The Most Revolutionary Act

Uncensored updates on world events, economics, the environment and medicine

The Most Revolutionary Act
Unknown's avatar

About stuartbramhall

Retired child and adolescent psychiatrist and American expatriate in New Zealand. In 2002, I made the difficult decision to close my 25-year Seattle practice after 15 years of covert FBI harassment. I describe the unrelenting phone harassment, illegal break-ins and six attempts on my life in my 2010 book The Most Revolutionary Act: Memoir of an American Refugee.

Switzerland’s Vaccine Surplus: As Elsewhere, People Quietly Rejecting Them

Brian Peckford

Switzerland, home to less than 9 million people, is one of the biggest mRNA vaccine customers in the world relative to population. They’ve already received a staggering 33 million Covid vaccine doses, only a little over half of which were ever administered. The small country is now sitting on 13.5 million doses, nervously awaiting the delivery of a further 2 million in the coming weeks, and surely lamenting that 11.6 million more are scheduled to arrive by the end of 2023. The vast majority of these will sit for some months in freezers before the Swiss Confederation destroys them. The country already binned more than eleven million doses last year, the greater part of them after a deal to supply surplus snake oil to the third world via the failed Covax initiative fell through because nobody in Africa wants this stuff either.

Vaccine credulity may still be the mainstream, politically acceptable position, but revealed preferences show that enormous majorities everywhere are done with mass vaccination. Pharmaceutical executives can sing their doubtful hymns to the miraculous safety and efficacy of their jabs, but the quiet worldwide rejection of their pharmaceutical garbage is a stinging rebuke, suggesting that billions of people across the world harbour unexpressed scepticism towards these products.

[…]

Via https://peckford42.wordpress.com/2023/01/09/switzerland-has-a-surplus-of-covid-vaccines-like-many-countries-the-people-are-quietly-rejecting-them/

 

The Plan to Intentionally Suppress Early Treatment to Promote Mass Inoculation

Tales from the Conspiratum

Via https://talesfromtheloublog.wordpress.com/2023/01/08/dr-mccullough-there-was-a-plan-to-intentionally-suppress-early-treatment-to-promote-mass-inoculation/

Cruelty is Not Public Health

Helen T

Alice Springs to Mind

I don’t know what this is called. It is clearly caused by damage to the nervous system. There are two New Zealanders that I know of who developed this condition after taking a mandated pharmaceutical product sold as a “vaccine”. Their conditions are not improving (Casey Hodgkinson; Rob Martin). There are others with milder forms of the same condition and many with other conditions.

This mother developed her symptoms one week after a Pfizer Covid-19 inoculation. She is unable to walk and cannot feed her child.

Cruelty is not public health. Something is very wrong.

NZDSOS have written numerous letters to police, politicians, coroners and other authorities, requesting an investigation. Their requests continue to be persistently ignored and NZDSOS, a group of hundreds including medical generalists, medical specialists, scientists and public health professionals, continue to be attacked as “fringe”. They stand with other “fringe” professionals against what appears quite clearly, to be a criminal cartel who need anyone not supporting their bizarre demands on society, to be silenced.

Australia is full of “mainstream scientists” following along with this. Is their narcissism more important than the fundamental rights of everyone else? Meet Professor Deborah Lupton, a sociologist at UNSW who wants the world to believe that three of the world’s most esteemed infectious disease epidemiologists who met at their own expense in October 2020 to write a very standard public health declaration, did so with “dark money”. As per standard strategy, what she accuses others of is apparently a deflection of reality…

Epigenetics Exposes Darwinian Biology as a Religion – Your DNA Does NOT Determine Your Health!

https://healthimpactnews.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/01/epigenetics-1536x842.png

Image source

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

Darwinian biology has shaped the field of “science” for nearly two centuries now. However, Darwin’s theories of life and origins have undergone many revisions and updates over the years as scientific discovery brings to light new truths that challenge many of Darwin’s presuppositions.

DNA, for example, is a system of classification that was unknown during Darwin’s time, and many of the tenets of DNA have presented problems for Darwin’s theories.

In recent years, the whole field of “epigenetics” has proven that we are not the sum total of our “DNA blueprint.” In fact, the growing field of epigenetics completely contradicts the tenets of Darwinian biology according to biophysicist Dr. Cornelius G. Hunter.

Cornelius G. Hunter is a graduate of the University of Illinois where he earned a Ph.D. in Biophysics and Computational Biology. He is Adjunct Professor at Biola University and author of the award-winning Darwin’s God: Evolution and the Problem of Evil. He writes:

Epigenetics (epi means “above” genetics) is a term given to mechanisms that do not alter genes in our DNA, but rather turn genes off or on (or influence whether they are turned off or on). Epigenetic mechanisms are complicated and enable organisms to adapt intelligently and rapidly to challenging environments.

Here is one reason this contradicts evolutionary theory: the adaptation arises immediately, in direct response to the challenge. Not blindly. Not by random mutation. Not by natural selection.

Epigenetic mechanisms are ubiquitous in biology, and extremely important. Because of epigenetics, organisms with otherwise identical genes (e.g., twins) can be quite different.

[…]

Via https://healthimpactnews.com/2023/epigenetics-exposes-darwinian-biology-as-a-religion-your-dna-does-not-determine-your-health/

Swiss Organization to Provide People With SAFE Blood Transfusions From UNVAXXED Purebloods

Posted BY: Arsenio Toledo | Natural News

NWO Report

An organization in Switzerland called Safe Blood Donation has been set up to provide people all over the world with safe blood transfusions exclusively from people who remain unvaccinated against the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19). Members also urged to ‘make themselves available as blood donors’ for other people looking for unvaccinated blood transfusions

The organization was founded in late 2022 by Swiss naturopath George Della Pietra. According to the group’s website, the group’s goal is to provide people all over the world with a way to receive life-saving blood transfusions while refusing to take the vaccines developed against COVID-19.

“Be it an emergency, a scheduled operation, or because you need regular transfusions for other medical reasons. This is where Safe Blood Donation comes into play as an intermediary,” reads a statement on the organization’s website.

The group will essentially act as a middleman to connect people all over the world with medical partners who are willing to accept blood donations and provide blood transfusions to people with health needs but are hesitant to go to hospitals where they will almost certainly receive blood from vaccinated individuals.

Della Pietra created his organization due to the release of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines causing disputes all over the world over blood treatments and transfusions. Specifically, people who are skeptical of the benefits that come with taking the experimental vaccines and don’t want their bodies tainted by the unsafe products.

[…]

Via https://nworeport.me/2023/01/07/swiss-organization-to-provide-people-with-safe-blood-transfusions-from-unvaxxed-purebloods/

Simplifying and Un-Silencing Science

Alice Springs to Mind

Evolutionary biologist Dr Bret Weinstein explained to Joe Rogan, findings in a recent study published in Science Immunology. Researchers found increased levels of an antibody called IgG4 in the blood of people who received 2 or more doses of mRNA vaccine coding for spike protein. This antibody encourages tolerance to the spike protein rather than capacity to attack it. This makes the individual less able to fight off a Covid infection. They also found these people had reduced antibody-mediated phagocytic activity, meaning a reduced capacity to fight infections in general.

This is the immune suppression that silenced scientists have been warning about since this vaccination program was first mentioned by the powerful vested interests forcing this upon the world. It is now being seen in real world data, despite attempts to obscure the information from public knowledge.

A recent study in Utah, USA: Triple Vaccinated More Likely Than Unvaccinated To Get Symptomatic COVID-19; another recent study in Ohio, USA: Effectiveness of the Covid-19 Bivalent Vaccine, in which over 50,000 personnel demonstrated that the more doses a person had, the more likely they were to contract Covid (and the vaccine’s usefulness in preventing severe disease was unable to be ascertained as severe disease was not observed); and above example from the weekly Covid-19 report of 31 December 2022, by NSW Health, Australia.

Robert F Kennedy Jr gave this excellent interview with Steve Kirsch recently (starts at the 5 minute mark, and finishes at 60m). They spoke about censorship, which does not kill ideas but does foster resentment in those who are silenced.

The detailed knowledge Kennedy shares of the incredible levels of scientific fraud and criminality within agencies following specific agendas would, in normal times be an atrocious scandal. But mainstream media, funded by vested interests, provide an echo chamber to the world of one perspective, protecting humanity’s worst.

For twenty years Kennedy has sought discourse on issues of vaccine safety. Kirsch has found a reputable vaccinologist willing to debate Kennedy in public, and plans are underway to make it happen.

[…]

How Romans Engineered Their Aqueducts

Roman aqueducts: main elements

Lecture 13 Engineering a Roman Aqueduct

Understanding Greek and Roman Technology: From the Catapult to the Pantheon

Dr Stephen Ressler (2013)

Film Review

Ressler uses a scale model to demonstrate how an aqueduct relies on gravity and a slight downward gradient (averaging between 0.15 and 0.3% to produce a continuous flow of water. Allowing water to flow too fast eroded the aqueduct’s concrete channels. By the 3rd century AD, Rome was served by 11 aqueducts, delivering 300 million gallons of water per day.* A few of them carried river water, which tasted so foul it was only suitable for irrigation.

In drilling springs to source their aqueducts, Roman engineers chose a hillside where vegetation (eg bull rush and ivy) suggesting the aquifer (water table) was close to the surface. After installing a settling tank (to remove silt, sand and other debris) between the spring and the aqueduct, they used a corobate to measure gradient and develop a terrain profile.

Measurement of height differences using chorobate device | Download Scientific Diagram

The aqueduct itself was a concrete trough coated with a a lime and crushed brick mortar polished to a glass-like finish. This was covered by a concrete vault (interrupted with regular inspection shafts) to reduce evaporation and keep out foreign matter.

Wherever possibly they routed the aqueduct through underground trenches.

Where the gradient had to be raised (to achieve continuous flow) six feet or less, they used a solid stone or brick faced embankment called a substractio.

Roman aqueducts examples

If it was between 6 and 70 feet, their used either a bridge or an inverted siphon made up of multiple parallel pipes.

Where it had to be raised 70 feet or more they used two or three tiered arcades to support the water channel. The use of multiple tiers shortened the arches and made them less susceptible to buckling. They only used tunneling as a lost resort. The longest Roman tunnel, 1.4 miles long, was built in 312 BC.

How to Take a Day Trip to Segovia from Madrid, Spain


*New York City didn’t achieve this capacity until the 20th century.

Film can be viewed free with a library card on Kanopy.

https://www.kanopy.com/en/pukeariki/watch/video/146678/146704

Pentagon Rescinds COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate

U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin speaks during a meeting with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi at the Pentagon in Washington on Dec. 14, 2022. (Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images)

U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin speaks during a meeting with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi at the Pentagon in Washington on Dec. 14, 2022. (Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images)

Zachary Stieber

Epoch Times

 

The U.S. Department of Defense has withdrawn its COVID-19 vaccine mandate, a Pentagon official said on Jan. 5.

“We have rescinded the mandate,” Brig. Gen. Pat Ryder told reporters during a briefing.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, a Biden appointee, imposed the mandate for all troops in August 2021, saying it was necessary to protect military readiness. The military had kept the mandate, which was for a primary series of a vaccine, in place even as the initial shots have proven increasingly less effective against infection and severe illness.

Even some of the original backers of the requirement, such as House Armed Services Chairman Adam Smith (D-Wash.), said the mandate no longer made sense in light of such developments, and Congress inserted a provision into the 2023 defense funding bill that required Austin to rescind the mandate within 30 days of its enactment.

President Joe Biden signed the bill on Dec. 23, 2022. That same day, the Pentagon said it was halting all actions related to the mandate but that it had not yet withdrawn it.

Ryder told reporters Thursday that the military is in the process of developing “further guidance” on vaccines for the force after the withdrawal of the vaccination requirements.

“While that process takes place, we paused all actions related to the COVID-19 vaccine mandate. So, we’ll be sure to keep members of the force, we’ll keep you, and keep the public updated, as we have new information available to provide,” Ryder said.

“I will say that we will continue to encourage all of our service members, civilian employees, and our contractor personnel to get vaccinated and boosted to ensure the readiness of our force. And as we’ve said, as I’ve said, the health and readiness of our force will continue to be crucial to our ability to defend the nation,” he added.

As of late 2022, nearly 8,500 troops had been discharged for refusing to get a COVID-19 vaccine.

The military has notoriously issued mass rejections for religious requests for exemptions to the mandate, triggering multiple court challenges. Judges had blocked three of the four branches from discharging most members seeking religious exemptions due to the treatment, which the judges said violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

Just 0.5 percent of the religious accommodation requests have been approved by the Marines, followed by 1 percent for the Navy, 2.3 percent for the Air Force, and 6 percent for the Army. Thousands of requests were still not adjudicated before the mandate was withdrawn.

Mat Staver, chairman of Liberty Counsel, which is representing members in some of the cases, celebrated the withdrawal of the mandate but said that the legal group would continue pursuing the litigation.

“While we are pleased that Joe Biden’s unlawful and abusive COVID shot mandate will be rescinded, this begrudging reversal under pressure by Congress is not enough,” Staver said in a statement.

He pointed to a Pentagon memorandum (pdf) that stated service members who applied for religious accommodation would have any adverse action taken in response remain in their files.

“The Department of Defense and the military branches have taken the position that any service member who requested a religious accommodation was disrupting good order and discipline. Astoundingly, those who defend the Constitution and the laws of the land are considered insubordinate when they request that the laws for which they pledge their lives be upheld. This is the twisted world under the Biden administration,” Staver said.

“Our legal case will continue because without the injunctions, service members will continue to face retaliation for requesting a religious accommodation. Service members who have been loyal to the country and faithful to their religious convictions have suffered greatly under this mandate, and we will continue to seek justice for them,” he said.

Applies to National Guard?

The Army has taken the position that the defense funding bill does not apply to the National Guard, according to a recent memorandum.

Austin’s original mandate was for all troops, but he issued a second, supplemental directive in November 2021 that made clear all members of the National Guard must be vaccinated by deadlines set by the Army or Air Force or they would be unable to participate in drills, training, and other duty.

Austin also said that the Pentagon could not fund duties performed by Guard members who did not get vaccinated.

The Army’s memo says that the funding bill’s forced withdrawal of the mandate “does not address” the latter directive “for members of the national guard and ready reserve.”

It ordered commanders to keep adhering to the directive until it is “superseded or rescinded” by Austin.

[…]

 

Top HHS Official Blocked Release of Long-Delayed Fluoride Toxicity Review

Newly released emails reveal that leadership within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Institutes of Health acted to prevent the release of long-delayed review of fluoride’s toxicity by the National Toxicology Program.

The emails specifically claim that Assistant Secretary for Health Rachel Levine intervened to stop the release of the NTP review, also known internally as a monograph.

An email dated June 3, 2022, shows Nicole Johnson, associate director for policy, partnerships and strategic communication in CDC’s Oral Health Division contacting Jennifer Greaser, a senior public health policy analyst in CDC’s Washington office.

Johnson states:

“The latest we heard (yesterday) is that ASH Levine has put the report on hold until further notice.”

ASH Levine refers to the U.S. Assistant Secretary of Health, Rachel Levine.

The emails were released as part of the ongoing legal dispute between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and plaintiffs Food & Water Watch, the Fluoride Action Network and others who are seeking an end to water fluoridation.

Throughout the historic lawsuit, the plaintiffs have argued that the practice violates the EPA’s Toxic Substances Abuse Act.

Hearings for the lawsuit began in June 2020 but were delayed for more than two years after U.S. District Court Judge Edward Chen put the proceedings on hold pending the release of the NTP’s review of all of the available research on fluoride.

The NTP had previously claimed the review would be available in May 2022. However, the review has not been made public and hearings have been delayed and rescheduled as the judge awaited the NTP’s conclusions.

In late October 2022, Judge Chen ended the two-year stay on the lawsuit when he ruled that the NTP review could be viewed in its unpublished form to better inform his final decision. However, due to concerns from the EPA, Judge Chen ruled that the report could not be made public unless the NTP releases it.

On Dec. 14, 2022, the plaintiffs filed several exhibits with Judge Chen, including a redacted version of the NTP’s assessment of fluoride’s neurotoxicity and internal emails between the CDC and the NTP which were obtained via Freedom of Information Act requests.

What do the #FluorideEmails reveal?

Michael Connett, attorney for the plaintiffs, outlined the findings of the emails in several exhibits submitted to Judge Chen. “These emails confirm that the NTP considered the May 2022 monograph to be the NTP’s final report,” Connett writes.

[…]

Jay Sanders, education & outreach director with the Fluoride Action Network, told The Last American Vagabond he believes the emails “reveal a concerted effort at the highest level of the U.S. public health bureaucracy to squash a key report on fluoride neurotoxicity.”

Sanders also stated the emails “show the lengths these agencies are willing to go to to protect their pet project, fluoridation, from any scientific scrutiny.”

Together with the June 3, 2022, email, these communications point to direct intervention from the head of the NIH and the assistant secretary for Health at the Department of Health and Human Services.

The emails confirm what has long been suspected. Namely, that government officials at some level were preventing the release of this important review on the toxicity of fluoride.

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fluoride-toxicity-drinking-water/

2 of 5 Kids have Multiple Food Allergies – Childhood Vaccines Implicated

Two in five U.S. children and nearly half of adults with a food allergy are allergic to multiple foods, according to new research which also found that as the number of food allergies a person has increases, so does the effect on their physical and psychological health. Recent research by Brian S. Hooker, Ph.D., P.E., CHD’s chief scientific officer, found that fully vaccinated children were 4.31 times more likely to suffer from serious allergies (requiring an epi-pen) compared to their unvaccinated counterparts.

The researchers, led by Northwestern University’s Christopher Warren, Ph.D., also found that as the number of food allergies a person has increases, so does the effect on their physical and psychological health.

[…]

Food allergies are part of a chronic and growing public health epidemic in the U.S., afflicting 32 million Americans, including 5.6 million children under age 18.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that allergy prevalence rose by approximately 50% between 1997 and 2011.

Between 1997 and 2008, the prevalence of peanut or tree nut allergy appears to have more than tripled among U.S. children.

[…]

Food allergies and vaccines: What’s the connection?

In a recent episode of VSRF (Vaccine Safety Research Foundation) weekly update, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Children’s Health Defense (CHD) chairman and chief litigation counsel, and VSRF founder Steve Kirsch discussed the relationship between the explosion of food allergies over the last five decades and childhood vaccination.

According to Kennedy, in 1968, the rate of chronic disease in the U.S. was 6% among children. By 1986, that had risen to 11.8% and by 2006, it was up to 54%. That means that more than half of U.S. children have neurological diseases (ADHD, autism, etc.), obesity, autoimmune disease and allergic diseases.

“All of this appeared in epidemic form suddenly in 1989,” Kennedy said. These chronic health conditions existed prior to that, but the numbers started soaring in 1989.

As a founder of the Food Allergy Initiative, now the Food Allergy Research and Education network, which raised more than $200 million for allergy research, Kennedy explained that most research focused on treating allergies rather than understanding their causes.

These treatments, he said, are developed by inducing allergies in lab rats. Researchers inject rats with aluminum adjuvants from the hepatitis vaccine, along with the protein for the given allergen being studied.

The aluminum “does not just give you allergies to materials that are in that vaccine, it will give you an allergy to materials that are in the ambient environment,” Kennedy explained. “So if you get that vaccine when there is a Timothy weed outbreak, you may now have a lifetime allergy to Timothy weed.”

Recent research by Brian S. Hooker, Ph.D., P.E., CHD’s chief scientific officer, found that fully vaccinated children were 4.31 times more likely to suffer from serious allergies (requiring an epi-pen) compared to their unvaccinated counterparts.

Hooker’s findings affirmed research by Anthony Mawson, M.A., doctor of public health, an epidemiologist and professor at Jackson State University, which showed a 3.9-time increase in allergies reported among vaccinated children versus unvaccinated children.

According to Kennedy, there are hundreds of studies with similar outcomes. “We created an entire generation of all these allergies by giving them these early vaccines.”

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/food-allergies-kids-mental-physical-health/