US Strikes, Seizes Iranian Cargo Ship

US seized nearly 1 million barrels of Iranian oil being smuggled to ...

Zero Hedge

Summary

  • Trump renews threats if no deal is reached: “No More Mr. Nice Guy”
  • Trump says U.S. struck and seized Iranian-flagged cargo ship in Gulf of Oman
  • Tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz has ground to a halt after multiple incidents (Iran renewed threats to close the Bab al-Mandeb Strait)
  • Vance to lead negotiations with Iran, along with Witkoff and Kushner, on Tuesday or Wednesday
  • “We are still far from the final discussion,”  said speaker of the Iranian parliament Ghalibaf

US Struck and Seized Iranian-flagged Cargo Ship on Gulf Of Oman

With markets still closed for now, President Trump just posted on his Truth Social platform that the US military just struck and seized an Iranian-flagged cargo ship in the Gulf of Oman.

Today, an Iranian-flagged cargo ship named TOUSKA, nearly 900 feet long and weighing almost as much as an aircraft carrier, tried to get past our Naval Blockade, and it did not go well for them.

The U.S. Navy Guided Missile Destroyer USS SPRUANCE intercepted the TOUSKA in the Gulf of Oman, and gave them fair warning to stop.

The Iranian crew refused to listen, so our Navy ship stopped them right in their tracks by blowing a hole in the engineroom.

Right now, U.S. Marines have custody of the vessel.

The TOUSKA is under U.S. Treasury Sanctions because of their prior history of illegal activity.

We have full custody of the ship, and are seeing what’s on board!

According to CENTCOM, American forces issued multiple warnings and informed the Iranian-flagged vessel it was in violation of the U.S. blockade.

After Touska’s crew failed to comply with repeated warnings over a six-hour period, Spruance directed the vessel to evacuate its engine room.

Spruance disabled Touska’s propulsion by firing several rounds from the destroyer’s 5-inch MK 45 Gun into Touska’s engine room.

U.S. Marines from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit later boarded the non-compliant vessel, which remains in U.S. custody.

American forces acted in a deliberate, professional, and proportional manner to ensure compliance.

Since the blockade’s commencement, U.S. forces have directed 25 commercial vessels to turn around or return to an Iranian port.

Now we wait and see the reaction as futures open and the vocal (and kinetic) action is wound back in.

Record highs in stocks provides just the kind of backdrop for Trump to press his ‘escalated to de-escalate’ strategy into the end of the ceasefire.

Tanker Traffic Through Strait Halted

By Sunday morning, the latest Bloomberg ship tracking data showed that tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz had largely ground to a halt.

There were multiple incidents of tankers U-turning over the last 24 hours.

At the same time, a senior Iranian official renewed threats to close the Bab al-Mandeb Strait.

The Hormuz chokepoint (closed once again after briefly opening on Friday morning) comes as the US blockade of Iranian ports remains in place and US-Iran diplomatic channels appear active..

The odds of shipping traffic returning to normal on the Hormuz by the end of the month are currently around 28% on Polymarket. Those odds just hours ago, early Sunday, stood around 18%.

[…]

Vance to Lead Negotiations with Iran

President Trump told Fox News that special envoy Steve Witkoff is traveling to Pakistan for talks with Iranian negotiators, suggesting the Trump team and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio are still pursuing a negotiated off-ramp.

Separately, Trump wrote on Truth Social that his representatives “will be there tomorrow evening, for Negotiations.”

The meetings in Islamabad will be “Tuesday possibly into Wednesday,” Trump told Fox News in a call Sunday morning, the outlet reported.

Yet Iranian state media reported Sunday that Tehran had “rejected” the second round of talks.

Iran’s “absence” from the talks, the report said, was a result of “Washington’s excessive demands, unrealistic expectations, constant shifts in stance, repeated contradictions, and the ongoing naval blockade, which it considers a breach of the ceasefire.”

Confirmation of another round of upcoming US-Iran talks comes one day after Iran shuttered the Hormuz, citing the US Naval blockade that remains in place.

Overnight, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, speaker of the Iranian parliament, admitted on national television that there had been “progress” with Washington, but that there were many gaps and some fundamental points remained.

“We are still far from the final discussion,” said Ghalibaf, one of Tehran’s top negotiators.

Ghalibaf continued, “If America does not lift the blockade, traffic in the Strait of Hormuz will definitely be limited.”

Trump has accused Tehran of getting “a little cute” with its flip-flopping on the strait that was reopened on Friday but abruptly closed on Saturday morning.

The ceasefire is set to expire Wednesday.

Trump Renews Threats: “No More Mr. Nice Guy”

Trump also renewed threats made earlier this month to “knock out every single Power Plant, and every single Bridge, in Iran” if no deal is reached, warning that “they’ll come down fast, they’ll come down easy.”

[…]

Via https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/no-more-mr-nice-guy-trump-sends-witkoff-pakistan-us-iran-talks-hormuz-traffic-freezes

 

EU’s New Age Verification App: Hacked in Two Minutes

Ken Macon

The European Union’s age verification app arrived on Wednesday with a promise that it was “technically ready” for deployment across the bloc. Within hours, security researchers had torn it apart.

Commission President Ursula von der Leyen presented the tool in Brussels as the answer to a continent-wide push to keep minors off social media and adult websites. “It is fully open source. Everyone can check the code,” von der Leyen said. Researchers took her at her word. What they found has turned the launch into exactly the kind of security embarrassment that should make anyone think twice about digital identity systems.

Security consultant Paul Moore published a widely shared post on X documenting what he discovered after examining the GitHub repository. The app stores sensitive data on users’ phones and leaves it unprotected. Moore claimed he hacked it in under two minutes.

Brussels is standing by its product. “Yes, it is ready. Maybe we can add, ‘and it can always be improved’,” Chief Spokesperson Paula Pinho told reporters Friday. Digital spokesperson Thomas Regnier added a revealing clarification. “Now, when we say it’s a final version, it’s … still a demo version.” He said the final product is not yet available for citizens and “the code will be constantly updated and improved … I cannot today exclude or prejudge if further updates will be required or not.”

Moore led the technical takedown on X, describing the app’s architecture as broken at the foundation. The encrypted PIN the app stores locally, according to Moore, has no cryptographic link to the identity vault holding the actual verification data.

That gap enables a bypass that requires no exploit code or specialized tools. Delete a few specific values from the app’s configuration files, restart the app, set a new PIN, and the software happily hands over access to credentials that belong to the previous profile. Identity data gets reused under whatever access control the attacker defines.

The weaknesses deepen from there. Rate limiting, the standard defense against someone trying PIN after PIN until one works, lives in the same editable configuration file as a plain counter. Set it to zero and the app forgets every failed attempt.

[…]

Via https://reclaimthenet.org/eu-age-verification-app-hacked-in-two-minutes

IRGC compels US forces to leave Hormuz Strait after attack on Iranian ship

IRGC forces US troops to leave Hormuz Strait after attack on Iranian ship

Press TV

The Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) has compelled US forces stationed in the Sea of Oman to retreat and leave the area after they fired at an Iranian merchant ship, a report said.

According to a report by Mehr news agency on Sunday, US naval forces stationed in the waters surrounding the Sea of Oman fired at an Iranian merchant ship to force it to return to the Iranian territorial waters.

It added that the US move was in response to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz and the return of Indian and British merchant ships as well as the control measures by the IRGC.

However, it emphasized, the Americans were forced to retreat and leave the area following the “timely presence and rapid response” of the IRGC naval units in support of the Iranian ship.

The US announced a naval blockade on Iran after failing to reach its military objectives in a joint war of aggression with Israel against the country that started in late February.

The move came in response to Iran’s effective imposition of restrictions on transit via the Strait of Hormuz, a key waterway in the Persian Gulf which is responsible for a fifth of global oil demand.

Iran on Friday briefly eased its restrictions on the passage of non-hostile commercial shipping in the Strait amid efforts to negotiate a permanent end to the war.

“However, due to the violation of the ceasefire conditions, and as the American adversary has not lifted the naval blockade on Iranian vessels and ports, the Strait of Hormuz has been closed as of this evening until this blockade is removed,” the IRGC said.

Earlier on Sunday, Tasnim news agency reported that Iranian Armed Forces intercepted two oil tankers sailing under the flags of Botswana and Angola in the Strait of Hormuz and turned them back.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/04/19/767185/IRGC-forces-US-troops-to-leave-Hormuz-Strait-after-attack-on-Iranian-ship-Report%C2%A0

Israel attacks three nations for alleged backing of Iran

Israel attacks three nations for alleged backing of Iran

RT

19 Apr, 2026 15:19

Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations has lashed out at his French, Chinese, and Pakistani counterparts, accusing their countries of effectively backing Iran by allegedly striking deals to secure safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz.

The rebuke appears to stem from media reports which recently indicated that commercial vessels from all three countries were able to transit the Strait of Hormuz during the blockade, in some cases with Iranian authorization, despite broader restrictions on shipping imposed by Tehran.

“I asked the French ambassador: How much money did you pay Iran to move ships safely through the Strait of Hormuz?” Danny Danon said in a post on X shortly after speaking at the UN General Assembly session on the Strait of Hormuz blockade.

“Surprisingly, he had no answer,” he wrote, adding: “The ambassadors of China and Pakistan also had no answer.”

Navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, a key route handling around 20% of global oil and liquefied natural gas flows, has been disrupted since Tehran effectively blocked the waterway in response to the US-Israeli bombing campaign that began on February 28.

On Friday, Iran opened the Strait to all commercial vessels, framing the move as part of ceasefire arrangements linked to the Israel–Lebanon truce, but closed it again the following day. The decision came as US President Donald Trump said the US blockade on Iranian ports and shipping would remain in force until a peace deal is reached. Washington imposed the restrictions after bilateral talks in Pakistan collapsed last weekend.

In March, Iran said that vessels of India, China, Russia, Iraq, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka would be allowed to pass through the crucial waterway. Beijing is ranked as the biggest buyer of Iranian oil and most of its supplies pass through the chokepoint. At the same time, Malaysian authorities thanked Tehran for allowing the passage of the country’s ships.

In April, the Financial Times reported, citing the tracking data, that a container ship owned by a French shipping company had sailed through the Strait of Hormuz along with several other ships.

At the UN, France previously voted in favor of resolutions condemning Iran’s blockade of the strait, China either vetoed the measures or voted against critical wording, while Pakistan abstained.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/638717-israel-iran-china-pakistan-france/

Iran rebuffs Trump announcement of new peace talks

Ships and tankers in the Strait of Hormuz off the coast of Musandam, Oman, April 18, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer/File Photo

WASHINGTON/ISLAMABAD, April 19 (Reuters) – Iran rejected new peace talks with the United States, its state news agency reported on Sunday, hours after U.S. President Donald Trump had said he was sending envoys to Pakistan for talks and would strike Iran unless it accepted his terms.

Trump posted on Truth Social that his envoys would arrive on ‌Monday evening for negotiations, a timetable that would leave only a day for talks to make progress before a two-week ceasefire ends.

“We’re offering a very fair and reasonable DEAL, and I hope they ‌take it because, if they don’t, the United States is going to knock out every single Power Plant, and every single Bridge, in Iran,” he wrote. “NO MORE MR. NICE GUY!”

Iran’s official IRNA news agency cited no specific source in its report that Iran had ​rejected the talks.

“Iran stated that its absence from the second round of talks stems from what it called Washington’s excessive demands, unrealistic expectations, constant shifts in stance, repeated contradictions, and the ongoing naval blockade, which it considers a breach of the ceasefire,” IRNA wrote.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Iran’s rejection of the talks.

STRAIT OF HORMUZ STILL SHUT

A White House official had said the U.S. delegation would be headed by Vice President JD Vance, who led the war’s first peace talks a week ago, and also include Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff and son-in-law Jared Kushner. Trump had initially told ABC News and MS Now that Vance would not go.

The apparent ‌diplomatic setback came with shipping still blocked in the Strait of Hormuz, ⁠and could set the stage for a renewed surge in oil prices when markets reopen after the weekend within a few hours.

Iran’s chief negotiator, Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, had earlier said the two sides had made progress but were still far apart on nuclear issues and the strait.

Iran has blocked the strait to ships other than its own since ⁠the United States and Israel attacked on February 28. It announced on Friday that it would reopen the waterway. But it reversed that decision on Saturday after Trump declined to lift a U.S. blockade of Iranian ports.

[…]

Via https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-iran-cite-progress-talks-010120693.html

Thousands of Israelis Rally Against Netanyahu in Tel Aviv and Other Cities

Thousands of Israelis rallied in Tel Aviv and other cities to demand an inquiry into Prime Minister Netanyahu’s cabinet failures, accusing him of pursuing aimless, prolonged wars and abandoning soldiers and civilians to die.

Via https://t.me/presstv/186248

Iran war ‘supercharges’ deterioration in Israel’s ties with US

US President Donald Trump (left) meets with Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel at the White House, April 7, 2025, in Washington.

Press TV

April 18, 2026

The joint US-Israeli military aggression against Iran “supercharges” deterioration in the regime’s relations with Washington, as President Donald Trump’s failure to secure a victory accelerates a historic shift in both public opinion and the broader political landscape, says a report.

According to US publication Axios, a dramatic wave of opposition is sweeping through the US political landscape, signaling a decisive break in Washington’s decades of unconditional military backing for the Israeli regime.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, it said, is “torching” Washington’s support for Tel Aviv for a generation as the war he dragged the US into “supercharges a deterioration in relations with the US.”

According to Axios, Netanyahu “is wreaking havoc on Israel’s standing with Americans.”

The news outlet wrote that the regime’s polling collapse among younger Americans is now hitting the US Congress, too.

It said lawmakers who started out staunchly pro-Israel are becoming increasingly vocal critics.

“We need to have a discussion about how to normalize that relationship and what change is necessary; there’s no doubt about that,” Axios quoted Rep. Jason Crow as saying.

According to the report, every Senate Democrat who’s eyeing a 2028 presidential run voted against arms sales to the Israeli regime in votes earlier this week.

Support for unconditional military aid to Israel has fractured dramatically, with 40 members voting on a resolution to block arms sales, up from just 15 on a similar vote last April.

Netanyahu is “destroying the bipartisan nature in terms of support for Israel,” according to Sen. Ruben Gallego.

Meanwhile, some Democrats on the House are turning against funding for Israel’s Iron Dome missile defense system, a move that according to Rep. Maxwell Frost was “seen as insanely fringe four years ago.”

Many Democrats who voted for Iron Dome in 2021 told Axios “they’re done providing financial aid” for the Israeli regime.

Launching an unprovoked war on Iran along with the Israeli regime on February 28, Trump failed to offer even a shred of credible explanation to the American nation.

Instead, the Trump administration kept offering justifications that have ranged from thwarting what they claimed to be an imminent attack by Iran to crippling its nuclear program and regime change.

Despite Trump’s repeated claims of victory over Iran, the war has increasingly been viewed within Washington and across the world as a total failure.

The military aggression has not only failed to achieve its primary military objectives, but it has also drawn the United States into a costly and open-ended quagmire.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/04/18/767125/Iran-war-supercharges-deterioration-in-Israel-s-ties-with-US-Report

Donald Trump Pulls the Trigger and the World Goes “Boom!”

By Phillip Giraldi

Many Americans are coming around to the view, based on what comes out of President Donald Trump’s mouth and what he writes down on his Truth Social site, that the US Head of State is insane.

Larry Johnson is reporting “shocking details of what is going on behind the scene at the White House [where] Donald Trump began exhibiting signs of early dementia in September 2025… He frequently confabulates, he routinely loses his temper and unleashes screaming rants, and he is incapable of doing critical thinking. [As a result] Trump’s senior White House staff are behaving like children with an abusive, drug-addled father… i.e., they walk on egg shells fearful of saying anything that might ignite Trump’s rage.”

And the American public is beginning to pick up on the dysfunction. A broad understanding is developing among voters that the war against Iran undeniably has nothing to do with actual American national or security interests and has been covered by a tissue of scarcely credible lies and dissimulations to conceal the truth.

This wide divide between truth and fiction has become clear to nearly everyone. And the actual source of the war, which is enabling and “helping” Israel to destroy Iran, has become increasingly evident to the public as well, as has the reality that the brutal war criminal Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu controls both Trump and most of the US Congress.

Beyond his mental breakdown, Trump’s foreign and domestic policies are characterized by their belligerency, full of threats directed against imaginary enemies, friends and allies unwilling to go to war for nothing, and anyone in the media or among the public who dares to criticize what comes out of the White House. That means that Trump is not only crazy he is a dangerous psychopath in his preferred interaction with political and social developments that he is supposed to be examining rationally to benefit the United States and the American people.

So what we Americans get is wars plus killing of fishermen in international waters as well as abductions and assassination of foreign politicians and even bombing school girls for no reasons at all. When he is on a roll, Trump is full of threats to “obliterate” foreign countries, and includes unconscionable diatribes against folks like the Roman Catholic Pope Leo for daring to ask for an end to wars and to seek peaceful coexistence among nations. After Trump posted an Artificial Intelligence picture of himself as Jesus, the Pope argued “Woe to those who manipulate religion and the very name of God for their own military, economic, and political gain, dragging that which is sacred into darkness and filth.” Trump responded by taking aim at the Pope on Truth Social with

“I don’t want a Pope who thinks it’s OK for Iran to have a Nuclear Weapon. I don’t want a Pope who thinks it’s terrible that America attacked Venezuela… and I don’t want a Pope who criticizes the President of the United States because I’m doing exactly what I was elected, IN A LANDSLIDE, to do… If I wasn’t in the White House, Leo wouldn’t be in the Vatican. Unfortunately, Leo’s Weak on Crime, Weak on Nuclear Weapons, does not sit well with me…Leo should get his act together as Pope, use Common Sense, stop catering to the Radical Left, and focus on being a Great Pope, not a Politician.”

The attack on the Pope was followed by a summoning of the Vatican’s Washington based diplomatic top representative in the US Cardinal Christophe Pierre to the Pentagon where he received a “bitter lecture” and warning that lest the Pope behaves there will be retaliation employing the superior military might of the United States.

In January Cardinal Pierre had been warned that the United States has the military power to do “whatever it wants” and that Pope Leo, the first American-born pontiff, “better take its side” over US interference in Latin America. Interestingly, on the night following Pierre’s Pentagon visit there was a bomb threat directed against the Pope’s brother in Illinois, perhaps intended to send a message! The good side of that Trumpean rant and the hateful behavior of his supporters, which has produced outrage not only among Catholics, might well be that Trump will lose his majority in Congress and could even be impeached, hopefully successfully this time around.

Trump is also outraging America’s former loyal allies in NATO. One might argue reasonably that NATO has outlived its relevance but that is not the argument Trump is making. He wants NATO to fully support his illegal war of aggression in Iran and also ignore Israel’s war crime of genocide in Gaza. Spain was the first country to deny use of its NATO airbases and its airspace to US warplanes transiting to attack Iran. England, the most loyal lapdog of all, has also turned non-cooperative with Prime Minister Keir Starmer denying use of British airbases in both the UK and Cyprus and declaring that he has had enough of Trump.

But perhaps the cruelest cut of all came from Italy, which was outraged by Trump’s attack on the Pope. Prime Minister Georgia Meloni, hitherto a strong Trump European supporter, struck back against the US President, first deciding that Italy would no longer supply arms to Israel before declaring that Rome would stand by the Pope in his condemnation of war while also finding Trump’s denunciation of the Pontiff “unacceptable.” She elaborated that

“The Pope is the head of the Catholic Church, and it is right and normal that he calls for peace and condemns every form of war.”

Trump, who has given Israel $880 million in new bombs just this week to continue its depredations while also surging thousands more troops to the Middle East, of course went on the offensive. In a subsequent interview with the Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera, Trump responded that Meloni is “unacceptable,” and Iran “would blow up Italy in two minutes if they had the chance.”

But unfortunately there is much more than the trading of insults at stake in the Donald Trump debacle. We now know the extent to which Netanyahu and Israel control Trump and a large part of our government, so much so that Netanyahu boasts of having Vice President Vance and the White House staff “report to him daily.” That means that the likelihood that the Israelis will have US backing to use their “secret” nuclear weapons to strike and destroy Iran if the war is resumed and is going against them, which is quite possible, maybe even likely. They might also have the leverage to get an ignorant and aggressive Trump to use America’s nukes on Iran, the first employment of such weapons since their use on World War 2 Japan in 1945. As Netanyahu and his intelligence chiefs appear to have regular access to the White House including being able to convince a gullible Trump falsely that the war against Iran would be a cakewalk, they might be able to talk him into using America’s nukes to finish the Persian job, possibly coupled with some lies to the tune that Iran was about to use its hidden nukes to strike the United States. The president’s spokesperson and leading sycophant Karoline Leavitt has assured us that the president is looking at “all options” regarding Iran and just what do you think that means? This would accomplish the same goal of destroying Iran without the onus of Israel being the source of yet another appalling war crime since it already has plenty of such crimes to its credit in Gaza and Lebanon.

I have previously suggested that Israel could energize US military activity against Iran in particular by staging some kind of false flag attack on American forces in the Persian Gulf region while making it appear to have been done by the Iranians. With the possibility that Trump might go nuclear rolling around in my head I decided to do some research into how easy it would be for him to start a nuclear war without any real provocation on the part of anyone to justify it. To my astonishment, it would be very easy, in fact, certainly within the capabilities of a mentally addled insane man. Indeed, there is pretty much nothing in the process to go nuclear that would stop Trump and prevent him from acting out his “feelings,” as he is wont to put it.

So for the benefit of all those, like myself, who want to learn what happens when the United States President pushes the so-called button or pulls the trigger, whichever metaphor one prefers, to start a nuclear war, I will outline what I have discovered. The biggest surprise to me was that there are not really any checks and balances on what takes place to make sure that no president is making a mistake or exceeding authority to go nuclear. Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution states that “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States” and both courts and legal scholars have long interpreted this clause as giving the President direct command over military operations, including decisions about when and how to use specific weapons. Indeed, no statute or constitutional provision requires the President to get approval from anyone else before ordering a nuclear strike.

The President’s status as Commander-in-Chief of all US military forces includes those delivery systems for nuclear weapons, and he has absolute authority to launch when, in his or her judgement, there is a proportionate imminent threat coming from a hostile state. Which de facto authority is not to say that there has not been a legal debate over the context of using a nuclear weapon. When incoming warheads are minutes away, there is virtually no legal debate: the President has full authority to respond with nuclear force without seeking prior authorization from Congress. The War Powers Resolution itself recognizes that the President’s Commander-in-Chief powers as the sole nuclear launch authority may be exercised in response to “a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.”

But a nuclear first strike is a different story, raising the issue of possible use against Iran. If a President contemplates using nuclear weapons preemptively, before any attack has begun or become imminent, there is a strong legal argument that congressional authorization is required. The Constitution gives only to Congress the power to declare war, and initiating nuclear hostilities without an imminent threat looks far more like starting a war than responding to one. Many legal scholars would agree that a President must seek congressional authorization before ordering a first use of nuclear weapons in any non-emergency scenario.

Nevertheless, in practice, every President retains the physical ability to order a first strike without asking Congress first as the launch system does not distinguish between retaliatory and first-use orders. The button to push is located on an electronic “nuclear football” that is carried around in close proximity to wherever the president is at by a military aide.

The control football includes a number of features that require confirmation of the action ordered and the targets as well as the identity of the originator who must be the president, or, in his absence, the vice president. That done, the electronics essentially enable a launch order programmed to carry out whatever aggressive action the president or vice president has chosen to engage in. If the US is actually under attack, the entire process from first detection of “incomings” to US missiles leaving their silos can take roughly 25 minutes. The President’s role is limited to approximately 10 minutes during which he or she has to inter alia make a judgement call regarding the legitimacy of what he has been informed of to justify beginning a nuclear war.

There are various other issues involved in staging a nuclear strike, but the fact is that Donald Trump even in his mentally addled state could no doubt both legally and practically initiate a nuclear weapons attack on Iran or any other country based on his “feelings” about what is going on with that country’s foreign policy. In shaping any such a judgement he will no doubt have plenty of false information fed to him by his good friend Benjamin Netanyahu. Netanyahu, of course, has his own nuclear arsenal but most likely has a mindset that impels him to let the Americans do the work and pay whatever price becomes relevant to the horror that would no doubt be the worldwide response. Trump, to be sure, is the second president in a row who has not been of sound mind and the danger that he might stumble into doing something awful is all too real. It would be reasonable to suggest that it is past time for Congress to act to disable the “nuclear football” in any situation where the United States is not itself actually and demonstrably under attack. The thought that Donald Trump might be considering pulling the nuclear trigger to make Israel happy is just too frightening to bear but Americans must be aware of that possibility!

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/donald-trump-pulls-the-trigger-and-the-world-goes-boom/5922845

Hezbollah’s Fiber Optic Controlled Missile-laden Drones Pose Serious Threat to ‘Israel’ in Any Upcoming Battle

Uprooted Palestinians

18/4/2026

The Zionist newspaper Yediot Ahronot reports if fighting resumes, Hezbollah is expected to intensify its use of missile-laden drones connected via fiber optics.

The Israeli newspaper “Yedioth Ahronoth” stated that the importance of these drones lies in their resistance to jamming, quiet operation, precise guidance, and ability to cover the entire area of ​​operations of the “army” in southern Lebanon, up to the border settlements.

Yedioth Ahronoth” reported that Hezbollah used this type of drone extensively against Israeli army forces in southern Lebanon, as well as against border targets inside ‘Israel’, which imposes on ‘Israel’ finding a solution to this threat.

Related Videos

[…]

Via https://uprootedpalestinians.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/hezbollahs-missile-laden-drones-connected-via-fiber-optics-poses-serious-threat-to-israel-in-any-upcoming-battle-yedioth-ahronoth/