September 18, 2026 By Egberto Willies
Summary
Karl Rove, the Republican strategist who helped build the modern Texas GOP, says he will vote for Democrat Jon Rosenthal for the Texas Railroad Commission. It will be his first vote for a Democrat since 1994. Rove made the break after Republican nominee Bo French posted an image of nonwhite University of Texas students and portrayed their presence as a problem. Rove called French a bigot and later described the post as part of “a long and ugly pattern.”
- Rove says he will support Rosenthal, a Democratic state representative and petroleum engineer, over French in the November Railroad Commission election.
- The vote does not represent a general party switch. Rove presented it as a candidate-specific rejection of French and a call to remove people he believes are damaging the Republican Party.
- French’s post used the appearance of South Asian and Latino students celebrating a University of Texas football victory to imply that foreigners had displaced Texans.
- Reporting found that students pictured in the post were American citizens; UT also admits the overwhelming majority of its undergraduate class is from Texas high schools.
- The controversy has shifted attention to an agency that regulates oil and gas—not railroads—and to the candidates’ qualifications, conduct, and approach to public oversight.
Rove’s decision matters because it comes from an architect of Republican power in Texas. It does not erase his role in building that power, but it documents a rare public limit: he says racial and nativist attacks should disqualify a Republican nominee from receiving his vote.
Premium Content (Complimentary)
Karl Rove’s Democratic Vote Exposes a Texas Republican Breaking Point
Karl Rove helped turn Texas into a Republican stronghold. That history gives unusual political weight to his announcement that he will vote for Democrat Jon Rosenthal for the Texas Railroad Commission. Rove says it will be only the second Democratic vote of his life and his first since he supported Bob Bullock in 1994. The decision is narrow, explicit, and rooted in Republican nominee Bo French’s conduct.
French ignited the controversy after the University of Texas defeated Ohio State. He posted a photograph of jubilant Longhorn fans—many of them appearing to be South Asian or Latino—and suggested their presence reflected a worsening problem. He later framed the issue as foreigners displacing Americans and Texans at the university. Reporting subsequently identified students in the image as American citizens. The attack therefore rested on appearance: French treated brown skin as evidence that young people did not belong.
Rove rejected that message directly. At an Austin luncheon, he reportedly called French a “bigot.” In his subsequent column, he placed the episode within “a long and ugly pattern” and announced that he would support Rosenthal. Rove’s point was not that he had embraced the Democratic Party or abandoned conservative policy. He argued that figures like French were diminishing the Republican Party and that its “stables need a cleaning.” That distinction matters because accurate analysis should not inflate one protest vote into a full ideological conversion.
The break remains significant. Rove was central to George W. Bush’s rise and to the Republican consolidation of statewide power in Texas. When a strategist with that record refuses party loyalty in a statewide race, he highlights a boundary that many elected Republicans have struggled or declined to enforce. His decision also demonstrates that voters can judge a candidate’s conduct independently of the letter beside the candidate’s name.
The episode carries an additional irony. French used a photograph of students celebrating a Texas victory to question whether they belonged in Texas. Those students were participating in one of the state’s most recognizable communal rituals. Their clothes, cheers, and school allegiance displayed integration into university and state life. French converted that scene into a racial test and then used immigration rhetoric to defend the inference.
The office at stake also deserves attention. Despite its name, the Texas Railroad Commission regulates the state’s oil and gas industry, including drilling, pipeline safety, and the plugging of abandoned wells. Rosenthal is a state representative and a mechanical engineer who spent decades in the energy industry. The campaign should therefore examine regulatory competence, environmental stewardship, worker and community safety, grid-related infrastructure and whether the commission serves the public rather than merely the industry it oversees.
Rove’s intervention does not settle that policy debate, nor does his reputation make his judgment authoritative. It does, however, change the political context. A prominent Republican is telling habitual Republican voters that supporting a Democrat can be an appropriate response when their party nominates someone whose public message targets Texans based on perceived ethnicity.
The central lesson extends beyond one endorsement. Political parties shape incentives through what they reward, excuse, and condemn. If racialized attacks generate publicity, fundraising and institutional silence, candidates learn to repeat them. If voters cross party lines in response, those incentives can change. Rove’s vote represents one such response. The election will determine whether a broader group of Texans agrees.
[…]
The Most Revolutionary Act 