By Alexis Goldstein

This article was originally published by Truthout

As firms like CoreWeave and NVIDIA start to wobble, let’s demand that the public won’t be the one left holding the bag.

AI data centers are unpopular for good reason: they drive up utility costs for communities, crowd out everything from schools to family farms, and they’re bad for our health. But these data centers are also a financial crisis in slow motion.

The AI ecosystem is built on mountains of debt taken on not only by tech firms like Meta (which borrowed a record-breaking $25 billion in late 2025 to fund the building of data centers), but also by the companies that lease data center space to the Big Tech firms. Many of these firms have spent far more than they have come close to earning in profits: One estimate puts tech industry spending to build data centers at $1.9 trillion, but less than half of that money has been made in revenue.

The financial markets are taking notice.

There’s been significant turmoil in the tech sector over the past month — and at one critical company in particular: CoreWeave.

CoreWeave used to be a Bitcoin mining firm called Atlantic Crypto, but it started to pivot to AI in 2019. CoreWeave leases space to Big Tech firms at data centers they build and maintain. CoreWeave has paid for most of its data centers by borrowing: it currently owes more than $51 billion to investors, including two of the most infamous financial firms: Magnetar and Blackstone, as documented by journalist Elizabeth Lopatto at The Verge.

CoreWeave’s troubles have been piling up: its stock lost a quarter of its value — a 25 percent drop — last week, then dropped another 10 percent on October 22. Bond investors are demanding more money if they’re going to take on the risk of buying CoreWeave debt, a sign the markets are worried about CoreWeave going bust. Investors used to be content to be paid 9.75 percent a year to loan CoreWeave money until 2031; now bond market investors won’t take that risk without being paid almost 15 percent in annual interest.

But perhaps the worst bit of news for CoreWeave is in the market’s falling confidence in its ability to survive, as measured by the cost of an instrument known as the credit default swap, which is essentially a bet that a company is going to go bankrupt (it’s also described as insurance against that company’s bankruptcy). The cost of buying a five-year-long credit default swap for CoreWeave has increased over 164 percent in the past year.

It’s not just CoreWeave facing trouble. One of the most significant companies in the AI ecosystem is NVIDIA, the graphics card maker, which, on September 28, spent $150 billion to buy back shares of its own stock from the overall market.

It was a record-breaking stock buyback — no other company in history had ever purchased that much of its own stock. One reason companies buy back their own stock is to artificially boost the stock price. Often the CEO’s compensation is tied to the price of the stock, and so the company purchases its own stock back to drive up the price, thus guaranteeing the CEO higher compensation.

The market sometimes perceives a stock buyback as a sign of confidence, reinforcing the idea that the company itself is underpriced. But in the case of NVIDIA, it seemed to be an indication that there’s nowhere higher to go, and the only way to raise the price of NVIDIA stock, which has been on a record tear, is to artificially boost it. Financial journalists have questioned NVIDIA’s ability to keep rocketing upward since late 2025. NVIDIA stock is down around 5 percent since this latest buyback.

AI has been sold to the general public as everything from a panacea to a danger to humanity to a roaring bull market, but it’s starting to look more like financial mania.

In late 2025, OpenAI CFO Sarah Friar caused a stir when she suggested the government should backstop AI firms like hers. Astra Taylor and Naomi Klein warned about the potential for an AI bailout in their new book End Times Fascism: And the Fight for the Living World, and propose a new disarmament movement.

To disarm the big tech bomb, including AI, the public needs to be on high alert — as AI firms start to visibly wobble, we need clear demands and firm commitments from our leaders that if it all comes crashing down, the public won’t be the one left holding the bag.

Via https://scheerpost.com/2026/10/28/as-the-ai-bubble-threatens-to-burst-we-must-prepare-to-fight-a-big-tech-bailout/

Image by Akela999 from Pixabay

Pam Vernon

October 31, 2026

Erin launched Brockovich Data Center Reporting—which received nearly 4,000 submissions in its first month alone. She sits down with Jon to discuss everything she’s learned, what the industry gets wrong about the backlash, and whether there’s a way to build what we need without screwing over the people who have to live with it.

SOURCE

Via https://envirowatchnz.com/2026/10/31/erin-brockovich-4000-people-asked-me-to-investigate-data-centers-heres-what-i-found/

Photo Credit – © Canva Pro Content License

By Miss Information
30 October 2026

It is a source of relief to those of us working with the vaccine injured, and advocating for the preservation of medical ethics against the corporate takeover of health systems, to see well-organised pushbacks elsewhere. Canada, home of the Freedom Truckers who inspired our own Freedom Convoy and parliament occupation in 2022, has acknowledged the suffering of the covid vaccine injured and bereaved in an official parliamentary hearing, The Allison Inquiry.

Dean Allison is the federal Member of Parliament representing the Niagara West electorate of Ontario in the Canadian House of Commons. Based in Grimsby, on the south-western shore of Lake Ontario, Allison has a background in private business and community service. Elected to the House of Commons in June 2004, he has retained his seat for the past 22 years.

Over half of the entire population of Canada is reported to have received at least one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine. Health Canada’s Covid-19 safety reports document over 59,000 adverse events including 11,000 classified as serious.

It would seem Canada’s under-reporting is much worse even than ours. Doctors and patients have reported extreme difficulty in filing reports, and a consistent pattern by authorities allegedly tasked to investigate reports, of refusing to examine the possibility of safety signals. Combined with a general lack of public awareness to the connection between health problems and the injectable products, this means that the real numbers are likely to be higher by an order of magnitude.

Until last month the only inquiry into the experiences of Canadian citizens relating to the covid response had been the National Citizens Inquiry, launched in 2023 and driven entirely by citizen funding and leadership. Overseen by legal counsel Shawn Buckley, the NCI is now expanding into other related issues.

Allison describes hearing frequently from constituents about the impact of the covid response upon their lives. Sick, injured and disabled people report serious gaslighting from health professionals tasked with diagnosing and treating them, and broad censorship of any attempts to speak about their experiences. These stories impelled him to launch the non-partisan Allison Inquiry in collaboration with Shawn Buckley to “create a neutral forum for Canadians to share their personal experiences of injuries to themselves, or to others, from the Covid-19 vaccine(s).“

The inquiry was held from 8 September until 11 September 2026 at the Wellington Building on Parliament Hill in Ottawa. Over 1,400 witness applications were received from vaccine injured Canadians, with more continuing to come forward. Their experiences will be documented in the final report, and each applicant’s name was read out during breaks in proceedings, in order to be included in the official record.

Forty five injured or bereaved citizens were selected to appear in person at the live event, to describe their experiences and the impact their injury and/or loss has had on their lives. Eighteen expert witnesses with backgrounds in medicine, law, journalism, science and data analysis also provided evidence. Video of each full day, and separate footage of each individual testimony, with a short written summary of each, can be found at this link.

In his opening statement on 8 September 2026, Shawn Buckley revealed the fears expressed by many witnesses, some of whom withdrew testimony due to the stigma they face in a fractured society. “One person was told by a family member, “If I testify, I will never see my grandchildren again.” Another injured witness, who had already lost her mother and a sibling, feared losing the last family member she had left if she testified“. Others were unable to attend due to medical treatment commitments.

Open invitations were sent to all Members of Parliament and Senators, and all media outlets. On Day 2 it was reported that of the 20 seats reserved for the approximately 340 sitting MPs, only two were used. Allison reported that when the Inquiry was first planned, he could not herald any support from his parliamentary peers, but that ultimately about ten MPs attended some of the sessions. Unfortunately all represented the Conservative party, showing the political divide that remains on what should be, and is, a non-partisan issue.

Nevertheless, Allison has described this as a move in the right direction. He says that now MPs are contacting him asking for support to convene local town halls to hear from their constituents. As public perception of what has happened evolves, the conviction of political representatives on all sides of politics is destined to follow. New Zealand seems to be seeing some evolution in the actions of some smaller parties outside parliament and at least one Member of Parliament, current Foreign Minister, Winston Peters.

Similarly, whilst multiple independent media outlets (eg Press for Truth, Rebel News, The Highwire and Wiretap Media) attended and / or reported on the inquiry, legacy media remained absent. Headquarters of Canada’s national broadcaster, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) are a few steps away from the Wellington Building, yet not a single CBC journalist attended.

The absence of the CBC appears to have been eloquently explained by former CBC journalist Rodney Palmer in his presentation to the Allison Inquiry on the difference between “public broadcasters” and “state broadcasters”. New Zealand experienced a similar journalistic fate thanks to the $55m Public Journalism Fund which helped to uphold our “single source of truth“.

The focus of the Allison Inquiry was to give a voice to the vaccine injured, who have been marginalised, ignored, gaslit and smeared as “anti vaxxers” despite taking the products. This is a global phenomenon resulting from a calculated propaganda and censorship campaign.

The Canadian experience reflects that which is taking place globally including here in New Zealand. Whilst the NZ establishment claims to have addressed our covid response through the Royal Commission of Inquiry, human rights breaches and the associated physical harms continue to be ignored and downplayed.

Our health system plays a pivotal role in the ongoing administration of harmful interventions, and denial of the subsequent outcomes. Quoting US nurse whistleblower Erin Oszlewski who, like New Zealand database whistleblower Barry Young, was severely censored and attacked, Canadian mind control expert Jason Christoff explains here, the historical context of the role that doctors and nurses have played throughout history, in government programs of harm.

Why do you think, in every single medical euthanasia historical event, who do you think is at the centre of it? It’s the medical system. Each and every time.

This highlights the need for history to be taught in all health disciplines, so that practitioners develop an understanding of the potential harm they are capable of when following rules, protocols and guidelines without appropriate attention to the totality of evidence and ethical frameworks.

One of the most-cited scientists in history, world-leading epidemiologist Professor John Ioannidis from Stanford University is speaking out about the crisis of biomedicine. He rightly states that medical research is being destroyed by vested interests, basic research mistakes and a “deluge of fraudulent research“.

Professor Ioannidis suggests that the solution is to replace corporate-sponsored research funding with public funding. An early example of this is already happening via the Florida Cancer Innovation Fund. Announced by Governor De Santis in September 2025, public money to the tune of $60 million has been dedicated to researching the use of nutrition and repurposed generic drugs in cancer treatment. This is due in no small part to the work of Doctors Paul Marik and William Makis, as described in our April 2026 article A Burgeoning Medical Revolution: The Parasite-Cancer Link.

Via https://nzdsos.com/2026/10/30/vaccine-injured-allison-inquiry/

The first plane-load of 100 Salvadoran “special forces” soldiers that Bukele illegally deployed to Haiti arrived on Oct. 22, the day after he announced his “rescue operation.”

October 29, 2026 Kim Ives

On Feb. 29, 2024, the Viv Ansanm (Live Together), an alliance of greater Port-au-Prince’s neighborhood armed groups, blocked the capital’s international airport thereby thwarting the return to Haiti of reviled de facto Prime Minister Ariel Henry.

He was returning from Kenya where he had just signed an agreement to allow the deployment of the Multinational Security Support mission (MSS), a proxy “Coalition of the Willing”-like force that then Secretary of State Antony Blinken cooked up to fight the Viv Ansanm, which a Pentagon spokesman called a “proto-insurgency” this past summer.

The Haitian people almost universally welcomed Henry’s ouster.

But nine days later, Malaysian far-right Elon-Musk-finger-puppet Ian Miles Cheong tweeted out: “Haiti has collapsed. The President [sic] is no longer in the country. The ports are officially closed. Cannibal gangs are besieging the national palace in Port-au-Prince,” to which Musk immediately replied “End of days. This is bleaker than Mad Max.”

But a savior quickly stepped forward. The next day, El Salvador’s hard-right president Nayib Bukele, tweeted back to Cheong: “We can fix it. But we’ll need a UNSC [UN Security Council] resolution, the consent of the host country, and all the mission expenses to be covered.”

Steamrolling international law

Now, two and a half years later, Bukele’s Rambo moment has finally come. At this writing on Oct. 27, some 450 Salvadoran soldiers have already landed in Haiti in the past five days, with another 700 reportedly to arrive soon. The first deployment was 100 “special forces” troops deployed on Oct. 22, the day after Bukele announced his “rescue operation.” (As we go to press, the Salvadoran outlet Tendencias reports that there are now 1,000 Salvadoran soldiers in Haiti.)

But these soon-to-be 1,100-odd Salvadoran troops are not deployed as part of the Gang Suppression Force (GSF), launched in September 2025, which is current Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s enlarged and overhauled version of Blinken’s MSS. The Salvadorans sent this past week are commanded unilaterally by Bukele, an egregious departure from his Mar. 10, 2024 tweet (need “a UNSC resolution”) and a flagrant violation of the UN Charter.

What prompted the unlawful Salvadoran deployment was the Oct. 18 killing of five GSF mercenaries, four of whom were Salvadoran aircraft mechanics that were part of a contingent of some 80 Salvadorans attached to both the MSS and GSF.

Although Haïti Liberté reported last week that the mercenaries had burned to death in their armored car, the United States and El Salvador continued to insist, without any evidence, that they were alive. So the troops that Bukele is sending are a supposed “rescue mission.”

But this ruse appeared to be foiled on Oct. 24 when the Chen Mechan (Mean Dog) armed group, a Viv Ansanm affiliate, returned the bodies of the mercenaries, whom they said were killed in the armored car ambush and burning.

However, Bukele rejects that the bodies are those of his GSF-attached soldiers, even though the GSF command itself contradicts him, saying that it does not know.

Fils-Aimé missing in action

Meanwhile, the second of Bukele’s 2024 “fix it” conditions was also not met. There was absolutely no “consent from the host country.” First, this consent is impossible to obtain because Haiti only has a United States-protected, increasingly unpopular, de facto Prime Minister, Alix Didier Fils-Aimé, who rules by decree. But the second reason was that Fils-Aimé was not even present in Haiti when Bukele started to land his troops there. Fils-Aimé had left the country on Oct. 22 on a private jet to attend a wedding in Mexico, not returning until Oct. 27.

[…]

“Viewed strictly as invaders”

Whatever Rubio did or didn’t promise, Bukele’s troops have landed on a battlefield that his “Bukele model” was never built for. Salvadoran soldiers rounding up tattooed youths in San Salvador’s barrios is one thing. Fighting the Viv Ansanm in the warrens of Croix-des-Missions and the open plain of Croix-des-Bouquets is something else.

[…]

The foreign offensive, he argues, is propping up “an unrepresentative proxy government that contains zero elected officials and governs strictly by executive decree” – the government of the jet-setting Fils-Aimé. In doing so, it “forces a nationalist consolidation.” Rivalries among armed groups are “instantly erased by the presence of a foreign boot,” and the armed groups can now present their fight “as an indigenous defense of national sovereignty,” with the community becoming their “intelligence and logistical shield.”

[…]

Enter the Dominicans

That patriotic reaction is likely to grow sharper still with the appearance of Dominican soldiers alongside the Salvadorans.

At about 3:30 p.m. on Oct. 26, a correspondent for Live Tanbou Verite was at the Carrefour Marin in Croix-des-Missions, in the Chen Mechan neighborhood, just as a large firefight between the Salvadoran forces and Viv Ansanm fighters was getting underway. The correspondent saw a soldier in a Dominican military uniform step out of an armored vehicle. As the shooting became intense, the soldier climbed back into the tank.

This sighting flatly contradicts Dominican President Luis Abinader, who said on Oct. 26 that “the participation of Dominican personnel was never contemplated” in the international mission’s operations in Haiti.

[…]

“No one is permitted to leave”

The scale and ferocity of the offensive are documented in a GSF Situation Report dated Oct. 26 and obtained by Haïti Liberté.

[…]

The report adds that the fighting has caused “the collapse of hospital operations” in the area. “To prevent a mass escape of armed criminals and an incursion into its territory – driven by the ferocity of the offensive – Dominican President Luis Abinader has ordered a total and absolute closure of the borders,” the SITREP (in military parlance) says. “The military has been deployed on high alert, and armed clashes have also been reported along the border.”

[…]

The cost of this operation is being paid, as always, by the people who live in these neighborhoods. Dozens of local residents have been killed in the fighting that the Salvadoran, GSF, and PNH assault has unleashed in and around Croix-des-Missions and Croix-des-Bouquets.

[…]

The invaders are also taking losses: according to a highly placed source in the Viv Ansanm, 11 Chadian GSF soldiers were killed in battles after Oct. 18, but their deaths have not been announced by the force.

Meanwhile, the drone war being waged on the capital’s popular neighborhoods continues. Five drones were exploded in Belair on Oct. 25, and four soldiers of the Village de Dieu armed group, headed by Johnson “Izo” André, were killed.

Three armies against one

The result is a war without precedent in Haiti’s modern history. The Viv Ansanm is now fighting three different armies at once: a private one, Erik Prince’s Vectus Global, whose mercenaries operate the drones and armored car death-squads that have killed hundreds in the capital’s poor neighborhoods; a multinational one, the GSF, authorized by the UN Security Council but designed in Washington; and now a binational one, the Salvadoran expeditionary force, with Dominican support, at the very least.

None of these three forces answers to the Haitian people. Not one has been authorized by an elected Haitian official, because there are none left.

The “Shield of the Americas”

The Salvadoran-Dominican partnership in Haiti is not happening in a vacuum. On Oct. 26 and 27, Abinader hosted in Santo Domingo a conference of the Americas Counter Cartel Coalition (A3C), co-organized by the Dominican Defense Ministry and the United States Southern Command (SOUTHCOM), whose commander, Marine Gen. Francis L. Donovan, opened the gathering alongside Abinader and United States Ambassador Leah Francis Campos. Defense and security officials from 19 hemispheric nations attended to finalize “a strategic operational plan” and a “governance charter” for “combined operations” against “criminal networks,” according to the United States Embassy. SOUTHCOM itself trumpeted the meeting on X.

The A3C was announced in March by Pete Hegseth, Trump’s “Secretary of War,” and the United States Embassy describes it as “independent, but complementary” to the “Shield of the Americas,” the United States-led military and political coalition that Trump launched on Mar. 7 in Doral, near Miami. Headquartered at SOUTHCOM, the Shield promises member states “increased access to U.S. military equipment, training, and intelligence.” Among its founding members: El Salvador and the Dominican Republic. Bukele personally attended its launch.

So Bukele’s “rescue mission” and Abinader’s logistical and intelligence support are not improvised acts of neighborly solidarity. They are the first live-fire test of the Shield of the Americas, the vehicle through which Washington aims to militarize the Caribbean and Latin America under the banner of fighting “cartels” and “narco-terrorists.” That banner has already been used to justify lethal United States strikes on boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific (there was another strike on Oct. 27) and the military campaign against Venezuela.

[…]

Rubio’s Haitian interests?

Which brings us back to Marco Rubio, the architect of both the GSF and the hemispheric crusade against “narco-terrorism.” Does he have more than a policy interest in Haiti?

According to a very reliable Haïti Liberté source in Haiti, Rubio’s longtime friend and former roommate, ex-Congressman David Rivera, told him that Rubio had 140 businesses in Haiti. Rivera said this in August 2019, during a lengthy meeting with our source in Haiti. Rivera was in the country, the source said, seeking to bribe then-President Jovenel Moïse into opening the Haitian market to a range of Dominican products. It was while pitching this scheme that Rivera spoke about Rubio’s business interests in Haiti.

Haïti Liberté has not been able to independently verify Rivera’s claim. But if Rubio, or people close to him, have significant commercial stakes in Haiti, that would give him a powerful incentive to back a military offensive to “clear” the country of the armed groups that the Haitian bourgeoisie and its foreign masters see as a threat to their hegemony, business interests, and power.

Rivera and Rubio go back a long way. Before Rivera served in Congress from 2011 to 2013, the two Florida Republicans shared a home in Tallahassee as they rose together through the state legislature, and they remained close allies afterwards.

On Oct. 2, a federal judge in Miami sentenced Rivera to 10 years in federal prison for concealing a $50 million lobbying campaign on behalf of Venezuela’s government during Trump’s first term. Tapped by Maduro’s Foreign Minister Delcy Rodríguez, now Venezuela’s acting president, to get Washington to normalize relations, Rivera and a co-defendant, Esther Nuhfer, obtained a three-month, $50 million contract from an affiliate of the state oil company PDVSA. The two then “sought to manipulate influential friends, including Rubio,” the Associated Press reported (Rubio testified that Rivera never mentioned the contract). In the conspirators’ encrypted chat group, Maduro was the “bus driver” and Rubio was “Miss Clairol,” a play on rubio, Spanish for “blond.”

Prosecutors said Rivera hid the deal behind backdated documents and sham agreements, including one covering a $3.75 million payment to maintain his Venezuelan go-between’s luxury yacht. “He used his position of trust – and betrayed it consistently and repeatedly,” said Assistant United States Attorney Roger Cruz.

It was not Rivera’s first brush with scandal. He was accused of secretly funding a Democratic spoiler candidate in a 2012 congressional race (the case was eventually dropped) and was investigated, though never charged, over a $1 million contract with a gambling company while a Florida legislator. In other words, the man our source describes as trying to buy access to Haiti’s National Palace in 2019 had a long track record of exactly that kind of dealing.

Rivera, a stalwart of Miami’s Cuban-American anti-communist establishment, did not work for Caracas out of any sympathy for the government of Nicolás Maduro. He kept the lobbying secret, prosecutors argued, precisely because it “would ruin Rivera’s reputation as an anti-communist stalwart.” Judge Melissa Damian denounced him for betraying his life’s mission. “There’s no dispute this money came from the Maduro regime,” she said. Or, as United States Attorney Jason Reding Quiñones put it after the sentencing, “He sold his anti-communism to communists to fill his greed.” His lawyers have now applied for a presidential pardon from Trump.

[…]

Via https://www.struggle-la-lucha.org/2026/10/29/bukele-launches-illegal-war-in-haiti-with-dominican-support/

Cassandra MacDonald
Oct. 29, 2026

A group calling itself the “Department of Peace” has released a massive trove of records on more than 41,000 Department of Homeland Security employees and contractors, including names, cellphone numbers, email addresses, office locations, membership in internal groups tied to undercover operations, wiretap programs, and surveillance tools.

The transparency nonprofit Distributed Denial of Secrets published the archive under the name “Icepick” on Wednesday after receiving the material from the “Department of Peace,” which claims it obtained the data from DHS’s Okta single sign-on login system.

The records were last updated on August 19, 2026, and cover DHS headquarters along with agencies including Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.

WIRED, which reviewed the data dump, reported that the leak maps out organizational structure, reporting lines, facility locations, and permission groups for sensitive programs.

The report noted, “The Trump administration has prosecuted protesters for posting information about individual ICE officers and warned others for doing so. In June, 15 Minnesota residents were charged under laws related to stalking and threats of violence, which prosecutors linked to their participation in ICE-opposition activities. More than 100 HSI agents, including undercover operatives, took part in an operation that included widespread surveillance and infiltration of group chats.”

The BBC reports:

Most of the agents included, more than 21,000 of them, work for CBP, according to the data. Nearly 6,600 work for ICE.

Other records show agents with Homeland Security Investigations, the Federal Protective Service and even people working for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.

The leaked information also included dozens of previously unknown operation names, the agents that led and worked on those operations, and some of the technology they used in their work, including tech provided by Cellbrite and Palantir.

The hackers left a note with the files stating, “They have our information, so it’s only fair that we have theirs.”

The Department of Peace explicitly framed the release as retaliation.

A spokesperson for the group said, “On July 17th, Markwayne Mullin said he was ‘turning up the heat’. This is what happens to ICE when you do that.”

DHS confirmed to the BBC it is “aware of a potential breach and is actively working to address the situation swiftly and effectively,” adding that it takes threats against employees and officers seriously and will update the public when more information is available.

Okta told Wired that it is aware of the claims but that “Okta is secure, and we have no evidence our data or systems were compromised.”

The leak follows an attempted hack that took the Federal Election Commission system offline.

There has been a serious surge in threats and violence against federal agents, which the people publishing this information are obviously aware of.

DHS has repeatedly stated that ICE officers have faced an 8,000 percent increase in death threats and a more than 1,000 percent increase in assaults while carrying out enforcement operations.

Official releases have detailed specific incidents including an illegal immigrant in Dallas posting a TikTok offer of $10,000 for the murder of ICE agents, voicemails threatening agents’ spouses and children with deportation or violence, and cases of agents’ family members being stalked or having bounties placed on them.

In one instance, Homeland Security Investigations arrested a Florida man who repeatedly posted online calls to “shoot the ICE Nazis down” and “get a gun and shoot the ICE agents down.”

DHS has also reported agents’ spouses receiving messages comparing officers to Nazis and warning that “retribution will come.”

Activists have livestreamed following agents to their homes, posted addresses on social media, mailed postcards reading “Beware! Your neighbor is an ICE agent,” and circulated personal information tied to high-profile operations.

ICE’s Office of Professional Responsibility has investigated more than 100 cases involving doxing and threats between early 2025 and early 2026.

Officials have linked the escalation to political rhetoric that labels agents as “Gestapo” or “Nazis,” while noting that the same environment has produced vehicle rammings, physical assaults, and online campaigns encouraging attacks.

Via https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/10/hackers-dump-records-41000-dhs-employees-including-undercover/