The Most Revolutionary Act

Uncensored updates on world events, economics, the environment and medicine

The Most Revolutionary Act
Unknown's avatar

About stuartbramhall

Retired child and adolescent psychiatrist and American expatriate in New Zealand. In 2002, I made the difficult decision to close my 25-year Seattle practice after 15 years of covert FBI harassment. I describe the unrelenting phone harassment, illegal break-ins and six attempts on my life in my 2010 book The Most Revolutionary Act: Memoir of an American Refugee.

Disabled Vet Combed Obituaries for the Words ‘Suddenly’ and ‘Unexpectedly’ — Here’s What He Found

Steve Connolly, a disabled Iraq War combat veteran and recovering alcoholic in Massachusetts, was horrified by the number of deaths among his friends at Alcoholics Anonymous meetings starting in 2021 after the COVID-19 vaccine rollouts. Experts said he made an astonishing data discovery that corroborates Ed Dowd and Pierre Kory’s work on vaccine-induced excess deaths in all 50 states.

Steve Connolly, an Iraq War combat veteran, was horrified by all the death and dying around him — not in the Iraq killing fields, but in Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) meetings starting in 2021, after the COVID-19 vaccines rolled out.

Connolly, a 61-year-old disabled vet and retired social worker who cared for the most severe and violent mentally ill patients in Massachusetts, said the formerly routine AA meetings became scenes of more suffering and carnage than he’d ever witnessed in war or among “the worst of the worst” in mental hospitals.

“In all of my time, I’ve never seen this many people that I know dropping dead in this span of time,” Connolly said.

Verne was in his 70s, relatively healthy and stable, Connolly said, “coughing on a Sunday, dead on Monday.” Big Rob was in his 30s, a little obese, and “died from myocarditis.”

Allie was in her 30s, a heavy girl, but healthy. “She got the jab, then had serious gallbladder issues and had it removed. She was found dead when she didn’t show up for work.”

A physician in AA, known as Dr. Michael, debated Connolly about the jab. “I tried to explain it to him. He didn’t believe me. Two weeks later, he got the booster. He died from a heart attack a few days later. Then they killed my friend, and I started to investigate.”

In an exclusive interview with The Defender, Connolly relayed how, driven by anger and pain over the unexplained scourge of deaths, he pored over “thousands and thousands and thousands” of obituaries and discovered that deaths reported as “suddenly” or “unexpectedly” on legacy.com obits soared more than 62% across the U.S. after the rollout of the mRNA vaccines.

Connolly’s data trove, assembled with the help of Massachusetts systems engineer and vaccine-death investigator John Beaudoin Sr., matches to a remarkable degree the unprecedented rise in U.S. excess deaths and disabilities in government data reported by former BlackRock hedge-fund manager Edward Dowd, Dr. Pierre Kory and others, Kory said.

Kory, president of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance who treats COVID-19-vaccine-injured patients in his practice, has written extensively calling for the government, insurance companies, public health officials and major media to acknowledge and investigate the catastrophic health crisis of excess deaths and disabilities striking not just the U.S. but all countries where the vaccines were rolled out on a massive scale.

Kory last week discovered Connolly’s data, published in August 2023 on Beaudoin’s Substack, Coquin de Chien’s Newsletter (French for “Naughty Dog”), and wrote about it on his Substack.

“For those of us already fully aware of the massive excess deaths caused by the mRNA vaccines, it is difficult to be impressed with new data sources proving same,” Kory wrote.

“I thought the EMS data I posted yesterday was shocking,” Kory wrote. But Connolly’s “charts of his findings are beyond compelling and deserve wider sharing.”

Asked by The Defender to quantify the significance of Connolly’s data, Kory — who was a highly published University of Wisconsin-Madison professor of pulmonary critical care medicine and ran the intensive care units at two of the world’s top academic medical centers — said, “I would just say that, like all the other sources revealing such a tight temporal association, this also leads to no other explanation but the vaccines as the principal driver of the excess mortality.”

“It’s uncanny,” Connolly said. “I go to an AA meeting every day and people are dying around me, people I know and don’t know. Almost every meeting has new people talking about their relatives dying or having a stroke or another ailment like Guillain-Barré [syndrome] or heart attack. It’s unusual now that a medical event hasn’t befallen someone.”

When he hears the tragic stories, Connolly said, “I just point to my arm with my finger.”

Connolly, who lives in Hubbardston (pop. 4,300) in central Massachusetts, served two tours with the U.S. Army in Iraq and 13 years with the National Guard. Sober for 26 years, he relapsed after his second tour in Iraq and battled alcoholism for eight years but has been sober since Aug. 21, 2020.

During the 2020 lockdowns, he waited eight months for medical treatment for blood in his urine before bladder cancer surgery in November 2020.

“I’m pretty beat up,” he said. But the pandemic put him on high alert. “I was paying attention to the news quite intently. I’m former military and I wanted to make sure that I was prepared for whatever was coming.”

As a former case manager for the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, Connolly was responsible for advocating for the mentally ill including severe schizophrenics, bipolar and dual-diagnosis patients with substance abuse, and a client so violent he spent most of his life in Worcester State Hospital with a double lobotomy.

Connolly, who knew his way around hospitals and the medical system, was immediately suspicious of calls to lock down to “flatten the curve.”

“Something didn’t sit right with me,” he said. “I’m all about I get to do what I want to do because I’m a free man. I started driving to local hospitals to see them overrun and they were ghost towns.”

Connolly told The Defender:

“I spent a lot of time in hospitals with my clients. I wore masks and gowns and gloves depending on the contagion. But you don’t shut a hospital down. You don’t sequester healthy people if there’s something contagious going around. You isolate the sick.

“Things weren’t adding up for me — and then my friend got sick.”

Connolly had known his friend Keith, 59, in AA for 13 years. “He was a relatively healthy guy and had been sober for 13 years, and suddenly his abdomen began to distend, he was very, very sick.”

While battling his bladder cancer, Connolly served as Keith’s health proxy. He accompanied his friend to the doctor as he would with his clients as case manager, “responsible for every aspect of someone’s care — housing, food, medical, legal, everything.”

More things didn’t add up at the doctor’s office.

“The doctors told Keith he had liver cancer,” Connolly said. “But his death certificate said he died of end-stage liver disease, cirrhosis. But he was sober for 13 years. How the hell did cirrhosis kill him? Cirrhosis is a long, slow death.”

“I wasn’t there to argue with the doctors, but I was very suspicious. Keith died 60 days after getting the vaccine.”

After his friend’s death, Connolly devoured every scrap of information he could find about the post-vax excess death crisis from Dowd, Kory, Dr. Paul Marik, Dr. Ryan Cole and others. “I became an activist.”

Connolly did what seemingly no one else had thought to do. He “spent an enormous amount of time” obsessively reading obituaries of those who died too soon or of unknown causes, looking for clues.

“Ed Dowd was doing the actuary data and I’m not a big brain,” Connolly said. “I got a high school diploma, I worked my way up to a master’s level based on experience, very little college, self-taught. But I started seeing these guys with big brains, Ryan Cole, Dowd. I wanted to participate somehow.”

In December 2022, Connolly heard Beaudoin interviewed on CHD.TV by Dr. Meryl Nass. He was stunned by the Massachusetts man’s story and data.

Beaudoin, 59, is an electrical engineer and systems engineer whose son died in a motorcycle accident in 2018. He was sitting around depressed, “not working, not doing anything,” when COVID-19 hit and his middle son said, “It’s all B.S.”

“I said, Charlie, you got to take it seriously, so I went to prove him wrong — and within a week, I proved him right. I found CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] data and New York City data and the story wasn’t matching.”

Beaudoin enrolled in law school, but was thrown out for being unvaccinated. He sued Massachusetts and the federal government for vaccine data and the law school for tossing him out. In his new role as an activist, working with Steve Kirsch, Jessica Rose, Ph.D., and others, he struck gold with a Freedom of Information Act request that gave him the entire death certificate database of Massachusetts.

Beaudoin has been talking to groups and media ever since. His extensive analysis of 460,000 death certificates has made him “one of the unsung heroes of the pandemic.”

The death certificate data show a massive, illegal cover-up in Massachusetts of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine damage, Beaudoin said, that he will document in a forthcoming book.

“In Massachusetts alone in 2021 and 2022, there were 3,000 excess cardiac arrest deaths, 500 excess pulmonary embolism deaths, 400 excess cardiac arrhythmia deaths, hundreds of excess clotting and bleeding and blood vessel and stroke deaths.”

All were temporally associated with the mRNA vaccine rollout, Beaudoin said.

Beaudoin also produced data showing that COVID-19 killed Massachusetts residents in 2020, average age of 81, seasonally and with respiratory diseases. But far more Bay Staters have died since the 2021 vax rollout, now average age 65 with no seasonality, and a sudden shift “to circulatory and blood causes” of death.

For those who insist excess deaths are COVID-19-caused, Beaudoin said, “Diseases do not change how they kill, whom they kill and when they kill suddenly on a year boundary.”

Stunned by Beaudoin’s research, Connolly drove to rural Keene, New Hampshire, last Feb. 18 to hear Beaudoin give his death certificate presentation in the small Hope Chapel.

The event was sponsored by Health Freedom New Hampshire and the CHD New England Chapter.

After the presentation, Connolly, stricken and hurting, approached Beaudoin and introduced himself.

“I felt really badly for him,” Beaudoin said in an interview with The Defender. “He was telling me about friends and acquaintances at Alcoholics Anonymous, all disappearing, this guy died, that guy died. He was angry at the COVID-19 vaccine situation, but wanted to do something positive to prevent others from being harmed or killed.”

The two men exchanged information. Connolly barraged Beaudoin for days with screen-captured obits he’d found on his phone with the words “suddenly” or “unexpectedly.” Beaudoin looked up the death certificates and told Connolly the official causes of death.

Then, “Steve came up with a great idea,” Beaudoin said. “He found an online data tool embedded in a national obituary website, Legacy.com. Steve utilized the website’s advanced search tool to filter obituaries for the keywords “suddenly” and “unexpectedly.” He then filtered by date range and U.S. state.”

Connolly populated a multi-use spreadsheet Beaudoin created with the number of instances of “suddenly” or “unexpectedly” for every U.S. state and the years 2015 through Aug. 21, 2023.

The results stunned both men.

“Steve has the heart and zeal of a lion,” Beaudoin said, and “the results are staggering and incontrovertible.”

He called Connolly’s data “strong pragmatic evidence, corroborative of the insurance data highlighted by Ed Dowd, that there is a public health emergency manifesting in an astronomical increase in sudden fatalities since 2021.”

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/steve-connolly-obituaries-words-suddenly-unexpectedly-covid-vaccine/

US Draws Up Plan to Attack Mainland Yemen as Middle East Spirals Into War

[AP Photo/Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Riley Gasdia/U.S. Navy]

Global Research

The US military has “prepared options” for attacking Yemen, the Wall Street Journal reported, amid a major escalation of war throughout the Middle East. The Journal reported that “potential targets could include launchers for antiship missiles and drones, targeting infrastructure such as coastal radar installations, and storage facilities for munitions.”

In a threat to Yemen, White House National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said Wednesday the US will not “shrink from the task of defending ourselves, our interests, our partners, and the free flow of international commerce.”

He added,

“To accomplish these goals we have established and will continue to maintain a significant force presence in the Middle East. This includes an aircraft carrier strike group centered around the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower, with its embarked air wing of some 80 aircraft, as well as an amphibious ready group with its embarked 26 Marine Expeditionary Unit.”

These ships, Kirby said, contain “more than 4,000 sailors and more than 50 aircraft.” He added,

“These ships and their Marines are augmented by three additional squadrons of fighter and attack aircraft that are based ashore and additional highly capable warships at sea.” These ships, Kirby said, represent “offensive … military power.”

The belligerent statements cap two days of major escalations of tensions throughout the Middle East. On Tuesday, Israel carried out a strike in Beirut, Lebanon, killing Saleh al-Arouri, the deputy head of Hamas’s political committee. While Israel denied its responsibility for the strike, US officials later confirmed to Al Jazeera that the attack was conducted by Israel.

The US effectively endorsed the murder of al-Arouri, with White House spokesman Kirby declaring that Israel “has a right and responsibility to go after the threat that Hamas poses, which means they have a right and a responsibility to go after the leadership of Hamas.” He added,

“I would just tell you that al-Arouri was a noted ‘designated global terrorist.’ And if he is, in fact, dead, nobody should be shedding a tear over his loss.”

Then, on Wednesday, over 100 people were killed at a memorial ceremony for Maj. Gen. Qassemi Soleimani, the Iranian general murdered by US President Donald Trump while on a diplomatic mission in Iraq four years ago. While Israel has for years carried out a string of bombings throughout Iran, in this case both the United States and Israel denied responsibility.

Mojataba Zolnouri, Iran’s deputy Parliament head, said that it was “clear from the style of the attacks that it is the Zionist regime” which is responsible for the bombing. But White House spokesman Kirby declared, “We have no indication that Israel was in any way involved in this.”

Last week, Defense Minister Yoav Gallant claimed that Israel is at “war” with multiple countries.

“We are in a multi-front war. We are being attacked from seven fronts—Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Judea and Samaria (the West Bank), Iraq, Yemen and Iran,” he said. “We have already responded and acted on six of those fronts,” in a clear threat to Iran.

The US media continues to incite direct war against Iran. On the day in which 100 people were killed in a terror attack on Iran, the Wall Street Journal published an editorial calling Iran “the fulcrum of Mideast violence,” and declaring,

“Sooner or later the US and its allies will have to reestablish deterrence if they want a more stable Middle East, and that means dealing with Iran.”

This week, Israel announced that thousands of troops would be withdrawn from Gaza, raising the prospect that they will be used in an attack on Lebanon. Israel has evacuated 70,000 residents from its northern border with Lebanon and has amassed troops and tanks there. Israeli forces have launched daily bombardments across the Lebanese border since October 7.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken will depart Thursday to the Middle East, including a trip to Israel. The death toll in Israel’s genocide is quickly nearing 30,000, with Gaza’s Government Media Office declaring that 29,313 people in Gaza are either killed or missing since October 7.

Against the backdrop of escalating war throughout the region, the US has been thrown into crisis by the Israeli regime’s openly genocidal rhetoric. In a statement on Tuesday, US Ambassador to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield declared,

“There should be no mass displacement of Palestinians from Gaza, and we reject the recent inflammatory statements from Israeli Ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir.”

In a separate statement, the US State Department declared,

“The United States rejects recent statements from Israeli Ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir advocating for the resettlement of Palestinians outside of Gaza. This rhetoric is inflammatory and irresponsible. We have been told repeatedly and consistently by the Government of Israel, including by the Prime Minister, that such statements do not reflect the policy of the Israeli government. They should stop immediately.”

Regardless of what the United States claims it was told in private, Netanyahu has categorically endorsed the ethnic cleansing of Gaza in public, telling a meeting of his parliamentary faction, “Regarding voluntary immigration… This is the direction we are going in.”

Of course, these statements do in fact represent the policies of the Israeli government, which is engaged in a conscious genocide and ethnic cleansing campaign against Gaza. The United States, which declares it has no “red lines” on what Israel is allowed to do, is fully complicit in this genocide.

On Thursday, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) announced that it will hold public hearings January 11 and 12 on South Africa’s accusation that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza. The United States, however, continues to deny that Israel is committing genocide and that the US is an accomplice to it. “We have not at this point seen acts that constitute genocide,” said State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller.

Asked to comment on the filing by South Africa with the ICJ, White House spokesman Kirby called the submission “meritless, counterproductive and completely without any basis in fact whatsoever.”

(Unlike the International Criminal Court [ICC], which hears charges against individuals, the International Court of Justice hears charges by UN member states against other states. The US government does not recognize the ICC but does recognize the ICJ, and its current chair, Joan Donoghue, is an American.)

Public denunciations of Israel’s genocide by human rights experts are mounting. In a statement on Twitter, Balakrishnan Rajagopal, UN Special Rapporteur on the right to housing, declared,

“Forcible transfer of Gazan population is an act of genocide especially given the high number of children.”

On Wednesday, the Euro-Med Human Rights monitor declared in a statement that “Israel is determined to carry out the forcible displacement of civilians in the Gaza Strip, beyond the bounds of international law.”

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-draws-up-plan-attack-mainland-yemen-middle-east-spirals-into-war/5845120

Over 200 Service Members Demand Biden’s Military Leadership be Court-martialed for Forced ‘Experimentation’ on Troops with COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate

Global Research

Over 200 active duty and retired service members are vowing to hold the Biden administration accountable for ‘trampling’ on their rights by enforcing the COVID-19 vaccine mandate. 

The mandate enacted in August 2021 led to the forced firing of over 8,000 service members who refused the shot on religious or medical grounds.

On New Year’s Day, over 200 service members declared that they will do ‘everything’ in their power to get accountability since not a single leader has resigned or been held to account despite the rollback of the vaccine mandate last year.

In a letter obtained by DailyMail.com, the current and former troops accuse Biden’s military brass of ‘continuing to ignore’ their pleas to correct the ‘injuries and laws that were broken.’

They are threatening to even force Biden’s top leaders to be brought out of retirement so they can be court-martialed and held to account.

‘While implementing the COVID-19 vaccine mandate, military leaders broke the law, trampled constitutional rights, denied informed consent, permitted unwilling medical experimentation, and suppressed the free exercise of religion,’ the letter states. (Daily Mail)

See the list of signatories here.

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/over-200-service-members-demand-biden-military-leadership-court-martialed-fired-forced-experimentation-troops-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-leaving-significant-physical-mental-scars/5845134

Facebook Approves Israeli Ad Calling for Assassination of Pro-Palestine Activist

https://theintercept.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/AP23052312606318-facebook-israel-palestine-post-moderation.jpg?fit=2500%2C1250

The Intercept

After the ad was discovered, digital rights advocates ran an experiment testing the limits of Facebook’s machine-learning moderation.

A series of advertisements dehumanizing and calling for violence against Palestinians, intended to test Facebook’s content moderation standards, were all approved by the social network, according to materials shared with The Intercept.

The submitted ads, in both Hebrew and Arabic, included flagrant violations of policies for Facebook and its parent company Meta. Some contained violent content directly calling for the murder of Palestinian civilians, like ads demanding a “holocaust for the Palestinians” and to wipe out “Gazan women and children and the elderly.” Other posts, like those describing kids from Gaza as “future terrorists” and a reference to “Arab pigs,” contained dehumanizing language.

“The approval of these ads is just the latest in a series of Meta’s failures towards the Palestinian people,” Nadim Nashif, founder of the Palestinian social media research and advocacy group 7amleh, which submitted the test ads, told The Intercept. “Throughout this crisis, we have seen a continued pattern of Meta’s clear bias and discrimination against Palestinians.”

7amleh’s idea to test Facebook’s machine-learning censorship apparatus arose last month, when Nashif discovered an ad on his Facebook feed explicitly calling for the assassination of American activist Paul Larudee, a co-founder of the Free Gaza Movement. Facebook’s automatic translation of the text ad read: “It’s time to assassinate Paul Larudi [sic], the anti-Semitic and ‘human rights’ terrorist from the United States.” Nashif reported the ad to Facebook, and it was taken down.

The ad had been placed by Ad Kan, a right-wing Israeli group founded by former Israel Defense Force and intelligence officers to combat “anti-Israeli organizations” whose funding comes from purportedly antisemitic sources, according to its website. (Neither Larudee nor Ad Kan immediately responded to requests for comment.)

Calling for the assassination of a political activist is a violation of Facebook’s advertising rules. That the post sponsored by Ad Kan appeared on the platform indicates Facebook approved it despite those rules. The ad likely passed through filtering by Facebook’s automated process, based on machine-learning, that allows its global advertising business to operate at a rapid clip.

“Our ad review system is designed to review all ads before they go live,” accordingOpens in a new tab to a Facebook ad policy overview. As Meta’s human-based moderation, which historically relied almost entirely on outsourced contractor labor, has drawn greater scrutiny and criticism, the company has come to lean more heavily on automated text-scanning software to enforce its speech rules and censorship policies.

While these technologies allow the company to skirt the labor issues associated with human moderators, they also obscure how moderation decisions are made behind secret algorithms.

Last year, an external audit commissioned by Meta found that while the company was routinely using algorithmic censorship to delete Arabic posts, the company had no equivalent algorithm in place to detect “Hebrew hostile speech” like racist rhetoric and violent incitement. Following the audit, Meta claimed it had “launched a Hebrew ‘hostile speech’ classifier to help us proactively detect more violating Hebrew content.” Content, that is, like an ad espousing murder.

Incitement to Violence on Facebook

Amid the Israeli war on Palestinians in Gaza, Nashif was troubled enough by the explicit call in the ad to murder Larudee that he worried similar paid posts might contribute to violence against Palestinians.

Large-scale incitement to violence jumping from social media into the real world is not a mere hypothetical: In 2018, United Nations investigators foundOpens in a new tab violently inflammatory Facebook posts played a “determining role” in Myanmar’s Rohingya genocide. (Last year, another group ran test ads inciting against Rohingya, a project along the same lines as 7amleh’s experiment; in that case, all the ads were also approvedOpens in a new tab.)

The quick removal of the Larudee post didn’t explain how the ad was approved in the first place. In light of assurances from Facebook that safeguards were in place, Nashif and 7amleh, which formally partners with Meta on censorship and free expression issues, were puzzled.

“Meta has a track record of not doing enough to protect marginalized communities.”

Curious if the approval was a fluke, 7amleh created and submitted 19 ads, in both Hebrew and Arabic, with text deliberately, flagrantly violating company rules — a test for Meta and Facebook. 7amleh’s ads were designed to test the approval process and see whether Meta’s ability to automatically screen violent and racist incitement had gotten better, even with unambiguous examples of violent incitement.

“We knew from the example of what happened to the Rohingya in Myanmar that Meta has a track record of not doing enough to protect marginalized communities,” Nashif said, “and that their ads manager system was particularly vulnerable.”

Meta’s appears to have failed 7amleh’s test.

The company’s Community Standards rulebook — which ads are supposed to comply with to be approved — prohibit not just text advocating for violence, but also any dehumanizing statements against people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, or nationality. Despite this, confirmation emails shared with The Intercept show Facebook approved every single ad.

Though 7amleh told The Intercept the organization had no intention to actually run these ads and was going to pull them before they were scheduled to appear, it believes their approval demonstrates the social platform remains fundamentally myopic around non-English speech — languages used by a great majority of its over 4 billion users. (Meta retroactively rejected 7amleh’s Hebrew ads after The Intercept brought them to the company’s attention, but the Arabic versions remain approved within Facebook’s ad system.)

Facebook spokesperson Erin McPike confirmed the ads had been approved accidentally. “Despite our ongoing investments, we know that there will be examples of things we miss or we take down in error, as both machines and people make mistakes,” she said. “That’s why ads can be reviewed multiple times, including once they go live.”

Just days after its own experimental ads were approved, 7amleh discovered an Arabic ad run by a group calling itself “Migrate Now” calling on “Arabs in Judea and Sumaria” — the name Israelis, particularly settlers, use to refer to the occupied Palestinian West Bank — to relocate to Jordan.

According to Facebook documentation>, automated, software-based screening is the “primary method” used to approve or deny ads. But it’s unclear if the “hostile speech” algorithms used to detect violent or racist posts are also used in the ad approval process. In its official response to last year’s audit, Facebook said its new Hebrew-language classifier would “significantly improve” its ability to handle “major spikes in violating content,” such as around flare-ups of conflict between Israel and Palestine. Based on 7amleh’s experiment, however, this classifier either doesn’t work very well or is for some reason not being used to screen advertisements. (McPike did not answer when asked if the approval of 7amleh’s ads reflected an underlying issue with the hostile speech classifier.)

Either way, according to Nashif, the fact that these ads were approved points to an overall problem: Meta claims it can effectively use machine learning to deter explicit incitement to violence, while it clearly cannot.

“We know that Meta’s Hebrew classifiers are not operating effectively, and we have not seen the company respond to almost any of our concerns,” Nashif said in his statement. “Due to this lack of action, we feel that Meta may hold at least partial responsibility for some of the harm and violence Palestinians are suffering on the ground.”

The approval of the Arabic versions of the ads come as a particular surprise following a recent report by the Wall Street JournalOpens in a new tab that Meta had lowered the level of certainty its algorithmic censorship system needed to remove Arabic posts — from 80 percent confidence that the post broke the rules, to just 25 percent. In other words, Meta was less sure that the Arabic posts it was suppressing or deleting actually contained policy violations.

Nashif said, “There have been sustained actions resulting in the silencing of Palestinian voices.”

[…]

Via https://theintercept.com/2023/11/21/facebook-ad-israel-palestine-violence/

Florida Surgeon General Calls for Halt in Use of COVID mRNA Vaccines

Joseph Ladapo photo credit: The Florida Department of Health

By  Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.

In a statement released today, Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, M.D., Ph.D., said the U.S. Food and Drug Administration failed to adequately respond to questions he raised in a letter last month about mRNA technology delivering DNA contaminants into people’s cells.

In a statement released today by the Florida Department of Health, Ladapo said the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) failed to adequately respond to questions he raised about the issue in a letter sent last month to the FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Ladapo asked the agencies to address the recent discovery of host cell DNA fragments in the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines. Scientists studying the vaccines found bacterial DNA left over from the microscopic plasmids used for multiplying DNA in the mRNA vaccine manufacturing process.

One of the gene therapy tools discovered in COVID-19 vaccines is SV40, which is known to be cancer-promoting.

Ladapo’s letter said the presence of these fragments was particularly concerning given that the mRNA shots use lipid nanoparticles, which he said are “an efficient vehicle for delivery of mRNA in the COVID-19 vaccines into human cells, and may therefore be an equally efficient vehicle for delivering contaminant DNA into human cells.”

He asked the agencies to explain whether the risks of contaminant DNA being integrated into human cells had been assessed, per the agencies’ own guidelines, especially given the new risk factors introduced by the use of lipid nanoparticles.

In the FDA’s response, Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the FDA, reiterated that the agency is “confident in the quality, safety, and effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines.”

Marks also said that “on first principle, it is quite ‘implausible’ that residual small DNA fragments” could “find their way into the nucleus,” of cells and be incorporated into chromosomal DNA. He added that the FDA’s pharmacovigilance data on hundreds of millions of individuals “indicate no evidence indicative of genotoxicity.”

The real challenge facing the FDA, Marks said, is “the ongoing proliferation of misinformation and disinformation about these vaccines which results in vaccine hesitancy that lowers vaccine uptake.”

Ladapo said the response did not sufficiently address his concerns.

“The FDA’s response does not provide data or evidence that the DNA integration assessments they recommended themselves have been performed,” Ladapo said. “Instead, they pointed to genotoxicity studies — which are inadequate assessments for DNA integration risk.”

In his statement, Ladapo reiterated that “DNA integration poses a unique and elevated risk to human health and to the integrity of the human genome, including the risk that DNA integrated into sperm or egg gametes could be passed onto offspring of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine recipients.”

“If the risks of DNA integration have not been assessed for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, these vaccines are not appropriate for use in human beings,” Ladapo said.

An outspoken critic of COVID policies

Ladapo, a distinguished graduate of Harvard Medical School and well-published medical researcher, gained prominence early in the pandemic for arguing that fear — not sound public health science — was driving public messaging around COVID-19.

He published a series of articles in USA Today and The Wall Street Journal criticizing lockdown measures and arguing the health system “would be less burdened if more patients were treated before they require hospitalization, and there are promising therapeutic options that patients can administer themselves at home.”

Ladapo’s outspokenness and his approach to handling the pandemic caught the eye of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who appointed him as the state’s surgeon general in September 2021.

Since then, he has been vocal in challenging federal policies and recommendations related to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines and calling for agency accountability.

He issued an alert in Feb. 2022 to the Florida healthcare sector and the public warning that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines caused a “substantial increase” in reports of adverse events in Florida.

In March 2022, Ladapo recommended against COVID-19 vaccines for healthy children, making Florida the first state to break with official guidance from the CDC.

Last year he recommended against anyone under the age of 65 getting new COVID-19 vaccine boosters.

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/florida-joseph-ladapo-halt-covid-mrna-vaccines/?utm_id=20240103

Scientific Dissent from Global Warming Predictions

Zero Hedge

[…]

The climate change dogma is roughly this:

  • The concentration of carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere has increased markedly over the past century (true);
  • human activities have contributed to that increase (true);
  • Earth has warmed by more than a degree since escaping the harsh Little Ice Age in the 19th century (also true, thank goodness!);
  • temperatures will continue to rise to dangerous, catastrophe-inducing levels (unproven, unknowable, and unlikely) unless human society is radically transformed by drastically curbing the human use of fossil fuels (a power-seeking agenda that would inflict widespread impoverishment and suffering on billions of human beings).

[…]

Here are several recent examples of scientific dissent from the alarmist projections of the climate change cult:

  • In Hydrological Sciences Journal, Demetris Koutsoyiannis and Christos Vournas found that the post-1900 increase in the CO2 concentration (from 300 parts per million to 420 parts per million) “has not altered, in a discernible manner, the greenhouse effect, which remains dominated by the quantity of water vapour in the atmosphere.”
  • Writing in the journal Earth’s Future, W. Jackson Davis “documents an overall negative correlation between global temperatures and atmospheric CO2 concentrations over the last 210 million years,” according to NoTricksZone.com. A “negative correlation” —i.e., when the atmospheric concentration of CO2 rises, more often than not temperatures fall.
  • Like other scientists in earlier years, Allan T. Emrén, writing in the International Journal of Global Warming, “found that the rate of change in CO2 concentration is controlled by global temperature rather than vice versa.”
  • Norwegians John K. Dagsvik and Sigmund H. Moen (a statistician and civil engineer, respectively), writing in a Statistics Norway discussion paper, concluded that “the effect of man-made CO2 emissions does not appear strong enough to cause systematic changes in the temperature fluctuations during the last 200 years.”
  • Other scientists believe that the “hottest ever” summer that the climate change cult has hyped in 2023 (which actually, according to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration data, was the 15th hottest since 1910 on mean temperatures and 22nd hottest for maximum temperatures) wasn’t triggered by CO2, but by a significant increase in solar radiation and/or by the 2022 eruption of the Tonga-Hunga volcano having caused a 10 percent increase in water vapor in the atmosphere.
  • Perhaps the greatest challenge to the climate change cultists’ belief that CO2 will cause catastrophic global warming is a study published in Nature partner journal Climate and Atmospheric Science by H. Nair and colleagues. Those scientists came to the arresting conclusion that “we would expect from a 100% switchover from fossil fuels to zero-emission renewables, the net radiative heating would increase drastically.”
  • This, according to NoTricksZone.com, is due to “a dramatic reduction in climate-cooling aerosol (pollution) emissions,“ and, ”because aerosol emissions have a relatively greater climate impact by reflecting shortwave radiation, the net effect of transitioning to renewables will be to ‘drastically’ increase Earth’s temperatures over the coming decades.”

The above examples of scientific studies running counter to climate-change-cult orthodoxy indicate that the science surrounding the issue is anything but settled in the alarmists’ favor.

[…]

Via https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/ominous-rumblings-climate-change-cult

 

US slams ‘irresponsible’ calls by Smotrich and Ben Gvir for emigration of Gazans

Religious Zionist party leader MK Bezalel Smotrich (right) with Otzma Yehudit party leader MK Itamar Ben Gvir in the Knesset plenum, December 28, 2022. (Olivier Fitoussi/Flash90)

Religious Zionist party leader MK Bezalel Smotrich (right) with Otzma Yehudit party leader MK Itamar Ben Gvir in the Knesset plenum, December 28, 2022. (Olivier Fitoussi/Flash90)

Times of Israel

State Dept issues rare, unprompted critique of ministers by name, days after Biden pressed PM to rein in far-right partners; Ben Gvir unfazed: ‘We are not another star in the US flag’

The US State Department on Tuesday called out far-right Israeli ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir for advocating the resettlement of Palestinians outside of Gaza.

“This rhetoric is inflammatory and irresponsible,” State Department spokesman Matthew Miller said in a relatively rare, unprompted statement calling out a pair of Israeli ministers by name.

The statement underscored growing frustration in Washington with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, which the Biden administration has continued to support diplomatically and militarily in the war against Hamas but has increasingly sparred with regarding planning for Gaza once the fighting ends.

For months, Netanyahu has bucked US requests to begin planning for who will govern the Gaza Strip after the war, ostensibly recognizing that his far-right coalition partners would reject proposals that do not include Israel’s re-occupation and re-settlement of Gaza — which the security establishment, Washington and even the premier himself oppose.

After weeks of silence on the issue, Netanyahu began what two US officials last month characterized to The Times of Israel as a “political campaign,” in which he has repeatedly vowed not to allow the Palestinian Authority to again rule Gaza.

While rejecting the PA’s return, Netanyahu has offered few details on what political entity he wants to rule Gaza. His aides have spoken to reporters on condition of anonymity about the idea of “local Palestinian clan leaders” governing the Strip.

Other right-wing members of the coalition, though, have been more forthcoming about their visions for Gaza after the war, expressing support for encouraging Palestinians to emigrate from Gaza and reestablishing settlements there.

Netanyahu has not personally addressed the uproar over such calls, which in recent days received a major boost from Smotrich and Ben Gvir, but his office has issued statements insisting they do not represent government policy.

“We want to encourage willful emigration, and we need to find countries willing to take them in,” Smotrich told Channel 12 on Saturday

“We cannot withdraw from any territory we are in in the Gaza Strip. Not only do I not rule out Jewish settlement there, I believe it is also an important thing,” Ben Gvir said in a faction meeting on Monday.

The war presents an “opportunity to concentrate on encouraging the migration of the residents of Gaza,” Ben Gvir told reporters and members of his far-right Otzma Yehudit party, calling such a policy “a correct, just, moral and humane solution.”

Responding to these comments following the long holiday weekend in the US, the State Department’s spokesman said Tuesday, “We have been told repeatedly and consistently by the government of Israel, including by the prime minister, that such statements do not reflect the policy of the Israeli government. They should stop immediately.”

Miller’s statement came days after US President Joe Biden reportedly took Netanyahu to task on a phone call for failing to stand up to the hardliners in his coalition, which he said he’s done with the far-left flank of the Democratic party that is urging a ceasefire in Gaza. Biden was taking particular issue with Israel’s decision to withhold tens of millions of dollars in Palestinian tax revenues from the PA. Smotrich reiterated his refusal as finance minister to transfer a single shekel to the PA.

Biden called out Ben Gvir publicly last month, lamenting that “Ben Gvir and company and the new folks don’t want anything remotely approaching a two-state solution.”

As for the US position on Israeli settlements in Gaza, Miller reiterated, “We have been clear, consistent and unequivocal that Gaza is Palestinian land and will remain Palestinian land, with Hamas no longer in control of its future and with no terror groups able to threaten Israel.”

That stance appeared to put the US at odds with mainstream Israeli leaders such as Defense Minister Yoav Gallant and war cabinet minister Benny Gantz, who have called for the IDF to establish a security buffer zone in Gaza after the war.

“That is the future we seek in the interests of Israelis and Palestinians, the surrounding region and the world,” Miller added.

While Smotrich did not immediately respond to the US statement, Ben Gvir quickly issued a retort brushing off the criticism.

“I really admire the United States of America but with all due respect, we are not another star in the American flag,” Ben Gvir tweeted, repeating the same phrase he has previously used to respond to criticism from Washington.

“The United States is our best friend, but before everything else, we will do what is good for the State of Israel: The emigration of hundreds of thousands from Gaza will allow residents [of the border area] to return home and live in security and protect IDF soldiers,” the far-right minister added.

The State Department’s criticism was echoed by US Ambassador to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield, who tweeted, “There should be no mass displacement of Palestinians from Gaza, and we reject the recent inflammatory statements from Israeli Ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir.”

Also calling out Smotrich was Rabbi Rick Jacobs, who heads the the Reform movement, the largest US Jewish denomination.

“We condemn Israeli Minister Smotrich’s call for ethnic cleansing,” Jacobs wrote on X. “Along with most major American Jewish leaders, we have refused to meet with him to sanction his politics and beliefs.”

[…]

Via https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-slams-irresponsible-calls-by-smotrich-and-ben-gvir-for-emigration-of-gazans/

Triggers of the French Revolution: The Enlightenment, the Little Ice Age and Capitalism

Scene from the Marriage of Figaro

Episode 2: Privilege in Old Regime France

Living the French Revolution and Age of Napoleon

Dr Suzanne M Desan

Film Review

Eighteenth century French Enlightenment philosophers were the first to publicly argue that the privileged role of kings and aristocrats should be based on merit rather than birthright. France’s most popular 18th century play, Beaumarchais’s Marriage of Figaro by Beaumarchais, openly mocked traditional European notions of hereditary power. After government censors outlawed its public production, intellectuals disseminated it widely in private salons. It eventually became so popular that the censors relented in 1784. It immediately became a smash hit.

The plot concerns the traditional right feudal of feudal lords to sleep with their peasants’ brides before their husbands id. The role of Figaro, portrayed as a crafty servant who repeatedly outwits his master, was extremely effective in channeling popular anger about the immoral behavior of French aristocrats.

Belonging to the French aristocracy gave you numerous special privileges. One of the most important was exemption from all taxes. In 1789 (the date of the French revolution), all peasants still signed contracts to provide game, livestock and produce to their feudal lords. In addition, they were charged dues to use their lord’s mills, ovens and wine presses.

Other Factors Driving the French Revolution

The anger driving the French Revolution (which occurred near the end of the Little Ice Age) was also fueled by years of poor harvests and high food prices. Owing to heavy rains and short growing seasons, all European peasants experienced repeated crop failures. Their struggle to find sufficient food to survive was aggravated by a simultaneous population boom.

There was also an extensive urban poor during the late 18th century, half of whom were too poor to be listed on the tax rolls. Global capitalism officially came into existence during the 1700s, creating increasing wealth for urban professionals (bankers, merchants and slave traders). Most of this wealth derived from booming overseas trade in slaves, sugar, coffee, calico and muslin from India, Persian carpets and porcelain and painted cabinets and screens from China.

According to Deson, capitalism itself called into question the old system of privilege as rich urban traders bought (or acquired by marriage) aristocratic titles while nobles married into merchant families to acquire a share of France’s new wealth.*


*If a noble himself engaged in business, they lost the tax-free status enjoyed by the aristocratic class and had to pay tax like commoners.

Film can be viewed free with a library card on Kanopy.

https://www.kanopy.com/en/pukeariki/video/149323/149327

Indonesia and Mauritania report vaccine-derived polio cases

Lisa Schnirring

CIDRAP

Two countries reported new polio cases this week, including Mauritania, which reported its first circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 (cVDPV2) case of the year, according the latest weekly update from the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI).

Indonesia’s patient is from Central Java province on the island of Java, and the illness marks the country’s fourth such case of the year.

Meanwhile, the cVDPV2 case from Mauritania was detected in the Nouakchott Nord region in the southwest of the country. The area includes the country’s capital and largest city, Nouakchott.

[…]

Via https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/polio/indonesia-and-mauritania-report-vaccine-derived-polio-cases

Disability Claims Among Women Shot Up 55% After Rollout of COVID Vaccines

By  Mike Capuzzo

Financial analyst and data expert Edward Dowd said a new U.S. Department of Labor disability survey shows employed men and women ages 16-64 reported record harms since February 2021, with women suffering an unprecedented 55% increase in disabilities.

Since February 2021, more than 1 million working U.S. women ages 16-64 have told the U.S. Department of Labor they are disabled, according to a new government report.

Doctors and scientists who spoke with The Defender attributed the unprecedented 55% increase in disabilities to the rollout of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, although the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) maintains the vaccines are safe and effective and recommends them for everyone age 6 months and older.

But according to former BlackRock fund manager Edward Dowd, the rise in disability claims represents an ongoing silent catastrophe — one that public health officials and major media are ignoring.

Dowd, the first to report the historic rise in excess U.S. deaths and disabilities in his book, “‘Cause Unknown’: The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 and 2022,” continues to harvest data overlooked by mainstream media. He issues statistics-rich reports on everything from excess mortality and fertility to U.S. and U.K. disabilities, reported the new U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics monthly disability survey results last month on X (formerly Twitter).

The Department of Labor survey data was issued in graph form by FRED, the acronym for Federal Reserve Economic Data, an online database of hundreds of thousands of interactive data series maintained by the Research Division at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

The monthly report is a survey of respondents self-identifying as disabled and not a claim for disability and monetary compensation, Dowd said.

But the government’s disability survey is an important statistical window into U.S. public health that is tragically predictive of excess deaths, Dowd said. “Morbidity leads to mortality,” he said.

“The data is confirmation that the trend of rising U.S. disability as measured by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics is not abating,” Dowd told The Defender.

“The rise began in earnest in February of 2021, and we have added about 4 million Americans since the vaccination rollout,” he said. “The civilian labor force, employed men and employed women have had a steeper rise than the general population. Unless this issue is addressed it will compromise the labor force over time.”

Dr. James Thorp, a Florida obstetrician and gynecologist who documented catastrophic harm to mothers and children from the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, said he was outraged by the unrelenting health damage to all segments of the U.S. population and the greater victimization of women in the wake of the vaccine rollout.

He pointed to the Pfizer 5.3.6 post-marketing data, part of the 450,000 pages of Pfizer’s internal reports on mRNA vaccine damage in the first 10 weeks of rollout, Dec. 14, 2020, to Feb. 28, 2021.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) tried to keep the Pfizer documents from the public for 75 years, but a judge ordered their release.

Table 1 of the Pfizer report shows the cumulative total of “adverse event reports” and “presents the main characteristics of the overall cases.”  It shows that of 42,086 “relevant cases” of adverse events after being injected with Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine, 1,223 people — 2.9% — died.

The table also shows that Pfizer reported adverse events, including deaths, in 29,914 women and 9,182 men — a rate of harm 3 times greater for women, Thorp said. He blames the disparity partly on the tendency of women to make a family’s health decisions and the likelihood that women rushed out to get the vaccine before persuading men to do so.

Pfizer’s adverse events record also showed the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine caused injuries at a rate, relative to deaths, far beyond those caused by diseases, with an astonishing “injure-to-kill ratio” of 34.4 to 1, Thorp said.

Thorp, a disabled veteran honorably discharged from the U.S. Air Force, said he believes such a dramatic ratio of injuries to deaths is unheard of in the histories of modern warfare or medicine, where typically the ratio of injuries to deaths caused by COVID-19 and other diseases hovers around 3 to 1.

The COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are “the deadliest vaccine-medicine-drug ever rolled out in the history of medicine,” he said.

Asked what disabilities are most common according to the Pfizer reports Thorp said, “We don’t have time for that. More than 1,500 types of injuries” are cataloged in the Pfizer documents, he said.

Amy Kelly, DailyClout chief operating officer and program director for the War Room/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysis Project, said the new disability data offers more clues to the “disappearance of American workers.”

“Even if a working-aged person isn’t vaccine-injured, what if she or he has a vaccine-injured loved one and needs to leave the workforce to be a caregiver?” Kelly asked.

“It’s hard to even fathom the potential scope given the percentage of U.S. citizens who have been COVID vaccinated and boosted.”

The key findings from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data, according to Dowd:

  • More than 1 million working women in the U.S., ages 16-64, have become disabled since the rollout of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, the data indicates. Employed women in the U.S. who tell the Labor Department they are disabled rose an unprecedented 55% from 2.1 million women in February 2021, when Dowd first spotted the trend, to 3.2 million women in November 2023.
  • Employed men and women ages 16-64 suffered a greater rise in disabilities than the general population ages since the widespread mandating of the mRNA vaccines — an unprecedented reversal of industry-wide insurance data that insurance experts cannot explain, as employed Americans have historically been the healthiest segment of the population. Dowd said the evidence strongly suggests the reversal was caused by nationwide vaccine mandates for working people.
  • Approximately 299,000 more Americans ages 16 and over, employed or not, said they were disabled in November, while some 199,000 more Americans ages 16 and over in the civilian labor force told the Labor Department they had a disability.
  • “The bad news is that it appears the breakout in June for the U.S. population 16 and over is holding,” Dowd said. In February 2021, when Dowd first noticed the rapid escalation of disability data, 5,961 Americans ages 16 and over said they had a disability. The number increased to the August high of 8,477 respondents reporting a disability — a 42% jump. The number dropped 1% in November, but the trend of an unprecedented leap in disabilities is holding, Dowd said.
  • Americans are getting sicker at unheard-of rates and the sick are dying at unheard-of rates, Dowd said. In an earlier study covering February 2021 to December 2022, Dowd found “an increase of about 1,400,000 disabilities in the civilian labor force aged 16-64, while there were about 300,000 excess deaths (for the 25-64 age group), during that period.”
  • Dowd said he expects the record disability numbers in November for employed women, and the continuing massive increase in disability for employed men, to translate to continuing record U.S. deaths for the 25-64 employed cohorts. He also expects the data will show a strong correlation between disabilities, deaths and mRNA COVID-19 vaccine updates.
  • Using Labor Department disability statistics, CDC vaccination data, and United Nations population estimates for the period February 2021 — December 2022, Dowd  found “clear evidence of a strong relationship between the Covid-19 vaccination rollout and increases in disability rates.”

“We must always consider other external factors that might explain the rise in disabilities, and which are also correlated to the vaccination data,” Dowd said. “This is usually stated as ‘correlation is not causation.’”

“However, in the absence of other explanatory factors, and strong medical evidence of the vaccines causing injuries and deaths, one must consider the relationship seriously,” he said.

Kelly said the U.S. is witnessing “just the beginning of the vaccine fallout. Babies, toddlers, and children have now been vaccinated and boosted. I got an email today from a woman whose doctor pushed her to get vaccinated when she was four months pregnant. She miscarried that baby and has since had two more miscarriages. Sadly, I receive emails similar to that all the time.”

Dowd said he remains hopeful. “Insurance companies are seeing a rise in long-term disability claims,” he said. “That will come out over time. The establishment is spinning nonsense at this point.”

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/women-disabilities-covid-vaccine/