Safe and Effective: A Second Opnion

Oracle Films (2022

Film Review

This is the best Covid19 documentary I have seen so far. Made in the UK, it focuses on the three main vaccines Britain offers (Pfizer, Moderna and Astra Zeneca). All three have produced historically high rates of death and serious injury. At the time of filming, 2,000 vaccine-related deaths had been reported via the Britain’s Yellow Card system and 13,000 to the US VAERS system.

About a third of the film consists of testimonials from vax injured patients. In addition having their careers and lives destroyed, they also face having the National Health Service dismiss their disabling symptoms (usually related to blood clots, chest pain or severe neurological impairment) as “psychological.” Fortunately many of them have found relief through a variety of alternative medical treatments (eg therapeutic phlebotomy,* oxygen therapy and detoxification with gold particles).

British MP Sir Christopher Chope, who accuses the government of covering up vaccine injuries, has introduced a private member’s bill to increase government compensation for vaccine injury from the current one-time payment of £120,000.

The victims featured in the film have formed support groups to help them cope with their vaccine-related disabilities. Many also find the Covid Adverse Reaction Handbook by vaccine-injured author Caroline Plover extremely helpful.

Safe and Effective also features testimonials from doctors and researchers who call for Covid vaccination to be suspended until the drug companies release the raw data from their clinical trials. One points out Pfizer’s unethical claim of 95% effectiveness (its relative effectiveness) for its. Given its absolute effectiveness of only 0.84%, its human trials showed no reduction in Covid deaths and an increase in deaths from other causes.

Another scientist calls Pfizer out for lying about the spike protein remaining in the injection site, when their own research showed that it circulates throughout the blood stream and organs. Moreover both the FDA and Pfizer knew all along that the mRNA vaccines don’t prevent infection or transmission – as well as causing extremely toxic side effects in cancer treatment studies.

The film ends with an examination of the culture of fear used to convince entire populations to accept three experimental vaccines with unproven safety and effectiveness. The principal driver of this psyops, according to filmmakers, was the Nudge Unit of the UK’s Scientific Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE). According to leaked Nudge Unit documents, the harsh lockdowns forbidding people to leave their homes or see friends and family were essential to ramping up this fear.

Safe and Effective is also extremely critical of the BBC and other media outlets for maligning the unvaccinated as “dangerous antivaxers), as well as blacking out anti-mandate protests involving tens of thousands of Brits.

*Therapeutic phlebotomy or blood-letting is a common treatment for diseases associated with iron build up or improperly formed blood cells (eg hemochromatosis, polycythemia vera, and porphyria)

Film can be viewed free at https://www.oraclefilms.com/safeandeffective

By Zachary Stieber

Epoch Times

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) researchers are preparing to publish a study on a set of data that identified four potential issues in elderly persons after COVID-19 vaccination.

The FDA announced in July 2021 that near real-time surveillance detected four potential adverse events of interest (AEI) following receipt of Pfizer’s vaccine.

The agency has given zero updates on the matter since then, until Sept. 30, when a spokesperson said that a study on the surveillance is expected to be published soon.

“The medical record review and statistical analyses have recently been completed, and the overall study results are currently under internal review at FDA,” the spokesperson told The Epoch Times via email. “Release of the study findings is expected later this fall.”

The spokesperson did not respond to a request for more details.

Pfizer did not respond to a request for comment.

In 2021, the FDA said the four potential adverse events of interest were detected by analyzing the health care claims database for Medicare, the government insurance plan that covers people aged 65 and older.

The events were blood clotting in the lungs, insufficient oxygen to the heart, low blood platelet levels, and disseminated intravascular coagulation.

“These four events may not be true safety concerns, and the screening method cannot establish that the vaccine caused these AEI. FDA is sharing the initial findings of this safety study in the spirit of transparency but does not believe there is a cause for concern. There are alternative explanations for the findings, including the fact that the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine was given to many high-risk individuals who were older and had significant co-morbidities,” the FDA said at the time.

“FDA continues to closely monitor the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines and will further investigate these findings by conducting more rigorous epidemiological studies. FDA will share further updates and information with the public as they become available,” it also said.

The adverse events were not identified for recipients of the other two vaccines available at the time, nor were they identified in two other surveillance systems.

FDA Has Warned of Adverse Events

Adverse events are negative health issues that aren’t necessarily linked to a vaccine. The vaccinated groups in the clinical trials for the vaccines had higher numbers of certain adverse events, including Bell’s palsy in Pfizer’s trial, but the FDA said the trials did not reveal safety concerns, citing the background rate of Bell’s palsy in the general population and other factors. Researchers have since identified a higher rate of serious adverse events in the vaccinated arms than the unvaccinated arms.

The FDA did say that post-trial administration of the vaccines in large numbers of people “may reveal additional, potentially less frequent and/or more serious adverse events not detected in the” trials, and in the months following authorization, the FDA added warnings for adverse events to all of the available vaccines.

People set to receive the Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, and Novavax vaccines are told in FDA fact sheets that they could experience a severe allergic reaction. Myocarditis and pericarditis, two forms of heart inflammation, are possible after receipt of the Pfizer, Moderna, and Novavax. Evidence accumulated after the trials shows a causal link between heart inflammation and the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, U.S. health officials have said.

Other side effects that have been reported after receipt of one or more of the vaccines include swollen lymph nodes, skin tingling, blood clots, and diarrhea.

The FDA and other health agencies maintain that the benefits of the vaccines outweigh the risks, a position challenged by many health experts.

Via https://www.theepochtimes.com/exclusive-fda-preparing-to-publish-study-on-4-potential-adverse-events-following-pfizer-vaccination_4768103.html

MOSCOW, Oct 2 (Reuters) – Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak said on Sunday that it was technically possible to restore the ruptured offshore infrastructure of the Nord Stream gas pipelines, TASS news agency reported.

A total of four leaks were discovered last week on the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines in the Baltic Sea near Denmark and Sweden, with a significant fall in gas pressure leading to the detection of the ruptures.

“There have never been such incidents. Of course, there are technical possibilities to restore the infrastructure, it takes time and appropriate funds. I am sure that appropriate possibilities will be found,” Novak said.

Denmark’s Energy Agency said on Sunday it had been informed by Nord Stream AG that stable pressure had been achieved in Nord Stream 1, once the largest single supply route for Russian gas to Europe, indicating the outflow from the last leaks had halted.

Nord Stream AG said on Saturday that gas was no longer flowing out of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, which had held some gas despite never becoming operational.

[…]

Via https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/russian-deputy-pm-says-its-possible-restore-nord-stream-pipelines-tass-2022-10-02/

eugypius

The German government has ordered 100 million doses of BA.1 and BA.4/5 bivalent vaccines at a cost of 2.5 billion Euros, and almost nobody wants them. An amusing Welt article chronicles the scenes unfolding at our deserted regional vaccination centres, which for some reason are still open:

Michael Hubmann did not expect that so few would come. Only 85 people had themselves vaccinated against Covid-19 on Thursday in Fürth in Middle Franconia, a district with 120,000 inhabitants. “We’ve tried to make it as easy as possible for people,” says Hubmann, a paediatrician who is coordinating the vaccination campaign. He explains that vaccinations were offered simultaneously in two shopping centres, a bus, a home for the elderly and in a former shop in the pedestrian zone. “Yet hardly anyone wanted to have the fourth dose.”

The medical bureaucrats are baffled, just baffled:

“Unfortunately, interest in the fourth dose has been pretty low so far,” says Markus Beier, Chairman of the German Association of General Practitioners. At the same time, he says it’s important that people over 60 and those with previous illnesses in particular protect themselves with a further dose. “There is uncertainty among the population as to what further vaccinations will achieve. But they still strengthen protection against severe outcome.”

Meanwhile, vast quantities of vaccine are expiring. At the end of August alone, 3.9 million doses of Moderna and another 700,000 doses of Novavax had to be binned.

The chart above tells the whole sordid story of our recent experiment with mass vaccination. Demand for this snake oil was highest in the beginning, before anybody had any direct experience with it; and in the Fall, when the government tied vaccination to specific social privileges. As overt vaccinator coercion has faded and millions of people have tried these doubtful elixirs for themselves, interest has all but entirely evaporated. This is the ultimate vindication for all those who have been saying that the vaccines are lousy overhyped pharmaceuticals with a bad side-effect profile. A safe and effective product would only gain momentum with the population. It took less than two years for these to wear out their welcome.

Via https://www.eugyppius.com/p/germany-spends-25-billion-euros-on

A Case Report: Multifocal Necrotizing Encephalitis and Myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination against COVID-19

by Michael Mörz

Harvest of Empire: The History of Latinos in America

By Juan Gonzalez

Viking Penguin (2000)

Book Review

Although over 20 years old, this book remains extremely relevant in the face of the continuing immigrant crisis at the Mexican border.

Gonzalez begins by describing the pre-European population of the Americas, which according to most scholars was 60 – 110 million:[1]

• 25 -40 million in modern day Mexico
• 6 – 11 million in the central Andes
• 25 – 40 million North of the Rio Grand

Most historical and archeological evidence reveals the slave-based states of the Aztecs (Mexico), Mayas (Yucatan Peninsula and Guatemala) and Incas (Peruvian highland) were politically and culturally sophisticated as Europe. The population of the Incan city Tenochititlan was 200,000 – 400,000, in contrast to the 50,00 in London and the 40,000 in Seville.

The Mayans, who had the only written language, also had advanced knowledge of math and astronomy.

In North America, only the the Pueblo civilization [2] approached the sophistication of the South and Meso American civilizations. However the Iroquois Confederacy, which stretched from Lake Superior to Virginia, had the most advanced form of government in North America [3]

After a detailed exposition of successive waves of colonists arriving in the Americas over the next four hundred years, Gonzales describes the forcible annexation by the US government of Florida (1802), Texas, California and the Southwest US (1855) and Central America and the Caribbean Basin during the second half of the 19th century. Along with annexation came the inconvenience of several million Mexicans, Cuban, Filipinos and Puerto Ricans living in these territories.

A good number were exterminated; others subdued by systematic terrorism. In the Rio Grande valley, for example, landowning Mexicans were beaten up, lynched and swindled until the 10% Anglo population controlled nearly all the land.

The other really interesting part of the book linking 20th century immigration patterns from various Meso-American and Caribbean Basin countries to growing exploitation and oppression of Central America, Puerto Rico, the Dominican Republic, Cuba and Mexico by Wall Street and the US government.[4]

The book also details the systematic use of Mexican immigrants (by corporations and the government) to suppress American wages. The US government first began recruiting cheap Mexican laborers between 1880 and 1930 to work on railroads and in the fields between. They forcibly deported 1 million of them when unemployment rose  during the Great Depression, even though many were US citizens.

When American men were fighting overseas in 1942, the US started the Bracero Program to recruit new Mexican workers, recruiting as many as 450,000 by 1950. This was followed by Operation Wetback during the 1954 recession, in which they kidnapped and illegally deported 1-2 million Mexicans.

Resurrected when the recession lifted, Bracero ended in 1964 when Lyndon Johnson replaced it with the H-2 Guest Worker Program.

In 1966, US corporations begin moving operations to northern Mexico instead of recruiting Mexican immigrants to cross the border. This trend escalated with the passage by the Clinton administration’s adoption of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1994. The latter has resulted in enormous profits for Wall Street, suppression of wages and job growth on both sides of the border, along with (ironically) a massive increase in the flood of immigrants across the Mexican border.[5]

[1] Following the arrival of European settlers approximately 1 million indigenous Americans died annually (from disease and massacres) for most of the 16th century. The Spanish killed more than the Anglos because the advanced societies of South and Meso-America put up greater resistance.

[2] The Anasazis, from whom the Pueblos were descended, were even more “advanced” when they mysteriously disappeared some time in the 13th century.

[3] The European framers of the US Constitution modeled much of it on the Iroquois Confederacy. However they left out the bit about women controlling the land and choosing new tribal leaders.

[4] Prior to World War II, Central America and Caribbean Basin were de facto colonies of Wall Street corporations, who exploited cheap labor and lax regulation in pursuit of hundreds of millions in profits from sugar, coffee and banana plantations. Strikes and uprisings by local peasants to improve their brutal working conditions resulted in repeated US military invasions and occupations.

[5] Gonzalez blames the shutting down of many Mexican farms owing to their inability to compete with cheap US farm surpluses.

Florida Insurance Companies were already in crisis before Ian. Many Florida property owners are in for a rude shock.

ABC News:

Hurricane Ian could cripple Florida’s already-fragile homeowners insurance market. Experts say a major storm like Ian could push some of those insurance companies into insolvency, making it harder for people to collect on claims.

Since January 2020, at least a dozen insurance companies in the state have gone out of business, including six this year alone. Nearly 30 others are on the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation’s “Watch List” because of financial instability.

“Hurricane Ian will test the financial preparedness of some insurers to cover losses to their portfolios, in particular smaller Florida carriers with high exposure concentrations in the impacted areas,” Jeff Waters, an analyst at Moody’s Analytics subsidiary RMS and a meteorologist, told ABC News. Waters said Florida is a peak catastrophe zone for reinsurers, and those with exposure will likely incur meaningful losses.

Via https://climatecrocks.com/2022/10/01/florida-insurance-companies-were-already-in-crisis-before-ian/