Unknown's avatar

About stuartbramhall

Retired child and adolescent psychiatrist and American expatriate in New Zealand. In 2002, I made the difficult decision to close my 25-year Seattle practice after 15 years of covert FBI harassment. I describe the unrelenting phone harassment, illegal break-ins and six attempts on my life in my 2010 book The Most Revolutionary Act: Memoir of an American Refugee.

Evo Morales: Population Uprising in Bolivia Unstoppable

Hector Bernardo

In an interview with PIA-GLOBAL, the former president asserted that the rebellion in Bolivia is “against the neoliberal model and against the neocolonial state.” Morales stated that Washington wants to retain total control of the Lithium Triangle. “Argentina is already in the hands of transnational corporations. Chile too. Only Bolivia remains,” he maintained, adding that there is “a triumvirate,” comprised of Trump, Netanyahu, and Milei, dedicated to attacking popular projects in the region.

In an extensive interview with PIA-GLOBAL, former President of the Plurinational State of Bolivia, Evo Morales, analyzed the current crisis in his country. He spoke about the proscription of his political movement, drew parallels with the Water War and the Gas War, emphasized the geopolitical role of the conflict and Washington’s interests in lithium and rare earth elements, and asserted that there is a triumvirate, formed by Trump, Netanyahu, and Milei, attempting to destabilize popular and leftist parties in the region.

At the beginning of the interview, Morales explained that the current president, Rodrigo Paz Pereira, was elected in a context of proscription. His political movement, “Evo Pueblo,” was barred from participating, and the former president called for blank or invalid votes. Morales asserted that, as a result, blank and invalid votes were the majority (and that absenteeism also increased). This, he affirmed, means that his movement remains the country’s main political force.

The framework of proscription described by Morales would demonstrate an illegitimacy of origin of the Paz Pereira government, which in turn, despite what was stated during its campaign, put into practice a series of adjustment measures and removal of subsidies demanded by the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

“This movement is a rebellion of the people, of people who mobilize even without leaders, against the neoliberal model and against the neocolonial state,” Evo Morales asserted.  


– Is this rebellion similar to the Gas War, the Water War, or the 2005 uprising?

– The same thing. In the Gas War, Goni (Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada) and the entire MNR and ADN (Nationalist Revolutionary Movement and Nationalist Democratic Action) mega-coalition wanted to sell gas to California through an LNG (Liquefied Natural Gas) plant in Chile, all privately owned, and the price was extremely low. But the people rose up.

During the Water War, under the governments of Hugo Banzer and Tuto Quiroga, we participated in the protests with Óscar Olivera and Omar Fernández—who was a senator and has sadly passed away. Together, we led that mobilization and won the battle against the state in Cochabamba: we prevented the privatization of water. They even wanted to privatize rainwater.

Now it’s about lithium, about rare earth elements. By decree, Elon Musk’s Tesla is already in Bolivia, for the lithium. Elon Musk financed the 2019 coup. He says so publicly. They’ve already signed memoranda with the United States and Canada for rare earth elements and lithium.

It’s an uprising to defend natural resources. It’s no longer a mobilization for higher wages, for a school, for a road. That’s over. Two things are converging here: a mobilization for social demands and another for a structural change to the neoliberal model. I call that a popular rebellion, a rebellion against the neoliberal model and against this neocolonial government.

Something analysts often overlook is the Coca War, the war over the coca leaf. For me, the defense of the coca leaf is far more profound than the defense of gas, water, or other natural resources, because under the pretext of fighting drug trafficking, they exploit the issue for purely geopolitical interests. The Cold War brought Operation Condor; the war on terror and the persecution of drug traffickers are instruments of imperialism to dominate nations.

Returning to the current situation, who is calling for this mobilization? Hunger, unemployment, the loss of purchasing power, inflation, the lack of dollars, the return to poverty and extreme poverty. They are all self-organizing. If a leader engages in dialogue, they are rejected as a traitor.

That town—as I said before—had no right to education, no right to be elected. Our parents couldn’t enter the town squares. Because we were forbidden to read and write, today they are professionals.

After the coup, total theft. This crisis is back because of the coup. We made a mistake in electing Lucho Arce. Rodrigo Paz, openly, with great arrogance and overbearingness, handed over the lithium. Hence this uprising, so natural, so profound.

– You have said that the 2019 coup was about lithium and against the indigenous population, and that the United States embassy and the State Department played a fundamental role. What role are the State Department and its local allies playing today? Because we have seen that President Milei sent a plane to Bolivia, and there are allegations about what that plane is being used for.

– Some groups in Bolivia, and especially the Empire, refused to accept that Indigenous people could lead the liberation of our people: political and economic sovereignty. Therefore, I say: it is a coup by the gringo against the Indigenous people.

Our sin was nationalizing (the companies that were in foreign hands) and closing the (US) military base. Before, basic services were provided by foreigners.

The blow was also against our economic model, which was better than the neoliberal model imposed by capitalism.

They didn’t forgive us for the fact that we, along with Álvaro (García Linera) and the cabinet, had developed a plan in 2013-2014 to have 41 lithium plants by 2030. We began in 2018 by inaugurating the first potassium chloride plant, to process 350,000 tons per year—still small, a pilot plant—and 1,000 tons of lithium carbonate. A plant to produce 15,000 tons of lithium carbonate was under construction. That’s when the blow came.

I see this as a fight for lithium. What did the Southern Command say in 2023? “The United States complains about the activity of its adversaries in the lithium triangle, comprised of Bolivia, Chile, and Argentina.” Argentina is already in the hands of transnational corporations. Chile too. Only Bolivia remains. They want to complete their control of the lithium.

Marco Rubio, the United States Secretary of State, said three days ago: “Let there be no mistake: The United States firmly supports the legitimate constitutional government of Bolivia. We will not allow criminals and drug traffickers to overthrow democratically elected leaders in our hemisphere.”

This is not an internal matter, but an international one. And in the new global geopolitical context, the people’s parties, the left, progressive and humanist parties, are in the crosshairs of the Empire. They want to implement the Monroe Doctrine.

– Among all these figures appearing internationally, Israel is also supporting Paz Pereira. What role does Israel play and what interests does it have in this context?

– By decree (Paz Pereira) authorized the presence of an Israeli intelligence and espionage company in Bolivia, according to experts in the field.

I see that there is a triumvirate trying to destabilize popular and left-wing parties: Donald Trump (United States), the Prime Minister of Israel (Benjamin Netanyahu) and Milei (President of Argentina), with allies such as Rodrigo Paz, and the presidents of Chile and Ecuador.

The Argentine plane (sent by Javier Milei’s government to deliver “humanitarian aid”) transported police officers from Santa Cruz to Oruro; it also transported officers from four departments: Santa Cruz, Potosí, Chuquisaca and Tarija, for the repression in La Paz.

– How do you think this situation will be resolved?

– I was saying that if the president (Paz Pereira) had publicly promised that he was not going to privatize basic services —which by Constitution are a human right and cannot be a private business—, that he was not going to privatize natural resources, health or education, I think the tension would stop, it would go down.

I don’t know what the solution is, but the security forces have been overwhelmed. And don’t blame me: we aren’t blocking roads yet, although, in a disciplined manner, we are also affiliated with the Bolivian Workers’ Central Union and are joining the march.

Everyone is angry with the president. La Paz has been under siege for almost two weeks, and Cochabamba, Oruro, and Potosí are also under siege.

This mobilization is now unstoppable. I cannot predict what the outcome will be.

[…]

Via https://libya360.wordpress.com/2026/05/27/evo-morales-the-popular-uprising-in-bolivia-is-unstoppable/

Bond Market About to Break Washington

 

The Manhattan

Historically, when governments reach this stage, they choose to protect the debt market and sacrifice the currency.

he bond market is beginning to force reality onto Washington, and it may ultimately force an end to the Iran war long before politicians or diplomats are willing to admit it.

For months, investors have focused on missiles, retaliation headlines, oil chokepoints, and the possibility of a broader regional escalation from the Iran War. During the geopolitical noise, I urged readers not to overlook stress in financial markets that was happening before the war even started, namely in places like private credit and subprime auto lending. I called these “real crises” hiding behind record highs while “investors” chase gamma squeezes higher in an ongoing distortion feedback loop that is making things look far better than they are under the surface.

And now, beneath all the geopolitical noise, a much more serious, harder to ignore crisis is unfolding. As Cypher says in The Matrix: 

Fasten your seat belt Dorothy, ’cause Kansas is going bye-bye.”

This crisis is in the Treasury market. Bond yields are moving sharply higher, and they are sending a message that policymakers can no longer afford to ignore: the financial system is becoming unstable under the weight of war spending, massive deficits, persistent inflation, and a debt load that was already unsustainable before this conflict began.

Via https://themanhattan.press/business/2026/05/26/the-bond-market-is-about-to-break-washington/

Iran TV shows details of unofficial preliminary US-Iran MoU framework

Al Mayadeen English

The Iranian state television has unveiled a preliminary and unofficial draft memorandum of understanding between Iran and the United States, outlining potential arrangements on maritime activity and regional security.

The draft framework, as per the broadcaster, suggests that the United States would commit to lifting a maritime blockade on Iran. In return, Iran would agree to restore commercial shipping through key maritime routes to pre-escalation levels within one month.

The reported arrangement does not apply to military vessels.

The report also said the draft includes provisions placing the management and regulation of maritime transit routes under Iranian oversight, in coordination with the Sultanate of Oman.

Military base troop status remains unresolved

In detail, the unofficial draft stipulated that the United States would agree in principle to withdraw military forces from areas surrounding Iran, including recently deployed regional assets. However, it added that the status of forces already stationed at established military bases would remain subject to further negotiation.

The Iranian state television further revealed that the draft proposes that, if a final agreement is reached within 60 days, it could be submitted for adoption as a binding United Nations Security Council resolution.

The Iranian state broadcaster added that the understanding reportedly reached in Islamabad remains unresolved and non-final, stressing that Iran would not take any steps without verifiable and tangible confirmation of implementation measures.

US-Iran MoU delayed amid disputes over final wording: CNN 

CNNreported earlier on  Wednesday that a proposed memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the United States and Iran remains uncertain despite earlier signs of broad consensus among negotiators.

According to diplomats familiar with the discussions, officials involved in the talks still do not know when or where the agreement could be formally signed, even after key language in the draft was reportedly finalized over the weekend.

The report said expectations had risen Saturday after US President Donald Trump held calls with Gulf leaders while negotiators considered the text effectively “locked in”. Regional sources cited by CNN said the understanding was viewed as a potential opening toward ending the war, reducing tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, and paving the way for broader negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program and other disputes.

However, progress appears to have stalled over unresolved wording disputes.

Fragile negotiations

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Tuesday that negotiations still required “a couple of days” to settle “disagreements” over a “word or sentence.”

Speaking during a visit to India, Rubio said talks were continuing in Doha and remained centered on “specific language in the initial document,” while insisting that an agreement could still be reached within days despite renewed military escalation.

“The president’s expressed his desire to make it. He’s either going to make a good deal or no deal,” Rubio said, referring to Trump.

The report noted that delays have increased concerns among regional actors who fear the talks could collapse in a manner similar to previous failed diplomatic efforts between Washington and Tehran.

CNN also cited tensions during earlier contacts involving US Vice President JD Vance in Pakistan last month, when Iranian negotiators reportedly accused Washington of altering agreed terms after discussions had advanced.

Mounting pressure

The ceasefire framework underpinning the negotiations has meanwhile entered its eighth week amid mounting regional strain, including renewed instability in the Strait of Hormuz, Iranian warnings of retaliation following recent US attacks, and escalating Israeli aggression against Lebanon.

The latest tensions come after US Central Command confirmed that American forces carried out strikes in southern Iran on Tuesday, claiming the attacks were conducted “in self-defense” during the ongoing ceasefire period.

At the same time, tensions surrounding the Strait of Hormuz have continued to intensify after Iran moved to restrict traffic through the strategic waterway in response to US-Israeli aggression.

The report added that international and regional pressure to secure the agreement and prevent further escalation continues to intensify as energy markets and shipping routes remain exposed to the risk of wider conflict.

“A few words or sentence even on a ‘locked in’ MOU is unlikely to give him everything he wants,” CNN wrote, referring to Trump’s efforts to present the agreement as a diplomatic breakthrough.

[…]

Via https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/iran-tv-shows-details-of-unofficial-preliminary-us-iran-mou

Entertaining During Islamic Golden Age

Ziryab the musician: Ziryab an influencer from Baghdad, Zyriab studied ...

Ziryab:Inventor of 3-course meal

Episode 18 – Entertaining in the Time of the Abassids

Islamic Golden Age (2017)

By Eamon Gearon

Film Review

Europe inherited the concept of a three-course meal from eight century Baghdad via European links with Cordoba (in modern day Spain).

At present, most of our information on Islamic banqueting comes from cook and musician Ziryab (789-957 AD), who published cookbooks featuring recipes, poems, and advice about wine selection and etiquette.

Ziryab was born a Kurdish slave in either Persia or Africa. After studying with the best musicians, he obtained a job at the caliph’s palace composing, performing and teaching music. After obtaining his freedom in 813 AD, he left Baghdad to work for the Umayyed caliph Abdul Rachman in Cordoba. He established a palace orchestra with 100 instruments, as well as a music school, while simultaneously acquiring loping expertise in cooking and fashion design. In addition to the three course meal, he’s credited for introducing toothpaste, deodorant, crystal glassware and tablecloths to Europe.

We also have books from that era by doctors of all three Abrahamic religions warning against overeating.

The pre-Islamic Arabic diet consisted of dates, barley, dairy (and meat for those who could afford it). During the Islamic golden age, the urban poor accessed food by going begging to their wealthier neighbors. On holy days, the caliph held beggars banquets.

At his own banquets for the nobility, a single course could feature 300 dishes. The first course was usually soup. The second included meat or fowl that could be fried, boiled in stew with lentils, grilled or baked in a tandoori oven. Rice, noodles and cheese were added to stews and vegetables, such as asparagus, eggplant and cucumber were served as a side dish. The third course could include rice pudding, lemon sorbet, fruit in syrup or honey, pastry dipped in honey and chopped nuts and dates.

During the caliph’s banquets, guests could be entertained by as many as 100 musicians. Al-KindI (born 800 AD – see The Baghdad House of Wisdom’s Lead Translators: Ibn Izhaqand and Al Kindi/) and al-Ghazali (1058-1111AD) wrote the first books on music theory and music’s therapeutic benefits. The Arabic word for music (“muusiiqaa”) is derived from the Greek word “mousiké,” translated a the “art of the Muses”.

The earliest image of the oud was found on a Mesopotamian cylinder seal dating from 3500-32000 BC. During the Islamic golden age, the oud acquired a fifth string. A modern oud can have as many as 12. The first European oud-playing troubadours appeared in 1100 AD in Aquitaine (southern France). The son of William VIII, duke of Aquitaine, became a troubadour after his father took 100 Andalusians prisoner.

At an official banquet, musicians were followed by storytellers, usually reciting tales from 1001 Nights, a collection of folk tales gathered during the rule of Harun Ashid from India, Persia, Cairo and Baghdad, or “The Three Apples,” the world’s oldest detective story.

 

https://www.kanopy.com/en/pukeariki/watch/video/5756987/5757029

Russia Vows ‘Systematic Strikes’ on Kiev – Foreigners Warned To Leave, Residents Urged To Stay Away From Military, Industrial and Government Sites

By Paul Serran

After Ukraine killed 21 students in a college dorm in Luhansk oblast, Russia retaliated yesterday (24) with a massive combined drone-missile attack on Kiev.

The strikes on Ukraine’s capital were one of the heaviest in the war, and even the new hypersonic Oreshnik (‘Hazel’) missile was used.

But that was not the full extent of Moscow’s retribution, as it warned of ‘systematic strikes’ on military targets in Kiev.

RT reported:

“The [Foreign] ministry made the statement on Monday, a day after a large-scale retaliatory strike on Kiev, prompted by the drone attack on the college in the Lugansk People’s Republic. The Ukrainian strike killed at least 21 people in their dormitory, mainly teenage girls.

The Starobelsk attack has become yet another testament to ‘the Nazi and terrorist nature of the Kiev regime, which deliberately targets civilians and does not hesitate to murder children in cold blood’, the ministry said, warning that Moscow is shifting its approach to the Ukraine conflict.

‘This was the last straw. Under these circumstances, the Russian Armed Forces will be launching systematic strikes against the Ukrainian military-industrial complex in Kiev, including locations where UAVs are designed, manufactured, programmed, and prepared for use’, the ministry said, adding that the campaign will also affect ‘decision-making centers and command posts.”

[…]

Via https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/05/russia-vows-systematic-strikes-kiev-foreigners-warned-leave/

How Western intelligence Agencies Built the Global Jihadist Network

depositphotos 609078652 l

by | May 26, 2026

Americans have been fed a comforting fairy tale about Islamic terrorism. Radical jihadists attack the West simply because they despise freedom, democracy, and the American way of life. This narrative flatters domestic audiences while conveniently obscuring a far more troubling reality. For decades, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Israel have armed, financed, tolerated, and tapped into Sunni Islamist extremists as geopolitical tools to destabilize rivals. The evidence spans multiple theaters and rests on declassified documents, congressional investigations, and credible investigative journalism.

The most thoroughly documented case is Operation Cyclone, the CIA program to arm and finance the Afghan mujahideen from 1979 to 1992. In a 1998 interview with Le Nouvel Observateur, former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski confirmed that the CIA began aiding mujahideen opponents of the pro-Soviet Kabul government six months before the Soviet invasion—a calculated provocation intended to draw Moscow into an unwinnable war. When asked if he regretted supporting Islamic fundamentalism that gave “arms and advice to future terrorists,” Brzezinski replied:

“What is more important in world history? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some agitated Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?”

Multiple intelligence agencies participated in this operation. MI6 ran covert operations supporting hardline commanders. Pakistan’s ISI served as the critical financial and logistical conduit—operating under the direction of Pakistani President Zia ul-Haq, who controlled ISI policy throughout the war. Saudi Arabia agreed to match CIA contributions dollar for dollar, a commitment secured when Brzezinski visited Riyadh in February 1980 and one that CIA officer Gust Avrakotos and congressman Charlie Wilson (D-TX) would fly to Riyadh to enforce whenever Saudi payments fell behind. Historian Steve Coll documented in Ghost Wars that Osama bin Laden informally cooperated with ISI-run guerrilla training camps on behalf of newly arrived Arab jihadists, with intimate connections to CIA-backed commander Jalaluddin Haqqani. The global jihadist network that became al-Qaeda grew directly from this infrastructure.

The Afghan theater was not an isolated experiment but the opening chapter of a longer story. The same networks it created spread rapidly to the next front. The Chechen insurgency of the 1990s was joined by Arab and Central Asian jihadists who had cut their teeth in Afghanistan. The most prominent was Ibn Khattab, a Saudi-born mujahideen veteran born in 1969 inʿAr’ar, Saudi Arabia, who left for the Afghan jihad at age 18 before entering Chechnya in 1995. Saudi-backed organizations funneled funds, and Gulf state charities developed during the Afghan jihad maintained, in some cases wittingly and in others not, support for al-Qaeda-affiliated groups throughout the decade. Several of the future 9/11 conspirators—including Mohamed Atta, Marwan al-Shehhi, Ziad Jarrah, and Ramzi bin al-Shibh—originally sought to travel to Chechnya in 1999 before being redirected to al-Qaeda’s Afghan camps, per the 9/11 Commission.

While the Chechen theater illustrated how Western-cultivated networks could spiral beyond control, Washington was already running new variations of the same playbook elsewhere. Veteran investigative journalist Seymour Hersh’s 2007 New Yorker article “The Redirection” documented that the W. Bush administration, in cooperation with Saudi Arabia, launched covert operations to weaken Hezbollah and Iran by bolstering Sunni factions. According to Hersh’s intelligence sources, “a by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda.”

Israel was running its own parallel operations against Iran during the same period. Foreign Policy magazine published a 2012 report by journalist Mark Perry drawn from CIA memoranda, describing how Israeli Mossad officers posed as CIA agents to recruit members of Jundallah, a Pakistan-based Sunni Salafi organization responsible for numerous bombings inside Iran. As one intelligence official told Perry:

“It’s amazing what the Israelis thought they could get away with. Their recruitment activities were nearly in the open.”

The same structural logic that shaped Afghanistan, Chechnya, and the Middle East has also played out in Central Asia. The Chinese government has accused the United States of using Uyghur Islamist networks to destabilize Xinjiang, with Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian repeatedly alleging American support for Uyghur militant organizations during 2020 and 2021. The U.S.-funded National Endowment for Democracy has provided grants to Uyghur exile organizations. NED co-founder Allen Weinstein acknowledged in a 1991 Washington Post column by David Ignatius that “a lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA.” In October 2020, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo formally revoked the designation of the East Turkestan Islamic Movement as a terrorist organization—a move Beijing characterized as evidence of Western support for Uyghur militancy.

Across Afghanistan, Chechnya, the Middle East, and Xinjiang, the same structural features recur. Western strategic interests converge with the short-term utility of Sunni Islamist networks. Operations route through intermediaries like Saudi Arabia, Pakistan’s ISI, or Gulf states, allowing Washington to maintain official distance. Blowback eventually arrives years later, paid in American blood.

The naive story about terrorists hating freedom serves domestic propaganda purposes while obscuring a far darker truth: Western intelligence agencies have functioned as architects of mayhem, generating instability abroad in pursuit of American primacy. If the world wants genuine stability, it must first acknowledge this pattern and demand that these agencies be held accountable for the chaos they have unleashed across multiple decades.

[…]

Via https://libertarianinstitute.org/articles/how-western-intelligence-agencies-built-the-global-jihadist-network/

Canada Demands Israel Flotilla Abuse Probe

Canada demands Israel flotilla abuse probe

RT

26 May 2026

Ottawa appears to be the first government to formally seek an independent investigation into the May 18-19 detentions

he Canadian government has called for an independent investigation into Israel’s “appalling” treatment of activists aboard the Gaza-bound flotilla.

Prime Minister Mark Carney said Monday that “the protection of all civilians and respect for human dignity must be upheld everywhere, at all times,” according to a government readout of his call with Israeli President Isaac Herzog.

Canadian Foreign Minister Anita Anand said Israel’s denial of consular access to detainees violated the Vienna Convention, an international treaty requiring countries to allow detained foreign nationals to contact their diplomatic officials. Ottawa had provided West Jerusalem with evidence of abuse and expected “those responsible to be held accountable,” she wrote on X on Monday.

The diplomatic clash follows Israel’s interception of the flotilla in international waters on May 18-19 and the detention of hundreds of activists attempting to deliver aid to Gaza. National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir later released footage showing detainees kneeling with their hands restrained behind their backs while he mocked them on camera.

Activists later alleged beatings, the use of tasers, sexual assault, humiliation, stress positions, and the denial of food, water, and consular access during detention. Israel has denied the allegations.

Canada appears to be the first government to formally call for an independent investigation into the detentions, while multiple countries have condemned the interception of the flotilla and allegations of abuse against activists.

Canada’s response is particularly notable, given its longstanding support for Israel. Ottawa recognized Israel shortly after its creation in 1948, has frequently backed it diplomatically at the UN, and has developed extensive trade, security, and intelligence ties over decades. Former Prime Minister Stephen Harper famously told Israel’s parliament in 2014: “Through fire and water, Canada will stand with you.”

Israel claims the blockade of Gaza is necessary to prevent weapons from getting into the enclave. It has also denied withholding supplies from Palestinians in Gaza, almost 2 million of whom have been displaced since the outbreak of the conflict between Israel and Hamas in October 2023.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/640584-canada-demands-israel-flotilla-abuse/

West planning to use former ISIS militants against Iran

West planning to use former ISIS militants against Iran – FSB chief

RT

Western spy agencies are intending to use Syrian militants as a proxy force against Iran, Russian Federal Security Service chief Aleksandr Bortnikov has said.

The jihadists, who fought for Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS) and other terrorist groups, are being moved from their detention facilities in Syria to special camps in Iraq, Bortnikov said during a meeting of the security chiefs from the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) in Russia’s Irkutsk Region on Tuesday.

“The history of Islamic State began with similar Iraqi prison complexes under the protection of Western coalition intelligence agencies,” he stressed.

The CIS was established in 1991, following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, to promote economic, political and security cooperation between members. It currently includes nine nations: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan, Moldova, and Uzbekistan.

The actions of Western spy agencies also pose a danger to the members of the organization as the released militants, “include individuals from CIS countries who fought in the Islamic State and other terrorist groups and later ended up in Syrian prisons,” Bortnikov warned. They can be used not only across the Middle East, but also in their home countries, he added.

“Undoubtedly, the escalation of the Iranian conflict and the involvement of an increasing number of parties in it is threatening to destabilize the entire Islamic world,” the FSB chief stressed.

Indirect negotiations are currently ongoing between the US and Iran amid a fragile truce, which was established in early April after a month of intense hostilities initiated by the Americans and the Israelis. Meanwhile, Tehran continues to prevent the ships of Washington’s allies from sailing through the Strait of Hormuz, which accounts for some 25% of the global crude oil trade, while the US maintains its own blockade of Iranian ports.

On Monday, Iran’s top negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi reportedly arrived in Doha for talks with Qatar’s prime minister on a potential peace deal with the US.

However, both sides downplayed hopes of a swift breakthrough, with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying that Washington was willing to give diplomacy a chance before deciding whether to deal with Iran in “another way.”

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said on Monday that the fact that the sides were able to reach common ground on some issue “does not mean that the signing of an agreement is imminent.”

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/640587-could-iran-cut-off-internet/

Could Iran cut off the world’s internet access?

RT

©  Mehmet Yaren Bozgun / Anadolu via Getty Images

By Farhad Ibragimov

May 26, 2026

Iranian Armed Forces operational command Spokesman Ebrahim Zolfaghari has recently announced that Iran intends to charge fees for the use of undersea cables passing through the Strait of Hormuz. While this news didn’t come as a surprise, it certainly heightened tensions surrounding the digital infrastructure of the Persian Gulf.

Since May 18, the Persian Gulf Strait Authority has controlled the situation in the Strait of Hormuz. This new body was established by the Supreme National Security Council of Iran and is responsible for monitoring compliance with the maritime rules set by Tehran. It was created in response to the US-initiated naval blockade that began in April.

The entire Strait of Hormuz, including its underwater infrastructure, is now viewed by Tehran as part of its jurisdiction and an area of its strategic control.

Even before the current escalation, however, discussions about undersea internet cables in the Strait of Hormuz had surfaced in Iranian media. The topic first emerged in July 2019 during a broadcast on the state-controlled IRIB television and radio network. At that time, an expert claimed that a disruption of cables in the Strait of Hormuz could potentially affect up to 70% of the world’s internet traffic.

While this figure seems exaggerated – since the global web has backup routes and much of the transit between Europe and Asia relies on other pathways like the Red Sea, Egypt, and the Mediterranean – the statement itself is quite significant.

Even if global internet service isn’t paralyzed in the event of major damage to the cables, countries in the Arabian Peninsula would face severe communication disruptions, reduced bandwidth, increased latency, and failures of digital services.

Back in 2019, the Arab nations dismissed these warnings as fanciful Persian tales. But they may have been wrong.

The expert opinion expressed in 2019 was not an official statement by the Iranian government about an intention to cut the cables. It only pointed to the potential vulnerabilities of the cables in the Strait of Hormuz and the international ramifications in case of a significant regional escalation. Thus, already at that time, Iran viewed the undersea digital infrastructure in the Strait of Hormuz as a potential tool for strategic leverage.

The question of whether Iran is indeed prepared to cut internet cables in the Strait of Hormuz should be viewed not as an isolated technical issue, but as part of Tehran’s broader strategy to exert pressure around this vital waterway.

For Iran, subsea digital infrastructure now serves as a new lever alongside oil, tanker traffic, ports, and energy logistics. However, there is a fundamental difference between pointing out vulnerabilities and physically destroying the cables.

In 2026, Iran returned to the topic of undersea internet cables, raising the issue to a new level. On April 22, Tasnim news agency, which is linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), published a report mapping the cable and cloud infrastructure of the Persian Gulf. Essentially, this served as a warning that Tehran may view the Gulf states’ digital infrastructure as part of the conflict zone. The report emphasized that the Gulf monarchies rely on maritime internet routes much more heavily than Iran itself does.

In May 2026, this idea evolved into a more developed political and economic concept. Iranian state media started pushing the narrative that Iran could charge foreign tech companies for utilizing the undersea cables that run through the Strait of Hormuz. This was not merely a question of fees; it also entailed regulatory oversight, requiring operators and major technology firms to adhere to Iranian regulations, as well as efforts to monopolize cable maintenance and repair services.

From a military perspective, Iran has the capability to threaten cable infrastructure: the Strait of Hormuz is quite shallow, maritime traffic is dense, and the cables are physically vulnerable to damage. Most damage to subsea cables occurs not from sabotage but from anchors, fishing gear, and navigational errors. Thus, there is a real possibility that these cables may become damaged. When it comes to physical interference rather than a precise cyberattack, the vulnerabilities of such infrastructure are evident.

Economically, Iran can assert its right to charge for the use of subsea cables within its maritime jurisdiction. According to international maritime law, coastal states have the authority to regulate the installation and maintenance of such infrastructure near their shores. This is why Tehran views the cables not just as  part of an international communication network but as an object under its control.

The political ramifications of such actions or the deliberate severing of cables would be substantial for Iran. Such a move would likely be perceived by the US, the Gulf nations, and major tech companies not as a ‘symmetrical response’ but as an attack on critical international infrastructure.

Moreover, executing such an operation discreetly would be exceedingly difficult for Iran, as the area is under constant military surveillance, and any blatant act of sabotage would give Tehran’s adversaries ample reason for a severe retaliatory response. For this reason, attempting to physically cut cables in the Strait of Hormuz would be an extremely risky maneuver for Iran, and would effectively escalate the conflict to a new level.

Seven primary communication systems run along the seabed of the Strait of Hormuz; however, they branch out into about 17 distinct cable lines. Some serve mainly regional purposes: the FALCON system connects India with Oman, Iran, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and extends to Egypt, while the Ooredoo Gulf Pathway manages a significant portion of digital traffic within the Persian Gulf. Other cable systems are strategically vital, including the SEA-ME-WE 5, linking Southeast Asia with the Middle East and Europe, and TGN-Gulf, connecting Gulf nations’ infrastructure with India and global networks, including the US.

The security of these cables cannot be ensured without military force. The cable infrastructure is extensive, runs along the seabed, and is physically exposed. However, as recent months have shown, neither side is eager to place their military vessels at risk.

Repairing damaged cables presents its own set of challenges. Restoring a severed cable necessitates the deployment of specialized ships to the area and that their safe operation is ensured. In the context of military tensions, this quickly transforms from an engineering issue into a political and military one.

Without Tehran’s direct or at least tacit consent, repair efforts in the strait may prove impossible. This situation turns the threat of damage to the cables into a tool for leveraging power, since in addition to the disruption of traffic, the repair process may be complicated.

Damage to undersea cables in the Strait of Hormuz could impact not only internet speed but also the region’s connectivity with major global IT platforms. A significant portion of the digital infrastructure, including cloud services, data centers, corporate platforms, and financial systems, relies on international data transmission routes.

Disruptions in communication with Southern Europe – home to major data centers for AWS, Microsoft, and other cloud service providers – could be particularly sensitive. If data traffic from the Gulf countries needs to be urgently redirected through alternative routes, the process would put additional strain on other parts of the network. Consequently, users might experience delays, reduced speeds, unstable service quality, and interruptions in access to cloud platforms.

Predicting which specific services will suffer the most is nearly impossible in advance. Information about land-based communication lines, backup routes, and actual traffic redistribution schemes is typically not publicly available. Therefore, the repercussions will depend not only on how many cables are affected but also on how swiftly operators can reroute the traffic.

Generally, one damaged cable doesn’t trigger widespread internet collapse; traffic can be redistributed through backup routes. However, if multiple cables fail simultaneously, it would cause a drop in internet service quality. In the Gulf countries, this could impact banking operations, digital government services, cloud platforms, corporate communications, messaging apps, and logistics systems.

On a global scale, services like Telegram are unlikely to cease functioning entirely. However, in certain Gulf nations, this would cause problems: messages may be delayed, the connection could become unstable, and in the event of serious damage to several cables, access to specific services might be temporarily disrupted.

It is most likely that instead of actually damaging the cables, Iran will use the threat of such a possibility as a lever of influence. It suffices for Tehran to mention the possibility that these cables could become targets. This already alters market behavior: operators factor in added risks, repair ships proceed more cautiously in the conflict zone, Gulf countries reevaluate backup routes, and investors assess the region’s vulnerabilities not just in terms of oil but also digital infrastructure.

Meanwhile, the consequences of physical damage to the cables would differ based on the region. This wouldn’t cause a global internet blackout; there are alternative routes in place, and transit between Europe and Asia relies on various paths. However, for the Gulf states, the impact would be far more severe, affecting banking operations, cloud services, data centers, logistics, and digital government platforms. The greatest danger lies not in a single incident, but rather in a prolonged disruption and a situation in which repair ships would not be able to operate safely in the conflict zone.

Undersea cables remain primarily a means of strategic coercion for Iran – a way to demonstrate that responses to blockades or military pressure could extend beyond the oil market to digithttps://www.rt.com/news/640587-could-iran-cut-off-internet/al infrastructure as well. Physically cutting the cables would be a last resort, possible only done in the event of significant escalation – however, in the logic of its current pressure strategy, it wouldn’t be the most rational move for Iran.

Trump demands Arab states normalize with Iran in return for ceasefire

US President Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump has told several Arab and Muslim leaders that he expects them to establish formal relations with Israel in exchange for a ceasefire deal with Iran to end the war, according to American officials.

Axios, citing the officials, said that Trump made the demand during a phone conversation on Saturday with leaders from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, Jordan, and Bahrain.

According to the same sources, all eight leaders expressed support for the potential agreement with Tehran during the call.

“We are with you on this deal,” one official was quoted as telling Trump, according to the report.

Another official familiar with the conversation said the US president indicated that he would next speak with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and hoped to bring him into a joint call with the same group of Arab and Muslim leaders in the future.

Trump also pushed those countries that have not yet joined the so-called Abraham Accords – a series of 2020 US-brokered normalization deals with Israel signed under the Trump administration – to do so and establish formal ties with the Tel Aviv regime, the officials added.

Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Pakistan currently maintain no official diplomatic relations with Israel.

One of the officials told Axios that there was “silence on the line” after Trump’s demand, prompting the president to joke and ask “if they are still there.”

The development comes as indirect talks between Tehran and Washington, mediated by Pakistan and facilitated by Qatar, continue based on the Islamic Republic’s 14-point proposal to reach a memorandum aimed at putting an end to the US-Israeli war on Iran.

Speaking in a televised interview on Saturday, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said Iran and the United States have edged closer to finalizing the 14-point memorandum to end the imposed war, halt American maritime aggression, and secure the release of Iran’s blocked assets.

He emphasized that Iran’s focus at this stage remains exclusively on ending the US-Israel war based on its proposal, which has been shuttled back and forth several times.

The criminal US-Israeli aggression against Iran began on February 28 with airstrikes that assassinated senior Iranian officials and commanders, including Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei.

Iranian Armed Forces responded by launching daily missile and drone operations targeting locations in the Israeli-occupied territories as well as US military bases and assets across the region.

Furthermore, Iran retaliated against the strikes by closing the Strait of Hormuz, which resulted in a significant increase in oil prices and its by-products.

On April 8, forty days into the war, a Pakistan-brokered temporary ceasefire between Iran and the US took effect.

Negotiations ensued in the Pakistani capital, Islamabad, but stopped short of an agreement amid Washington’s maximalist demands and insistence on unreasonable positions.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/05/25/769236/Iran-US-Arab-Trump-Israel-normalization