The Most Revolutionary Act

Uncensored updates on world events, economics, the environment and medicine

The Most Revolutionary Act
Unknown's avatar

About stuartbramhall

Retired child and adolescent psychiatrist and American expatriate in New Zealand. In 2002, I made the difficult decision to close my 25-year Seattle practice after 15 years of covert FBI harassment. I describe the unrelenting phone harassment, illegal break-ins and six attempts on my life in my 2010 book The Most Revolutionary Act: Memoir of an American Refugee.

Pfizer Exec Admits Employees Got Private Batch of COVID Shots

By  Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.

During Monday’s episode of “The Kim Iversen Show,” journalist and political commentator Kim Iversen played video clips of visibly outraged Australian senators grilling Pfizer executives who appeared to evade questions about COVID-19 vaccine safety and efficacy.

During a hearing held last week in the Australian Senate, Pfizer executives admitted Australia-based staff were provided a separate, private batch of the COVID-19 vaccine. They also conceded they don’t know why the vaccines cause myocarditis and pericarditis.

Pfizer Australia and New Zealand’s country medical director, Dr. Krishan Thiru, and head of regulatory sciences, Dr. Brian Hewitt, appeared before the Education and Employment Legislation Committee, which is investigating the COVID-19 vaccine rollout as part of the Australian parliamentary inquiry.

During Monday’s episode of “The Kim Iversen Show,” journalist and political commentator Kim Iversen played video clips of visibly outraged senators grilling the Pfizer executives — who often provided evasive answers — about issues related to the vaccine rollout.

In one clip, Senator Matthew Canavan asked repeatedly if Pfizer tested whether or not the vaccine could stop or reduce transmission prior to the vaccine rollout in 2020.

Thiru responded by doubling down on claims that the vaccine is “safe and effective.”

“Senator, as with all vaccines seeking regulatory authorization, the requirement is to demonstrate in robust clinical programs that the vaccine is safe and effective in preventing the infection and in this case in preventing severe disease and hospitalization,” he said.

Thiru refused to provide a “yes or no” response to Canavan’s repeated probes.

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, in late 2020 said the pharma giant was “not certain” if those who receive its mRNA vaccine will be able to transmit COVID-19 to other people.

But in January 2021, Pfizer was promoting the idea that the vaccines stopped transmission. Chief Nerd retweeted Pfizer’s 2021 Tweet:

Chlorine dioxide proven to kill hospital superbugs, including MRSA

Chlorine dioxide proven to kill hospital superbugs, including MRSA
By Dr Eddy Betterman

The Journal of Bacteriology & Mycology: Open Access published a study recently that highlights the efficacy of chlorine dioxide in eradicating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a common hospital “superbug.”

George Georgiou, a researcher from the Da Vinci BioSciences Research Centre in Cyprus, set out to determine new methods of fighting MRSA, which kills at least 50,000 people every year in the United States and Europe alone.

More than 10 percent of all bloodstream Staphylococcus aureus infections are caused by MRSA, Georgiou found, while several countries are seeing closer to 50 percent being caused by MRSA – and antibiotic-resistant strains of Staph only continue to rise right alongside antibiotic overuse and over-prescription.

It is becoming increasingly more difficult to treat infections using standard antibiotics precisely because superbugs are on the rise. The good news is that chlorine dioxide, a natural dietary supplement, is highly effective at destroying MRSA, and likely many other such superbugs.

“The compound chlorine dioxide (ClO2), now commercially important, is not a recent discovery,” Georgiou explains in his paper.

“The gas was first produced by Humphrey Davy in 1811 when reacting hydrochloric acid with potassium chlorate. This yielded ‘euchlorine,’ as it was then termed. Watt and Burgess, who invented alkaline pulp bleaching in 1834, mentioned euchlorine as a bleaching agent in their first patent.”

(Related: Researchers out of Pakistan found that adding chlorine dioxide to chicken feed produced healthier birds with no gut problems – and healed birds that already had gut problems.)

Chlorine dioxide is also powerfully effective against malaria and HIV

For a while, chlorine dioxide was mistakenly referred to as “bleach,” only to later be dubbed a “disinfectant.” It turns out that as a supplement, chlorine dioxide is bactericidal, virucidal, sporicidal, cysticidal, algicidal, and fungicidal – and the best part is that chlorine dioxide is safe, effective, and drug-free.

“It has been reported that chlorine dioxide, a strong oxidant, can inhibit or destroy microorganisms at concentrations ranging from 1 to 100 ppm which produced potent antiviral activity, inactivating > or = 99.9% of the viruses with a 15-sec treatment for sensitization,” Georgiou’s paper explains.

“Moreover, ClO2 can remove biofilms swiftly because it is highly soluble in water and unlike ozone, it does not react with the extracellular polysaccharides of the biofilm. This way ClO2 can penetrate biofilms rapidly to reach and kill the microbes living within the film – a huge advantage that is different to tackle for both Natural and Allopathic Medicine.”

In tests involving MRSA, Georgiou applied varying concentrations of MMS (miracle mineral supplement), as ClO2 is also called, to an MRSA solution for different time periods ranging from 30 seconds all the way to 30 minutes. The lowest concentration was 0.5 ppm for 30 seconds all the way up to 5 ppm for 30 minutes.

In all of the experiments, the ClO2 solution at all concentrations effectively inhibited the growth of MRSA by 99.99 percent.

“In these in vitro experiments, the efficacy of chlorine dioxide against MRSA has been shown consistently, with growth inhibition of 99.99% – 100% in even the smallest concentrations of 0.5 ppm,” the paper explains, adding that this is an incredible outcome considering the versatility and unpredictability of MRSA, which has a propensity to mutate its way out of being destroyed by traditional therapeutics.

“Given the proven safety of chlorine dioxide in animal and human experiments to date, there is an urgent need for high-quality clinical trials to determine the efficacy of chlorine dioxide with individuals infected with MRSA today.”

The paper also revealed that chlorine dioxide is being used to eradicate all sorts of other serious illnesses such as malaria and HIV, with plenty of anecdotal evidence to suggest that it works really well for such purposes, especially when nothing else does.

[…]

Via https://dreddymd.com/2023/08/07/chlorine-dioxide-proven-to-kill-hospital-superbugs-including-mrsa/

Will Insurance Costs Derail the EV Revolution?

https://assets.realclear.com/images/62/621512.jpg

Duggan Flanakin

Real Clear Wire

Four hundred ninety-eight electric vehicles (EVs) and over 3,200 other vehicles, including 350 Mercedes Benzes, were bound for Egypt on the Fremantle Highway when one or more of the EVs caught fire, costing at least one seaman his life and injuring several others. Curiously, the Dutch coast guard had initially reported that only 25 of the vehicles were battery-electric models.

At last report, the Dutch coast guard admitted that it has been unable to put out the fire and that the ship has taken on water and is “listing” and on a trajectory toward a capsize. Should the ship sink, the total loss would also threaten the Frisian island of Ameland, part of a UNESCO World Heritage Site that is home to over 10,000 aquatic and terrestrial species and located near one of the world’s most important migratory-bird habitats.

On a global scale, of course, 3,000 vehicles are but a drop in the bucket, and in insurance terms, the loss of one 18,500–ton transport ship and one human life (all the wounded are expected to survive, despite broken bones, burns, and respiratory problems) is only so much. To compute a total cost, the ecological devastation would also have to be factored in, along with the cost of rescue, firefighting, and salvage operations.

But all in all, this was a freak accident, a one-off. This stuff never happens. Right?

Actually, it does. Just a year ago, the “Felicity Ace” sank as it was being towed from the site where 13 days earlier a fire had broken out on board. That ship, too, was transporting EVs and internal-combustion vehicles – including 15 Lamborghini Aventador LP 780-4 Ultimae supercars valued at half a million dollars apiece. Also lost were 1,117 Porches, 1,944 Audis, 561 Volkswagens, 189 Bentleys, and 70 other Lamborghinis.

And just a month ago, two firefighters died battling flames that broke out on another roll-on, roll-off (RORO) cargo ship docked at Port Newark in New Jersey. Firefighters arrived at the scene when just five to seven vehicles on the 10th floor of the ship were on fire, but the fire quickly spread to the 11th and 12th floors.

One commenter explained that on a RORO ship, vehicles are chain-shackled on all four wheels to the deck, creating trip hazards for firefighters. There are multiple decks, ramps, ladders, confined spaces, low overhead, and solid metal all around (like a gigantic oven). Fighting such fires is a very dangerous challenge, even if the deck plan of the ship is well known.

The port authority assured reporters that no EVs numbered among the 5,000 vehicles (bound for Africa) on board, but just imagine if the fire had begun with the ship far out at sea. Or imagine the horror should an EV fire break out on a ferry boat carrying hundreds of vehicles and thousands of passengers? Or in an underground parking garage in a New York high-rise?

Olivia Murray notes that automakers have largely replaced steel and metal with plastic, and that a huge fire could unleash immeasurable quantities of synthetic chemicals into the atmosphere from the burning plastic. A total capsize would send millions of pounds of debris and spilled motor oil (from the non-EV autos) to the sea floor along with any toxic flame retardants. The impact on sensitive marine life would not be known for years.

Even at $80,000 per vehicle (a low number, perhaps), the insurance loss for the nearly 4,000 vehicles on the “Felicity Ace” alone would be $320 million – and this does not include the loss to end-buyers of the opportunity to drive a vehicle that they may have already purchased.

But massive fires are not the only insurance concern with EVs. The New York Times recently reported the sad story of a Rivian owner whose electric pickup truck was involved in what would normally be considered “a minor fender bender.” The owner’s insurance company gladly offered to pay about $1,600 for the repairs, but the certified repair shop produced a bill for $42,000 – about half the cost of the vehicle.

The Times reporter explained: “A key reason is that the accident damaged a sleek panel that extends from the truck’s rear to front roof pillars.” To repair and repaint the vehicle, mechanics had to remove the interior ceiling material (the headliner) and the front windshield. Indeed, the State of New York’s consumer guide for auto insurance lists many models as “difficult-to-insure vehicles” simply because they are electric.

But that’s still better than the news reported in March that insurance companies are having to write off EVs with just a few miles – leading to higher premiums – because of the many EVs for which there is no way to repair or assess even slightly damaged battery packs after accidents. EV battery packs are ending up in junkyards in multiple countries.

According to the Agent Support Network of America, the intense impact of a crash can be much more devastating to EVs, increasing the likelihood of a totaled versus repairable car. EVs, according to Consumer Reports, may not withstand an accident as well as traditional gasoline-powered vehicles. EV batteries are vulnerable to damage, and with any indication of a compromised battery, insurance companies will likely declare an EV crash a total loss.

An overlooked insurance cost for EVs involves towing, which many insurance customers (and AAA members) take for granted as an inexpensive add-on to their policies. But EVs can be safely towed only on a flatbed truck with enough load capacity to handle the extra weight of the vehicle. Drivers are warned not to allow anyone to try to tow their EV with its wheels on the ground. Improper towing can damage, even total, the vehicle.

The higher costs for auto insurance only add to the already-higher costs of purchasing an EV, then procuring a personal charging station and spending more money to upgrade home wiring boxes (especially for older homes). The inconvenience of having your nearly new vehicle totaled – and then having to wait perhaps months for a replacement – further adds to the “buyer avoidance” that has frustrated those who demand an immediate end to the traditional gasoline-powered vehicles that most people around the world rely upon.

As automakers continue to lose money on EVs and consumers worldwide continue to prefer the vehicles they have learned to trust over decades, will EV mandates fall by the wayside – or will elites again double down, believing that “resistance is futile”?

[…]

Via https://realclearwire.com/articles/2023/08/02/will_insurance_costs_derail_the_ev_revolution_970320.html

India’s 1857 Peoples Rebellion

Episode 25 Issues and Events of 1857

A History of India

Michael Fisher (2016)

The British call the rebellion of 1857 the Sepoy Rebellion. Indians refer to it as the Peoples Uprising.

As of 1857, the British East India Company had three separate armies controlling India’s British-occupied territories. The largest was in Bengal. The two smaller armies in Bombay and Madras weren’t involved in the uprising. Altogether 250,000 of the Company’s troops were Indian mercenaries (aka sepoys) and 40,000 were European.

The Bengal army consisted of high caste Brahmins whose family owned farms, rajputs (jati consisting of traditional warriors and kings) and Muslim light cavalry. All came from families who had served as mercenaries for the Mughal empire.

Some of their grievances against their British officers included

  1. their inability to be promoted beyond the rank of petty officer or command white soldiers
  2. the exclusion of mixed race Indians from the officer corps
  3. a recent pay reduction
  4. lack of respect from white officers
  5. mandatory attendance at Christian services
  6. a ban on displaying symbols of their own religion while in uniform
  7. mandatory service in foreign territories despite Hindu taboos against traveling outside India
  8. higher taxes on their farms following annexation by the British East India Company
  9. loss of earlier privileges.

It would be the newly annexed territories that led the revolt. One example was Jhansi (in Deccan), where Rani Lakshmi Bai, the consort of a deceased rajput, whose territory was annexed when the British East India Company refused to acknowledge their son as his rightful heir. She led the successful defense of Jhansi against Company troops.

Rani Lakshmibai - The Fiery Queen of Jhansi from 1854-1858

Another leading center of revolt was Awadh, which was annexed for “misgovernment” after the the kingdom loaned the British East India Company large sums of money they never repaid.

The uprising started in Meerut after the Bengal Army’s Third Light Cavalry rose up against their British officers. Its Hindu and Muslim members were being imprisoned or executed for refusing orders to bite open the paper gunpowder cartridges used to load their Enfield rifles.*

After liberating Meerut in May 1857, the rebels marched to Delhi to liberate the deposed king of the Red City (who was in prison) and restore him to his throne. On the way, they looted prisons, treasuries, post offices, telegraph offices and officers quarters. May disgruntled landlords and other civilians joined the rebellion.

In Bengal, Company officers intercepted armies on their way to China and marched them up the Ganges. After a month, they retook Banaras and Allahabad. They recaptured Delhi by September 1857 and Lucknow by early 1858. Gwalior and Jansi (in Deccan) weren’t liberated until June.

Immediately following the uprising, the British Parliament ended the British East India Company’s authority to govern in India and put all their troops under the direct command of the British monarch and transferred political control to the British-run Indian Civil Service. Britain simultaneously guaranteed the sovereignty of all princely states that didn’t rebel, which survived until Indian independence in 1947.

Technically that meant one quarter of the Indian population didn’t live under British rule. The largest independent principality was Hyderabad (the size of France). Despite their nominal independence the nawabs who ruled these “independent” states were supervised by British agents and could be deposed if they failed to implement British policies.


*Their British officers refused to identify the source of the grease used on the paper cartridges they had to put in their mouths. Pork fat would have defiled Muslims, while either beef or pork fat were an abomination to Hindus.

Film can be viewed free with a library card on Kanopy.

https://www.kanopy.com/en/pukeariki/watch/video/366254/366221

Yes, Ecosystems Are Collapsing. No It Has Nothing to Do with CO2

By  Josh Mitteldorf, Ph.D.

Fossil fuels are far from harmless, but excessively focusing attention on CO2 emissions overlooks more pressing issues like ecosystem destruction and clandestine weather manipulation.

Another physicist, Freeman Dyson, who was a personal hero of mine has expressed similar views.

This is a big subject, and I don’t feel engaged enough with the issue to write a book on climate, but I will say a few things about which I feel pretty certain — but to which Right Thinking People may take exception.

  1. Global ecosystems are indeed in crisis, and this is the result of human activity.
  2. Greenhouse gasses, CO2 and climate change are peripheral to this story. The net effect of CO2 emission is likely to be beneficial, if at all relevant.
  3. Environmental activism may be the most important movement on the planet today, and its diversion into a narrow focus on carbon is dangerous.
  4. Weather manipulation is a well-developed, sophisticated science being practiced on a global scale, without open scientific backing and without democratic consent. This, too, is a crime and a major danger.

1. Ecosystem collapse

Elizabeth Kolbert’s book, “The Sixth Extinction,” is the best single guide to what is at stake. Species are disappearing at a rate that has only been rivaled five previous times in the 4-billion-year history of life on Earth. These are seminal events, changing the face of the Earth and the nature of life. The most recent extinction (the fifth) was the disappearance of the dinosaurs, 65 million years ago.

We know just enough to realize that ecosystems are complex and interdependent in more ways than we can understand. Ecosystems are robust, and the loss or replacement of a few species triggers adaptations so that the ecosystem continues in a new equilibrium. But ecosystems can also collapse if a keystone species is lost, or if it is sufficiently disrupted.

A large fraction of the species on Earth is either extinct or rapidly disappearing. It is impossible to offer a more quantitative estimate because most of the macroscopic species have not yet even been cataloged, and of the microscopic species, including bacteria and fungi, our understanding has barely scratched the surface.

At some point, ecosystems collapse and species disappear because other species on which they depend are disappearing. This is happening in large stretches of the world.

Ocean life is seeking a new equilibrium after the pollution, overfishing and the killing spree of the last 50 years in particular. Forests and wetlands the world over no longer support the diversity of life that they once harbored, and the collapse of biodiversity has a momentum that continues over decades.

Major reasons for this collapse include:

  • Habitat loss.
  • Deforestation.
  • Every war is an environmental disaster.
  • Widespread poisoning of insects, which are at the base of the animal food chain.
  • Insects are also pollinators, and plant life becomes fragile when insects disappear.
  • Draining of wetlands, mining of fossil water and damming of rivers.
  • Deliberate targeting of apex predators, including lions, wolves and whales.
  • Washing of topsoil into the rivers and oceans.
  • Wasteful practices in mining, agriculture and industry.
  • Global travel, bringing invasive species that tend to homogenize ecosystems worldwide.

Many people, consciously or otherwise, imagine a transhuman future in which the Earth is paved over and food is grown hydroponically. We’ll eat lab-grown meat and live in a virtual paradise, even after we kill the ecosphere. This is a dangerous delusion! All life is interdependent. No species can survive outside an ecosystem.

Bacteria manufacture chemicals crucial for life. Insects pollinate. Fungi recycle waste, make atmospheric nitrogen biologically useful and connect trees underground. No species can exist without a rich ecosystem, and we don’t begin to understand all the connections that create a functional ecosystem.

Mankind’s one attempt to create an artificial ecosystem, dubbed Biosphere 2, fell flat on its face within weeks.

In murdering nature, we are destroying the foundation of human life as well.

2. Carbon dioxide has little to do with this

Anthropogenic global warming is a tiny fraction of the natural variations in Earth’s temperature.

There are great natural cycles in the Earth’s temperature. One of the best-documented is a cycle of about 100,000 years. The reasons are not well understood, but the present warm period in which human civilization has developed is not typical.

Ice ages are typical. As recently as 12,000 years ago, the part of Pennsylvania where I live was under a glacier two miles thick. When these conditions inevitably return, it will create a far greater disruption to animal life and to human activity than anthropogenic warming. “We’re overdue for the next ice age,” and it may be that “global warming” is helping to stave off that destiny, at least temporarily.

So, it’s true that we are at the warmest point in the last 100,000 years, but that has little to do with human activity. The 100,000-year cycle has a range of about 10oC, and human activity in the last 200 years is responsible for only about one 1oC.

Compared to local effects in America and Europe during the Little Ice Age of the 18th century, the effect of all our burning of fossil fuels is lost in the noise.

Global warming is a worldwide average, while the Little Ice Age was regional; but the point is that even in the last few hundred years, ecosystems have had to adapt to much larger changes than those that human activity has imposed.

All the hype about a climate catastrophe based on carbon emissions is based on computer models that are woefully inadequate. These models have been wrong about the changes in the last 40 years since modeling began.

They are no reliable guide to future climate response, though they are continually being cited as authority. In the last 7 years in particular, CO2 emissions have continued and accelerated, atmospheric concentration has increased steadily, but temperatures have gone up and down.

Dyson makes the point that plants grow faster when there is more CO2 in the air, and when temperatures are warmer.

Plants are the productive basis for all ecosystems, so ecosystems are enriched by higher CO2 levels. Clauser makes the point that there is no evidence that a pattern of extreme weather events can be related to more CO2 in the air.

3. The environmental movement has been derailed by the carbon narrative

Many people of goodwill are passionate about reducing their CO2 footprint. Many companies and organizations are profiting from scaring the public about climate change and selling solutions to enrich themselves such as carbon credits, or pushing nuclear power as a friendlier form of energy than burning wood, coal or petroleum products. (It is not.)

Government policies regarding energy could certainly be improved. The most effective thing we can do is to adopt technologies that use energy much more efficiently than we now do.

Cars that get 200 miles per gallon of gasoline already exist, and public transit can be much more efficient. Buildings can be designed so that they remain comfortable with much less energy input. The Rocky Mountain Institute has been creatively documenting the necessary policy changes for decades.

There is an urgent need for all of us to get back to advocating the diverse policy changes that are required to preserve and restore ecosystems, to slow and mitigate the Sixth Extinction. Reducing carbon emissions is dauntingly difficult, both technically and politically.

Technically, because so much of what we do depends on fossil fuel energy, politically because the economic benefits of burning fossil fuels accrue locally, while the costs, if any, are spread across the globe.

Burning oil is associated with spills that devastate ocean life for decades; burning coal is associated with mountaintop removal; fracking causes earthquakes and pollutes groundwater. Cars cause smog and coal-burning power plants put mercury in the air.

I’m not saying that fossil fuels are environmentally benign or that our dependence on carbon-based fuels is sustainable; only that atmospheric carbon dioxide is not the locus of the principal harm.

Focus on carbon emissions is the least effective kind of environmental advocacy, and it is probably counter-productive.

4. Weather manipulation is everywhere, and it’s unacknowledged

Chemtrails are real, though the motivation for this vast, multi-billion dollar project is unclear.

My best guess is that the High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program or HAARP, and similar large antennas are being used to push air masses around the globe with electrostatics and stratospheric heating and that seeding the stratosphere with aluminum is part of a coordinated effort to send that radio energy to desired locations.

Dane Wigington has done more than anyone to document this. He has an encyclopedic knowledge of the phenomena, but I don’t believe he understands the motivation for weather manipulation. This is his introductory video.

Droughts and cold snaps are being weaponized to reduce agriculture output. Hurricanes are being steered toward inhabited areas. It may be that weather manipulation could be applied in a productive and broadly beneficial program, but the evidence is that the opposite is being pursued.

I believe that the long drought in California, floods in Texas, and the recent transport of smoke from Quebec to blanket the densely populated Eastern U.S. are all examples of weather manipulation.

I believe that these engineered weather anomalies are being put forward as evidence that CO2 is deranging the weather. I realize that it is difficult to prove that any particular weather anomaly is engineered, but Wigington’s evidence convinces me.

But there is no doubt that the technology of weather manipulation has been under development for many decades, and present capabilities are unacknowledged. Who is manipulating the weather and what is motivating them? I think these are important, open questions.

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/ecosystems-collapsing-not-co2-emissions/

Measles Eradication Via Vaccination: The Ultimate Nirvana Fallacy

Measles cases are spreading, despite high vaccination rates. What’s ...

JAMES LYONS-WEILER

It seems every few years when the peak of the normal cycling of measles cases comes in, those who profit from vaccination and ad revenue from Pharma freak out and go on a rampage against people who decline the MMR vaccine for their children.

The Nirvana Fallacy of a world without measles due to 100% vaccination coverage has been disproven over and over with real-world data on outbreaks in highly vaccinated populations – and breakthrough infections in the vaccinated.

That’s vaccine failure, plain and simple. Let’s not forget about two former Merck employees, both virologists named Stephen A. Krahling and Joan A. Wlochowski.

[…]

In 2010, the whistleblowers filed a suit against Merck. The suit drags on in court (“UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al. v. MERCK & CO.,” Case No. 2:10-cv-04374-CDJ).

The Huffington Post reports on the charges in the suit (See: Merck Has Some Explaining To Do Over Its MMR Vaccine Claims, 9/24/2014, updated: 11/27/2014):

“…former Merck scientists [claim] that Merck ‘fraudulently misled the government and omitted, concealed, and adulterated material information regarding the efficacy of its mumps vaccine in violation of the FCA [False Claims Act].’”

“According to the whistleblowers’ court documents, Merck’s misconduct was far-ranging: It ‘failed to disclose that its mumps vaccine was not as effective as Merck represented, (ii) used improper testing techniques, (iii) manipulated testing methodology, (iv) abandoned undesirable test results, (v) falsified test data, (vi) failed to adequately investigate and report the diminished efficacy of its mumps vaccine, (vii) falsely verified that each manufacturing lot of mumps vaccine would be as effective as identified in the labeling, (viii) falsely certified the accuracy of applications filed with the FDA, (ix) falsely certified compliance with the terms of the CDC purchase [of the MMR vaccine] contract, (x) engaged in the fraud and concealment described herein for the purpose of illegally monopolizing the U.S. market for mumps vaccine, (xi) mislabeled, misbranded, and falsely certified its mumps vaccine, and (xii) engaged in the other acts described herein to conceal the diminished efficacy of the vaccine the government was purchasing.’”

“These fraudulent activities, say the whistleblowers, were designed to produce test results that would meet the FDA’s requirement that the mumps vaccine was 95 percent effective. To the whistleblowers’ delight, the judge dismissed Merck’s objections to the case proceeding, finding the whistleblowers had plausible grounds on all of the claims lodged against Merck.” The whistleblowers’ charges include detailed specifics on how Merck cheated, in order to produce the false conclusion that the mumps component of the MMR vaccine was 95% effective. For example, Merck placed rabbit antibodies into blood samples—pretending these were human antibodies signaling a high level of immune response to the vaccine.”

[From Two More MMR Vaccine Whistleblowers: They’re Suing]

Below is a letter sent by Cindy Bevington Olmstead (LinkedIn) to Margaret Wente at the Globe and Mail, Canada in July of 2013. Wente had published an article attempting to lay the blame for a local measles outbreak on people who choose to not have their children vaccinated with the measles, mumps & rubella (MMR) vaccine.

The problem with blaming so-called “Anti-vaxxers” is that as far as assessing causality goes, Science says it’s not AVers who are responsible. They just help provide evidence that the vaccine efficacy is waning. More on that in a moment. Here’s Cindy’s letter:

“Dear Ms. Wente,

As a journalist, you should do your homework Ms. Wente.

If you had done so, you would know that measles often occurs in fully vaccinated populations (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3821823), that the vaccine often does not work if the vaccinee has exposure to the sun or UVR rays around the time of vaccination (http://www.springerlink.com/content/v545057823230786/)*, that the active form of vitamin D (1,25(OH)2D3), derived from UVR-supported biosynthesis has well-documented immunomodulatory effects, and that there has been concern that increased exposure to UVR due to stratospheric ozone depletion could hamper the effectiveness of vaccines, particularly BCG, measles, and hepatitis (http://www.who.int/globalchange/publications/climatechangechap8.pdf).

You would also know that Harvard University researchers have found that because measles occur in highly vaccinated populations, VACCINATED PERSONS ARE A GREATER RISK TO THE UNVACCINATED than vice versa (See “AN EXPLOSIVE POINT-SOURCE MEASLES OUTBREAK IN A HIGHLY VACCINATED POPULATION: MODES OF TRANSMISSION AND RISK FACTORS FOR DISEASE https://academic.oup.com/aje/article-abstract/129/1/173/58793”) and that based on measles dynamics for industrialized countries, high birth rate regions should experience regular annual epidemics (See http://www.cidd.psu.edu/research/synopses/measles-outbreaks-niger/?searchterm=measles) because measles outbreaks come in waves just like pertussis.

If you bothered to go even a little further in your research, you would know that vaccine researchers have also found that EXPOSURE TO NATURAL MEASLES IS IMPORTANT in maintaining protective antibody levels among vaccinated children (http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/content/149/4/304.long) and that several studies have shown that measles or rubella-like illnesses in MMR vaccinated children are caused by other viruses.

Then again, most journalists these days don’t bother to do their homework so I can understand why you continue to perpetuate the vaccine sales propaganda, blaming non-vaccinated children on the measles outbreaks, along with the rest of the media, which has grown so lazy they don’t question anything that’s fed to them anymore. So sad that as intelligent as you are you haven’t bothered to look up the data for yourself.

[Globe & Mail article: Measles is back. It had help – The Globe and Mail (archive.org)]

Here are some additional fun facts about measles vaccine failure:

“Of the 194 measles virus sequences obtained in the United States in 2015, 73 were identified as vaccine sequences (R. J. McNall, unpublished data) – 37.6%”

[…]

In measles-endemic areas, breakthrough cases represent less than 10% of total infections, while in areas with high vaccination coverage, these are over 10% of the total. Two different vaccination failures have been described: primary vaccination failure, which consists in the complete absence of humoral response and occurs in around 5% of vaccinated individuals; and secondary vaccination failure is due to waning immunity or incomplete immunity and occurs in 2–10% of vaccinees.

Fappani C, Gori M, Canuti M, Terraneo M, Colzani D, Tanzi E, Amendola A, Bianchi S. Breakthrough Infections: A Challenge towards Measles Elimination? Microorganisms. 2022 Aug 4;10(8):1567. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10081567. PMID: 36013985; PMCID: PMC9413104.

“Two Vitamin A megadoses (200,000 international units (IUs) on each day for two days) lowered the number of deaths from measles in hospitalized children under the age of two years. Two doses of vitamin A are not considered to be too expensive and are not likely to produce adverse effects.”

Huiming Y, Chaomin W, Meng M. Vitamin A for treating measles in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;2005(4):CD001479. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001479.pub3. PMID: 16235283; PMCID: PMC7076287.

We’re going to see measles cases in increasing numbers as vaccine efficacy continues to wane. There’s nothing anyone can do about it. The community of individuals who bother to understand the dynamics involved will not tolerate the restriction of personal and civil liberties over the Nirvana Fallacy of measles eradication.

Twenty-five mainstream studies that demonstrate these products fail, have limited duration, prevent mothers from delivering antibodies to infants, and will in the long-term cause as many problems as they solve – compromising human resistance to measles without remotely eliminating it:

[…]

Via https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2023/08/07/measles-eradication-via-vaccination-the-ultimate-nirvana-fallacy/

Why does Russia now believe that Covid-19 was a US-created bioweapon?

Abandoned papers found at US biolabs in Ukraine have led the Russian ministry of defence to declare its belief that Covid-19 is a bioweapon. Whether purposefully or accidentally leaked is not clear. What is becoming clear is that the holy grail of the imperialist bioweapons programme is producing diseases that will affect certain genotypes (Russian or Chinese in particular) more than others.

The Communists

Reporting of chemical, biological and genetic experimentation, ‘biosecurity’ and bioweapons has become so integral to the information war that it has become hard to disentangle fact from fiction, and truth from psychological operation, even for those with sound political instincts and a healthy scepticism.

Yet the war in Ukraine is shedding some remarkable light on the global network of dual-use biological laboratories that the US state, and its military-medical research-pharmaceutical axis, has been building and operating.

When the many sources of evidence are collated – ranging from data found on Hunter Biden’s laptop to attacks on Latin-American crops, livestock, economies and national leaders, to the US-Ukrainian labs that have fallen into Russian hands during its special military operation – the systematic nature and remarkably sinister aims of the US biological programme are strikingly revealed.

Weaponising the Covid-19 pandemic – information and experimentation

As the Covid pandemic unfolded, there were multiple accusations and counteraccusations regarding the origins of the virus: Covid was a bioweapon released deliberately by China, we were told. Or it was a consequence of natural transfection due to the unnatural proclivity of the Chinese to visit farmers’ markets.

Or, there had been a lab leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where experimentation into coronaviruses, including ‘gain-of-function’ research, is carried out – interestingly part-funded by the US company ‘EcoHealth Alliance’, which pursues such research, together with the US military and pharmaceutical companies, at multiple sites around the world, as we shall see later.

Weaponising the Covid pandemic as part of a broader anti-China propaganda war; this trope was carried worldwide by the western media and intelligence agencies.

The Chinese quite diplomatically but firmly pushed back against this propaganda, with US president Donald Trump in turn threatening to cancel Chinese treasury bonds – that is the $1.1tn of the USA’s $28tn national debt then held by China. (Was the Covid theory about a Wuhan lab leak right all along? by Jonathan Calvert, The Times, 4 March 2023)

The World Health Organisation (WHO) did not support this narrative and was promptly defunded by the USA.

In the context of escalating trade and military conflict with Russia and China, the narrative of the Wuhan lab leak is receiving another big push – although evidence of Chinese culpability is conspicuously absent from the web of assertions.

But gain-of-function research (enhancing transmissibility, virus replication, virulence, host range, immune evasion or drug and vaccine resistance) is quite clearly going on, and the prime movers behind this research are the Nato countries, and particularly the USA.

Weaponising pathogens, to be released in strategic locations as part of a multidimensional or ‘hybrid’ war on any nation that steps out of line with the hegemonic aims of Anglo-American imperialism and its allied and servant network of states, underscores this strategy.

Biological warfare and imperialism

Biological agents have been used in warfare for centuries. During the 14th century, Mongol armies catapulted the infected corpses of plague victims over the walls of the besieged city of Caffa, in what is now Fedosia, in the Crimea, to try to force the surrender of the city’s inhabitants.

But with the advent of modern capitalist imperialism, the wider extension and more intense nature of systems of exploitation extending over continents, combined with advancing scientific knowledge have increased the frequency and potency of their use.

What’s more, there are numerous post-WW2 examples of US and British state experimentation on the prison population, the military, and even on their own civilian populations to study the spread of pathogens.

If British and US workers were considered fit subjects for death-by-biological-weapons testing, one need only call to mind the colonial racism and arrogance of the British Raj and of the US elite to realise the contempt in which the imperialists hold the lives of their colonial subjects. It is thus quite easy to appreciate the penchant of these supremacist sociopaths for experimentation upon the subject peoples, with the aim of maintaining their rule and the source of their vast superprofits.

‘Biosecurity’, research and biological warfare

In February 2022, during the first weeks of the Russian intervention against the US-installed fascist junta in Ukraine, the Russian government and military highlighted their findings that the USA had been operating some 26 biolabs in Ukraine. The information they supplied was initially dismissed by Nato politicians and the western mainstream press as “Russian subterfuge”. (Russia plans ‘very graphic’ fake video as pretext for Ukraine invasion, US claims by Julian Borger, The Guardian, 3 February 2023)

“The Russian army has obtained documentary evidence confirming the Pentagon was involved in financing military-biological projects in Ukraine, the chief of Russia’s radiation, chemical and biological protection force, Igor Kirillov, has said.

“‘We believe that components of biological weapons were being created in Ukraine,’ Kirillov said. He demonstrated a document dated 6 March 2015 confirming ‘the Pentagon’s direct involvement in financing military biological experiments in Ukraine’.

“He stressed that it was standard practice to fund US sanitary and epidemiological wellbeing projects in third countries, including those in Africa and Asia, through national health service agencies.” (Russian military has documentary evidence US funded bioexperiments in Ukraine , 17 March 2022)

Hunter Biden’s role shows direct links to the US president

Moreover, these claims were substantiated by leaked emails from the laptop of Hunter Biden (US president Joe Biden’s son), and even admitted to by some mainstream papers.

The Daily Mail, for example, noted that “the commander of the Russian nuclear, biological and chemical protection forces claimed there was a ‘scheme of interaction between US government agencies and Ukrainian biological objects’ and pointed to the ‘financing of such activities by structures close to the current US leadership, in particular the investment fund Rosemont Seneca, which is headed by Hunter Biden’ …

[…]

Igor Kirillov also drew attention to the Bidens’ connection to the bioweapons programme:

“‘Incoming material allowed us to trace the interaction scheme between US government agencies and the Ukrainian biolab,’ Kirillov said, adding that the involvement in financing these activities by structures close to current US leadership, in particular Hunter Biden’s Rosemont Seneca investment fund, draws attention to itself …

“‘At the same time, a close relationship has been established between the fund and key contractors of the US military, including Metabiota, which alongside Black & Veatch, is one of the main suppliers of equipment for Pentagon biolaboratories around the world,’ Kirillov added.” (Hunter Biden’s investment fund linked to Ukrainian biolabs engaged in pathogen research: Russian defence ministry, Global Times, 25 March 2022)

[…]

China’s view

Zhao Lijian, spokesman for the foreign ministry of the People’s Republic of China, was asked during a press conference – also on 8 March 2022 – to comment on the Ukrainian biolabs. His statement was far more balanced than anything to be found in scores of articles on the subject in the British press:

“Lately, US biological labs in Ukraine have indeed attracted much attention. According to reports, a large quantity of dangerous viruses are stored in these facilities. Russia has found during its military operations that the USA uses these facilities to conduct bio-military plans …

[…]

Lawless protectorates the ideal venue for unethical research

The extensive network of US biolabs points to the larger goal: the control and domination of the biological environment as a means of war.

Many analysts rank cultured and genetically-engineered biological organisms as the most dangerous of all existing weapons technologies, with the potential for producing far more extensive and devastating effects on human populations than even fusion nuclear weapons.

[…]

The special military operation in Ukraine

Russia’s SMO has unearthed – literally – evidence that “the regime in Kiev had urgently eliminated traces of a US Department of Defence-funded military biological programme in Ukraine. Ukrainian laboratories’ staffers testified that on 24 February 2022 pathogens of plague, anthrax, tularemia, cholera and other deadly diseases were urgently eliminated.” (Biden must explain his son’s involvement in biolabs operation in Ukraine – Duma speaker, Tass, 24 March 2022)

[…]

Genotyping to ‘racially’ target bioweapons

“We have already informed you that more than 16,000 biological samples, including blood and serum samples, were taken from Ukraine to the USA, Georgia and European countries.

“Against the background of the US administration’s assurances that the genetic information obtained from Ukrainian citizens will be used ‘exclusively for peaceful purposes’, I would like to quote a statement by Jason Crow of the US House Intelligence Committee at the North American security conference in July.

[…]

Increasing evidence that USA caused the Covid-19 pandemic

“In May 2022, Jeffrey Sachs – a leading expert in the respected medical journal The Lancet and professor at Columbia University, which is the leading academic institution for global biosecurity – told a conference in Spain that ‘the coronavirus was artificially created and is very likely to have been created using American advances in biotechnology’.

“‘According to our experts, this is evidenced by the uncharacteristic variability of the genovariants that cause different peaks in the incidence of coronaviruses, significant differences in lethality and contagiousness, uneven geographical distribution, and the unpredictable nature of the epidemic process as a whole. It appears that despite efforts to contain and isolate the disease, the pandemic is being artificially fuelled by the introduction of new variants of the virus in a particular region.

“‘We are considering the possibility that the US Agency for International Development (USAid) was involved in the emergence of the new coronavirus. Since 2009, the agency has funded the Predict programme, which has investigated new species of coronaviruses by capturing bats that carry the viruses. One of the contractors for the project was Metabiota, a company known for its military-biological activities in Ukraine.’

[…]

Via https://thecommunists.org/2023/07/03/news/russia-believes-covid-19-usa-bioweapon/

U.S. manufacturing jobs and trade: A tale of two graphs

Dean Baker

Real-World Economics Review Blog

The first decade of this century was pretty awful for U.S. manufacturing workers. In December of 1999 we had 17.3 million manufacturing jobs. This number had fallen to 11.5 million by December of 2009. This amounted to a loss of 5.8 million jobs, or one-third of all the manufacturing jobs that had existed at the start of the decade. That looks like a pretty big deal.

It’s also worth pointing out that most of these jobs were lost before the onset of the Great Recession. We had lost almost 4 million jobs by December of 2007, the official start date of the Great Recession. The obvious culprit here is the explosion in U.S. trade deficit that we saw in this decade. If we’re buying more goods from other countries, in general, that means we are producing fewer goods here.

It’s also worth noting that even the manufacturing job loss that resulted from Great Recession may have a substantial trade component. Manufacturing is always highly cyclical. We lose manufacturing jobs in a downturn, but get them back when the economy recovers. That didn’t happen with the recovery from the Great Recession.

This matters because manufacturing was traditionally a heavily unionized sector. Due to its high unionization rate, manufacturing jobs paid a wage premium over jobs in other sectors. This was especially important for workers (primarily male workers) without college degrees. Manufacturing was an important source of high-wage jobs for workers with less education.

The lost jobs in this period were disproportionately unionized jobs. In 2022, the unionization rate in manufacturing was just 7.8 percent, only slightly higher than the 6.0 percent rate for the private sector as a whole.

Anyhow, that’s the story from the standpoint of someone who thinks our trade policies have done real harm to a large group of workers. It is possible to paint a different picture.

Suppose we look at manufacturing employment as a share of total employment. Here’s that picture.

It doesn’t look like anything special is going on in the first decade of this century. The manufacturing share of employment had been dropping for decades. The 00s don’t look very different from 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. What is there to complain about?

This is the graph that proponents of U.S. trade policy like to tout. But there is another graph. This one just shows manufacturing employment since 1970.

While there are cyclical ups and downs in the prior three decades, there is only a modest downward trend over this period. That changes in a big way when we get to the 2000s. You can’t look at this graph (or at least I can’t) and say that the 00s were just more of the same.

This was the period where we saw a massive loss of manufacturing jobs in places like Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. The economy looked very different in these states at the end of the decade than it did at the start of the decade.

I will make one other point here. No one should say that the issue here was “globalization.” There are an infinite number of ways that we can increase the integration of the U.S. economy with the rest of the world. For example, we could reduce our patent and copyright protections so that U.S. technology, especially in areas like health care and climate, can be more easily shared with the rest of the world.

We can also focus our trade deals on standardizing licensing requirements for professional services, so that foreign doctors, dentists, and other professionals from the rest of the world can more easily practice in the United States. This would offer the textbook “gains from trade,” but the losers would be workers in highly paid professions and the rest of us would be gainers.

But we chose not to go this route with our trade deals. Trade deals were focused on making it as easy as possible to import manufactured goods, putting our manufacturing workers in direct competition with low paid workers in China, Mexico, and elsewhere.

This had the predicted and actual effect of costing millions of manufacturing jobs and sharply reducing the pay in the ones that remain. But this was not a story of “globalization.” It was a story of crafting trade deals in a world where doctors and other professionals have much more political power than manufacturing workers.

[…]

Via https://rwer.wordpress.com/2023/08/07/u-s-manufacturing-jobs-and-trade-a-tale-of-two-graphs/

Is this First Lady Also the First Female Presidential Assassin?

A person sitting in a chair Description automatically generated with medium confidence

[Source: historycentral.com]

Jeremy Kuzmarov

Covert Action Magazine

Evidence Suggests that First Lady Florence Harding Killed Her Husband, the 29th President Warren G. Harding, A Century Ago Today to Protect His Reputation and Legacy.

On the night of August 2, 1923, exactly one hundred years ago, President Warren G. Harding, 57, suddenly fell ill and died at the opulent Palace hotel in San Francisco.

In most history books, the cause of Harding’s death is listed as a heart attack. But significant contemporary testimony—including that of the heir of the man who owned the San Francisco hotel where Harding died, says Harding should be added to the list of presidents who have been assassinated while in office, and that he was actually murdered—with the primary suspect being his wife Florence.[1]

On the night Harding died, Florence was reading to her husband, who had been traveling on the West Coast after visiting Alaska.

When Warren suddenly stopped breathing, Florence screamed for doctors. After he was declared dead, the doctors kept switching the cause of death, first claiming that a blood vessel in Harding’s brain had burst, then saying he had died of a stroke, and then of a heart attack and gall bladder condition.

Florence ordered that no autopsy be performed and that Warren’s body be embalmed immediately.[2]

Shortly before he died, Harding had been asking Commerce Secretary Herbert Hoover’s advice on publicly exposing “a great scandal in our administration.”[3] Hoover said that when he walked into Harding’s room, his doctor, Charles Sawyer was oddly lying on the bed next to his dead body.[4]

When Janet Johnston, the granddaughter of the Palace Hotel’s founder, U.S. Senator William Sharon (R-NV) entered the Hardings’ room and saw that Warren was dead, Florence flew into a rage, claiming that the hotel’s food had killed her husband and that she was going to sue.

Janet, however, told Florence that the claim was ludicrous as no one else staying at the hotel suffered from any food-borne illnesses.

When Janet picked up a half-filled glass near President Harding’s bed, she found that it had a noxious odor and suspected that whatever was in the glass had something to do with his death.

Janet told Florence that she intended to have the contents of the glass analyzed, at which point Florence snatched the glass away and managed to pour whatever was in it down the drain. She then turned to Janet and said “there will be no lawsuit.””[5]

[…]

The Duchess and “her Warren”

Florence was among the more popular First Ladies whose words were quoted in newspapers and magazines and whose image was displayed in newsreels.

A feminist who supported suffrage and championed the interests of the nation’s World War I veterans, Florence had opened the White House to visitors and encouraged women to exercise, play sports and be as physically fit as men.[6] At the same time, she wrote and corrected her husband’s speeches and weighed in on his choices for important Cabinet posts.[7]

Florence’s behavior on the night of her husband’s death was not out of character as she had a domineering nature and was fiercely loyal to “her Warren,” who called her “the Duchess.”

Gaston Means, a private investigator hired by Florence to look into her husband’s extramarital trysts, described Florience as a “woman of brains: cold, logical [and calculating]” with a “consuming thirst for power.” For years she was the financial head of the Harding household since Warren was a “child in business matters.”Possessing beautiful blue eyes and a delicate body with unusually large hands, Florence had worked tirelessly behind the scenes to place her husband “in the highest position in…the greatest nation of the world.”

She was “familiar with everything pertaining to governmental affairs to the last detail,” Means wrote. This included “every phase of state and diplomatic strategy.” As First Lady, Florence “continue[d] to be the central moving factor [in her husband’s political career]: the determining factor.”[9]

What Kind of President Was Warren G. Harding?

A newspaper publisher from Marion, Ohio, Harding defeated his Democratic Party challenger, James Cox, in the 1920 presidential election, campaigning on a slogan of a “return to normalcy” after the tumult of World War I and the first Red Scare.

During a five year career in the U.S. Senate Harding introduced 134 bills of which 122 were local Ohio affairs, with the other 12 focusing on mundane matters like promoting celebration of the landing of the Pilgrims. The New York Times considered Harding to be the “firm and perfect flower of the cowardice and imbecility of the Senatorial cabal.”[10]

As President, Harding reduced the federal debt and released political prisoners like Socialist Party leader Eugene V. Debs, who had been jailed for opposing U.S. entry into the Great War.

He also proposed a reduction in military spending, withdrew U.S. troops from Cuba and the Dominican Republic, and oversaw the Washington Naval Conference of 1921-1922 in which the world’s major powers agreed on a naval limitation program—albeit one that maintained strategic advantage for the U.S. and England vis-à-vis Japan, which expanded its program of militarization and regional colonization in response.[11]

In 1923, Massachusetts Senator Henry Cabot Lodge confided to a friend that “Harding is very satisfactory to the financial interests.”[12] His Attorney General, Harry Daugherty, “quashed prosecution of war profiteers and other spoilsmen of Wall Street and waged vigorous warfare against labor organizations” while the Commerce Department, under the direction of Herbert Hoover, was transformed into a “marketing agency for the big industries.”[13]

Harding’s white supremacist outlook was apparent in his praise for Lothrop Stoddard, whose book The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy (1920) warned about the destruction of white society by invading non-white hordes.

As a precursor to modern day conservatives, Harding supported a harsh anti-immigrant bill mandating deportations and drastic income tax cuts (the top marginal rate was reduced from 75% in 1921 to 25% in 1925) based on the argument of Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon[14] that lower rates would increase tax revenues because, when income taxes were high, money was driven underground or abroad.

Libertarian historians credit these cuts with ushering in a dramatic period of economic growth, though many other historians blame Mellon’s economic approach for the sweeping inequality and economic volatility that produced the Great Crash of 1929 and the Depression.[15]

An Administration Scarred with Shame and Corruption

When Arthur M. Schlesinger, Sr. polled historians to measure presidents’ standing in 1948 and 1962, Harding ranked dead last. Schlesinger concluded that Harding and Ulysses S. Grant were “morally obtuse” and conducted administrations “scarred with shame and corruption.”[16]

According to historian Ferdinand Lundberg, Harding was a product of Mark Hanna’s Standard Oil machine in Ohio and his administration was “soaked in petroleum.”[17]

The Ohio gang was a collection of powerful political figures and industrialists mainly from Ohio who held sway over Harding and pushed him to sign legislation that benefited the petroleum industry and made them rich.[18] They were involved in an array of criminal schemes, including arranging for the sale of permits to people who wanted to withdraw liquor from bonded government warehouses and worked out illegal sales of government property.[19]

A popular saying held that “everything was for sale in Washington during the Harding administration—except the dome of the Capitol.”[20]

Just three months after his inauguration, Harding issued an executive order transferring the Navy’s oil reserves from the Navy to the Department of the Interior so they could be acquired by private companies.

The Ohio gang derived enormous profits from buying up oil company stocks. Hundreds of thousands of dollars derived from illicit financial dealings and graft were stored in secret vaults, as members of the gang “had daily banquets of the finest food and finest wines.”[21]

The corruption in Harding’s administration was exemplified by the Teapot Dome scandal in which a Senate investigation led by Senators Thomas J. Walsh (D-MT) and Burton K. Wheeler (D-MT) uncovered that Secretary of the Interior Albert B. Fall had leased Navy petroleum reserves at Teapot Dome in Wyoming, as well as two locations in California, to private oil companies—Sinclair and Pan American Petroleum and Transport—at low rates without competitive bidding after taking $404,000 in bribes.[22]

Government investigators and people linked to the scandal died suddenly before they were slated to testify. Harry Daugherty’s gopher, Jess Smith, was said to have shot himself with a pistol in Washington’s Wardman Hotel; however, nobody heard the shot, and Smith never fired a pistol in his life—he was mortally afraid to ever hold one.[23]

Senator James Thomas Heflin said: “nobody knew what he [Smith] knew, and with him dead there was nobody to tell the story—so Jess Smith was murdered.”[24]

Who Tipped Off The Wall Street Journal Publisher?

Clarence Walker Barron, publisher of the Wall Street Journal, seems to have had foreknowledge of Harding’s death–which would seem to corroborate that he had been poisoned.

During a bridge game at his home the night Harding died, Barron had his secretary phone his office until news came across the wire that Harding had a stomach ache from eating crab.

Barron then exclaimed: “That’s it! get me the vice-president [Calvin Coolidge]”–who was spending the evening with his father and one of Barron’s good friends.[25]

Revelations of Gaston Means

Gaston Means was hired by Mrs. Harding to investigate Warren’s affair with a young woman named Nan Britton who alleged that Harding fathered her child—a claim that was validated by correspondence found 40 years after Harding’s death and recent DNA testing.[26]

In 1930, with the assistance of a ghostwriter, May Dixon Thacker, Means published a book, The Strange Death of President Harding (New York: Guild Publishing Corporation, 1930), which suggested that Mrs. Harding had killed her husband to prevent his impeachment and protect his legacy, which would have been tarnished by revelations about his philandering and the deep corruption in his administration which was in the process of being exposed.[27]


Postscript: For weeks after Warren’s death, smoke could be seen rising from the White House chimney as Florence burned her now deceased president’s papers in order to protect him—a task that she continued after she returned to live on a farm in Marion, Ohio.[37]

A year later, Florence died—like her husband under suspicious circumstances. Perhaps she too was a victim of the machinations of the Ohio gang, which either sought revenge on her or wanted to ensure that the truth of her husband’s death never got out.

Vaccines and SIDS (Crib Death)

SIDS - Wikipedia

Executive summary

They are lying to you.

Most of the SIDS cases (likely 75% or more) are due to the childhood vaccines. Vaccines are the main cause of autism as well, likely 75% or more.

In fact, pediatric clinics that avoid vaccines have zero, or near-zero, rates of SIDS and autism.

In this article, I’m going to discuss how just two black swans can destroy the medical consensus by proving that the medical community couldn’t have gotten it right on their claims that vaccines don’t cause autism or SIDS:

  • A police officer who investigated 300 SIDS cases over a 7 year period (about 3 to 4 cases per month), observed that 75% of the cases happened within 48 hours after a vaccine.
  • A couple who got their triplets (not identical) vaccinated all developed autism within hours after the shot (and each other).

These anecdotes happened, and they are “statistically impossible” to have happened by chance (at least not in our lifetime).

I don’t believe it is possible to attack this data or explain it away.

Too many SIDS cases happened within 48 hours of the vaccine for the vaccine not to have caused the deaths

In an earlier Substack, I reported the case of a police officer assigned to investigate SIDS cases over a 7 year period who observed that 75% of the 300 cases happened within 48 hours of a vaccine.

At the time, I wasn’t sure how to calculate the probability of that happening.

But now, thanks to Professor Norman Fenton, I do.

If SIDS is just randomly happening to babies, and babies are vaccinated every 60 days like clockwork, the chance of a SIDS death happening within any 48 hour window post-vaccine is 1/30.

So if there are 300 babies who died of SIDS, we’d expect that 10 of them, on average, would happen within every 48 hour window post vaccine.

So what are the chances of 75% of these deaths (or more) happening within 48 hours after the shot?

The calculation is trivial to get the chance of seeing 225 deaths or more:

>>> poisson.sf(225-1,10)
3.7718601504237225e-213

That’s not a typo. 10 to the -213. That’s as close to impossible as it gets.

In other words, if SIDS is randomly happening with respect to the time of vaccination, it is impossible to have made this observation. We can cherry pick all we want, we’ll never find a cherry like this to pick. Ever.

This leads to the inevitable conclusion that the vaccines are the primary cause of SIDS, and that they are, at a minimum, causing 75% or more of all SIDS cases.

What’s so special about this police officer

She asked the parents of the deceased when the child was last vaccinated!!

Few other police officers in the world would ever ask such a question because they all know that “it couldn’t be the vaccine.”

So we were lucky enough to find a police officer that asked the question for each of her cases.

And by the way, even if she got it wrong and only 10% of the cases were within 48 hours of the vaccine, there is, by random chance, less than 1 chance in a million of observing that.

Our autism anecdote is also impossible if vaccines aren’t causing autism

The McDowell triplets (featured in the movie Vaxxed II) all got autism on the same day, within hours of each other.

Did that happen by chance? It happened within hours of their vaccine injection.

Check this out. Nearly 1M views in less than 24 hours after posting.

Again, the calculation is trivial.

Say kids only get autism between ages 1 and 4 to be conservative, so an exposure window of 3 years = 1095 days. The current rate of autism is 1 in every 35 kids per the CDC, but the McDowell triplets were vaccinated on June 25, 2007.

U.S. Autism Prevalence Rate Soars to 1 in 59 Children - SafeMinds

So around 1 in 100 kids would get autism in the 1095 day exposure period back in 2007.

So what’s the expected number of cases of autism in a single day per child? Pretty darn low: 1e-5. So if you have 3 kids, you’d expect to get 3e-5 autism cases in any 24 hour period, on average in 2007.

To see 3 (or more) events in a 24 hour window when you expected to see 3e-5 events is:

>>> poisson.sf(2,3e-5)
4.499898751214992e-15

This means that the McDowell triplets couldn’t have possibly happened by “bad luck.”

The vaccine they were given just hours earlier is the only possible way this event could have happened.

This means vaccines can cause autism.

We didn’t need more than one anecdote to prove that conclusively.

Speculation re: genes cause autism to happen at the same time

I just provided an anecdote where all three kids got autism within hours after a shot.

If you want to make the hand-waving argument that it is just a coincidence because triplets all get autism at the same time, simply show me a case where the autism happened in triplets all on the same day where a vaccine was not involved.

Also, explain this anecdote where one twin was given the vaccine and developed autism, and the twin not given the vaccine didn’t. You can simply show us the opposite anecdote where after the vaccine shot, the twin who did not get the vaccine got autism and the twin who got the vaccine did not get autism.

If you cannot provide evidence for either, your argument lacks evidentiary support and is simply not credible.

These two verifiable “black swan” anecdotes should be all that is needed to disprove the null hypothesis and totally discredit the medical community on these important issues

The medical consensus was that “black swans” don’t exist, i.e., vaccines don’t cause SIDS or autism.

It takes only a single verifiable sighting of a “black swan” to prove that the consensus was wrong.

[…]

Via https://kirschsubstack.com/p/two-verifiable-anecdotes-are-the