Critics Still See Holes in US ‘Evidence’ of Russian Election Interference

Posted: December 31, 2016 in Uncategorized

*
*

Like the Bush administration’s claims of Iraqi [weapons of mass destruction], the charges that Russia ‘hacked’ the presidential election in November have not been established beyond secret intelligence sources.

Journal of People

by Deirdre Fulton, staff writer

Common Dreams | 30 December, 2016

On Thursday, the DHS and FBI released a report on alleged Russian election interference, dubbed GRIZZLY STEPPE. (Screenshot)

As the U.S. expels 35 Russian diplomats over hacking charges, critics say the so-called evidence released Thursday alongside President Barack Obama’s sanctions is an insufficient response to calls for hard proof of the allegations.

View original post 604 more words

Comments
  1. When truth is classified, trust withers.

    Dr. Bramhall, thanks for keeping us informed of important issues that affect our lives. Wishing you all the best in the New Year. Our struggle continues.

    • Too, true, Rosaliene, about trust being impossible when the truth is concealed from us because revealing it would threaten national security.

      Thanks for the New Years wishes – same to you.

  2. Schlüter says:

    „US Allegations Against Russia: Hold the Thief! (in addition to the previous post)“: https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2016/12/18/us-allegations-against-russia-hold-the-thief-in-addition-to-the-previous-post/
    Have a good and vigilant 2017!
    Regards

    • It is really ironic, isn’t it, Schluter, for the US to (falsely) complain about foreign interference in their elections – when they’ve spent more than seven decades trying to rig other countries’ elections.

  3. lozzafun says:

    A disclaimer??… During a press conference with Pres BUsh, a reporter disproved some info he was peddling (with facts), He stated that he was not the creator of the info just the messenger… Then he laughed and said that maybe they should include disclaimers with the reports… lol.. Maybe they are finally taking his advice??

  4. I myself found it quite weird that the intelligence document on which all the new sanctions are based should carry a disclaimer. I had no idea that the notion of having a disclaimer originated with Bush.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s