By Dr. William Makis

Click here to watch the video

VIDEO #1 (ABOVE): Oct.27, 2023 – Chubu-Nippon Broadcasting – Kyoto City Demonstrations by 230 families of COVID-19 Vaccine victims (8:33 min).

VIDEO #2: (Oct.28, 2023) Professor Emeritus Yasufumi Murakami of Tokyo University of Science discusses DNA Contamination of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines and TURBO CANCER (6:34 min)

Click here to watch the video

VIDEO #3: (Nov.8, 2022) Nanoparticles – Professor Masayasu Inoue who is Emeritus Professor at Osaka City University School of Medicine:

Click here to watch the video

“We know that vaccine nanoparticles circulate in the bloodstream for several months. In rats, the half-life is 1 week; in humans, it is 10 weeks. Even though they think it hits the muscle, 99% of the time it hits beyond the muscle. It goes into whole body around in about an hour.

This happens to patients at the vaccination site, and patient goes into anaphylactic shock. So it usually happens on the day of the injection, and the nanoparticles that keep circulating in the blood for a long time are the production of nanoparticles(spike).

The messenger (RNA) and spike proteins were detected in the blood of vaccinated people a few months later There’s even a paper that says they were able to detect it, which means that it circulates and enters the cells of all organs.

The liver and spleen are the most common, but the third is bone marrow. The cell division that creates blood cells is extremely intense. The fourth one gathers in the ovaries, and the fifth and sixth ones have testicular conditions. The vaccine is concentrated in the organs that create the next generation in both women and men.”

VIDEO 04 – (Nov.16, 2023) Clinic Director from Ginza, Tokyo shares his observation on his vaccinated patients (Turbo Cancer):

Click here to watch the video

When we started administering the vaccine, some patients, for example, had been able to control their cancer like pancreatic cancer, for a long time, and after the second or third vaccine, it suddenly became serious, and this May, When the highest number of deaths occurred around June, there were times when around 5 people died per month. Around May and June, we saw the highest number of these cases, with roughly five patients per month succumbing to their illnesses.

Then, we are seeing patients with conditions like giant cell diabetes or light cell leukemia — diseases that are very rare and not often encountered in clinical practice. The cardiovascular specialist told them that they had never seen such diseases before though he read about them in books. I’m still wondering why there are so many people like this.”

VIDEO 05 – (Nov.12, 2023) Announcement from Japanese obstetricians and gynecologists to pregnant women and those who want to become pregnant about the coronavirus vaccine

Click here to watch the video

“Major illnesses and abnormalities that have never been seen before are being found in pregnant women who received the new coronavirus vaccine during or before pregnancy. Pregnant women have a stronger blood clotting effect than usual to protect themselves from bleeding during childbirth. Then, administering the new coronavirus vaccine will make thrombosis much more likely to occur, putting you at greater risk of thrombosis than necessary. Blood clots can occur not only in the pregnant woman but also in the baby, making it difficult for blood to flow to the baby, causing blood clots to get stuck in the placenta, and other dangerous situations. The coronavirus vaccine is currently under research and its safety is not guaranteed. Please make your decisions carefully!”

VIDEO 06 – (Nov. 6, 2023) Japan’s largest national news broadcaster NHK just mentioned COVID-19 vaccine deaths!

Click here to watch the video

Regarding a woman in her 50s in the prefecture who died the day after receiving the new coronavirus vaccine – awarded 44 million yen (approx 300K USD). Nationally, over 2000+ vaccine deaths applications still in process.

VIDEO 07 – Japanese people take to the streets to make the general public aware of the harms of covid vaccines (Oct. 30, 2023)

Click here to read the full article.

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/video-japanese-protesting-sudden-deaths-covid-19-mrna-vaccines/5841617

Rhoda WilsonOn Tuesday, Member of the Netherlands Parliament Wybren van Haga wrote to the World Health Organisation’s (“WHO’s”) Director-General, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, to inform him that the 2022 amendments to the International Health Regulations (“IHR”) are subject to the formal approval by the Dutch Parliament.

“I notify you, in my capacity as Member of Parliament, of the reservation that the 2022 [IHR] amendments require the approval of the Dutch government before the 2022 amendments can enter into force in The Netherlands,” he told Tedros.

In May 2022 the World Health Assembly (“WHA”) quietly agreed to reduce the period during which nations have to opt out of future IHR amendments. For nations to retain the longer 18-month period previously allowed for nations to opt-out, countries need to send WHO a short note that they are opting out of the amendments decided by the WHA in 2022 before 1 December 2023.

“Pursuant to the 2022 Amendments the period for rejection of amendments to the IHR 2005 is reduced from 18 months to 10 months after adoption and notification. The 2022 Amendments reduce the possibility for members of WHO to reject or make reservations to amendments of the IHR 2005. That is why we object to the 2022 Amendments,” Mr. van Haga informed Tedros.

Mr. van Haga requested that Tedros make his letter part of the public record and publish it on WHO’s website. He has sent a copy of his letter to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands, Mrs. Bruins Slot, to the general secretariat of the European Union, to the chair of both houses of the Dutch Parliament and to the chair of the European Parliament.

In June 2023, MP Pepijn van Houwelingen’s parliamentary request to block the Dutch Cabinet from approving the new WHO “treaty” was backed by thirty lawmakers.

The 30 MPs sent a letter to the chair of the Dutch Parliament stating that Parliament’s approval of the 2022 amendments to the IHR was required because these amendments are a treaty or a protocol to a treaty and as such, they require the approval of the Dutch Parliament.

Effectively, instead of adopting WHO’s IHR amendments outright, the Dutch Cabinet must now submit a bill to the House of Representatives, where lawmakers will then debate the bill before it’s put to a vote.

On 25 October, Mr. van Houwelingen tweeted that the government had informed WHO that it does not agree to the 2022 IHR amendments.

Mr. van Haga noted Mr. van Houwelingen’s tweet in his letter to Tedros:

Member of Parliament Pepijn van Houwelingen indicated on Twitter, on October 25th 2023, that a formal notice would be sent on behalf of the Kingdom of The Netherlands to WHO that the 2022 Amendments would be subject to the formal approval by the Dutch Parliament. This notice constitutes a formal reservation on behalf of the Kingdom of The Netherlands that it can only be bound by the 2022 Amendments after the Dutch Parliament has approved the 2022 Amendments [See letter from MP Pepijn van Houwelingen to the Chairman of the House of Representatives dated 21 June 2023 HERE.]

Until now, no evidence of such notice to WHO on the reservation has been received by us. I notify you, in my capacity of Member of Parliament, of the reservation that the 2022 Amendments require the approval of the Dutch Parliament before the 2022 Amendments can enter into force in The Netherlands.

As the group of Members of the European Parliament had done, Mr. van Haga also brought to Tedros’ attention that the IHR amendments were “adopted” in May 2022 “without a normal voting procedure being in place.”

“The chair to the meeting simply asked whether anybody objected to the 2022 Amendments,” Mr. van Haga said and provided a link to THIS video which, at the time of writing this article, is no longer available.

Mr. van Haga’s letter continued:

Pursuant to Article 60 paragraph (b) of the WHO Constitution, General Assembly decisions on other questions than those subject to a two-thirds requirement “shall be made by a majority of the Members present and voting.”

This means that a record must be made of which Members are present and the outcome of the voting procedure. This requirement was not met.

Therefore, the 2022 Amendments must be considered null and void, if there is no proof of a vote.

Pursuant to Article 55 paragraph 2 of the IHR 2005, the text of any proposed amendment needs to be communicated to all States Parties by the Director-General at least 4 months before the Health Assembly. This requirement was also not observed.

You can read Mr. van Haga’s full letter to WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus below, as taken from the article ‘A member of the Dutch Parliament has challenged the WHO’s procedures when the May 2022 amendments were approved’ published by Dr. Meryl Nass.

[…]

Via https://expose-news.com/2023/11/30/netherlands-can-only-be-bound-by-ihr-after/

1. Why didn’t he come out sooner? (He says the data wasn’t truly ready sooner.)
2. Why, when he is suffering such trauma from sitting with these murder statistics, does he still say he is “…not antivaxx?” What, exactly, does it take?
3. Ignore, (if I may,) his commentary about Carl Sagan, Science Heroica, the shape of the earth, how labour/left he is, the streets named after Lenin where he grew up…just look straight at his numbers. It IS interesting that opposing death by Pharma poison is “right wing.” (The two wings are: 1. truth 2. obstruction of truth.)
4. Craig Paardekooper’s site is not “Find My Batch,” it’s “How Bad Is My Batch?” Link here. And here is an interview with Paardekooper from one year ago.
5. Overall: I thank him, believe him, salute him, and hope there are many more like him about to emerge.

Dylan Oakley: “The dam wall around Covid-1984 of lies and deception is about to burst with the weight of truth and disclosure.”

[…]

MAORI WERE ESPECIALLY TARGETED:

See the paid, sophisticated genocide via media here. They had special TV channels reporting in the Mãori native language of ‘te reo Mãori’ (“te reo” means “the language,”) breathlessly on Maori vaccination rates. In one graph, for one region, it’s just under 90%

“Māori Television, a government-funded channel committed to broadcasting primarily in Te Reo, began in March 2004.^{[84]” [Wikipedia]}

God help them. Globalists/Cabal colonialists have found the perfect way to purge indigenous people all over the world in their communist-land grab agenda: First make sure they eat a lot of sugar and junk food, keep them both traumatized and condescended to, then make sure they line up for Government Love in the form of “vaccines,” that are drop dead effective.

Interview clip with Liz Gunn, in which she describes a strong, Maori warrior man breaking down sobbing and telling her: “Liz, I have been to 60 funerals in 11 months. I can’t carry one more coffin.”

This is why Reiner Fuellmich was so hopeful that it would be the Maori who would bring the whole thing down.

[…]

Via https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/new-zealand-database-administrator?r=83qir

As the whistleblower emphasizes, this is a very small country and when you have in a town of 54,000 people like Invercargill one vaccinator who is responsible for continuing to vaccinate men and women when 30% of the vaccinees have passed away, it is shocking and damning, and that person is responsible in all terms of the Nuremberg Laws.

Etruscan prophet Tages

Episode 8 Divination: The Will of the Gods

The Mysterious Etruscans

Dr Steven L Tuck (2016)

Film Review

According to Cicero, the Etruscans introduced divination to Rome. It was used to choose nearly half the Roman kings and set dates for official events, including convening the Senate. Wealthy Roman families sent their sons to Etruscan priests to learn divination. There were three Etruscan books on divination and students of “augury” were expected to memorize them.

Etruscan divination is based on the belief that ll the gods, nymphs and demons overseeing human activity require appeasement. According to Etruscan myth, Tages* (an infant who popped out of the ground while the farmer Tarchan was plowing) provided the original instructions for successful divination. Tarchan would become the first Etruscan priest capable of reading entrails.

According to Tuck, there are four types of divination (Etruscans specialized in the first three):

1. interpreting auspicious signs, such as entrails and flights of birds.

2. Interpreting portents, such as lightning.

3. interpretation offered by oracles (a human being chosen by a deity to deliver divine revelations, communications and predictions).

4. interpretation of dreams

Reading Flights of Birds and Lightening

The Etruscan cosmos was a circle divided into sixteen segments, each overseen by either a major or lesser god. The role of the augur (priest performing the divination) was to observe which segments were traversed by flights of birds or lightning.

The East (left side of the cosmos) represented “familiar” elements, the West hostile elements and the land of the dead. The North, overseen by Ursul the sun god, was the most powerful. Birds flying in the northeast quadrant were the most auspicious (ie represented the most fortunate outcome), those in the northwest quadrant the most disastrous, those in the southeast and southwest quadrants somewhere in between.

According to Tuck, the segmented orientation of of the Etruscan cosmos is responsible for modern day orthogonal city planning (a grid system of involving straight roads and square city blocks).

Reading Entrails

In order to read entrails (usually the liver), the priest had to fast and purify himself before sacrificing the animal providing them. Augury students were trained with a bronze model of a sheep sliver subdivided into 16 regions, each associated with a segment of the cosmos and the associated god.

The Romans would continue Etruscan divination into the 6th century AD. Even Emperor Constantine, who made Christianity Rome’s official religion couldn’t suppress it.

*According to some historians, Tages was also responsible for the first Etruscan calendar, which had only ten months (March to December). The Etruscans adopted the twelve month calendar in the 5th century BC (with October, November and December, derived from Latin for eight, nine and ten, retaining their original names).

Film can be viewed free with a library card on Kanopy.

https://www.kanopy.com/en/pukeariki/watch/video/239710/239623

Hardline pandemic control measures saw Slovenians sanctioned for breaches as minor as eating a sandwich alone outdoors.

Among the tens of thousands expecting a refund is a delivery driver who was infamously photographed surrounded by police after lowering his mask to eat a snack while sitting outdoors well away from anyone else.

The footage of the man, who was fined €400, rankled many Slovenians who considered the police’s enforcement of lockdown instructions to be excessive.

Passed in September, the bill was explicitly framed by the current justice minister, Dominika Švarc Pipan, as an effort to make up for the excesses of pandemic policing under the previous government – or as she put it, “the injustices that were committed against citizens through the abuse of criminal law and unconstitutional and excessive encroachment on human rights”.

Like many nations around the world, Slovenia saw protests against some of its stricter pandemic measures, and not just from relatively extreme anti-vaccine groups.

Among the measures introduced by the right-leaning government were restrictions on movement, assembly and a requirement to wear masks outdoors.

In the country’s last parliamentary election, held in April 2022, that government was replaced by a centre-left coalition. Among the key issues in the campaign was public alarm at the previous administration’s authoritarianism, which many Slovenians worried was taking the country down a path similar to Viktor Orban’s Hungary.

On the night of his election, now-prime minister Robert Golob celebrated “a victory that will enable us to take the country back to freedom”.

[…]

Via https://www.euronews.com/2023/11/29/slovenia-begins-refunding-thousands-of-covid-fines

Craig Murray

Internationalist 360°

At Saturday’s great march in support of Palestine in London, police arrested members of the Communist Party of Great Britain Marxist-Leninist (CPGBML) for having a pamphlet on sale on their stall.

• Harpal-Brar-Zionism: A Racist, Anti-Semitic and Reactionary Tool of Imperialism

The “illegal” pamphlet is entitled Zionism: A Racist, Anti-Semitic and Reactionary Tool of Imperialism.

Just what is illegal about it, I do not know. The authorship is ascribed to the CPGBML. I have looked through it and it is scrupulous in distinguishing between zionism and judaism. Criticism of Israel and of the zionist movement is not anti-semitic.

I suspect what may have upset the authorities are the passages on collaboration between some leaders of the zionist movement and the Nazis.

This is a difficult subject. My own view, which I have discussed both in several articles on this blog and in person with many friends who take a different view, (including Tony Greenstein who has written an entire book on the subject), is that it serves no useful purpose to keep bringing this up. Aberrations of history at a time of great world convulsion, including the events leading up to the Holocaust and that genocide itself, throw up many horrors it is often not helpful to try to tie in to contemporary events.

I see this in Scotland. It appears true that unfortunately a few Scottish nationalists momentarily considered Nazi Germany a possible ally against a common enemy in London. But efforts are made constantly on social media to use that as a meme to portray modern Scottish nationalists as Nazis, which is utter nonsense. Furthermore bringing the Nazis into political debate, especially in anything relating to the Holocaust, immediately causes all kinds of nutters to come out of the woodwork.

Truth is important and true history should always be acknowledged and faced. But I believe my fellow supporters of Palestine do not help today’s debate or the Palestinian cause by dredging up 90-year-old marginal stories.

This particular truth certainly has a place in the history books, but most of the attempts to insert it into current debate are not, in my view, justified.

That, however, is a very different view to saying that books addressing the subject should be banned and people arrested for possessing them. This is a simply appalling attack on freedom of speech. I condemn it unreservedly.

It is also not in the least plain to me where the offence lies.

Is it an offence simply to possess this pamphlet? Does the offence lie rather in displaying it, or in offering to sell it? Is it only an offence to try to sell it at a demonstration? Would it be an offence to sell it in a bookshop? Would it be an offence if it were in a university library for the study of Marxist-Leninist thought?

The pamphlet was published in 2015. Was that an offence at the time? Did anybody who displayed or sold a copy of the pamphlet over the last eight years commit an offence? Is everybody today in possession of a copy committing an offence, including me who has one for the purposes of journalism?

And what offence is it precisely?

The United Nations High Commission for Human Rights has put out a very strong statement on the use of the current attacks on Gaza to damage freedom of expression worldwide:

GENEVA (23 November 2023) – UN experts* today expressed alarm at the worldwide wave of attacks, reprisals, criminalisation and sanctions against those who publicly express solidarity with the victims of the ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine.

“Calls for an end to the violence and attacks in Gaza, or for a humanitarian ceasefire, or criticism of Israeli government’s policies and actions, have in too many contexts been misleadingly equated with support for terrorism or antisemitism. This stifles free expression, including artistic expression, and creates an atmosphere of fear to participate in public life,” the experts said…

“People have the right to express solidarity with victims of grave human rights violations and demand justice, whether from one side or the other or both,” the experts said.

They noted with deep concern that several artists around the world have been targeted because of their art or political messaging, pressured to change topics of artistic expression, and labelled either as troublemakers or as indifferent to the suffering of one side or the other. “Some artists have been deprogrammed and censored for calling for peace, others have lost their jobs, and some artists have been silenced or side-lined by their own cultural organisations and artistic communities,” they said.

Journalists and media outlets in Israel and Western countries reporting critically about Israeli policies and operations in the occupied territories or expressing pro-Palestinian views have been the target of threats, intimidation, discrimination and retaliation, which have increased the risk of self-censorship, undermining the diversity and plurality of news that is essential for press freedom and the right of the public to be informed. At least one media outlet in Israel has been threatened reportedly with closure for perceived “bias” towards Palestine. They also criticised the disproportionate and wrongful removal of pro-Palestinian content by social media platforms.

The experts raised concerns about suspensions and expulsions of students from universities, dismissal of academics, calls for their deportation, threats to dissolve student unions and associations, and restrictions on campus meetings to express solidarity with the suffering civilians in Gaza and denounce the ongoing Israeli military response. Students have also been blacklisted in some universities as supporters of terrorism, with accompanying threats to their prospects for future employment…

The experts noted a highly disturbing trend to criminalise and label pro-Palestinian protests as “hate protests” and to pre-emptively ban them, often citing risks to national security, including risks related to incitement to hatred, without providing evidence-based justification. “Such actions not only violate the right to protest guaranteed by Article 21 of the ICCPR, but are also detrimental to democracy and any peace-building efforts,” they said.

The experts recalled that any restriction on human rights must meet the conditions of legality, necessity and proportionality. “Furthermore, advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to violence, hostility or discrimination is prohibited under international law,” they said, calling on individuals in official positions in particular to desist from hate speech and inflammatory statements…

Alexandra Xanthaki, Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights; Farida Shaheed, Special Rapporteur on the right to education; Clément Nyaletsossi Voule, Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association; Irene Khan, Special Rapporteur on the protection and promotion of freedom of opinion and expression.

The attack on freedom of speech and association is across the western world. Little incidents like this arrest of CPGBML activists, or my own investigation for “terrorism”, are all signs of a real slide towards fascism. Fascism is being enabled by zionism.

As you know, I am not myself a communist. But society is losing touch with the idea that freedom of speech is not freedom for those who agree either with the government, or with you.

The activists have been released on police bail.

On the surface of it, the first bail condition is ludicrous to impose on avowed Marxists, but this appears to be another manifestation of the desire to criminalise any attempt to refer to Nazi genocide in association with the Gaza genocide. The restriction on distributing leaflets at protests is straight from the handbook of a totalitarian state.

[…]

Via https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/11/28/banned-books-arrests-and-police-supression-in-the-uk/

Dr Eddy Betterman

Internal reports from drug giant Moderna show that all throughout the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “pandemic,” the company conspired and colluded with law enforcement and social media companies to target vaccine skeptics like Serbian tennis champion Novak Djokovic.

Moderna actually compiled one report devoted specifically to Djokovic, who is popular, well-loved and very outspoken in opposition to vaccines. Entitled “Djokovic Crowned Anti-vaccine Hero after U.S. Open Win,” the report cites how Djokovic was barred from competing in the 2022 U.S. Open due to being unvaccinated, but that he returned this past year and won.

This is significant because the U.S. Open is sponsored by Moderna, which is clearly very threatened by Djokovic speaking his mind. The company wrote in its report on Djokovic that:

“The optics of Djokovic, whose vaccine opposition barred him from competing in the 2022 U.S. Open, returning to and winning the Moderna-sponsored competition bolsters anti-vaccine claims that vaccines – and mandates – are unnecessary.”

Djokovic is rated by Moderna as “high-risk” in the company’s internal classification system because of his popular status and influence. Many of Djokovic’s fanatics, Moderna also found, are vocal on social media in that they “mockingly point out that Moderna is a U.S. Open sponsor.”

(Related: Djokovic was kicked out of Australia during COVID for being unvaccinated.)

Big Pharma-funded Public Good Projects funds vaccine hesitancy snitch network

It turns out that Moderna is not compiling these reports all by itself. The company has a hidden marketing partnership with former law enforcement officials, including at the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). These former spooks also utilize the help of corrupt public health officials to both monitor and influence vaccine policy.

This is made possible through a drug industry-funded non-governmental organization (NGO) called Public Good Projects (PGP) that works closely with social media companies, government agencies, and news websites to directly confront the “root cause of vaccine hesitancy” by rapidly pinpointing and “shutting down misinformation.”

At no point in any of its reports does Moderna actually specify how its targets are spreading misinformation, nor does it state any kind of counter truth as a rebuttal. It is simply stated over and over again in these reports that the targets are wrong and spreading misinformation – no evidence required.

“According to documents we have seen, PGP works closely with social media platforms, government agencies and news websites to confront the ‘root cause of vaccine hesitancy’ by rapidly identifying and “shutting down misinformation,’” write Lee Fang and Jack Poulson for UnHerd.

“A network of 45,000 healthcare professionals [is] given talking points ‘and advice on how to respond when vaccine misinformation goes mainstream,’ according to an email from Moderna.”

Moderna utilizes an AI called “Blue Silk” to monitor vaccine-related conversations online

Since the beginning of the so-called “pandemic,” Moderna has played a crucial role in fueling the public discourse wars surrounding its mRNA COVID jabs, which are the company’s first real product that has gone to market. Moderna also helped engineer more public support for lockdowns and mass vaccination by manipulating the government narrative to what it ultimately became.

“With PGP, Moderna is monitoring a huge range of mainstream outlets, as well as unconventional ones, such as the Steam online gaming community and Medium,” UnHerd further explains.

“Meanwhile, Moderna also retains Talkwalker which uses its ‘Blue Silk’ artificial intelligence to monitor vaccine-related conversations across 150 million websites in nearly 200 countries. Discussions around ‘competitor’ issues, including discussions of Pfizer are flagged as well as vaccine hesitancy.”

One former law enforcement agent who partners with Moderna to push its agenda is Nikki Rutman. Rutman spent nearly 20 years as an analyst at the FBI, during which time she helped spearhead the Trump regime’s “Operation Warp Speed” program to mass jab the entire country in record time.

We are told that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), created by the George W. Bush regime after 9/11, is also colluding with Moderna along with the others to steer the public conversation in support of vaccines.

In another unearthed Moderna report, we read that DHS along with former FBI and other law enforcement agencies have a color-coded warning system in place that gauges the severity of anti-vaccine narratives.

“The high and medium alerts include explanations of the news source and why it matters, followed by a listing of “’ow-risk narratives we are monitoring’ that ‘don’t currently warrant any action,’” UnHerd reports. “If and when a response is needed, ‘our team will notify the appropriate stakeholders with recommendations.’”

One big name on that list in the “high risk” category is billionaire electric vehicle (EV) guru Elon Musk, who now owns X (formerly Twitter). Moderna says that Musk is really dangerous because he created a video ridiculing the media and government officials for claiming that COVID jabs are “100 percent effective” against the bioweapon.

Like its other reports, Moderna’s report on Musk does not specify any allegedly false statements that he made in the video. Instead, it simply labeled the video as dangerous for pointing out that allowing “deception by health authorities and health care providers during the pandemic” will “lay the groundwork to sow distrust in credible sources on vaccine safety and effectiveness.”

Russell Brand is also named in a Moderna report as a dangerous anti-vaxxer because of his outspoken “anti-vaccine beliefs.” One popular video that featured Brand highlighted how, at the peak of Operation Warp Speed, Moderna and Pfizer were both raking in “$1,000 of profit every second” from the sale of their COVID injections.

[…]

Via https://dreddymd.com/2023/11/29/moderna-marketing-colludes-law-enforcement-spying-discourse-vaccines/

The Eclectic Radical

Internationalist 360°

A meme on Twitter has been asking “Where do the Israeli Jews go?” as if this is the supreme gotcha and this question completely invalidates all discussion of Palestinian liberation, as if Palestinian self-determination automatically means rendering the entire population of Israel homeless and stateless. This ignores the fact that the mere creation of Israel resulted in 750,000 to 1,000,000 Palestinians becoming homeless refugees. This also ignores the fact that, unless they have been naturalized as citizens in another country or are recognized as citizens of Israel, all Palestinians are stateless and have been for generations. The idea that justice for Palestinians automatically results in massive injustice for Israelis ignores that fact that restorative justice is in fact, not injustice at all. People whose homes were actually stolen when they were terrorized into abandoning them deserve their homes back.

The ethical gotcha behind “Where do the Israeli Jews go?” is that it would be unjust to put Israeli settlers in the same circumstances in which the Palestinians find themselves. This renders the vast injustice done to the Palestinians as a fait accompli that cannot be undone because it would cause even more harm. This would automatically eliminate the two state solution that American idealists and Israeli moderates have somewhat unrealistically clung to despite the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin and the unwillingness of any Israeli prime minsters who succeeded Rabin to risk the same fate. US President Joe Biden has been brandishing a two state solution as the ultimate and necessary solution to the “war” between the settlers and the Palestinians. Unfortunately for Joe Biden, if it is ethically beyond the pale to displace Israelis in the name of Palestinian liberation then any Palestinian state formed will be hopelessly undermined by hostile communities of settlers who will still see themselves as Israelis and reject Palestinian sovereignty over their communities.

Let me repeat, as I said above, restorative justice is not injustice. This is not a question of generational guilt or punishing people today for crimes committed generations ago. The crime is still being committed. The crime is ongoing. The children of the thieves are not only living in stolen homes, but declaring their right to those homes and supporting the displacement or killing of more Palestinians so that more settlers can have homes. Former Prime Minister of Israel Naftali Bennett is the son of Americans from San Francisco who settled in Haifa after the Six Day War. It is not a coincidence that he advocates strongly for military expansionism. He was raised on a narrative of conquest and Israeli triumphalism. Well before the Nakba, Haifa was the scene of intense settlement by the Jewish Agency. A city that had 20,000 residents (of whom 6,000 were Jewish) in 1922 had a population of over 97,000 in 1948 ,and that larger population was 96% Jewish. The replacement of the Palestinian population with settlers didn’t start during the Nakba. Ethnic cleansing is much older.

When this historical context is correctly understood then the following becomes clear: the two state solution requires an understanding that the Palestinians will not seek restorative justice past a certain point. The scope of justice allowed must be set by the party that did the harm and must commit to making restoration for justice to be possible. This is a dangerous situation that requires a maintained relationship of settler dominance and Palestinian acquiescence. If Palestinians do not acquiesce then their refusal to acquiesce puts us back in the same circumstances in which we began. The settler movement would have us believe that this is something for which the Palestinians, and not the settlers, are to blame. This is objectively false in the context of Palestinian history. The Palestinians are defending themselves from ethnic cleansing. Only sustained self-defense has prevented ethnic cleansing and population replacement at a faster rate.

There is, of course, another obstacle to the practicality of a two-state solution separate from the question of its justice. This is the Israelis themselves.

The alleged centrist who succeeded Naftali Bennett as Prime Minister as part of a bizarre power sharing agreement between the Israeli far right and the so-called “moderates” called for a two-state solution at the United Nations. To Yair Lapid, a two-state solution depends on a “peaceful Palestinian state that does not threaten Israel.”  This has generally been interpreted in policy terms by the so-called Middle East experts as a “demilitarized Palestinian state.”  This means that the proposed two-state  solution proposed by many experts is one that is unacceptable to Palestinians because they would still have the IDF as a neighbor and a significant population of settlers, with no means to defend themselves. How is this fundamentally different than the existing occupation of the West Bank and containment of Gaza? Yet the Israeli state has the power to set the terms of the existence of the Palestinian state and the Palestinian people are supposed to accept this as established fact. If they do not, it is their fault.

Once more, with feeling: restorative justice is not injustice.

A real two-state solution, with a Palestine equipped to defend itself, is a surrender to the settler fait accompli in the first place. It requires an act of acquiescence to happen. If the Palestinians are unwilling to acquiesce to only partial justice then it is impossible. These are objective facts. When the settler movement is so powerful that the Israeli state cannot even propose a true two-state solution, but must instead add impossible demands that only make Palestinian acceptance less likely then we must accept that the Israeli state is not serious about a two-state solution. A serious effort would involve every possible concession that would make acquiescence more acceptable to the Palestinians. The Israeli state has never engaged in such a peace process.

This brings us to the question I ask in the headline. What does a just peace look like?

It also brings us to the question of the meme and the settler movement. Where do the Israeli Jews go?

Only the Palestinians can answer the first question. I am a white American, which makes me a settler myself. I can’t tell Palestinians what a just peace in Palestine looks like anymore than I can tell the Modoc what a just peace with the US government would really look like. That’s why I support the land back movement and believe that the United States should be legally forced to honor its treaties with Indigenous nations. We should reject the arrogance that might lead us to suggest or force a solution to the question of Palestinian liberation. We should instead support the Palestinians in their struggle against the settler movement. Only the Palestinians can determine what a just peace would look like and what they are willing to acquiesce to short of “from the river to the sea.” If they’re not, only they can make that decision. We should still support them.

Once again, restorative justice is not injustice.

The settler movement’s question remains. Where do the Israeli Jews go?

Only the Israeli Jews can answer that question, and their answer has no authority to determine whether or not the Palestinians should acquiesce to anything less than their full liberation. Most white Rhodesians chose to go to the UK, Australia, South Africa or Latin America when the Bush War ended and Rhodesia became Zimbabwe. Most white Kenyans stayed in Kenya after Kenyan independence, at one point the Black Kenyan government made white man Richard Leakey the cabinet secretary and head of the civil service. Most white South Africans remained in South Africa after the legal end of apartheid and the institution of formal legal equality and liberal democracy within the South African state. Far too many Israelis will choose to fight for the Israeli state, at least in the near future. What they do when the Palestinian struggle is won is up to them. If they commit crimes against the Palestinians that make them unwelcome, whose responsibility is that?

[…]

Via https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/11/28/what-would-a-just-peace-in-palestine-look-like/