Trump threatens to ‘shoot and kill’ Iranian mine-laying boats in Strait of Hormuz

US to ‘shoot and kill’ Iranian mine-laying boats in Strait of Hormuz – Trump

RT

 24 Apr, 2026 17:02

The US president claims to have “total control” of the waterway amid stalled talks

US President Donald Trump has threatened lethal force against any Iranian boats suspected of laying mines in the Strait of Hormuz, claiming that Washington now has “total control” over the key waterway until Tehran agrees to a deal.

The warning comes amid a maritime standoff in the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial transit route that accounts for approximately 20% of global oil and gas flows. Traffic has largely come to a standstill following the US-Israeli campaign against Iran and Tehran’s subsequent retaliation.

Despite the fragile ceasefire that Trump extended indefinitely earlier this week, the US has maintained its blockade of Iranian ports.

“I have ordered the United States Navy to shoot and kill any boat … that is putting mines in the waters of the Strait of Hormuz,” Trump wrote in a social media post late on Thursday, adding that US mine-sweeping operations are ongoing.

According to the Washington Post, the Pentagon has suggested that clearing suspected mines in the strait could take months.

Trump claimed the US has “total control” over the strait. “No ship can enter or leave without the approval of the United States Navy. It is ‘Sealed up Tight,’ until such time as Iran is able to make a DEAL!!!” he wrote.

Tehran has pushed back, saying it has “the right” to act in the waterway if its national security is threatened and making the lifting of US restrictions a condition for resuming talks.

Tensions in the strait have escalated following recent maritime incidents. This week, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) released footage showing the interception of two container ships in the waterway, while US forces have reported stopping and redirecting multiple vessels they described as suspected of violating sanctions.

Trump has made clear there is no firm timeline for ending the war, telling Fox News on Wednesday that there was “no time frame.”  He claimed that US strikes hit “75% of targets” inside Iran and that any Iranian military buildup during the ceasefire could be neutralized “in about one day.”

The Hormuz disruption has rattled global markets, pushing Brent crude above $100 per barrel. International Energy Agency head Fatih Birol warned of “the biggest energy security threat in history,” while aid groups flagged risks to global food security as fertilizer and agricultural supply chains are hit.

Tehran’s ambassador to Moscow, Kazem Jalali, told RT that Iran is not seeking war but is ready to respond, insisting the country remains open to diplomacy despite the escalation.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/639021-trump-hormuz-iranian-boats-warning/

China Urges Citizens to Leave Iran “As Soon As Possible” Citing ‘Complex and Volatile’ Situation

China Urges Citizens to Leave Iran “As Soon As Possible”  Citing 'Complex and Volatile' Situation

Brian Shilhavy

China Urges Citizens to Leave Iran “As Soon As Possible” Citing ‘Complex and Volatile’ Situation

No western media from what I can see has covered this. The last time China issued a similar warning, it was a day before bombing started.

https://www.arabtimesonline.com/news/china-urges-citizens-to-leave-iran-as-soon-as-possible-citing-complex-and-volatile-situation/

Follow @zeeemedia
Website (https://zeeemedia.com/new-interview-page/) | X (https://twitter.com/zeee_media?lang=en) | Instagram (https://www.instagram.com/maria.zeee/?hl=en) | Rumble (https://rumble.com/user/ZeeeMedia)

Via https://t.me/healthimpact/3493

US-pirated ship carried vital kidney dialysis supplies

A screenshot of a video posted by US Central Command on Sunday purportedly shows a US Navy destroyer near an Iranian-flagged cargo ship in the Arabian Sea.

Press TV

The Iranian Red Crescent Society says a commercial vessel pirated by US forces near Iran’s coastline in the Sea of Oman was carrying vital raw materials needed to produce medical supplies for kidney dialysis patients, warning that disruption of the shipment could threaten lives.

The US forces targeted the vessel on Sunday in a blatant act of piracy, boarding the ship and disabling its navigation systems.

The supplies belong to Saha Medical Equipment Company, a subsidiary of the Iranian Red Crescent, the organization said in a statement on Thursday.

Part of the ship’s cargo, it said, consisted of raw materials required to produce consumable medical supplies for dialysis patients.

“Any disruption in the supply of these critical items could directly threaten the health and lives of patients in need of dialysis services,” the Red Crescent warned.

The Red Crescent added that the US action, which it said created threats and intimidation and endangered the lives of civilian crew members, contradicted fundamental principles of humanitarian law, including the principles of distinction and precaution in military operations.

It said the act could violate international obligations regarding the maintenance of peace and stability and could be examined as an instance of unlawful use of force under UN General Assembly Resolution 3314 (1974).

Iranian forces struck back immediately following the US piracy, targeting several American military vessels in the area with drone attacks, according to Iran’s military.

The armed forces of the Islamic Republic were ready to deal decisively with the American aggressor forces, but the presence of sailors’ families aboard the targeted Iranian cargo ship prevented immediate action, as ensuring the safety of civilians took precedence over retaliation, Tehran stated.

The military added that as soon as the safety of the families and crew was assured, Iran’s armed forces would take necessary action against what it called the terrorist US Army.

On Wednesday, the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) Navy said it had intercepted and transferred to Iranian territorial waters a ship linked to Israel and another vessel for committing violations in the Strait of Hormuz.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/04/23/767415/Iran-s-Red-Crescent–US-pirated-ship-carried-vital-kidney-dialysis-supplies

Russia threatens to bomb UK with list of potential targets across Europe

Featured image

Imogen Garfinkel

The Kremlin has published a list of ‘potential targets’ in London, Leicester, Reading and Suffolk it claims are making drones for Ukraine.

Also on the list were a number of factories in Germany, Denmark, Latvia, Lithuania, Netherlands, Poland and the Czech Republic, allegedly producing Ukrainian drones, as well as facilities Russia claims is manufacturing components in Germany, Spain, Italy, the Czech Republic, Israel and Turkey.

Dmitry Medvedev, the hawkish deputy head of Russia’s Security Council, followed up with a threat on X, writing: ‘Sleep well, European partners!’

‘Russian Defence Ministry’s statement must be taken literally: the list of European facilities which make drones & other equipment is a list of potential targets for the Russian armed forces.

‘When strikes become a reality depends on what comes next.’

One of the sites listed as a potential UK target is in Mildenhall, Suffolk, which is also the location of an RAF base.

It comes after the Russian military launched hundreds of drones at Ukraine in an overnight raid.

At least 15 people were killed and 90 injured in the attacks, which followed a short ceasefire over Orthodox Easter celebrations at the weekend.

[…]

Via https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/russia-threatens-to-bomb-uk-with-list-of-potential-targets-across-europe/ar-AA211dWW

Shifting to Guerilla Warfare, Hezbollah Delivers Massive Blows to Israel

Hezbollah releases footage of strikes deep inside Israel as operations intensify. (Photo: video grab)

By Robert Inlakesh

All along, this was precisely the scenario that Hezbollah had hoped for, to rope the Israelis in on the ground, in order to eventually inflict enormous losses on them.

Hezbollah has shifted to waging a guerrilla war against the Israeli occupiers in southern Lebanon, reminding Tel Aviv why it decided to withdraw from the country in the year 2000. Instead of allowing Israel to violate the ceasefire unchecked, the responses have been immediate and painful.

On April 16, the White House declared that a 10-Day temporary ceasefire had been reached between Lebanon and Israel. Only the day prior, both Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his Defense Minister Israel Katz had delivered speeches claiming that their operations in the south of Lebanon would continue to expand.

This caused immense frustration amongst the Israeli public and sparked backlash in the Hebrew-language media.

Sure enough, when the ceasefire went into effect, the Israelis decided to violate the agreement at least 10 times within an hour, mainly through artillery fire on Lebanese villages in the south. This was followed by two drone strikes targeting vehicles in southern Lebanon, in addition to an attack on an ambulance.

Israeli Arabic spokesperson Avrechay Adraee, who was supposed to have retired, yet has made a recent return, openly released a video message ordering displaced Lebanese civilians not to return south of the Litani River area. The occupation forces even bombed the area where efforts were being made to reconstruct a temporary bridge that had been deliberately destroyed during the war to prevent civilian passage into the south.

For a period of time, it had been feared that a return to the pre-March “ceasefire” in Lebanon had just been secured in favor of Tel Aviv once again, where the Israelis carried out frequent operations without any response. All of this as Israel was now occupying more territory illegally, as the Lebanese government negotiated for a normalisation agreement.

Hezbollah Secretary General, Sheikh Naim Qassem, then delivered an address, during which he made it clear that the Lebanese leadership was behaving unacceptably and betraying their duties through their normalizing efforts. He also insisted that the previous status quo would not return and that instead his organization would respond to the Israeli violations, fighting until the occupation of South Lebanon was totally abandoned.

Little more than a day into the ceasefire agreement, despite no announcements of retaliatory actions from Hezbollah, a series of “security incidents” were announced by the Israeli Army. The first few were said to have been tanks running over previously planted explosives, making it appear as if the incidents had occurred by accident.

However, three major “security events” occurred, inflicting at least 37 Israeli casualties, 2 of whom the Israelis admitted were deaths. At this point, it had become clear that something else was going on.

Then came an official Hezbollah statement, claiming responsibility for a single incident, where 4 Israeli Merkava tanks were said to have been completely destroyed by pre-planted IEDs, detonating them on an enemy convoy, after Lebanese fighters had been monitoring their movements. After this, the Israeli military decided not to publish any details on the IED attacks.

Yet, Israeli media commentary explained that soldiers, stationed in what is being called a “buffer zone” in southern Lebanon, have reported their frustrations over Hezbollah drones monitoring their movements.

In other words, Hezbollah has cells throughout the territory that Israel claims to be in control of, who do reconnaissance, then calculate the movements of Israeli forces, anticipating their common routes, before planting IEDs that they then detonate on convoys.

Not only is this a transition to asymmetric warfare, which the Iraqi resistance became well known for when fighting an insurgency against US occupying forces, but it is also beginning to usher in flashbacks to the days of the occupation in South Lebanon.

As an example, in 1997, Hezbollah had managed to pull off what was known as the Ansariyeh Ambush, killing 12 Israeli special forces soldiers from its elite Shayetet 13 Unit. This had been carried out through reconnaissance and intelligence work, to anticipate the arrival of the Israeli unit, a total disaster for the Israeli military at the time.

Today, Hezbollah has advanced from what it was in the 1990s and possesses much more sophisticated and powerful weapons. What it means for Israeli forces on the ground is that they must constantly keep moving, as they remain under surveillance and could be subjected to an ambush at any time.

When Israeli tanks travel down roads they have taken a number of times previously, they could suddenly face a series of EIDs. The more these attacks happen, the more terrified the Israeli conscript army’s soldiers become, fearing the possibility that they could at any moment lose an arm, leg, or their life.

Hezbollah, having shifted to such tactics, could also seek to capture Israeli soldiers at one point, something that would represent a catastrophe for the Israeli political leadership.

If such a capture operation succeeds, then Netanyahu’s campaign of triumph will be suddenly transformed into yet another costly operation that will inevitably accelerate on the ground, while eventually forcing him to commit to a prisoner exchange.

All along, this was precisely the scenario that Hezbollah had hoped for, to rope the Israelis in on the ground, in order to eventually inflict enormous losses on them and fulfill the pledge of its former leader, Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah that the south will become a graveyard for the invading army and that they will eventually have no tanks left.

[…]

Via https://www.palestinechronicle.com/shifting-to-guerilla-warfare-hezbollah-delivers-massive-blows-to-israel/

Trump: ‘No time frame’ for ending Iran war

‘No time frame’ for ending Iran war – Trump

The US president reject claims he’s  rushing to end the conflict ahead of midterm elections

According to Donald Trump, the US has set no deadlines for concluding the war against Iran.

The remarks contrast with Trump’s earlier claim, made shortly after the US and Israel launched attacks on Iran on February 28, that the fighting would last “four to five weeks.” He also repeatedly said over the past month that the war would be over “very soon.”

The US president told Fox News on Wednesday that there is “no time frame” and no rush to end the conflict.

“People say I want to get it over because of the midterms, not true,” Trump said.

Trump’s approval rating on the economy has fallen to a new low of 30% as energy shortages caused by the Iran war continue to drive prices higher, according to an AP-NORC poll published earlier this week.

On Tuesday, the president prolonged the ceasefire with Tehran indefinitely, while keeping the US blockade of Iranian ports in place.

The announcement came just hours before the expiration of the two-week truce between the sides. Earlier the same day, Iran opted out of talks with an American delegation in Pakistan, arguing that any discussions are pointless as long as Washington’s “bullying” continues.

Trump told Fox News that there is “no time pressure” when it comes to the ceasefire or setting a new date for talks with Tehran. His goal is to “get a good deal for the American people,” he added.

”The blockade scares [Iran] even more than the bombing,” Trump claimed. “They’ve been bombed for years but the blockade they hate.”

The president also called Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghachi “a smart man,” who will “be there when talks get underway again.”

Iran has said it is prepared to fight the US “until complete victory.” Tehran’s envoy to Beijing, Abdolreza Rahmani Fazli, told RT India earlier this week that there will be no talks until the American blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, which accounts for some 25% of global crude oil trade, continues. What the Americans expect from Iran “is not dialogue, but surrender,” and that is not going to happen, he insisted.

Tehran has further tightened its control of the strait since Trump’s announcement of an indefinite truce, seizing at least two ships and escorting them to Iranian ports, according to a Reuters report on Thursday.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/638952-trump-us-iran-ceasefire/

Leading US Magazine Highlights Final Defeat in Trump’s War on Iran

Protesters stand on an image depicting US President Donald Trump during a gathering to protest the US and Israeli war against Iran, seen in Ankara, Turkey, on March 1, 2026. (Phot by AFP)

Press TV

The strategic aftershocks and long-term consequences of the war of aggression launched by US President Donald Trump and his closest ally, Israel, against Iran will be felt long after the fighting ends, the Foreign Policy magazine says. 

“The immediate costs of the war against Iran are already apparent,” the magazine, a leading publication for serious discussion of global affairs and American foreign policy, said.

Even with a fragile ceasefire largely holding and talks between the parties scheduled to resume, oil and gas prices have risen sharply. The Washington-based International Monetary Fund (IMF) is now warning of a possible global recession.

“These near-term effects are significant. But in the long run, they may pale in comparison to the deeper strategic aftershocks that will result from this conflict,” the magazine wrote.

According to the Foreign Policy, wars can act as geopolitical earthquakes, accelerating global shifts, creating new realities, and reverberating for years after the guns fall silent.

“The war against Iran is precisely such an earthquake and the United States and the world will be living with its strategic consequences for years to come,” it said.

US President Donald Trump’s popularity has plummeted since he launched this unprovoked aggression against Iran. The magazine said the war on Iran “delivered a potentially fatal blow to a US-led international order that was already on life support.”

“The United States is now the main threat to the system that it once led,” it added.

By launching a preventive war with no plausible legal basis — neither under domestic nor international law — Washington has helped normalize aggression as a tool for settling disputes between nations, it said.

The writers of the article, Philip H. Gordon, the Sydney Stein Jr. Scholar at the Brookings Institution, and Rebecca Lissner, a senior fellow for US foreign policy at the Council on Foreign Relations, said Trump has normalized the threat of war crimes as both a military tactic and a diplomatic bargaining chip.

He openly threatened to destroy power plants, civilian infrastructure, and even an entire civilization — rhetoric that shocked global opinion, they wrote.

The article also condemned the US blockade of Iranian ports and the strategic Strait of Hormuz. “Trump has helped normalize the weaponization of geographic choke points upon which the global economy depends.”

Irreparable damage to US credibility

The magazine touched on the fallout from the unprovoked terrorist war to Washington’s credibility, saying a future American president may attempt to revive the principles Trump has abandoned, but the “damage is already done.”

“Even after the conflict with Iran subsides, it will be far more difficult for the United States to credibly claim leadership of the international order it once presided over,” it said.

The war has also driven a deep wedge between the United States and its European allies.

“Nor will the United States be able to count on its friends as before following a war that has dealt a body blow to the crumbling foundations of Washington’s global alliances,” the Foreign Policy said.

According to the magazine, NATO is already strained by earlier crises, including Trump’s threats over Greenland, adding the Iran war may now be remembered as the final rupture.

It noted that European leaders were not consulted before the war, and several countries refused to provide naval forces to forcibly reopen the Strait of Hormuz or placed limits on the use of their bases for bombing Iran.

In response, Trump called them “cowards” and threatened to withdraw the United States from NATO.

Whether or not Trump follows through on these threats, the conflict is accelerating Europe’s push toward greater defense autonomy — and possibly even nuclear autonomy, the magazine said.

Broader global repercussions

The war will also have serious implications for US alliances in the Indo-Pacific, it postulated. To sustain its aggression against Iran, Trump was forced to divert a massive share of America’s finite military assets away from the Indo-Pacific theater to West Asia, it said.

“Trump’s reckless war on Iran has not only failed to achieve lasting strategic gains but has actively weakened America’s global position, damaged its alliances, undermined international law, and accelerated the emergence of a more multipolar world.

“The aftershocks will continue to reshape global politics for years to come,” it added.

[…]

IRGC seizes Israeli ship, second vessel for violations in Strait of Hormuz

The MSC-Francesca belongs to the Israeli regime, the IRGC says.

Press TV

The Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) Navy says it has intercepted and transferred to Iranian territorial waters two vessels for having committed violations in the Strait of Hormuz.

In a statement released on Wednesday, the IRGC identified the vessels as the MSC-Francesca, which it said belongs to the Israeli regime, and the Epaminodes.

The vessels, it said, were operating without authorization, committing repeated violations, tampering with navigation aid systems, and endangering maritime security in an attempt to exit the strait covertly.

“With the intelligence dominance of the forces, these vessels were identified and stopped in order to uphold the rights of the noble Iranian nation in the Strait of Hormuz,” the IRGC Navy said.

It added that the vessels have now been transferred to Iranian territorial waters for inspection of their cargo and documents.

The IRGC Navy reiterated that any attempt to disrupt the implementation of laws announced by Iran for transit through the Strait of Hormuz, or any activity inconsistent with safe passage through this strategic waterway, will be continuously monitored and met with decisive and legal action against violators.

The operation came amid ongoing tensions over the US naval blockade of Iranian ports, which Tehran has condemned as an act of aggression and a violation of international law.

Iran has placed special controls on the strategic waterway days after the start of the US-Israeli war on February 28, rolling out a new regulatory framework that requires all vessels to secure authorization before transiting.

A draft bill currently before parliament would codify these rules, including a ban on Israeli‑linked ships, mandatory clearance for vessels from “hostile countries,” and the imposition of transit fees.

The seizures came just hours after US President Donald Trump announced an extension of the ceasefire, even as he confirmed that the US Navy would maintain its maritime blockade of Iranian ports, a move Tehran considers a violation of the ceasefire.

Iran has not requested an extension of the truce and has warned that it could attempt to break the blockade by force if tensions escalate further.

The US-Israeli war of aggression has already caused severe disruption to global shipping, as the Strait, which normally carries 20 million barrels of oil per day, remains largely closed, and energy prices have soared.

The US-Israeli war began with a wave of airstrikes on February 28, including the assassination of Iran’s late Leader, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei.

Iran responded with 100 waves of retaliatory strikes under Operation True Promise 4, launching hundreds of ballistic and hypersonic missiles at American bases across the region and Israeli positions.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/04/22/767348/IRGC-seizes-Israeli-ship,-second-vessel-in-Strait-of-Hormuz

Trump Denied Access to Nuclear Codes

US running out of key weapons

US running out of key weapons – report

RT

22 Apr, 2026 

The American military may not have enough missiles for a future conflict, having used its stockpiles to wage war on Iran, a CSIS analysis warns

The US military has dangerously depleted its stockpiles of critical missiles during the seven‑week war on Iran, creating a “near‑term risk” that could leave it vulnerable in any future conflict, according to a new analysis by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).

The report, published on Tuesday, found that intense combat operations have exhausted a staggering portion of America’s most advanced weaponry, including at least 45% of its inventory of Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM), nearly 50% of its Patriot air defense interceptors, and over half of its Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) missiles. The figures are said to closely align with classified Pentagon assessments.

The depletion is not limited to air defense systems. The analysis estimates that the campaign has also consumed approximately 30% of the US Tomahawk cruise missile stockpile, more than 20% of its long‑range Joint Air‑to‑Surface Standoff Missiles (JASSM), and around 20% of its SM‑3 and SM‑6 interceptors.

While the Pentagon maintains it has enough firepower to continue operations in the Middle East, the CSIS report warns that the drawdown has fundamentally undercut America’s ability to fight a major war elsewhere, particularly against a near‑peer adversary such as China.

The report’s authors warned that rebuilding the arsenals will be a slow and costly process. One of the experts told CNN it would take “one to four years to replenish these inventories and several years after that to expand them to where they need to be.”

Despite the alarming findings, the Pentagon has pushed back, with chief spokesperson Sean Parnell insisting that the US military “has everything it needs to execute at the time and place of the president’s choosing.”

President Donald Trump has also downplayed the issue, claiming the US has a “virtually unlimited” supply of missiles, even as his administration has requested a record-breaking military budget of around $1.5 trillion for the 2027 fiscal year, with much of it dedicated to replenishing stocks.

Earlier this month, the Wall Street Journal reported that the Pentagon had also approached major US car manufacturers General Motors and Ford about redirecting civilian factories towards producing munitions and other military equipment.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/638914-us-missile-stockpiles-depelting/