Unknown's avatar

About stuartbramhall

Retired child and adolescent psychiatrist and American expatriate in New Zealand. In 2002, I made the difficult decision to close my 25-year Seattle practice after 15 years of covert FBI harassment. I describe the unrelenting phone harassment, illegal break-ins and six attempts on my life in my 2010 book The Most Revolutionary Act: Memoir of an American Refugee.

Iranian retaliatory strikes cripple US Fifth Fleet in Bahrain, redraw Persian Gulf power map

By Mohammad Molaei 

The high-precision, coordinated, and destructive retaliatory strikes by the Iranian Armed Forces against key targets in the Persian Gulf in recent weeks, particularly the US Fifth Fleet base in Bahrain, have underscored the decisive leverage Iran now holds in the region.

Headquartered in Manama, the Fifth Fleet base has long been considered a “floating fortress.” Yet recent Iranian operations have revealed it as one of the most vulnerable strategic nodes, representing a critical weakness in American military planning when faced with Iran’s precise, layered, and asymmetric deterrence doctrine.

As part of Operation True Promise 4, Iran’s missile and drone strikes were launched in response to the unprovoked and illegal US-Israeli aggression against Iranian territory.

The strikes repeatedly targeted the Fifth Fleet’s headquarters in the Bandar Mina region, demonstrating that Iran not only has the capability to reach this strategic base but has also pioneered a new model of asymmetric warfare.

Precision ballistic missiles and Shahed-136 drones were employed to neutralize American defensive measures, radar systems, and communication networks, effectively paralyzing the base’s operational capacity.

The strategic impact of these strikes, beginning February 28, has been verified through satellite imagery and videos showing direct hits on radomes and large-scale explosions across the compound. The operations send a clear message to Washington and its allies: the Persian Gulf can no longer be treated as an American backyard.

Any military presence or aggressive actions against Iranian interests and the Axis of Resistance will now meet with precise, immediate, and formidable consequences, elevating Iranian deterrence to unprecedented levels.

From British colonial legacy to US aggression in the region

The history of the US military presence in Bahrain stretches back to the 1940s, when the US Navy, under the title “Middle East Force” (MIDEASTFOR), began a continuous and destabilizing presence in the region. In 1950, the United States leased facilities from the British Royal Forces at HMS Jufair Base, establishing its central office and solidifying its foothold in the Persian Gulf.

Following Bahrain’s independence in 1971, the US seized part of the former British Royal Force Base to establish the “Administrative Support Unit Bahrain.” Initially housing only a few hundred personnel, the base rapidly evolved into the logistical, communication, and operational hub for all US naval activity in the Persian Gulf.

The base’s strategic importance grew further in 1983 with the establishment of the US Naval Forces Central Command (NAVCENT). In 1995, after 48 years of inactivity, the US Fifth Fleet was reactivated, replacing MIDEASTFOR with expanded operational mandates.

By 1999, the facility was officially renamed “Naval Support Activity Bahrain – NSA Bahrain,” reflecting its enlarged role in logistics, command and control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C4ISR).

Today, NSA Bahrain sits in the Juffair district at the heart of the Bahraini capital, covering 152 hectares and hosting between 8,000 and 9,000 US military personnel, alongside 78 joint and coalition tenant commands.

Significant expansions between 1997, 2003, 2006, and particularly 2010, 2015, including advanced ammunition storage, service facilities, communication towers, and SATCOM radar systems, have made the base a critical nerve center. Without it, the American military machine in the region would be severely constrained.

The presence of NSA Bahrain is a direct continuation of the legacy of British colonial influence, now transformed into a launchpad for US naval operations against Iran and the Axis of Resistance, asserting US power and projecting strategic dominance across the Persian Gulf.

Beating heart of the US naval command

NSA Bahrain is not merely a logistical support base, but a joint operational command center for the Fifth Fleet and NAVCENT, and as such, it carries the responsibility of overseeing a regional area of 6.5 million square kilometers or 2.5 million square miles.

This area is vast and vital, comprising the Persian Gulf, Red Sea, Sea of Oman, Indian Ocean, and the three vital straits of Hormuz, Bab el-Mandeb, and Suez, through which the flow of 30 percent of the world’s crude oil, the bulk of global trade, and the region’s oil flow, and without whose control, the global economy of the American regime and its Zionist allies would be effectively paralyzed.

This base accommodates more than 20 permanent or rotational warships and combat vessels, dozens of state-of-the-art AESA radar, AN/GSC-52B satellite communication, a host of highly advanced unmanned drones under Task Force 59, and C4ISR capabilities that enable the real-time surveillance of the movements of Iranian forces, vessels of resistance, and even Ansarullah drones in Yemen.

The primary role of this base extends far beyond simple logistics. It serves as a central hub for controlling naval operations, directly supporting Carrier Strike Groups with thousands of troops and aircraft. It also underpins fabricated coalitions such as the Combined Maritime Forces (CMF), specifically Task Force 59, facilitating manned-unmanned teaming operations.

The base further supports unmanned naval platforms, including the Sea Hunter, MQ-9B Sea Guardian, and MQ-4C Triton, cementing its position as a pivotal tool for exerting constant pressure on the Islamic Republic of Iran, safeguarding the survival of the Zionist regime, and exploiting the region’s energy resources.

Task Force 59, in particular, was explicitly designed to track and monitor the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps Navy (IRGCN) in the Strait of Hormuz, employing artificial intelligence and advanced ISR technologies to provide “more eyes on the water” and maintain the illusion of American deterrence.

From the perspective of US military doctrine, this base is celebrated as the “guardian of freedom of navigation” and the “guarantor of maritime security.” In stark contrast, on the ground, it operates as the beating heart of naval aggression, constant espionage, and intelligence-military operations targeting the Axis of Resistance.

It functions as the launchpad for nearly all US occupation operations, from the Gulf War to recent actions in the Red Sea. Without this facility, coordination of operations in the Strait of Hormuz, support for attacks on Yemen, tracking of resistance vessels, and even the control of aircraft carriers in the region would be impossible.

This absolute dependence on NSA Bahrain has paradoxically made it one of the strategic vulnerabilities of the American occupying regime. Its critical role was fully exposed during the Ramadan War, highlighting the limits of US power against the layered, decisive, and asymmetric deterrence capabilities of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Key aggressive operations of the base

Since its establishment in 1995, the US Fifth Fleet has served as the epicenter of all American military operations in the region. During the Gulf War in the early 1990s, NSA Bahrain played a central role in aggressive campaigns against Iraq.

From this base, the US war fleet launched hundreds of Tomahawk missiles at Iraqi infrastructure and provided air cover through aircraft carriers. These operations resulted in the deaths of thousands of civilians and caused decades-long instability across the region.

During the US occupation of Iraq in the early 2000s, NSA Bahrain became the logistical hub supplying fuel, ammunition, and operational support to the American naval forces in the Persian Gulf. In recent years, the base has been at the heart of hostile operations in Yemen, ostensibly framed as a campaign against piracy, but in reality targeting the Iranian fleet and Yemeni drones.

Task Force 59 has been instrumental in these espionage and surveillance operations, providing intelligence and coordination for attacks under the guise of maritime security.

More recently, in operations in the Red Sea, NSA Bahrain continued its role as the center of aggressive US hostile maneuvers. These operations claimed to protect the Zionist regime against Yemeni counterattacks but were in reality attempts to secure control over the Bab el-Mandeb Strait and coordinate American strike groups.

These operations ultimately failed, exposing the vulnerabilities of the US fleet and resulting in significant losses, highlighting the limits of US power despite the strategic weight of this base.

Role in the Ramadan War

As part of its decisive and legitimate response to the recent US-Zionist aggression on Iranian territory, the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran targeted the NSA Bahrain base in the Bandar Mina region, beginning February 28, 2026.

The series of operations, starting on February 28, has employed a precise, multi-layered strike strategy, combining short-range ballistic missiles from the Fateh and Fath families – known for their high maneuverability and advanced guidance systems, with Shahed-136 suicide drones carrying 250-pound warheads, guided via inertial and GPS systems.

These drones, flying at low altitude and relatively low speeds, were able to penetrate radar and electronic warfare defenses, striking one of the larger domed radomes within the base’s Command Compound with pinpoint accuracy. Video footage released from field sources captured the exact moment of impact, explosion, and ensuing fires.

In the following days, satellite imagery, including data from Chinese sources, verified extensive damage to NSA Bahrain. Hits were also confirmed on hangars and shelters at the nearby King Isa Air Base, a critical facility supporting the US Fifth Fleet and NAVCENT operations.

Among the damaged infrastructure were two AN/GSC-52B satellite communication terminals, which form the backbone of the Fifth Fleet’s C4ISR network, providing secure real-time communication with aircraft carriers, MQ-4C Triton drones, P-8A Poseidon patrol aircraft, and CENTCOM command centers.

Beyond radomes and SATCOM systems, satellite images show severe damage to ammunition depots, service facilities, command support buildings, and advanced communication infrastructure, with extensive fires spreading across the base.

These strikes disrupted the Fifth Fleet’s AESA radar systems and secure satellite communications for hours, even days. Leveraging indigenous electronic warfare capabilities (ECCM/ECM) and the IRGC’s intelligence network, Iranian forces effectively neutralized the base’s defensive measures, rendering sophisticated American radar systems ineffective.

While the Bahraini regime has condemned the strike as a “violation of sovereignty,” the reality is that the American military presence on Bahraini soil, at both NSA Bahrain and King Isa Air Base, constitutes ongoing aggression against regional sovereignty.

This operation exemplifies Iran’s policy of layered, precise, and asymmetric deterrence, tested and refined to unprecedented levels during the Ramadan War.

The strikes reveal that NSA Bahrain is no longer a symbol of US power. It now represents vulnerability, paralysis of naval command structures, and the failure of American strategic calculations.

The Ramadan War, now into its 31st day, marks the beginning of a new chapter in Iran’s deterrence doctrine: one defined by defensive self-sufficiency, indigenous missile and drone expertise, and a readiness to respond to aggression with precise, devastating, and unpredictable force.

The message is clear: the Persian Gulf will no longer be treated as an American fortress.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/03/31/766128/iranian-retaliatory-strikes-cripple-us-fifth-fleet-bahrain-redraw-persian-gulf-power-map

France, Italy join Spain in resisting Trump’s pressure to join war on Iran

A US Navy fighter jet prepares to launch from USS Abraham Lincoln, in a photo released on March 2. (Photo by US Navy)

Press TV

France and Italy have joined Spain in resisting Donald Trump’s pressure to support US-Israeli aggression against Iran, as the illegal war he launched is now in its fifth week.

Spain said on Monday that it had closed its airspace to US planes involved in airstrikes on Iran. The move angered Trump, who described NATO allies as “cowards.”

In a report on Tuesday, Reuters cited sources familiar with the matter stating that France has also refused to allow Israeli aircraft carrying US weapons to cross its airspace. France reportedly refused the request over the weekend.

The US president reacted to the decision in a post on his Truth Social platform on Tuesday, warning that Washington “will remember.”

The decision in Paris came after Italy last week denied permission for US military aircraft to land at the Sigonella air base in Sicily before heading to West Asia, according to the report.

Some US bombers had been due to land at the base in eastern Sicily before flying to West Asia.

Poland also said recently that it has no plans to relocate one of its Patriot batteries.

Washington had previously claimed that Warsaw was considering sending the system to help shore up air defenses in the region.

In a similar move, Portugal has adopted a cautious stance on US use of the Lajes Air Base in the Azores.

European leaders are increasingly turning down Trump’s requests to use their airspace, as closing large parts of southern European airspace would force US bombers based in the UK to take a longer route to the Persian Gulf.

This would add time, put extra strain on flight crews, and require more aerial refueling.

This comes as the US had already suffered a tanker setback earlier in the war, when Iraqi resistance groups downed a KC-135 in an incident that killed all six crew members aboard.

Trump is pressuring NATO allies for support, while European governments have already rebuffed his calls for help in securing passage through the Strait of Hormuz.

Since US and Israel launched the aggression against Iran on February 28, the country has closed the strategic waterway to enemy vessels and those belonging to countries aiding the aggressors.

Citing familiar sources, the Wall Street Journal reported on Monday that Trump is willing to end the aggression against Iran without reopening the Strait of Hormuz.

The report said that the US president told aides he was prepared to wrap up the aggression even if the strait remained largely closed, after concluding that forcing it open would push the war beyond a four- to six-week timeline.

This comes as Trump had repeatedly threatened consequences if the waterway were not reopened.

[…]

Yemen enters Iran war: Red Sea blockade and strikes on US Navy on the table

As Yemen’s Ansar Allah has jumped into the fray (https://t.me/geopolitics_prime/67400), it could throw plenty of unwanted surprises at the US‑Israeli coalition, Tehran‑based political analyst Professor Mohammad Marandi tells Norwegian academic Glenn Diesen.

💬 “We are still not very much up the escalation ladder,” Marandi says.

💬 “Yemen has joined, but its targets are so far limited. Iran has been involved for weeks now, but again it can go much further. There is talk that the Iraqis may take Kuwait.”

What to expect from Ansar Allah:

🔴 Closure of the Red Sea

🔴 Strikes on Saudi Arabia’s oil facilities, potentially cutting its oil imports from the Red Sea completely

🔴 Strikes on Israeli assets

🔴 Strikes on US assets in the Indian Ocean

💬 “We don’t know what weapons [Ansar Allah] now has; obviously, over the past year they’ve been developing their capabilities swiftly, just like Iran did.”

Via https://t.me/geopolitics_prime/67500

Growing insecurity, soaring prices fuel protests in northern Israel as regime bans evacuation

An Israeli settler stands in the settlement of ‘Metula’ in northern occupied territories. (AP Photo)

Press TV

The worsening situation on the internal front of the Israeli regime, particularly in the northern occupied territories, has driven up food and transportation prices, fueling settler discontent.

According to informed security sources, regime authorities have refused to permit the evacuation of settlers from northern areas, despite deteriorating security conditions amid Hezbollah’s unstoppable retaliatory strikes.

Rising costs of essential goods, including food and transportation, have intensified pressure on settlers, contributing to a growing wave of anti-regime protests.

Discussions across Israeli social media platforms reflect increasing skepticism toward official narratives regarding developments in the north.

Users have questioned regime claims on the extent of damage and casualties, asserting that actual losses far exceed what is being reported.

Some posts also emphasize that the regime’s defensive capabilities in the region have significantly degraded, while Hezbollah has effectively rendered life unsustainable for settlers in northern areas.

Meanwhile, emerging reports suggest that regime authorities are deliberately avoiding a full evacuation of settlers from the north, even as security conditions worsen amid intense exchanges of fire.

Analysts attribute this decision to deep concerns that, once evacuated, settlers may refuse to return – a scenario that would deliver a severe blow to the regime’s long-term strategic position in the area.

According to sources, military forces have been deployed to forcibly prevent settlers from leaving, underscoring the regime’s determination to project an appearance of normalcy even as conditions on the ground tell a different story.

Hezbollah has carried out a record number of retaliatory operations against the occupied territories, sowing fear among the settler population in the north.

Yet the regime remains intent on portraying normalcy across the occupied territories while concealing the true scale of casualties and damage sustained from retaliatory strikes, both from Hezbollah and the Iranian armed forces.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/03/30/766082/growing-insecurity-soaring-food-prices-fuel-protests-regime-bans-evacuation-sources

Russian tanker bypasses US oil blockade of Cuba

Russian tanker bypasses US oil blockade of Cuba

RT

A Russian tanker has arrived in Cuba to deliver a humanitarian oil shipment amid a months-long US blockade that has led to severe fuel shortages and recurring power cuts across the island.

Russia’s Energy Ministry reported that the Anatoly Kolodkin, carrying 100,000 tons of crude oil, has docked at the port of Matanzas and now waits to be unloaded.

Despite US Coast Guard ships being present in the region, “the Trump administration did not order those vessels to act,” an official familiar with the matter told the New York Times.

“Barring orders instructing it otherwise, the Coast Guard planned to let the tanker reach Cuba as of Sunday afternoon,” the source added, speaking on condition of anonymity.

US President Donald Trump has repeatedly threatened tariffs on countries exporting fuel to Cuba. However, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday, he confirmed that Washington had allowed the Russian tanker through on humanitarian grounds.

“We don’t mind having somebody get a boat load because they need to survive,” he said. “I’d prefer letting it in, whether it’s Russia or anybody else, because the people need heat and cooling.”

Trump, however, added that he still expects Havana to “fail soon,” saying the US would be there to “help it out.”

The Caribbean nation has faced severe fuel shortages and power cuts in recent months after Venezuela, once Havana’s closest ally, halted oil shipments following pressure from Washington.

Multiple international fuel deliveries have been disrupted, vessels linked to Havana have struggled to secure supplies, and some have been turned away or intercepted – with at least one escorted away from Cuban waters, according to ship-tracking data.

Earlier this month, Havana agreed to enter talks with Washington in a bid to defuse tensions and avert a humanitarian crisis. Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel confirmed that negotiations were ongoing and aimed at “finding solutions through dialogue to the bilateral differences we have between the two nations.”

Trump, however, has not abandoned his stated intention to take over the island “one way or another.” On Friday, he said Cuba could be “next” following what he described as successful US military operations in Venezuela and Iran.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/636691-russian-oil-cuba-us-blockade/

What damage has Iran inflicted on US military bases?

What damage has Iran inflicted on US military bases?

RT

The tally of US military bases targeted in Iranian strikes continues to rise, with Washington acknowledging attacks across multiple countries. While Iranian military and media sources put the number of targeted bases at more than a dozen, the Pentagon is apparently doing its best to conceal the destruction.

Within hours of the US launching ‘Operation Epic Fury’ on February 28, Iran unleashed retaliatory strikes against American military bases across the Middle East, with US officials confirming a growing number of sites hit and the Prince Sultan base in Saudi Arabia emerging as a focal point of the campaign.

Behind a veil of censorship, it’s increasingly clear that the damage may be far more severe than the Pentagon is admitting.

The reported damage to high-value assets such as an E-3 AWACS aircraft and an F-35 fighter jet points to a broader pattern of Iran targeting US airpower and surveillance capabilities. An E-3 Sentry was reportedly damaged or destroyed in a March 27 strike on Prince Sultan Air Base. Earlier, a US F-35 was damaged during a mission over Iran and forced to make an emergency landing, while three US F-15E jets were shot down over Kuwait on March 2 in an apparent friendly fire incident, US Central Command (CENTCOM) said.

With the war entering its second month, the US death toll continues to rise. The US military has confirmed 13 fatalities from Iranian attacks across the region, while more than 300 troops have been wounded, according to US officials cited by Reuters in late March.

New strikes and expanding damage

Iran has continued to expand the scope of its attacks beyond the initial wave. Iranian military statements carried by local media have in recent days named targets including Camp Arifjan in Kuwait, Prince Sultan Air Base near Al-Kharj in Saudi Arabia, and Sheikh Isa Air Base in Bahrain, while also referring more broadly to strikes on US positions in Iraq, the UAE, and across the Gulf. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) also claimed it had targeted the US Fifth Fleet and destroyed “high-value” American military equipment.

A March 27 Iranian missile and drone strike on Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia wounded 12 US troops, two of them seriously, according to a US official cited by Reuters. The attack also damaged several US aircraft, according to American officials, with separate reports indicating that refueling planes were among those hit.

US and Arab officials cited by the Wall Street Journal said the same strike also hit a Boeing E-3 Sentry airborne warning and control system (AWACS) aircraft, a critical surveillance platform. The IRGC said the aircraft was “100% destroyed” in the strike, while open-source flight tracking data indicated that multiple such planes had been stationed at the base in recent weeks. The E-3, a key command-and-control platform, costs around $270 million to produce. CENTCOM has not publicly confirmed the extent of the reported damage.

Iranian media on Sunday claimed fresh drone and rocket strikes on US-linked facilities in Iraq, including targets around Baghdad and the Victory Base complex. Earlier Reuters reported a drone strike on a US diplomatic facility near Baghdad airport on March 10, followed by further rocket and drone attacks on March 17.

How many bases does the US have in the Middle East?

The US operates a network of around 20 permanent and temporary military bases throughout the Middle East, with the largest – Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar – hosting 10,000 troops and serving as the forward headquarters for CENTCOM. The US maintains a network of major military bases across Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, and as of mid-2025, there are between 40,000 and 50,000 American troops stationed in the region at any one time.

RT

 

These bases surround Iran from the west and south, and are backed by US naval assets in the region, including the USS Abraham Lincoln in the Arabian Sea, alongside amphibious forces in the region, including the USS Tripoli, with additional carrier reinforcements expected. The USS Gerald R. Ford has been pulled out of the Middle East and moved to port for repairs following a fire, leaving the Lincoln as the only carrier currently on station.

Recent deployments have further expanded the US military footprint in the region. The arrival of around 2,500 marines and 2,500 sailors has pushed the total number of American troops in the Middle East to more than 50,000, roughly 10,000 above typical levels, according to a US military official cited by the New York Times.

Which US bases have been hit?

All of the US bases in the region have been described as “legitimate targets” by the Iranian military, and facilities in seven countries have already been hit by Iranian missiles and drones.

As of late March, the following US bases and associated facilities have been struck by Iranian missiles and drones, often more than once, according to US officials, media reports, and regional sources:

  • Naval Support Activity, Bahrain
  • Erbil International Airport, Iraq
  • Al-Asad Airbase, Iraq
  • Victory Base complex (Baghdad International Airport area)
  • Muwaffaq Salti Air Base, Jordan
  • Ali Al-Salem Air Base, Kuwait
  • Camp Buehring, Kuwait
  • Camp Arifjan, Kuwait
  • Mohammed Al-Ahmad Naval Base, Kuwait
  • Al-Udeid Air Base, Qatar
  • Al-Dhafra Air Base, UAE
  • Jebel Ali Port, UAE
  • Prince Sultan Air Base, Saudi Arabia.

Several of these strikes have been confirmed by US officials or reported by Reuters and other international media, while others remain based primarily on Iranian claims.

What’s on Iran’s target list?

The strikes on American air bases serve the immediate goal of reducing US ability to conduct air operations over Iran and forcing aircraft to operate from more distant locations. Iran’s campaign has also focused heavily on radar and missile defense systems, including THAAD-linked installations and early warning radars across the region.

Special Consultant to United Nations RESIGNS – LEAKS NUCLEAR ATTACK PLANNING FOR IRAN

Muhammad Safa was the Executive Director and Main Representative at the United Nations in New York City, for the “PVA” a designated “Special Consultative Group” handling Human Rights issues.   He resigned 48 Hours ago, and tonight, he has LEAKED NUCLEAR ATTACK PLANNING in the Iran conflict.

[…]

Via https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/component/content/article/special-consultant-to-united-nations-resigns-48-hours-later-leaks-nuclear-attack-planning-for-iran?catid=17&Itemid=101

Kids’ Sleeping Problems Linked to Wireless Radiation, Screens

child having hard time sleeping

 

The number of children and teens ages 5-19 in Sweden diagnosed with sleep disorders has increased roughly 17-fold since 2001, according to a new peer-reviewed study.

Kids ages 0-4 saw a roughly five-fold increase, said the study authors, who published their report on Jan. 8 in Diseases.

The authors said the sharp uptick in sleeping problems coincided with the increased use of cellphones and the widespread proliferation of 5G cell towers, which emit radiofrequency (RF) radiation.

The increased use of screens, which emit blue light, is also a likely culprit, they said. Blue light can disrupt hormones like melatonin that affect sleep, according to Harvard Health Publishing.

“The steep increase of sleep problems among children aged 0-19 years is extremely concerning because sleep is, of course, of vital importance for good health, the study’s lead author, Mona Nilsson, told The Defender.

Nilsson and her co-author, Lennart Hardell, M.D., Ph.D., analyzed national health statistics on sleep disorder diagnoses from 2001-2024.

Nilsson is co-founder and director of the Swedish Radiation Protection Foundation. Hardell is an oncologist and epidemiologist with the Environment and Cancer Research Foundation. He’s also the author of more than 350 papers, nearly 60 of which address RF radiation, and one of the first researchers to publish reports on the toxicity of Agent Orange.

In addition to finding that the number of sleep problems among kids had dramatically risen, Nilsson and Hardell noted that young adults ages 20-39 saw a roughly five-fold increase in sleep problems, too.

For years, scientists have warned about the harmful effects of wireless radiation, including sleep problems, Nilsson said. “But unfortunately, the telecommunications industry has captured most influential organizations responsible for protecting the public.”

According to Nilsson, the World Health Organization, the European Union and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) protect the wireless industry’s interests, rather than people’s health.

“This situation needs to change rapidly so that the evidence is objectively evaluated, independent experts are heard and people are informed about the many health risks with this technology,” she said.

Hardell agreed. “Our results must be taken seriously,” he told The Defender.

According to Hardell, mainstream media have reported on the rising number of sleep problems among kids and teens. “But so far the impact of exposure to radiofrequency radiation has not been considered.”

Findings on sleep problems add to earlier findings of memory problems

In October 2025, Hardell and Nilsson published a study showing that children ages 5-19 in Sweden and Norway were experiencing an “alarming” rise in memory problems. The increase also coincided with the rise in RF radiation exposure.

According to Nilsson, the sleep and memory problems being experienced by Swedish youth are likely related. She noted that research has repeatedly shown that RF radiation from wireless technology impairs the brain.

She shared with The Defender a list of nearly 60 studies that document RF radiation’s negative effect on learning and memory.

‘The evidence keeps getting stronger and stronger’

The study’s new findings on increased sleep problems add to the growing pile of studies that suggest RF radiation is undermining kids’ health, said Miriam Eckenfels, director of Children’s Health Defense’s (CHD) Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) & Wireless Program.

“The evidence keeps getting stronger and stronger as more studies are published that associate RF radiation with more negative health impacts,” Eckenfels said. “It is about time governments take this issue more seriously.”

However, the FCC is trying to adopt new rules that would make it easy for telecom companies to install cell towers in communities without residents’ consent — even if the tower isn’t really needed to close a coverage gap in cell service, she said.

On Nov. 25, 2025, CHD filed a motion with the FCC, urging the agency to comply with a 2021 court order to review evidence that RF radiation at levels currently allowed by the agency harms people, especially children, and the environment.

“The document essentially tells the FCC to either protect people, or get out of the way and let other federal agencies, like the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, set health and safety limits for wireless radiation exposure,” Eckenfels said.

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/kids-sleeping-problems-linked-to-wireless-radiation-screens/

Lawmakers Launch Bipartisan Bill to Block Trump’s Executive Order on Glyphosate

Glyphosate sign and u.s. capitol building

Two days after President Donald Trump ordered the U.S. to boost production of glyphosate, two federal lawmakers introduced bipartisan legislation to block the controversial executive order.

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-Maine) on Friday introduced the No Immunity for Glyphosate Act (H.R. 7601).

If passed, the bill would block federal funding to implement the executive order. The legislation also explicitly grants people injured by glyphosate — or elemental phosphorus, its key ingredient — to sue manufacturers for their injuries.

Trump’s executive order offered U.S.-based chemical makers immunity from liability if the government orders them, under the Defense Production Act of 1950, to produce glyphosate.

Glyphosate is the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup weedkiller. Bayer, which acquired Monsanto in June 2018, is facing tens of thousands of lawsuits from people alleging Roundup caused them to develop cancer. The company is the only producer of the chemical in the U.S. It also supplies about 40% of the world’s glyphosate.

Bayer has been aggressively pursuing legislative and judicial strategies to block such lawsuits at the state and federal levels.

“If we’re Making America Healthy Again, government shouldn’t be promoting glyphosate and providing liability immunity for corporations making it,” Massie said on X.

Co-sponsors also include a mix of Republicans and Democrats — including Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.). Farm Action Fund endorsed the bill.

Pingree: executive order is ‘dangerous and indefensible’

In a press release, Massie said, “Congress should ensure that Americans retain their right to seek a remedy in court if they believe they have been injured by this product.”

Pingree echoed the need to safeguard public health and accountability, calling the executive order “dangerous and indefensible.”

Trump’s order stated that elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides are scarce materials critical to national defense, and that inadequate domestic production poses an imminent threat to military readiness and food security.

“Glyphosate-based herbicides are a cornerstone of this Nation’s agricultural productivity and rural economy,” it said.

But Pingree said the order “has nothing to do with protecting farmers or feeding the country — it’s about protecting corporate profits and insulating polluters from accountability.”

Executive order triggers cascade of criticism

Glyphosate, the active ingredient in widely used herbicides such as Roundup, has been at the center of decades of legal and scientific debate.

Roundup Ready crops, genetically engineered by Monsanto to withstand glyphosate application, dominate U.S. agriculture. Over 90% of soybeans, cotton and corn are produced in the U.S. using the technology.

The widespread use of the seeds has led to Roundup-resistant “superweeds,” forcing farmers to use greater quantities of chemicals.

Studies link glyphosate to cancer and other serious health issues, including harm to the kidney, liver, immune system, reproductive system, and during early-life development.

In December, the hallmark 2000 paper widely cited as evidence that Roundup is safe was retracted due to “serious ethical concerns.” Evidence showed that Monsanto employees helped ghostwrite the paper.

Bayer has faced tens of thousands of lawsuits alleging the chemical causes cancer. Just days before the executive order, the company proposed a $7.25 billion settlement to resolve many of those claims.

Trump’s executive order outraged MAHA, or Make America Healthy Again, activists, many of whom have been fighting the use of Roundup and other glyphosate-based weedkillers for decades.

Zen Honeycutt of Moms Across America told The Defender the decision was a betrayal of Trump’s earlier promises on health reform, and said it “paved the path for glyphosate to continue destroying farmland, fertility, and our families’ health for generations to come.”

Kelly Ryerson, known on X as “GlyphosateGirl,” who has been lobbying for restrictions on glyphosate and other pesticides, said it was an insult to the people who had supported Trump because of promises that MAHA issues would be taken seriously.

Bayer rolling out multi-pronged strategy to protect itself against liability

Bayer has also been rolling out a series of legislative attempts to constrain consumers’ ability to sue it for health damages from glyphosate.

Earlier this year, a broad bipartisan coalition of food and environmental health advocates succeeded in eliminating a Bayer-backed provision tucked into a congressional appropriations bill that would have restricted the ability of people to sue the company for failing to warn of health risks if the U.S. Food and Drug Administration didn’t require the warnings.

Bayer has been pushing for a similar measure to be written into the pending Farm Bill,

The company also created a lobbying group, the Modern Ag Alliance, which has been pushing for laws at the state level to make it harder for consumers to sue over pesticide risks.

The state laws would shield Bayer from future lawsuits and potentially nullify at least some of the 67,000 active claims against the company. Georgia and North Dakota have passed these liability shield laws.

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/no-immunity-for-glyphosate-act-bipartisan-bill-block-trump-executive-order/?utm_id=20260301

Trump’s MAGA America Whines about ‘Putin Winning’ as India surges Russian Oil Imports

As the US aggression on Iran continues, global oil and natural gas markets frantically look for alternative suppliers.

Naturally, the world’s most populous countries have the highest demand and must ensure their citizens have sufficient energy. Economic consequences of failing to do so would be catastrophic.

This is especially true for India and its rapidly growing economy (nearly 8% in late 2025). Thus, Delhi decided to turn to Russia for emergency oil imports, with Indian refiners acquiring approximately 60 million barrels of Russian oil for April. The mainstream propaganda machine is already pulling its hair out and whining about “Putin winning”, as Russia is expected to make at least $6.5 billion a month through oil trade with India alone.

Bloomberg reports that

“the cargoes were booked at premiums of $5 to $15 a barrel to Brent”.

In simpler terms, this means that Russian oil is about $5–15 more expensive per barrel. Data intelligence firm Kpler reports that “the volume is similar to the amount of purchases for this month, but more than double that for February”.

The US was even forced to waive potential sanctions on India, because shortages would’ve compelled Delhi to seek alternatives either way. Washington DC realized this would’ve further strained Indo-American ties, particularly after the US was caught red-handed supporting terrorists against India and other countries in the region (all orchestrated with full support from the Neo-Nazi junta and its openly terrorist intelligence services).

Delhi has been hit hard by the truly unprovoked US aggression on Iran, as the resulting plunge in oil and natural gas supplies made it impossible to maintain energy security. India has also become a major importer of Russian hydrocarbons since the start of the special military operation (SMO), effectively acting as a middleman for the European Union, which made a suicidal decision to stop buying energy directly from Russia. Washington DC certainly didn’t like the prospect of closer ties between Moscow and Delhi, so it pressured the latter to stop buying Russian energy. India largely switched to trade in other currencies, including Indian rupees (INR) converted to dirhams or yuan, to settle oil purchases, aiming to bypass the USD and Western sanctions.

However, Delhi continued imports from the Middle East (particularly Saudi Arabia and Iraq), meaning that it was left without those supplies after the US launched yet another war in the Middle East.

According to the mainstream propaganda machine, refiners such as Mangalore Refinery & Petrochemicals and Hindustan Mittal Energy, which had allegedly “avoided Russian oil since December”, returned to the market.

In addition, the political West is concerned that India is “increasingly settling purchases of Russian oil in alternative currencies, as they seek to reduce reliance on the dollar amid rising geopolitical tensions and shifts in US policy“. As previously mentioned, this is the only way to circumvent aggressive pressure from the US-led racketeering cartel.

Some sources report that in addition to the Emirati dirham and Chinese yuan, Delhi is also considering the Singaporean and Hong Kong dollar. For the time being, Washington DC is extending waivers for several weeks at a time, which is not enough to secure long-term contracts. The latest such waiver is set to expire on April 11, although it’s highly unlikely that US aggression against Iran will stop by then. The Trump administration will probably extend the waiver, but Russian suppliers are not exactly happy with such arrangements, meaning they’ll insist on long-term contracts. It should be noted that Russia is not pressuring India in any way, much unlike the US, which keeps treating the Asian giant as a “second-rate” power and yet another “vassal”.

Expectedly, Delhi doesn’t appreciate such disrespect, especially after the aforementioned scandal with joint support for terrorists by Washington DC and its Kiev regime satellite. However, India is still trying to maintain its multi-vectored foreign policy framework, meaning that it won’t cut ties with the US. For its part, the Trump administration is still trying to drive a wedge between the Asian giant and its partners in the multipolar world, particularly China. Long-standing border disputes between Beijing and Delhi have been the main tool of America’s strategic manipulation that prevents the two neighbors from establishing much closer ties, particularly in terms of economic cooperation, which would strengthen both their ties and the multipolar bloc itself.

Washington DC sees such a prospect as a strategic and geopolitical nightmare, so it’s expected to continue disrupting this process. However, due to America’s (ab)use of the USD’s dominant position, it’s highly questionable whether it’ll be able to arm-twist India into self-defeating moves after the latter fully switches to other currencies for international trade.

Western financial institutions are deeply concerned by this prospect. For instance, in a note on March 24, Deutsche Bank said that “the conflict is testing the petrodollar’s role as the currency for global oil trade, with one long-term consequence being a potential shift toward the yuan”. Such a change on a mass scale would be catastrophic for the US, as its very parasitical survival would be in question.

On the other hand, regardless of the currency, major oil and natural gas producers outside of the Middle East will make enormous profits from the current situation.

America’s decision to start yet another war of aggression against a sovereign nation that keeps refusing its (neo)colonial diktat is now backfiring and will continue to reverberate for years (if not decades) to come. This is especially true for the Trump administration, which desperately needs a major win before the midterm elections later this year. For the time being, things are not going as planned, which is why Trump now wants a $200 billion budget for war with Iran. This is around a fifth of the Pentagon’s annual spending, demonstrating just how serious the situation is for the US.

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/trumps-maga-america-whines-about-putin-winning-as-india-surges-russian-oil-imports/5920387