The Most Revolutionary Act

Uncensored updates on world events, economics, the environment and medicine

The Most Revolutionary Act

Author Archives: stuartbramhall

Unknown's avatar

About stuartbramhall

Retired child and adolescent psychiatrist and American expatriate in New Zealand. In 2002, I made the difficult decision to close my 25-year Seattle practice after 15 years of covert FBI harassment. I describe the unrelenting phone harassment, illegal break-ins and six attempts on my life in my 2010 book The Most Revolutionary Act: Memoir of an American Refugee.

Disaster Capitalists Ready to Descend on Ukraine

Posted on by
7

A close-up of a building Description automatically generated[Source: globalresearch.ca]

Jeremy Kuzmarov

Ukrainian Reconstruction Bank Set Up by BlackRock and JPMorgan Chase Has Secured at Least $500 Million in Capital

A key purpose underlying the Ukraine War was made clear at the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos in January when Philipp Hildebrand, vice chairman of BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, announced the start of a much-touted Ukrainian Reconstruction Bank in five to six months.

The Reconstruction Bank is being put together by BlackRock and JPMorgan Chase for the Ukrainian government.

Many of its initiatives will be overseen by Penny Pritzker, a banking heiress from a family with CIA and Mafia connections and a history of white-collar crime,[1] who was appointed by the Biden administration as a special envoy for Ukrainian reconstruction.

The Reconstruction Bank has secured $500 million in pledges by foreign investors seeking to profit off of Ukraine’s reconstruction with the expectation that another $500 million will be secured in the next six months.

One of the potential investors is Robert Kraft, the billionaire paper manufacturer and owner of the New England Patriots, who has been part of JPMorgan-led discussions on rebuilding Ukraine for the past year, and is now seriously considering building paper manufacturing factories in western Ukraine.[2]

The reconstruction of Ukraine is necessitated by a war manufactured by the U.S., which turned the Ukrainians against the Russians in order to draw Russia into a devastating conflict that held the prospects of weakening Russia and enriching U.S. corporations.

The elimination of a generation of Ukrainian and Russian youth and devastation of Ukrainian cities was “collateral damage” whose only utility lay in its propaganda value as the Russians have been blamed for all the carnage.

At the World Economic Forum, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky met JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon and other senior JPMorgan executives, BlackRock’s top management, executives from Bridgewater Associates, Carlyle Group, a leading weapons contractor, Blackstone, Dell and ArcelorMittal, which all seek to grow rich in Ukraine.

Last January, Zelensky gave a speech before the Boca Raton Chamber of Commerce in which he boasted that BlackRock, JPMorgan, and Goldman Sachs “have already become part of our Ukrainian way.”[3]

When Dimon and other JPMorgan executives visited Kyiv in February 2023, they agreed that JPMorgan would not only help to raise private investment funds for Ukraine, but would also advise Ukraine on financial stabilization, sovereign credit ratings, and economic ties to Europe.

Dimon said the “full resources” of JPMorgan would be available to Ukraine as it “charts its post-conflict path to growth.” Earlier, Dimon had called Ukraine “an inflection point for the Western World for one hundred years.”

Such views correlated with Dimon’s self-interest; on top of the lure of reconstruction contracts funded by the Reconstruction Bank, JPMorgan held more than $2.5 billion in Raytheon stock, and over $1.3 billion worth of both Northrop Grumman and General Dynamics stock as of February 15, 2023, major weapons contractors that have made huge profits from the war with Russia.

Fittingly, during his visit to Kyiv, Dimon and other JPMorgan executives gifted Zelensky with a New England Patriots jersey with the number 91 on it for the year Ukraine gained its independence after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Besides opening the floodgates to foreign capital, Ukraine continues to be valued by Dimon and his associates as a battering ram whose purpose is to weaken Russia and affect regime change so a new leader can allow Wall Street to penetrate Russia’s economy and gain ownership of its rich natural resources, as it was beginning to do under Boris Yeltsin, Vladimir Putin’s predecessor.

Disaster Capitalism

Ukraine would provide another good chapter in Naomi Klein’s book, The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, published in 2007, which showed how capitalist interests have deliberately manufactured crisis after crisis so that they could profit from the wreckage.

A key case study of the book is Iraq, where Klein shows how military contractors and oil companies that profited from the Bush administration’s shock-and-awe campaign sought to capitalize on the privatization bonanza and opening of the country to Western corporations under the direction of L. Paul Bremer, the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) economic czar.

Klein reported that Bremer, a former managing director at Kissinger Associates, enacted a “radical set of laws described by The Economist in glowing terms as the ‘wish-list’ that foreign investors and donor agencies dream of for developing markets.”[4] Iraq, however, was transformed under Bremer into a dystopia where the country relinquished its economic sovereignty.

Ukraine appears on the threshold of suffering the same fate.

Zelensky has already helped to establish a low-wage, low-tax economy conducive to foreign investors, while dismantling progressive labor laws, supporting land privatization and initiating attacks on unions and left-wing politicians and political parties, which have been banned.

Founder and chairman of a private investment firm, PSP Partners, and past member of the Board of Directors of the Council on Foreign Relations, Wall Street’s think tank, Penny Pritzker visited Kyiv during her tenure as Commerce Secretary following the February 2014 Maidan coup and helped deliver a $3 billion loan that was contingent on the government adopting neo-liberal reforms beneficial to foreign corporations that had been resisted by Viktor Yanukovych, the pro-Russian leader ousted in the coup.

As a result of the “reforms” championed by Pritzker, U.S. corporations such as Cargill, DuPont (a Delaware-based company which has long supported Joe Biden’s political career) and Monsanto have been able to invest heavily in Ukrainian agriculture and, according to a report in the Australian National Review, purchased more than 17 million hectares of Ukraine’s arable land—more than all the arable land that exists in Italy.

The main shareholders in these latter companies are Wall Street investment firms—The Vanguard Group, BlackRock and Blackstone—which donate heavily to both the Democratic and Republican parties and own major weapons companies like Raytheon, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, General Dynamics and Lockheed Martin that have done brisk business contributing to the destruction of Ukraine.

An April 2021 report by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) made the lifting of a moratorium on the sale of land to foreign companies a condition for the loan package that Pritzker helped to deliver.

A poll found that 81% of Ukrainians were against the sale of land to foreigners and lifting of the moratorium, while only 13% were in favor of it.

Geopolitical analyst Drago Bosnic wrote that “the Ukrainian people have not only been quite literally robbed of the lands their ancestors gave their lives for”; they are also “effectively dying in battle to make sure this theft continues unabated.”

At the World Economic Forum, Pritzker spoke about the interest of promising investors, who are ready for higher risk, which she said will have to be mitigated by donor countries (i.e., taxpayers), before wealth from pension funds managed by BlackRock can be mobilized.

About 280 projects have applied to the fund so far, with around 30 projects being considered by BlackRock and JPMorgan Chase.

Rostyslav Shurma, deputy head of Zelensky’s office, expects $1 billion commitments in “catalytic capital.” This term refers to capital-like investments, debt and guarantees in which the investor accepts higher risk for greater social impact, according to Reuters.

The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), of which the U.S. is the largest shareholder, wants to further “massively engage” in Ukraine.

Based in London, the EBRD was founded in 1991, to intervene with credit and projects to help former Soviet areas to “adjust” to Western ways after the Soviet Union dissolved.

For example, the EBRD worked overtime in Ukraine in the 1990s, to aid the global agricultural cartels to gain dominance in the country.

The EBRD plans to provide €7.5-15 billion in announced investments in the next five years, with special emphasis on “support for the private sector.”

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is “optimistic” that all 27 EU member states will agree to joint financial assistance for Ukraine—in 2024-2027 some €50 billion altogether.

The EBRD’s important role in the new Ukraine underscores the function of Western government institutions in facilitating shameless corporate war profiteering.

How much longer Ukrainians will put up with Zelensky’s brazen fealty to Western corporate interests is an open question, as signs of disaffection in the country continue to grow.

Ukrainians at this time would do well to read the chapter in Klein’s book about Iraq and mobilize to prevent the same thing from happening to them, even if it is already far along.

[…]

Via https://covertactionmagazine.com/2024/01/31/disaster-capitalists-ready-to-descend-on-ukraine/

RFK Jr slams American attacks on Syria and Iraq

Posted on by
14
RFK Jr slams American attacks on Syria and Iraq
 ©  Rebecca Noble / GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA / Getty Images via AFP

 

RT

The US presidential candidate urged Washington to get “unwelcome” troops out of the Middle East

The US should withdraw its ground troops from Middle Eastern countries that do not welcome them, independent candidate for US president Robert F. Kennedy Jr has said.

He said the escalation could have been avoided, reacting in an X (formerly Twitter) post to Washington’s attack on more than 80 targets allegedly linked to Iran’s Revolutionary Guard (IRGC) in Iraq and Syria in a wide-ranging air assault.

US Central Command says it hit 85 Iranian-linked targets in Syria and Iraq in retaliation against the recent “Iran-affiliated” fighters’ attack that killed three US servicemen in Jordan. President Joe Biden’s X post read that the US does not “seek conflict in the Middle East or anywhere else in the world. But to all those who seek to do us harm: We will respond,” despite Iran denying involvement in the incident.

“If we ‘do not seek conflict,’ then let’s get the troops out of there,” Kennedy said, apparently reacting to Biden’s statement. “They are not welcome. They are not needed,” he added.

Kennedy claimed that the current escalation would not have been necessary if Washington hadn’t put its military “in the crosshairs” of Shiite militias. He described the existence of these groups “as a legacy of our illegal war in Iraq.” He recalled that both Iraq and Syria had asked the US troops to leave their territory while Iran would not tolerate America’s military presence on its borders.

Besides pulling US troops “out of the Mideast,” Kennedy urged Washington to forge ties with regional powers instead. The presidential candidate also described the troop presence in the area as “indefensible targets for anyone in the region who wants to provoke a conflict.”

Iraq has rebuked the US over the airstrikes, saying they constitute “a violation of Iraqi sovereignty” and “pose a threat that could lead Iraq and the region into dire consequences. The Syrian military, as quoted by SANA news agency, denounced the raid as “the aggression of the American occupation forces.”

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/591769-kennedy-slams-usa-strikes-iraq-syria/

The Weaponization of Finance: Mike Adams Interviews Dr Mercola About Chase Debanking

Posted on by
Reply

Story at-a-glance

  • Debanking is the weaponization of finance for the purpose of social control, which simply doesn’t happen in a free society
  • By debanking me, my CEO, CFO, their spouses and children, Chase Bank is giving people a foretaste of how central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) will be used to control the masses
  • In the U.S., 81.37% of all desktop searches are done on Google. Worldwide, its market share for search is 85.53%. Its monopoly on searches gives Google enormous influence over what people can see and learn about, which is incredibly dangerous. Google, all by itself, can easily mislead and “de-educate” the global population for generations to come
  • AI systems are also being programmed with pro-pharma propaganda, and that will become the dominant knowledge base for humanity from here on
  • To preserve life-saving health information that is being actively censored to erase it from human memory, I am creating a master video course that will encapsulate my life’s work. Once completed, the course will be available to Substack subscribers, who can download the videos and share them with others

August 18, 2023, I joined Mike Adams, aka, “The Health Ranger,” on his free-speech platform, Brighteon, to discuss our debanking by JP Morgan Chase Bank.

As previously reported, in mid-July, I, along with my CEO and CFO — both of whom have been with me for nearly 20 years — received identical letters informing us that Chase Bank was closing our accounts, as well as the accounts of their spouses and children.

Irrational Excuses

In the original letters, the only reason we were given was that there was “unexpected activity” on an unspecified account. Later, a representative told reporters that account closures are typically only done for anti-money laundering purposes.1,2

However, no money laundering charges have ever leveled against me, and in a real money laundering case, they seize your accounts outright. They don’t give you a month to take your business elsewhere.

Then, in response to a letter by Florida Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis, in which he questioned the bank’s decision to close our accounts, a Chase spokesman replied that the accounts were closed because:3

“… the customer has been the subject of regulatory scrutiny by the Federal government on multiple occasions for engaging in illegal activity relating to the marketing and sale of consumer products and we have a legal obligation to prevent funds derived from these activities from flowing through our bank.”

The last “federal scrutiny” of our business was 2.5 years ago in 2021,4 when the Food and Drug Administration sent us a warning letter accusing us of selling vitamins C, D, quercetin and Pterostilbene Advanced to “mitigate, prevent, treat, diagnose or cure COVID-19 in people,” in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

However, a warning letter is not proof of illegal activity. It’s an accusation. We responded to the FDA’s letter, letting them know their accusations were baseless, and that was the end of that. We had not violated the law.

If Chase insists it has a “legal obligation” to debank me, my employees and their families, over an old FDA warning letter — which had no legal basis and never led to criminal charges — then Chase Bank would also be legally obligated to debank its own executives and employees who intentionally benefited from sex trafficking5,6,7 and defrauded investors with illegal investment schemes.8 Why haven’t they?

Hidden Social Credit System in Action

While many have been debanked over the past couple of years, what’s particularly egregious about this action is that it was not only directed at me, but my employees and their families as well.

[…]

It’s the weaponization of finance for the purpose of social control, which simply doesn’t happen in a free society.

In that respect, the actions by Chase Bank indicate we’re in a whole new phase of the globalists’ social engineering project. It’s also a foretaste of how the central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) will be used to control the masses.

Chase Bank Is Part of Government Censorship Committee

Interestingly, we recently discovered that Chase Bank is the only bank represented on the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency’s (CISA) Cybersecurity Advisory Committee,9 which may explain why Chase targeted my business. This advisory committee provides “strategic and actionable recommendations” to the CISA director on “cybersecurity issues.”

A Chase representative was present during a March 1, 2022, Cybersecurity Advisory Committee Protecting Critical Infrastructure from Misinformation & Disinformation Subcommittee meeting,10,11 in which Laura Dehmlow, section chief for the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF), warned that “subversive information” on social media could undermine public support for the U.S. government, and that “media infrastructure” needed to be held accountable.

The committee members went on to discuss what the government’s strategic approach related to misinformation and disinformation ought to be, how best to organize information sharing between the public and private sector, and how to collaborate across channels.

We now know that a formalized process was implemented that allowed government officials to log into a special portal where they could flag social media content for removal.12

Ask yourself, why was a major bank included in a meeting in which they were trying to tease out the best way for government to censor Americans? With everything we now know about CISA’s domestic censorship activities, it seems reasonable to suspect that the weaponization of finance — debanking “domestic threat actors” — was part of the original strategy.

So, did CISA have a hand in the bank’s decision to close my business accounts, and those of key employees and their families? We have no evidence of this yet, but it wouldn’t surprise me.

Florida Attorney General Is on the Case

In May 2023, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed legislation that specifically prohibits financial institutions from denying or canceling services based on political or religious beliefs,13 so, we may end up being the test case for this new legislation. We’re currently working with the Florida state attorney general.

Unfortunately, I misspoke during the interview, saying the attorney general’s office is filing a suit against Chase. However, we’re not quite there yet. I’ve been told it’s still too early to tell whether charges will be filed.

The Second Burning of the Library of Alexandria

I launched my website in 1997. Google didn’t even exist yet. And for years, all the way up to about 2015 or so, the internet remained uncensored. You could find information about anything you could think of.

What’s happening to the internet now is reminiscent of the burning of the library of Alexandria, the storehouse of the world’s most important and precious information. For background, the library of ancient Alexandria in Egypt, was once known as the “greatest accumulation of human knowledge in history.”14 Historical sources report there may have been as many as 400,000 papyrus scrolls recording ancient works and knowledge, including 200,000 that Marc Antony gave to Cleopatra.

Inexplicably, like their 21st century cousins, the world citizens of yesterday apparently didn’t appreciate this wide body of knowledge and, over the centuries they burned the library numerous times until, today, practically none of the library still exists, after a purging reportedly done to erase anything that disagreed with The Koran occurred.

Now, the modern world’s library, Google, has essentially burned itself down by programming its search algorithms such that you cannot find anything but officially sanctioned information, unless you know the URL of what you’re looking for. If you rely on any search engines your search results will typically be limited to less than 100 links you can click on even though there may be tens or hundreds of millions of results.

In the U.S., 81.37% of all desktop searches are done on Google.15 Worldwide, its market share for search is 85.53%.16 Its monopoly on searches gives Google enormous influence over what people can see and learn about, which is incredibly dangerous. Google, all by itself, can easily mislead and “de-educate” the global population for generations to come.

However, since nearly every search engine uses Google data, the indirect control they have is likely closer to 95%.

Eventually, I suspect artificial intelligence will take over online searches, at which point there will only be one answer for any given question. Needless to say, that will be even more dangerous. We can already see that AI systems are being fed a steady diet of pro-pharma propaganda and nothing else, and that will become the dominant knowledge base for humanity from here on.

So, we’re at a point now where we must work to preserve life-saving information, and figure out a way to distribute it in a way that cannot be censored. Fortunately, decentralized alternatives are coming online, such as Qortal,17 Bastyon18 and Nostr.19 Adams is also working on turning Brighteon into a completely decentralized, peer-to-peer platform that will be impossible to censor or shut down.

[…]

Prepare for the Inevitable

I’m convinced COVID-19 was just a test run. Something far worse than COVID is being planned for us, so we must prepare, to the best of our ability. Addressing any health problems you may have and maintaining good health is part of that preparation. Being healthy will make you more resilient in the face of just about any difficulty, and there’s no telling what the globalist cabal will cook up next.

It could be another bioweapon, electrical grid failures, food shortages, a financial collapse, a cyberattack on critical infrastructure or a fabricated alien invasion.

Critical data collection on messaging and public responses took place during the COVID pandemic, so now they have the technological capability to identify the triggers that will maximize fear and give them the greatest degree of control. I suspect the next crisis will be far worse for that fact alone.

Whatever crisis gets rolled out, we now know that it will be used to push tyranny, because global slavery is the ultimate goal. They want complete control over every human being on earth, from cradle to grave — what you eat, what you do and think, what you buy, how and where you live, and for how long.

Another crucial preparation strategy is to build a community where you can share knowledge. Everyone has different skill sets, and we need to learn to work together locally and help each other.

Lone wolves are not likely to survive the multitude of crises headed our way. City dwellers will also face much greater difficulty, as there are so few natural resources there. So, if you can, get out of the cities.

[…]

Via https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2024/02/04/mike-adams-mercola-chase-debanking-interview.aspx

Austria and Prussia Declare War on French Revolution

Posted on by
1

Episode 19: The Path to War with Europe

Living the French Revolution and Age of Napoleon

Dr Suzanne M Desan

Film Review

In October 1791, France became a constitutional monarchy, with the Legislative Assembly (with 745 new deputies) replacing the National Assembly. Of the new deputies one quarter were left wing Jacobins* who wanted a republic, one quarter wanted a constitutional monarchy and half were unaffiliated.

Aware that (former enemies) Prussia and Austria were conspiring with Louis XVI to overthrow the revolution, in late 1791 some deputies called for a preemptive strike against Austria.  Other deputies (including the Jacobins) opposed war because they feared it would increase the king’s power and possibly lead to dictatorship.

In March 1792, the Austrian monarch (and Holy Roman Emperor) Leopold II died suddenly, to be replaced by Marie Antoinette’s nephew Francis II. She wrote asking him to declare war on France, asserting (falsely) that the French communes were about to put the king and herself on trial.

On 12 April, Lafayette, leader of the national guard, ordered 50,000 reinforcements to the border with the Austrian Netherlands (modern day Belgium), and Louis XVI replaced his more moderate ministers with pro-war officials. On April 20, the king declared war against Austria, Bohemia and Hungary (the constitution gave him that power) and only seven deputies voted no. France would be continuously at war for the next 23 years.

Prussia, in turn, declared war on France.

*The Jacobins were so named because in Paris they met in a a former convent of the Dominicans, who also known Jacobins. Their official name was the Society of the Friends of the Constitution.

Film can be viewed with a library card on Kanopy.

https://www.kanopy.com/en/pukeariki/watch/video/149323/149357

ADL defines genocide and civil disobedience within the FBI

Posted on by
6

By Grant F. Smith | IRmep | February 2, 2024 

The looming threat to Middle East peace activism

As politicians and the Anti-Defamation League call for crackdowns on Middle East peace protesters, the ADL’s undue influence within the FBI as a trainer is finally exposed.

Basic Field Training Course

The Department of Justice released the Anti-Defamation League’s Basic Field Training Course (PDF). The course is mandatory for all FBI New Agent Trainees (NATs) and New Intelligence Analyst Trainees (NIATs). This release follows a decade of Freedom of Information Act requests and denials by the Department of Justice (PDF) and evasion by publicly funded content contributors.

The ADL course is developed and conducted by Anti-Defamation League (ADL) instructors. It selects materials from the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM) and Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial. Marcus Appelbaum, Museum Director of Law, Justice and Society Initiatives in 2014 resisted any public review of the curriculum, stating, “Unfortunately we do not randomly send out the curriculum.” Appelbaum also denied that any of the large amounts of U.S. taxpayer funding supporting the museum paid for the curriculum.

[…]

Museum Director of Law, Justice and Society Initiatives Marcus Appelbaum denied curriculum release in 2014.

The ADL course facilitates a discussion of the USHMM video The Path to Nazi Genocide by asking trainees to watch and then consider “the challenges that police officers faced, and decisions they made in Germany during the Nazi era.” The video depicts the rise of Nazi Germany from WWI to the final WWII liberation of concentration camps replete with emaciated images of the dead and barely living.

The final question the video puts to agents in training is why the word “genocide” had to be coined in the aftermath. “As the world struggled to understand what had happened, a new word, genocide, was needed for these crimes — crimes committed by ordinary people from a society not unlike our own.”

The ADL training also requires viewing the civil rights documentary Eyes on the Prize: No Easy Walk. Supplemental reading exposes new FBI agents to the bureau’s past role undermining Martin Luther King Jr. and documents Bull Connor’s relentless fire hosing and mass arrests of black protesters engaged in civil disobedience. The video ends with the triumphant 1963 March on Washington and JFK’s proposal for a Civil Rights Act.

Taken in context, the entirety of the Basic Field Training Course makes it clear that FBI trainees are ADL subordinates who must strive to meet with its approval. Page 9 of the guide even states, “as a new hire, we would like you….”

The unstated purpose of the course is positioning Israeli activities in the US and the ADL itself outside the purview of law enforcement and especially FBI counterintelligence. The ADL today is framed as trusted trainers and civil rights partners. That was not always the case. The ADL’s current privileged insider role training all new FBI special agents is the result of a secretive influence campaign that began more than eight decades ago. Internal FBI files about that campaign reveal the ADL’s true reasons for infiltrating the FBI.

In 1940 the ADL launched an intense effort to liaise with the FBI by offering a list of undercover ADL investigators to FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover. The FBI was reluctant to accept the ADL list. One FBI special agent told Hoover he found a proposed investigator resource to be “mentally unbalanced.” Others offered up by ADL, such as longtime political campaign donation bundler Abraham Feinberg, was known to the FBI as a WWII surplus conventional weapons smuggler for Israel and alleged unregistered foreign agent. Feinberg later financed Israel’s clandestine nuclear weapons program.

The ADL offered to investigate persons of interest to the FBI. FBI Assistant Director P. E. Foxworth nixed that idea, telling Hoover the ADL was engaged in “shakedowns” of “loyal and innocent” Americans and “interested only in their own material benefit…”

This did not keep the ADL from announcing in 1942 it had conducted “373 investigations” on behalf of the FBI. This prompted Hoover to respond that private investigative agencies had “no excuse for existence” and that the FBI “had never asked the ADL to conduct an investigation.” On June 30, 1943, Luigi S. Crisculo, an American investment banker involved in Italian American causes, reported being baited by Anti-Defamation League operatives who claimed to be “unofficial auxiliaries of the Department of Justice” and were attempting to link him to Nazism.

The ADL also wanted to directly seed its operatives into the FBI. Arnold Forster (AKA Fastenberg) began developing ADL’s legal team in 1938 while simultaneously applying to become an FBI special agent in 1937 and 1939. Forster was formally rejected because in the view of the FBI he “dressed poorly, did not appear resourceful and would probably not develop.” Forster then became ADL’s chief investigator in 1940 and held formal and informal positions until 2003. Another longtime ADL investigator and operative named Frank Prince even campaigned to replace Hoover as FBI director. When caught out in 1942, the ADL offered to “disband within 24 hours.” The FBI did not take the ADL up on this offer since “we [the FBI] are not running the Anti-Defamation League.”

Throughout the 1940s the ADL continuously lobbied FBI field offices for meetings and joint events which befuddled some bureau insiders. One special agent in command reported to Hoover he could not “understand the insistence of the ADL that a representative of this Bureau address this group.” He felt, “there is some ulterior motive that causes them to be so insistent.”

One ADL motive was gaining privileged access to FBI files. In 1944 ADL’s Nissan Gross asked to periodically check FBI files to avoid “duplication of investigation.” Special Agent in Command Drayton rebuffed the ADL because “under the procedure…ADL would have an opportunity to learn of the informants being utilized…and those under investigation.”

In 1968 FBI Director J Edgar Hoover finally dropped his longstanding opposition and ordered field offices “to immediately make certain that you have established liaison with the head of the ADL regional office in your territory…” Such liaisons continue to this day. Since then, joint public events, training sessions and even FBI director “love letters” to the ADL have been ongoing.

Given its insider status at the FBI, growing piles of Palestinian corpses in Gaza and resultant mass protests and civil disobedience in the U.S. may not be a challenge for the ADL which, along with other nodes of the Israel affinity ecosystem, works to censor open debate and protests of concern to Israel. As an FBI trainer, the ADL has finally transcended scrutiny. The FBI previously, acting on credible evidence, investigated ADL for domestic spying before political pressure on former Attorney General Janet Reno quashed the investigation. Such investigations of the ADL today would be unthinkable.

Even before the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks on Israel and Israel’s attack on Gaza and settler rampages in the West Bank, the ADL was seeding the FBI with false threat reports conflating peaceful US based Palestinian rights groups with white nationalist movements.

ADL statistics and reports also attempt to reframe pro-Palestinian protests and civil disobedience in the United States as Antisemitism and “hate crimes” rather than anything resembling legitimate Civil Rights era nonviolent action. Under its forced “liaison” with the ADL, the FBI must pay close attention to and respond to all the ADL’s false and misleading allegations lest other nodes of the Israel affinity ecosystem work in concert to threaten its funding, political appointees or mundane issues such as a new headquarters.

The ADL and Israel lobby ecosystem acted quickly to compel Congressional “genocide threat” hearings—focused not on the reality of tens of thousands of dead in Gaza, but rather the discomfort felt by American Zionist students at elite Ivy league universities encountering campus cease fire rallies.

Following the ADL worldview, former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi recently alleged that pro-Palestinian protesters picketing her home were acting on behalf of Russia and China and demanded that the FBI investigate them as foreign agents.

It is ironic that Pelosi, who has benefited all her career from support from AIPAC, an Israeli foreign influence operation set up with $60 million in foreign funds laundered into the US in the 1950s and 1960s, hurls foreign agent accusations at peaceful protesters.

[…]

However, the threat of looming FBI crackdowns, covert or overt, on protesters calling for Middle East peace should not be discounted given the ADL’s success infiltrating its worldview into the bureau. Although FBI Director Christopher Wray has promised the FBI will not investigate or surveil peaceful pro-Palestine protests, his promise leaves out entrapment operations. The pressure for the bureau to “get results” by seeding plots, weapons and entrap mentally unbalanced individuals in “Palestinian terror plots” may soon become overwhelming. Such “successes” would instantly gain uncritical, widespread mainstream media diffusion and touch off more congressional hearings for further operations and funds to Israel.

One certainty is that even as the International Court of Justice demands Israel refrain from violations of the Genocide Convention, the ADL will certainly not teach such relevant current day lessons to new generations of special agents.

[…]

Via https://alethonews.com/2024/02/02/adl-defines-genocide-and-civil-disobedience-within-the-fbi/

American Academy of Pediatrics calls breastfeeding “ethically problematic”

Posted on by
5
PLAIN STUPIDITY: Pharmaceutical front group American Academy of Pediatrics condemns natural breastfeeding, calling it “ethically problematic”

Dr Eddy Betterman

Is it bad for modern medicine to promote breastfeeding as the optimal way for a mother to feed her baby? According to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), a known pharmaceutical front group, the answer is yes.

In a recent announcement, the AAP criticized the leading medical and public health organizations for recommending that mothers exclusively breastfeed their babies for at least six months, this based on profuse evidence of breastmilk being the healthiest food for babies to grow and develop.

According to the AAP, a “spate of recent work challenges the extent of these benefits,” the suggestion being that there are other, perhaps better, ways to feed a baby without breastmilk.

The AAP insists that promoting breastfeeding is “stigmatizing,” its members claiming that they are “concerned about breastfeeding promotion that praises breastfeeding as the ‘natural’ way to feed infants.”

“This messaging plays into a powerful perspective that ‘natural’ approaches to health are better, a view examined in a recent report by the Nuffield Council on Bioethics,” the AAP says.

“Promoting breastfeeding as ‘natural’ may be ethically problematic, and, even more troublingly, it may bolster this belief that ‘natural’ approaches are presumptively healthier. This may ultimately challenge public health’s aims in other contexts, particularly childhood vaccination.”

Breastfeeding provides natural immunization for babies – no vaccines necessary

It is that last little bit about “childhood vaccination” that cuts to the heart of what the AAP is really concerned about underneath all that feigned moral outrage: mothers not getting their children vaccinated because the breastmilk is doing all the vaccinating naturally.

You see, once a critical mass of the population figures out that breastmilk and other living foods are the real preventions and cures for life’s ailments, Big Pharma will lose its cash cow – and we can’t have that if Wall Street expects to keep reaching all-time highs.

When a mother breastfeeds her child, she passes on her adaptive immune system to her babies. This is what you might call “nature’s pharmacy,” and for all intents and purposes it is free as opposed to the “medicine” dispensed by the pharmaceutical and vaccine industries, with the blessing of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

“All of the antibodies that the mother has accumulated through her life on Earth are gifted to her baby, to the obvious benefit of the child’s needy and developing immune system,” writes Ben Bartee for Armageddon Prose.

“Breastfeeding enhances the mother-child bond, the first and arguably most important social bond serves as the foundation for all others … Each of these effects of breastfeeding enhances the baby’s physical and psychological health and fosters a functional society. Conversely, neither enhances pharmaceutical profits or the social control of the state.”

Keep in mind that this is the same AAP that is pushing transgenderism on today’s youth with reckless abandon.

“Transhumanist ideology is hellbent on severing every physical and emotional tie that binds people – actual, biological, honest-to-God people – together and weaponizing human physiology for profit and social control,” Bartee further writes.

“The social engineers want us isolated, atomized, afraid, sick and sad. Ultimately, they want us dead. Anti-humanism is at the heart of their ethics.”

Commenters on Bartee’s story about the AAP’s insanity largely agree that “if ever there was proof of the anti-human agenda, this is it,” to quote one of them.

“The AAP doesn’t even bother to hide its goal, but segues straight to vaccine uptake and the promotion of all things technological and artificial. How anyone can read this and not have their eyes opened immediately is beyond me.”

[…]

Via https://dreddymd.com/2024/02/03/pharmaceutical-aap-condemns-breastfeeding-ethically-problematic/

New Legislation Supports Doling Out Money to CIA Drug Runners from Indochina War

Posted on by
1

A movie poster with a person and a plane Description automatically generated

Jeremy Kuzmarov

In the 1990 movie, Air America, Mel Gibson and Robert Downey, Jr., play two Air America pilots who smuggle heroin while supporting U.S. proxies in the Vietnam War.

Air America was an airline run by the CIA previously called Civil Air Transport (CAT), which had been formed by General Claire Chennault and Whiting Willauer[1] to ferry supplies to the Chinese Guomindang (GMD) in its war against the Chinese Communist Party in the 1940s.

Known as the “Flying Tigers” because of the insignia that they crafted on their planes, CAT pilots provided combat support to U.S. and allied troops in the Korean War and carried out clandestine intelligence operations over China.

In the Indochina War in Laos, Air America played a key role in supplying the CIA’s Hmong clandestine army and ferrying troops involved in clandestine operations.

The airline became known as “Air Opium” for its role in trafficking drugs grown in the Golden Triangle by the Hmong, whose chief Vang Pao was arrested but never prosecuted for drug smuggling.

After the Indochina War ended, Air America pilots continued to smuggle drugs from the Golden Triangle to help fund CIA black operations, laundering their money through the Nugan Hand Bank in Australia that was set up by a Laos secret war veteran.

New Legislation

Glenn Grothman is a Republican House representative from Wisconsin and critic of the so-called “deep state” who is currently sponsoring legislation that would guarantee retirement benefits and official recognition for the 1,000 U.S. citizens who worked for Air America.

Air America pilots killed in action would be included on the CIA’s Memorial Wall (the so-called “Wall of Stars”) which memorializes agency employees who died in the line of service.

Hired as covert operatives, Air America employees were not provided standard government forms and are unable to prove their federal employment status, which is necessary to qualify for retirement benefits. However, Grothman said that “these patriots risked their lives fighting communism in the same way members of the Air Force did.”

Grothman’s sentiments are echoed by Mark Warner (D-VA) who is sponsoring a Senate version of the bill with Marco Rubio (R-FL), the vice chair of the Senate intelligence committee.

Warner said: “I’m proud to introduce this legislation to provide well-earned benefits and formally recognize the courage of Air Americans during the U.S. war effort in Vietnam and Southeast Asia.”

While CovertAction Magazine concedes that Air America pilots should receive government pensions (like any government employee), the magazine objects to the characterization of Air America veterans as heroes.

In an article about the Air America pension legislation in The Intercept, Tim Weiner, author of a CIA history called Legacy of Ashes, is quoted, saying that “the whole point of Air America was to kill communists.”

In the opinion of CovertAction Magazine, this was not a heroic undertaking.

The Communists in Southeast Asia were at the vanguard of national liberation struggles and often the primary political group promoting land reform, and government investment in education, literacy and health care.

The U.S. objectives in stamping out communism related largely to threats of communist regimes undercutting foreign investment opportunities for U.S. corporations through nationalization policies, closing down U.S. military bases and undercutting U.S. global power.

Air Opium

In The Intercept article, Weiner dismisses the idea that Air America pilots smuggled drugs, stating that “there were rogue Air America pilots, but the story that the CIA was smuggling dope for profit or political advantage [in the Indochina War] is almost entirely a canard.”

Weiner is wrong, as opium is a vital cash crop in Southeast Asia that was grown by the Hmong in Laos and was a key means of raising black funds in the U.S.-led secret war.

The Office of Strategic Services (OSS) had first engaged in the opium trade in Burma and China during the Pacific War, recognizing that opium in the region was a substitute currency.

General William “Ray” Peers, commander of OSS Detachment 101 in Burma, confessed in his autobiography: “If opium could be useful in achieving victory, the pattern was clear. We would use opium.”

After the triumph of the Maoists in China’s civil war in 1949 (known as the “loss of China” in the U.S.), General Peers, as CIA station chief in Taipei, arranged for CAT (aka Air America) to support incursions by defeated GMD soldiers from Burma into China’s Yunnan province, thus enabling the GMD to bring to market one-third of the world’s illicit opium supply.[2]

The CIA also set up a front corporation, Sea Supply, that built airstrips so CAT planes could fly opium out of Thailand, where the drug trade was run by CIA assets such as police chief Phao Sinyanon.

In a June 1968 exposé in Ramparts magazine, University of California at Berkeley Professor Peter Dale Scott wrote that the CIA was flying opium on behalf of its Laotian clients “in harmless looking suitcases” in Air America planes to heroin-processing laboratories in Hong Kong.

In, “Air America: Flying the U.S. into Laos” (Ramparts, February 1970), Scott estimated that, at the peak of the Vietnam War, Air America flew around 6,000 tons of opium per month.

Scott wrote that “the use of illegal narcotics networks to fight communism seems to have been sanctioned inside the United States. With the maturation of both capitalism and Third World nationalism, wealthy U.S. interests have resorted systematically to organized outlaws to pursue their operations.”[3]

Alfred W. McCoy’s 1972 exposé, The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia,[4] provided extensive documentation of the CIA’s coordination of the Southeast Asian drug trade, which has since been bolstered by further evidence.[5]

CIA officers admitted to journalist Douglas Valentine that they ran the drug traffic in Southeast Asia during the Vietnam War.

In an exclusive interview with CovertAction Magazine, Valentine said that Weiner is “a lying sack of shit,” pointing to different passages in his books that disproved his analysis.

In Pisces Moon: The Dark Arts of Empire (2023), Valentine quotes CIA officer William Young, who said that an Air America pilot named Robert “Dutch” Brongersma was a key figure who oversaw CIA involvement in the Southeast Asian drug trade in collaboration with Thai military intelligence.[6]

CIA operative Anthony Poshepny told Valentine that C-47 Air America planes flown by Taiwanese pilots would fly for 13 hours out of the Lao-Thai border town of Houei Sai with opium packed in Styrofoam drums, and that the CIA gave Vang Pao, whom Poshepny referred to as a “crook,” his own planes with crews of GMD mercenaries who flew narcotics to cash customers around Southeast Asia.[7]

In The Strength of the Wolf: The Secret History of America’s War on Drugs (2003), Valentine quoted John Evans, deputy to Federal Bureau of Narcotics (FBN) enforcement chief John Enright in 1966, who said he saw documents that proved that, using Air America, the CIA underwrote the entire Guomindang drug network throughout Southeast Asia.

Enright said that that was why they called Air America “Air Opium.”[8]

In my own research in the FBN records at the National Archives, I found files referencing drug smuggling by Air America planes and its Lao subsidiary, Air Vientiane, and arrest records for Air America pilots caught smuggling drugs in Indochina, including a major bust at the Tan Son Nhut Airport in Saigon.[9]

Major Stanley C. Hobbs was caught smuggling 57 pounds of Burmese opium from Bangkok in August 1964 to a clique of South Vietnamese officers. His punishment was being forced to pay a small fine as the FBN was thrown out of Laos to prevent the compromising of “national security” operations.

[…]

Via https://covertactionmagazine.com/2024/01/29/new-legislation-supports-doling-out-money-to-cia-drug-runners-from-indochina-war/

Hamas studying Gaza cease-fire proposal, but seems to rule out key provisions

Posted on by
Reply

By BASSEM MROUE and SAMY MAGDY

BEIRUT (AP) — Hamas officials said Friday that the group is studying a proposed cease-fire deal that would include prolonged pauses in fighting in Gaza and swaps of Israeli hostages for Palestinian prisoners, but the militants appeared to rule out some key components.

Hamas remains committed to its initial demands for a permanent cease-fire, the group’s top political leader Ismail Haniyeh and a senior Beirut-based official, Osama Hamdan, said. Hamdan also said the group seeks the release of thousands of Palestinian prisoners being held for acts related to the conflict with Israel, including those serving life sentences.

He mentioned two by name, including Marwan Barghouti, a popular Palestinian uprising leader seen as a unifying figure. Hamdan’s comments on the prisoners were the most detailed demands yet raised by the group in public.

The insistence on large-scale prisoner releases and an end to the fighting in Gaza put the group at odds with the multi-stage proposal that officials from Egypt, Israel, Qatar and the United States put forth this week. That proposal does not include a permanent cease-fire.

[…]

Via https://apnews.com/article/israel-hamas-war-news-02-02-2024-9e0fa8990f34a0a1f51ce3614daa131b

They Don’t Want a Nation of Thinkers

Posted on by
6

The Burning Platform

When you read quotes from H.L. Mencken and John D. Rockefeller from over a century ago describing how government schools, in conspiracy with Big Business, had the sole purpose of matriculating non-thinking, non-questioning, standardized robotic workers into the workforce, you understand why the country is in such a state of degeneracy, degradation, debt, and dumbed down state of infantilism. This didn’t happen over night.

It was a plan implemented methodically over the last century by those controlling the levers of society. They were described succinctly by Edward Bernays in his 1928 book Propaganda as:

“Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. …We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.”

These men operate in the shadows; have enormous wealth which they use to buy politicians, academics, government bureaucrats, the media, international organizations, and technological platforms; and have a primary objective of increasing their wealth, power and control, while enslaving the working class in debt, and keeping them distracted with high tech bread and circuses. Even though a few slip through their net, educate themselves, think critically, question everything, and distrust their government, they probably comprise less than 5% of the population.

After decades of government indoctrination, propaganda, disinformation, and Big Corporation poisoning of mind and body, the ignorant masses have become so mentally and physically debilitated they are incapable of comprehending how they have been manipulated and misled and unequipped to revolt against their captors. The covid/vaccine scamdemic was the ultimate test, and the ignorant masses failed miserably. The noose is tightening and they are still focused on Taylor Swift, the stock market, climate change, border invasion, and ongoing presidential political clown show.

They have a number of irons in the fire to utilize in taking away more of your liberties, freedoms, rights, and wealth. These irons include: possible war with Iran, Russia, and China; possible civil war initiated with Texas over the border invasion; the fake climate emergency; Disease X or some other fake health crisis; denying Trump the presidency in 2024 through illegal means; and whatever financial crisis they create as cover for more pillaging the national treasury.

The Great Taking/Great Reset is real. They want it all and they will take it, if we let them. You will own nothing, if they have their way. They have the power and will not relinquish it willingly. The power will need to be reclaimed through the use of force, cunning, and surprise. We can’t let them set the rules of the conflict. The 5% constituting the critical thinkers will need to convince a portion of the ignorant masses to start thinking. We will need to throw sand into the gears of their machinery. The middle level bureaucrats doing the bidding of the elite ruling class, will need to worry about whether they will make it home at night to their families. Removing ourselves from their system will further degrade their system.

Apathy and passivity are no longer possible when they are trying to strip you of your wealth and force you into their digital gulag of CBDCs and social credit scores. Obedience to corrupt, powerful, psychopaths who want us dead is an unacceptable choice for me. Voting is absolutely worthless at this point. The politicians are not running anything. The system has been rigged to benefit the few, while impoverishing the rest. When they pull the plug on this system, they have “legally” arranged for all the wealth to be consolidated in their hands. We know what they want. The question is whether we allow it to happen.

[…]

Via https://www.theburningplatform.com/2024/02/01/they-dont-want-a-nation-of-critical-thinkers/

 

An Analysis of The Case Against Dr Reiner Fullmich

Posted on by
2

Rhoda Wilson

Even before the main proceedings against Dr. Reiner Füllmich, the courts indicate what they intend to do – a short trial and a quick verdict against the critical lawyer and human rights activist: They imposed a muzzle with a penalty clause on a Füllmich lawyer, ignored requests from the defense, disregarded legal deadlines and constructed a case that it doesn’t even exist. Did the verdict come down before the first day of the trial even began? Wolfgang Jeschke.

[…]

Illegal Kidnapping and Deprivation of Liberty

After the illegal kidnapping of Füllmich from Mexico (due to the lack of an international arrest warrant, the lawyer was only arrested at Frankfurt Airport. The kidnapping was coordinated with the Mexican authorities, who accompanied Füllmich to the Federal Republic of Germany and then handed him over to the Federal Republic of Germany police), the second act now follows the unlawful persecution of the indomitable critic.

Reiner Füllmich should be silenced. He was locked up because of allegations made by his alleged colleagues on the Corona Committee: Justus Hoffmann, Marcel Templin and Antonia Fischer. They drafted an opulent criminal complaint, which ultimately enabled Füllmich to be arrested and deprived of his freedom, which continues to this day.

Of the many accusations that Hoffmann and his accomplices had woven into their suspicions, some of which were clearly false, only one accusation remained for the criminal proceedings in the current partial opening: Dr. Füllmich is said to have embezzled 700,000 euros and used it for his own purposes. A bizarre accusation, because there are contracts and receipts for the 700,000 euros.

[…]

There are contracts with the Corona Committee for the loans to Füllmich, concluded with his then co-partner Viviane Fischer, who also took on a loan of 100,000 euros. She signed the loan agreements and is also authorized to sign for the Corona Committee’s gold reserve. Füllmich and Fischer can only access the gold reserves together.

The court apparently understood that Füllmich and Fischer documented the events together transparently. But instead of acknowledging that these are normal civil law agreements between managing partners, they constructed a collusive – illegal – collaboration between the two heads of the Corona Committee at the time and a “disloyalty” on the part of Dr. Füllmich.

But if Viviane Fischer was involved, why were the investigations against her stopped? The reason for discontinuing the investigation against Viviane Fischer in June 2023 was that she could have repaid the loan. Which she did, albeit belatedly. The same should have applied to Reiner Füllmich – if over one million euros of the purchase price of his house had not been diverted to another account.

In a letter dated August 10, 2023, the public prosecutor’s office announced that the application to reopen the investigation against Viviane Fischer for infidelity and/or aiding and abetting infidelity had been approved and that the investigation had also been resumed against Viviane Fischer.

Muzzle for Defense

Deconstructing the allegations is quite simple: the loans were based on contracts, were listed in the company’s financial documentation and they were supposed to be repaid. In the case of Füllmich after selling his property. However, this was thwarted by those people who filed the complaint against Dr. Füllmich refunded. They managed to divert 1,158,000 euros of the purchase price into their own account, namely the lawyer Marcel Templin. As a result, Füllmich lacked the funds to repay the loan.

Dagmar Schön, one of Reiner Füllmich’s lawyers, pointed out in a Bittel TV program that a large part of the sum that Füllmich allegedly appropriated was already in an account belonging to one of the complainants. This clarified two things: 1. why Dr. Füllmich was unable to repay the loan and 2. that more than the loan amount was already under the control of the Corona Committee co-partners.

Hoffmann and his accomplices were not pleased by this clarification from the lawyer Schön – they obtained in court, at the Berlin Regional Court, that Dagmar Schön was not allowed to express the true fact that significant funds (1,158,000 euros) from the house sale were in Marcel Templin’s account lay. The Berlin judge Wiesener thus ordered the prohibition of asserting a proven fact – the judge Wiesener therefore prohibited the statement of a truth that would exonerate the defendant and incriminate the complainant. The court has the documents that prove that this large amount of money was diverted to Marcel Templin’s account.

The justification for the ban on statements is downright absurd: the money that the buyer of the property transferred to Marcel Templin is not identical to that which Füllmich received through the loan agreements . Does Judge Wiesener live in old crime novels where money was moved in suitcases? In times of digital transactions, there is no money that can have a physical identity.

[…]

A further problem arises from the decision of the Berlin judge Wiesener: the ban on statements that was imposed on the defense with the verdict violates the rights of the defendant. While the prosecution sends out press releases publicly describing the allegations, the defense has been prohibited from commenting on exculpatory circumstances. However, until a verdict is reached, a defendant is presumed innocent. He and the defense have the right to make exculpatory statements.
[…]

The Notary and the 1,158,000 Euros

The role of the notary who notarized the property sale will need to be examined in more detail. Notaries act as public officials. Notaries are obliged to be  neutral and independent  and have a duty of confidentiality. Their task includes not only the notarization of contracts, but also the official duty of executing the notarized legal transaction.

In the Füllmich case, the contracts state that the purchase price for the Füllmich property must be transferred to a Füllmich account. This is how the notary certified it. After the contract was concluded, the notary instructed the buyers to transfer large parts of the purchase price to Marcel Templin’s account. In doing so, the notary may have violated his fundamental notary duties and his duty of neutrality. His conduct in the course of the real estate transaction will be the subject of separate investigations.

Biased Judges – Political Process?

The lawyers of Dr. Füllmich with several requests for bias. It shows a chain of misconduct to the detriment of the person being persecuted. Everything indicates that a short trial should be made against Reiner Füllmich.

The three judges disregarded legal deadlines (which is an official misconduct), ignored the arrest complaint and did not take it into account in the partial opening decision of the trial. The three judges also rejected a request from the defense for an extension of the deadline, which was based on the illness of both lawyers.

The application for bias further complains that it was not taken into account that the public prosecutor’s office allowed the defense to inspect the files after a long delay. Incomplete transmission of the files, the decision on the detention complaint without an oral hearing, the opening of proceedings before the investigation has been completed and other reasons suggest that the judges of the 5th criminal chamber are biased.

Likewise, the Göttingen judges Schindler, Wedekamp and Hoock did not take into account numerous exculpatory circumstances that speak for the innocence of the person being persecuted. Above all, the fact that Reiner Füllmich wanted and was able to repay the loans was not taken into account. This is the only way the allegations can be sustained – by the court ignoring facts and shaping the “case” in such a way that a conviction can occur.

Serious official misconduct to the detriment of the defendant:

According to the defense and current case law, the judges Schindler, Wedekamp and Hoock were guilty of serious official misconduct. They were obliged to check the electronic file receipt because they knew that the defense’s briefs were received by the court electronically. The three judges also knew that further documents would be submitted by the defense. At the same time, there was an application for an extension of the deadline until January 5th. For these reasons, they were obliged to check whether there was an entry in the court’s electronic mailbox.

If they had dutifully carried out this check, they would have found that on the night of January 3rd. Something had been received – namely a justified complaint about arrest. The judges Schindler, Wedekamp and Hoock should have dealt with this detention complaint as a priority and would not have been able to open the proceedings. They didn’t do that. This behavior is a serious misconduct . As a result, this serious misconduct must also be punished by disciplinary measures. This alone substantiates the application for bias against judges Schindler, Wedekamp and Hoock – because a motion for bias is always justified when there is a serious official misconduct that also requires disciplinary action.

Furthermore, the criminal complaint against Justus Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer for false suspicion remains unconsidered, as does the question of whether Justus Hoffmann and Marcel Templin – possibly together with the notary who carried out the notarization – illegally gained access to the largest part of the proceeds from the sale of the property. Despite these suspicions, Hoffmann and his accomplices are called as witnesses against Reiner Füllmich.

What also seems strange is the summoning of witnesses who cannot provide any material contribution to the charge of breach of trust. Among other things, the notary who notarized the Füllmichs’ real estate sale is supposed to testify as a witness. Calling him and others as witnesses makes no sense since they cannot make any contributions to the question of infidelity. On the contrary: In court, witnesses can always rely on Section 55 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and refuse to testify if they could incriminate themselves by doing so. The more intensively you look into the case, the greater the bugbear that is being built here becomes apparent. The suspicion that it will be a short political process is becoming more and more confirmed.

With their behavior, the judges violate the principle of the presumption of innocence and deny Reiner Füllmich the right to a fair trial guaranteed under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

[…]

Abuse of the criminal justice system

[…]

The disputes between the members of the Corona Committee are classic civil law disputes between shareholders. Therefore, they belong in mediation discussions or civil law proceedings. However, civil legal proceedings cost money and sometimes take a long time. Shifting the claim clarification via a creatively designed criminal complaint avoids costs and can shorten the procedure. And since you have done the system a favor here, you can count on a positive verdict. Because the system wants to silence Füllmich. This is only possible with a guilty verdict, which in turn requires the civil law issues to be clarified in the same proceedings. 2 in 1: The Federal Republic of Germany silences a critic and the complainants get their reward.

[…]

Via https://expose-news.com/2024/02/02/the-prejudice-of-dr-reiner-fullmich-an-analysis-of-the-case-against-him/