Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has surged in children in recent years, even among those who are just 4 years old. According to data from the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) Network, the overall prevalence of ASD in 2020 was 21.5 per 1,000 children aged 4.1 This marks a 26% increase from 2018, when the prevalence was 17 per 1,000.
The numbers are not uniform across all regions, with California reporting the highest rate at 46.4 per 1,000, while Utah saw the lowest at 12.7 per 1,000. Stark gender and racial disparities also exist in ASD diagnoses.
Boys are diagnosed with autism more frequently than girls, with a prevalence of 32.3 per 1,000 compared to 10.4 per 1,000 for girls, whose ASD symptoms often differ from their male counterparts. Overall, however, in 2020, 1 in 30, or 3.49%, of children ages 3 to 17 were diagnosed with autism2 — that’s about 33 per 1,000 individuals.
Shifting Demographics: Autism Rates Higher in Certain Groups
Recent data reveals a significant shift in autism prevalence among different racial and ethnic groups. For the first time, the ADDM Network reported that White children aged 8 years have a lower prevalence of autism compared to their Black, Hispanic and Asian or Pacific Islander peers.3
Specifically, the prevalence was 24.3 per 1,000 among White children, while it was 29.3 among Black children, 31.6 among Hispanic children and 33.4 among Asian or Pacific Islander children.
Another compelling aspect of the latest autism statistics is the nuanced relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and autism prevalence. Unlike earlier years, where higher SES was strongly associated with increased autism diagnoses, the 2020 data shows a more complex picture.
In three out of the 11 ADDM Network sites — Arizona, New Jersey and Utah — children from lower-income households exhibited higher autism prevalence. When data from all sites were combined, there was a noticeable trend of lower autism prevalence in higher SES census tracts. However, the differences across low, medium and high SES groups were relatively modest, ranging between 23 to 27.2 per 1,000 children.
Understanding when children are diagnosed with autism is important for ensuring they receive timely interventions. The 2020 ADDM Network data provides valuable insights into the age at which children receive their first autism diagnosis. The median age of earliest known autism diagnosis was 49 months, with significant variations across states — from as early as 36 months in California to as late as 59 months in Minnesota.4
Additionally, children diagnosed with ASD who also have an intellectual disability tend to receive their diagnoses earlier, with a median age of 43 months compared to 53 months for those without an intellectual disability.
The Economic Burden of Autism
Research estimates that each individual with autism incurs a lifetime social cost of approximately $3.6 million.5 When you consider the entire population of individuals diagnosed with autism from 1990 to 2019, the total social costs in the U.S. have surpassed a staggering $7 trillion. This figure is equivalent to about two years of total federal revenue, highlighting the immense economic impact of autism.
A different model takes into account the actual rise in autism diagnoses over time, revealing another staggering figure.6 It looks at different age groups, inflation and future predictions of autism rates to forecast costs. According to this model, the annual cost of autism in the U.S. was around $223 billion in 2020.
This cost is expected to jump to about $589 billion by 2030, reach $1.36 trillion by 2040, and could hit between $4.29 and $6.78 trillion — estimated to be $5.54 trillion — by 2060.7
Looking ahead, the financial strain of autism may escalate even more dramatically. If the prevalence of autism remains constant over the next decade, a study published in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders found the lifetime social costs in the U.S. are projected to increase to $11.5 trillion by 2029.8
However, if the current trend of rising prevalence continues, these costs could soar to nearly $15 trillion within the same period. This projection represents an unprecedented economic challenge on top of the public health ramifications.
Unveiling the Biological Underpinnings of Autism
Intricate biological mechanisms contribute to autism. A study published in Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, for instance, explored the role of lipid metabolism, specifically focusing on arachidonic acid-derived dihydroxy fatty acids (diHETrE) in neonatal cord blood.9 diHETrE is a metabolite of arachidonic acid (derived from linoleic acid (LA)).
The study found that higher levels of certain diHETrE metabolites are significantly associated with increased severity of autism symptoms and impairments in social adaptive functioning at age 6.
These findings suggest that the metabolic processes involving polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) during the fetal period play a role in the developmental trajectory of children with autism. In short, PUFAs like linoleic acid are precursors to proinflammatory metabolites like diHETrE, which the Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences study associates with increased autism symptom severity.10
LA is abundant in modern diets, particularly in processed, restaurant and fast foods, leading to higher consumption levels compared to historical norms. The metabolism of LA through the cytochrome P450 (CYP) pathway produces diHETrE metabolites, raising concerns about the widespread availability and consumption of LA in contemporary diets.
Re-evaluating the sources of fats in your diet, opting for healthier alternatives like saturated fats, is an important choice to protect brain health, including during pregnancy. Reducing linoleic acid consumption might not only help lower the inflammatory markers associated with autism but also promote overall brain health and development.
Your Infant’s Gut Microbiome and Autism Risk
The foundation of your child’s neurological development might, in fact, be set within the first year of life. Recent research tracking 16,440 Swedish children for two decades uncovered a significant link between the gut microbiome of infants and the later development of autism.11
The study found that certain beneficial bacteria, such as Akkermansia muciniphila and Coprococcus, were notably less abundant in infants who later received an autism diagnosis. These bacteria play a role in maintaining gut barrier integrity and modulating the immune system, which are essential for healthy brain development.
A child’s early years are a key period for gut health, and common childhood infections and antibiotic treatments might have long-lasting effects on their microbiome and neurodevelopment. The study revealed that frequent infections, particularly ear infections (otitis), and repeated antibiotic use during infancy were strongly associated with a higher likelihood of developing autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders.12
Antibiotics disrupt the delicate balance of gut bacteria, reducing beneficial microbes like Coprococcus and increasing harmful ones like Citrobacter. This imbalance, or dysbiosis, leads to immune dysregulation and inflammation, which are linked to impaired brain development and function.
Beyond the microbial landscape, the study uncovered significant metabolic differences in infants who later developed autism. Higher concentrations of environmental toxins such as perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) “forever chemicals” in cord serum were strongly linked to autism risk. PFDA disrupts immune responses and promotes chronic inflammation, further impacting brain health.
Additionally, metabolomic profiles in stool samples revealed disruptions in amino acids and vitamins crucial for neurotransmitter synthesis and antioxidant defense. It’s rarely just one factor that triggers a neurodevelopmental disorder or other chronic disease. Typically, it’s a combination of factors — like processed food loaded with LA, childhood vaccines, antibiotic overuse and environmental pollutants — that causes gut dysfunction and other imbalances in the body.
Understanding EMFs and Their Impact on Brain Health
Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) have been likened to the cigarettes of the modern era, with the majority of individuals exposed to them around the clock. Key sources of this pervasive radiation include cellphones, cell towers, computers, smart meters and Wi-Fi devices, among others.
Exposure to EMFs is linked to significant mitochondrial dysfunction caused by free radical damage. Chronic exposure to EMFs leads to serious brain-related conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease, anxiety, depression and autism.13
A study published in Pathophysiology indicates that autism may be connected to biological disruptions similar to those caused by EMF and radiofrequency exposures.14 Additionally, Dr. Martin Pall discovered a novel mechanism of harm from microwaves emitted by cellphones and other wireless technologies. This harm occurs through voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) located in your cell membranes.15
VGCCs are highly concentrated in the brain, and animal studies have demonstrated that even low levels of microwave EMFs produce significant and diverse effects on brain function. When EMFs activate these VGCCs, it results in a variety of neuropsychiatric issues.
To date, at least 26 studies have associated EMFs with neuropsychiatric effects, and five specific criteria have been established to confirm a causal relationship, indicating that EMFs can indeed cause these adverse effects.16
In another study, published in Brain Sciences, Pall highlights how VGCCs in your body’s cells lead to excessive intracellular calcium levels.17 This calcium overload disrupts processes involved in brain development, particularly during the perinatal period when synaptogenesis — the formation of synapses — is at its peak.
Synaptogenesis is essential for establishing the intricate networks that underlie social interactions, communication and behavior. When EMFs interfere with this process by overactivating VGCCs, it leads to the synaptic dysfunctions observed in autism spectrum disorders.
Compelling Evidence — How EMFs Contribute to Autism
The evidence linking EMF exposure to autism is both extensive and compelling. Genetic studies have shown that mutations increasing VGCC activity are directly associated with higher autism rates, underscoring the significance of calcium regulation in autism causation.18
Animal studies further reinforce this connection, where prenatal EMF exposure in rodents led to autism-like behaviors and significant changes in brain structure and function. For instance, rats exposed to EMFs exhibited impaired social interactions and elevated oxidative stress, mirroring the biochemical and behavioral traits seen in human autism patients.19
Additionally, epidemiological research, though limited, has identified correlations between high-EMF environments — such as areas near military radar stations or where pregnant women had elevated EMF exposures — and increased autism prevalence.20 These findings collectively suggest that EMFs are not just a coincidental factor but a driver of the autism epidemic.
While completely avoiding EMF exposure is nearly impossible, there are practical methods to minimize it. Given the constant barrage of EMFs in daily life, educating yourself about their negative impacts is imperative for your health. This is especially important if you are managing a serious illness or a neurodevelopmental disorder like autism. Taking steps to reduce your EMF exposure will significantly benefit your well-being.
One effective strategy is to connect your desktop computer to the internet using a wired connection and activate airplane mode on both your desktop and cellphone. Additionally, steer clear of wireless peripherals such as keyboards, trackballs, mice, game systems, printers and landline phones. Instead, opt for their wired counterparts.
If you need to use Wi-Fi, remember to turn it off when it’s not in use, particularly at night while you sleep. Turning off the electricity in your bedroom during nighttime also helps decrease your overall EMF exposure.
Taking Action for a Healthier Future
The rising prevalence of autism, coupled with the significant economic and emotional burdens it imposes, underscores the urgency of addressing the root causes of this condition. Prioritizing gut health through a balanced diet rich in beneficial bacteria and minimizing exposure to harmful substances like EMFs and excessive linoleic acid, are necessary first steps.
Moreover, understanding the profound impact of environmental factors and genetic predispositions empowers you to create a safer, more supportive environment. Simple changes, such as opting for wired connections over wireless devices and choosing healthier fat sources, may significantly reduce the risk of developing neurodevelopmental disorders.
Additionally, advocating for cleaner environments and supporting policies that limit harmful exposures contribute to broader societal changes that benefit all children. Remember, early intervention and informed choices are your best tools in combating the rising tide of autism. By staying informed, making conscious lifestyle adjustments and fostering a nurturing environment, you take steps toward ensuring a healthier, brighter future for children.
[ED This article omits any mention of research linking the aluminum adjuvants in childhood vaccines to gut inflammation and an increasing prevalence of ADHD, autism, allergies, ear infections and autoimmune disease in vaccinated children. This research is still in its infancy but parents need to be aware it exists. See https://www.oatext.com/pdf/JTS-7-459.pdf ]
[…]
Via https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2024/12/19/autism-statistics.aspx
Zero Hedge
Signs that we were once a truly great nation are all around us. Previous generations of Americans handed us the keys to the most magnificent domestic infrastructure that the world had ever seen, but now it is literally falling apart all around us. Thousands of bridges are structurally deficient and there have already been some very high profile collapses. Hundreds of thousands of miles of highways and roads in the United States are in very poor shape. Aging sewer systems are leaking raw sewage all over the place, and children are being slowly poisoned by lead pipes that desperately need to be replaced. The power grid is hopelessly overloaded and is extremely vulnerable. Meanwhile, our ports, our dams, our subway systems, our bus terminals and our airports are crumbling right in front of our eyes. The truth is that our nation’s infrastructure says a lot about who we are.
So what does America’s crumbling infrastructure say about us? Sadly, it says that we are a rusting, crumbling, decaying leftover from a better, more prosperous time.
When Joe Biden took office in 2021, his administration told us that “investment in U.S. infrastructure as a share of GDP has fallen by more than 40 percent since the 1960s”…
Public investment in U.S. infrastructure as a share of GDP has fallen by more than 40 percent since the 1960s. The World Economic Forum now ranks the United States 13th when it comes to the overall quality of infrastructure.
So Congress passed a bill that gave the Biden administration more than $100,000,000,000 to spend on fixing our infrastructure.
Honestly, I have no idea what they did with all that money.
In 2021, the official White House website was reporting that 45,000 bridges and 20 percent of our roads were in poor condition…
More than 45,000 U.S. bridges and 1 in 5 miles of roads are in poor condition, per the American Society of Civil Engineers. In 2007, the I-35 bridge over the Mississippi River in Minneapolis collapsed during rush hour, killing 13 and injuring 121.
Well, fast forward a few years later and the Department of Transportation is still telling us that “over 40,000 bridges” are in poor condition…
The Department of Transportation considers 6.8% of the over 600,000 bridges it tracks and rates to be in “poor” condition. That doesn’t sound too bad on a percentage basis, but it’s over 40,000 bridges in total.
And it appears that the condition of our roads has actually gotten worse in many states.
For example, Consumer Reports says that almost half of all urban roads in the state of California are not currently in acceptable condition…
Despite an enormous yearly disbursement for highways that tops $21 billion, the Golden State manages to keep just a little more than half their urban roads in acceptable condition. However, this is an outsized job since, in addition to 840 miles of coastline, California boasts more miles of urban roads than any other state and has the second-highest mileage of rural roads in the country.
Data from the National Highway Administration shows California’s roads are the most traveled in the U.S., so it makes sense that the state also has the second-highest number of motor vehicle-related fatalities in the country.
Back in 2021, the Biden administration also made a big deal out of the fact that millions of Americans were getting their tap water through lead pipes…
Millions still get water from lead pipes, despite the fact that exposure to lead has irreversible health effects; in 2015, a state of emergency was declared in Flint, Michigan as citizens learned that their water supply contained toxic levels of lead.
So why didn’t the Biden administration fix this problem?
An article that was published late last year revealed that the EPA is estimating that “more than 9 million service lines” are still made out of lead…
The EPA estimates that more than 9 million service lines are made of lead, a neurotoxin that can cause nervous system damage, learning disabilities and other health problems, especially in children. If lead pipes corrode, as in the infamous case of Flint, Michigan, they can poison drinking water.
While no amount of lead exposure is safe, the federal rule now requires utilities to notify the public and improve corrosion treatment if lead in their water exceeds 10 parts per billion. Some homes in Syracuse, New York, recently tested at 70 parts per billion.
Our politicians are constantly telling us that they just don’t have enough money to get everything done.
Personally, I would really love to see exactly what the Biden administration spent more than 100 billion dollars of infrastructure money on.
Have you traveled through any of our airports lately?
Compared to other industrialized nations, they are a complete and utter joke.
Why can’t we have beautiful airports, modern subway systems, functional roads and bridges, and safe water coming out of our taps?
More tax revenue is collected in America than anywhere else in the world, and so we certainly deserve the best infrastructure.
When I bring up the topic of taxes, most people immediately think of the federal income tax. But the truth is that there are literally dozens of different taxes that they use to extract wealth out of us…
- Building Permit Tax
- Capital Gains Tax
- CDL License Tax
- Cigarette Tax
- Corporate Income Tax
- Court Fines (indirect taxes)
- Dog License Tax
- Federal Income Tax
- Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
- Fishing License Tax
- Food License Tax
- Fuel Permit Tax
- Gasoline Tax
- Gift Tax
- Hunting License Tax
- Inheritance Tax
- IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)
- Liquor Tax
- Local Income Tax
- Luxury Taxes
- Marriage License Tax
- Medicare Tax
- Payroll Taxes
- Property Tax
- Real Estate Tax
- Recreational Vehicle Tax
- Road Toll Booth Taxes
- Road Usage Taxes (Truckers)
- Sales Taxes
- School Tax
- Septic Permit Tax
- Service Charge Taxes
- Social Security Tax
- State Income Tax
- State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)
- Telephone federal excise tax
- Telephone federal universal service fee tax
- Telephone federal, state and local surcharge taxes
- Telephone minimum usage surcharge tax
- Telephone recurring and non-recurring charges tax
- Telephone state and local tax
- Telephone usage charge tax
- Toll Bridge Taxes
- Toll Tunnel Taxes
- Traffic Fines (indirect taxation)
- Trailer Registration Tax
- Utility Taxes
- Vehicle License Registration Tax
- Vehicle Sales Tax
- Watercraft Registration Tax
- Well Permit Tax
- Workers Compensation Tax
When you take all forms of taxation into account, some Americans actually end up handing over more than 50 percent of their incomes each year.
So our politicians have no excuse for not fixing our infrastructure.
But even though they extract money from us in dozens of different ways, our infrastructure crisis just seems to keep getting worse.
In some areas of the country, roads that were once paved have actually been transformed into gravel roads because they are cheaper to maintain.
[…]
Via https://www.zerohedge.com/political/truth-about-americas-crumbling-infrastructure

Paul Craig Roberts
Divisions are already appearing in MAGA ranks. President-elect Trump and Elon Musk have aligned with the H-1B work visas that allow foreigners to be brought in to fill American jobs. This disappoints the Trump working class that believed making America great again meant they were going to get their jobs back.
American corporations, universities, and non-profit organizations like H-1B work visas for a variety of reasons. A H-1B visa recipient is an indentured servant. He or she is paid substantially less but cannot leave the employer for higher pay as the visa is tied to the specific employer. This also has the result of denying the indentured servant employment or protest rights as the indentured servant’s presence in the US is tied to the visa that is tied to the employer. For example, a H-1B visa holder cannot file a discrimination complaint.
As Senator Bernie Sanders puts it:
“The main function of the H-1B visa program is not to hire ‘the best and the brightest,’ but rather to replace good-paying American jobs with low-wage indentured servants from abroad. The cheaper the labor they hire, the more money the billionaires make.” https://www.rt.com/news/610400-bernie-sanders-elon-musk-visas/
The case for H-1B visas is fraudulent. The claim is that America’s huge numbers of universities are incapable of producing enough American graduates to meet America’s need for “highly educated individuals with skills critical to our country’s economic future,” to use the words of Todd Schulte, president of an immigrant advocacy organization with ties to big tech. Or as Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas disguised the scam, “American businesses rely on the H-1B visa program for the recruitment of highly-skilled talent, benefitting communities across the country.”
Imagine, the United States relies on the Third World, not on its many world prestigious universities, to supply its need for “highly-skilled talent.” The communities are not benefitting. The American residents are losing the jobs. Wages and salaries are being paid to foreigners who have displaced Americans. The difference between the US wage and the H-1B wage goes to corporate profits and executive “performance bonuses.”
[…]
It is a fairy tale told by shills to enhance corporate profits and executive bonuses that Harvard, Princeton, Yale, Cornell, Columbia, University of Pennsylvania, MIT, Cal Tech, Georgia Tech, University of California, University of Chicago, and the large numbers of private and state universities cannot turn out enough educated people to fill the economy’s needs.
If Americans are not studying for careers in high tech it is because they know the jobs will be given to foreigners on visas. Moreover, Americans who prepare for these careers are hit again by the offshoring of many of the jobs.
During the early years of the 21st century when the “skills shortage” was being concocted to serve corporate profits, Business Week reported a 12.7% decline in computer science pay, a 12%decline in computer engineering pay, a 10.2% decline in electrical engineering pay. Professor Norm Matloff at the University of California, Davis, found that between 2001 and 2005 starting pay for master degrees in computer science, computer engineering and electrical engineering fell 6.6%, 13.7%, and 9.4% respectively.
As I wrote at the time, “Obviously, if these skills were in short supply, as corporations [and their economist shills] allege, the shortage would result in rising salaries as employers bid for scarce human resources.” How can economics account for a shortage of skills and a fall in pay?
H-1B visas have a statutory cap of 85,000 annually. The number consists of 65,000 visas plus 20,000 for foreigners who have an advanced degree from a US university. Over ten years, that comes to 850,000 foreigners brought into the US to take Americans’ jobs. These visas are sought by foreign students studying in America, because it is a way of staying in the country. At the end of the visa, H-1B holders can apply for a green card or permanent residence.
As few of the 85,000 per year return home to their countries, the obvious consequence is that some American occupations are being de-Americanized. This is also true of university faculties where H-1B visas are used to meet DEI quotas while large numbers of Americans with Ph.D. degrees are denied an academic career“`. Recently the Biden regime expanded or removed the limit on H-1B visas for universities and non-profits. Soon a student will be able to have the same professors at Harvard as he would have if he went to university in India. What does Harvard care? It trades on its name.
In addition to H-1B visas there are L-1 visas that allow multinational companies to bring foreign employees to the US for “training.” With extensions the visa can be good for seven years. Between 1997 and 2019 the US Citizenship and Immigration Services approved 1.5 million L-1 visas, according to Wikipedia. Citizens of India are the largest recipients of L-1 visas.
Allegedly, the H-1B visas were not to be used to replace US workers and are supposed to be paid the same amount as an American employee. But there are easy ways around these restrictions. Law firms are employed to advertise job openings in ways that disqualify Americans. You can read about that in my book. In 2007 the law firm, Cohen & Grigsby explained in a marketing video how the firm evades the restrictions for its clients. The firm’s marketing manager, Lawrence Lebowitz said, “our goal is clearly not to find a qualified and interested US worker.”
There are many ways around the various “restrictions” on the visas. During the bank bailout Congress forbade banks that received bailout money from hiring foreigners to replace Americans, but the H-1B lobby had a loophole inserted into the legislation. The loophole let banks hire contractors to supply “contract labor.” Consequently, the banks paid the contractor, and the contractor, not the banks, hired and paid the foreign workers. In 2009 Computerworld reported that the H-1B visas were becoming the property of Indian contract labor firms.
The American Immigration Council, a lobby for H-1B visas, alleges that multiple studies have found that bringing in foreign workers on H-1B visas increases the employment opportunities for American workers. I exposed the fraudulent nature of these “studies” when they came out.
Matthew J. Slaughter, a member of President George W. Bush’s Council of Economic Advisers, mistakenly found an increase in American employment in an increase in multinational corporation employment that resulted from the multinational corporations’ purchases of smaller firms. Multinational corporation employment rose from the purchases of existing firms, not from jobs offshoring and H-1B visas causing more Americans to be employed.
Harvard professor Michael Porter concluded that America’s lead in GDP per capita, household wealth, and falling poverty rates were proof that the US was benefitting from jobs offshoring and all other foreign employment practices associated with globalism. What Porter did was to use a 20-year period so that the deterioration from globalism was softened by the stronger performance from earlier times.
My exposure of the fraudulent claims had no effect on policy. My voice was no match for the power of campaign contributions and the lobby groups. American corporations and “the people’s representatives” could not care less about the fate of Americans. The American corporations want profits and their executives want their “performance” bonuses. Congress wants campaign contributions and friends to look after them if they lose an election.
There is no one to look after the American worker, not even Donald Trump and Elon Musk.
Trump and Musk think of greatness in terms of profits. If profits are great, the country is. Thus their policy will continue the shift in the distribution of income from the working class to the one percent. Really it is the one-tenth of one percent that benefits while all the rest lose.
The question America needs to face is how is there unity and a nation when economic prospects are limited to one-tenth of one percent of the population, when democracy represents only the elite and never the people, when the people’s protections guaranteed by the US Constitution are discarded by law schools, the US Department of Justice (sic), bar associations, and by judges themselves, when racial, gender, and sexual preference privileges overturn the Constitution’s requirement of equality under the law, when the Constitution’s requirements of due process, free speech, the right of assembly and protest are suspended because of false claims of “terrorism” and “misinformation.”
Terrorism and misinformation are Washington’s products. Terrorism originates not from Russia, China, Iran, Arabs; it originates from Washington. Just ask the Palestinians, the Libyans, Syrians, Iraqis. Misinformation comes from a domestic intellectual class that hates America. Misinformation is a domestic product from self-serving agendas and presstitutes that support the agendas. Official misinformation keeps Americans in a muddle so that they lack realization of their dispossession of their rights.
Tell me, how can a country in which the people have no voice be made great again.
Trump’s supporters believe that his election has solved the problem. They could not be more wrong. Indeed, when it comes to American employment, it looks like Trump is part of the problem.
If Trump demoralizes his supporters, the result will be a demoralized population. Where will the resistance to tyranny come from?
Andrew Anglin claims ( https://www.unz.com/aanglin/pyramid-schemer-patrick-bet-david-continues-deluge-of-shit-campaign-with-fraudulent-statistics/ ) that the statutory cap on H-1B visas is not enforced and that the US government “issues hundreds of thousands of exemptions” that resulted in 755,020 H-1B visas in 2023, 72.3% of them going to citizens of India. He attributes the data to the Department of Homeland Security but does not provide the source or URL.
My opinion based on what I know at this time is that Anglin was misled by reports on H-1B visa approvals and concluded that all of the annual approvals were for new H-1B visas, which would be a number in violation of law. As I understand it, the visas are good for six or seven years and must be annually approved to continue. If we take the annual approval for continuation of, say, 6 years of visas, it would come to 85,000 times 6 which comes to 510,000 visa approvals + the 85,000 newly approved visas for a total of 595,000. In other words, not all H-1B visa approvals are annual approvals of new visas. Most are continuations of the old. The articles are not clear about this, and I think misled Anglin.
There are other approvals associated with the visas. I forget what they all are, but perhaps for example a visa holder needs to go home for reasons, say, the death of a parent, and wants to return; a visa holder wants at the end of his six years to apply for a green card; a holder wants his visa extended to 7 years. I am confident that if the government was breaking the cap of H-1B visa issuance, H-1B opponents would have brought a law suit.
The H-1B legislation does not provide the executive branch with authority to override the law limiting the visas. If the US government is actually issuing almost 9 times the number of H-1B visas permitted by law, it would seem to be strong grounds for H-1B opponents to bring a law suit. I also wonder why Congress would stand aside while the government ignores the law. Is Congress that unconcerned with its authority? It is not characteristic of Washington for people to piss away their power. If Congress wants to make 755,020 H-1B visas annually available, it can do so and collect more campaign contributions as its price. The caps have been adjusted over the years reaching 195,000 annually during the presidency of George W. Bush, 2.3 times higher than under the open borders Biden regime.
The issue is the existence of the H-1B visa, not its numbers. The case for the visa is fraudulent. The visas benefit corporate executives and shareholders at the expense of the prospects of native-born American citizens and change the country’s cultural and racial character. H-1B visas are helping to transform the United States into a Tower of Babel with an economy dependent on cheap foreign labor for its profits.
[…]
Via https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2025/01/05/where-is-trump-when-working-americans-need-him/