified Hooker that it is investigating a 2020 article he co-authored with Miller comparing health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated children following criticisms on PubPeer.

Sage stamped Hooker and Miller’s article with an “expression of concern” as it conducts its review.

Given these recent attacks on studies that raise questions about the safety of vaccines, Hooker said he was “heartened that both Sen. Johnson and Secretary Kennedy are investigating the very real threats of censorship of robust vaccine safety science.”

“Unlike their predecessors, these officials are interested in promoting scientific inquiry for the best health of our nation, rather than Big Pharma dogma focused on profits and institutions,” Hooker said.

Miller said he hopes that “credible research is evaluated on its merits, and that articles are not removed or retracted solely because their findings are controversial or challenge prevailing views.”

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/exclusive-sen-ron-johnson-demands-journal-turn-over-records-related-sids-vaccines-study/?utm_id=20260630

Iran deploys special forces to western borders after wave of terrorist attacks

 The military buildup comes amid a wave of attacks targeting security forces and civilians in Iran’s border provinces, linked to foreign-backed terrorist groups

Iran has deployed rapid reaction units and special forces to its western borders following a series of terrorist attacks on security personnel which martyred one police officer on Wednesday.

The deployment was announced by Army Ground Force Commander Brigadier General Ali Jahanshahi during a visit to units stationed in western border regions.

“With the presence and vigilance of Ground Force fighters and the capable ensemble of the Armed Forces, the borders of dear Iran enjoy the necessary security,” Jahanshahi said.

The military buildup comes amid a wave of attacks targeting security forces and civilians in Iran’s border provinces, linked to foreign-backed terrorist groups.

On Wednesday, police officer Mohammad Palangi was killed by gunmen in Sib and Suran County in southeastern Sistan and Baluchestan province, police said.

Palangi, a Sunni officer from the Baluch ethnic community, was on his way to work when he was shot, according to a police statement. Authorities said they were working to identify and arrest those responsible.

On Saturday, two law enforcement personnel were killed and five wounded in an attack on the Sabadlou checkpoint along the Baneh-Saqqez road in Kordestan province. Two civilians, including a three-year-old girl, were injured by ricocheting bullets, officials said.

Two members of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) were killed and two others wounded in a separate attack in the western city of Paveh in Kermanshah province on Monday, according to security sources.

Last week, gunmen killed two civilians in Saravan, also in Sistan and Baluchestan province, authorities said.

Iran’s judiciary chief has called for international legal action against the United States and Israel over support for terrorist groups operating inside Iran.

US and Israeli officials have publicly acknowledged providing arms and equipment to terrorist groups in Iran.

President Donald Trump said on April 6 that during the February US-Israeli strikes against Iran, weapons were sent through Kurdish intermediaries to terrorist groups operating along the Iran-Iraq border.

“We sent guns, a lot of guns, they were supposed to go to the people,” Trump told Fox News. “You know what happened? The people that they sent them to kept them,” he said, adding that he was “very upset” with the Kurdish intermediaries who he claimed kept the weapons for themselves.

Former Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennett disclosed on June 23 that Israel had smuggled tens of thousands of Starlink satellite internet receivers into Iran before the January riots, marked by violent armed attacks, arson and destruction by rioting elements.

Speaking at the JNS International Policy Summit in al-Quds, Bennett said the devices were intended to enable rioters “to coordinate with each other and ultimately bring down the Iranian government” with the ultimate goal of dividing the country into small statelets.

The Jerusalem Post and other Israeli media separately reported that Mossad had armed Kurdish militias with weapons seized from Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon as part of a broader plan to invade, with the CIA also involved in the effort.

The plan reportedly included providing the Kurds not only with a no-fly zone but continuous aerial firepower to help them advance against Iranian forces, though it was ultimately halted.

US and Israeli planners initially assumed Iran’s military would be neutralized within 24 hours—a scenario that did not materialize, the report said.

The report said Iran had prepared for multiple scenarios and forced the US to acknowledge military limitations.

Jahanshahi, the army commander, said the deployment of rapid reaction and special forces had eliminated any enemy “boldness” to attempt ground operations against Iran.

He said the presence of army units alongside IRGC and law enforcement forces ensured border security.

Jahanshahi said the armed forces remained in a state of constant readiness, citing the legacy of the martyred Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, who had emphasized the need for permanent preparation against threats.

He credited Iran’s survival in the recent war to divine grace, the guidance of new Leader Ayatollah Seyyed Mojtaba Khamenei, the sacrifice of the armed forces, public support and government backing.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/07/01/771401/Police-officer-martyred-in-terrorist-shooting-in-Iran%E2%80%99s-Sistan-and-Baluchestan-province

FARA Docs: Israel Spying on Millions of Christian Americans in Their Churches

Alan MacLeod

If you are a Christian living in the Western United States, you have almost certainly been targeted with pro-Israel, anti-Palestine propaganda, paid for directly by the government of Benjamin Netanyahu. Your searches, location, and internet activity is being monitored by Israel, and your algorithms and search results across multiple platforms are being manipulated by Israeli government in what its American partner calls the “largest geofencing and targeted Christian digital campaign ever.”

Amid a massive drop in support from the Christian community, Israel is spending millions of dollars to target individuals entering churches or Christian colleges with ads, and paying pastors across the country to promote propaganda and false “anti-Palestinian” narratives every Sunday, documents filed with the United States’ Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) show.

The 86-page disclosure reveals that Israel is recruiting Hollywood celebrities and sports stars to promote the country, while also manipulating Christians’ social media feeds. And they are doing it by spying on you through your phone.

MintPress explores this explosive story, largely ignored in corporate media.

Propaganda Storm

In September, Show Faith by Works LLC, a San Diego-based company led by conservative activist Chad Schnitger, filed a sworn document with the U.S. Department of Justice. The declaration revealed that the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs was paying Show Faith by Works $4.1 million to carry out a massive, covert, digital surveillance operation targeting Christian communities across multiple states, including California, Nevada, Arizona, Colorado, Texas, Utah, and Wyoming.

The document noted that all students at every Christian college and every congregant at “every major church” in California, Arizona, Nevada, and Colorado has been spied on through their phone’s location data, and targeted with propaganda extolling Israel’s “moral superiority” and “linking the Palestinian population with extremist factions.” The campaign estimates that it has reached well over eight million Americans.

Show Faith by Works itself divides its messaging into two themes: “pro-Israel” and “anti-Palestinian”. Its primary goals, in its own words, are to “combat low American Evangelical Christian approval of the Nation of Israel,” by “using biblical arguments to highlight the importance of Israel and the Jewish People to Christians.” It also wishes to “educate Christians on the historical importance of Israel and its significance in the region,” and to “counter new and evolving pro-Palestinian messaging as the global narrative shifts.”

Many of their anti-Palestinian talking points are highly controversial, dubious, or even blatant falsehoods. Their principal messaging on Palestine is that there never was (or should be) a Palestinian state in history, that “Palestinians shelter terrorists” and “hide weapons in their schools and hospitals,” and that they are not a trustworthy actor, as the Palestinians’ goals are “genocidal.”

They also share ads and messages with American Christians claiming that Gazans kill U.S. Christian aid workers distributing food to them, and that “Israel is the birthplace of Jesus.” (In fact, Jesus Christ was born in Bethlehem, in the Palestinian West Bank.)

The overall message, then, is one extolling Israel’s supposed virtues, encouraging Americans to visit, while dehumanizing Palestinians (including the 12.5% of historic Palestine who were Christians themselves) as genocidal terrorist intent on destroying the world.

Show Faith by Works projects that this content will receive 47 million impressions across the United States in its first twelve months in operation.

Hi-Tech Targeting

Show Faith by Works and the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs are able to carry out this sophisticated operation by taking advantage of a technology called “geofencing.” Geofencing creates invisible digital boundaries around real world locations (in this case, hundreds of churches and universities). Any phone or smart device entering a church on Sunday or a college during term time is logged and recorded. The operation then begins sending targeted advertisements and messaging to each device through ad networks, promoting Israel and demonizing Palestine. These messages appear in Google searches, on social media, and on any number of apps and platforms.

Your behavioral data – how you respond to the ads, what you click, or how long you watch for, is fed back into the operation in order to tailor messaging to each individual, making future targeting more effective. Over time, the system builds up an enormous amount of data on each individual – their locations, beliefs, preferences, and actions, in order to better manipulate them.

Once you enter a church or college targeted by Israel, there is almost nothing you can do about it. They are paying to manipulate your search results, news feeds, and algorithms. What you see online will be decided by Israel, not by you. And virtually none of the millions of people affected are aware this is happening.

Is Your Pastor a Secret Israeli Agent?

The operation admits that it has “digitally target[ing]” every large church in four western states. This includes 219 in California, 39 in Arizona, 32 in Colorado, and 14 in Nevada. Some of these megachurches boast congregations of up to 45,000 people, helping reach an estimated 3.9 million individuals. It has also geofenced hundreds of smaller churches across the country, reaching a further 3.8 million Christians, primarily in urban locations.

A wide range of Christian denominations has been targeted, including some traditionally associated with the conservative right-wing, such as the Southern Baptists and Pentecostals, generally associated. But the operation also focuses on others, such as the United Methodist Church, the African Methodist Episcopal Church, the Churches of Christ, and the American Baptist Churches USA.

A full list of confirmed churches and Christian colleges likely targeted can be found at the end of this investigation.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has described the battle for American public opinion to be the “eighth front” of the war, comparing it to the seven-front campaign he is already waging. In order to win this crucial struggle, Israel is employing Show Faith by Works to insert its messaging directly into the sacred sanctuaries of American churches.

The company was involved in the 1000 Pastors Project, an endeavor that saw some 1070 American clergymen accept an expense-paid trip to Israel in December in order to equip them with the ability to serve as unofficial ambassadors for the country. Thousands more pastors are expected to be invited on a similar trip this year.

Show Faith by Works has designed, published and distributed “pastoral resource packages” to hundreds of churches, packages that include “pro-Israel educational materials,” like the ones discussed previously, information “debunking pro-Palestinian popular arguments,” and helps to  organize group travel trips to Israel. They also recruit pastors to write newspaper op-eds, and produce 3-5 minute pro-Israel video lectures designed to be played in churches across the nation.

There is also a special effort to reach minority communities, with content specifically aimed at young women, Catholics, and Hispanic Christians being produced, while their pro-Israel material is also translated into Spanish, Vietnamese, and Russian.

American Colleges Get “the October 7 Experience”

Young American Christians are moving away from their traditional positions on the Middle East. A 2021 poll found that support for Israel among evangelicals aged 18-29 had dropped from 75% to just 34% over the past three years.

To that end, dozens of Christian colleges, with a total student body of well over 100,000 students have been geofenced. The Israel/Show Faith by Works project goal is to establish a major presence at Christian universities and seminaries, including making connections with professors, and hiring student representatives to spread the word and hand out specially designed merchandise.

The campaign includes creating an interactive travelling virtual reality exhibit called the “October 7 Experience” that will tour campuses, showing “atrocities from 10/7” and explaining the difficulties that the Israeli Defense Forces face while “fighting bad guys in hostile territory.”

Celebrity Agents of Israel

According to the documents, the October 7 Experience would be constructed by the company’s (unnamed) Hollywood coordinator, who would use their Tinsel Town connections to build a five-star exhibit. The coordinator’s job also included making connections with “top-tier Hollywood talent to book Christian celebrities and Christian athletes to deliver pro-Israel messaging.”

Among the names floated as possible hires include actors Jon Voight and Chris Pratt. From the world of sports, they aim to recruit former NFL quarterback Tim Tebow, three-time World Series winning pitcher Clayton Kershaw, and NBA star, Stephen Curry. Curry has expressed a deep interest in Israeli culture, has told the press that he is learning Hebrew, has two Hebrew tattoos on his wrists, and has invested heavily in Israeli defense corporations founded and staffed by IDF officers. For more on the NBA’s connections to Apartheid, see the MintPress investigation, “From Dunks to Drones: The NBA Has an Israel Problem.”

Another key category of influencers the project was looking to recruit was celebrity megachurch pastors. These included Mark Driscoll, Rick Warren, and Greg Laurie. Together, it was hoped that this stable of prominent Christians could use their power to influence the opinions of millions of followers nationwide, shoring up Israel’s sliding approval ratings in the United States.

Manipulating the Media

The Israeli government considers the online war as important as its military attacks against Palestine, Lebanon, Iran, and beyond. The documents show that Show Faith by Works planned to flood the internet with digital content – websites, social media posts, podcasts, and videos – in order to overwhelm both search engines and ordinary users with pro-Israel content.

Search engine optimization (SEO) – the practice of enhancing media’s visibility in search results – is a key part of this. As the document explains, the group will “optimize SEO traffic so that favorable coverage is increased and unfavorable information is decreased,” by “redirect[ing] nearly all web traffic to friendly sites based on key [search] terms,” “ensur[ing] that [our] website is the top of all search results,” and “prioritiz[ing] our information to key demographics.”

A less well-known tactic the group is using is generative engine optimization, or GEO, a new technique aimed at influencing how A.I. chatbots like ChatGPT and Claude “learn” in order to make them espouse pro-Israeli views. Show Faith by Works planned to deluge the internet with fake questions and answers written by them, in order that A.I. will parrot their talking points to users across the world.

Other media projects listed included starting Christian podcasts designed to sneak pro-Israel messaging to listeners, paying for pro-Israel ads and messages to be read out on other faith–based shows, and hiring a pastor to “keep up with Isreal [sic] news and to highlight pro-Israel, anti-Hamas news.”

They also plan to pay Christian influencers on social media to post about the virtues of Israel and “counter pro-Palestinian propaganda with response videos.” This strategy is similar to that of a similar Israeli campaign called the Esther Project, which paid influencers a reported $7,000 per post that supported Israel. None of the individuals receiving the money, however, has followed the law by filing as a foreign agent under FARA, leading to rampant speculation online about who has become rich accepting cash from Tel Aviv.

In short, then, the project’s goal is to create an enormous astroturfed wave of support for Israel in the Christian community by paying pastors, celebrities, and influencers to espouse their support and admiration for the country, its society, and its geopolitical goals.

Unbeknownst to the tens of millions of Christians seeing these messages in their ads, search engine results, chatbot answers, or in their churches and universities, none of this is natural. Rather, it is the result of a deliberate and designed strategy to manipulate their thoughts and opinions into supporting a state carrying out a genocide – including against Christians.

Israel’s War on Christians in West Asia

Palestine was once a land where large numbers of Christians and Muslims lived side by side in relative harmony. Today, that is not the case. During the Nakba – the 1948 establishment of Israel, Israeli ethnically cleansed 90,000 Palestinian Christians, and shut down dozens of churches.

Since 2023, the attacks on Christians have greatly increased. Every church in Gaza has been damaged or destroyed. This includes the historic Church of Saint Porphyrius, the third-oldest Christian place of worship in the world. The site has been targeted multiple times by Israeli forces, leading to the partial collapse of the religious building, which can trace its history back to 425 A.D.

Also targeted was the Al Ahli Church and Baptist Hospital, where repeated Israeli strikes pulverized the complex, killing hundreds.

Inside Israel, attacks on priests, pastors, and other clergy are a regular occurrence. Last month, footage of a 48-year-old French nun in East Jerusalem being pushed to the ground and kicked by a settler went viral, as did images of Israeli soldiers gleefully desecrating a church and taking a sledgehammer to a statue of Jesus in Southern Lebanon.

For decades, Christians have had to endure the common practice of Jews spitting on them. This sort of overt daily hostility towards Christians has proved to be a problem for pro-Israel conservative American church groups traveling to the region. Last year, conservative commentator and podcaster Brandon Tatum drew international ridicule, when, in an interview with Netanyahu, he thanked the Israeli prime minister and revealed that his Christian group was “only spit on once” during their trip to his country.

One of Show Faith by Works’ key talking points that it promotes, however, is that “Israel protects Christians like no other nation in the Middle East.”

American Christians Losing Faith in Israel

Support for Israel among Christians is crashing. This is reflective of a broader trend across the country; an April poll conducted by Pew Research found only 37% of Americans see Israel in a favorable light, as opposed to 60% unfavorably.

For decades, Israel has enjoyed widespread support from American Christians, particularly Evangelical Protestants, as many believe its existence is a prerequisite for the end of days, when Jesus Christ will return to Earth to establish his heavenly kingdom.

Nevertheless, its popularity, especially among younger Christians, is cratering, falling to just 34%. This age discrepancy is partially down to different patterns of media consumption. Elderly Americans continue to get their news from TV networks owned and controlled by billionaires such as Larry Ellison and Rupert Murdoch, both of whom are extremely close personal friends and passionate supporters of Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel’s expansionist policies. Younger Americans, by contrast, rely primarily on social media as their number one source of news.

Explaining this phenomenon, Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of pro-Israel pressure group, the Anti-Defamation League, stated that “we have a TikTok problem…a Gen-Z problem.”

To that end, Israel has poured vast amounts of resources into targeting Americans. The government’s yearly public relations budget has ballooned to $730 million – a roughly 100-fold increase on pre-October 7 levels. And it is Americans that are the prime targets of Israel’s focus. Indeed, the word “target” appears 44 times in the 86-page document, indicating that Show Faith by Works sees them as threats to be neutralized.

Christians report that being singled out like this in their sacred place of worship feels like a violation. Millions of American Christians are being secretly spied upon, and bombarded with propaganda. Christians in Palestine, Lebanon and the broader region, meanwhile, are surveiled, harassed, and bombarded with drones and missiles. In both cases, Israel is carrying out a coordinated, sophisticated and sustained attack on the Christian community. In Palestine, however, they are paying for it with their lives.

There now follows a list of all places of worship listed as targeted in the disclosure.

Abundant Life Cathedral Church Houston TX
Abundant Life Christian Center La Marque TX
Abundant Life Christian Fellowship Mountain View CA
Abundant Life Church of God San Antonio TX
Abundant Living Faith Center El Paso TX
Abundant Living Family Church Rancho Cucamonga CA
Acts Full Gospel Church of God In Christ Oakland CA
Adventure Christian Church Roseville CA
Agape International Center for Truth Culver City CA
Alamo City Christian Fellowship San Antonio TX
Alamo Heights United Methodist Church San Antonio TX
Alief Baptist Church Houston TX
All Nations Church Lakeview Terrace CA
Allen Temple Baptist Church Oakland CA
Antioch Community Church Waco TX
Antioch Fellowship Missionary Baptist Church Dallas TX
Antioch Missionary Baptist Church Beaumont TX
Apex Church Las Vegas NV
Arcade Baptist Church Sacramento CA
Ark Family Church Conroe TX
Atascadero Bible Church Atascadero CA
Austin Christian Fellowship Austin TX
Austin Ridge Bible Church Austin TX
Bandera Road Community Church San Antonio TX
Bannockburn Baptist Church Austin TX
Baptist Temple Church McAllen TX
Bay Area Christian Church Palo Alto CA
Bay Area Fellowship Corpus Christi TX
Bayside Church Roseville CA
Bayside of South Sacramento Sacramento CA
Bayview Baptist Church San Diego CA
Bear Creek Baptist Church Katy TX
Bel Air Presbyterian Church Los Angeles CA
Beltway Park Baptist Church Abilene TX
Bent Tree Bible Fellowship Carrollton TX
Berendo Street Baptist Church Los Angeles CA
Bethany Lutheran Church Austin TX
Bethany Slavic Missionary Church Sacramento CA
Bethel Church Irvine CA
Bethel Church Redding CA
Bethel Church of San Jose San Jose CA
Bethel’s Family Houston TX
Big Valley Grace Community Church Modesto CA
Bonita Valley Community Church Bonita CA
Braeswood Assembly of God Houston TX
Brentwood Baptist Church Houston TX
Bright Russian Baptist Church West Sacramento CA
Brookins Community AME Church Los Angeles CA
Calvary Austin Pflugerville TX
Calvary Baptist Church Beaumont TX
Calvary Bible Church Burbank CA
Calvary Bible Fellowship Temecula CA
Calvary Bible Fellowship Temecula CA
Calvary Chapel Santa Barbara CA
Calvary Chapel Downey CA
Calvary Chapel Chino Valley Chino CA
Calvary Chapel Golden Springs Diamond Bar CA
Calvary Chapel La Habra La Habra CA
Calvary Chapel Modesto Modesto CA
Calvary Chapel Montebello Montebello CA
Calvary Chapel of Costa Mesa Santa Ana CA
Calvary Chapel of Oceanside Oceanside CA
Calvary Chapel of Prescott Prescott AZ
Calvary Chapel of Vista Vista CA
Calvary Chapel Rancho Santa Margarita Rancho Santa Margarita CA
Calvary Chapel South Bay Gardena CA
Calvary Chapel Spring Valley Las Vegas NV
Calvary Chapel Westgrove Garden Grove CA
Calvary Christian Center Sacramento CA
Calvary Church Irving TX
Calvary Church of Santa Ana Santa Ana CA
Calvary Community Church Westlake Village CA
Calvary Houston Friendswood TX
Calvary Murrieta Murrieta CA
Calvary Phoenix Phoenix AZ
Calvary Temple Concord CA
Calvary Tucson Tucson AZ
Calvary Worship Center Colorado Springs CO
Campus Hill Church Loma Linda CA
Canyon Ridge Christian Church Las Vegas NV
Canyon View Vineyard Church Grand Junction CO
Capital Christian Center Sacramento CA
Capo Beach Calvary Capistrano Beach CA
Casas Church Tucson AZ
Cathedral of Faith San Jose CA
Cathedral of Hope Dallas TX
Celebration Church Georgetown TX
Central Baptist Church College Station TX
Central Christian Church Mesa AZ
Central Christian Church Henderson NV
Central Christian Church Lancaster CA
Champion Forest Baptist Church Houston TX
Chandler Christian Church Chandler AZ
Chapelwood United Methodist Church Houston TX
Chase Oaks Church Plano TX
Cherry Hills Community Church Highlands Ranch CO
Christ Chapel Bible Church Fort Worth TX
Christ Church Plano Plano TX
Christ Community Church Tucson AZ
Christ Community Church Greeley CO
Christ Fellowship McKinney TX
Christ United Methodist Church Plano TX
Christ’s Church of the Valley Peoria AZ
Christ’s Church of the Valley San Dimas CA
Christian Assembly Foursquare Church Eagle Rock CA
Christian Chapel Temple of Faith Dallas TX
Christian House of Prayer Copperas Cove TX
Christian Life Center Stockton CA
Christian Tabernacle Houston TX
Christian Worship Center Manteca CA
Church at Sugar Creek Sugar Land TX
Church For All Nations Colorado Springs CO
Church for the Nations Phoenix AZ
Church of the Harvest Los Angeles CA
Church Without Walls Houston TX
Cielo Vista Church El Paso TX
City of Grace Mesa AZ
City of Refuge Church Gardena CA
Clear Creek Community Church League City TX
Coast Hills Community Church Aliso Viejo CA
Colorado Community Church Aurora Aurora CO
Colorado Community Church Englewood Englewood CO
Columbus Avenue Baptist Church Waco TX
Community Bible Church San Antonio TX
Community Church of Joy Glendale AZ
Community of Faith Hockley TX
Compass Christian Church Colleyville TX
Compass Church Salinas CA
Concord Church Dallas TX
Concordia Lutheran Church San Antonio TX
Cornerstone Christian Fellowship Chandler AZ
Cornerstone Church San Antonio TX
Cornerstone Church Fresno CA
Cornerstone Community Church Wildomar CA
Cornerstone Community Church Simi Valley CA
Cornerstone Fellowship Livermore CA
Cottonwood Christian Center Los Alamitos CA
Cottonwood Creek Baptist Church Allen TX
Covenant Church Carrollton TX
Covina Assembly of God Covina CA
Crenshaw Christian Center Los Angeles CA
Cross Timbers Community Church Argyle TX
Cross Word Christian Church Riverside CA
CrossPoint Community Church Modesto CA
Crossroads Christian Church Grand Prairie TX
Crossroads Christian Church Corona CA
Crossroads Church Loveland CO
Crossroads Church Grass Valley CA
Crossroads Church of Denver Wheat Ridge CO
Crossroads Community Church Vallejo CA
Crossroads Grace Community Church Manteca CA
Denton Bible Church Denton TX
Desert Chapel Palm Springs CA
Desert Vineyard Christian Fellowship Lancaster CA
Destiny Church Indio CA
DFW New Beginnings Church Irving TX
Dream City Church Phoenix AZ
Eastern Hills Community Church Centennial CO
EastLake Church Chula Vista CA
Eastside Christian Church Anaheim CA
Elevate Life Church Frisco TX
Emmanuel Faith Community Church Escondido CA
Experience Life Lubbock TX
Faith Bible Chapel Arvada CO
Faith Community Church Tucson AZ
Faith Community Church West Covina CA
Faith Evangelical Free Church Fort Collins CO
Faith Family Church Victoria TX
Faith Fellowship Foursquare Church San Leandro CA
Faithbridge Church Spring TX
Faithful Central Bible Church Inglewood CA
Fallbrook Church Houston TX
Family Community Church San Jose CA
Fellowship Church Grapevine TX
Fellowship of the Parks Keller TX
Fielder Road Baptist Church Arlington TX
First African Methodist Episcopal Church Los Angeles CA
First Baptist Church Belton TX
First Baptist Church Midland TX
First Baptist Church Wichita Falls TX
First Baptist Church Aldington TX
First Baptist Church Dallas TX
First Baptist Church Pasadena TX
First Baptist Church Amarillo Amarillo TX
First Baptist Church Euless Euless TX
First Baptist Church McKinney McKinney TX
First Baptist Church of Elk Grove Elk Grove CA
First Baptist Church of Hamilton Park Richardson TX
First Baptist Church of Lubbock Lubbock TX
First Baptist Church of Richardson Richardson TX
First Chinese Baptist Church Los Angeles CA
First Christian Church Huntington Beach CA
First Church of the Nazarene Pasadena CA
First Covenant Church Sacramento CA
First Evangelical Free Church Austin TX
First Evangelical Free Church of Fullerton Fullerton CA
First Presbyterian Church Colorado Springs CO
First United Methodist Church Mansfield TX
First United Methodist Church Richardson Richardson TX
Flatirons Community Church Lafayette CO
Flood Church San Diego CA
Foothills Bible Church Littleton CO
Foothills Christian Fellowship El Cajon CA
Friendship West Baptist Church Dallas TX
Gateway Church Southlake TX
Gateway Community Church Austin TX
Glenview Baptist Church Fort Worth TX
Glide Memorial United Methodist Church San Francisco CA
Globe Harvest Church Dallas TX
Golden Hills Community Church Brentwood CA
Gospel Tabernacle Church Dallas TX
Grace Baptist Church Santa Clarita CA
Grace Bible Church College Station TX
Grace Brethren Church Long Beach CA
Grace Christian Center Killeen TX
Grace Church Reno NV
Grace Community Church Tempe AZ
Grace Community Church Reno NV
Grace Community Church Plano TX
Grace Community Church Tyler TX
Grace Community Church Houston TX
Grace Community Church Sun Valley CA
Grace Covenant Church Austin TX
Grace Fellowship United Methodist Church Katy TX
Grace Korean Church Fullerton CA
Grace Outreach Center Plano TX
Great Commission Baptist Church Fort Worth TX
Great Hills Baptist Church Austin TX
Greater Cornerstone Baptist Church Dallas TX
Greater Mount Zion Baptist Church Austin TX
Greater Saint Matthew Church Houston TX
Greater Saint Paul Baptist Church Oakland CA
Green Acres Baptist Church Tyler TX
Greenwood Community Church Greenwood Village CO
Harvest Christian Fellowship Riverside CA
Harvest Church Fort Worth TX
Harvest Church Elk Grove CA
Harvest Time Church Houston TX
Healing Word Tustin CA
Heart Revolution Church National City CA
High Desert Church Victorville CA
High Point Church Arlington TX
High Pointe Baptist Church Austin TX
Higher Dimension Church Houston TX
Highland Church of Christ Abilene TX
Highland Park Community Church Casper WY
Highland Park United Methodist Church Dallas TX
Highlands Church Scottsdale AZ
Hill Country Bible Church NW Austin TX
Hillside Christian Church- Amarillo West Amarillo TX
Hillside Community Church Alta Loma CA
Hope Fellowship Frisco TX
Hope Point Yuba City CA
Horizon Christian Fellowship San Diego CA
Horizon Christian Fellowship North County Rancho Santa Fe CA
Houston’s First Baptist Church Houston TX
Hyde Park Baptist Church Austin TX
Iglesia Cristiana La Familia de Dios Ontario CA
Iglesia Cristiana Misericordia Laredo TX
Iglesia Cristiana Rios De Agua Viva Pomona CA
Iglesia De Restauracion Inc. Los Angeles CA
Iglesia Ni Cristo Los Angeles CA
Iglesia Puerta Del Cielo El Paso TX
Immanuel Baptist Church Highland CA
Inland Hills Church Chino CA
Inspiring Body of Christ Church Dallas TX
International Christian Center Brownsville TX
International Church of Las Vegas Las Vegas NV
Irving Bible Church Irving TX
Journey Community Church La Mesa CA
Journey of Faith Manhattan Beach CA
Jubilee Christian Center San Jose CA
Jubilee Fellowship Church Lone Tree CO
Kingdom in the Valley Christian Church Litchfield Park AZ
Kingsland Baptist Church Katy TX
Knott Avenue Christian Church Anaheim CA
La Casa de Cristo Lutheran Church Scottsdale AZ
La Iglesia en el Camino Van Nuys CA
Lake Arlington Baptist Church Arlington TX
Lake Avenue Church Pasadena CA
Lake Hills Church Austin TX
Lake Pointe Church Rockwall TX
Lakeside Baptist Church Granbury TX
Lakeside Church Folsom CA
Lakewood Church Houston TX
Lancaster Baptist Church Lancaster CA
Life Church Irving CA
Life Church of God In Christ Riverside CA
Life Tabernacle Houston TX
LifeBridge Christian Church Longmont CO
LifePoint Church Minden NV
Lifeway Church Ministries Rancho Cucamonga CA
Lilly Grove Missionary Baptist Church Houston TX
Little Country Church Redding CA
Living Stones Church Reno NV
Living Streams Church Phoenix AZ
Loma Linda University Church Loma Linda CA
Longview Baptist Temple Longview TX
Love International Ministries Phoenix AZ
Loving Word Fellowship Houston TX
Maranatha Chapel San Diego CA
March of Faith Ministries Houston TX
Mariners Church Irvine CA
McKinney Memorial Bible Church Fort Worth TX
Menlo Park Presbyterian Church Menlo Park CA
Milestone Church Keller TX
Minister io s Bethania USA Carrollton TX
Ministerios Llamada Final Downey CA
Mission Community Church Gilbert AZ
Mission Ebenezer Family Church Carson CA
Mission Hills Church Littleton CO
Mobberly Baptist Church Longview TX
Morningstar Christian Chapel Whittier CA
Mount Calvary Baptist Church Fairfield CA
Mount Corinth Baptist Church Houston TX
Mount Olive Baptist Church Arlington TX
Mount Sinai Missionary Baptist Church Austin TX
Mountain Springs Church Colorado Springs CO
Mundo De Fe Carrollton TX
Name Location State
Neighborhood Church of Redding Redding CA
Neighborhood Church/Three Crosses Castro Valley CA
New Birth Baptist Church Dallas TX
New Birth Church Pittsburg CA
New Covenant Community Church Fresno CA
New Faith Church Houston TX
New Harvest Christian Fellowship Norwalk CA
New Hope Church Manvel TX
New Hope Missionary Baptist Church San Bernardino CA
New Life Center Bakersfield CA
New Life Church Colorado Springs CO
New Life Church Alamo CA
New Life Community Church Pismo Beach CA
New Light Christian Center Church Houston TX
New Song Church Carrollton TX
New Venture Christian Fellowship Oceanside CA
New Vision Church Milpitas CA
Newbreak San Diego CA
NewSong Church Irvine CA
North Church Carrollton TX
North Coast Calvary Chapel Carlsbad CA
North Coast Church Vista CA
North Phoenix Baptist Church Phoenix AZ
North Scottsdale Christian Scottsdale AZ
North Valley Baptist Church Santa Clara CA
Northern Hills Christian Church Brighton CO
Northside Christian Church Clovis CA
Northwest Church Fresno CA
Northwest Community Church Phoenix AZ
NorthWood Church Keller TX
Oak Cliff Bible Fellowship Church Dallas TX
Oak Hills Church San Antonio TX
Oakwood Baptist Church New Braunfels TX
Oasis Church Valley Village CA
One Community Church Plano TX
Orange Hills Assembly of God Orange Hills CA
Oriental Mission Church Los Angeles CA
Overcoming Faith Christian Center Arlington TX
Palm Valley Church Mission TX
Palm Valley Community Church Litchfield Park AZ
Palmcroft Baptist Church Phoenix AZ
Pantano Christian Church Tucson AZ
Pantego Bible Church Fort Worth TX
Paradise Alliance Church Paradise CA
Park Cities Baptist Church Dallas TX
Park Cities Presbyterian Church Dallas TX
Parkcrest Christian Church Long Beach CA
Peoples Church Fresno CA
Pilgrim Rest Baptist Church Phoenix AZ
Pilgrim Rest Missionary Baptist Church Dallas TX
Place for Life San Antonio TX
Pomona First Baptist Church Pomona CA
Potter’s House Church of Denver Denver CO
Prestoncrest Church of Christ Dallas TX
Prestonwood Baptist Church Plano TX
PromiseLand Church Austin TX
Radiant Church Surprise AZ
Rancho Community Church Temecula CA
Real Life Corpus Christi TX
Real Life Church Valencia CA
Reality Carpinteria CA
Red Rocks Church Golden CO
Redemption Church Tempe AZ
Resurrection Fellowship Loveland CO
Revival Center Modesto Modesto CA
Revival Christian Fellowship Menifee CA
River of Life Christian Church Santa Clara CA
River Pointe Church Richmond TX
Riverbend Church Austin TX
Riverlakes Community Church Bakersfield CA
Rock of Roseville Roseville CA
RockHarbor Church Costa Mesa CA
Rocky Mountain Calvary Chapel Colorado Springs CO
Rocky Mountain Christian Church Niwot CO
Rolling Hills Christian Church El Dorado Hills CA
Rolling Hills Covenant Church Rolling Hills Estates CA
Saddleback Church Lake Forest CA
Sagemont Church Houston TX
Saint Andrew’s Presbyterian Church Newport Beach CA
Saint John Baptist Church Grand Prairie TX
Saint John’s Downtown United Methodist Church Houston TX
Saint John’s Lutheran Church Orange CA
Saint Martin’s Episcopal Church Houston TX
Saint Michael and All Angels Episcopal Dallas TX
Saint Paul Baptist Church Sacramento CA
Saintsville Sanctuary Church of God In Christ Dallas TX
Sandals Church Riverside CA
Santa Cruz Bible Church Santa Cruz CA
Sarang Community Church Anaheim CA
Saturn Road Church of Christ Garland TX
Scottsdale Bible Church Scottsdale AZ
Seacoast Grace Church Cypress CA
Second Baptist Church Houston TX
Shadow Hills Church Las Vegas NV
Shadow Mountain Community Church El Cajon CA
Shepherd of the Hills Church Porter Ranch CA
Shoreline Christian Center Austin TX
Shoreline Community Church Monterey CA
Silverlake Church Pearland TX
Skyline Wesleyan Church La Mesa CA
Sonrise Community Baptist Church Santee CA
South Hills Church Corona CA
South Mountain Community Church Draper UT
Southeast Christian Church Parker CO
Southwest Community Church Houston TX
Southwest Community Church Indian Wells CA
Spring of Life Christian Church Mesa AZ
St Luke’s United Methodist Church Houston TX
Stonebriar Community Church Frisco TX
Stonegate Fellowship Midland TX
Sugar Creek Baptist Church Sugar Land TX
Summit Christian Center San Antonio TX
Summit Christian Church Sparks NV
Sun Valley Community Church Gilbert AZ
Sunnyvale First Baptist Church Sunnyvale TX
Sunrise Church Rialto CA
Tallowood Baptist Church Houston TX
Temple Bible Church Temple TX
Templo Calvario Assembly of God Santa Ana CA
Thanksgiving Church Buena Park CA
The Austin Stone Community Church Austin TX
The Bridge Fresno CA
The Bridge Bible Church Bakersfield CA
The Church at Bethel’s Family Houston TX
The Church at Rocky Peak Chatsworth CA
The Church at South Las Vegas Henderson NV
The Church on Rush Creek Aldington TX
The Church on the Way Van Nuys CA
The Community of Faith Houston TX
The Crossing Costa Mesa CA
The Crossing A Christian Church Las Vegas NV
The Dream Center / Angelus Temple Los Angeles CA
The Father’s House Vacaville CA
The Foundry United Methodist Church Houston TX
The Fountain of Praise Houston TX
The Grove Community Church Riverside CA
The Heights Baptist Church Richardson TX
The Heights Church Prescott AZ
The Hills Church of Christ North Richland Hills TX
The House Modesto Modesto CA
The Living Word Bible Church Mesa AZ
The Met (Metropolitan Baptist Church) Houston TX
The Oaks Fellowship Red Oak TX
The Packinghouse Church Redlands CA
The Potter’s House Dallas TX
The River of Life Church Phoenix AZ
The Rock Anaheim CA
The Rock Church San Diego CA
The Rock Church and World Outreach Center San Bernardino CA
The Rock Church of Sacramento Elk Grove CA
The Village Church Flower Mound TX
The Well Community Church Fresno CA
The Woodlands United Methodist Church The Woodlands TX
Timberline Church Fort Collins CO
Torrance First Presbyterian Church Torrance CA
Travis Avenue Baptist Church Fort Worth TX
Trinity Church Cedar Hill TX
Trinity Church Lubbock TX
Trinity Evangelical Free Church Redlands CA
Trinity Fellowship Church Amarillo TX
Twin Cities Community Church Grass Valley CA
Twin Lakes Baptist Church Aptos CA
University United Methodist Church San Antonio TX
Valley Baptist Church Bakersfield CA
Valley Christian Center Church Fresno CA
Valley Creek Church Flower Mound TX
VBF Church Bakersfield CA
Venture Christian Church Los Gatos CA
Victorville First Assembly Victorville CA
Victory Assembly Tucson AZ
Victory Missionary Baptist Church Las Vegas NV
Victory Outreach Church La Puente CA
Victory Outreach Church San Diego San Diego CA
Vineyard Christian Fellowship of North Phoenix Glendale AZ
Vineyard Church of the Rockies Fort Collins CO
Vino Nuevo de El Paso El Paso TX
Visalia First Assembly of God Visalia CA
Ward African Methodist Episcopal Church Los Angeles CA
Warehouse Ministry Sacramento CA
Washington Heights Baptist Church Ogden UT
Water of Life Community Church Fontana CA
Watermark Community Church Dallas TX
West Angeles Church of God in Christ Los Angeles CA
WestGate Church San Jose CA
Westover Hills Assembly of God San Antonio TX
Westside Baptist Church Lewisville TX
Wheeler Avenue Baptist Church Houston TX
White’s Chapel United Methodist Church Southlake TX
Whittier Area Community Church Whittier CA
Windsor Village United Methodist Church Houston TX
Woodlands Church The Woodlands TX
Woodmen Valley Chapel Colorado Springs CO
Word of Life Christian Center Lone Tree CO
Yorba Linda Friends Church Yorba Linda

Via https://www.mintpressnews.com/fara-docs-israel-is-spying-on-millions-of-christian-americans-in-their-churches/291001/

Here Comes the KIDS Act: USA joins the “age verification” club

Kit Knightly

Yesterday, the US House of Representatives quietly passed a bundle of “digital protections” collectively labelled the Kids Internet ​and Digital Safety Act (KIDS Act).

You might not have heard, because the US news was focused on other things, like the Supreme Court refusing to review the civil verdict that Donald Trump sexually assaulted E Jean Carroll, or that they would continue to count mail-in ballots that arrive after election day.

As is usually the case, the truly important news found itself buried behind things that never happened and things that don’t matter.

So what’s in the USA’s online safety act?

The same things that are in everyone else’s, obviously.

Digital ID this, age verification that.

The act is effectively a package of clauses and sections from other acts, including:

  1. Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA),
  2. Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA 2.0)
  3. Shielding Children’s Retinas from Egregious Exposure on the Net (SCREEN) Act
  4. Safeguarding Adolescents from Exploitative (SAFE) Bots Act
  5. Safer Guarding of Adolescents from Malicious Interactions on Network Games (GAMING) Act.

[Side note – I HATE US legislation naming conventions and the need to force cringey acronyms.]

If you want to go into the details, there’s a good write-up here.

The unfortunate truth is the details don’t really matter. As we’ve seen already with Spain, the UK, Australia, Canada et al. the actual measures and rules may have cosmetic differences, but in the end they share one important similarity: The only way to enforce them is age verification.

This is true of social media bans, or screen time limits, or algorithm exemptions or disabling infinite scrolling or nudity filters or…any of them.

Whatever is or isn’t in the KIDS Act, it will need you to verify your age by biometrics or digital ID to work.

Just like everywhere else.

It passed the House with bipartisan support. It will probably pass the Senate too; if it doesn’t, it will be branded as a “victory for small government”…and the individual states will just pass their own legislation. As many already have.

And just like that, Trump’s MAGA US will be just like the “liberal” countries he despises and who claim to despise him.

[…]

Via https://off-guardian.org/2026/06/30/here-comes-the-kids-act-usa-joins-the-age-verification-club/

Lebanon’s parliament speaker scrambles to form broad political front to reject Israel deal

(Photo credit: Fadel Itani/AFP)

The Cradle

JUN 30, 2026

Lebanese Parliament Speaker and head of Hezbollah ally the Amal Movement Nabih Berri is working to build a broad cross-sectarian “political front” to oppose the new Lebanon–Israel agreement signed in violation of the country’s laws, local media said on 30 June.

Lebanese outlet Elnashra says the “ruling establishment has moved to defend the agreement as a gateway to ending the war and opening the door to a new period of stability,” adding that “a political opposition front has gradually begun to emerge” under Berri’s leadership.

This front will aim to “transcend sectarian lines,” it adds.

Sources said Berri was among the first Lebanese officials to be “shocked” by the concessions Beirut accepted during the negotiations.

Rather than escalating tensions or mobilizing supporters on the streets, the speaker has reportedly instructed Amal Movement officials to avoid sectarian rhetoric and prevent opposition to the agreement from turning into civil strife.

According to the report, Berri believes opposition to the agreement extends well beyond Hezbollah and includes Sunni political and religious figures.

Parties and factions with differing views on direct negotiations with Israel have voiced concerns that Lebanon conceded far more than it received in the illegal direct talks.

“Political, religious, and public figures … believe that the deal involves major and unacceptable concessions, even if they disagree with Hezbollah on other issues,” the sources went on to say.

They added that “Arab states will play a role in Berri’s efforts.”

The parliament speaker is trying “to manage this phase by bringing together the various forces opposed to the agreement under a broad national political umbrella, avoiding emotional slogans in order to keep the opposition within constitutional and political channels and prevent it from escalating into an internal conflict.”

The report coincided with continued opposition to the Lebanon–Israel framework from Hezbollah political officials.

In comments to the New Arab, senior Hezbollah official Mahmoud Qamati described the accord as “born dead,” while warning that the resistance “will not allow it to be implemented” and will “confront it through every possible means.”

Hezbollah MP Hussein al-Hajj Hassan said on Tuesday that the agreement was a “surrender” that “will not pass.”

“No one will disarm the resistance,” Hajj Hassan’s statement added.

The Elnashra report comes a day after Berri hinted at his efforts to politically reject the framework, in an interview with Al-Akhbar newspaper.

“This agreement will not pass, and it will not be implemented,” Berri told the newspaper.

He stressed that his opposition to the agreement will remain “within constitutional frameworks,” and that his party – which is closely allied to Hezbollah – “will not boycott any cabinet session in which the agreement is discussed.”

“That is where we will confront it and state our position,” he added.

“The greatest danger posed by the agreement is not only its political content but also the possibility that it could fuel internal divisions and provoke Lebanese factions into confronting one another – something that would serve Israel above all else.”

The speaker called the deal “10 times worse than the 17 May Agreement of 1983,” referring to a Lebanese–Israeli peace deal decades ago which failed to materialize.

Berri, who at the time was at the start of his political career, played a key role in collapsing the 17 May 1983 agreement.

The speaker also said in the interview that Lebanon’s best option was accepting its inclusion in the US–Iran memorandum of understanding (MoU), calling it the “only framework capable of creating a balance of power that would force Israel to meet its obligations.”

The US–Lebanon–Israel deal signed in Washington on 26 June stipulates that Hezbollah must be disarmed before any withdrawal of occupation forces can take place.

It calls for the establishment of “pilot zones” in which the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) would deploy in order to dismantle “non-state armed groups,” including the resistance.

“Two initial zones have been agreed to by the [Israeli army] and the LAF, and future pilot zones will also be agreed upon by mutual consent,” Clause 3 of the framework stipulates, in effect forcing the Lebanese army to take permission from Israel on where it would deploy.

The deal would also bar Lebanon from filing legitimate international legal complaints against Israel, which has killed over 4,000 Lebanese and displaced over a million since the start of March this year.

Another clause legitimizes “support” from “Arab partners” in disarming the Lebanese resistance.

Hebrew and Lebanese media reports have discussed the existence of secret clauses which aim to solidify Israeli occupation and grant Tel Aviv the right to “approve” the LAF’s work.

[…]

Via https://thecradle.co/articles/lebanons-parliament-speaker-scrambles-to-form-broad-political-front-to-reject-israel-deal-report

US congress blocks attempt to strike down US–Israel military integration

(Photo credit: US Marine Corps Lance Cpl. Emma Gray)

The Cradle

JUN 30, 2026

Representatives Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna have also been pushing for a vote to cut the billions in yearly military aid to Israel

The US Congress blocked lawmakers Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie’s efforts to secure a vote to prevent plans to integrate Washington and Tel Aviv’s military industries on 29 June.

The refusal came via the US House of Representatives’ Rules process for the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).

This act determines which proposed amendments to the defense policy bill will be debated and voted on.

Democrat Khanna and Republican Massie had proposed an amendment that would have removed the integration initiative – called the US–Israel Defense Technology Initiative – from the defense policy bill.

The list of amendments was released on Monday and did not include the Khanna–Massie amendment.

The initiative in question would not only fuse the US and Israeli military-industrial complexes but also military technology and data, as well as AI and autonomous weapon systems.

Such technology is used by Israel in its ongoing genocide of Palestinians in the besieged Gaza Strip, with US backing.

US-made weapons have also killed thousands in Lebanon within just a few months.

The integration bill has sparked significant backlash, at a time when polling continues to indicate growing distrust toward Israel among the US public.

“The dangers of allowing any other nation to access our sensitive military technologies are obvious, including the fact that back doors and spyware can be installed that will most certainly be used by the Israelis to influence US policy,” said former director of the National Counterterrorism Center Joe Kent.

Kent resigned in March over the illegal US-Israeli war on Iran.

He also commented that he believed Tel Aviv pushed Washington into the war, and refuted the idea that Tehran was seeking to weaponize its nuclear program.

Others besides Kent have also repeatedly expressed concern over Israeli espionage against the US government.

This includes former CIA agent and whistleblower John Kirkiakou – who has recently frequented multiple podcasts and has made viral claims about the Mossad planting listening devices in US intelligence headquarters.

Congress has also struck down an attempt by Khanna and Massie to remove the $3.3 billion in yearly US military aid to Israel.

The push also began earlier this month and has caused a split among Democrats.

Some have defended the push, while others have lambasted it. “Soon, the House will vote on an amendment to block taxpayer funding to Israel’s military. I will vote yes,” US Democratic Representative Greg Casar said on 29 June.

“The Israeli government committed war crimes in Gaza and helped drag America into war with Iran. Americans should not be financing more weapons for Netanyahu,” he added.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) also said she would vote in favor of cutting the aid. Others have opposed it.

“There’s just too many factors to say … We’re taking away $3.3 billion,” said Representative Gregory Meeks, top Democrat of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

“I know there is still danger [in Israel]. I don’t want Israel to be without what they need,” he added.

Plans for the US–Israel military integration were revealed last month in a clause of the 2027 NDAA.

Section 224 of the NDAA proposes bilateral defense research and development, co-production of weapons, joint ventures, licensing agreements, and other US–Israel military-industrial complex cooperation.

It calls for expanded US–Israeli coordination and integration in the fields of military technology, AI, quantum tech, autonomous systems, directed energy, and biotechnology.

[…]

Via https://thecradle.co/articles/us-congress-blocks-attempt-to-strike-down-us-israel-military-integration

Woman accusing Trump of sexual assault in Epstein case fears for her life

Jeffrey Epstein (L) and Donald Trump pose together at the Mar-a-Lago estate, in Palm Beach, Florida, in 1997.

Press TV

A woman who has accused US President Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her after she was introduced to him by Jeffrey Epstein is living in fear of retaliation, according to a family member.

The woman, identified in court records as “Jane Doe 4,” has remained “off the grid” following renewed attention to FBI interview records related to the Epstein investigation, the relative told The Guardian, citing concerns for her safety.

Jane Doe 4 was interviewed by the FBI on four occasions in 2019. According to the interview records, she told agents that Epstein sexually abused her in the 1980s before introducing her to Trump, who she alleges also sexually assaulted her when she was between the ages of 13 and 15.

Trump has denied the allegations, while the White House has described them as “completely baseless” and unsupported by credible evidence.

The FBI did not bring charges against anyone in connection with Jane Doe 4’s allegations, and there is no indication the agency pursued the claims after concluding its interviews in August 2019, when Trump was serving his first term as president.

According to the FBI’s report of its final interview, the woman ended contact with her FBI case agent after telling investigators she believed she was being followed.

Jane Doe 4’s relatives declined to disclose her current whereabouts.

Her case has become a focal point in a legal dispute over the US Justice Department’s handling of records related to Epstein.

A federal judge has ordered the department to release unredacted files or explain why they cannot be disclosed, including FBI interview records concerning Jane Doe 4.

Advocates for Epstein’s victims say responsibility for investigating the allegations rests with the Justice Department, rather than with the victim herself.

Epstein died under suspicious circumstances in federal custody in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges.

His longtime associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, is serving a 20-year prison sentence after being convicted of recruiting and grooming underage girls for sexual abuse.

[…]

Strategic miscalculation: How US violations of MoU bolster Iran’s Hormuz leverage and regional deterrence

By Press TV Strategic Analysis Desk

Barely weeks after affixing its signature to a war-ending memorandum of understanding (MoU) with Tehran, Washington carried out another act of unprovoked military aggression on Iranian soil on Friday night, in flagrant violation of the provisions of the understanding.

The attack, which targeted Sirik Island in southern Hormozgan province, is the latest in a series of provocative military actions that drew swift and decisive Iranian retaliation.

The pretext for the latest aggression was to mount a challenge to Iran’s lawful enforcement of sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz, particularly as US naval forces continue their dangerous pattern of maritime banditry in regional waters.

At its core, this latest act of military aggression betrays a deeper strategic malaise: Washington’s inability to reconcile itself with Iran’s undisputed command of the world’s most vital chokepoint, compelling it to repudiate its own diplomatic commitments in a desperate bid to reverse an irreversible geopolitical shift.

Strait of Hormuz: Iran’s strategic trump card

For decades, the Strait of Hormuz was seen as a vulnerability for Iran. Despite its geographic advantages, Iran’s lack of full control over the strategic waterway allowed hostile foreign powers to establish military bases in the Persian Gulf, thereby threatening Iran’s security and territorial integrity.

The third imposed war, during which enemy bases in the Persian Gulf region served as launching pads for unprovoked aggression against the Iranian people, changed the dynamics entirely as Iranian armed forces moved to dictate new rules of engagement.

Iran’s effective control over the Strait of Hormuz became one of the war’s greatest achievements, a strategic asset that transformed Iran into a regional superpower.

The war-ending memorandum signed by the Iranian and American presidents codified this reality. Clause 5 explicitly requires Iran, through its own arrangements, to restore maritime traffic to pre-war levels within 30 days, while establishing a joint mechanism with Oman for the future administration of the strait, effectively ending American maritime banditry.

For Iran, the Strait is not merely a waterway but the best instrument for guaranteeing the other side’s fulfillment of its commitments. Without effective control over the Strait, Iran’s leverage in any future negotiations would be severely diminished.

It also serves as a guarantee of Iran’s long-term security. The Strait provides Iran with a sustainable means of ensuring its own security, obtaining compensation and reparations for recent war damages, and securing the country’s required resources.

Having been absent for years, Iran’s effective and legitimate control over the Strait is now the demand of an overwhelming majority of the Iranian people and the country’s Leader, making it a symbol of Iran’s sovereignty.

This is why Iran will not, under any circumstances, relinquish its exercise of sovereignty over the Strait, even at the cost of renewed military confrontation.

Last night’s attack: A dangerous violation of the MoU by Americans

The US attack on Iranian coastal areas on Friday night was not a defensive measure, as the American president would have the world believe. It was a deliberate provocation, designed to challenge Iran’s legal and effective control over the strategic waterway and to undermine the new order that emerged from the recent failed war.

The chain of events is clear:

Oman’s unilateral action: Under US pressure, Oman sought to open a route alongside its own coastline, allowing vessels to pass free of tolls in direct contravention of Clause 5 of the Iran-US memorandum, which requires a joint mechanism with Iran.

Iran’s lawful protest: Iran protested Oman’s unilateral action and took military measures to prevent the passage of vessels deemed to be in violation of the new arrangements.

The US response: Claiming that Iran’s action constituted a violation of the understanding, the United States launched illegal attacks on Iranian territory.

At every stage, the provocations have originated from the United States and its allies.

Washington is struggling to accept Iran’s exercise of sovereignty over the Strait and seeks to disrupt the new balance of power and new rules of engagement. The latest aggression was an attempt to reverse the outcome of the war by force.

Iran’s legal and strategic position is unassailable

Iran’s interpretation of Clause 5 of the MoU has now become evident in practice. Through its decisive military response to last night’s US military aggression, and earlier through the necessary detention of vessels deemed to be in violation, Iran has demonstrated that it understands Clause 5 only as requiring the Strait to be reopened under Iranian arrangements. Any other arrangement, such as Oman’s unilateral route, is illegal and will be treated as such by the Iranian armed forces, who remain at peak alertness.

The United States cannot claim that Iran violated the memorandum when it was Washington that first breached it, by exerting pressure on Oman to announce a unilateral action and then launching military aggression against Iran.

Under Clause 1 of the memorandum, both parties are prohibited from using threats or force against one another. Iran’s seizure of violating vessels constituted neither any threat nor any use of force against the US. The attack, therefore, has no legal or strategic justification.

The parallel track: Lebanon, Hezbollah, and the Resistance Front

Parallel to the Iran-US war-ending MoU, the United States pursued a separate track: negotiating directly with the Israeli regime and the deeply unpopular Lebanese government to disarm Hezbollah and legitimize Israel’s continued occupation of southern Lebanon.

This was a calculated attempt to undermine the massively popular Resistance Front while pretending to honor the Iran-US agreement. Under Clause 1 of the MoU, both parties are obligated to guarantee Lebanon’s territorial integrity and sovereignty.

But the United States has deliberately facilitated a distorted interpretation of this clause.

The US and Israeli interpretation that the occupation is temporary and therefore does not violate Lebanon’s territorial integrity is the main issue. Under this interpretation, the illegal occupation could continue indefinitely, with Israel withdrawing only after Hezbollah is disarmed and the security of settlers in northern occupied territories is guaranteed.

Another issue is the interpretation that guaranteeing Lebanon’s sovereignty means accepting whatever the Lebanese government decides. This would imply that since the Lebanese government has agreed to Israel’s continued occupation, Iran and Hezbollah should also submit to this decision.

Both deviations are false. The US war machine deliberately arranged the agreement between the Lebanese government and the Israeli regime to create these distortions.

The unified Resistance Front: A strategic necessity

The equation of the unified Resistance Front is one of Iran’s most valuable strategic assets. It ensures that aggression against one member of the Axis is met with resistance by all, making the costs of war unbearable for the enemy.

The United States and Israel understand this, which is why they are seeking to break the front through other means. Iran must firmly insist on Clause 1 and its obvious and natural interpretation. Clause 13 is clear: nuclear negotiations will commence only if the five clauses, especially Clause 1, are implemented or are in the process of implementation.

Iran must use this leverage to obtain from the US a timetable for Israel’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon and adjust the various stages of the negotiations accordingly.

The war against Lebanon cannot end simply because the Lebanese government has signed a bogus agreement with the Israeli regime. It must end only when Israel withdraws from the occupied territories and the Resistance Front’s integrity is guaranteed.

This is not merely a diplomatic demand but a strategic necessity. Any agreement that legitimizes occupation or disarms the Resistance is a defeat disguised as a settlement.

The way forward: Resolute, decisive and uncompromising

The events of the past twenty-four hours have once again clarified the high stakes. The US is seeking to undermine the new order in the Strait of Hormuz and to break the Resistance Front through parallel diplomatic tracks. Iran must respond with clarity and firmness.

Iran must continue, more seriously and more decisively than before, its strict supervision of traffic through the Strait of Hormuz and prevent any violations with full force. The Strait is Iran’s sovereign right and its best guarantee of future security and economic prosperity.

No US pressure, no threats, and no attacks will change that.

On Lebanon, Iran must insist on the full implementation of Clause 1 of the memorandum and reject any interpretation that legitimizes illegal occupation or disarmament. The unity of the Resistance Front is not negotiable at any cost.

Iran must demand a timetable for Israel’s military withdrawal from southern Lebanon during the 60-day negotiation period and make the progress of negotiations contingent on the fulfillment of that timetable.

Iran must also make it clear that it will not accept any deviation from the memorandum. Americans cannot violate Clause 1 while claiming to honor the MoU.

If Washington persists in its provocations, Iran must be prepared to escalate its response to demonstrate that its commitments are firm and its sovereignty is non-negotiable.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/06/27/771195/strategic-miscalculation-how-us-violations-mou-bolster-iran-hormuz-leverage-regional-deterrence