More Research Evidence that Butter is Good for You

Posted: February 13, 2017 in Uncategorized

A team of medical researchers have some good news for those who cook with butter but consider it a guilty pleasure: It might actually be good for you. While the findings, published this week in the British Medical Journal, are not conclusive, they are compelling: researchers with the University of North Carolina’s School of Medicine (UNC) analyzed a 50-year-old unpublished study out of Minnesota and found reason to believe that cooking with corn oil instead of butter may actually be worse for heart health. It’s an idea that, if one day proven, would upend the conventional nutrition wisdom of the last several decades.

In the last year, a growing number of voices within the nutrition community have been making the case that low-processed fatty foods aren’t as bad for you as once thought. It’s an argument that has shown up in studies from around the world and also in articles challenging national policy decisions based on the idea that fat should be avoided.

In the case of butter versus vegetable oil, the UNC team analyzed unpublished nutritional datagathered between 1968 and 1973 in a controlled study that included more than 9,400 men andwomen in one nursing home and six state mental hospitals in Minnesota.The subjects were broken into two groups. One was given a diet in which liquid corn oil was used in place of usual hospital cooking fats (including butter and hydrogenated oils) duringmeal preparation. The other group received meals cooked with common margarines andshortening. Roughly 57% of the 517 subjects that died during the course of the study underwent post-mortem examinations of their hearts, aortas, and brains. But no analysis of the data had been published until now. . .

via There’s a growing body of evidence that butter is actually good for you — Quartz

Comments
  1. marblenecltr says:

    There should be a study with use of butter but with no hydrogenated oils.

  2. swo8 says:

    Butter tastes so much better too.
    Leslie

  3. Well, I certainly hope those ‘subjects’ were asked for their consent before being divided into test groups. But then again, I already know the answer to that!

  4. Fortunately a lot has changed since 1973. After the Senate reviewed the infamous Tuskagee syphilis experiments in the early 1970s, there was federal legislation passed requiring that all human research be approved by ethical review boards. The review board has to approve all elements of the experimental design including obtaining informed consent from subjects regarding potential risks.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s