Episode 3 Ancient Egyptian Thought

The History of Ancient Egypt

Professor Robert Brier

Film Review

In the Egyptian origin myth, the world began with eight paired gods who emerged from formless water:

• Hok and Hoket – gods of formlessness
• Kuk and Kuket – god of darkness
• Amun and Amunet – gods of hiddenness
• Nun and Nunet – gods he primordial waters.

The moment creation took place, a mound of earth formed and Atum created himself on this mound.

Atum had two children: Shu (Air) and Tefnet (Moisture). They give birth to the god Geb (Earth) and the goddess Nut (Sky). The sky goddess drapes herself around the earth, swallows the sun everything evening and births it again  in the morning.

Geb and Nut

Geb and Nut gave birth to four gods: Osiris and Ist (referred to as Isis in Greek), Set (Evil) and Nephythys (goddess of death).

Set

Osiris and Ist (Isis)

Osiris and Ist came to earth to civilize Egypt (introducing domesticated crops and animals) and protect humanity against Set. Set built a wooden chest exactly fitting Osiris’s body, tricked him into lying in it, covered it with molten lead and threw it into the Nile (which killed Osiris).

The chest washed ashore tree Biblos (Lebanon), where a tree, which is ultimately used for a pillar in the king’s palace, encompassed the chest in its growing trunk. When Ist retrieved the body and returned it to Egypt, she hacked it into 13 pieces. Unable to find the phallus, she reassembled and buried the body with an artificial one. Osiris subsequently became god of the dead and ancient Egyptians prayed for resurrection in his name.

This origin story is essential to the ancient Egyptian culture of embalming corpses to ensure their life after death. They also adopted a body-shaped chest (sarcophagus) Osiris was trapped in as a specialized mummy case to preserve the body in.

Film can be viewed free with a library card on Kanopy.

https://www.kanopy.com/en/pukeariki/video/1492791/1492797

(Illustration by The Epoch Times, Getty Images, Shutterstock)

Zero Hedge

President Joe Biden’s new EV mandates will likely prove to be a sizable wealth transfer from rural red regions of America to urban blue sections, and to wealthy Democrats who reside in them, according to reports.

On March 20, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized its tailpipe emissions rules for the auto industry starting in 2027.

These rules are the strictest in history and will effectively force carmakers to have one-third of new car sales be plug-in electric vehicles (EVs) by 2027 and more than two-thirds by 2032.

This represents a dramatic increase from current EV sales, which were about 8 percent of the new car market in 2023.

Climate activists cheered the EPA’s move, with the Environmental Defense Fund calling it “a day to celebrate American achievement.”

But critics say that the measures will be particularly punitive for huge segments of the U.S. population who don’t want, can’t use, or can’t afford EVs. If carmakers go along with President Biden’s plan to shift their fleets to EVs, the cost of remaining gas-fired cars and trucks will likely escalate as demand dwarfs supply.

“This isn’t industrial policy,” Robert Bryce, author and energy analyst, told The Epoch Times. “In reality it’s a type of class warfare that will prevent low- and middle-income consumers from being able to afford new cars.”

And as many traditional car buyers struggle, the federal subsidies and incentives continue to flow, to the benefit of EV buyers.

According to an October 2023 report by the Texas Public Policy Foundation, as much as $48,000 of the cost of the average EV sold in the United States is paid, not by the owner, but in the form of “socialized costs” that are spread out among taxpayers and electricity consumers over a 10-year period.

These socialized costs come in the form of taxes, government subsidies, fuel economy credits paid by gas carmakers to EV manufacturers, and higher electricity bills as consumers absorb the capital costs required to expand the power grid and install new charging stations.

The report states that “the average model year 2021 EV would cost $48,698 more to own over a 10-year period without $22 billion in government favors given to EV manufacturers and owners.”

These dollars, which do not take into account the additional dollars that gas-car owners will likely pay for their vehicles as manufacturers are forced to make fewer of them, amount to a government-mandated wealth transfer to affluent EV owners, paid by those who often cannot afford to buy EVs.

The new EPA mandate is “aimed at accommodating a very narrow segment of the auto-buying public: wealthy, white Democrats who live in a handful of liberal communities,” Mr. Bryce said. “EV ownership is largely defined by class, ideology, and geography.”

In a February analysis of EV buyers, Mr. Bryce reported that 57 percent of them earn more than $100,000 annually, 75 percent are male, and 87 percent are white. In addition, EV buyers are overwhelmingly Democrats, with 71 percent of Republicans stating in a Gallup poll that they would not consider owning an electric vehicle.

A 2023 University of California Energy Institute report found “a strong and enduring correlation between political ideology and U.S. EV adoption.”

Looking at county-level data on new vehicle registrations between 2012 and 2022, the report stated that 50 percent of all new EVs were sold into the top 10 percent of most-Democrat counties, with 70 percent going to the top 25 percent most-Democrat counties, and 90 percent going to the top 50 percent most-Democrat counties.

Twenty counties bought 40 percent of all EVs sold in this period, the report states, and “most of these counties are urban, high-income, and in Democratic states.”

One-third of EV Buyers Live in California

Data from the Department of Energy supports this view. As of year-end 2022, California had 903,600 registered EVs in the state, or 37 percent of all EVs owned nationwide.

The next largest number of EV owners were in Florida, Texas, and Washington state, with 168,000, 149,000, and 104,100 EVs respectively, followed by New Jersey, New York, Georgia, Colorado, Illinois, Massachusetts, Virginia, Maryland, and Pennsylvania.

The states on this list are home to large cities and suburbs, which are the target market for EVs. This contrasts sharply with rural states like Wyoming and North Dakota, where 800 and 600 EV owners reside, respectively.

According to a report by the Committee to Unleash Prosperity, “if you count all the EVs in North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Mississippi, West Virginia, Alabama, Montana, and Idaho, they account for less than one percent of the total U.S. sales.”

Of the top 10 states in terms of EV per capita ownership, seven are “deep blue states,” the report notes.

“By contrast, the 10 states with the smallest market penetration for EVs were all red states,” Unleash Prosperity states.

“Ironically, Joe Biden is the worst thing that ever happened to this industry. EVs have become ‘Biden cars.’”

The Biden administration is not alone in attempting to force Americans to switch to electric cars. A number of blue states including California, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Vermont, Washington are on track to ban the sale of new gas-powered cars and trucks by 2035, according to non profit group Coltura, which advocates for the switch from gasoline to electric cars.

The lack of interest in EVs among red states isn’t merely a political issue, however. There are practical reasons why people are unwilling to spend thousands of dollars more on electric cars. According to a November 2023 AAA survey, the primary reasons for people not to buy electric cars are a lack of charging stations, limited range, and time to charge the battery.

A recent Rasmussen poll found that 65 percent of Americans surveyed don’t think they’re likely to make an EV their next automobile purchase.

[…]

Via https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/behind-ev-push-wealth-transfer-red-blue-regions

Zero Hedge

When people couldn’t afford housing during the Great Depression, they built shantytowns from scrap construction supplies and named them “Hoovervilles,” after President Herbert Hoover. Today, Americans increasingly live out of their cars because they can’t afford housing. If history is any guide, will parking lots full of Americans soon be known as “Bidenvilles”?

The problem has gotten so bad that Sedona, Arizona, recently set aside a parking lot exclusively for these homeless workers. The city is even installing toilets and showers for the new occupants.

Apparently, the City Council thought installing temporary utilities was cheaper than solving the area’s cost-of-living crisis.

And what a crisis it is.

The average home in the city sells for $930,000, while most of the housing available for rent is not apartments, but luxury homes targeted at wealthy people on vacation.

With such a shortage of middle-class housing and with starter homes essentially nonexistent, low- and even middle-income blue-collar workers have nowhere to go at night but their back seat.

Much like America’s Great Depression in the 1930s, this marks a serious regression in our national standard of living. But shantytowns were not prevalent in the 1920s (a decade that began with a depression) or the 1910s. Nor were they ubiquitous following the Panic of 1907, which set off one of the worst recessions in American history.

Indeed, Americans in the Great Depression faced such a cost-of-living crisis that many were forced to accept a standard of living below what their parents and even their grandparents had.

Fast-forward about 90 years, and countless families are in the same boat. Many young people today don’t think they’ll ever be able to achieve the American dream of homeownership that their parents and grandparents achieved. The worst inflation in 40 years, rising interest rates, and a collapse of real (inflation-adjusted) earnings mean a huge step backward financially.

That inflation has pushed up rents so much that young Americans are moving back in with their parents at rates not seen since the Great Depression because they can’t make it on their own. Sometimes, they can’t even make it with multiple roommates.

But many people cannot move back in with family, so the car it is.

The housing problem is not limited to wealthy towns in Arizona, however. It is systemic. The monthly mortgage payment on a median-price home has doubled since January 2021, and rents are at record highs. Like the Great Depression, this disaster stems from impolitic public policy.

For the past several years, the government has spent, borrowed, and created trillions of dollars it didn’t have. The predictable result of this profligacy was runaway inflation, followed by equally foreseeable interest rate increases.

The deadly combination of high prices and high interest rates has frozen the housing market and reduced homeownership affordability metrics to near-record lows. In several major metropolitan areas, it takes more than 100 percent of the median household after-tax income to afford a median-price home.

Since rents and virtually all other prices have risen so much faster than incomes over the past three years, even renting is unaffordable today, so many people have to go into debt to keep a roof over their heads. And for some, that’s a car roof.

This is the kind of story you might expect from a Third World country or somewhere behind the Iron Curtain during the Cold War, not the largest economy in the world—at least not outside of a depression like the one in the 1930s.

Hoover certainly deserved some blame for the Great Depression, but so did the progressives in Congress, who came from both parties and repeatedly voted to meddle in the economy instead of allowing it to recover from the initial downturn.

Similarly, President Joe Biden deserves blame for constantly advocating runaway government spending.

But today’s multitrillion-dollar deficits are also made possible by the big spenders in Congress, who come from both parties.

If this bipartisan prodigality of Washington continues, Bidenvilles will only become more widespread as the housing affordability crisis worsens.

[…]

Via https://www.zerohedge.com/political/automobile-bidenvilles-are-new-shantytowns-amid-us-housing-affordability-crisis

By Ruth Hill, of RNZ

More than 8000 unvaccinated or partly vaccinated health workers were allowed to keep working during the Covid-19 pandemic because critical services could not function without them.Data released to RNZ under the Official Information Act, shows health providers – including district health boards, GP clinics and home-help agencies — made 516 applications for exemptions to avoid Significant Service Disruptions of which 102 were granted.

Of the 8051 healthworkers covered by these exemptions between October 2021 and September 2022, more than 5000 were employed by district health boards.Nearly half, 3935, were care and support workers — but the total also included 352 doctors (out of nearly 19,000 registered), 992 administration workers, 788 allied health professionals and 1984 nurses and midwives.

The Nurses Organisation, which represents 60,000 plus nurses and midwives, noted those exempted were a tiny minority of the total health workforce.

Kaiwhakahaere Kerri Nuku said the union was not given a lot of information about the reasons for exemptions at the time.

“And that’s why these figures are quite alarming to us, because we just don’t know what sits behind that.”

Given it was a public health emergency, it was essential to get as many people vaccinated as possible, Nuku said.

However, she readily admitted it would have been preferable to allow a more nuanced approach for some individuals, if there had been more time to prepare.

“This was a really difficult time for all in the workforce. Every nurse goes to work to do the best they possibly can, and these vaccine mandates certainly posed many good people against one another, and we have to do things better.”

Recent research by Auckland University of Technology published in February concluded mandates had limited effect on increasing vaccine uptake among the country’s 171,486 healthcare workers.

Economics professor Gail Pacheco, who co-authored the study, said almost 90 percent of healthcare workers had already received two doses of the vaccine when the mandates were announced in October 2021.

There was no sudden jump: vaccination coverage among healthcare workers increased at the same steady rate until it hit more than 95 percent, she said.

But what mandates definitely did was damage pay and career prospects for unvaccinated workers.

“In addition to not improving vaccine uptake, the employment rate fell by 15 per cent and earnings fell by 19 per cent compared to vaccinated workers not subjected to the mandate.”

Pacheco, director of the New Zealand Policy Research Institute at AUT, said the mandates may have eroded trust in the government.

“And it could also have strengthened the anti-vax sentiment more generally, which will not only affect uptake of the Covid vaccine, but more routine immunisations as well.”

Partly that was because people did not like being “told what to do”, she said.

“There was a German survey that found just over 3 per cent of people said they would not want the Covid-19 vaccination if it was voluntary. But that increased to more than than 16% if it was mandatory.”

Another 6410 people received a temporary medical exemption between November 2021 and September 2022 — of whom 89 per cent had had a recent Covid-19 infection.

Health New Zealand Te Whatu Ora says some of these people could have been included in the Significant Service Disruption Exemptions, but it did not track the potential overlap.

Pacheco said none of the health workers interviewed for the study saw themselves as “anti-vaccine”.

Many received exemptions after suffering an adverse reaction to the first dose, or due to an underlying medical condition.

But they struggled with the hostile reaction from other people, including workmates.

One nurse told researchers:

“We’re supposed to be a caring profession. Nothing about this is caring Due to no fault of my own, I have now been labelled an anti-vaxxer and anti-science, and in some people’s opinion, not worthy of calling myself a nurse. This hurts me immensely. This is what mandates have done. There is no room for individual circumstances.”

[…]

Via https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/04/03/8000-health-workers-kept-working-despite-not-being-fully-vaccinated/

ELSA

CRUCIAL DOSSIER. DOSSIER REINER FUELLMICH. Comprehensive analysis and recommendations for dealing with Reiner Fuellmich.

On Reiner’s first court appearance after the long Easter break, he and his legal team made what can easily be termed bombshell – that there has been a Dossier Reiner Fuellmich from the German state with the express purpose to take him out, notably out of any possibility of gaining a position in the political arena.

I understand the concerns of the German state. Here was someone with integrity and courage, with charisma and intelligence, with extensive experience plus shared leadership in a small German political party. Very appealing to many people fed up with mandates, loss of freedom of speech, mass immigration, and ever so much else. Here was a suitable leader.

Anyway, here is the Dossier, from bittel.tv. You can also find it on Roger Bittel’s Telegram channel:
👉 Dossier Deutsch (https://t.me/bitteltv/25826)
👉 further languages (https://t.me/bitteltv/25838)
👉 the full broadcast (https://t.me/bitteltv/25839)

All of the dossier is important. However, you may be most interested in the last section:

Report and recommendations for action regarding Reiner Fuellmich

Date: August 24, 2021

Author: B**

Subject: Comprehensive analysis and recommendations for dealing with Reiner Fuellmich

Included within this last section:

The awarding of or the possibility of obtaining politically exposed offices must be prevented by all means within the rule of law.

How is this to be done:

The initiation of criminal proceedings on the basis of the evidence collected against Reiner Fuellmich must be prepared. This includes cooperation with public prosecutors [bolding and italics mine] and the preparation of charges in the event of demonstrable violations of the law. Any necessary constructions must be weighed up and suitable third parties recruited [bolding and italics mine].

NOW HERE, THE FULL DOSSIER. I RECOMMEND READING IT.

http://www.bittel.tv / Broadcast from 2.4.2024

Dossier Reiner Fuellmich

Reiner Fuellmich, co-chairman and candidate for chancellor of the party “dieBasis”, is a German lawyer who has become known in particular for his involvement in various legal disputes and his public statements on various issues, including the measures and political decisions relating to the COVID-19 pandemic. His views and legal activities have attracted both national and international attention and are the subject of controversy.

Professional career:

Reiner Fuellmich began his legal career after graduating from law school. He is licensed to practice law in Germany and in California, USA. Over many years, he has specialized in various areas of civil law and has been involved in several legal disputes, some of which have attracted considerable media attention.

Engagement against banks and corporations:

Before the COVID-19 pandemic, Fuellmich made a name for himself in particular through his involvement in cases against large banks and companies. These often involved consumer protection and claims for damages.

[…]

Via https://alethonews.com/2024/04/05/reiner-fuellmich-team-find-bombshell-evidence-of-a-dossier-showing-conspiracy-to-deal-with-him/

>

Marthad Shingiro Umucyaba & Aidan Jonah

Canada’s descent into fascism will be spearheaded by Global Affairs Canada, headed by the genocidal maniac, Melanie Joly. Joly, as a representative of Canada’s currently governing Liberal Party, will invoke the Nazi cells and pro-colonial propaganda divisions hidden and sheltered throughout the Canadian political environment, including the Ukrainian Canadian Congress, the Estonian Central Council, and the MacDonald-Laurier Institute.

The first major indication of this fact is a Global Affairs Canada two-part interview where a senior fellow of all three aforementioned rightist organisations, Marcus Kolga, is interviewed to explain “disinformation”.

Meanwhile, the Liberal Party as a whole has also moved to rehabilitate Jaroslav Hunka, with the complicity of every other political party in Canada’s parliament.  The invited witness to a Canadian parliament committee, Dr. Lubomyr Luciuk, spread Nazi apologia  including a vigorous defense of the Waffen SS 14th Division (Galicia), which was explained in detail by Aidan Jonah’s recent article for The Canada Files.

So what do these shameless events indicate for Canada’s “liberal democratic” political direction? If Jaroslav Hunka does receive Dr. Luciuk’s sought after “apology” from the House of Commons, then every racialized diaspora in Canada should buckle up.

Who is Marcus Kolga?

Marcus Kolga, the project lead for the Macdonald-Laurier Institute’s US government-funded Disinfowatch.org, is the “disinformation expert” invited by Global Affairs Canada to gaslight the Canadian public about Stalin, the KGB, communism, and the Russians in general. He’s infamous for multiple reasons.

One being a 2018 paper for the Macdonald-Laurier Institute that quietly spewed apologia for an event commemorating the Estonian Nazi formations that fought on the Tannenberg Line, including the 20th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS (1st Estonian), the Estonian Legion, and the 3rd Estonian SS Volunteer Brigade. Celebrated annually in NATO-controlled Estonia (page 23), the event was portrayed by Marcus Kolga as “an annual commemoration of Estonian soldiers who died on the Tannenberg Line”, which “commemorated those who resisted against the Soviet Red Army as the Germans retreated in 1944.”

Kolga made the claim that “Nazi” insignia at the celebration was the work of “Russian agents”.

Kolga is also known for being the President of the pro-Nazi collaborator coalition in Canada known as the Central Eastern European Council, which includes shameless organisations like the Ukrainian Canadian Council and the Estonian Foundation of Canada, who have both supported the infamous 2019 Black Ribbon Day vigils throughout Europe. The BRD vigils are for Nazi collaborators, but are disguised as vigils for the “Victims of Nazism and Stalinism”. The last one was led by CEEC in 2023 during Marcus Kolga’s ongoing tenure.

The CEEC, under Kolga’s leadership, was also a main force behind the infamous Toronto Ukraine memorial which contained apologia for the fascist OUN-B leader, Stepan Bandera.

Richard Sanders revealed that “In 2012, Estonia passed a law to hail Estonia’s Waffen SS as “freedom fighters.”  Sanders further details how “the Estonian Central Council in Canada and the Estonian World Council praise Estonia’s government,” but “have not condemned its glorification of Nazi veterans.”

Kolga, as with the Estonian Foundation of Canada Director, continued with EFC’s partnership with the ECCC, as they stayed silent about the Estonian government honouring Nazis.

Meanwhile, in more recent times, Kolga inferred that Dimitri Lascaris should be charged for visiting Crimea and doing journalism there. He also referred to University of Ottawa professor Ivan Katchanovski’s academic journal article proving that the Ukrainian government wasn’t behind the massacre of 100 Maidan protesters as a conspiracy theory (27:00 – 27:50). Further, he denied that the Myrotvorets list was a kill list designed to intimidate critics of the Ukrainian government, a kill list which has two Canadian journalists on it.

What is “disinformation”? Marcus Kolga’s Falsehoods vs Reality

Kolga’s first task for the GAC series was to define a propaganda tactic called “disinformation” (0:22-1:57), whose origins he attributed to Stalin, Lenin, and the KGB during the cold war era. He used the Russian “dezinformatsiya” translation as its nefarious “origin”. Capitalist Jeremy Norman, another shill for NATO, claims the term “dezinformatsiya” is coined from Stalin himself, linking it to an alleged “KGB Black Propaganda” department.

Notwithstanding the fact that the NKVD did not transition into the KGB until 1956, three years after Stalin’s death in 1953, and that Lenin died in 1924, well before the USSR was officially established in 1936, even the term “disinformation” was used in American press well before even the 1917 Russian Revolution. The term was used in its original English in American papers as early as 1887, if not even earlier.

In fact, “Black Propaganda”, where scandalous statements are falsely attributed to someone else, was an early American colonial tactic against Indigenous nations. It was also a regular tactic employed by the Nazis in the areas under their colonial occupation, such as Ukraine and Denmark. The Irony is that the very act of attributing the “disinformation” and “black propaganda” tactics to the enemies of NATO are shameless acts of hypocrisy and projection, both historically and in the present day.

The Nazi apologist professor of the Royal Military College: Dr. Lubomyr Luciuk

Dr. Lubomyr Luciuk spent a good eight minutes (0:00-8:13) in the House of Commons spreading propaganda about the Waffen SS 14th Division and Ukrainian Nazi collaborators. He also highlighted the 1980s cover-up of Canada’s harbouring of Nazis as “evidence” of due diligence by the state on this topic, the most infamous example being the “Deschenes Commission”. Finally, he demanded an apology from the House of Commons to Jaroslav Hunka. That shameful moment in history was explained in detail by The Canada Files.

What should be noted though, is whom Dr. Luciuk held responsible for the “scrutiny” on Jaroslav Hunka, as he was demanding an “apology”. He noted the “Russian agents” and “Soviet agents” within the country and the “left-wing”, international condemnation of the standing ovation to Jaroslav Hunka notwithstanding. His comments were intentionally vague and broad, and meant to cast a wide net, Dr. Luciuk himself being an educator for the Royal Military College of Canada.

Liberal MP Jennifer O’Connell shamelessly continued the insinuation (8:13-8:32), by providing Dr. Luciuk with a leading question about how the backlash against the standing ovation and the controversy itself “were used by Russia”. The message is now clear from the Liberal Party. Any protestation against Nazi apologia will be “used by Russia”, so better to tow the line than raise objections, or else.

Global Affairs Canada and the NATO-Nazi propaganda playbook

The fact that many of the far-right Nazis that currently shape propaganda tactics in NATO and Global Affairs Canada today were brought in from abroad might give the false impression that “free” and “democratic” Canada was being tainted by malign “foreign” influence since the Second World War. The fact remains, however, that the Final Solution is a term originally coined by Canadian officials in the context of genocide. Even the forefather of Nazi ideology himself, Adolf Hitler, idolized and revered the American and Canadian actions towards Indigenous nations and was inspired by “Manifest Destiny” and the Western Expansion.

NATO ideology today, just like the Western imperialist ideology of antiquity, is pro-colonial, and viciously opposed to any ideology that diametrically opposes colonialism, such as communism. Fascism is a development in the modern capitalist state designed to protect against a communist uprising, but in general is designed to crush anti-colonial dissent. Therefore, what’s happening in Global Affairs Canada is simply Canada welcoming immigrants who’ve truly understood and embraced the essence of the Canadian experience and Canadian foreign policy: genocide and ethnic cleansing.

[…]

Via https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/04/05/canada-recruits-nazi-apologists-to-battle-disinformation-and-indoctrinate-the-public/

Dr Eddy Betterman

Before being chosen as the world’s leading provider of mRNA “vaccines” for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), pharmaceutical giant Pfizer amassed a lengthy rap sheet of criminal activity that much of the world does not even know exists.

In 2009, Pfizer was ordered to pay $2.3 billion in what the United States federal government announced was “the largest medical fraud settlement in U.S. history.” Basically, Pfizer had committed so many crimes pertaining to its vaccines and other pharmaceutical poisons that the litigation piled up sky-high, resulting in a massive settlement windfall.

At the heart of the $2.3 billion settlement was Pfizer’s illicit marketing of its drugs for purposes not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Pfizer was deemed to have committed “fraudulent marketing” and the company agreed to settle for these crimes at a dollar amount higher than any other in Big Pharma history.

In 2009, Pfizer pleaded “guilty to a felony violation of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act,” though none of its executives, including the company’s CEO, were held criminally liable. Instead, the company paid the fee and continued on, eventually becoming the leading candidate in the Operation Warp Speed scheme of the administration of former President Donald Trump. (Related: Did you hear? New research has found that mRNA injections “could have fatal consequences” – so beware!)

Pfizer violated its probation

While Pfizer was told back in 2009 to “cease its conduct of criminal activities,” the company did no such thing, despite entering into “an expansive corporate integrity agreement” with the Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

That agreement was supposed to stop Pfizer from ever again committing the same types of crimes. And yet here we are in 2024 with untold millions of people in the U.S. alone who were harmed or killed by Pfizer’s mRNA COVID injections, which were also falsely advertised as “safe and effective.”

It should be noted that back in 2009 when Pfizer entered the agreement with the OIG, the HHS was headed up by none other than Anthony Fauci. This is presumably why Pfizer was never really held accountable for its crimes against humanity, and why Pfizer would go on to commit even more crimes against humanity during COVID.

“Pfizer has casually violated the conditions of its 2009-2013 four-year probation,” reported Global Research about what transpired.

“That ‘similar conduct’ by Pfizer has been repeated in 2020-2023 in relation to a very dangerous substance (mRNA Vaccine), on a much larger scale (compared to Bextra, Celebrex in 2009).”

In other words, what we are seeing now is what happened in 2009 but on a much larger scale.

“What is unfolding is the worldwide ‘fraudulent marketing’ of a ‘killer vaccine,’” Global Research explains. “The level of criminality is beyond description.”

What was supposed to protect people from a scary Chinese virus ended up killing people en masse, driving up excess mortality all around the world. Pfizer in its own documents admits that its mRNA injection for COVID is deadly, but the world was never told about it.

“Neither the media nor the governments of 190 countries (with some exceptions) have had the courage to inform the broader public,” reports explain. “From a legal standpoint, the Pfizer’s [sic] CEOs who violated the DOJ clauses pertaining to their 2009 probation should have been arrested.

What Pfizer is guilty of is already far worse than anything mobster Al Capone did prior to being indicted on charges of tax evasion in 1931. And we know that Hollywood has made numerous productions out of Capone’s crimes – will they do the same thing to Pfizer?

[…]

Via https://dreddymd.com/2024/04/06/pfizer-criminal-record-pharmaceutical-fraudulent-snake-oil/

By Mark Goodwin and Whitney Webb

Latin America is quietly being forced into a carbon market scheme through regional contractual obligations – enforced by the satellites of a US intelligence-linked firm – which seeks to create an inter-continental “smart grid,” erode national and local sovereignty, and link carbon-based life to the debt-based monetary system via a Bitcoin sidechain.

Sweeping across the shores of Latin America comes a scheme from some of the most predatory figures in the venture capital ecosystem of the United States. It is a brazen attempt to assert foreign influence across Latin America and threatens to reshape the very fabric of the region and the day to day lives of its people. At its core is a serpentine set of contractual obligations, held at the municipal level, cast throughout Central and South America, upheld by an intelligence-linked satellite company, and controlled by a private se­ctor consortium of green-washed financiers aiming to turn the region’s forests into equity and carbon credits.

At the same time, it obliges local governments to spend “conservation” funds on projects that further financialize nature and aid the construction of an inter-continental “smart” grid. One of its key ambitions appears to be further entrenching the debt load of the region through the multi-lateral development banks and the dollarization of the continent from the subnational level up through carbon markets upheld by a digital ledger. What seems like a technological marvel aimed at progress and connectivity harbors a darker agenda — one that intertwines planetary surveillance, financial predation, geopolitical maneuvering, and the domination of a resource-rich continent buried in debt.

This grand design, known by the acronym GREEN+ and conceived by stalwarts of the digital dollar and debt schemes of the private sector, has quietly taken root through a web of political entanglements at the local level. Even a key figure in the Drexel Burnham Lambert junk bond scandal plays a role. Astonishingly, every capital city of Latin America has eagerly signed on, apparently unaware of the strings attached to these seemingly benign partnerships, while a majority of municipalities in the region have also made commitments with these same groups that will push them to join GREEN+, potentially in a matter of weeks. The (hopefully) well-meaning regional governments have unwittingly paved the way for a sweeping surveillance apparatus tied to American intelligence that threatens to erode privacy and civil liberties under the guise of progress and combating the climate crisis.

Upon further observation, GREEN+’s connections reveal a disturbing narrative of financial interests melding with geopolitical ambitions. The backers of the satellite company share ties with former members of the highest offices of US financial policy and regulation alongside the key architects and profiteers of private capital creation, aiming to consolidate control over monetary flows in Latin America within the redistribution of distressed government debt from the public to the private sector. As this two-part series will show, this concerted effort is not merely about surveillance – it’s a calculated move towards further dollarization, tightening the grip of corporate and technological monopolies over the economic landscape of the Americas.

The scheme’s proponents also speak of how it will significantly advance the “economic” and “regional” integration of the Americas, invoking visions of unity while obscuring the true nature of their agenda for economic domination and stronger regional governance. Their model, eerily reminiscent of the EU’s transition from a free trade union to a bureaucratic behemoth yoked to the US through the Eurodollar, sets the stage for unelected entities to enforce policies through programmable money, enabled by smart contracts on blockchains and designed to benefit the few at the expense of the many.

What materializes before us is not just a technological evolution but a quiet banker coup — one that lays the groundwork for land grabs and invasive surveillance under the guise of progress and conservation. It’s a narrative that echoes throughout history, where intelligence-linked figures and predatory financial interests converge to prey upon the Global South, leaving a trail of economic exploitation and geopolitical manipulation in their wake. What masquerades as progress for individuals and the environment at large may very well be the harbinger of a new era of subjugation and control.

[…]

Key to the program are the services provided by GREEN+ founding member Satellogic, an Argentina-founded company closely aligned with Peter Thiel’s Palantir and Elon Musk’s SpaceX that specializes in sub-meter resolution satellite surveillance. Satellogic, a contractor to the US government and whose founders were also previously contactors for the US’ DHS, NSA and DARPA, will provide surveillance data of the entire world’s “protected areas” to GREEN+’s governing coalition, composed of the NGOs CC35, the Global Footprint Network, The Energy Coalition and other “respected stakeholders.”

According to the press release that details Satellogic’s alliance with GREEN+, the satellite surveillance data “will enable individuals, organizations, and global markets to accurately monitor the compliance of signatory jurisdictions to avoid deforestation.” However, other information in the press release reveals that forests will actually be monitored for the purpose of generating “credible” carbon credits to be traded on exchanges by GREEN+ on behalf of subnational governments. The press release also states that the GREEN+ alliance with Satellogic will “advance the future measurement of energy emissions in the most populated areas of the planet,” i.e. the surveillance of carbon emissions from space. Satellogic launched some GREEN+-affiliated satellites in 2022 as part of its pilot and is due to launch the remainder this April during Miami Climate Week. Satellogic’s past and upcoming launches of GREEN+ satellites were/will be conducted in collaboration with Elon Musk’s SpaceX, also a contractor to the US military and US intelligence agencies.

[…]

Via https://unlimitedhangout.com/2024/04/investigative-reports/debt-from-above-the-carbon-credit-coup/