China to Ignore Trump Blockade: The Strait Remains Open to Us

president donald trump greets chinese president xi jinping before a bilateral meeting at the gimhae international airport terminal (54890669668) (1)

President Donald Trump greets Chinese President Xi Jinping before a bilateral meeting at the Gimhae International Airport terminal, Thursday, October 30, 2025, in Busan, South Korea. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Kyle Anzalone

April 13, 2026

China said it will not comply with the Strait of Hormuz blockade that President Donald Trump imposed on Monday. Beijing explained that it is negotiating with Tehran to transit the waterway and expects other countries not to meddle in its affairs.

Beijing is “monitoring the situation in the Middle East. Our ships are moving in and out of the waters of the Strait of Hormuz,” Chinese Defense Minister, Adm. Dong Jun, said after Trump announced the blockade. “We have trade and energy agreements with Iran. We will respect and honor them and expect others to not meddle in our affairs. Iran controls the Strait of Hormuz, and it is open for us.”

In response to a US and Israeli surprise attack on February 28, Tehran took control of the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has allowed only vessels from “friendly nations” to enter or exit the Persian Gulf and has imposed a toll. China is among the nations that have worked out deals with Iran to allow its ships to transit the Strait.

Iran says the Strait of Hormuz is now under Tehran’s control, and plans to change the toll to transit the waterway after the conflict ends.

Trump has threatened that the US will stop any ship that exits the Gulf after paying a toll to Tehran, setting up a potential confrontation with Beijing if the Navy attempts to seize a Chinese-flagged tanker.

Trump is scheduled to visit China next month to meet with President  Xi.  Earlier this week, the President threatened to place a 50% tariff on China if Beijing provides military support to Iran.

[…]

Via https://libertarianinstitute.org/news/china-to-ignore-trumps-blockade-the-strait-remains-open-to-us/

Epic battle of Bint Jbeil: Hezbollah fighters stand their ground

Hezbollah fighters Oct 2023 AP

Al Mayadeen English

Heavy confrontations are ongoing between Lebanese Resistance fighters and Israeli occupation forces on the outskirts of the old market area in the southern town of Bint Jbeil, according to Al Mayadeen’s correspondent in southern Lebanon.

The correspondent described the fighting as intense, stating that Resistance fighters in Bint Jbeil are engaged in close-quarters combat with elite Israeli units. The report portrayed the confrontation as a fierce and sustained battle amid ongoing military pressure.

Despite continued airstrikes, artillery shelling, and a siege of the area, Israeli forces have so far failed to achieve any significant breakthrough in Bint Jbeil, with field reports indicating that Israeli troops have not yet reached key positions inside the town, including the municipal stadium, a symbolic site from which martyr Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah declared that “Israel” is “frailer than a spider’s web” following the liberation of South Lebanon on May 25, 2000.

Rising casualties

Israeli media reported that the commander of Battalion 52 was seriously injured today in battles in Bint Jbeil, southern Lebanon.

Moreover, a very large number of wounded Israeli occupation soldiers are suffering from limb injuries from battles in Lebanon, along with other types of injuries.

Throughout the day, Israeli army helicopters have been landing at hospitals carrying wounded soldiers from the front in Lebanon, Israeli media reported.

Earlier today, Israeli media reported that 10 soldiers from Battalion 101 of the Paratroopers Brigade were wounded overnight during close-quarters combat with Islamic Resistance fighters within the town.

According to the same sources, three of the wounded soldiers are in critical condition. The casualties were evacuated to hospitals, with some transported urgently by military helicopters while others were transferred by ground.

Bint Jbeil, the capital of resistance in South Lebanon

Bint Jbeil, a key city in southern Lebanon near the Israeli border, holds significant strategic importance due to its location overlooking multiple access routes into the border region.

Bint Jbeil overlooks key routes linking Maroun al-Ras to Tebnine, forming a main north–south corridor between the border and inland areas. It also connects westward to Aitaroun and Rmeish along roads running parallel to the frontier.

To the northeast, it links into the wider road network toward Tyre, making it an important logistics and movement hub. Its elevated terrain also provides oversight of nearby cross-border approach routes, enhancing its strategic value.

Control of the town provides operational depth and influence over nearby villages, making it a recurring focal point in confrontations between Israeli forces and Lebanese resistance groups.

Strategic weight

Beyond its military relevance, Bint Jbeil carries strong symbolic weight. It has long been referred to as the “capital of the Resistance,” reflecting its role in shaping narratives of defiance and resilience.

Historically, Bint Jbeil’s association with resistance dates back to the French Mandate period. On June 11, 1936, protests erupted in the town during what became known as the tobacco revolt, after French forces opened fire on demonstrators. The incident marked an early chapter in the town’s legacy of organized opposition.

During the Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon from June 6, 1982, to May 24, 2000, Bint Jbeil became a central site of armed resistance activity. The town witnessed repeated operations against Israeli forces and their allies, reinforcing its position as a stronghold for resistance operations in the region.

Additionally, the town’s municipality stadium, a center of focus in the current battles, bore witness to martyr Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah’s May 25, 2000 speech, in which he declared “Israel” to be “frailer than a spider’s web” following the expulsion of Israeli forces from southern Lebanon and ending its occupation.

The town’s modern symbolic status was cemented during the July 2006 war, particularly in the Battle of Bint Jbeil, where intense fighting took place between Israeli troops and Hezbollah fighters. The confrontation became one of the most high-profile engagements of the war and was widely portrayed as a defining moment by both sides.

Today, Bint Jbeil remains both a strategic objective and a symbolic prize in any escalation along the Lebanon-“Israel” frontier. Its history, geography, and political significance continue to ensure its central role in ongoing tensions in the region.

Indonesia Agrees to Receive Oil, Gas Supplies From Russia – Indonesian Energy Ministry

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Indonesian counterpart Prabowo Subianto - Sputnik International, 1920, 14.04.2026

Sputnik

JAKARTA – Indonesia has secured agreements on the supply of crude oil, fuel and liquefied petroleum gas from Russia, Indonesian Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Bahlil Lahadalia said on Tuesday.

“We will be able to increase our crude oil reserves. In addition, we will have the opportunity to receive liquefied petroleum gas… The Russian side declared its readiness to support Indonesia’s energy security, including oil and gas supplies, as well as the development of storage systems,” the minister said following talks in Moscow.

The results of the negotiations send a positive signal to strengthen Indonesia’s energy sustainability “against the backdrop of an unstable global situation,” the minister said, noting that the partnership with Russia could “become an important option, given the scale of its energy production and experience in the oil and gas industry.”

[…]

Via https://sputnikglobe.com/20260414/indonesia-agrees-to-receive-oil-gas-supplies-from-russia—indonesian-energy-ministry-1123986579.html

Ships leave Iranian ports in Persian Gulf despite US ‘blockade’

File photo shows Iranian speedboats patrolling Persian Gulf waters.

RT

April 14, 2026

At least two ships sailing from Iranian ports crossed the Strait of Hormuz despite a blockade threat by the US military, maritime tracking reports have indicated.

The ships were among at least four Iran-linked vessels that used the route after Washington’s threat, according to maritime data provider Kpler.

The Liberia-flagged bulk carrier Christianna crossed after unloading 74,000 tons of corn at the Iranian port of Bandar Imam Khomeini, passing Iran’s Larak Island in the strait around 1600 GMT on April 13, Kpler data showed.

A second ship, the Comoros-flagged tanker Elpis, was near Larak Island around 1100 GMT and cleared the strait about 1600 GMT. It was loaded with 31,000 tons of methanol, having left the Iranian port of Bushehr on March 31, Kpler data showed.

The US Central Command (CENTCOM) had threatened the blockade would target “vessels of all nations entering or departing Iranian ports and coastal areas”.

A Chinese tanker, the Rich Starry, also crossed the Strait overnight via the Iranian-approved vetting route south of Larak Island.

Maritime analysts have cautioned that signals from ships in the region have been disrupted and manipulated, making precise tracking difficult.

Iran imposed restrictions on the passage of vessels in the Strait following the illegal US-Israeli war of aggression on February 28.

The administration of Donald Trump said over the weekend it would impose a blockade on Iranian ports in the Persian Gulf and Sea of Oman. The US military claimed the blockade took effect on Monday.

The IRGC warned that any military vessels approaching the Strait of Hormuz would breach a fragile ceasefire that halted 40 days of intense fighting last week. Iran’s central military command also warned of a broader regional response if Iranian ports come under attack.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/04/14/766870/Ships-leave-Iranian-ports-in-Persian-Gulf-despite-US-blockade-Data


Vance claims US has achieved Iran goals

Vance claims US has achieved Iran goals

RT

April 14, 2026

The US has achieved its objectives in Iran, Vice President J.D. Vance has claimed, adding Washington could begin winding down its military operation against the Islamic Republic.

In a Fox News interview on Monday, after US negotiators left talks in Pakistan without securing an agreement to end the conflict, Vance said Washington had made “a lot of progress” in the negotiations, adding that “the ball is in Iran’s court” on whether to move forward.

“I do think that we’re in a place where we’ve accomplished our objectives. We can start to wind this thing down. I’d much rather wind this thing down with a big successful negotiation,” he said.

According to Vance the talks at the weekend in Islamabad “did make some progress,” particularly on US demands for the removal of nuclear material from Iran and measures to prevent future uranium enrichment. “They moved in our direction,” he claimed.

He suggested that Iranian negotiators were “unable to cut a deal” without sign-off from other authorities and returned to Tehran to seek approval for US terms.

“Whether we have further conversations, whether we ultimately get to a deal, I really think the ball is in the Iranian court,” Vance said.

He added that if US “red lines” on Iran’s nuclear program are met, “then this can be a very, very good deal for both countries.”

The comments came hours after the US began blocking ships at Iranian ports in the Strait of Hormuz, a move President Donald Trump said was meant to force Tehran back to talks and reopen the vital oil artery, the disruption of which has sent energy prices skyrocketing.

Meanwhile, Tehran has signaled doubt, insisting that Washington should accept its terms or face a stalemate, Ebrahim Azizi, the head of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, told RT on Sunday. He added that the US needs a deal “more than we do,” and that many Iranians are unhappy that Tehran even entered into negotiations.

“When they need it, they should accept both the conditions and the prerequisites. If they don’t, we’ll do our work and go our own way. Nothing will change,” he insisted.

Tehran remains deeply skeptical of Washington’s intentions, even after ceasefire-related preconditions were discussed, Azizi said. “We simply do not trust them,” he added, questioning whether a country that “elevates arrogance and colonialism to a guiding principle” can be relied on to honor its commitments.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/638415-us-accomplish-iran-goal-vance/

Iran-Pakistan transit corridor begins operations with first export shipment

Iran-Pakistan transit corridor begins operations with first export shipment

Press TV

Trade activity through the newly launched Pakistan-Iran transit corridor has officially started, marked by the dispatch of the first export consignment from Pakistan.

Director Transit Trade Customs Sanaullah Abro told The Express Tribune that the maiden shipment — frozen meat — was sent to Tashkent, Uzbekistan, using refrigerated trucks.

He noted that under the new arrangement, goods from Pakistan will move through Gwadar, cross into Iran, and then proceed toward Central Asian destinations.

Abro said the launch of the corridor is expected to stimulate Pakistan’s economic growth and boost freight movement through the country’s ports.

According to the Directorate of Transit Trade Customs, the corridor operates under the TIR (Transports Internationaux Routiers) system.

To facilitate this, authorities have streamlined TIR procedures and activated major border points, including Taftan, Rimdan, Sost, and Gwadar.

Officials describe the Iran-Pakistan transit corridor as an important advancement for Pakistan’s trade and transit sectors, with the potential to expand exports and strengthen regional connectivity.

Sources added that the route will offer Pakistan a cost-efficient alternative to maritime trade, reducing transport times and significantly cutting logistics expenses.

At an inauguration ceremony, Abro and Director Transit Muhammad Rashid formally flagged off the first consignment.

Meanwhile, optimism is growing that Iran and Pakistan might revive their long-stalled gas and oil pipeline projects following recent peace talks between Iran and the United States.

Iran and Pakistan signed a commercial agreement in 2009 during the PPP government, and the gas pipeline was jointly inaugurated in 2013 by former Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and former Pakistani president Asif Ali Zardari.

While Iran has completed its part of the pipeline, Pakistan has yet to begin construction.

Officials say Iran is open to extending the gas sale agreement by 10 years, but Pakistan remains reluctant due to US sanctions and reduced domestic gas demand.

Pakistan has explored several alternative plans over the years, including an LNG pipeline from Gwadar with an additional 80-km stretch to the Iranian border.

A Chinese firm showed interest in the project, but international sanctions have continued to impede progress.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/04/13/766776/Iran-Pakistan-transit-corridor-begins-operations-with-first-export-shipment

With US Making Messes, China Making Moves

By John Leake and Shanaka Anslem Perera
April 13, 2026

JUST IN: While every camera in the world is pointed at the Serena Hotel in Islamabad today, Xi Jinping shook hands with KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing. The first high-level KMT-CCP leadership meeting in nearly a decade. Xi told her: “Compatriots on both sides of the strait are all Chinese, one family.” He added: “Taiwan independence is the chief culprit undermining peace.” Cheng called her six-day trip a “journey for peace” and invoked the 1992 Consensus.

This did not happen by accident. It happened today.

The Iran war pulled American military assets out of the Pacific. Carriers, Marines, THAAD, Patriots, all redeployed to the Middle East since February 28. Brookings explicitly identified this as “strategic space” for Beijing. China then used its leverage over Iran (1.5 million barrels per day, Tehran’s largest customer) to nudge Tehran toward the ceasefire. Trump confirmed: “I heard yes” when asked if China persuaded Iran. The ceasefire was the entrance fee for the May 14-15 Beijing summit. Today’s KMT meeting is the pre-summit positioning play.

The sequence is architectural. China vetoed the UN Hormuz resolution on April 7 (preserving Iran’s leverage and its own intermediary status). China nudged Iran toward the bilateral ceasefire the same day (building goodwill with Trump). China scheduled the Xi-Cheng meeting for April 10 (the day Islamabad talks begin, when US attention is maximally diverted). And the May summit sits five weeks away, where Taiwan language will be tested in a room where China arrives with three diplomatic receipts: we helped you get the ceasefire, we kept the KMT dialogue alive, and we are the only power that can deliver Iran.

Meanwhile, the KMT-controlled legislature has stalled Taiwan’s $40 billion special defense budget for asymmetric capabilities. The same party whose chairwoman is shaking Xi’s hand today is the party blocking the weapons purchases Washington needs Taiwan to make to sustain the First Island Chain deterrence strategy that underpins US containment of China. Bloomberg reported that Beijing will “use the sit down to argue that Taiwanese people are in favor of closer ties, sending a key signal to the US.” The New York Times said Xi is using the meeting “to cast Beijing as a peacemaker and squeeze the island’s president.”

Taiwan produces over 90 percent of the world’s most advanced semiconductors. TSMC commands 72 percent of the global foundry market. A full conflict over Taiwan would erase $10.6 trillion in global GDP in year one. This is not a sideshow. This is the main event wearing a mask.

Trump is a transactional president. He has already shown willingness to use allies as leverage (NATO “freeloaders,” Greenland, Panama Canal). China is betting that a president who just watched his NATO allies refuse to join the Iran war, who needs rare-earth supply chains for AI and defense, who wants a trade deal before midterms, will be receptive to a framing in which Taiwan is “handled” through dialogue rather than deterrence.

The Islamabad talks are about Iran. The Beijing handshake is about everything else. And the country that brokered the ceasefire, blocked the UN vote, moved its tankers freely through a closed strait, and met the opposition leader of America’s most strategically vital partner all did it in the same week.

The real negotiation is not at the Serena Hotel. It is already underway at the Great Hall of the People.

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-making-messes-china-making-moves/5921974

Ukraine Plans to Attack Russian Ships with Norwegian Support

At a time when the world is distracted by the Iran War, Ukraine and Norway are reportedly planning to attack Russian commercial ships. If Norway, which shares a nearly 200-kilometer border with Russia, implements the plan, it would make the Nordic country directly involved in the Ukrainian conflict and could therefore drag all of NATO into the conflict.

“The criminal Kiev regime, with the assistance of military specialists from the Norwegian Navy, is preparing to carry out terrorist attacks against Russian vessels traveling through the Barents and Norwegian Seas to and from the port of Murmansk,” TASS quoted a military-diplomatic source as saying on April 9.

As part of preparations for Ukrainian attacks on Russian commercial ships crossing the Barents and Norwegian Seas, one of the main maritime routes of the Arctic Circle, Norway has reportedly offered training and even its own territory for the military actions. Approximately 50 personnel of the 385th Separate Brigade of Special-Purpose Naval Unmanned Systems of the Ukrainian Navy are already in Norway, “practicing the use of unmanned underwater and surface systems in cold conditions,” according to the unnamed source.

It is recalled that Norway has already signaled its intention to provide financial and military aid to Ukraine in recent months, as the war-torn country has lost much support from the United States amid events in the Middle East. So, an attack by Ukraine with Norwegian help could clearly further escalate the conflict, introduce new nuances, and even bring new actors into this confrontation. The Norwegian government has already shown support for Ukraine in areas such as intelligence and even drone development, but until now, it had never directly engaged on the battlefield, whether to attack ports, ships, or troops.

The plan would also directly involve NATO in the conflict, since the military actions would originate from the territory of one of its members. If Norway opens its territory for use, for example, the border with Russia in the Arctic, it would lead to an escalation of the conflict and bring NATO directly into the war on a new battlefront.

Ukraine’s plan is an attempt by the Kiev regime to regain the spotlight lost to the Middle East and to attract the attention of its Western allies. Although the conflict in Ukraine has never stopped, nearly all the world’s attention has been on events in the Middle East since the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. Ukraine hopes that audacious attacks against Russia, particularly along a trade route, will bring the conflict in Eastern Europe back into the spotlight, attract public attention, and even recover some of the lost financial and military support.

Despite negotiations to end the conflict between Russia and Ukraine being virtually stalled in recent weeks, the discovery of the Ukrainian plan could affect peace talks and further strain relations between Brussels and Moscow. This could deepen existing distrust between the countries and hinder already fragile, obstacle-laden contacts. Reaching a peace agreement and a resolution is already difficult, and these reports could further worsen the situation.

It is worth noting that in recent decades, NATO itself broke a historic pledge made with Russia in 1991: not to advance eastward and to encircle the country’s borders. Instead, Moscow finds itself surrounded today by alliance members, with the exception of Belarus and Ukraine. Zelensky’s campaign to make Kiev a member state was one of the crucial factors in the outbreak of conflict in 2022.

The Ukrainian-Norwegian plan further exacerbates instability in the Arctic region, where tensions in Greenland have also escalated due to the actions and statements of US President Donald Trump. Given this, Norwegian support is not surprising, but the extent of the country’s interest in helping is notable.

Aid would likely be limited to unmanned vessels and would not involve military personnel. When citizens of a third country are attacked, the conflict will escalate. For this reason, like all the aid provided so far to Ukraine, it remains indirect.

The plan is not surprising, given the numerous terrorist attacks by Ukraine throughout the conflict, such as the Nord Stream 2 explosion and the failed attempt to blow up TurkStream, which connects Russian gas to Serbia and Hungary. This exemplifies not only Ukrainian practices but also collaboration among European allies.

In Norway’s case, the situation is further complicated by the country’s competition with Russia in the oil market and its even benefiting from anti-Russian sanctions. This motivation may stem from Oslo’s view of Russia as an energy rival.

Ahead of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group meeting in the Ramstein format, scheduled for April 15, Ukraine and Norway agreed on priority areas for defense cooperation, including strengthening air defense, developing unmanned systems, supporting innovative projects, and enhancing the capabilities of Ukraine’s Defense Forces. It is unlikely that Zelensky can draw NATO attention back to Ukraine, but it certainly appears that he has secured Norway’s support, an Arctic country opposed to Russia’s role in the region.

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/ukraine-plans-attack-russian-ships-norwegian-support/5922172

Ireland Backs Down as Truckers and Farmers Rock Nation

Army called in as fuel protests cripple Ireland - Yahoo News

NewsWatchmen.com

Ireland is facing one of its most dramatic protest waves in years as truckers, farmers, and workers continue nationwide demonstrations over soaring fuel prices and green energy policies. After days of blockades, port shutdowns, road disruptions, and clashes with police, the Irish government has now partially backed down—announcing major fuel tax cuts in an effort.

Ireland is facing one of its most dramatic protest waves in years as truckers, farmers, and workers continue nationwide demonstrations over soaring fuel prices and green energy policies.

After days of blockades, port shutdowns, road disruptions, and clashes with police, the Irish government has now partially backed down—announcing major fuel tax cuts in an effort to calm the unrest.

The protests have become a warning to governments across Europe pushing aggressive climate mandates while ordinary citizens struggle to survive.

Government Announces €500 Million Fuel Relief

Prime Minister Micheál Martin announced more than €500 million in fuel tax cuts after mass protests disrupted ports, highways, and fuel infrastructure.

The package reportedly includes:

  • Lower gasoline taxes
  • Lower diesel taxes
  • Delay of scheduled carbon tax hikes
  • Temporary emergency relief measures

The government insists the cuts were not a reward for protesters.

Many citizens disagree.

As we previously reported in Trump Orders Hormuz Blockade After Iran Talks Collapse, global energy shocks tied to Middle East conflict have intensified domestic crises across Europe.

Protesters Shut Down Key Infrastructure

Over the past week, demonstrators reportedly blockaded:

  • Major ports
  • Fuel depots
  • Ireland’s only oil refinery
  • Central streets in Dublin
  • Rural highways

Police and military units were deployed to clear some sites after fuel shortages worsened.

Despite the crackdown, protests continued to spread through social media coordination and grassroots organizing.

Why Citizens Are Angry

Many Irish workers say rising fuel costs are pushing farms, trucking companies, and small businesses toward collapse.

Critics blame both:

  • Global oil disruptions
  • Domestic green energy taxes
  • Carbon penalties on diesel
  • Restrictions on fossil fuel development

Protesters are demanding the government resume domestic energy exploration instead of what many call unrealistic decarbonization mandates.

Europe’s Green Agenda Under Pressure

Ireland is not alone.

Across Europe, farmers and workers have protested climate regulations, taxes, and cost-of-living pressures.

The Irish uprising highlights a growing political reality:

When elites push expensive energy transitions too quickly, working populations push back.

[…]

Strategic Implications

The Ireland protests reveal that energy policy is no longer just environmental policy.

It is political survival.

If governments continue prioritizing ideological targets over affordability, more uprisings may follow across Europe and beyond.

Leaders may discover that fuel prices can topple confidence faster than speeches can restore it.

[…]

Via https://newswatchmen.com/2026/04/13/ireland-backs-down-as-truckers-and-farmers-rock-nation/

US blockade of Iranian ports takes effect

US blockade of Iranian ports takes effect (PHOTOS, VIDEOS)

RT

The US naval blockade of Iranian ports has come into force, heightening fears over security and trade routes in the region and adding to market jitters after US‑Iran talks in Pakistan on Saturday ended without a deal. US Central Command has said that the measures apply to vessels calling at Iranian ports in the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman.

US President Donald Trump has launched a verbal attack on Pope Leo XIV, an outspoken critic of the war on Iran, calling the American-born pontiff “weak.”

In a Truth Social post, Trump – who initially hailed Leo’s election as a “great honor” – said the Pope is “terrible for Foreign Policy,” with the US leader adding that he does not “want a Pope who criticizes the President of the United States.” Speaking later aboard Air Force One, Trump doubled down, calling Leo “a liberal person” and saying: “I don’t think he’s doing a very good job… I’m not a big fan of Pope Leo.”

The remarks came after the pontiff intensified calls for peace and diplomacy in the Middle East. On Friday, Leo wrote that “God does not bless any conflict” and “no cause can justify the shedding of innocent blood.”

On Monday, the Pope reiterated his stance, saying he “will continue to speak out loudly against war.”

He added he was “not afraid” of Trump and refused to “get into a debate” with the US president. A senior Vatican official later dismissed Trump’s insults as “a declaration of impotence.”

The clash comes as Trump refused to rule out resuming “limited” strikes on Iran after ordering a naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. The move followed the collapse of 21-hour US-Iran talks in Pakistan at the weekend, which Tehran said broke down over “excessive” and “unreasonable” US demands. The US Department of War said enforcement of the blockade on all maritime traffic entering and exiting Iranian ports will begin at 10:00 AM ET (14:00 GMT) on April 13.

The announcement sent global oil prices back above $100 and prompted Iran to warn any hostile activity in the strait would be met with force, declaring no port in the Persian Gulf or the Sea of Oman would remain secure if its own ports are targeted.

  • Spanish Defense Minister Margarita Robles said Trump’s planned Hormuz blockade “makes no sense,” calling it part of a “downward spiral.”
  • China warned the blockade threatens global trade, stressing the strait must remain “safe, stable, and unimpeded.”
  • The UK said it will not join the blockade, adding Hormuz “must not be subject to tolling.”
  • Iran said it is weighing tolls on all vessels transiting Hormuz, not just oil shipments.
  • More than 32 million people could be pushed into poverty by the war’s fallout, the UN Development Program warned.

13 April 2026

18:06 GMT

At least two tankers turned away from the Strait of Hormuz shortly after the US began its blockade, according to ship-tracking site MarineTraffic. The data shows the 188-metre tanker Rich Starry reversed course within minutes of approaching the chokepoint, while another vessel, the 175-metre tanker Ostria, also turned back after nearing the strait.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/638259-us-iran-oil-blockade/