by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The European database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, which also tracks reports of injuries and deaths following the experimental COVID-19 “vaccines.”

Here is what EudraVigilance states about their database:

This website was launched by the European Medicines Agency in 2012 to provide public access to reports of suspected side effects (also known as suspected adverse drug reactions). These reports are submitted electronically to EudraVigilance by national medicines regulatory authorities and by pharmaceutical companies that hold marketing authorisations (licences) for the medicines.

EudraVigilance is a system designed for collecting reports of suspected side effects. These reports are used for evaluating the benefits and risks of medicines during their development and monitoring their safety following their authorisation in the European Economic Area (EEA). EudraVigilance has been in use since December 2001.

This website was launched to comply with the EudraVigilance Access Policy, which was developed to improve public health by supporting the monitoring of the safety of medicines and to increase transparency for stakeholders, including the general public.

The Management Board of the European Medicines Agency first approved the EudraVigilance Access Policy in December 2010. A revision was adopted by the Board in December 2015 based on the 2010 pharmacovigilance legislation. The policy aims to provide stakeholders such as national medicines regulatory authorities in the EEA, the European Commission, healthcare professionals, patients and consumers, as well as the pharmaceutical industry and research organisations, with access to reports on suspected side effects.

Transparency is a key guiding principle of the Agency, and is pivotal to building trust and confidence in the regulatory process. By increasing transparency, the Agency is better able to address the growing need among stakeholders, including the general public, for access to information. (Source.)

Their report through May 22, 2021 lists 12,184 deaths and 1,196,190 injuries following injections of four experimental COVID-19 shots:

• COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE MODERNA (CX-024414)
• COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE PFIZER-BIONTECH
• COVID-19 VACCINE ASTRAZENECA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19)
• COVID-19 VACCINE JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S)

From the total of injuries recorded, there are 604,744 serious injuries which equals over 50%.

“Seriousness provides information on the suspected undesirable effect; it can be classified as ‘serious’ if it corresponds to a medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalisation, results in another medically important condition, or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.”

A Health Impact News subscriber in Europe ran the reports for each of the four COVID-19 shots we are including here. This subscriber has volunteered to do this, and it is a lot of work to tabulate each reaction with injuries and fatalities, since there is no place on the EudraVigilance system we have found that tabulates all the results.

Since we have started publishing this, others from Europe have also calculated the numbers and confirmed the totals.*

Here is the summary data through May 22, 2021.

Total reactions for the experimental mRNA vaccineTozinameran (code BNT162b2,Comirnaty) from BioNTech/ Pfizer: 5,961 deaths and 452,779 injuries to 22/05/2021

• 13,531   Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 59 deaths
• 9,828     Cardiac disorders incl. 735 deaths
• 71           Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 4 deaths
• 5,468     Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 3 deaths
• 183        Endocrine disorders
• 6,266     Eye disorders incl. 14 deaths
• 41,214   Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 216 deaths
• 128,031 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 1,909 deaths
• 327        Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 27 deaths
• 4,802     Immune system disorders incl. 31 deaths
• 13,948   Infections and infestations incl. 648 deaths
• 4,821     Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 81 deaths
• 10,374   Investigations incl. 221 deaths
• 3,354     Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 120 deaths
• 65,326   Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 71 deaths
• 250        Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 15 deaths
• 81,748   Nervous system disorders incl. 616 deaths
• 279        Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 7 deaths
• 88           Product issues
• 7,978     Psychiatric disorders incl. 94 deaths
• 1,342     Renal and urinary disorders incl. 93 deaths
• 1,570     Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 3 deaths
• 18,597   Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 697 deaths
• 21,101   Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 53 deaths
• 663        Social circumstances incl. 9 deaths
• 160        Surgical and medical procedures incl. 10 deaths
• 11,459   Vascular disorders incl. 225 deaths

Total reactions for the experimental mRNA vaccine mRNA-1273(CX-024414) from Moderna: 3,365 deaths and 72,596 injuries to 22/05/2021

• 1,335     Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 22 deaths
• 2,045     Cardiac disorders incl. 370 deaths
• 12           Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 2 deaths
• 718        Ear and labyrinth disorders
• 37           Endocrine disorders incl. 1 death
• 997        Eye disorders incl. 4 deaths
• 6,305     Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 108 deaths
• 20,774   General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 1,480 deaths
• 129        Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 8 deaths
• 691        Immune system disorders incl. 4 deaths
• 2,392     Infections and infestations incl. 183 deaths
• 1,292     Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 63 deaths
• 1,743     Investigations incl. 77 deaths
• 816        Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 64 deaths
• 9,149     Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 62 deaths
• 77           Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 11 deaths
• 12,314   Nervous system disorders incl. 339 deaths
• 83           Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
• 11           Product issues
• 1,375     Psychiatric disorders incl. 51 deaths
• 468        Renal and urinary disorders incl. 40 deaths
• 175        Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 1 death
• 3,513     Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 306 deaths
• 3,726     Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 23 deaths
• 259        Social circumstances incl. 9 deaths
• 235        Surgical and medical procedures incl. 26 deaths
• 1,925     Vascular disorders

Total reactions for the experimental vaccine AZD1222/VAXZEVRIA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19) from Oxford/ AstraZeneca: 2,489 deaths and 655,534 injuries to 22/05/2021

• 7,200     Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 100 deaths
• 9,748     Cardiac disorders incl. 311 deaths
• 103        Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 2 deaths
• 6,740     Ear and labyrinth disorders
• 217        Endocrine disorders incl. 2 deaths
• 10,591   Eye disorders incl. 8 deaths
• 69,826   Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 116 deaths
• 178,037 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 685 deaths
• 396        Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 20 deaths
• 2,409     Immune system disorders incl. 9 deaths
• 13,832   Infections and infestations incl. 163 deaths
• 5,870     Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 46 deaths
• 13,474   Investigations incl. 50 deaths
• 8,405     Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 35 deaths
• 104,075 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 25 deaths
• 222        Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 6 deaths
• 141,437 Nervous system disorders incl. 388 deaths
• 156        Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 3 deaths
• 76           Product issues
• 12,272   Psychiatric disorders incl. 21 deaths
• 2,264     Renal and urinary disorders incl. 20 deaths
• 3,327     Reproductive system and breast disorders
• 21,237   Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 278 deaths
• 29,750   Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 14 deaths
• 582        Social circumstances incl. 4 deaths
• 498        Surgical and medical procedures incl. 15 deaths
• 12,790   Vascular disorders incl. 168 deaths

Total reactions for the experimental COVID-19 vaccine JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S) from Johnson & Johnson: 369 deaths and 15,281 injuries to 22/05/2021

• 145        Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 10 deaths
• 264        Cardiac disorders incl. 34 deaths
• 8             Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
• 77           Ear and labyrinth disorders
• 5             Endocrine disorders incl. 1 death
• 191        Eye disorders incl. 2 deaths
• 1,302     Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 11 deaths
• 3,619     General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 97 deaths
• 38           Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 2 deaths
• 51           Immune system disorders
• 245        Infections and infestations incl. 8 deaths
• 209        Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 6 deaths
• 1,134     Investigations incl. 23 deaths
• 104        Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 10 deaths
• 2,368     Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 12 deaths
• 12           Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
• 3,051     Nervous system disorders incl. 48 death
• 7             Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
• 8             Product issues
• 181        Psychiatric disorders incl. 3 deaths
• 69           Renal and urinary disorders incl. 4 deaths
• 62           Reproductive system and breast disorders
• 637        Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 29 deaths
• 324        Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 1 death
• 39           Social circumstances incl. 2 deaths
• 214        Surgical and medical procedures incl. 20 deaths
• 917        Vascular disorders incl. 46 deaths

Via https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/12184-dead-1196190-injuries-european-database-of-adverse-drug-reactions-for-covid-19-vaccines/

By Israel Shamir

Greenville Post

The uprising began in rebellious Moscow, where the city arbitration tribunal demanded that Google restore a deleted YouTube account or pay billions of dollars in fines.

The digital giants have taken over the world. Nobody has ever amassed this much power. Hitler would die of envy if shown the greatness of Google. Huxley and Orwell’s protagonists could only dream of what Bezos and Gates do. The latter overthrew the US President and installed one they prefer, and for good reason. The combined net worth of the top 100 ultra-rich people in the US has skyrocketed by $195 billion since Biden took office, according to Bloomberg’s calculations. These giants control the minds of billions. Nations hock their lands and industries to purchase their patent medicines. These giants know our faces, our names, all about us, even the cells we are made of, down to the last protein. Gods have been defeated, gentle Christ and mighty Sabaoth, not to mention angry Allah.  that a thing of which it said, ‘See, this  new’? (Eccl 1:10) No, my jaundiced ancestor was right — it has already been done in the ages before us.

[…]

The uprising began in rebellious Moscow, where the city arbitration tribunal demanded that Google restore a deleted YouTube account or pay billions of dollars in fines. Impossible, you’d say — Google free to do whatever they want. They shadow-banned Unz.com; its brother giant Twitter banned Trump; there is no way to overturn their decisions, for such companies are private, and private property sacred — otherwise it’s Communism and Gulag; they can do whatever they want, and their smart lawyers have already included their right to unplug you in every one-click contract agreement.

Yet Russia isn’t all that different from any other Western nation. Until this happened, the Russian legal system had refused to consider claims against the tech giants. Russian law did not allow for it. It was enough for the giants to stipulate that all claims should go to London or to some other tame court of their preference for the Russians to meekly submit. However, the giants overreached themselves when they blocked this avenue to sue them in a Western jurisdiction for many Russians. The Russians responded by creating a new law that established the priority of their national law, and required the courts and tribunals to accept and judge the cases if there is no way to sue in the agreed Western jurisdiction.

This new law was applied by the Moscow Arbitration Tribunal after Google, in July 2020, deleted the account of Tsargrad, a Christian conservative TV channel and news agency belonging to Konstantin Malofeev, an unusual Russian digital media lord. Slate magazine made a profile of the man some years ago, while he was still planning to create Tsargrad. Slate grossly exaggerated Malofeev’s proximity and importance to Putin, for he is an outsider, but otherwise it gives you the general idea. Malofeev had been sanctioned by US and EU authorities in 2014, but the account of the media company he was the main owner of was blocked six years later, in the summer of 2020. Tsargrad had over one million subscribers when suddenly, and without warning, YouTube deleted its account. At first, they explained their action by asserting that Tsargrad was “breaking the community rules’, as always. Later on, Google claimed they blocked Tsargrad because its owner had been sanctioned.

The Moscow tribunal rejected both claims. (Read here the tribunal decision in full, English translation comes after Russian version) It stated that Google didn’t prove Tsargrad broke community rules; even had that been the case, Google would have had to give six months’ warning before breaking the contract. As for sanctions, the Tribunal ruled that US and EU sanctions are a part of public law of those particular countries, and cannot be applied in Russia; Google has to restore their account or suffer legal consequences.

The consequences are financial, and exponential. For the first week of non-compliance, Google would have to pay a little over one thousand dollars, nothing to speak about there. But afterwards, the fines double each week, and in half a year’s time Google would have to pay over $70 billion! Exponential fines can be very threatening. Can the Russians make Google pay? Yes! Google (google.ru) has a few billions on their accounts in Russia, all eminently liable to be seized. On the other hand, if Google restores the blocked account, they won’t have to pay a cent. Stories related to this historical decision are filed here (in Russian).

[…]

Dr Eddy Betterman

A Canadian professor has discovered that models that countries used as bases for Wuhan coronavirus lockdowns turned out to be problematic. He found that “a great majority” of these models were built on false assumptions. But some countries still insisted on implementing lockdown mandates grounded on these flawed models – which he found troubling.

Simon Fraser University (SFU) professor Doug Allen said in an interview that these early models “were built on a set of assumptions.” The university’s Burnaby Mountain Professor of Economics continued: “Those assumptions turned out to be really important, and the models are very sensitive to them, and they turn out to be false.”

Allen reviewed more than 80 papers on the effects of lockdowns worldwide. He subsequently compiled his findings in a paper he published in April of this year. Allen then conducted his own cost-benefit analysis based on the “life-years saved” calculation. This calculation determines the number of years of lost life lockdowns would cause compared to the number of years of lost life they would save.

According to his analysis, many of the lockdowns “tended to over-estimate the benefits and under-estimate the costs.” He found that lockdown mandates have caused 282 times more harm than benefit to Canadian society over the long term. Allen’s findings led him to conclude that lockdowns may be among “the greatest peacetime policy failures in Canada’s history.”

The professor added that most of the studies he looked at did not try to distinguish between mandated and voluntary changes in people’s behavior. These just assumed an exponential rise in daily infections until herd immunity is reached. These studies also surmised that government-mandated public health guidelines – such as business closures and restrictions on gatherings – solely caused changes in people’s behavior, he continued.

Allen elaborated that the papers he examined did not consider voluntary behavioral changes people made in response to the pandemic. He said these changes have a major impact on evaluating the merits of a lockdown policy. “Human beings make choices, and we respond to the environment that we’re in. [But] these early models did not take this into account. You don’t need lockdowns to induce people to behave that way.”

Allen lamented politicians’ continued use of these flawed models and the censorship of contrary opinions

The SFU professor noted that places with stringent lockdowns did not see any meaningful reduction in the number of COVID-19 deaths compared to places without lockdowns or with slightly looser ones. He pointed out that many places in Canada still follow the same policies set in place when the pandemic began in March of last year despite his findings.

Allen attributed this continued reliance on lockdowns to politics.

[…]

Via https://dreddymd.com/2021/05/26/canadian-professor-claims-models-that-countries-used-to-justify-coronavirus-lockdowns-are-flawed/

Posted By: Kurt Zindulka via Breitbart

Technology News

Those who took the vaccine had the expectation that they were “free” from government scrutiny and could return to normal life; they were sorely disappointed as they now discover a clandestine surveillance effort to track their every move. ⁃ TN Editor

The British government has been reported to have secretly surveilled the movements of millions of citizens to track changes in behaviour following the administration of coronavirus vaccines.

A report from the SPI-B committee of government scientists has revealed that the government tracked up to ten per cent of the British public’s phones in February, all without permission or notification to the public.

The report, which was seen by the Sunday Telegraph, said that researchers at Oxford University for the SPI-B — a subgroup of the British government’s SAGE quango — monitored the behavioural changes of vaccinated Britons through “CDR [call data records] with corresponding location observations”.

Through tracking “cell phone mobility data for 10 per cent of the British population”, the Oxford University team was able to determine that 4,254 people had received a coronavirus vaccine at the time.

Researchers went to track those individuals through forty “CDR [call data records] with corresponding location observations” daily. They studied the changes in the behaviour of those vaccinated by comparing the week before and the week after the administering of the jab.

The report revealed that “various robustness checks are undertaken by age, distance from home to vaccination point” by the government group, which also studied “gyration (radius of gyration on vaccination day), time (opening hours) and home (do they go home directly after vaccination)”.

Through the behavioural monitoring of vaccinated people compared to a control group, the researchers were able to determine that “average pre-vaccination mobility increased by 218 meters”.

Silkie Carlo, the director of the civil liberties pressure group Big Brother Watch said in response to the report: “No one expects that by going to get a vaccine they will be tracked and monitored by their own Government.

“This is deeply chilling and could be extremely damaging to public trust in medical confidentiality.

“Between looming Covid passports and vaccine phone surveillance, this Government is turning Britain into a Big Brother state under the cover of Covid. This should be a wake-up call to us all.”

[…]

Via https://www.technocracy.news/uk-vaccine-angst-millions-secretly-surveilled-after-taking-shot/

21st Century Wire | May 24, 2021

Since the pandemic crisis began in early 2020, government and public health officials have been adamant that any difficult measures taken were all being done in order to ‘control the spread of the virus’ or ‘stop the disease.’ Thus, a litany of so-called non-pharmaceutical interventions, and also pharmaceutical interventions – were deemed by the consensus to be essential measures in fighting the spread of what was being characterized as an asymptomatic disease.

Over a year later, a few industrious ‘public health’ mavens have summoned the courage to actually test this fundamental assumption. Recently in the UK, officials have staged and monitored nine large-scale events, including an FA Cup final football match, and the Brit Awards – both of which were exempt from the usual COVID rules. The results of this test should be hailed as good news, but for those heavily invested in the narrative, it’s nothing short of a meltdown: little to no coronavirus “cases” turned up.

Officials managed to scrape together just 15 alleged “cases” or “infections” (deemed as such merely from a single ‘positive test’) out of some 60,000 total attendees.

The result of this experiment has dealt a crushing blow to the central myth upon which the entire COVID-19 ‘global pandemic’ crisis has been built – namely the myth of the asymptomatic spread, and the much-maligned notorious “super-spreader” events.

Sky News UK reports…

Nine large-scale events were staged as part of the government’s plan to allow for the return of big crowds this summer. Those who attended were exempt from certain coronavirus rules, such as the rule-of-six.

The government confirmed to Sky News that 15 COVID cases had been recorded out of nearly 60,000 people who attended the events, which “is in line with the broader population”.

Latest figures show the rate of people testing positive for COVID in the UK is 22 infections per 100,000 people.

The pilot events included three football matches at Wembley Stadium – the FA Cup final which was attended by 21,000 supporters, an FA Cup semi-final and the Carabao Cup final.

IMAGE: Animated graphic from NPR’s debunked April 2020 propaganda article entitled, “What We Know About The Silent Spreaders Of COVID-19.”

Combine this latest UK admission with the recent backtracking by Dr. Anthony Fauci and the US Center for Disease Control CDC on masks and asymptomatic transmissions, and it’s clear that officials will have no choice now but to back-off supporting the nonscience-based myth of the asymptomatic spreader or “silent spreaders,” and it’s not difficult to see how problematic this widely held assumption is now becoming, with many media doctors and public health officials now facing challenges over what can only be described as a collective propaganda effort deployed by government, media and medical industry over the last 14 months.

The peer-reviewed literature is also clear, with large-scale studies conducted, including at the supposed epicenter of the pandemic in Wuhan, China – all of which showed no evidence of alleged asymptomatic spreading of the ‘novel’ coronavirus. See their results here, here, and here.

Of course, none of this should surprise any honest doctor or real scientist. We’ve always known that any disease requires symptoms first. But somehow, common sense has been completely abandoned during the Covid crisis.

Of all the widely-held assumptions and hysteria surrounding the COVID crisis, none has been more pivotal than the myth of the ‘asymptomatic spread’ in ballasting every single unprecedented ‘health intervention’ policy including:

• Social Distancing
• Mass Testing
• Reliance on non-diagnostic PCR and Lateral Flow tests
• Track and Trace bio surveillance
• Lockdowns
• Quarantining the healthy
• Masks
• Border Closures
• Business Closures
• School Closures
• Mass Vaccinations
• Vaccine Passports

It’s astonishing to consider that every single one of these emergency measures have been predicated on the widely-held, nonscientific myth of the asymptomatic spread.

[…]