The Most Revolutionary Act

Uncensored updates on world events, economics, the environment and medicine

The Most Revolutionary Act

Why Is Media Ignoring Stunning New Trump-Epstein Allegations?

Donald Trump and future wife Melania pose with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. (Davidoff Studios / Getty Images)

Elie v. U.S. / October 30, 2026

In this week’s Elie v. U.S., our justice correspondent asks why the media is obsessing over Obama’s Cheesecake Factory joke while largely ignoring allegations of Trump’s sexual assaults.

[…]

The president of the United States of America has been accused of rape. Again. The president of the United States has been accused of rape in a report issued by the Democrats of the House Judiciary Committee, as part of their ongoing investigation of Donald Trump’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein. The president has been accused of raping two women, one when she was as young as 13, and sexually assaulting three more. They are among 11 women who provided evidence or testimony that Trump “abused, assaulted, and even raped numerous women alongside, and in coordination with, the most infamous sex trafficker in history.”

I have been made to understand that many people do not know about the Judiciary Comittee report—and the fact that five women have accused Trump of sexual assault while in or near the presence of noted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. I have been made to understand that this is because the mainstream media finds former president Barack Obama’s comments about the [checks notes] Cheesecake Factory more worthy of their attention than the current president’s abuse of multiple women.

If asked, mainstream media types would no doubt argue that the lack of coverage of these latest rape allegations stems from the fact that previous rape allegations failed to “move the needle.” Trump’s sexual misconduct (both alleged and litigated) is “baked in” to people’s understanding of the man. People either won’t believe the charges or won’t care—or else they do believe the women and do care and vote accordingly—but everybody knows what he’s been accused of, generally speaking at least.

I find this line of argument unadulterated bollocks that reveals the deep failure of our mainstream media. It is news when the president is credibly accused of rape. It is important news. While I, too, don’t think these latest sexual assault accusations will materially change the national conversation about Trump or his presidency, that is not an excuse for ignoring, downplaying, or skipping over brutal allegations that he repeatedly assaulted women, including minors.

Journalists cannot decide what other people think is important. Their job is to illuminate what they think is in the public interest. I think reporting on rape allegations levied against the president of the United States is in the public interest. And since I think that, it really doesn’t matter if the public agrees with me.

With that in mind, I, unlike people who work for Bari Weiss, read the Judiciary report. Here are some of the allegations:

  • Beatrice Keul, a former Miss Switzerland, accuses Trump of raping her at the Plaza Hotel in November 1993. She describes the rape as “brutal.”
  • Stacey Williams says that Trump groped her at Trump Tower while standing next to Jeffrey Epstein.
  • Jill Harth claims that Trump forcibly kissed her at Mar-a-Lago; her allegations are corroborated by her former spouse. Harth also claims that Trump assaulted another woman, Lauren Petrella.
  • “Katie Johnson,” not her real name, claims that Trump and Epstein repeatedly raped her at Epstein’s New York residence in 1994, when she was just 13.
  • An unnamed Jane Doe claims Trump sexually assaulted her in the 1980s, when she was 13. She says Trump forcibly moved her head to his exposed penis and hit her when she resisted his assault. She reported these allegations to the FBI.

[…]

Via https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/newsletter-why-is-the-media-ignoring-the-stunning-new-trump-epstein-allegations/

Questioning Your Doctor Now Considered Psychological Problem

US War Department seeks emergency clearance for sublingual ketamine wafers to treat battlefield casualties

The Cradle

According to a report by Politico, the US War Department is fast-tracking the procurement of sublingual ketamine wafers for battlefield trauma management, pushing for emergency regulatory clearance to bypass standard Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval cycles.

The move follows a $41 million sole-source development contract awarded earlier this year to Singapore-based iX Biopharma to produce “Wafermine”—a fast-dissolving sublingual wafer designed to deliver high-potency ketamine directly into the bloodstream through the oral mucous membrane.

The rapid push toward emergency authorization stems from a September declaration by War Secretary Pete Hegseth, who formally cited a heightened risk of CBRN (chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear) attacks and high-intensity combat scenarios capable of causing mass casualty events.

Under the federal declaration, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. determined that emergency conditions exist to justify the deployment of unapproved, specialized analgesics to prevent severe shock and hemodynamic instability among wounded combat personnel.

The Pentagon’s shift toward sublingual ketamine underscores an evolving tactical medicine strategy that prioritizes rapid, non-opioid pain management in extreme combat environments where intravenous administration is impractical.

However, the program faces immediate logistical and regulatory hurdles following reports that iX Biopharma’s primary domestic manufacturing partner currently lacks the required state licensing in Nevada to operate, drawing increased scrutiny from federal lawmakers over the expedited sole-source procurement process.

Via https://t.me/thecradlemedia/70279

IRGC dismantles foreign intelligence cell in western Iran, seizes arms and satellite equipment

Ministry of Intelligence: Enemy mercenary cells dismantled in several ...
The Cradle

31 Oct 2026

Iranian security forces have dismantled a two-member espionage cell linked to foreign intelligence services in the western province of Kermanshah, according to Mehr News Agency.

The targeted intelligence operation was executed by units of the “Ansar al-Rasul” Commando Brigade of the IRGC Ground Forces in the city of Javanrud, successfully neutralizing the network before it could execute planned subversion operations.

During the raids, IRGC commandos seized a substantial cache of military hardware and specialized communications equipment, including ten Starlink satellite internet terminals, ten Kalashnikov assault rifles, and 5,000 rounds of live ammunition.

Iranian defense officials confirmed that the suspects had been recruited through encrypted social media platforms and messaging applications to build local operational networks and facilitate covert communications channels bypassing state infrastructure.

The dismantling of the Kermanshah cell comes amid a wider security crackdown across Iran’s border provinces, where state security apparatuses have intensified counter-espionage operations against US and Israeli-linked intelligence networks.

Via https://t.me/thecradlemedia/70298

UAE Secretly Helping Ansarallah Fight Saudi Arabia in Yemen

A fighter loyal to Yemen’s Saud-backed internationally-recognized government fires a turret from the back of a pickup truck at a position along the frontlines against Ansarallah around Mount al-Midan in Yemen’s western Taiz province on October 26, 2026. Photo by Ahmad AL-BASHA / AFP via Getty Images.

In an extraordinary move, the UAE has been covertly sharing targeting assistance with the Iranian-aligned Ansarallah in its conflict against Saudi-backed forces inside Yemen.

The United Arab Emirates, a key American and Israeli ally in the Gulf, has been quietly assisting Ansarallah in its conflict against Saudi-backed forces inside Yemen, four sources with knowledge of the situation told Drop Site News.

Specifically, various UAE-aligned Yemeni forces have been providing targeting assistance to Ansarallah in their battle against Saudi-backed government forces in Yemen while Abu Dhabi has looked the other way, the sources said.

According to two sources with knowledge of the covert arrangement, the UAE’s assistance has also included direct sharing of intelligence by the UAE itself to Ansarallah for the purpose of targeting Saudi-backed forces.

A Yemeni source familiar with the Ansarallah backchannel confirmed that “the UAE has passed a significant amount of intelligence to the Sana’a-based government; the line of communication between the two sides remains open.” The Yemeni source told Drop Site that Ansarallah “established their own channels of communication internally with military commanders” who remain loyal to the UAE. The sources required anonymity as they are not authorized to speak publicly about the arrangement.

That the UAE is directly aiding one of its chief regional opponents is extraordinary. The UAE and Ansarallah are fierce ideological enemies with geopolitical goals that are in direct opposition to one another. The UAE is a close ally of Israel and the United States while Ansarallah is a close ally of Iran. However, when it comes to Yemen, their interests have come to overlap to some extent, producing a classic enemy-of-my enemy situation. The UAE was sidelined in Yemen earlier this year by Saudi Arabia, and stands to regain a strategic foothold in Yemen in the current conflict.

The assistance to Ansarallah from the UAE, some of the sources said, does not include help with intelligence and targeting inside Saudi Arabia, but is limited to help with targeting and intelligence inside Yemen. Ansarallah’s attacks on Saudi Arabia included strikes on Saudi’s main airport, one of which killed 12 people and wounded more than 300 others—and led to the cancellation of the Future Investment Initiative conference, otherwise known as the “Davos in the Desert.”

Recently, according to one source, a senior American official warned the Emirates that the U.S. had learned of the covert assistance being provided and urged that it be ended. Sources indicated the intelligence assistance was ongoing. UAE Ambassador to the U.S. Yousef Al Otaiba did not respond to requests for comment.

Mohammed al-Bukhaiti, a senior Ansarallah official, denied that the UAE was assisting Ansarallah but insisted the Emirates were committed to neutrality. “The UAE has not provided any form of support to Yemen—neither against Saudi Arabia nor against its proxies within Yemen,” he told Drop Site. “According to our information, the UAE remains committed to neutrality and has refused to become re-involved in the aggression against Yemen alongside Saudi Arabia, despite persistent efforts by [Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed] bin Salman to persuade it to join.”

Last month, the Iran-backed Ansarallah, also known as the Houthis, launched a blitz to the Red Sea coast that stunned the region, routed Saudi-backed forces, and left Ansarallah in control of the Bab Al-Mandab Strait, one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes and an important alternative to the blockaded Strait of Hormuz. Saudi efforts to regain territory have largely been repelled. Since then, Saudi Arabia has increasingly bombed Sana’a and other Ansarallah-controlled areas, while Ansarallah have conducted multiple strikes on Saudi Arabia.

Beginning in 2015, the Emirates were allied with Saudi Arabia as part of a coalition backing the Yemeni government, after Ansarallah swept south from its stronghold in the northern highlands and took over Sana’a in 2014. The Yemeni government is commonly referred to as the internationally recognized government, or IRG, and it remains largely based in Riyadh. But, early in the conflict, the UAE’s aims and ambitions were at odds with the Saudis, causing division in the anti-Ansarallah side. In December of last year, that friction resulted in clashes between UAE-backed forces and Saudi-backed military units in the south and the UAE was effectively expelled from Yemen by force.

Earlier this month, The Guardian reported that the UAE was re-entering the Yemeni conflict on the side of Saudi Arabia by agreeing to resume some payments to some of the forces it had backed.

That backing would most likely come through supporting the Giants “Al Amaliqah” Brigades, a predominantly Salafi militia ideologically opposed to the Houthis with an estimated 20,000 to 30,000 largely southern fighters. The Southern Giants are currently battling for control of the Kahboub mountain range overlooking the Bab al-Mandab.

This potential support has not been reflected on the battlefield, the Yemeni source said. Many commanders within the Giants Brigades have deceived the Saudi-backed forces, the source said, repeatedly abandoning their positions without any engagement or confrontation.

The source also told Drop Site that military unit commanders affiliated with the UAE-backed Southern Transitional Council (STC) have refrained from fighting the Houthis, effectively stalling battlefronts—particularly in the southern governorates of Al-Dhale, and Lahj—bordering Taiz governorate, and frequently withdraw from their positions.

A UAE-based senior official categorically stated to Drop Site that “the STC has no channels of communication with the Houthis” and denied that STC were refusing to fight Ansarallah in the south. “The STC has publicly and consistently maintained that the Southern Armed Forces will not participate in military operations in the North,” Amr al-Beidh, special representative of the president of the STC, told Drop Site. “This should not be confused with an unwillingness to confront the Houthis. Quite the opposite. Any Houthi advance towards the South will be met with resistance.”

“It is important to distinguish between our policy of not engaging in military operations in the north and our firm commitment to defending the South against the Houthis,” he added.

The White House and a spokesperson for the Saudi-led coalition did not respond to requests for comment.

More than 250,000 people have been displaced by the escalating violence since August 1, according to the International Organization for Migration. Almost half of those have fled Taiz governorate, which encompasses some of Yemen’s highest mountains and a large stretch of the western Red Sea coastal plain approaching the Bab al-Mandab, including the strategic port of Mokha. Aid agencies cannot reach more than 600,000 people in Taiz—where the capital city is currently besieged by Ansarallah—who depend on humanitarian assistance, according to the UN’s World Food Program (WFP), including more than 200,000 women and children.

A Web of War

The UAE is Israel’s closest ally in the Gulf, and was previously allied with Saudi Arabia in its war against Ansarallah in Yemen. But the UAE’s interests in Yemen diverge from both Israel’s and Saudi Arabia’s.

As early as 2015 it became apparent that the Emirates’ priority in Yemen was to counter the perceived threat from the Muslim Brotherhood over and above the conflict with Ansarallah. The Islah Party—Yemen’s political Islamist party that includes factions of the Muslim Brotherhood—emerged as the UAE’s primary target despite their role within the IRG.

In 2015, UAE forces and Yemeni fighters it trained and funded pushed Houthi forces—that at the time included loyalists of Yemen’s former president Ali Abdullah Saleh—out of the southern city of Aden. The UAE went on to consolidate its gains, establishing an array of fighting groups that they both funded and directed.

The STC represented the aspiration for renewed southern independence and animosity in the region toward being ruled by northern elites since the unification of Yemen in 1990. Unification resulted in land theft and the economic benefits of the south’s natural resources being captured by Saleh and his cronies. Islah was also viewed by southerners as part of this exploitative northern rule.

The UAE capitalized on this animosity and desire for self-determination, supporting the creation in May 2017 of the separatist Southern Transitional Council (STC) led by Aidarous al-Zubaidi. Islah was a common enemy.

Between 2015 and 2018 at least 160 assassinations were carried out in southern Yemen. The majority of those assassinated were members of Islah, many of them were imams, creating a climate of fear and paranoia in Aden and across the south. Widely held suspicion that the UAE was behind the deaths was confirmed in 2018 when American mercenaries told a BuzzFeed journalist (and, later, the BBC) that they had carried out assassinations on behalf of the UAE and trained Yemeni forces to carry on the killings.

Ansaf Ali Mayo, an Islah parliamentarian, survived an attempt on his life by the American assassins. Earlier this year he filed a lawsuit against the two former U.S. special forces operators in a federal court in San Diego along with the Israeli-Hungarian founder of the private security firm Spear Operations Group that hired them.

The UAE’s hiring of foreign mercenaries didn’t stop at U.S. veterans. Thousands of Sudanese Rapid Support Force (RSF) were brought in by the UAE between 2015 and 2018 to help fight Ansarallah as the UAE-backed forces made gains up Yemen’s western Red Sea coast into the governorate of Hodeidah, home to Yemen’s second largest port and controlled by Ansarallah.

The rift between UAE-backed forces and those of the Saudi-backed IRG has not only considerably weakened efforts against the Houthis but, on several occasions over the past decade, spilled into direct infighting.

In August 2019, UAE fighter jets carried out up to 24 airstrikes against IRG and Islah-aligned government military units and positions in Aden, Abyan, and Marib in support of the STC as the competing factions vied for control. Al-Zubaidi was summoned to the Saudi capital and in November 2019, an agreement was signed between the Saudi-backed IRG and the STC.

The power-sharing deal, known as the Riyadh Agreement, should have meant an integration of STC forces into the IRG military in exchange for southern representation in a unity government. But implementation stalled.

The situation came to a head in December 2025 when STC forces swept east from their stronghold in Aden to take two large governorates bordering Saudi Arabia and Oman. Saudi Arabia responded by launching airstrikes targeting a large shipment of Emirati military equipment at the port of Mukalla and giving the UAE 24 hours to leave and end its “military or financial support to any party within Yemen.” The UAE heeded the warnings and STC forces were quickly routed by Yemeni government military units backed by Saudi air cover.

“Saudi Arabia was the one that forced the UAE out of the coalition waging war on Yemen in a humiliating manner, effectively shooting itself in the foot,” said al-Bukhaiti. “Given this experience, it is only natural that the UAE would refuse to rejoin the Saudi-led coalition in its aggression against Yemen [Ansarallah], despite pressure from Saudi Arabia, the United States, and Israel, particularly after Yemen demonstrated its remarkable ability to defend itself and impose a principle of blockade for blockade and escalation for escalation.”

Since this latest fissure between Saudi Arabia and the UAE in Yemen, not all of the formerly UAE-aligned forces have been fully integrated into the IRG military and security apparatus, partially because this process was disrupted due to the renewed fighting with Ansarallah. STC loyalists remain in the mountains of Al Dhale, the homeland of Al-Zubaidi who fled to the UAE in January. For months after the Saudi pushback in December 2025, surveillance drones were a constant presence and Saudi airstrikes killed at least six civilians in Al Dhale in January.

[…]

Via https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/uae-yemen-ansarallah-houthis-saudi-arabia-covert

Uyghur Genocide Psy-Op Exposed

On June 29, 2020, the CIA-linked Jamestown Foundation—which was set up with the help of former CIA Director William Casey (1981-1987) and appointed ex-CIA Director James Woolsey (1993-1995) as Vice Chairman and former CIA Director Michael Hayden (2006-2009) to its board[1]—published a “research report” by Adrian Zenz, which falsely accused the Chinese government of committing “genocide” against ethnic minorities in Xinjiang.

After the release of the report, the media became filled with sensationalistic articles and Uyghur exiles were given platforms in major universities to promote the genocide claim. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, former Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom and now National Endowment for Democracy (NED) Board members Sam Brownback, Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) and House Representative Jim McGovern (D-MA) also began whipping up the “genocide” accusation and lobbying the Trump administration for hard-line anti-China policies.

In December 2021, President Joe Biden signed legislation—which passed both houses of Congress, with only Thomas Massie (R-KY) dissenting—banning imports from China’s Xinjiang region as part of an attempt to punish the Chinese government for its alleged genocide of Uyghurs and other ethnic minorities. Three years later, Ritchie Torres (D-NY) inserted a Uyghur Review Act into the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) requiring the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) to submit to Congress a report on the Uyghur genocide, with Torres alleging that more than one million Uyghur had been killed.[2]

[…]

Via https://covertactionmagazine.com/2026/10/26/uyghur-genocide-psy-op-exposed/

As the AI Bubble Threatens to Burst, We Must Prepare to Fight a Big Tech Bailout

By Alexis Goldstein

This article was originally published by Truthout

As firms like CoreWeave and NVIDIA start to wobble, let’s demand that the public won’t be the one left holding the bag.

AI data centers are unpopular for good reason: they drive up utility costs for communities, crowd out everything from schools to family farms, and they’re bad for our health. But these data centers are also a financial crisis in slow motion.

The AI ecosystem is built on mountains of debt taken on not only by tech firms like Meta (which borrowed a record-breaking $25 billion in late 2025 to fund the building of data centers), but also by the companies that lease data center space to the Big Tech firms. Many of these firms have spent far more than they have come close to earning in profits: One estimate puts tech industry spending to build data centers at $1.9 trillion, but less than half of that money has been made in revenue.

The financial markets are taking notice.

There’s been significant turmoil in the tech sector over the past month — and at one critical company in particular: CoreWeave.

CoreWeave used to be a Bitcoin mining firm called Atlantic Crypto, but it started to pivot to AI in 2019. CoreWeave leases space to Big Tech firms at data centers they build and maintain. CoreWeave has paid for most of its data centers by borrowing: it currently owes more than $51 billion to investors, including two of the most infamous financial firms: Magnetar and Blackstone, as documented by journalist Elizabeth Lopatto at The Verge.

CoreWeave’s troubles have been piling up: its stock lost a quarter of its value — a 25 percent drop — last week, then dropped another 10 percent on October 22. Bond investors are demanding more money if they’re going to take on the risk of buying CoreWeave debt, a sign the markets are worried about CoreWeave going bust. Investors used to be content to be paid 9.75 percent a year to loan CoreWeave money until 2031; now bond market investors won’t take that risk without being paid almost 15 percent in annual interest.

But perhaps the worst bit of news for CoreWeave is in the market’s falling confidence in its ability to survive, as measured by the cost of an instrument known as the credit default swap, which is essentially a bet that a company is going to go bankrupt (it’s also described as insurance against that company’s bankruptcy). The cost of buying a five-year-long credit default swap for CoreWeave has increased over 164 percent in the past year.

It’s not just CoreWeave facing trouble. One of the most significant companies in the AI ecosystem is NVIDIA, the graphics card maker, which, on September 28, spent $150 billion to buy back shares of its own stock from the overall market.

It was a record-breaking stock buyback — no other company in history had ever purchased that much of its own stock. One reason companies buy back their own stock is to artificially boost the stock price. Often the CEO’s compensation is tied to the price of the stock, and so the company purchases its own stock back to drive up the price, thus guaranteeing the CEO higher compensation.

The market sometimes perceives a stock buyback as a sign of confidence, reinforcing the idea that the company itself is underpriced. But in the case of NVIDIA, it seemed to be an indication that there’s nowhere higher to go, and the only way to raise the price of NVIDIA stock, which has been on a record tear, is to artificially boost it. Financial journalists have questioned NVIDIA’s ability to keep rocketing upward since late 2025. NVIDIA stock is down around 5 percent since this latest buyback.

AI has been sold to the general public as everything from a panacea to a danger to humanity to a roaring bull market, but it’s starting to look more like financial mania.

In late 2025, OpenAI CFO Sarah Friar caused a stir when she suggested the government should backstop AI firms like hers. Astra Taylor and Naomi Klein warned about the potential for an AI bailout in their new book End Times Fascism: And the Fight for the Living World, and propose a new disarmament movement.

To disarm the big tech bomb, including AI, the public needs to be on high alert — as AI firms start to visibly wobble, we need clear demands and firm commitments from our leaders that if it all comes crashing down, the public won’t be the one left holding the bag.

Via https://scheerpost.com/2026/10/28/as-the-ai-bubble-threatens-to-burst-we-must-prepare-to-fight-a-big-tech-bailout/

Erin Brockovich: 4,000 People Asked Me To Investigate Data Centers; Here’s What I Found

erin brockovichImage by Akela999 from Pixabay

Erin launched Brockovich Data Center Reporting—which received nearly 4,000 submissions in its first month alone. She sits down with Jon to discuss everything she’s learned, what the industry gets wrong about the backlash, and whether there’s a way to build what we need without screwing over the people who have to live with it.

SOURCE

Via https://envirowatchnz.com/2026/10/31/erin-brockovich-4000-people-asked-me-to-investigate-data-centers-heres-what-i-found/

‘Ports for peace’: Dockworkers across five continents stage mass strike against arms shipments

(Photo credit: Matteo Ciambelli/Reuters)

The Cradle

OCT 30, 2026

Unions have adopted a declaration calling for an end to Israel’s genocide in Gaza and the recognition of Palestinian statehood

Dockworkers across five continents launched coordinated strikes on 30 October to disrupt arms shipments bound for “war zones” from transiting civilian ports, Italy’s Unione Sindacale di Base (USB) announced.

The coalition consists of more than 25 unions, with strikes, cargo stoppages, rallies, and protests planned at 113 ports across 22 countries and regions under the banner “Ports For Peace. Jobs With Dignity.”

The unions adopted a joint declaration in Istanbul in May demanding an immediate end to Israel’s genocide of the Palestinian people, and international recognition of an independent Palestinian state on the 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital.

The declaration also rejects the use of any port to ship arms, ammunition, military equipment, or troops to war zones.

The scale of the action differs between ports. Unions in France, Italy, Greece, Turkiye, and India have called 24-hour strikes, while workers in Morocco and Cyprus will suspend cargo handling for up to two hours, and other ports will hold rallies and pickets without halting operations.

French port unions expect their strike to halt roughly 95 percent of activity at the country’s ports.

Organizers say the unions involved from the start represent ports that handle about 40 percent of Mediterranean container traffic, and that a single day of action could disrupt or halt the movement of around 40,000 containers.

The Istanbul Declaration further calls for an end to the US-Israeli wars of aggression across West Asia and against Iran, and refuses to let ports serve as military bases for NATO, the US, or the EU, or as instruments of shipowners and monopoly interests.

The joint declaration also affirms the right of all peoples to resist occupation and determine their own future, and expresses solidarity with Cuba, Venezuela, and Sudan.

Each union is choosing its own form of action based on national conditions, but united by what the signatories called a shared commitment to “prevent the loading of death and destruction.”

Dock workers across the Mediterranean, Europe, and North Africa have been organizing against arms shipments to Israel since the start of Israel’s genocide of Palestinians in Gaza in October 2023.
Unions and port-worker collectives in France, Italy, Greece, Morocco, Spain, and Turkiye began refusing to handle, load, or transit weapons, ammunition, and military components.

Their actions have included blocking vessels, boycotting ships carrying US military equipment, halting Israel-bound military cargo, and coordinating strikes across Mediterranean ports

Dock workers have also threatened wider blockades and general strikes to defend Gaza-bound aid flotillas in their many missions to break the Israeli siege of the enclave, and have pressed port authorities and shipping firms to disclose cargo and routes kept hidden from public view.

Via https://thecradle.co/articles/ports-for-peace-dockworkers-across-five-continents-stage-mass-strike-against-arms-shipments

Spotlight on Canada’s Vaccine Injured at the Allison Inquiry

Allison Inquiry FI
Photo Credit – © Canva Pro Content License

By Miss Information
30 October 2026

It is a source of relief to those of us working with the vaccine injured, and advocating for the preservation of medical ethics against the corporate takeover of health systems, to see well-organised pushbacks elsewhere. Canada, home of the Freedom Truckers who inspired our own Freedom Convoy and parliament occupation in 2022, has acknowledged the suffering of the covid vaccine injured and bereaved in an official parliamentary hearing, The Allison Inquiry.

Dean Allison is the federal Member of Parliament representing the Niagara West electorate of Ontario in the Canadian House of Commons. Based in Grimsby, on the south-western shore of Lake Ontario, Allison has a background in private business and community service. Elected to the House of Commons in June 2004, he has retained his seat for the past 22 years.

Over half of the entire population of Canada is reported to have received at least one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine. Health Canada’s Covid-19 safety reports document over 59,000 adverse events including 11,000 classified as serious.

It would seem Canada’s under-reporting is much worse even than ours. Doctors and patients have reported extreme difficulty in filing reports, and a consistent pattern by authorities allegedly tasked to investigate reports, of refusing to examine the possibility of safety signals. Combined with a general lack of public awareness to the connection between health problems and the injectable products, this means that the real numbers are likely to be higher by an order of magnitude.

Until last month the only inquiry into the experiences of Canadian citizens relating to the covid response had been the National Citizens Inquiry, launched in 2023 and driven entirely by citizen funding and leadership. Overseen by legal counsel Shawn Buckley, the NCI is now expanding into other related issues.

Allison describes hearing frequently from constituents about the impact of the covid response upon their lives. Sick, injured and disabled people report serious gaslighting from health professionals tasked with diagnosing and treating them, and broad censorship of any attempts to speak about their experiences. These stories impelled him to launch the non-partisan Allison Inquiry in collaboration with Shawn Buckley to “create a neutral forum for Canadians to share their personal experiences of injuries to themselves, or to others, from the Covid-19 vaccine(s).“

The inquiry was held from 8 September until 11 September 2026 at the Wellington Building on Parliament Hill in Ottawa. Over 1,400 witness applications were received from vaccine injured Canadians, with more continuing to come forward. Their experiences will be documented in the final report, and each applicant’s name was read out during breaks in proceedings, in order to be included in the official record.

Forty five injured or bereaved citizens were selected to appear in person at the live event, to describe their experiences and the impact their injury and/or loss has had on their lives. Eighteen expert witnesses with backgrounds in medicine, law, journalism, science and data analysis also provided evidence. Video of each full day, and separate footage of each individual testimony, with a short written summary of each, can be found at this link.

In his opening statement on 8 September 2026, Shawn Buckley revealed the fears expressed by many witnesses, some of whom withdrew testimony due to the stigma they face in a fractured society. “One person was told by a family member, “If I testify, I will never see my grandchildren again.” Another injured witness, who had already lost her mother and a sibling, feared losing the last family member she had left if she testified“. Others were unable to attend due to medical treatment commitments.

Open invitations were sent to all Members of Parliament and Senators, and all media outlets. On Day 2 it was reported that of the 20 seats reserved for the approximately 340 sitting MPs, only two were used. Allison reported that when the Inquiry was first planned, he could not herald any support from his parliamentary peers, but that ultimately about ten MPs attended some of the sessions. Unfortunately all represented the Conservative party, showing the political divide that remains on what should be, and is, a non-partisan issue.

Nevertheless, Allison has described this as a move in the right direction. He says that now MPs are contacting him asking for support to convene local town halls to hear from their constituents. As public perception of what has happened evolves, the conviction of political representatives on all sides of politics is destined to follow. New Zealand seems to be seeing some evolution in the actions of some smaller parties outside parliament and at least one Member of Parliament, current Foreign Minister, Winston Peters.

Similarly, whilst multiple independent media outlets (eg Press for Truth, Rebel News, The Highwire and Wiretap Media) attended and / or reported on the inquiry, legacy media remained absent. Headquarters of Canada’s national broadcaster, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) are a few steps away from the Wellington Building, yet not a single CBC journalist attended.

The absence of the CBC appears to have been eloquently explained by former CBC journalist Rodney Palmer in his presentation to the Allison Inquiry on the difference between “public broadcasters” and “state broadcasters”. New Zealand experienced a similar journalistic fate thanks to the $55m Public Journalism Fund which helped to uphold our “single source of truth“.

The focus of the Allison Inquiry was to give a voice to the vaccine injured, who have been marginalised, ignored, gaslit and smeared as “anti vaxxers” despite taking the products. This is a global phenomenon resulting from a calculated propaganda and censorship campaign.

The Canadian experience reflects that which is taking place globally including here in New Zealand. Whilst the NZ establishment claims to have addressed our covid response through the Royal Commission of Inquiry, human rights breaches and the associated physical harms continue to be ignored and downplayed.

Our health system plays a pivotal role in the ongoing administration of harmful interventions, and denial of the subsequent outcomes. Quoting US nurse whistleblower Erin Oszlewski who, like New Zealand database whistleblower Barry Young, was severely censored and attacked, Canadian mind control expert Jason Christoff explains here, the historical context of the role that doctors and nurses have played throughout history, in government programs of harm.

Why do you think, in every single medical euthanasia historical event, who do you think is at the centre of it? It’s the medical system. Each and every time.

One of the most-cited scientists in history, world-leading epidemiologist Professor John Ioannidis from Stanford University is speaking out about the crisis of biomedicine. He rightly states that medical research is being destroyed by vested interests, basic research mistakes and a “deluge of fraudulent research“.

Professor Ioannidis suggests that the solution is to replace corporate-sponsored research funding with public funding. An early example of this is already happening via the Florida Cancer Innovation Fund. Announced by Governor De Santis in September 2025, public money to the tune of $60 million has been dedicated to researching the use of nutrition and repurposed generic drugs in cancer treatment. This is due in no small part to the work of Doctors Paul Marik and William Makis, as described in our April 2026 article A Burgeoning Medical Revolution: The Parasite-Cancer Link.

Via https://nzdsos.com/2026/10/30/vaccine-injured-allison-inquiry/