The Most Revolutionary Act

Uncensored updates on world events, economics, the environment and medicine

The Most Revolutionary Act

“Casualty Cover-up”: Pentagon Hiding US Losses Under Trump in Middle East

Almost 750 U.S. troops have been wounded or killed in the Middle East since October 2023, an analysis by The Intercept has found. But the Pentagon won’t acknowledge it.

U.S. Central Command, or CENTCOM, which oversees military operations in the Middle East, appears to be engaged in what a defense official called a “casualty cover-up,” offering The Intercept low-ball and outdated figures and failing to provide clarifications on military deaths and injuries.

At least 15 U.S. troops were wounded Friday in an Iranian attack on a Saudi air base that hosts American troops, according to two government officials who spoke with The Intercept. Hundreds of U.S. personnel have been killed or injured in the region since the U.S. launched a war on Iran just over a month ago.

President Donald Trump — who wore a blue suit, red tie, and a ball cap to the dignified transfer of the first Americans killed in the war — said casualties were inevitable.

“When you have conflicts like this, you always have death,” he said afterward. “I met the parents and they were unbelievable people. They were unbelievable people, but they all had one thing in common. They said to me, one thing, every single one: Finish the job, sir. Please finish the job.”

On Tuesday, Trump teased that he would wind down the war with Iran in as little as two weeks despite not achieving many of his stated aims, such as “freedom for the people” of Iran, “tak[ing] the oil in Iran,” and forcing Iran’s “unconditional surrender.” At one point, the president even declared that the war would last “as long as necessary to achieve our objective of PEACE THROUGHOUT THE MIDDLE EAST AND, INDEED, THE WORLD!”

CENTCOM has sent outdated statements on casualty numbers, meanwhile, resulting in undercounts, including a statement sent Monday from spokesperson Capt. Tim Hawkins noting that

“Since the start of Operation Epic Fury, approximately 303 U.S. service members have been wounded.”

The comment was three days old and excluded at least 15 wounded in the Friday attack on Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia. The command did not reply to repeated requests for updated figures.

CENTCOM also would not provide a count of troops who have died in the region since the start of the war. An Intercept analysis puts the number at no less than 15.

“This is, quite obviously, a subject that [War Secretary Pete] Hegseth and the White House want to keep under major wraps,” said the defense official who spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to speak frankly.

In 2024, during the Biden administration, the Pentagon provided The Intercept with detailed chronologies of attacks on U.S. bases in the Middle East that listed the specific outpost that was attacked, the type of strike, and whether — or how many — casualties resulted, along with an aggregate count of attacks by country.

The Trump administration’s numbers, by comparison, lack detail and clarity. The current CENTCOM casualty figures do not appear to include more than 200 sailors treated for smoke inhalation or otherwise injured due to a fire that raged aboard the USS Gerald R. Ford before it limped off to Souda Bay, Greece, for repairs. CENTCOM did not reply to close to a dozen requests for clarification on the casualty count and related information sent this week.

“CENTCOM and the White House should be providing accurate and timely information on the costs and casualties involved in this war. After all, it is American taxpayers who are funding it and U.S. economic prosperity and economic wellbeing that is being undermined by it,” Jennifer Kavanagh, the director of military analysis at Defense Priorities, a think tank that advocates for measured U.S. foreign policy, told The Intercept.

As the U.S. has relentlessly bombed Iran, that country has responded with attacks on U.S. bases across the Middle East using ballistic missiles and drones. CENTCOM refuses to even offer a simple count of U.S. bases that have been attacked during the war. “We have nothing for you,” a spokesperson told The Intercept. An analysis by The Intercept, however, finds that bases in Bahrain, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and the United Arab Emirates have been targeted.

On Tuesday, Hegseth said that Iran retained the ability to retaliate for U.S. strikes but that their attacks would be ineffectual.

“Yes, they will still shoot some missiles,” he said, “but we will shoot them down.”

On Wednesday morning, officials in Bahrain, Kuwait, and Qatar all reported missile or drone attacks from Iran.

Iranian strikes have forced U.S. troops to retreat from their bases to hotels and office buildings across the region, according to the two government officials. The defense official was livid about the Pentagon’s failure to adequately harden the bases and ridiculed Hegseth’s Tuesday prayer at a Pentagon press conference.

“May god watch over all of them, each day and each night. May his almighty and eternal arms of providence stretch over them and protect them,” said Hegseth.

“Why didn’t Hegseth protect them?” the defense official asked. “Anyone with a brain knew these attacks were coming.”

Pentagon spokesperson Kingsley Wilson did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Retired Gen. Joseph Votel, a former head of Central Command, recalled that U.S. troops in the region have faced drone attacks for at least a decade.

“At that time we identified a need to protect against this threat, and it has taken far too long for the DoD to respond and provide adequate protection for our deployed troops,” he told The Intercept, referencing drone attacks during the campaign against ISIS in the spring of 2016. “It was a known expectation that, if attacked, Iran would retaliate against our bases, installations, and forces, and I agree that we should have anticipated and been prepared for this inevitability.”

Kavanagh, who previously called attention to the vulnerability of U.S. outposts in the Middle East, echoed Votel.

“It has been clear for years that the rapid proliferation of drones and cheap missiles would put U.S. bases and U.S. early detection radars in the region at risk, yet the Pentagon did little to protect them,” she said. “The failure to invest in hardened infrastructure was a choice. Congress should see this failure as evidence that simply giving the Pentagon more money is not a path to national security.”

“We would be better off if bases across the region were closed for good,” she added.

In public statements, Iran’s foreign minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi called out the U.S. for using civilians in nearby Arab monarchies of the Gulf Cooperative Council states as human shields.

“U.S. soldiers fled military bases in GCC to hide in hotels and offices,” he wrote on X last week. “Hotels in U.S. deny bookings to officers who may endanger customers. GCC hotels should do same.”

Votel also expressed concern about troops using hotels and offices, noting it “could turn normal civilian infrastructure into military targets for the regime.”

Last month, an Iranian drone strike on a hotel in Bahrain wounded two War Department employees, according to a State Department cable reviewed by the Washington Post. CENTCOM did not respond to a request to confirm to The Intercept that those injuries stem from a March 2 attack on the Crowne Plaza hotel, a luxury property in Manama, Bahrain’s capital, but one official indicated this was likely.

Votel said that a failure to provide troops with adequate protection may handcuff U.S. operations.

“I think this really complicates command and control and could affect unit cohesion and effectiveness,” he told The Intercept, referring to the transfer of troops to hotels and office buildings. “That said, we may not have many options if we cannot protect the military bases where they would normally be bedded down.”

At least 15 U.S. troops in the Middle East have died since the beginning of the Iran War, including six personnel who were killed in a drone strike on Port Shuaiba, Kuwait, and a soldier who died due to an “enemy attack on March 1, 2026, at Prince Sultan Air Base, Saudi Arabia.” More than 520 U.S. personnel have also been injured, including those who suffered smoke inhalation on the Ford.

Prior to the current war with Iran, U.S. bases in the Middle East were increasingly targeted by a mix of one-way attack drones, rockets, mortars, and close-range ballistic missiles after Israel’s war in Gaza began in October 2023, most of the attacks occurring in the year following the outset of the conflict. At least 175 troops were killed or wounded in those attacks, including three service members who died in a January 2024 strike on Tower 22, a facility in Jordan. Other attacks targeted al-Asad Air Base, the Baghdad Diplomatic Support Center, Camp Victory, Union III, Erbil Air Base, and Bashur Air Base in Iraq and Al-Tanf garrison, Deir ez-Zor Air Base, Mission Support Site Euphrates, Mission Support Site Green Village, Patrol Base Shaddadi, Rumalyn Landing Zone, Tell Baydar, and Tal Tamir in Syria.

The casualty statistics do not include contractors, most of them foreigners who suffered non-combat injuries. Official U.S. statistics show that there were almost 12,900 cases of injuries to contractors in the CENTCOM area of operations during 2024 alone. More than 3,700 were the most serious non-fatal injuries, including traumatic brain injuries, requiring more than seven days away from work. Eighteen contractors were also killed, all of them in Iraq. The numbers are likely significant undercounts, but if even the fractional number of known contractor injuries is added to the tally, the casualty count for Americans and those on U.S. bases may top 13,600.

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/pentagon-hiding-us-losses-middle-east/5921163

US Army “Uneasy” with the Trump Regime

There is a serious crisis in the US.

The military, or Pentagon as it is more commonly known, has long been uneasy about Trump’s adventurous and reckless policies.

However, the war launched against Iran, and especially the possible ground operation, is causing considerable anxiety among American officers.

Mutiny on Board

The first signs of unrest were seen on the US aircraft carrier USS Gerald Ford.

Trump and his eccentric Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, who sent the aircraft carrier from Venezuela to the waters off Iran, encountered a typical mutiny on board.

First, the ship’s sewage system was damaged by undershirts and socks thrown into the toilets, and then a fire broke out in the laundry room.

The ship is currently undergoing repairs in Crete.

Even before that, following the brutal shelling of so-called drug boats during the blockade of Venezuela, Admiral Alvin Holsey, head of US military forces in Latin America, resigned.

But the real crisis is unfolding now. US President Trump suffered a terrible defeat when he attacked Iran, following Israel’s lead.

Iran attacked all of the US’s allies in the region, primarily Israel, and rendered US bases unusable.

Hegseth and Armageddon

The erratic actions and statements of Pete Hegseth, the alcoholic and Templar who served as a henchman for the megalomaniac Trump, caused significant problems within the military.

Hegseth, who bears a tattoo of the Templars, the most infamous order of the Crusades, sparked outrage with his racist- and Zionist-distorted religious beliefs.

In an interview on CBS News’ “60 Minutes” program in early March, Hegseth claimed that the US military was fighting fanatics who wanted to create a religious “Armageddon.”

The Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF), an organization working to protect religious freedoms in the US military, announced that they had received numerous complaints from the military.

Michael L. Weinstein, the foundation’s founder and former U.S. Air Force member, said they received more than 200 complaints from within the military.

The complaining soldiers stated that their commanders were spreading propaganda claiming that a war against Iran would “start Armageddon and that Trump would hasten the return of Jesus Christ.”

The Forced Resignation of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

Tensions are rising within the U.S. military leadership, particularly following the dismissal of General Randy George, the Chairman of the Army Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Earthquake in the U.S. military! Allegations of generals being dismissed, promotion crisis at the Pentagon.

According to the New York Times, the reaction among senior officers has intensified significantly following the resignation. Many reacted to the dismissal with anger and disappointment, describing it as another blow to an institution already under considerable pressure.

On April 3, Pete Hegseth dismissed Army Chief of Staff General Randy George, along with two other high-ranking generals, Lieutenant General Sarah Clarkson and Major General Phillip Chambers.

On the same day, General David Hodne, who was set to head the Army Training and Transformation Command in 2025, and Major General William Green Jr., head of the Army Moral Support Command, were also dismissed.

The Atlantic magazine, citing sources close to the White House, reports that Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll may also be dismissed.

Some claims suggest the reason for these dismissals is the commanders’ refusal to follow orders!

Hegseth had previously dismissed more than a dozen high-ranking officers, including Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General CQ Brown, Navy Commander Admiral Lisa Franchetti, Air Force Vice Chairman General James Slife, and Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency Lieutenant General Jeffrey Kruse.

Of course, the Israeli and Zionist-controlled American mainstream media attributes the crisis mostly to personnel changes and broader restructuring plans within the Pentagon.

For example, the Washington Post, owned by Jeff Bezos, talks about a large-scale command system overhaul involving the downgrading of regional commands and a reduction in the number of high-ranking generals.

The Real Cause of the Crisis is Iran

However, the real crisis originates from Iran. According to some sources, since February 28th, the US military and its contractors have suffered a total of 13,000 casualties, including dead and wounded.

The commanders knew that Iran was a tough opponent, and Trump didn’t listen to them.

The US military suffered a major loss of prestige, its bases in the Gulf were destroyed, it failed to protect the Arab Sheikhs, and most importantly, it failed to prevent the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

Aircraft carriers were withdrawn to distant locations, fearing Iranian missiles. They lost numerous fighter jets, most notably the prestigious F-35s and AWACS Sentry, not to mention the drones.

The Tomahawk inventory was quickly and significantly depleted. Most importantly, the Trump regime, under Israel’s command, intends to launch a ground operation.

This would mean a terrible loss of troops.

Furthermore, the problem isn’t just a ground operation that would turn into a major fiasco. It’s the fact that Trump and his Armageddon-minded team are even considering dropping an atomic bomb on Iran.

IranThe 460 kilograms of uranium, a potential nuclear bomb candidate, in the hands of the US, and Iran’s super missile capability, are at a level that could provide a countermeasure.

Will There be a Coup?

Discontent within the US military has even led to rumors of a coup in the country. Trump’s irrational and dictatorial rhetoric, and his radical decisions that are accelerating the decline of the US, have already caused widespread outrage in the country.

Trump, whose name appears in the Epstein documents as a child rapist and even murderer, is accused of using these documents to blackmail Israel into attacking Iran.

Essentially, there are numerous reasons/crimes that warrant Trump’s removal from office, ranging from corruption and perversion to fascism, madness, ignorance, and lying.

Now, his meddling with the military and his attempts to use the Pentagon for his own political purposes are angering the establishment.

A madman like Trump might have been useful to them during these crazy times, but he crossed the line a long time ago.

The closure of the Strait of Hormuz and Iran’s “unexpected” successful resistance in West Asia disrupted the global system.

Americans, disturbed by fascist formations like the ICE militia, complain that a Trump coup is underway in the US.

Some argue that the Trump regime has been hijacked by radical Zionists working in the interests of Israel.

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-army-uneasy-trump-regime/5921251

Iran submits demands for end to war as mediators scramble ahead of Trump deadline

(Photo credit: Historic Tel Aviv Bauhaus)

The Cradle

Iran announced on 6 April that it has conveyed its demands on a potential ceasefire with the US and Israel through intermediaries, as US President Donald Trump’s threat to bomb Iranian energy and water infrastructure looms.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei told a news briefing that Tehran has communicated its demands “based on national interests” through regional mediators.

“We have formulated our own set of demands based on our interests and considerations. We are not ashamed to voice our legitimate and logical demands,” he said when asked about the prospect of an end to the war.

Iranian officials have previously stated that Tehran has four main conditions for an agreement: an end to the war and guarantees against future military attacks, compensation for losses during the conflict, recognition of formal control of the Strait of Hormuz, and no limits on its ballistic missile program.

Baghaei stressed that Iranian leaders are committed to continuing the war to defend the country from US-Israeli attacks if necessary.

“Expressing our positions quickly and courageously should not be interpreted as backing down,” he said.

The ministry at the same time expressed doubts about US intentions, stating that “America destroyed the path of diplomacy in months in the worst way, and the world sees that its claims do not match its actions.”

“America gives no value to the security of the region’s countries, and its only obsession is maintaining the existence of the Zionist entity,” the statement added.

The US and Israel launched an unprovoked war on Iran starting on 28 February, including assassinating the Islamic Republic’s supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, despite negotiations taking place at the time described by Omani mediators as “positive.”

US and Israeli attacks have so far killed over 1,340 people in Iran, according to Iranian authorities.

The Iranian Foreign Ministry announcement comes amid a report from Axios claiming that the US, Iran, and a group of regional mediators are discussing a potential 45-day ceasefire meant to lead to a permanent end to the war.

The negotiations are crucial, as US President Donald Trump gave a 48-hour deadline for Iranian leaders to reach a deal with him, including opening the Strait of Hormuz, while threatening to bomb Iran’s electricity and water infrastructure if they refuse.

However, Axios described the chances for reaching a deal before Trump’s deadline of Tuesday at 8:00 pm Eastern Time (ET) as “slim.”

“But this last-ditch effort is the only chance to prevent a dramatic escalation in the war that will include massive strikes on Iranian civilian infrastructure and a retaliation against energy and water facilities in the Gulf states,” the news outlet wrote.

On Sunday, Trump extended the deadline to Tuesday, telling Axios that he was “deep in negotiations” with Iranian officials.

“There is a good chance, but if they don’t make a deal, I am blowing up everything over there,” he claimed.

Last week, during a televised address to the nation, Trump threatened to bomb Iran “back to the Stone Age.”

If Trump orders deliberate attacks on Iran’s civilian infrastructure, such attacks would constitute war crimes.

They would be reminiscent of the US bombing campaign against Iraq during the 1991 Gulf War, which heavily damaged the country’s electricity and water purification facilities. Coupled with economic sanctions over the next decade, the US bombing campaign led to hundreds of thousands of Iraqi deaths.

If Trump makes good on the threat, Iran has, in turn, threatened to retaliate with attacks against power and water infrastructure in Israel and the Gulf states.

Iran’s shuttering of the Strait of Hormuz to the US and its allies has already struck a blow to Gulf oil production, while the targeting of Gulf desalination facilities could eliminate drinking water supplies for a combined 62 million people.

Two sources speaking with Axios said the plan for a major US-Israeli bombing campaign targeting Iran’s energy facilities is “ready to go,” if no deal is reached by the deadline.

The last-minute diplomatic effort reportedly involves Pakistani, Egyptian, and Turkish mediators, according to the four sources. Messages are reportedly being passed between Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.

The sources said the mediators are discussing the terms of a two-phase deal: the first phase would involve a potential 45-day ceasefire, during which a permanent end to the war would be negotiated in the second phase.

According to the sources, a deal to open the Strait of Hormuz and a “solution” for Iran’s highly enriched Uranium, such as removing it from the country or diluting it, would only be reached in the second phase.

The Iranian officials have reportedly insisted to the mediators that they will not agree to a ceasefire similar to that reached in Gaza or Lebanon, where Israel had the ability to carry out additional attacks at any time despite the agreement.

[…]

Via https://thecradle.co/articles/iran-submits-demands-for-end-to-war-as-mediators-scramble-ahead-of-trump-deadline

Ending US-Israeli war on Iran: Ground realities and evidence-based path forward

By Ahmad Habibullah

It’s now common knowledge that all the political fantasies of the US-Zionist alliance that led to the latest unprovoked and inhumane war on Iran have become a nightmare for President Donald Trump, his core team, and the war criminal in Tel Aviv, Benjamin Netanyahu.

To their utter surprise and shock, Iran has courageously fought back with unparalleled and indomitable spirit for over five weeks, following the aggression that led to the martyrdom of over 2,000 people, many of them children and women, with civilians and civilian infrastructure being the main targets.

Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei and some top-ranking military commanders were also assassinated in the very first wave of aggression on February 28.

The brave Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) and the strong Iranian Army, with the full popular support of the Iranian nation, who have been on the streets from day one, will continue to resist this blatant aggression until their legitimate demands, as outlined by the new Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Sayyed Mojtaba Hosseini Khamenei, are met completely and unconditionally.

On the other hand, the United States, with its inflated propaganda and the repeated, often contradictory claims by Trump that it has won the war and achieved all its objectives, is now in a quagmire of heavy and insulting defeat. The loud claims of defeating Iran do not match the harsh ground realities of the war, which Iran is winning and gaining more victories daily.

Below is a brief analysis of the factors leading to this dramatic and unpredictable scenario that has attracted the attention of the whole world these days and has smeared the face of the United States as a failing state and Iran as a heroic nation.

  1. The pre-planning of the war was not initiated by the US political establishment or its military. Rather, it was the war-mongering idea of Netanyahu from about 40 years ago, painted with far-fetched, unachievable aims, and was practically lobbied by AIPAC through Zionists and Neocons within the US political system. He then found the right opportunity to pressure President Trump to strike Iran after the media exposed the Jeffrey Epstein scandal.
  2. None of the objectives that were loudly claimed to be the reasons for unleashing the aggressive war on Iran have been achieved so far. “Regime change” has basically failed; there is no certainty that the nuclear program has been completely eradicated, and the Strait of Hormuz is still under the control of the IRGC. The so-called “most powerful army” in the world has suffered a humiliating defeat it never imagined at the hands of a comparatively much weaker country militarily: Iran.
  3. While Trump repeatedly claimed that the Iranian navy, ground forces, and air force were destroyed, the technological superiority of the US Army has been completely defeated, and it has failed on the ground. Every day, several hi-tech US drones and several of its top-class fighter jets, including the untouchable and so-called formidable jets, are being shot down. Interestingly, all this billions-of-dollars-worth of military equipment is being shot down by relatively very cheap Iranian military drones and interceptors designed and developed indigenously.
  4. If the US were indeed winning the war, the top American army generals and officials would be awarded medals and honors. However, adding to the current quagmire, several of its top military officials, including the chief of staff of the US Army, have been fired by the Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth. This is strong evidence not only of the failure of the top military leadership in their practical war strategy but also indicates their disagreement with Trump and Hegseth.
  5. There is rising global condemnation of the illegal and unnecessary war against Iran, which has now isolated the US and its ally, the rogue Zionist regime. Especially the bombing of Minab School, which caused the brutal massacre of nearly 170 school children, has led to worldwide protests and sympathy for the Iranian nation, despite the US propaganda of face-saving excuses. Aside from nearly all Asian, Latin American, and African countries that have opposed this aggression against Iran, the European allies of the US and members of NATO have decided that they will not take part in this war and will not allow their airspace for US military purposes.
  6. The rallies all over the U and many European countries against Trump, his international and domestic policies, and his close relationship with the child and female sex mafia chief Jeffrey Epstein have led to a new movement that is growing day by day and seeks to ultimately remove him from power. There is a strong possibility that he will be impeached next year.
  7. The decline of US power started several years ago and has been progressing steadily because of several factors. The internal factors include rising political corruption, instability of government and private institutions, a wide gap between rich and poor, over three trillion dollars of national debt, suppression of freedom of speech, undue intervention in academic affairs by polarized government policies, violent suppression of protests in top universities, nationwide police brutality (especially recently by ICE), racial injustice, blockade of immigrants who were the backbone of the low-paid workforce for years, and highly intelligent students and intellectuals who were the basis of the intellectual and technological superiority of American universities and institutions. There is also rising public awareness that members of the United States political establishment are serving the interests of the Zionist regime rather than the interests of their own country. Finally, there is a media campaign that calls for a renewal of the whole so-called democratic but tyrannically capitalist system of the United States.
  8. The external factors that have turned the US into a paper tiger superpower include the long-standing failed foreign policy of the country, which is mostly based on hegemony, regime change operations, targeted assassinations, a war-based economy, all-out support of the Zionist regime, support of weaker countries that serve as vassal states and lack the support of their own people but provide oil and other benefits such as minerals, exploitations and interventions in several Asian, African, and Latin American countries, and overall behaving as hegemon in every country, bypassing the United Nations. In addition, the launch of the recent MAGA project introduced by Trump, with aggressive policies of high-handed tariffs and derogatory political and economic tactics even against friendly nations, has significantly contributed to its overall decline.

All these factors have led to subtle opposition over recent years, leading to new alliances confronting the United States and its hegemonic policies. The US has, in fact, created its own enemies. The BRICS, SCO, and Sahel Alliance are examples of a rising multipolar world that will ultimately take over the future of the world economy and overwhelm the military superiority of the United States.

The start of the war has led to a change in the geopolitics of South Asia and especially the West Asian region. There is increased insecurity among Persian Gulf states, which have heavily and solely relied on the US for their security. They will not be security partners of the US in the future, irrespective of the outcome of the current war.

On the other hand, the overall failure of the US military-industrial complex, the destruction of its regional military bases, radars, military planes, fighter jets, drones, and other such facilities, and everything that supported its military or war-based economy in the Persian Gulf states, and its crushing defeat by the IRGC and the Iranian Army, have earned respect for Iranians as a heroic nation in the world.

Especially for most Muslim and developing countries that were previously afraid of even murmuring against the oppression of the US, Iran has solidly proven that a courageous nation can be successful and defeat the strongest army and has shown them the path to follow. This will have a long-lasting impact, especially in West Asia, with the ultimate eviction of the American forces from the region and its replacement by a friendly alliance of Muslim nations with the support of China and Russia.

The rapid and powerful rise of resistance movements against the US-Zionist aggression in recent years has added a new game-changer not only in West Asia but also worldwide. The Ansarullah resistance movement of Yemen has yet to play its important and strategic role in the ongoing war in support of Iran.

The blockade of the Bab al-Mandab Strait will definitely have a crippling effect on the already deteriorating economic situation of Europe, the United States, and other Western countries.

In addition, African and Latin American countries are coming together and gaining the courage to confront the US and European colonialist policies. This will definitely lead to the emergence of new anti-colonialist and resistant alliances in these continents against the United States.

End of war: Shallow conjecture-based proposal

A shallow conjecture-based proposal would be to advise Iran to accept the repeated requests by the US government to end the war and agree to negotiate on the 15 unrealistic, cruel, and one-sided points of the aggressive enemy, and not consider the 5 realistic and legitimate points proposed by Iran, as reported by Press TV for the first time.

It is now well-known and based on reports published in international journals and books written by famous political scientists, psychologists, and psychiatrists that Trump is a narcissistic psychopath with a dangerous delusional personality.

He is highly unreliable, lacks emotional stability, and has mental problems. He is heavily under the influence of neocon Zionists who are blackmailing him for his close association with Jeffrey Epstein.

His statements uttered without cortical involvement, such as that Iran will be sent “back to the Stone Ages, where they belong,” indicate the bluffs of a politician not fit for any office.

In addition, considering past experiences, there is no guarantee that Iran will not be attacked, will not be subjected to more unjust and crippling sanctions, will not be a victim of external and internal conspiracies, assassinations, and other internationally defined violations of human rights.

There is absolutely no possibility of any mutual nonaggression pact with the US whereby it will not strike Iran in the future. Any suggestion of future economic interactions with the US while it has heavily sanctioned Iran for years is a political fantasy and a dumb idea that has nothing to do with reality.

While Trump has announced that the war against Iran has ended, the US Army is continuously bombing Iran every day without any distinction between civilian and military targets. In addition, the US and the illegitimate Zionist Regime have previously been deceptive and have deceived the Iranians.

They started the war while indirect nuclear negotiations were going on. The 12-day war ended with a ceasefire; however, in December 2025, they again conspired and orchestrated nationwide violent riots, damaging public properties, killing public and government police and security personnel, and attempting to provoke public sentiments against the government with all-out media propaganda.

There is a complete lack of trust on the Iranian side in any proposal from the US side. Thus, the proposal to end the war at this stage, when the US is clearly losing it on all fronts, is akin to falling into the deceptive trap, showing a lack of political foresight, not considering the precious gains Iran has achieved so far – both militarily and politically – and finally losing its global position as the leading resistant nation.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/04/06/766388/ending-us-israeli-war-iran-ground-realities-evidence-based-path-forward

Americans call for 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office

Press TV

A firestorm of bipartisan condemnation has erupted following US President Donald Trump’s Easter speech regarding the ongoing war of aggression against Iran.

A growing number of lawmakers, experts, and commentators have called for Trump’s immediate removal from office by invoking the 25th Amendment, denouncing him for launching an unprovoked and unnecessary war against the Islamic Republic of Iran.

The 25th Amendment to the US Constitution, ratified in 1967, establishes the process for removing a president who is unable to perform his duties. Section 4, which has never been invoked, allows the vice president and a majority of the cabinet to declare the president “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.”

The US president’s Easter message, posted on the completion of one-month of the US-Israeli war on Iran, has drawn sharp rebuke for its content and tone.

US politicians, including some of Trump’s former allies and staunch opponents, described the statement as “psychotic,” “unhinged,” and evidence of a severe mental decline.

Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) was among the first to sound the alarm, saying the president’s words on the war against the Islamic Republic were more than just troubling.

“One month after starting the war in Iran, this is the statement of the President of the United States on Easter Sunday,” Sanders wrote. “These are the ravings of a dangerous and mentally unbalanced individual. Congress has got to act NOW. End this war.”

Representative Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) echoed Sanders’ concerns with even stronger language, directly questioning the president’s mental state.

“This is psychotic,” McGovern stated bluntly. “The President of the United States needs to get help. Totally unhinged and extremely dangerous.”

The calls for action were not limited to the US Congress. Several commentators and former political figures focused on the 25th Amendment to have Trump removed from office.

Former Republican Congressman Joe Walsh, once a Trump supporter turned fierce critic, pointed to the irony of the timing.

“His Easter morning post. And just 2 days ago, one of his ‘religious advisors’ compared him to Jesus Christ,” Walsh wrote. “He will forever be a stain on this country. And the world. 25th Amendment. Now. And to everyone else who, unlike Trump, understands & celebrates today – Happy Easter.”

The sentiment was shared by author and attorney Seth Abramson, who posed a straight question about the Republican Party’s inaction.

“I’m not saying this rhetorically—I’m speaking literally here,” Abramson said. “At what point do Republicans admit that Trump has lost his mind and replace him with Vance through the 25th Amendment? Never? Do we need to see a nuclear weapon dropped on a city of 10 million innocent civilians first?”

Concerns about the president’s mental fitness also came from medical professionals. Harry Sisson cited the reaction of Dr. Vin Gupta, a respected pulmonologist and health expert.

“Dr. Vin Gupta, a highly respected medical expert, has reacted to Trump’s insane Easter message amid ongoing questions about his health,” Sisson posted.

“‘The President is exhibiting all the signs of dementia.’ Trump has gone crazy and he’s showing it on the world stage.”

Other Democratic lawmakers and political activists questioned why the president’s own cabinet has remained silent so far, pointing to complicity in his actions.

Representative Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.) did not mince words, unequivocally calling the US president a threat to American national security.

“The 25th Amendment exists for a reason,” Ansari wrote. “The President of the United States is a deranged lunatic, and a national security threat to our country and the rest of the world.”

Representative Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.) also weighed in, invoking a classic metaphor to describe the US president’s apparent lack of self-awareness.

“The emperor has no clothes,” Stansbury wrote. “Time for the #25thAmendment. Congress and the Cabinet must act.”

Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) addressed the gravity of the situation as the US losses in the war against Iran pile up, emphasizing the deadly consequences of Trump’s erratic behavior.

“If I were in Trump’s Cabinet, I would spend Easter calling constitutional lawyers about the 25th Amendment,” Murphy wrote. “This is completely, utterly unhinged. He’s already killed thousands. He’s going to kill thousands more.”

Activist Melanie D’Arrigo said the Trump cabinet’s inaction in the face of war against Iran is a deliberate choice, pointing to potential personal gain as a motive for their silence.

“If you’re wondering why Trump’s cabinet isn’t invoking the 25th Amendment after yet another unhinged post announcing war crimes in the war he started that his family and donors are personally profiting from…” D’Arrigo wrote.

“It’s because they’re happily complicit and compromised.”

Journalist and social media influencer Candace Owens called it “a satanic administration.”

“We all realize that satanic Zionists occupy the White House and Congress needs to move to have the Mad King Trump removed,” she wrote.

“All of our lives may depend upon other countries realizing that Trump is deeply unwell and surrounded by religious fanatics who have convinced him that he is a messiah. We are in uncharted territory. Leaders worldwide need to act accordingly.”

Former San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo said the American public has now seen enough to demand action, placing the burden squarely on the Trump cabinet.

“Our President posted this message to the world on Easter Sunday,” Liccardo said.

“The public now clearly knows that Trump is no longer mentally fit to hold office. Each member of his cabinet has a moral and professional duty to act under the authority of the 25th Amendment; remove him.”

[…]

https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/04/06/766399/emperor-has-no-clothes-americans-call-25th-amendment-remove-trump-from-office

Russia Sends Six Submarines to Strait of Hormuz

Chechen Troops Assembled to Aid Iran if Invaded, as China Reportedly Preps 100,000 Troops

Moscow has officially deployed six submarines, including two nuclear ones, near the Strait of Hormuz for a discreet mission to protect Iranian infrastructure, according to reports. Their primary role is to prevent the United States and Israel from freely entering the strait or approaching the Iranian coast.

This deployment sends a strong political message to the West, signaling that any major escalation against Iran could directly involve Russia. The presence of two nuclear-armed subs also seems to indicate that if Iran is hit with nuclear weapons, another nearby country that attacks, will also be nuked.

Yesterday, Chechen troops were publicly assembled and at that assembly it was announced they would go to Iran to fight the United States and Israel if Iran is invaded.

Late last night, I received a single report from a single source, which I am as yet UNABLE TO CONFIRM, saying China is prepping troops from its People’s Liberation Army, to enter Iran and defend it if the US invades.

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/russia-sends-six-submarines-strait-hormuz/5920983

 

 

Pfizer Halts COVID Shot Trial Because They Can’t Find Enough Test Subjects Willing to Take Another Booster Shot

Those seeking their 6th booster are now either dead, disabled or have finally woken up to reality.

Pfizer and BioNTech have halted a large U.S. clinical trial for their updated COVID-19 booster injection because they could not find enough participants willing to take another mRNA shot.

The study, targeting healthy adults aged 50–64, required tens of thousands of participants. Despite this, enrollment failed, confirming that public demand for COVID boosters has completely collapsed.

Those seeking their 6th booster are now either dead, disabled or have finally woken up to reality.

A recent Rasmussen survey found that 56% of Americans believe the COVID-19 vaccines have caused large numbers of deaths.

At the same time, real-world uptake has collapsed—only about 18% of Americans received a booster during the 2025–2026 season.

The era of mass booster compliance is over.

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/pfizer-halts-covid-shot-trial/5921033

The Shift: Democratic Party Debate over AIPAC Heats Up

Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker at the World Economic Forum in 2023 (Wikimedia)Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker at the World Economic Forum in 2023 (Wikimedia)

A Democratic National Committee member says she will introduce a resolution rejecting AIPAC spending at this month’s DNC meeting.

“At a time when Democratic voters might really not have felt represented or seen when it came to Gaza or seeing their party support Palestinian rights or stand against military conflict, this could be one step toward bringing those voters back into the party,” the committee member, Allison Minnerly, told The Intercept’s Matt Sledge.

“Given the recent primaries in Illinois, but also what we’ve seen across the country, I think it’s important that we specify that AIPAC as a growing force in our primaries needs to be specifically addressed when we talk about dark money,” she added.

If Minnerly’s name rings a bell, it might be because she introduced Resolution 18 last year. It called for a ceasefire in Gaza, suspension of U.S. military aid to Israel, and recognition of Palestinian statehood. Her effort was ultimately watered down, then unceremoniously dismissed at the DNC’s summer meeting in Minnesota.

“The fight over Resolution 18 was more than a simple vote over a symbolic resolution. The story shows how the Israel lobby is doing all it can to prevent Democratic Party leadership from honoring the overwhelming will of party members. It also is a harbinger of fights to come, as support for Palestine only continues to grow in the party in reaction to Israel’s genocide in Gaza,” wrote Nadia Ahmad at Mondoweiss at the time.

The same is true this time around.

The new resolution is also symbolic, but it gets Democrats on the record regarding a lobbying group that has already become a hot-button issue among presidential hopefuls.

One such example is Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, who is attempting to distance himself from past AIPAC connections based on the direction of the political winds.

“It became an organization that was supporting Donald Trump and people who follow Donald Trump,” Pritzker declared after the group spent heavily in Illinois’s recent primaries. “AIPAC really is not an organization that I think today I would want any part of.”

A spokesperson for the Governor reiterated that Pritzker “withdrew his support” from the group after it “became a pro-Trump organization.”

Pritzker’s statement makes it seem as if AIPAC is a well-intentioned group that has been led astray amid the current political climate. He’s constructed a fantasy, but there’s an obvious reason behind the fabrication. He’s creating a narrative where his past support can be excused. He didn’t change in this story, they did.

You see lawmakers push similar stories when it’s time to lightly criticize an ongoing genocide. The U.S./Israel relationship remains sacrosanct. The whole business has simply been muddied by Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu.

Just days after the Pritzker’s comments, Holly Otterbein and Alex Thompson published an illuminating report in Axios detailing the extent of his pro-Israel connections and they go far beyond AIPAC.

When he was president and head of the Pritzker Family Foundation it gave $82,000 to Friends of the Israel Defense Forces and $1.7 million to the American Israel Education Foundation, the AIPAC-affiliated group that sponsors trips to Israel for lawmakers.

“Pritzker has tried to walk a fine line — breaking with AIPAC over its affiliation with Trump rather than Israeli actions — and focusing most of his criticism on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rather than on the country itself,” notes the Axios piece.

It’s doubtful he can continue to maintain this position without some major pushback from the party’s left flank, of which Minnerly’s resolution is just the latest example.

Hasan Piker and the Democrats

In a truly breathtaking move, a number of Democratic leaders have recently spent their time denouncing Hasan Piker.

The left-wing Twitch streamer is set to hit the campaign trail in support of Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed, which has led to condemnations from two of his opponents state Sen. Mallory McMorrow and Rep. Haley Stevens. He’s also facing backlash from Michigan Senator Elissa Slotkin.

Piker is consistently criticized because, among other things, he said that October 7th was a “direct consequence” of Israel’s actions and that the United States’s foreign policy led to the 9/11 attacks. He’s been smeared as a antisemite and compared to Holocaust deniers for such statements.

However, most voters have grown skeptical of Israel and many probably agree with Piker’s consistent criticisms of Zionism.

Israel’s reputation is in the toilet among people who consider themselves Democrats, and people who consider themselves Independents. The most recent Gallup poll on the issues shows that a majority of Americans sympathize with Palestinians more than Israelis.

“We have to be serious here about who’s going to be the best general election candidate for U.S. Senate in Michigan to beat Mike Rogers, and someone who’s campaigning with someone like that is not going to win in Michigan,” Hayley Stevens tells Jewish Insider.

What is this assertion based on exactly? If campaigning with (the extremely popular) Piker is a liability for El-Sayed, then surely Stevens’s AIPAC’s connections are a potential messaging problem.

As usual, there are a variety of double standards at work here. Slotkin says that Piker “sounds deeply antisemitic” because he’s criticized Zionists, but the same week she appeared on Bill Maher’s show, a guy who has been making actual bigoted comments for decades.

Establishment Dems obviously want to make example of Piker and quash growing pro-Palestine sentiment among Democratic voters. One of the main groups attacking him has been the centrist think tank Third Way. The group says it want to “reduce far-left influence and infrastructure” within the Democratic party, which shouldn’t be especially daunting since there is none.

Andrew Perez has a good piece at Zeteo summing this up.

“Third Way is targeting Piker as part of a broader effort to keep the Democratic Party under the control of big corporations, the ultra-wealthy, and supporters of Israel, no matter what the party’s base wants,” he writes.

[…]

Via https://mondoweiss.net/2026/04/the-shift-the-democratic-party-battle-over-aipac-heats-up/

Iran Turns US Rescue Operation into Military Debacle

By Ivan Kesic

April 5, 2026

In a stunning display of coordinated defensive warfare, Iranian forces – combining the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC), police commando units, Basij resistance fighters, and regular army elements – destroyed two American C-130 transport planes and two Black Hawk helicopters in southern Isfahan province early on Sunday.

The complex operation transformed a US rescue mission into the most embarrassing American military debacle since the 1980 Tabas desert catastrophe.

The thirty-seventh day of the US-Israeli aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran did not begin with American triumph as some US officials claimed, but with Iranian fire.

Just after dawn on Sunday, Washington launched what it would later desperately frame as a successful rescue operation for a downed F-15E pilot from the 3 April engagements.

Instead, the mission became a complete operational collapse.

Within hours, the spokesperson for the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters announced that Iranian joint forces had destroyed two C-130 military transport aircraft and two Black Hawk helicopters in southern Isfahan province.

Images of burning wreckage – geolocated and verified by Press TV – circulated across global platforms, drawing immediate and unavoidable comparisons to Operation Eagle Claw, the failed 1980 American rescue mission that ended with eight US soldiers dead and aircraft abandoned in the Tabas desert in South Khorasan province.

For the Islamic Republic, it was not merely a defensive feat. It was historical revenge, divine justice, and a military-technological declaration that US power holds no sway over Iranian skies, contrary to the claims of US President Donald Trump and his war minister.

Desperate rescue born from earlier defeat

The events of Saturday cannot be understood in isolation. They were the direct consequence of the black day that had struck American air power on April 3, when Iranian integrated air defense networks downed an F-15E Strike Eagle over central Iran, along with an A-10 Thunderbolt II over the Persian Gulf, multiple MQ-9 Reaper drones, Hermes reconnaissance platforms, and cruise missiles.

The F-15E, a twin-seat multirole strike fighter valued at over $90 million, disintegrated upon impact in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province in central Iran.

The crew member or members remained missing, despite an initial American extraction bid that cost the aggressors two Black Hawk helicopters damaged by Iranian ground fire on April 3. There is no evidence that the US forces were able to locate the pilot. 

By Saturday, US commanders faced an impossible choice: abandon a missing airman to Iranian custody, or launch a deeper, riskier incursion into sovereign Iranian territory.

They chose the latter. That decision would prove catastrophic.

The Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters later confirmed that the Americans had planned what they called a “deceive and immediate escape mission,” using an abandoned airport in southern Isfahan Province as a covert staging point.

Iranian intelligence, however, had already mapped the operation.

Morning of 5 April: Joint forces spring the trap

According to reports, at approximately 09:20 local time on April 5, American aircraft began entering Iranian airspace to search for the missing pilot.

The formation included two C-130 Hercules transport planes—four-engine turboprop workhorses designed for tactical airlift, paratroop drops, and medical evacuation—alongside two UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters providing close support and personnel extraction.

According to operational summaries released by the IRGC and confirmed by the Law Enforcement Command, the US aircraft attempted to descend toward the pre-identified abandoned airport.

What the Americans did not anticipate was the full integration of Iranian defensive assets: IRGC Aerospace Force radar and missile batteries, police special operations commando units positioned on the ground, Basij resistance fighters familiar with the mountainous terrain, and regular army air defence elements all operating under a single command structure.

The spokesperson for the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters described the response as “divinely guided and precisely timed.”

As the C-130s approached their landing zone, Iranian police commando units opened heavy fire from multiple directions, immobilizing the first transport aircraft before it could unload its personnel.

Minutes later, IRGC air defence systems locked onto the second C-130 and the two Black Hawks. One by one, the American aircraft were struck.

Two C-130s and two Black Hawks as the toll of defeat

By 10:20 local time, Iranian media began broadcasting the first official confirmations.

The Khatam al-Anbiya spokesperson announced that two Black Hawk helicopters and one C-130 military transport plane had been destroyed, left burning in southern Isfahan.

Subsequent detailed reporting, including images released by local media and verified by geolocation analysis, revealed the full scope: two C-130 aircraft had been hit, not one.

The discrepancy was explained by the dynamics of the engagement; the first C-130 was immobilized by police commando fire and then completely destroyed minutes later, while the second was struck during an attempted escape manoeuvre.

Both Black Hawk helicopters were downed in the vicinity of the abandoned airport, their wreckage scattered across the arid landscape.

At least five American personnel were killed in the operation, according to Iranian military sources. Some unofficial reports have put the death toll even higher.

The IRGC’s Public Relations Department issued a terse but devastating statement.

“The invading enemy aircraft in southern Isfahan, including two Black Hawk helicopters and two C-130 military transport aircraft, were hit and are now burning in the flames of the wrath of the heroic fighters of Islam,” it stated.

For the first time since the aggression began on 28 February, Washington had lost not just strike aircraft but the very platforms designed to retrieve downed pilots, a catastrophic failure of combat search-and-rescue doctrine.

Tabas parallel: History repeats as humiliation deepens

Even before the smoke had cleared over Isfahan, the city known for its picturesque gardens and magnificent monuments, Iranian officials and social media users alike drew an unmistakable historical parallel: the failed American Operation Eagle Claw of April 1980.

That aborted mission, launched during the first year of the Islamic Revolution, had sought to rescue US captives from Tehran but ended in disaster at a remote desert in Tabas.

A sandstorm, equipment failures, and a catastrophic collision between a C-130 transport plane and an RH-53 helicopter had killed eight American servicemen and left the wreckage of multiple aircraft abandoned on Iranian soil.

The United States had suffered not just military defeat but global humiliation at the time.

On 5 April 2026, 46 years later, history repeated itself with even greater Iranian proficiency.

Where the 1980 Tabas operation had failed primarily due to weather and mechanical issues, the 2026 Isfahan defeat was the product of deliberate, coordinated Iranian defensive action.

Iranian forces did not wait for nature to defeat the Americans; they destroyed them directly, using domestically developed weapons, real-time intelligence integration, and the courage of IRGC, police commandos and Basij volunteers.

Images circulating on social media juxtaposed the burning C-130 wreckage of 2026 with black-and-white photographs of the Tabas desert debris field from 1980.

The message was unmistakable: forty-six years after its first humiliation in the Islamic Republic, the United States had learned nothing and lost even more.

Joint nature of victory: Police, IRGC, Basij, and Army

What distinguishes the 5 April operation from previous Iranian defensive successes, including Tabas, is the breadth of its joint character.

The Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters spokesperson explicitly named the participating forces: the IRGC Aerospace Force and Ground Forces, the regular Army, volunteer Basij resistance units, and law enforcement police commandos.

This was not a narrow military engagement but a national defensive mobilization.

The police special units, in particular, played a decisive role in immobilising the first C-130, demonstrating that Iranian law enforcement personnel are fully integrated into the country’s layered air defence architecture.

Local sources also reported that a refuelling aircraft belonging to the intruding US forces was shot down in southern Isfahan Province, targeted by elite police commando units.

The Law Enforcement Command confirmed that precise monitoring of enemy aerial movements, combined with rapid and coordinated responses, had made the operation possible.

For Iranian military planners, the Isfahan victory validated years of investment in joint command, control, communications, and intelligence integration—capabilities that American military assessments had consistently underestimated or dismissed.

American narrative: Desperate spin and visible silence

In the hours following the Isfahan debacle, US President Donald Trump took to social media to claim that a “daring” and “miraculous” rescue operation had successfully extracted the missing F-15E pilot with no American losses.

Iranian officials responded with immediate statements, mocking the US president’s claim.

Speaker of the Iranian Parliament Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf posted an image of the destroyed C-130 wreckage on his X account, writing with sharp sarcasm: “If the United States gets three more victories like this, it will be utterly ruined.”

The IRGC Intelligence Organization highlighted the absence of any photographs or video evidence of the supposedly rescued pilot—a stark contrast to the abundant Iranian imagery of burning American aircraft.

Iranian analysts noted that even if the American narrative were accepted at face value, the cost of the operation had been catastrophic: two C-130 transport planes, two Black Hawk helicopters, and an unknown number of casualties, all for the extraction of a single airman who had been shot down days earlier because American air superiority had already failed.

The Khatam al-Anbiya spokesperson dismissed Trump’s claims as an attempt to “justify the bitter defeat and failure of his weak army by creating ambiguity in public opinion,” adding that the United States had not even reported its full losses in the region for several days.

The contrast between Iranian transparency—releasing geolocated images, detailed operational summaries, and official confirmations—and American evasion could not have been starker.

Technical and strategic implications: The death of CSAR doctrine

The destruction of two C-130 transport aircraft and two Black Hawk helicopters on 5 April carries profound technical and strategic implications that extend far beyond the immediate tactical defeat.

Combat search and rescue, or CSAR, has been a cornerstone of American air power doctrine since the Vietnam War.

The Isfahan operation has demonstrated that Iranian defensive networks can not only shoot down American strike aircraft but also systematically dismantle the very rescue architecture designed to recover them.

The C-130, a four-engine turboprop transport with a maximum takeoff weight exceeding 70,000 kilograms, is not a nimble penetration aircraft; it relies on prior suppression of enemy air defences to operate safely.

Its destruction over southern Isfahan, experts say, proves that the US-Israeli aggression has failed to achieve any meaningful suppression of Iran’s integrated air defence network.

The Black Hawk, a twin-engine utility helicopter equipped with advanced avionics, night-vision capabilities, and defensive countermeasures, was similarly neutralized.

For American military planners, the lesson is devastating: no US aircraft, whether strike fighter or support transport, can consider Iranian airspace survivable.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/04/05/766350/from-tabas-isfahan-iran-destroys-two-us-c130s-echoing-eagle-claw-debacle

Planet Labs withholds US Military Loss Imagery on Trump Censorship Request

This sequence of Planet Labs satellite images shows Dubai’s Jebel Ali port before and after an attack.

Press TV

Satellite imaging company Planet Labs says it will indefinitely withhold visuals of American military losses to comply with a censorship request from US President Donald Trump amid the ongoing US-Israeli aggression against Iran.

In an email to customers on Saturday, the US company announced that the Trump administration had asked satellite imagery providers to impose an “indefinite withhold of imagery.”

Planet Labs further said that it would now switch to a “managed distribution of images” deemed not to pose a risk to safety.

The firm, which was founded in 2010 by former NASA scientists, will release imagery on a case-by-case basis for urgent, “mission-critical requirements or in the public interest.”

“These are extraordinary circumstances, and we are doing all we can to balance the needs of all our stakeholders,” the California-based firm said.

The restriction expands upon a 14-day delay on imagery of the Persian Gulf and West Asia region that Planet Labs implemented last month, which extended an initial 96-hour delay.

The firm said the move was meant to “prevent adversaries from using the imagery to attack the US and its allies.”

Planet Labs said it will withhold imagery dating back to March 9 and that it expects the policy to remain in effect until the end of the war.

The US and Israel started a fresh round of military aggression against Iran on February 28, some eight months after they carried out unprovoked attacks on the country.

The US-Israeli aggression led to the martyrdom of the Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, and hundreds of Iranian civilians, including women and children, as well as several senior military commanders.

Iran began to swiftly retaliate against the strikes by launching barrages of missiles and drone attacks on Israeli-occupied territories as well as on US bases and interests in regional countries.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/04/05/766357/Planet-Labs-withholds-US-military-loss-imagery-amid-Trump-censorship-request