After Four Years of Censorship: Mainstream Media Now Confirms that “COVID Jabs May be to Blame for Increase in Excess Deaths”

Posted on by
Reply
Image
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky and Sarah Knapton
July 27, 2026

“Covid Jabs May be to Blamed for Increase in Excess Deaths”

If this report by The Telegraph had been published in early 2021, tens of thousands of lives  would have been saved.

But in 2021, censorship was imposed. Honest journalism was silenced. The media was supportive of the fear campaign.

The Telegraph report by Science Editor Sara Knapton, 5 June 2024 pertains to:

Researchers from The Netherlands analysed data from 47 Western countries and discovered there had been more than three million excess deaths since 2020, with the trend continuing despite the rollout of vaccines and containment measures.

They said the “unprecedented” figures “raised serious concerns” and called on governments to fully investigate the underlying causes, including possible vaccine harms.

Writing in the BMJ Public Health, the authors from Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, said: “Although Covid-19 vaccines were provided to guard civilians from suffering morbidity and mortality by the Covid-19 virus, suspected adverse events have been documented as well.

“Both medical professionals and citizens have reported serious injuries and deaths following vaccination to various official databases in the Western World.”

Click here to read the full article on The Telegraph.

This Is the Unspoken Truth

From early 2021, coinciding with the rollout of the Covid vaccine, an upward trend in Covid vaccine related deaths has unfolded. There is an increase in Excess Mortality attributable to the Covid Vaccine. Ironically, Three years later the mainstream media is now reporting (See Telegraph above) on Covid related vaccine excess mortality. 

Excess Mortality Triggered by the Covid 19 “Vaccine” (2020-2022)

Below is a graph pertaining to Excess Mortality in Germany (all Causes), which points to the Deviation of Observed Mortality from Expected Mortality (by age group) in 2020, 2021, and 2022.

Notice the upward shift in excess mortality in 2021 and 2022 following the rollout of the Covid Vaccine in December 2020. This Tendency described for Germany is Worldwide.

Mainstream Media Disinformation

Back in 2021 the mainstream media played a key role in sustaining disinformation regarding the Covid vaccine. It was part of the propaganda apparatus. It was instrumental in sustaining the fear campaign. 

The mainstream media also provided legitimacy to a regime of censorship, threats, penalties, dismissals of  scientists and scholars at major universities, the firing of doctors and nurses at  hospitals “for telling the truth”, not to mention the insidious role of “Big Money” foundations in the bribing and cooptation of politicians in more than 190 countries, And much more.

People Worldwide have lived through this crisis. Many lives have been destroyed. Without media censorship and the suppression of the truth, this crisis would not have occurred. 

It is worth noting that the media is generously funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. One oF 10 Grants from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to The British Broadcasting Corporation BBC 

[…]

This crisis affects humanity in its entirety, namely the planet’s 8 billion people who are the victims of fake science, fraud and corruption. Profits in the billions of dollars are the driving-force behind this diabolical agenda. “Killing is Good for Business”. What we are witnessing is a crime against humanity on an unprecedented scale, affecting the lives of the entire population of our  planet.

The WHO as well as some 190 national governments are complicit in the Covid vaccine roll-out. Concurrently,  the media in the course of the last five years, has been spinning the lies on behalf of both the governments and Big Pharma. The official data pertaining to vaccine related deaths and adverse events is not mentioned.

[…]

Flashback to November 2020. Fraudulent BBC Report

[…]

A couple of weeks prior to the official launch of the mRNA vaccine in early November 2020, the BBC featured a timely Covid media report entitled:

“Covid: Why is the Virus such a Threat”?

According to the BBC, quoting and misquoting “scientific opinion” the virus had developed “A hit and run killer evolutionary tactic” with a view to spreading the Covid-19 infection far and wide. The unspoken objective of this report by BBC Science Correspondent James Gallagher was to “scare the British public”, sustain the fear campaign while also promoting acceptance of the Covid mRNA vaccine.

The article was based on the “authoritative voice” of Prof Lehner of Cambridge University, an Infectious Diseases Physician at Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge:

[…]

What Rubbish! 

“Covid: Why is coronavirus such a threat?  Answer: media disinformation and the fear campaign.

According to the BBC: A microscopic virus with an outright terrorist agenda?

This frivolous BBC report personifies the so-called “virus that does not care”, with a view to creating panic, quoting the incautious statements of a Cambridge scientist, who’s on the payroll of Big Pharma’s Wellcome Trust.

In turn the “Hit and Run Virus” (rather than corrupt governments) is blamed for having “ordered the lockdown” (March 11, 2020), imposed on 190 countries, which has created economic and social havoc Worldwide.

What is at stake is the criminalization of the mainstream media for having misled millions of people in the course of the last 3 years, thereby sustaining the lies of Big Pharma  and  the corrupt directives of  politicians, not to mention the fraudulent statements of the Director General of the WHO, Dr. Tedros.

What’s now happening is that the BBC acknowledges that people are dying but “experts are not sure why”,

Guess who is funding the BBC’s  Fraudulent Scientific Analysis. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

[…]

The BBC “Conspiracy Theories”

The BBC accuses alleged conspiracy theorists, of stating that the Covid vaccine is ‘not safe”.

“In recent years there has been a growth in online conspiracy theories, which suggest vaccines like the Covid jab are dangerous or ineffective.Mr Ward said he’s “worried that people may believe the conspiracy theories”.But he insists “they are just that, they’re just conspiracy theories. What I’m going on is the facts”.

He said: “All of the international evidence is that the vaccines we give out in the UK are safe, they are highly effective and they’ll protect you from some really horrible diseases.”

At the same time, the BBC  describes the SARS-CoV-2 virus being involved in a “conspiratorial”  “hit and run killer evolutionary tactic” [SIC] (See BBC, James Gallagher, October 22, 2020)

Criminality at the Level of the Entire Planet

Some 14 billion doses of Covid vaccine have been administered Worldwide, 1.75 doses per person for a World population of 8 billion.

In early December 2023, the number of vaccine doses worldwide recorded by the WHO was of the order of 14 billion: an average of 1.75 vaccine doses per person for a World population of 8 billion people. (13,595,583,1250 recorded by the WHO on November 23, 2023)

Had the media truthfully reported on the nature of the Covid vaccine and its devastating impacts, millions of lives would have been saved. At this juncture, with the exception of Africa, 75% of the World population has already been vaccinated. There is no moving backwards.

The governments and national health authorities in cahoots with Big Pharma were fully aware from the very outset that the Covid-19 “vaccine” was conducive to an upward trend in mortality and morbidity.

Doctors For Covid Ethics (D4CE)

Doctors for Covid Ethics issued a broad statement in July 2021 based on the data of EudraVigilance, (EU, EEA, Switzerland), MHRA (UK) and VAERS (USA):

“more deaths and injuries from the COVID-!9 “vaccine” roll-out than from all previous vaccines combined since records began.”

The signal of harm is now indisputably overwhelming, and, in line with universally accepted ethical standards for clinical trials, Doctors for Covid Ethics demands that the COVID-19 “vaccination” programme be halted immediately worldwide.

Continuation of the programme, in the full knowledge of ongoing serious harm and death to both adults and children, constitutes Crimes Against Humanity/Genocide, for which those found to be responsible or complicit will ultimately be held personally liable.

The Secret “Classified” Pfizer Report

Another important document which was available to national health authorities in the US, was the “confidential” report by Pfizer. This report which was made public under freedom of information (FOI) in October 2021 is a bombshell.

The vaccine was launched in mid-December 2020. By the end of February 2021, “Pfizer had already received more than 1,200 reports of deaths allegedly caused by the vaccine and tens of thousands of reported adverse events, including 23 cases of spontaneous abortions out of 270 pregnancies and more than 2,000 reports of cardiac disorders.”

The data collected from mid-December 2020 to the end of February 2021 unequivocally confirms “Manslaughter”.

Based on the evidence, Pfizer had the responsibility to immediately cancel and withdraw the “vaccine”. Murder as opposed to Manslaughter implies “Criminal Intent”. From a legal standpoint it is an “Act of Murder” applied Worldwide to a target population of 8 billion people.

Click here to read the complete Pfizer report.  

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/breaking-covid-jabs-blame-increase-excess-deaths-telegraph/5859006

The Cancer Prevention Revolution Is Already Here – Mainstream Medicine Just Won’t Admit It

Posted on by
Reply
By Paul Anthony Taylor
July 27, 2026

For decades, conventional medicine has largely dismissed vitamin C as little more than the micronutrient that prevents scurvy.

In a highly significant development, however, an important new study has concluded that this humble molecule may also have the ability to stop the development of cancer.

Published in the Journal of Theoretical Biology, the paper describes how vitamin C can block the formation of potentially cancer-causing chemicals during digestion.

For supporters of Cellular Medicine, of course, such findings are less a surprise than a further powerful confirmation that Dr. Matthias Rath was right all along.

The new study proposes that taking a vitamin C supplement shortly after eating meals could reduce the production of chemicals known as N-nitroso compounds. These compounds are produced from nitrates and nitrites, chemicals that occur naturally in vegetables such as spinach and beetroot but are also widely used as preservatives in processed meats.

Inside the body, nitrates and nitrites perform useful functions, such as helping to regulate blood flow and supporting cardiovascular health. However, under certain conditions in the acidic environment of the stomach, they can also be converted into N-nitroso compounds, many of which are suspected or known to increase the risk of cancer.

Scientists have long struggled to explain why nitrate-rich vegetables are consistently associated with better health while processed meats have repeatedly been linked to a higher cancer risk. If both contain nitrates or nitrites, they wonder, why don’t they produce the same effects?

The Protective Effect of Vitamin C and Other Antioxidants

The authors of the new study, who are based at the University of Waterloo in Canada, believe their research has uncovered an important piece of the puzzle. To better understand the interactions that take place, they built a complex mathematical model that examines what happens to nitrates, nitrites, and vitamin C as food passes through the body. Their model takes into account factors such as the role of the salivary glands, stomach, small intestine, and blood plasma.

The findings are striking. When vitamin C was present during the digestive processing of dietary nitrates and nitrites, it markedly reduced the formation of harmful nitrosation products that can eventually lead to the production of cancer-associated N-nitroso compounds. Vitamin C acts as a powerful antioxidant, intercepting highly reactive nitrogen compounds before they can form cancer-associated chemicals. Instead of allowing these dangerous chemical reactions to proceed, vitamin C effectively diverted them towards harmless end products.

This observation neatly explains why vegetables rich in nitrates don’t behave like processed meats. Leafy green vegetables naturally provide generous amounts of vitamin C and other protective antioxidants alongside their nitrates. In other words, nature supplies both the compound and its built-in protection in the same food. Processed meats, by contrast, often contain nitrites but little or none of the vitamin C needed to block the harmful cancer-causing reactions.

The study therefore points to a simple but powerful conclusion. It is not merely exposure to nitrates or nitrites that matters. Equally important is whether the body has enough protective micronutrients available at exactly the right time to neutralize potentially dangerous chemical reactions before they can damage cells.

Dr. Rath was Right

The finding fits remarkably well with a growing body of scientific evidence showing that vitamin C plays multiple roles in protecting against cancer. Beyond helping to reduce the formation of carcinogenic nitroso compounds, vitamin C also acts as one of the body’s most important antioxidants, protecting DNA from oxidative damage, supporting healthy immune function, promoting collagen production that helps maintain the integrity of tissues and blood vessels, and contributing to the normal regulation of numerous cellular processes involved in tumor development.

For long-time supporters of Cellular Medicine, however, these facts will come as no surprise. More than two decades ago, Dr. Matthias Rath and his research team opened an entirely new direction in cancer research. At the 19th Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference in 2002, they presented groundbreaking research demonstrating that a specific micronutrient combination consisting of vitamin C, the amino acids lysine and proline, and the green tea extract epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) could dramatically inhibit the spread of cancer cells. Their research focused on strengthening the body’s connective tissue and preventing cancer cells from breaking through this natural barrier, thereby attacking one of the key mechanisms that allows tumors to invade surrounding tissues and spread throughout the body.

Coming at a time when conventional cancer research remained overwhelmingly focused on surgery, chemotherapy and radiation, Dr. Rath’s discoveries highlighted an entirely different approach based on correcting underlying micronutrient deficiencies and restoring normal cellular function. Since then, numerous independent research groups around the world have published further studies investigating the anti-cancer properties of vitamin C and other natural micronutrients. Today, study after study continues to reinforce the principles first established through Dr. Rath’s pioneering work.

An Exciting Future Lies Ahead

Ultimately, the real question raised by this Canadian study is not simply whether vitamin C deserves more attention. It is why it has taken so long for mainstream medicine to acknowledge what independent nutritional research has been demonstrating for decades. While billions of dollars continue to be spent developing ever more expensive cancer drugs, relatively little attention is paid to inexpensive micronutrients that help the body protect itself naturally. One important reason is that vitamin C is a naturally occurring nutrient that cannot be patented. As a result, it attracts only a fraction of the commercial investment devoted to developing new pharmaceutical drugs.

More than twenty years after Dr. Rath and his research team first demonstrated that a targeted combination of vitamin C and other micronutrients could inhibit the spread of cancer cells, the scientific evidence increasingly proves that he was right. Micronutrients are not merely ‘supplements’ to health – they are fundamental to it. As mainstream science slowly catches up, one fact is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore: the first line of defense against cancer isn’t found in a chemotherapy clinic – it begins inside every cell of the human body.

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/cancer-prevention-revolution-mainstream-medicine-wont-admit/5934644

Are Kushner and Witkoff Profiting Off the Iran Negotiations?

Posted on by
1

Harold Black PhD

Negotiations with Iran have a long history of falling apart, so it’s hardly shocking that the latest round — led by two men with no diplomatic background — has collapsed too. Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff built their careers closing real estate deals, not brokering peace between nations. Yet Trump keeps turning to them, having already tapped the pair to handle talks with Russia over Ukraine.

Their track record is not encouraging. Politico has reported that Ukrainian and European officials point to Witkoff’s go-it-alone approach as part of the problem, noting that he has resisted input from experts and allies and has, at times, approached the war as though it were a real estate negotiation rather than a geopolitical conflict.

Compounding the problem, the administration’s downsizing of the State Department has left both the Russia and Iran negotiating teams thin on career diplomats and regional experts. Adding the inexperienced Kushner to the Iran talks only deepens that gap. The administration’s defense is that a small, nimble team beats a large phalanx of diplomats — essentially applying a dealmaker’s mindset to statecraft. But as one official put it, a business mentality only works if you actually understand who you’re dealing with; commercial instincts are no substitute for grasping the region, Islam, and the actual interests of Iran and its allies.

Kushner’s presence on the team raises additional concerns given his family’s long, close relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. More troubling still are allegations that details from the talks have been leaked to Israel, and that Kushner has used his position for personal financial gain. According to Common Dreams, Kushner has simultaneously been courting Middle Eastern governments to invest billions in his private equity firm, Affinity Partners.

https://www.commondreams.org/news/jared-kushner-iran-private-equity

The New York Times has reported that Kushner discussed a potential $5 billion investment from Middle Eastern backers into that fund — notable given that he said in December 2024 the firm wouldn’t need to raise capital for four years, specifically to sidestep conflict-of-interest concerns. I guess he forgot.

Elizabeth Warren has criticized the arrangement, arguing that while American troops face danger in the Middle East, Trump’s envoy is out fundraising for his own firm. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has claimed a fair deal between the US and Iran was within reach before hostilities escalated — though any statement from Iranian officials deserves real skepticism. But Kushner’s firm does do substantial business with foreign partners who have direct stakes in the very conflicts he’s supposed to be neutrally negotiating.

The clearest conflict of interest involves oil. Any settlement with Iran would likely include lifting sanctions on Iranian crude — and Kushner’s clients, including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar, are themselves major oil producers. Since Iran sits outside OPEC, easing those sanctions would boost global supply and could push prices down, cutting against the interests of the very governments Kushner represents commercially. Simultaneously negotiating US foreign policy while collecting substantial fees from foreign governments raises serious legal questions, and at minimum, a clear ethical problem.

Drop Site News has reported an even more explosive claim: that an Iranian official told Vice President Vance – which of course he denies – that Kushner and Witkoff are more focused on using inside knowledge of the talks to profit in financial markets than on reaching an actual agreement. The outlet also cited concerns from Iranian negotiators about Kushner relaying details directly to Netanyahu and an Axios report that Witkoff and Kushner speak with Netanyahu and Israel’s Mossad chief nearly daily. Iran reportedly presented documentation to mediators alleging that people close to Trump were exploiting the war and the diplomatic process to move financial markets.

https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/iran-jd-vance-kushner-witkoff-exploiting-negotiations

In fact, Iran calculated profits that from such alleged manipulation had reached $9 billion and formally requested, in writing, that Iran should share in the proceeds. “We have conveyed through intermediaries that $4.5 billion of this sum should also be allocated to the Iranian side,” the Iranian official said.

Drop Site also quoted an Iranian official describing Witkoff as having no real grasp of diplomacy, claiming he misrepresented Iran’s positions — including on the fate of its enriched uranium stockpile — and that his mistaken read of the talks was passed straight on to Trump. Iran is reportedly pushing for larger negotiating delegations that include actual technical and country experts, noting that during earlier talks in Oman and Switzerland, Witkoff and Kushner arrived without nuclear or subject-matter specialists and seemed unfamiliar with the technical substance of the issue. Iranian negotiators say they laid out their enriched uranium stockpile in detail and viewed their own flexibility as the basis for what Araghchi called, on February 25, a possible “historic opportunity” for an unprecedented deal — an offer Witkoff apparently mischaracterized afterward as a threat to build multiple weapons.

I’d encourage anyone interested to read the full report. Statements from Iranian officials should be taken with real skepticism, but the allegations here are serious regardless: that Kushner and Witkoff used the negotiations for personal profit, that details were funneled directly to Netanyahu and Mossad, and that Iran’s actual positions were misrepresented to the president. Whatever the truth of those specific claims, the broader question stands — why rely on Kushner and Witkoff at all, rather than seasoned diplomats backed by real technical and regional expertise? More troubling is that if all of this is true, it is being done with the president’s knowledge and blessing.

[…]

Via https://haroldblackphd.com/2026/07/28/are-kushner-and-witkoff-profiting-off-the-iran-negotiations/

Big Tech Forcing Consumers to Pay for AI Boom – Voters Pushing Back

Posted on by
Reply

A person holding a sign that reads "NO DATA CENTERS" with "DATA CENTERS" crossed out in a red circle.
From MarketWatch:

Excerpts:

For two years, the power trade was the stock market’s favorite way to own the AI boom without paying Nvidia-sized multiples. Buy anything that generates electricity, the logic went, because every data center needs power and supply is short.

It worked. Independent power producers rerated like technology stocks, and utilities that spent decades as bond proxies suddenly had growth stories.

That blanket logic is now breaking down, with politics as the catalyst.

Voters are angry about electricity bills. Electricity rates rose 7.1% nationally in 2025, according to the Energy Information Administration’s measure of average retail revenue per kilowatt-hour, and are expected to keep climbing.

Brookings noted that a poll earlier this year showed a plurality of voters across party lines see data centers as a direct threat to their home energy costs, and both major U.S. political parties have discovered the issue works.

Every pending utility rate case between now and the November elections is a potential campaign ad.

Which utility stocks survive the next two years will be decided by whether tech companies or consumers pay for the AI build-out. The market has priced the bottleneck. It has not yet priced who gets stuck with the bill.

[…]

Via https://t.me/healthimpact/3703

Massie says US significantly weakened by war on Iran

Posted on by
Reply

Al Mayadeen English

27 July, 2026

United States Representative Thomas Massie said the US has been weakened by the war on Iran, as reports say CENTCOM urged the White House to halt bombing.

United States Representative Thomas Massie said the United States has been “significantly weakened by the war with Iran,” arguing in an X post that the campaign depleted missile-defense systems, drained oil reserves, sacrificed US troops, pushed up consumer prices, increased debt, and sidelined domestic needs “all for Israel.”

The Kentucky Republican’s remarks added fresh political pressure to an already widening debate in Washington over the price of the war on Iran, the scope of US involvement, and the degree to which the White House has tied American military power to “Israel’s” regional agenda. That debate has sharpened as more lawmakers question the administration’s war powers and the long-term cost of the campaign.

CENTCOM urged a pause near the Strait of Hormuz

Massie’s remarks came as Axios reported that Admiral Brad Cooper, the top US military commander in West Asia and head of CENTCOM, advised the Trump administration to halt bombing around the Strait of Hormuz after concluding the two-week assault had reached diminishing returns. Axios said Cooper briefed the Pentagon, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the White House earlier in the week, and that his assessment helped shape Trump’s decision to pause strikes along Iran’s southern coastline and around the strategic waterway.

The report said Cooper warned that most of the assigned targets had already been struck, leaving few objectives whose destruction would materially change the battlefield. In other words, the campaign had begun to run out of useful military targets unless Trump was prepared to escalate the war further.

Air-defense stocks under strain

Meanwhile, General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, warned Trump and War Secretary Pete Hegseth that shortages of air-defense interceptors could reduce Washington’s ability to shield its bases and regional allies if the confrontation escalated again. The warning echoed broader concerns inside the Pentagon about the strain that the war on Iran has placed on US missile-defense inventories.

The New York Times said senior advisers including Caine and Vice President JD Vance raised similar concerns about the shrinking stockpile of Patriot interceptors and other air-defence systems needed to protect US forces across the region. That assessment reportedly played a major role in Trump’s decision to hold back from a larger escalation.

[…]

Via https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/massie-says-the-us-has-been–significantly-weakened–by-war

Netanyahu will reject US demands for withdrawal from Lebanon, Gaza, Syria if asked

Posted on by
Reply
(Photo credit: Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

The Cradle

JUL 27, 2026

Israeli officials repeatedly voiced their intent to occupy sizable sections of their neighbors’ territories indefinitely

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has told cabinet ministers that Washington wants Israeli soldiers to pull back from positions in Syria, Lebanon, and Gaza, and that he does not intend to comply with US demands, Channel 13 reported on 27 July.

The report, which cites unnamed security sources familiar with the matter, states that US officials want the Israeli army to carry out a “series of withdrawals” across the three fronts.

Channel 13 does not state whether Washington is seeking full or partial pullbacks; however, Netanyahu told the ministers that he “intends to stand on my own two feet and resist.”

“I will strongly oppose this and tell them no,” he reportedly said.

The comments come as Netanyahu has set off for Washington for a meeting set for Tuesday with US President Donald Trump, after which he is scheduled to attend the funeral services for Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, one of Washington’s most persistent warmongers and an unwavering backer of Israel, who died on 11 July.

Israeli forces are currently occupying major stretches of land in Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza.

Israel maintains positions in border and hilltop areas in southern Syria, especially near the Golan frontier, where the military has established footholds inside Syrian territory, and regularly conducts raids against locals.

What began as a pretext to aid Druze communities battling Damascus’s extremist troops and Syrian government-backed Bedouin tribes after the ousting of former Syrian president Bashar al-Assad has become a so-called “buffer zone.” Israel has since used it to launch incursions into Lebanon.

In Lebanon, Israel maintains its so-called “Yellow Line” in the south that runs from the Mediterranean coast in the west to the Mount Hermon area in the east, extending around 10 kilometers inland and, in some parts, passing the Litani River.

Israel’s occupation of Lebanon has been marked by repeated ceasefire violations, including near-daily strikes, demolitions, and incursions. Beirut cited more than 2,000 violations in late 2025 alone, while hundreds of thousands of Lebanese remain displaced.

Many dozens of Lebanese villages within the Yellow Line have been completely demolished, with the intent of ethnically cleansing the area and creating a dead zone to which residents cannot return.

According to comments from February by Israeli Minister of War Israel Katz, Israeli troops will be staying in Lebanon and Syria “indefinitely.”

In Gaza, following almost three years of genocide and near-daily ceasefire violations since last October, Israel continued to slowly edge its Yellow Line in the strip further under the cover of night.

The most recent reporting says the controlled area has expanded to about 65 percent of Gaza and that the line has been shifted westward in places by hundreds of meters and, in some areas, by more than a kilometer.

Netanyahu has publicly said he wants to expand Israeli control over the strip further up to 70 percent.

Satellite imagery released on 21 July and reviewed by AP and Haaretz shows that the Israeli military has dug a 23-kilometer earthen trench along its new positions, cutting the devastated enclave in two.

In one stretch of southern Gaza, the trench sits more than a kilometer past the Yellow Line.

[…]

Via https://thecradle.co/articles/netanyahu-will-reject-us-demands-for-withdrawal-from-lebanon-gaza-syria-if-asked-report

Trump claims US in ‘very deep talks’ with Iran after Tehran denies negotiations

Posted on by
Reply

 

(Photo credit: Reuters/Kylie Cooper)

The Cradle

JUL 27, 2026

US President Donald Trump claimed on 27 July that “deep talks” with Iran were ongoing, while renewing the threat of “very strong military action” against the Islamic Republic in the event that the alleged negotiations “don’t work out.”

“We are in very deep talks with Iran. If they don’t work out, we will go back to very strong military action,” Trump told US outlet Axios in an interview.

In response to a question on how long the “negotiations” would last, Trump said, “Not much time. Either it goes fast or not at all.”

“All of the people that deal with Iran asked me: ‘Don’t fire,’” he went on to say, claiming mediators and regional states lobbied him to give diplomacy another chance. “Nothing gained, nothing lost,” he added.

The president also mentioned his upcoming meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Washington this week.

“I am going to talk to Bibi [Netanyahu] about the fact that if I weren’t president, Iran would have had nuclear weapons by now and Israel would have been destroyed,” he told the outlet.

Axios alleged that “current negotiations are focused on a new deal that would reopen the Strait of Hormuz and relaunch talks on a comprehensive nuclear deal.”

It stated that talks are being “conducted mainly between Iran and Oman,” but that Qatar, Pakistan, Egypt “and Trump’s envoys, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, are actively involved.”

The interview coincided with an AP report that said “progress” has been made in getting the two sides back to the negotiating table.

“Mediators led by Qatar and Pakistan are working to bridge the gap between Washington and Tehran to return to an interim ceasefire deal that had collapsed,” anonymous regional officials told AP.

Shortly before the AP report, drones of unknown origin – potentially belonging to Iraqi resistance factions – targeted energy infrastructure in Saudi Arabia. Aramco sites were targeted by the Yemen’s Ansarallah resistance movement on Monday as well, as announced by Sanaa.

Israel also said on Monday that its forces shot down two drones over the Jordan border.

Hours earlier, Iran completely rejected claims by Trump, US officials, and media reports that negotiations were underway.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei said that Iran and Oman were discussing joint management of the Strait of Hormuz, and that the talks had nothing to do with the US.

“We will not allow the US to determine the time of war and peace … We will defend ourselves for as long as necessary,” he said.

Over the weekend, Trump claimed Iran was taking alleged negotiations seriously following a pause of around two weeks of heavy US bombing against the Islamic Republic – to which Tehran responded with devastating strikes on Washington’s assets across the region.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio also recently claimed that Iran was “begging” for a deal.

Trump, Rubio, and other US officials say they have crippled the Islamic Republic’s military capabilities.

However, satellite imagery and reports revealed heavy casualties and significant losses inflicted by Tehran on US bases in Jordan, Kuwait, Bahrain, and elsewhere in the region in recent days.

Earlier this month, the Iranian army warned that it will leave “no trace” of the US military presence in West Asia if Trump carries out his renewed threats to destroy all of Iran’s bridges and power sites.

Trump has been making this threat since the start of the war months ago.

Axios had cited sources over the weekend as saying that the US “paused” the strikes on Iran due to their “limited effectiveness,” which military officials reportedly briefed Trump about.

As a result, the president delayed his plans for an even further and heavier escalation against Iran following the meetings with US military officials.

US intelligence assessments have recently concluded that continued military attacks against the Islamic Republic are “unlikely to move” Tehran or “soften its position” in any potential new round of negotiations, according to the Washington Post.

[…]

Via https://thecradle.co/articles/trump-claims-us-in-very-deep-talks-with-iran-after-tehran-denies-negotiations

Vaccine Amnesia: 75 Forgotten News Segments That Could Never Air Today

Posted on by
Reply

Covid Vaccines Targeting Omicron Should Be Standard, Panel Says - The ...

A Midwestern Doctor

Before the press was captured, vaccine injuries were openly covered on national TV. Now the dam of censorship is breaking, and we can finally confront the tragic history that keeps repeating.

Story at a Glance:

•Something about vaccines (e.g., their promise of a simple injection being sufficient to safely and effectively end all diseases) has always deeply appealed to the minds of government officials.

•That promise is often a lie. Over and over, unsafe and ineffective vaccines reach the market, and each time, the officials invested in them do everything they can to shield the vaccines from scrutiny and bury the red flags. The medical field has dutifully gone along.

•In earlier decades, the press was far less captured than it is now, and it occasionally aired real investigations into what was happening — segments that documented the suffering of the injured.

•Watched together, these reports show two things at once: how much more candid the media used to be, and how precisely the lies of that era match the lies we face now.

•I compiled this article in the hope of breaking the collective amnesia, now that the pharmaceutical industry’s grip on the media is finally slipping. Below are 75 news reports on the dangers of vaccination that have been almost entirely forgotten and would never be broadcast today.

A key theme I’ve tried to highlight in this publication is that the same medical catastrophes keep repeating (because those responsible are never held accountable), so by understanding what happened in the past, you can see and understand what is happening now and what will likely happen in the future.

For example, because vaccines are “risky but necessary,” the medical profession and government, again and again, concluded that they needed to tell the public all vaccines were “safe and effective” as the potential injuries a mass vaccination campaign would cause were outweighed by “necessary” benefit the vaccines could offer. As such, examples can be found again and again of severe injuries being systematically covered up for the “greater good” (e.g., the earliest documented example I know of this happened in 1874 with the smallpox vaccine) and health authorities concocting the same set of excuses we’ve seen since smallpox as to why those vaccines failed to prevent the diseases they were supposed to.

Since the risks of most vaccines (detailed here) far outweigh their benefits, a mass-vaccination paradigm can only be sustained by censoring the evidence of harm — and then citing that manufactured silence as proof of safety. Over the decades, more and more has been done to conceal those harms. For almost a century, severe neurological injuries after vaccination were routinely reported in the medical literature. Now vaccine injuries are censored, and it is nearly impossible to publish anything critical of vaccines in a “reputable” journal.

Likewise, despite the “science” that says vaccines are safe, it is nearly impossible to obtain the raw datasets that could actually answer the question — as Steve Kirsch showed the public throughout COVID-19 with his relentless, endlessly stonewalled quest to get that data. Likewise, VAERS, a public injury-reporting database only exists because the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act required a way for patients to bypass doctors refusing to report their injuries, and as such, ever since a law mandated its creation, everything possible has been done to undermine and discredit VAERS (except when the industry uses it as “proof” to prove vaccines are safe).

This is the inescapable problem at the heart of mass vaccination. When you take a product that is not completely safe and give it to an entire population, tens of millions of healthy people, most of whom were never at meaningful risk from the disease, even a small rate of serious harm guarantees that enormous numbers are injured or killed. Since there is no way around that arithmetic the authorities have chosen concealment every time, suppressing the data, reclassifying the injuries, and dismissing each casualty as a coincidence, because the alternative is admitting the paradigm itself produces the ever-increasing wave of chronic illness sweeping our society.

For a long time, the injuries were too numerous to fully hide, so the public kept reawakening to them and the mainstream media kept covering them. The industry’s solution came after it won liability protection in the 1986 vaccine law: spend whatever it took to censor the coverage and bury the injuries. But removing that check, the public finding out and objecting, removed the only real constraint on toxic vaccines reaching the market, and progressively more dangerous ones followed, until the COVID-19 catastrophe injured so many people that even a robust censorship apparatus couldn’t contain it. Numerous polls I’ve summarized in detail here demonstrate the scale of the vaccine injuries: depending on the survey, 7% to 13% of recipients reported a serious side effect, 24% to 28% say they know someone they believe died from the shot, and 46% to 55% believe the COVID vaccines have killed a significant number of people. Propaganda has its limits, and once numbers like those take hold, a new awareness of vaccine injury surfaces across the media ecosystem, occasionally on conservative networks, but mostly in the independent press.

[…]

Watch them in sequence and two patterns jump out. The same lines protected the schedule every time. We just need more research before we change anything, and we’ll do that research soon. Yet decades later, we still “need more research.” And the things vaccine-safety advocates warned about, and were denounced for warning about, kept coming true.

Mass Media Censorship

Actions like these were only possible because the corporate media suppressed dissent — even when large numbers of Americans believed the mandatory vaccines were injuring or killing their children, which is exactly the kind of story the press has a foundational duty to cover.

[…]

Because of this, many people in the media wanted to speak out against the vaccines, but effectively could not, and to my knowledge, other than a few Fox hosts lightly criticizing them, only two did. One, a recently hired reporter at a local station, on live television announced Fox was muzzling stories the public wanted to hear (and was promptly fired) after which she provided secret recordings to Project Veritas corroborating this censorship.

The other was Tucker Carlson, who was able to leverage both being the most popular news host in America and having a show which did not rely upon pharmaceutical funding to speak out against the vaccines without being fired. Nonetheless, this was still a huge risk for him and eventually, after airing this remarkable 4-19-23 segment (which took a lot of courage), at immense cost to Fox News, was immediately fired.

Once he left, he began talking openly about how much pharmaceutical money kept these stories off the air — and other former hosts corroborated him:

When I was on Fox News [circa 2007] and we talked about the possibility of vaccine injuries … They would RUN out to the set to tell you to shut that down.—Megyn Kelly

Likewise, Sharyl Attkisson (an acclaimed CBS investigative journalist) has extensively chronicled (e.g., in her 2020 book and even more so in her 2025 book) how in the early 2000s, the pharmaceutical industry, feeling the pressure from negative coverage of disastrous vaccination programs was creating for them, lobbied to prevent future negative coverage. Once this happened, it became impossible for her to air well produced segments which were critical of any vaccine initiative, and likewise, that in the post-2000s, stories on vaccine risks “disappeared” due to advertiser pressure.

However, things were not always this way. Rather, major networks used to air numerous scathing stories about vaccine disasters—and in many cases, the dangers they covered were so explicit by current journalistic standards that I frequently find sharing those (previously inconceivable) segments with people on the fence about vaccination opens their minds to the entire mess.

Mass Censorship

The Vietnam War was considered by many to be the event that broke the public’s trust in the Federal Government.

[…]

It is hard to overstate how much work went into hiding the horrors of war, and how effective it was — transforming war from something much of the public vehemently opposed into an abstraction they were largely apathetic about (the best documentary I’ve seen on how military propaganda evolved is Why We Fight).

The sanitizing of war parallels the medical censorship we now face. The same PR (public relations) firm that manufactured a heart-wrenching but entirely made up testimony that dragged the U.S. into the Gulf War has a long history of pharmaceutical work — and was contracted both to promote the COVID narrative and to eliminate “vaccine hesitancy.”1,2,3

Turning Points in Medical Censorship

Numerous medical catastrophes have happened which provoked widespread public outrage, and like the Vietnam War, those events brought the government to conclude it was imperative the public was prevented from becoming aware of future medical atrocities. Some of those events include:

The Polio Vaccine

In 1955, after an expedited approval, the government released a much-heralded vaccine, and two weeks later, children across America began turning up paralyzed in the exact limb where they’d received Salk’s polio shot.

After some investigation, it was discovered that:

•Only two of the five vaccine manufacturers had produced the same “safe” vaccines used in the clinical trials—which meant many of the vaccines the public got (which at the time were a new experimental technology) had never been tested in humans.

•At the urging of Salk, when the vaccine was mass produced, a different and less safe production process was used for the vaccine so the orders could be met.
[…]

•Bernice Eddy, an NIH employee, had immediately discovered this mass produced vaccine caused paralysis in monkeys.

•All of the paralyzing vaccines came from the same manufacturer (Cutter Laboratories).

•The (early) FDA delegated testing of the vaccine for safety to the vaccine manufacturers rather than doing so itself.

•There were many safety concerns with the testing of the Salk vaccine, but the professional publications chose to censor them and instead continually repeated the message that the vaccine was completely safe and effective.

The public was outraged, the government faced a public-relations crisis, and lawsuits dragged on against Cutter. In response, the federal government took direct control of every aspect of the vaccine program — switching from a neutral external auditor to a major stakeholder. As you’d expect, that conflict of interest gave the government every incentive to bury safety problems, and business as usual soon resumed.

[…]

The National Foundation told doctors, in a memo, that the vaccine was completely safe and the risk of paralysis was “zero.”

[…]

In 1960, five years after Cutter, Bernice Eddy determined that the polio vaccines were contaminated with a cancer-causing virus, SV-40, and were not fit for the public. Ordered to keep quiet so the public wouldn’t lose faith in the program, she published anyway — and was immediately demoted and stripped of her lab. Officials had known since 1959 that their vaccine caused cancer (a consequence of cutting costs with imported monkey kidneys) and were scrambling to address it while still promoting the shot. Only in 1963 did the government force manufacturers to stop growing the vaccine on contaminated kidneys — by which point between 40 and 98 million Americans had been infected, and a case can be made that SV-40 lingered in some vaccines until around 2000. This drove an increase in cancer that, until COVID, was unprecedented.

Around 1997, Canada’s Broadcasting Corporation aired a remarkable program on the recent findings that SV-40 was turning up in tumors, how it caused cancer, and the full history of how the polio vaccines became contaminated with it.

Many severe kidney diseases are also strongly associated with SV-40, and have likewise exploded since the polio vaccines. Because SV-40 was introduced into the population through the program (and transmits between humans and to fetuses) there has been a persistent reluctance to study its danger or admit it lingered in the supply for decades.

[…]

Via https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/vaccine-amnesia-75-forgotten-segments?publication_id=748806&post_id=208601881&isFreemail=true&r=4b9zas&triedRedirect=true

Sleepwalking into a Global Catastrophe: Why Trump’s War on Iran Threatens the Infrastructure That Keeps Billions Alive

Posted on by
Reply

Mike Adams

The Failure to See the Real Danger

Admittedly, I have failed to explain the stakes clearly enough. For months, I have written about fertilizer supply chains, the Haber-Bosch process, and the vulnerability of the Strait of Hormuz. But the gravity of this crisis has not sunk in for most people. Let me put it as plainly as I can: The global population of more than 8 billion people depends on a fragile web of natural gas, oil, and downstream chemistry that took 60+ years to build on this planet. If we lose 25 percent of these critical substances, we lose 25 percent of the population. That is 2 billion people. Here is why that math is inescapable.

As I documented in my article “The Haber-Bosch House of Cards,” the single chemical reaction that fixes nitrogen from the air into fertilizer is responsible for feeding roughly half of humanity [1]. That process requires vast quantities of natural gas. The Persian Gulf region, especially Qatar and Iran, supplies much of that gas. When the Trump administration launched its war on Iran in February 2026 and the Strait of Hormuz was effectively closed, the global fertilizer supply chain began to collapse. This is not a prediction of future famine. The famine is already baked in. But it could still get a whole lot worse depending on how things go from here.

The Hidden Infrastructure That Keeps Us Alive

Natural gas from Qatar and the Persian Gulf is not just for heating homes. It is the essential feedstock for nitrogenous fertilizers via the Haber-Bosch process. Without this gas, ammonia production stops. Without ammonia feedstock material for agricultural fertilizers, crops fail. Half of humanity is alive today only because of synthetic nitrogen fertilizer. As Sharon Astyk explains in her book “Depletion and Abundance,” our entire food system floats on a sea of oil and natural gas [2]. We have built a civilization that is utterly dependent on these energy-dense inputs.

Then there is sulfuric acid. It is produced as a byproduct of sour crude oil refining and is indispensable for manufacturing phosphate fertilizer. Without oil extraction, no sulfur, no phosphate – no food. The Persian Gulf supplies roughly one-third of globally traded fertilizer, and the Strait of Hormuz is the lifeline for both oil and gas shipments. As Lewis Dartnell notes in “Origins,” the narrow straits of Bab-el-Mandeb and Hormuz have been critical chokepoints for trade for millennia [3]. Today, they are the arteries of global food production. Sever them, and you sever the lifeline of billions.

How Trump’s Bombing Has Already Fractured the System

The war began with U.S. airstrikes on Iran after Trump claimed an imminent threat – a decision he later admitted was influenced by Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff, and Pete Hegseth [4]. Iran retaliated by closing the Strait of Hormuz, effectively cutting off 20 percent of the world’s oil and gas supply. Then came the Israeli strikes on Iran’s South Pars gas field. Iran responded by targeting QatarEnergy’s gas trained, achieving precision strikes. The damage is extensive. Two of QatarEnergy’s gas trains have been destroyed, with repairs estimated at 3 to 5 years – or a decade if Iran retaliates further and damages all 14 gas trains.

The loss of that gas means no nitrogen fertilizer, no affordable aluminum, no derived helium – the entire industrial chain is crippled. A detailed analysis by Craig Tindale, titled “Systemic Risk: A 12-Order Cascading Analysis of a Zero-Flow Strait of Hormuz Closure,” shows that the interruption of this one corridor can propagate outward into a general crisis of civilization [5]. Trump’s threats to target Iranian civilian infrastructure risk escalating the destruction to all Persian Gulf states. The system is not just under strain; it is breaking.

The Unavoidable Result: A Decade-Long Mass Die-Off

Without abundant fertilizer supplies, global food production collapses. For a decade, it will be physically impossible to feed all 8 billion people (only some of them will have access to food, but not all). As I warned in “The 10 Year Famine Is About to Be Unleashed,” the foundation of civilization is one vulnerable facility – the fertilizer supply chain [6]. In a worst-case scenario with extensive infrastructure destruction, the population could shrink from 8 billion to 4 billion or less. This is not hyperbole; it is mathematics. You cannot have half the food and keep all the people.

The coming migration tsunami will reshape the world, as I detailed in my article by that name [7]. Civil unrest, government collapses, and even cannibalism will follow. This is the scale of an asteroid impact, but man-made. The question is not whether mass death will occur, but how many billions will die before the system stabilizes at a lower population.

Conclusion: The Mad Emperor at the Controls

In summary, Trump is waging war on the entire human race. He and his advisers seemingly have no understanding of the ramifications of their actions. As I wrote in “The Coming Famine,” millions (at minimum) will starve because of a man-made catastrophe [8]. And if the escalation worsens, we could literally be facing the end of the world as we know it.

[…]

Via https://www.theburningplatform.com/2026/07/15/we-are-sleepwalking-into-a-global-catastrophe-why-trumps-war-on-iran-threatens-the-infrastructure-that-keeps-billions-alive/

 

The Diaries of Anthony Fauci

Posted on by
Reply

The Diaries of Anthony Fauci: 2020-2021

By

the full diaries of Anthony Fauci, the former head of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the leading voice of the Covid response during the most critical time in US history in the 21st century. The diaries are a hugely important documentation concerning a period otherwise shrouded in mystery. So far as we know, they are unredacted and from Fauci’s own pen, a day-by-day chronicle to compare against the public record.

Below we post Senator Paul’s rendering and a version from AI engine Claude.

[…]

Via https://brownstone.org/articles/the-diaries-of-anthony-fauci-2020-2021/