Unknown's avatar

About stuartbramhall

Retired child and adolescent psychiatrist and American expatriate in New Zealand. In 2002, I made the difficult decision to close my 25-year Seattle practice after 15 years of covert FBI harassment. I describe the unrelenting phone harassment, illegal break-ins and six attempts on my life in my 2010 book The Most Revolutionary Act: Memoir of an American Refugee.

Volkswagen faces chip crisis after Dutch government seizes chip factory

Volkswagen faces chip crisis after Chinese factory seized by EU state – Bild

RT

Dutch authorities took control of semiconductor producer Nexperia in September under pressure from the US

Germany’s largest carmaker, Volkswagen, could stop production at a key plant due to a shortage of semiconductors caused by the seizure of a Chinese-owned chipmaker by the Netherlands, Bild has reported, citing anonymous sources.

The Dutch government took control of the Nexperia factory in Nijmegen late last month, citing intellectual property and security concerns. The New York Times reported last week after reviewing documents from an Amsterdam court that the move had been made following pressure from US officials. Nexperia’s parent company, Wingtech, was blacklisted by Washington in 2024 as part of an ongoing trade war with China.

Beijing responded in early October by banning Nexperia from exporting finished chips from China, which are widely used in the electronic control units of VW vehicles.

Bild reported on Wednesday that Volkswagen – which also owns the Skoda, Seat, Audi, Porsche, Lamborghini, and Bentley brands – does not currently appear to have an alternative to Nexperia chips.

Sources in the company told the paper that due to the lack of semiconductors it plans to stop production at its plant in Wolfsburg from next Wednesday. Volkswagen Golf models will be affected first, followed by other vehicles, they said.

If the situation does not improve, work could also be halted at Volkswagen’s facilities in Emden, Hanover, Zwickau, and elsewhere, a person familiar with the matter said.

According to the report, the carmaker has started talks with the German authorities about a state-backed reduced working hours scheme for tens of thousands of its employees.

Bild warned that the chip crisis could also impact other carmakers in the country. Representatives for BMW and Mercedes told the paper that they were analyzing the situation. The German automobile industry has already been suffering due to high energy costs as a result of EU sanctions on Russia over the Ukraine conflict and increased US tariffs.

A spokesman for Volkswagen’s Zwickau plant told AFP that the report by Bild was
[…]

Schools targeted, two killed as massive Israeli strikes hit Lebanon’s Bekaa Valley

Smoke rises from the site of Israeli strikes that targeted the town of Shmester in the Bekaa region of Lebanon on October 23, 2025.

Press TV

Israel has launched massive airstrikes on Lebanon, targeting southern and eastern parts of the country, killing at least two people and injuring several others, including school children. 

Lebanese media reports said that the aerial raids on Thursday targeted southern and eastern parts of Lebanon, including the Bekaa Valley and the outskirts of Hermel, as well as the town of Shmistar, where a school was damaged by the attacks.

According to al-Manar and al-Mayadeen’s correspondents in the area, at least two civilians were killed and a number of others were injured on the outskirts of Shmestar, where the Israeli warplanes carried out a series of strikes on the surrounding highlands west of Baalbek.

The bombardment also shattered windows, injuring several students at two local schools.

Lebanon’s Ministry of Education and Higher Education condemned the Israeli attacks near Shmestar and Tariya High Schools in the Baalbek district.

The ministry called on governments worldwide to exert pressure to halt the persistent Israeli aggression, emphasizing that the attacks endanger schools and civilians, leaving martyrs and wounded, while terrorizing local communities.

Separately, al-Mayadeen said that Israeli strikes also hit the outskirts of Nabi Sheet, near the Lebanese-Syrian border, as part of the ongoing aerial bombardment in eastern Lebanon.

Lebanon’s official National News Agency confirmed that “Israeli warplanes launched a series of violent strikes on the eastern mountain range” in the Bekaa region near the border with Syria.

It said two Israeli strikes targeted the Hermel range, in the northernmost part of the Bekaa. The viral images show massive plumes of smoke rising from the mountainous areas in the southern region.

Israeli media claim the strikes hit military sites belonging to the Radwan force of the Lebanese resistance movement, Hezbollah. It added that the site was used for the production of strategic weapons.

The attacks mark yet another violation of the ceasefire agreement with Lebanon that came into force in November 2024.

On Wednesday, an Israeli drone strike in Ain Qana killed one civilian, adding another attack to the series of strikes that contravene the November 27, 2024, ceasefire agreement between Lebanon and Israel.

Repeated Israeli attacks, extending across southern Lebanon, the Bekaa Valley, and Beirut’s Southern Suburb, have resulted in dozens of casualties and significant damage to civilian infrastructure. Since the ceasefire, over 270 Lebanese civilians have been killed in Israeli strikes.

In 2023, the Israeli regime markedly escalated its deadly aggression against the country in response to Hezbollah’s determined and back-to-back solidarity operations in support of the Gaza Strip, which had come under a war of genocide by Tel Aviv.

The strikes would exponentially target sensitive and strategic sites across the occupied Palestinian territories, and eventually forced the regime to agree to a ceasefire deal with Hezbollah in November last year.

Sheikh Naim Qassem, the Lebanese resistance movement Hezbollah’s secretary-general, in remarks on Tuesday, stressed that Lebanon’s stability was contingent upon halting Israeli violations and aggression, and warned about the country being dragged by the United States into Tel Aviv’s so-called “Greater Israel” scheme.

The resistance leader reaffirmed that Hezbollah’s weapons were an integral part of Lebanon’s strength and sovereignty, emphasizing that the regime did not want a strong Lebanon.”

Sheikh Qassem cautioned that the American intervention in Lebanon and the region “is extremely malicious,” describing Washington as the primary force “leading genocide and massacres.”

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2025/10/23/757449/Lebanon-Israel-Bekaa-Hezbollah-US-Sheikh-Naim-Qassem

Russia turning ‘defeat’ in Syria into new partnership

Russia has turned a ‘defeat’ in Syria into a new partnership

By Murad Sadygzade

Earlier this month, Syria’s transitional president Ahmad al-Sharaa arrived in Moscow for his first official visit. The trip marked a symbolic milestone. It was the first time Russia hosted a Syrian leader since the dramatic December 2024 events in Damascus, when the regime of Bashar Assad fell and the country came under al-Sharaa’s leadership.

Talks between al-Sharaa and Russian President Vladimir Putin were held behind closed doors in the Kremlin and lasted more than two and a half hours – underscoring the significance of the meeting for both sides. According to official statements, discussions focused on bilateral relations, prospects for economic and humanitarian cooperation, and the evolving situation in the Middle East. A special part of the agenda was devoted to the future of Russia’s military bases in Tartus and Hmeimim, which remain of strategic importance to Moscow.

According to international agencies and Reuters sources, the Syrian side raised the issue of extraditing the deposed Assad, who is now in Russia. However, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov emphasized that Moscow saw no grounds for such an extradition. Facing complex internal and external pressures, Syria’s new leader has sought to maintain existing agreements with Russia and has taken a pragmatic approach in his dialogue with Moscow, counting on Russian support for the country’s reconstruction, assistance in security matters, and mediation in resolving internal and regional conflicts.

President Putin, in turn, reaffirmed that relations between Russia and Syria have always been based on respect for sovereignty and guided solely by the interests of the Syrian people. He described the October parliamentary elections as an important step toward stabilizing the country and consolidating its society.

Despite skepticism among Western analysts and hasty claims of Moscow’s “final defeat” in Syria after the events of late 2024, the actual policy of the new Damascus leadership paints a very different picture. Ahmad al-Sharaa, having assumed power after a dramatic political transition, not only preserved but also reaffirmed the strategic significance of Russia-Syria relations. His first visit to Moscow took place in an atmosphere of acknowledgment of Russia’s special role in Syria’s security and recovery, as well as a shared desire to build pragmatic and mutually beneficial dialogue.

For the new Syrian leadership, Moscow has remained a guarantor of stability and development prospects – a fact underscored by ongoing consultations and meetings in the Kremlin. Russia’s military bases, cooperation agreements, and strategic backing have proved valuable not only under the previous regime but also amid Syria’s new political course. Contrary to predictions of losing its “last foothold,” Russia has managed to retain and even strengthen its position: diplomacy has proven flexible, and mutual trust between the two nations has endured through the turning point.

The current reality confirms the strategic foresight and consistency of Moscow’s approach to the Syrian crisis and the broader Middle East. Russia’s calm, systematic policy – focused on long-term interests and a balanced alignment of regional priorities – continues to offer Damascus the choice of partnership and ensures Moscow’s sustained geopolitical influence even after profound regional change.

The economic dimension of Russian-Syrian relations is also entering a new phase of revitalization. Following the Moscow talks, both sides agreed to convene a meeting of the Intergovernmental Commission on Trade and Economic Cooperation in the near future, as confirmed by Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak. Despite the modest scale of bilateral trade in recent years – between $650 million and $1 billion, constrained by conflict and sanctions – both parties have expressed determination to restore and expand these volumes.

The Russian side has expressed its readiness to continue implementing projects in Syria’s oil fields, including on facilities requiring development or reactivation, as well as newly explored sites. Russian companies have been present in Syria’s oil sector for many years, and their involvement is now expected to expand. Beyond energy, Moscow has shown strong interest in the modernization of Syria’s transport infrastructure and the restoration of the national energy system using Russian technologies and equipment. Russia currently has around 40 investment projects in Syria across key sectors essential for the country’s recovery – including energy, transport, housing construction, and industrial development.

In the humanitarian sphere, cooperation remains a vital area of bilateral engagement. During the talks, the two sides discussed humanitarian deliveries to Syria, with the Syrian delegation expressing particular interest in supplies of wheat, food, and medicine. President Putin reaffirmed Russia’s readiness to continue assisting the improvement of Syria’s socioeconomic conditions and to maintain humanitarian support. Over the years, Russia has sent substantial volumes of aid to Syria – including medical equipment, pharmaceuticals, food, school supplies, and other essential goods.

Both parties also agreed to review and update all bilateral agreements and contracts, bringing the legal framework in line with current realities and the interests of the Syrian people. Special attention will be given to training programs – both civilian and military – and to cooperation in education and culture. Notably, Russia’s Goznak, the company responsible for printing paper money and minting coins, recently signed a contract to produce new Syrian banknotes, underscoring the expansion of practical cooperation even in highly specialized areas.

A key component of bilateral cooperation remains the export of Russian agricultural products and their role in ensuring Syria’s food security. In 2025, Syria faced an unprecedented food crisis caused by the most severe drought in 36 years, which reduced wheat production by about 40 percent. According to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the wheat deficit this year amounts to 2.73 million tons – enough to feed approximately 16 million people for a year. More than half of Syria’s population of 25.6 million suffers from food shortages, and nearly three million people are at risk of acute hunger.

In 2025, the new Syrian government purchased only 373,500 tons of wheat from domestic farmers – roughly half the previous year’s figure. A Syrian government official reported that the country needs to import about 2.55 million tons of wheat this year. According to the Ministry of Agriculture, Syria will have to import a record 2.15 million tons of wheat in the 2025–2026 season – 53 percent more than in the previous season. The 2025 harvest will cover only 19 percent of the country’s annual demand of 4 million tons, leaving a deficit of around 80 percent.

After the change of power in December 2024, shipments of Russian wheat to Syria were temporarily suspended due to uncertainties regarding the new leadership and payment arrangements. However, by April 2025, Russia resumed grain exports. The first batch of 6,600 tons of wheat arrived at the port of Latakia on April 20, marking the beginning of renewed regular deliveries. During the recent Kremlin talks, the Syrian side reaffirmed its interest in continued imports of wheat, food, and medicine, and these issues were included in the bilateral working agenda. Russian wheat has become more than a commodity — it is now an instrument of humanitarian stabilization, helping to avert a large-scale catastrophe and ensure the survival of millions of Syrians.

Furthermore, Syria remains heavily dependent on Russia in regards to national security, particularly amid ongoing Israeli aggression and the urgent need to restore the combat readiness of its armed forces after years of conflict and political upheaval.

Since the beginning of 2025, Israel has intensified its military operations against Syria. Between January and May alone, Israeli Air Force aircraft carried out more than 300 airstrikes on Syrian army facilities across various provinces. Following the fall of Assad, Israel deployed ground forces into southwestern Syria, near the Golan Heights, effectively expanding its military presence in the area.

In July 2025, Israeli airstrikes twice targeted the Syrian Armed Forces General Staff building in Damascus, as well as the presidential palace and other strategic facilities. The attacks form part of Israel’s broader strategy to create a controlled buffer zone in southern Syria and prevent the redeployment of Syrian military formations south of Damascus.

Under the current circumstances, the continuation of Russia’s military presence in Syria – including the naval base in Tartus and the air base in Hmeimim – has become a critical factor in deterring external threats and a guarantee of the country’s territorial integrity. During the October talks in Moscow, both sides discussed the future of Russia’s military presence and the possible reconfiguration of its facilities to reflect the new realities on the ground.

An equally important area of cooperation remains the restoration of Syria’s defense capability. It was largely thanks to Russia’s efforts in previous years that the 4th and 5th Army Corps were formed, trained, and equipped; the elite “Tiger Forces” unit was reorganized; and the Syrian army’s command structure and operational effectiveness were restored. Russian military advisers played a decisive role in the reorganization and technical modernization of the Syrian Armed Forces, helping to restore their capacity for autonomous combat operations.

During the transitional period, Russia reaffirmed its commitment to continued cooperation in the fields of security and personnel training, both civilian and military. When Syrian Foreign Minister Assaad al-Sheibani visited Moscow in July 2025, Russian Defense Minister Andrey Belousov held talks with his Syrian counterpart to discuss the future of bilateral military cooperation.

The first official visit of Syria’s new president to Moscow convincingly dispelled Western predictions about the collapse of Russian influence in the Middle East following the fall of the Assad regime. The lengthy discussions with President Putin and the agreements reached across a wide range of issues – from the maintenance of military bases and economic recovery to the crucial supply of wheat amid a food crisis – clearly demonstrated that the new Syrian leadership views Russia as an indispensable strategic partner.

Amid Israeli aggression, domestic challenges, and the urgent need for national reconstruction, Damascus has made a deliberate choice to deepen cooperation with Moscow in the military-political, economic, and humanitarian spheres – decisions that underscore the strategic foresight and consistency of Russia’s regional policy.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/626825-russia-syria-new-partnership/

Germany to pay US military staff hit by govt shutdown

NATO member to pay staff hit by US govt shutdown

RT

Germany will cover wages for personnel working on US military bases in the country

Germany plans to pay thousands of employees stationed at American military bases in the country whose salaries have been affected by the US government shutdown, the Finance Ministry in Berlin has announced.

The US federal government shut down on October 1 after Republicans and Democrats failed to agree on a spending bill in the Senate. The impasse has left hundreds of thousands of federal employees either furloughed or working without pay as the standoff enters its fourth week.

A spokeswoman for the German Finance Ministry told AFP on Wednesday that Berlin would “initiate an unscheduled expenditure to ensure that October salaries are paid on time.”

She described the measure as “a sign of solidarity with the US armed forces stationed in Germany and their civilian employees.”

The arrangement was reached together with the German state of Rhineland-Palatinate, home to several large American bases, including Ramstein Air Base – the headquarters of US Air Force in Europe and Africa.

Germany, a key NATO ally of the United States, hosts more American military installations than any other European country, with around 120 sites. The long-standing US presence dates back to the end of World War II.

Berlin expects to be reimbursed once Washington resumes payments, the spokeswoman said.

US President Donald Trump has directed the Pentagon to ensure that American service members continue to receive pay during the shutdown.

The funding lapse occurred after US lawmakers failed to agree on extending federal health care subsidies, which are set to expire. Republicans have pushed for a short-term spending bill to keep the government open while broader budget talks continue, while Democrats have insisted the subsidies be extended before approving any deal, warning that millions of Americans could face sharp increases in health insurance premiums. The two sides continue to accuse each other of using the crisis for political gain.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/626827-germany-military-bases-us-shutdown/

Pentagon announces new press corps after mainstream exodus

Pentagon announces new press corps after mainstream exodus

RT

The reshuffle followed a decision by several outlets to reject the Department of War’s new media access policy

The Pentagon has unveiled the lineup of its new press corps, which is mainly comprised of conservative news outlets seen as supportive of US President Donald Trump’s administration.

The reshuffle at the Department of War came after journalists from major outlets, including The New York Times, the Associated Press, CNN, and the Washington Post, rejected a revised media access policy introduced by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and returned their press passes last week.

Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a post X on Wednesday that more than 60 reporters, “representing a broad spectrum of new media outlets and independent journalists,” will make the “the next generation” of the Pentagon press corps after signing up to the new rules.

They will be joining 26 journalists from 18 outlets that used to work at the Pentagon previously and also opted to agree to the new access policy, he added.

Under the updated policy, reporters could be deemed “a security or safety risk” if they reach out to employees at the Pentagon for sensitive information to be used in their reporting on the US military. According to Hegseth, it is being introduced to make sure that “press no longer roams free… wear visible badge… [and] no longer permitted to solicit criminal acts.”

The additions to the Pentagon press corps include such right-leaning outlets as the Gateway Pundit, the National Pulse, Human Events, Timcast by podcaster Tim Pool, the Just the News, the Washington Reporter, LindellTVby Trump’s ally MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell, Frontlines by Turning Point USA, co-founded by the late conservative activist Charlie Kirk, and others.

Parnell slammed those who protested the amended rules, saying that the “self-righteous media… chose to self-deport from the Pentagon.”

“Americans have largely abandoned digesting their news through the lens of activists who masquerade as journalists in the mainstream media,” he claimed.

The Washington Post previously explained its refusal to accept the new rules by saying that they “undercut First Amendment protections by placing unnecessary constraints” on journalists. The New York Times accused the Pentagon of threatening to punish reporters for “ordinary news gathering.”
[…]

Smoke and Mirrors: What I See in Trump’s Deal With Pfizer

Mollie Engelhart

I am a mother. I have never been vaccinated myself. I believe deeply in informed consent. And I want to say clearly that I am hopeful about Bobby’s leadership at HHS. I want to believe he can bring real transparency and accountability to a government that has too often cozied up to the corporations it is supposed to regulate.

But when I read the headlines about Trump’s “landmark” deal with Pfizer, I don’t feel hopeful. I feel misled.

We are told that Pfizer has committed seventy billion dollars to research, development, and production here in the United States. That sounds impressive, like a historic victory for the American people. But the truth is, Pfizer already spends billions every year on research and development. That is simply the business they are in. Without that constant pipeline, they do not survive.

So what is really new here? Nothing at all. It is the same budget they were already going to spend, repackaged and sold as a bold new commitment. The difference now is that Pfizer gets something in return: tariff relief, political cover, and a government-backed direct-to-consumer program called TrumpRx.

That is what makes this deal so frustrating. Pfizer is not changing its behavior. They are not suddenly sacrificing profits or doing more for patients. They are being rewarded for business as usual, only now with added advantages that strengthen their market position even more. And we are being asked to celebrate it as if it is some great victory for ordinary families.

Every producer wants to cut out the middleman. I know this from my own life. As a meat producer, I do not want to pay one. As a vegetable producer, I do not want to pay one. As a content creator, I do not want to pay one. Nobody does. And now Pfizer, of all companies, is getting the official blessing of the U.S. government to do exactly that.

This is the same Pfizer that misled the public during COVID. That is not a rumor, it is documented. Whistleblowers from trial sites described falsified records, patients who were not properly followed up after adverse events, and unqualified staff handling sensitive data. State attorneys general have accused Pfizer of downplaying serious risks, including heart inflammation in young men and pregnancy complications in women. Kansas has even claimed the company hid internal studies that showed risks while telling the public something different. And the most central promise of all, that the vaccines would stop transmission, simply was not true, even though the marketing never caught up to that reality.

Meanwhile, Pfizer made billions from a product that the government helped mandate, all while enjoying liability protection. So I cannot celebrate when the same company announces what it calls a “new commitment.” It feels like smoke and mirrors.

And then there is the larger picture. The United States is the biggest consumer of pharmaceuticals in the world. No other country takes more pills, shots, or prescriptions. Yet our health outcomes are the worst among wealthy nations. We spend the most money, we take the most drugs, and we die younger. Our life expectancy is the lowest in the developed world. Our rates of chronic illness, diabetes, obesity, and preventable death are higher than our peers. How can that be? How can the country that consumes the most medicine also be the sickest?

That contradiction tells me something important. The problem is not that we lack access to drugs. The problem is that we have built a culture that relies on them for everything. Every ache, every fear, every deviation from perfect health is met with another prescription. And the more drugs we consume, the worse our outcomes become.

That is why this deal troubles me so deeply. Instead of asking why Americans are drowning in pharmaceuticals, our leaders are handing the biggest player in the game even more power. Instead of creating a system that helps families thrive without being tethered to pills and injections, we are applauding a corporation for doing what it was already going to do, while giving it special advantages in the marketplace.

As a mother, my concern is not whether Pfizer builds more factories in America. My concern is whether my children will inherit a country where health means a lifetime of prescriptions, or one where health means strong food systems, clean environments, community, and prevention. I want to live in a nation that addresses the root causes of disease, not one that doubles down on drugs as the only solution.

When I look at this deal, I do not see a victory for the American people. I see a victory for Pfizer. They get tariff protection, direct access to consumers, and the ability to present their ordinary budget as if it were a gift. And the rest of us are left with more of the same.

[…]

Via https://mollieengelhart.substack.com/p/smoke-and-mirrors-what-i-see-in-trumps

Pfizer’s Birth Control Shot Used by 25% of U.S Women Linked to Disabling Brain Tumors

by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

A massive study of 61 million women finds Depo-Provera increases risk of meningioma by 240% as criminal enterprise Pfizer faces a tsunami of lawsuits.

For decades, Pfizer has marketed its injectable birth control Depo-Provera as a convenient, long-acting option for women. What few were told — and what new research now confirms — is that this hormone shot doubles the risk of developing brain tumors.

The latest study, published in JAMA Neurology by researchers from the Cleveland Clinic and Case Western Reserve University, examined over 61 million U.S. medical records spanning two decades. Among these, women who used Depo-Provera — formally known as depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) — were found to have a 2.4-fold higher risk of developing meningioma, a slow-growing but potentially disabling brain tumor.

Depo-Provera has been used by roughly 1 in 4 sexually active women in the United States — a staggering figure given the now-documented neurological danger. The study found the highest tumor risk in women who started injections after age 31 or continued for more than four years.

Though meningiomas are often labeled “benign,” their growth can compress vital brain structures, leading to vision loss, cognitive decline, seizures, and paralysis.

More than 1,000 women across the country have already filed suit against Pfizer, alleging that the company knew for decades about the potential for tumor formation yet failed to adequately warn users.

Evidence cited in the legal filings traces concerns back to 1980s studies linking synthetic progestins to brain tumor proliferation — long before the FDA finally approved Depo-Provera for contraception in 1992.

Notably, the FDA had initially rejected Pfizer’s application for contraceptive approval for nearly 40 years, citing cancer risks. When the product was finally approved, a “black box” warning was added years later — but only for bone-density loss, not for brain tumors.

In 2023, Pfizer quietly acknowledged to regulators that data showed a possible link between Depo-Provera and meningioma, yet claimed the evidence was “inconclusive.” The company’s motion to dismiss ongoing litigation argues that it had asked the FDA to update the label — an apparent attempt to shift responsibility to the agency itself. However, the corrupted FDA denied the labeling change because they claimed the available studies didn’t support the warning.

What This Means

The number needed to harm in the JAMA analysis was 1,152 — meaning that for every 1,152 women given Depo-Provera, one is expected to develop a meningioma attributable to the drug. Multiplied across millions of exposed users, the potential burden is enormous.

[…]

Via https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/new-study-pfizers-birth-control-shot?r=6fupxd

The War on Drugs Is a CIA Psyop for Control of the Trafficking

Is Trump’s plan to wage war against all of South America?

Having labeled Venezuela’s Nicolas Maduro as a narco-terrorist, today Trump extended that label to Colombia’s President, Gustavo Petro and called for war against his country. The Colombia drug history is rife with CIA involvement, in particular, an internal struggle for a power grab of the trafficking which Nixon and Bush coined as the war on drugs.

In the 1880’s opioids were introduced to America via “the Chinese slave labor trade”.

Opium dens were replete throughout urban cities that were home to Chinese districts; San Francisco, Philadelphia, NYC and Chicago. The vast majority of the addicts were white, middle to upper class women. Blackmailed to bring more customers.

By 1875, the federal government became involved, selectively raising the import tariff on the smoking grade of opium.  Cocaine or pure cacao was also prevalent from the late 19th century forward as an elixir or simply vial in the medicine cabinet. Years ago when clearing out my mother’s belongings as she was moving east, I stumbled upon a beautiful sterling silver miniature coffee pot with a spoon. When I asked my mother about it, she simply said it was grandad’s tonic. It was still full. Pure cacao – not the chemical laden toxic drug we call cocaine.

By 1909, the government had enacted an Act prohibiting opium use except for medicinal purposes. By 1919 prohibition was levied which did little to curb alcohol and drugs – instead forcing them underground and into the hands of mafia cartels.  When FDR lifted Prohibition, he stated told Americans not to abuse this return of ‘personal freedom’.

By 1929, a Federal Agency was formed as a task force for the War on Drugs headed by Harry Anslinger. But it was the Assistant Director of this Narcotics Division who was found to be guilty via his formation of relationships with gangsters and bootleggers. Including one, Arnold Rothstein, a racketeer, crime boss and kingpin of the Jewish Mob in New York. He was credited with turning street crime into high stakes business opportunities for vast wealth. Rothstein was the first racketeer to fix the World Series whereby he profited quite nicely.

The War on Drugs never accomplished much of anything because ultimately, the federal government and the CIA wanted control over this very lucrative enterprise and pushed out the mafia so they could take the helm. Local police were insiders. Mayors and governors were insiders. It became a family affair within the highest pinnacles of the triangulated pyramid of politics.

During WWI and WWII, the military was one of the largest purveyors of cocaine, opioids and cannabis for soldiers. To sustain them before they died in the fields. Korea, Vietnam, Gulf War, all soldiers were either offered and/or participated in the use of drugs to survive. A practice well known and accepted by superiors at the Pentagon.

With the advent of Alan Dulles, the drug trade took on monumental proportions, Hollywood was keen to participate, and the ‘feel good’ society of the 1960’s Me Movement solidified the CIA drug cartel. By the 1980’s, the CIA had moved offices into Colombia and became the overlords of the local cartels and George Bush was all aboard the drug train while publicly announcing his own version of the War of Drugs – that has never existed.

When Trump claims he is spiking a War on Drugs, we have seen this stage plot unfold for decades. The end game is for America to become the head of the drug cartel globally. Relieving competition of their lives, the fear of god is interred. Why? Because the money attached is in the realm of $700 billion to $1 trillion – annually. And money is Trump’s impetus in all things whether it be Gaza, Ukraine, Venezuela, Colombia, Qatar, or Saudi Arabia. His love language.

With Trump’s latest claim that he will soon personally secure $20 TRILLION in investments, the details are nonexistent.  Including who will benefit given that the peasant class, those whose wealth is under a billion, seem to be left in the proverbial and literal cold.

Perhaps the CIA was losing control of their drug trafficking cartel. Perhaps the Ukraine grain trains are no longer operable. And perhaps the current presidents of Venezuela and Colombia are not as acquiescent as previous rules of order declared. But given history is replete with CIA involvement, it would be hard-pressed to think they are not giving the orders to Trump so as to reign in the competition.

Whatever the impetus to bomb these South American countries may be, we can be sure it is NOT a War on Drugs – it is a War for Control of Drugs.

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/war-drugs-cia-psyop-control-trafficking/5903381

Amazon Plans to Automate 75 % of Operations, Cutting Over 160,000 U.S. Jobs

 

Amazon Factory Robots

The Blogging Hounds

Amazon is reportedly pursuing a sweeping automation initiative that could reshape its workforce landscape in the United States. According to internal documents obtained by multiple news outlets, the company aims to automate up to 75 percent of its operations, avoid hiring more than 600,000 U.S. workers by 2033, and eliminate around 160,000 American roles by 2027.

Automation Strategy and Scale
Internal planning documents reveal that Amazon’s robotics division envisions a future in which robots perform the bulk of tasks now handled by human employees. The company projects that by 2033 it could avoid hiring more than 600,000 U.S. workers, even as its sales volume is expected to roughly double. In the near term, the documents suggest that approximately 160,000 U.S. roles may be cut by 2027 as the firm deploys machines in warehouses and logistics operations.

Why Automation Matters: Cost, Efficiency, Competition
The rationale is clear: by automating routine picking, packing and delivery operations, Amazon expects to save about 30 cents per item shipped, with estimated savings of around $12.6 billion between 2025 and 2027. Such cost advantages are especially powerful in the highly competitive e-commerce sector, where margins are thin and speed matters. With rivals potentially pressured to follow suit, the automation wave may extend beyond Amazon alone.

Evidence and Reporting
Major outlets—including The New York Times and technology publications—report that these plans stem from internal Amazon documents viewed by their journalists. For instance, one article states:

“The company’s robotics team has an ultimate goal to automate 75 percent of its operations.”
However, Amazon’s official response notes that the leaked documents reflect the view of “one team” and do not necessarily represent the company’s overall hiring strategy.

[…]

Via https://theblogginghounds.com/2025/10/21/amazon-plans-to-automate-75-of-operations-cutting-over-160000-u-s-jobs/

Historic Corporate/Intelligence Ties to Evangelical Movement

Big Brethren

Four Corners (2025)

Film Review

The Plymouth Brethren (formerly the Exclusive Brethren)* is a church of 55,000 members worldwide (mainly Australia, New Zealand, the UK and Canada). Its international headquarters operates out of a suburb of Sydney. It broke away from the Anglican Church in the 19th century and rarely admits new members.

People who have left the church call it a psychological cult. Car racing, cinemas, camping, pet, radios, jeans, voting and swimming pools are forbidden to Plymouth Brethren members. Banned from leadership positions, women are discouraged from working outside the home. More recently the church has lifted the former ban on cellphones and laptops. However only church-supplied hardware (with pre-installed surveillance technology) is permitted.

The leadership of the church, known as Universal Business Group, runs it as a business with $22 billion annual turnover. Australian Bruce Hales, church president since 2022, is an accountant, and his sons run UBG. Each owns massive property portfolios along with score of companies worth billions of dollars in annual sales. Hales has no training or background in theology.

In 2024 the Australian tax office conducted an unannounced raid on UBG headquarters and confiscated all their computers and phones as part of a tax evasion/fraud investigation. Some lapsed members believe the raid relates to efforts by church leaders to sway Australia’s 2022 election.** Although Plymouth Brethren members have a religious exemption from the compulsory voting laws, they supplied dozens of church members to campaign for Australia’s conservative Coalition and made multiple campaign donations just under the reporting threshold. During the Covid pandemic Australia’s Coalition government paid UBG $54 million for Rapid Antigen tests.

Brethren survivors also report an epidemic of child sexual abuse. One survivor sued the leadership and was offered a $1 million provided conditional on signing a non-disclosure statement. He refused.


*According to historian Matt Ehret, the Plymouth Brethren and other evangelical sects trace back to an agent of the British East India Company named Anthony Norris Groves. Groves was sent to the Ottoman Empire and then India in 1830 as an orientalist engaged in recruiting young elites to train in British universities while carrying out espionage under the banner of Christian missionary work. Groves was soon joined by John Nelson Darby (godson of Admiral Horatio Nelson and father of modern rapture theology).

Darby’s influence can also be seen in the works of Charles Fox Parham (the founder of Pentecostalism), George Pember, (the originator of the ‘fallen Nephilim’ interpretation of demonology now advanced by the alien disclosure movement), Dwight Lyman Moody (founder Moody Bible College), and James Hall Brookes (founding father and president of the Niagara Bible Conference, which helped spread Dispensationalism across America).

In fact, the entire Christian Zionist movement of war-pushing, faith-healing, rapture-loving preachers from John Hagee to Benny Hinn and Pat Robertson all sit on foundations created by Darby’s Plymouth Brethren—not the Bible.

See

Matthew Ehret: The Plymouth Brethren, British intelligence and mystic cults in Palestine

**The Exclusive Brethren made a similar attempt to influence the outcome of New Zealand’s 2005 election. See https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Exclusive_Brethren/New_Zealand_election,_2005