By Ilya Tsukanov – Sputnik – 07.05.2024

Russia’s Radiological, Chemical and Biological Defense Troops have spent over two years studying and publicizing sensitive documents and analytical materials on the extent of Pentagon, CDC and US biotech firms’ funding for unethical and potentially illegal military biological research in Ukraine and around the world.

US biodefense planners are preparing to release a ‘bombshell’ report calling on all levels of the US government to radically improve national biodefense measures and create a national strategy to address global biological threats.

The document, seen by Axios ahead of publication, was put together by the Bipartisan Commission on Biodefense, a panel of former high-ranking US officials and lawmakers, including senior former Clinton, Bush and Obama administration staff. The Commission, created in 2014 to “provide for a comprehensive assessment of the state of US biodefense efforts,” has called its new report the 2024 National Blueprint for Biodefense.

The ‘blueprint’ highlights the growing risks stemming from the outbreak of infectious diseases, bioweapons research and lab leaks, predicting that the number of biothreat incidents will increase over time, and urging policymakers to make major new investments in biodefense.

“We’re not putting enough emphasis on getting ahead of these biological threats,” Bipartisan Commission on Biodefense executive director Asha George said. George urged Biden National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan to spearhead a national biodefense effort and set up a deputy advisor post to deal with the job’s daily duties.

The Committee is asking Washington to create a unified federal biodefense budget, and multiyear funding for programs as part of an agenda featuring 36 separate recommendations, from the creation of a congressional working group and biodefense reviews once every four years, to amendments to the 1944 Public Health Service Act to “produce a research and development plan for reducing pathogen transmission in built environments.”

Curiously, the panel’s recommendations also feature a section on “emerging astrobiological threats,” warning about “the intersection of space exploration and infectious disease,” and of the possibility of space-based microorganisms being brought to Earth and posing a threat to the planet’s “human, animal, plant, or ecosystem health.”

Threats Closer to Home

Additional details on the contents of the report have yet to be publicized. However, based on the information made available by Axios, it will offer little if any data on the US government’s own role in creating, manipulating and spreading biological threats globally, starting with the National Institutes of Health gain of function research which may have sparked the global Covid-19 pandemic, to the operation of dozens of military-grade biolabs around the world, including in Ukraine, Africa, Asia and Latin America.

Russia’s Radiological, Chemical and Biological Defense Troops warned in January that Washington’s goals in the military-biological domain are multifold, ranging from the creation and manipulation of the causative agents of “particularly dangerous infections in regions of the world that are strategically important for the United States,” to efforts to achieve global “superiority” in biomanufacturing, biological monitoring, and the expansion of potentially unethical and illegal military biological research outside US jurisdictions.

RCBD Troops chief Lt. Gen. Igor Kirillov has indicated that the US military bioresearch program “consists of government agencies and private contractors,” including representatives of big US pharmaceutical companies and that “through the organs of the executive branch, a legislative framework is being created to finance military-biological research directly from the federal budget.” In turn, Kirillov said, “guarantees provided by the state attract funds from non-governmental organizations,” including the Clinton, Soros and Rockefeller foundations.

NATO Goes All In on Transhumanism

The ‘2024 National Blueprint for Biodefense’ report comes less than a month after the NATO alliance published details on an alarming new “international strategy to govern the responsible development and use of biotechnologies and human enhancement technologies.”

On the pretext of unsubstantiated claims that adversaries, including Russia, are planning to deploy chemical and biological weapons, the NATO strategy offers a Brave New World-style vision of the need to fast track the development of biotech and human enhancement (BHE) technologies, predicting that they will “transform our economies, societies, security and defense in unprecedented and unforeseeable ways.”

NATO cites the AI-assisted modification of biological processes, cells and cellular compounds as “opportunities” to “enhance our defense and security,” including via “biotechnological and non-biotechnological interventions that enable individuals to operate beyond normal human limits or abilities.”

This scary new BHE push has been met with opposition from social conservatives worldwide, who have cited work in this direction as a means to establishing unprecedented levels control over humanity.

[…]

Via https://sputnikglobe.com/20240507/after-positioning-military-biolabs-around-the-globe-us-officials-urge-biodefense-buildup-1118314833.html

Paul Homewood

The problem for ministers is that most consumers just won’t buy EVs

Ministers can’t get out much these days without being heckled, especially by green campaign groups such as Just Stop Oil. So no surprise that last week the secretary of state for energy security and net zero, Claire Coutinho, struggled to make herself heard above the din of demonstrators in the hall as she delivered a speech at a business conference.

Her message was definitely not what those demonstrators wanted to hear (though they aren’t in the listening business). Coutinho criticised what she called the “net zero leviathan of central planning” and said that products designed to meet this target should not be “forced on British consumers”.

In one respect the quietly formidable Coutinho has been as good as her word. The government has postponed by ten years (to 2035) the deadline after which households will be forbidden to install any new gas boilers. And last month Coutinho delayed, though only by a year, a policy of fining manufacturers for missing targets for the installation of heat pumps.

But in another respect there is a gaping chasm between the government’s rhetoric about the primacy of consumer choice “on the road to net zero” and its actual policies. This concerns the product most beloved of British consumers and on which they — we — have the strongest opinions. I refer, of course, to the car.

Although Rishi Sunak, in September, moved from 2030 to 2035 the date by which all manufacturers would be required to stop selling any new vehicles that were not purely electric, the elaborate system of penalties remained fully in place. So, this year, manufacturers are obliged to ensure that at least 22 per cent of their sales are of EVs, and for each and every non-electric car sold that breaches the target, they are liable to a fine of £15,000. The thing ratchets up every year, so that by 2030 their sales must be at least 80 per cent EVs (not even hybrids qualify), or else …

When it became clear Sunak would postpone the 2030 deadline (one of Boris Johnson’s vainglorious attempts to demonstrate Britain’s leadership in the “battle against climate change”), a number of manufacturers upbraided the PM. Ford UK’s chief, Lisa Brankin, remonstrated: “Our business needs three things from the UK government: ambition, commitment and consistency. A relaxation of 2030 would undermine all three.”

Stellantis, which owns Vauxhall, Peugeot, Citroën and Fiat, issued a statement warning that “clarity and reasonable anticipation are important”.

Seven months on, the company’s horn is sounding a very different note. Ten days ago its chairman, Carlos Tavares, said the law fining companies for selling cars that did not meet the EV quota was “terrible for the UK”, and that “I’m not going to sell cars at a loss”. The reason for Mr Tavares going from volt to volte-face is clear for all to see (now). Or, as he put it, EVs were “crashing in the world of reality”.

To no sensible person’s surprise, consumers have been deterred by a combination of higher purchase prices, “range anxiety” and plummeting resale values, largely due to increasing awareness of the prohibitive costs if the battery needs replacing. The Stellantis boss now concedes that the “natural” market share for EVs in the UK is about half what he is being required to sell under the regulations, which are starting to bite (indeed, taking great munches out of his company’s profit margins).

In other words, this is exactly the sort of “forcing” of products onto the consumer that Coutinho says the government shouldn’t be doing. This is not a British problem alone. The EU has an almost identical policy, yet in Germany the European election manifesto of the centre-right Christian Democrats declared: “We want to abandon the ban on combustion engines and preserve Germany’s cutting edge combustion technology.”

As things stand, China will be the only winner. It, uniquely, is able to sell EVs more cheaply than the equivalent combustion engine models, and is about to flood European markets. The EU will soon be forced to choose between its vaunted commitment to fighting climate change and the existence of its own car manufacturing businesses.

If only it — and our own government — had listened to Akio Toyoda. In January the chairman of Toyota (grandson of its founder) told employees in a Q&A session of the company’s booming sales of hybrid vehicles, and pointed out: “Customers and the market will decide, not regulations or political power.”

This has now dawned on one of the world’s biggest car leasing companies, Hertz — and its shareholders. Last week its share price fell by a quarter as it announced a sell-off of many thousands of Teslas that it had only recently acquired, absorbing a thumping loss. And Tesla itself has just announced it will be dumping 14,000 employees, with Elon Musk firing his entire team responsible for its “supercharger network”. What we are witnessing is an imminent business catastrophe impelled by a global corporate stampede: the herd was galvanised by governments, which have yet to recognise, let alone admit, their own responsibility.

In terms of global misallocation of capital, there has been nothing like it since the dotcom bubble. As far as the UK is concerned, the obvious thing for the government to do is to live up to Claire Coutinho’s words and abandon the attempt to force consumers to buy products they don’t entirely trust, which can only end terribly for the businesses involved.

However, it is not so simple. The problem is the commitment to make the UK “net zero” by 2050, a declarative piece of legislation insouciantly passed without proper debate in the dying days of Theresa May’s tenure of office, as her “legacy”. It means any successor government is liable to legal challenge if it makes decisions that can be construed as breaching that commitment.

[…]

Via https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2024/05/07/the-electric-car-crash-will-rival-the-dotcom-bubble/

The Blogging Hounds

Turbo cancers are exploding among the vaccinated according to Japan’s leading oncologist who has slammed the mainstream media and Big Pharma in the West for covering up the extent of the medical crisis engulfing the world.

Prof. Emeritus Dr. Masanori Fukushima was ordered by the Japanese government to investigate why excess deaths skyrocketed in Japan in recent years.

His findings were conclusive: mRNA has destroyed immune systems and opened a Pandora’s box of autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, and infections.

The Professor has a dire warning for those in the West – do not listen to mainstream media and Big Pharma as they are not engaged in science, but rather a eugenics experiment, and they have proven themselves to be enemies of the people.

Excess deaths in Japan soared by an enormous 400% since Pfizer’s third-dose “booster shot” was rolled out in 2021, according to the data. Excess deaths were approximately four times the number of those in the years 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2021.

While the US and European governments chose to turn a blind eye to similar statistics in their countries, these numbers rocked the establishment in Japan. Official investigations were launched and lawsuits were readied.

Meet Prof. Fukushima, the most senior oncologist in Japan, who is staggered and appalled at the way the mainstream media and medical industry in the West is conspiring to cover up the explosion of turbo cancer caused by mRNA.

Japanese scientists and researchers have been at the forefront of investigating the Covid pandemic from outside the control of Big Pharma.

The findings of their studies have pulled the rug on the globalists who are determined to continue deceiving the masses.

Unlike in the US and Europe where Big Pharma rules supreme, Japan does not kow-tow to the global pharmaceutical cartels. Advertising vaccines on TV is illegal. Japan is one of the most developed countries in the world and yet the people remain interested in traditional medicine and natural cures.

Why? Ask a Japanese person and they will tell you its simple. Traditional and nature cures work.

They understand that the Rockefeller dynasty corrupted the US medical industry, hijacking and monopolizing the business until it resembled a Mexican drug cartel pushing poison on the population.

They began to investigate the cause of these sudden deaths and health problems.

And, lo and behold, they found that the cause of the carnage was the vaccines.

Concrete steps are being taken to protect the population from further damage, including the proposal to ban vaccinated people from donating tainted blood.

Most interesting of all, Prof. Fukushima’s findings regarding turbo cancer match exactly the conclusions drawn by Dr. Peter McCullough who sounded the alarm about three mechanisms by which Covid vaccines can start a new cancer or fast-track an existing tumor.

Dr. McCullough is at the forefront of the investigations in the US into excess deaths and turbo cancer caused by the Covid mRNA vaccine roll out.

While the Japanese have acknowledged the explosion in cancer and confirmed that mRNA is the cause, here in the West we are still battling against the Big Pharma cartel and their grip on the mainstream media.

It’s a completely ridiculous state of affairs, but the officials and the media are still denying turbo cancer exists.

They are asking us to disbelieve what we can see with our own eyes.

That’s why it is so important to listen to Dr. McCullough’s concise explanation of vaccine-induced turbo cancer and educate anybody who has yet to wake up to the truth.

Turbo cancer is another case of yesterday’s conspiracy theories becoming today’s facts.

The Japanese have confirmed what we knew all along. Biden, Fauci and Gates were sharing medical misinformation with us.

There was no “winter of severe illness and death” for the unvaccinated. In reality, this is a pandemic of the vaccinated.

Unfortunately for those who submitted to the jabs, the time of severe illness and death has only just begun.

[…]

Via https://theblogginghounds.com/2024/05/07/japan-to-ban-mrna-as-turbo-cancers-among-vaxxed-skyrocket/

The Blogging Hounds

A Texan farm worker has contracted bird flu from an infected cow, marking the first time the HSN1 virus has been recorded spreading from mammals to humans, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Incredibly, in what the media is claiming is a “coincidence”, a Bill Gates-funded bird flu vaccine for that strain has just entered trials. New images show the dairy farmer with bloodshot eyes after he was the first case to catch bird flu from a mammal – in this case an infected cow – as the WHO claimed this is a “milestone” of “enormous concern.” In a report published Friday, the CDC said that they found “strong evidence” through genetic data that the farmer caught bird flu from a cow in March.

This revelation shows the first sign of HSN1 virus spreading from mammals to humans just weeks after Bill Gates admitted he had a new vaccine prepared for global roll out. The images of the patient, plus further details about his unprecedented case, were published in a report in the New England Journal of Medicine. According to the experts, the patient developed a subconjunctival haemorrhage, or bleeding just beneath the conjunctiva, the clear surface covering the white part of the eye. He patient is also suffering a watery liquid discharged from his right eye.

The Mirror reports the dairy farmer is now the second person to be diagnosed with bird flu in the USA, and perhaps the first to have caught it from a mammal – in this case, a cow. So far, nearly 900 people in 23 countries have been infected with the H5N1 strain of avian flu over the last 20 years. However, they were all linked to wild or kept birds. The dairy farmer’s case comes as experts warn that they are hearing of other farmers falling ill, but not getting tested for HSN1 virus.

The Texas patient came to doctors with the infection in late March, with scientists saying his vital signs — such as breathing — were normal. He also had no signs of fever, changes in breathing or vision during the infection. After being treated with anti-virals, the patient reported no symptoms except for some “discomfort in both eyes.”

The report added: “Over the subsequent days, the worker reported resolution of conjunctivitis without respiratory symptoms and household contacts remained well.” CDC Director Dr Mandy Cohen said that the patient’s condition was “very mild.” She told NPR : “The person had very mild symptoms. They’re recovering well. But we want to make sure, again, that we are testing folks who may have been in contact.”

[…]

Via https://theblogginghounds.com/2024/05/06/h5n1-bird-flu-makes-historic-jump-from-mammals-to-humans-shortly-after-bill-gates-unveiled-new-vaccine/

Stephen Bryen 

France has sent its first troops officially to Ukraine. They have been deployed in support of the Ukrainian 54th Independent Mechanized Brigade in Slavyansk. The French soldiers are drawn from France’s 3rd Infantry Regiment, which is one of the main elements of France’s Foreign Legion (Légion étrangère).

In 2022 France had a number of Ukrainians and Russians in the Foreign Legion. They were allowed to leave the Legion and, in the case of the Ukrainians, return to Ukraine to join Ukrainian forces. It isn’t clear if the Russians returned home.

The Legion today is run by French officers but the rank and file are all foreigners. Under the curren anonymat (being anonymous) a volunteer who joins the Legion can decide whether to keep his given name or adopt a new one. Legionnaires serve for three year terms, after which they can ask for French citizenship. If a legionnaire is wounded, he is entitled to gain French citizenship without any waiting period. There are no women in the Foreign Legion.

The initial group of French troops numbers around 100. This is just the first tranche of around 1,500 French Foreign Legion soldiers scheduled to arrive in Ukraine.

These troops are being posted directly in a hot combat area and are intended to help the Ukrainians resist Russian advances in Donbas. The first 100 are artillery and surveillance specialists.

For months French President Emanuel Macron has been threatening to send French troops to Ukraine. He has found little or no support from NATO countries outside of support from Poland and the Baltic States. Allegedly the US opposes sending NATO soldiers to Ukraine (other than as advisors).

One of the questions to immediately arise from France’s decision to send soldiers from its 3rd Infantry Regiment is whether this crosses the Russian red line on NATO involvement in Ukraine? Will the Russians see this as initiating a wider war beyond Ukraine’s borders?

France itself does not have many troops to put on Ukraine’s battlelines, should the French government want to do so. According to reports, today France cannot support an overseas deployment of a full division and won’t have this capability until 2027 at the earliest.

The decision to send Foreign Legionnaires is, itself, a peculiar French compromise. France is not deploying its home army and, besides the small number of officers, the men sent are not French citizens.

France’s decision has two meanings, beyond the obvious one of potentially triggering a pan-European war.

First of all, it allows Macron to send troops to Ukraine and act like a tough guy without encountering much home opposition. That’s because no French army soldiers are being sent and there is no consequent conscription or other measures in the offing. This clearly reduces the potential fury of Macron’s political opponents.

The second reason is Macron’s anger at seeing French troops, almost all from the Legion, getting kicked out of Sahelian Africa and replaced by Russians. Control of Francophone Africa, and the riches it provides to French politicians, has been broken by the revolt and revolution in Africa and a decisive tilt to Russia – either directly or through PMC Wagner (the Wagner Group). now clearly under Vladimir Putin’s direct control.

This “humiliation” is felt in the Élysée Palace and particularly by Macron who, his opponents say, has lost France’s influence and harmed France’s overseas mining and business interests.

A particular blow is in Niger, an important supplier of uranium to France. France gets 70 percent of its electrical power from nuclear power generators. Global uranium supplies are tightening and prices rising. With Russia and Kazakhstan, along with Niger, on the top of the heap in terms of supplying uranium for nuclear reactors, France has a home economic security problem. The US decision to ban Russian uranium (but probably not realistically, in the next few years) the Russians could deal a serious blow to France and the United States by cutting off supplies.

Given the risk of losing access to uranium, or at least enough of it to supply France’s reactors, Macron has to hope that his troop deployments to Ukraine won’t trigger a Russian embargo on sales to France.

It isn’t clear how the Legionnaires can help the Ukrainians. The Ukrainians know how to operate artillery, and they have sophisticated intelligence support, some of it generated by their own FPV drones and spies and some of it thanks to US and other NATO intelligence and surveillance assets supporting Ukraine.

Anyway, the Ukrainian issue is not about how to use artillery but where the ammunition is supposed to come from. Ukraine continues to complain it lacks adequate supplies for 155mm howitzers.

The decision to put the Legion soldiers in Slavyansk is extremely provocative and goes against statements from the French side, including Macron, to the effect that if France sent troops they would replace Ukrainian army units in western Ukraine who could, therefore, be moved eastward to fight the Russians. As Slavyansk is on the front line, this French image of a soft deployment is turning into a war with Russia directly.

A key question is how NATO will react to the French decision to deploy. As France is acting on its own without NATO’s backing, the French cannot claim support from NATO under its famous Article 5, the collective security component of the NATO Treaty.

[…]

Via https://asiatimes.com/2024/05/france-sends-combat-troops-to-ukraine-battlefront/

Dr Eddy Betterman

Buried beneath headlines about congressional treason and wars and rumors of war is a disturbing new report from the World Entomology Body (WEB) showing that the world’s insect populations are plummeting.

This is really bad news for the food supply, which relies on precious pollinators like bees to keep the life cycle going. Without these vital critters, there will be no more food available for anyone, including the rich and sinister who think they are going to somehow escape the horrors they are unleashing.

There are many reasons why insect biodiversity is crumbling to dust, including fragmentation and loss of habitat; pollution from LED lighting, microplastics and synthetic pesticides; the growing spread of viral “super” pathogens and parasites; and a changing climate.

“These significant declines in populations of managed and native bees and other pollinators are destroying production agriculture,” says Ken Chandler, a director of agricultural studies at a school in Iowa.

Chandler would add that with the way things are going, there are going to be billions of dollars in economic losses just in 2024 alone.

“Our ability to grow food is no longer a given,” he said somberly.

(Related: Did you know that early last year, the United States government approved the world’s first ‘vaccine” for honeybees?)

Restoring insect biodiversity wouldn’t be that hard

Plants and pollinators maintain a mutually exclusive relationship. One cannot exist without the other, which means if the bugs go, so do all the flowers and everything else that grows.

“Flowers burst onto the scene in northern climes during the spring and summer. Their color, smell and nectar attract pollinators to land then carry pollen with them, flower to flower,” explains Clean Technica. “Essential for plants, these pollinators create the process for the crops that humans eat.”

“Pollination occurs when the deposit of pollen grains from the anther (male structure) onto the pistil (female structure) of the same plant species takes place. Pollen is full of genetic information needed to fertilize a plant. Successful pollination results in the production of viable seeds and a fruit to protect them.”

The above is basic grade-school science, but it is worth repeating for those who may have forgotten how things work. Understanding the intricacies of nature at a basic level is where this all has to start, that way people understand what is at stake if the destruction does not stop.

The U.S. alone grows more than 100 staple food crops that only grow if pollinated by insects and fertilized by animals. A few examples include almonds, apples, pears, citrus fruits, cherries, pumpkins, cucumbers, blackberries, cranberries, raspberries, strawberries, blueberries, melons, tomatoes, soybeans and sunflowers.

All of these foods will be gone unless insect biodiversity can be somehow improved, or at least set on a positive trajectory. Right now, it would seem as though all hope is already lost and that it is just a matter of time before mass famine and starvation strikes.

Calls to protect insects in this country really started reaching a fever pitch back in the 1960s, but by that point the globalists had already gained a foothold in converting agriculture into a commercial endeavor to enrich themselves at our expense. Soon, they too will suffer the consequences of their error in the form of hunger and death.

A recent study on all this found that restoring insect biodiversity is not an impossibility. There exist many “simple and relatively inexpensive practices for pollinator conservation,” but the problem is that almost none of these are being utilized because they are bad for business as far as the globalists are concerned.

[…]

Via https://dreddymd.com/2024/05/06/insect-biodiversity-plummeting-global-food-supply-collapse/

Queen Hatshepsut

Episode 16 Queen Hatshepsut

The History of Ancient Egypt

Professor Robert Brier

Film Review

Queen Hatshepsut ruled Egypt from 1479-58 BC. For the first six years, she ruled as regent of her son Tuthmosis III. At that point she declared herself “king” and ruled in her own right. A legitimate daughter of king Tuthmosis I and his chief wife, at age 12 she married her half-brother by a lesser wife. Marrying into the royal family qualified him to assume the throne a Tuthmosisis II.

After ruling 20 years, he died, leaving the throne to his six-year-old son Tuthmosis III. Ruling as his regent, Hatshepsut declined to step down when he came of age.

From inscriptions on the walls of her spectacular mortuary temple at in Deir-el Bahari (near the Valley of the Kings), we know she started wearing a false beard to designate herself as pharaoh, as well as sending a trading expedition to Punt (Eritrea) to bring back giraffes,* ivory and frankincense and myrrh trees in baskets. This would be the first portrayal in history of Sub-Saharan  Africa. The inscriptions depict image of both the queen of Punt and her daughter (who had elephantiasis), as well as houses on stilts with thatched roofs. There’s also an inscription regarding Hatshepsut’s birth, occurring after the god Amun visits her mother to impregnate her.**

Hatshepsut also built four obelisks at the Karnak temple east of Thebes made of granite quarried in Aswan.

She is buried in the same tomb as her father in the Valley of the Kings. Obscene graffiti workmen left on the wall of her tomb suggest she was lovers with Senmat, a bachelor to whom awarded numerous titles: royal tutor (of Hatshepsut’s daughter), overseer of the royal palace, overseer of the granaries of Amun and overseer of public works.

Her son, who took the throne in 1458 BC following her death, omitted her name from most kings lists, replacing it with that of Tuthmosis I, II or III.

*Queen Hatshepsut would start the world’s first zoo.

**According to legend, Knu (the ramheaded god) created pharaohs and  their ka (spirit) on a potters wheel, which is how they became divine.

Film can be viewed free with a library card on Kanopy.

https://www.kanopy.com/en/pukeariki/watch/video/1492791/1492828

Debbie Lerman

Donald Trump will likely become the Republican Presidential nominee in 2024, without ever having to answer any questions about his administration’s disastrous pandemic response.

If there were any accountability, and any real journalists insisting on it, these would be some of the questions Trump would have to answer:

Should you have stuck with a public health response?

• Before Covid, your Presidency was going pretty well. You had a good shot at winning another term. Would you agree that the pandemic pretty much reversed that?

• Actually, it wasn’t just the pandemic. It was your administration’s response to the pandemic. The Democrats won by claiming you had botched the whole thing. They said hundreds of thousands of people died because you did not lock down soon enough and refused to wear a mask. They said the US should have behaved more like China than like Sweden. Do you agree?

• A lot of Republicans now think you should have run the pandemic more like DeSantis did in Florida (even though they might not have said it at the time). It seems that before March 10th, 2020, you were planning to run it that way. And you were listening to your public health advisors from the CDC and NIH. Is that correct?

Why did you agree to spend trillions of dollars to keep everything shut down?

• It was shocking when you seemed to pivot 180 degrees in just a few days, from saying that it would not be worse than a bad flu season, to announcing that we would throw everything we had at it, locking down the whole country — a devastating step that had never been taken before, for any reason, including war. It was especially surprising that you agreed to the economic shutdown. What made you change your mind?

Should you have allowed the security state to take over?

• A lot of information has come out suggesting that you changed your mind because your National Security Council, and related military and intelligence leaders, told you the virus was a potential bioweapon that leaked from a Chinese lab. Is that what you were told? Did they tell you millions of people would die and you would be responsible, if you didn’t follow their plan?

• In a Time Magazine article you were quoted saying “I can’t tell you that” when you were asked about why you thought the virus came from a lab in Wuhan. You said “I’m not allowed to tell you that.” Who was not allowing you to speak openly about the possibility that it was a lab leak? Can you speak openly about it now?

• Who made the decision in the middle of March 2020 to invoke the Stafford Act in all 50 states at the same time (which had never been done before), and to put FEMA in charge as the Lead Federal Agency for pandemic response, when FEMA had no warning and no experience in this area at all? Who decided to remove HHS from the role of Lead Federal Agency, which it was supposed to have according to every public health pandemic planning document before Covid? Did you make those decisions or did the NSC or other military or intelligence advisors tell you to take those steps?

Who was actually in charge?

• When you brought Scott Atlas in, he advised you to open the country back up immediately. It seems like you really wanted someone in the White House with an opinion that was different from the one you were hearing in favor of lockdowns.But, for some reason, there was enormous resistance to bringing any experts in. There was even supposed to be a meeting at the end of March (long before Atlas arrived) with top epidemiologists that mysteriously got canceled. Why did you have so little control over who advised you about the pandemic? Why didn’t you follow the advice of Scott Atlas if, as he reported in his book, you pretty much agreed with him that the lockdowns were disastrous?

• Most people think Fauci was in charge of the pandemic response. But in his book, Dr. Atlas reports that you said the main problem wasn’t Fauci, it was Deborah Birx. Is that because Birx was in charge of coordinating the NSC/DHS response, and Fauci was just a front to make it seem like a public health response?

• A few months into the lockdowns, you sounded as if you had lost control of the situation, like in the tweet from May 18th 2020 when you wrote in all caps: REOPEN OUR COUNTRY! You’d think if anyone could have ended the lockdowns, it would have been the President. But you seemed to feel helpless to reverse what was happening. Is that because there had been a sort of silent coup of the NSC and Department and Homeland Security?

Was it a biodefense or a public health response?

• If the answers to all the previous questions are classified, that would confirm that the response to Covid involved secret machinations of national security entities, or what you often refer to as the Deep State. Can you at least confirm that much?

Did the Deep State effectively stage a coup against your administration?

• You recently said: “Either the Deep State Destroys American, or we destroy the Deep State.” Are you mad at all career bureaucrats, or frustrated because the National Security Council, DHS and DoD seized control of the Covid response and you feel they did not behave in the best interests of all Americans?Here’s my guess as to what the Deep State told you about Covid:

“We, your biowarfare and bioterrorism experts, are hereby informing you that the novel coronavirus is a potential bioweapon that unfortunately leaked from a bioweapons lab into the civilian population in China. It sounds bad, but luckily we’ve spent many years planning for just such an eventuality. If you don’t do what we say, millions will die and you will be blamed. If you follow our plan, you might very well become the President who takes credit for a scientific miracle that will rid the world of pandemics forever.”

Is this a fair representation of what you were told?

Did you participate in censorship and propaganda?

• Were you aware of the massive censorship and propaganda that were happening to make people accept the lockdowns and vaccines? Do you feel like you were part of that campaign to convince people? Or do you feel like you were somehow forced to participate in it?
• On March 7, 2020, Tucker Carlson came to warn you that “someone who works in the U.S. government, a nonpolitical person with access to a lot of intelligence” told him the virus would kill millions of people if you didn’t lock down immediately and wait for vaccines. Do you know who warned Tucker and, most likely, urged him to warn you?

Did you engage in international coordination of the response?

• Were you in touch with leaders of other allied countries to coordinate the response to the pandemic? It’s pretty astonishing how all our closest allies ended up doing exactly the same thing at the same time. If you were not the one who was coordinating with foreign leaders, were you aware of that type of coordination going on – especially with the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Israel, Germany, and other NATO allies?

What’s your position on the mRNA injections?

• Were you told by your biodefense team that mRNA technology was a miraculous platform that would end the threat of pandemics, among other amazing accomplishments?
• You have repeatedly expressed great pride in the “success” of Operation Warp Speed, which produced mRNA shots that were supposed to prevent Covid infection (as stated explicitly in the contracts signed by the DoD and the pharma companies under your administration). The injections were actually administered only once Biden became President, so one could argue that he was responsible for whatever happened after that.

  

• Would you agree that the Covid mRNA vaccines failed to accomplish what they were supposed to?
• When it became obvious that they prevented neither infection nor transmission, and when evidence emerged of extensive harm from side effects, including death — did you change your mind?

And, of course, the most important question of all: If faced with a similar crisis, would you do the same thing again?

[…]

Via https://debbielerman.substack.com/p/questions-for-trump-about-covid