EMR Radiation From Cell Towers, Wireless Devices Linked to Diabetes Epidemic

cell tower and word "diabetes"
Electromagnetic radiation (EMR) exposure from electrical power grids, cell towers and wireless devices is likely a driver of the global increase in diabetes, according to a new report by Paul Héroux, Ph.D. Studies compiled by Héroux show that very low levels of EMR can affect how cells function, including how they handle glucose.

Electromagnetic radiation (EMR) is likely a driver of the global increase in diabetes, according to a new report by Paul Héroux, Ph.D.

The report — which includes over 280 citations — is a deep dive into the evidence suggesting that EMR exposure from electrical power grids and wireless radiation can dysregulate and raise blood sugar levels.

“Current EMR safety standards are inadequate for protecting long-term metabolic health,” Héroux told The Defender.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which sets the U.S. safety limits for wireless radiation exposure, based its limits on the assumption that wireless radiation can only cause harm at levels high enough to heat human tissue.

But the studies Héroux compiled show that very low levels of EMR can impact how cells function, including how they handle glucose.

Diabetes occurs when a person’s blood sugar levels are too high, according to the Cleveland Clinic. As of 2023, 364,000 U.S. kids and teens were diabetic, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Although more recent figures aren’t available, the CDC in 2024 reported that the number of young people with Type 1 and/or Type 2 diabetes is on the rise.

In 2023, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) issued new clinical guidelines that endorsed weight-loss drugs and weight-loss surgeries as “safe and effective” treatments for childhood obesity.

The same year, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved two drugs to treat Type 2 diabetes for children ages 10 and up.

Meanwhile, AAP hasn’t updated its parental guidance on cellphone radiation in nearly a decade, despite numerous studies in recent years highlighting the dangers of exposure in children. A link on the group’s parenting advice webpage lists telecommunications company AT&T as one of its corporate sponsors.

“It’s almost unfathomable what the link between EMR and diabetes could mean for kids’ health if we don’t change course,” said Miriam Eckenfels, director of Children’s Health Defense’s (CHD) EMR & Wireless Program.

“It’s not like there is a simple fix, like changing your diet,” she said. “Our children are being radiated 24/7, at home, in schools, on their phones and from nearby cell towers. We should really be paying attention to this.”

Doctor: Héroux’s ‘argument is difficult to ignore’

Héroux’s report appears as a chapter in the book, “The Impact of Anthropogenic Activities on the Natural Environment and Societies during the Contemporary Period,” currently available for preorder.

Héroux is an associate professor of medicine at McGill University in Montreal, Canada, and a medical scientist in McGill University Health Center’s surgery department.

He is also vice chair of the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, a “consortium of scientists, doctors and researchers” who study wireless radiation and make recommendations for wireless radiation exposure “based on the best peer-reviewed research publications.”

Although the report is academic, it has “down-to-earth consequences” — especially for children, who are more susceptible to the negative health impacts of wireless radiation.

The report traces research showing that EMR can suppress mitochondrial energy production in cells, increase oxidative stress and lower pH in some body fluids.

“These changes impair insulin secretion, reduce insulin binding, elevate blood glucose and promote insulin resistance,” Héroux said.

He also tracks how diabetes rates have climbed alongside the proliferation of technologies that emit EMR.

Yet the general public and “average medical audience” don’t realize EMR’s impact on metabolism, including a person’s diabetes risk, said Dr. Sharon Goldberg, an integrative and functional medicine doctor who has years of experience treating patients sickened by EMR exposure.

“His argument is difficult to ignore for anyone who takes the time to actually read what he has written,” she said.

EMR also linked to weight gain, hypertension

Beatrice Alexandra Golomb, M.D, Ph.D., a professor of medicine at the University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, said she has “long recognized” that EMR can play a role in “not only in diabetes but in all of the metabolic syndrome factors, including weight gain and hypertension.”

However, medical training generally overlooks the impact of environmental toxins like EMR. Golomb explained:

“Much of medical education revolves around organ-based physiology and conditions for which drugs and procedures are often a prioritized approach. There is not much attention to the impact of environmental toxins or, more generally, to conditions tied to exposure-induced mitochondrial or cell energy impairment.”

Golomb leads a research group that studies conditions related to oxidative stress and cell energy impairments, including electrosensitivity — renamed EMR Syndrome in 2025.

In 2011, she posted a research paper in Nature Proceedings. The paper documented “extensive evidence” that some factors that cause oxidative stress and cell energy impairment — including EMR exposure — are driving the diabetic and metabolic syndrome epidemics.

She has since spoken with people who told her they experience serious weight gain linked to EMR exposure.

One person who had been overweight told Golomb that 80 pounds “melted away” when the person was able to relocate to a low-EMR environment, Golomb said.

News outlets are unlikely to report on such stories because the wireless industry is a big source of their advertising revenue, according to EMR researcher Camilla Rees.

Just because researchers like Héroux and Golomb publish reports doesn’t mean doctors will take the time to read them. Many doctors don’t read all the published science on EMR, Rees said.

“There is also the corporate influence on universities — and on medical associations — so the truth about environmental factors impacting people’s health can often be little known and long suppressed,” she said.

Higher EMR frequencies like 5G can still disrupt glucose levels

Some may doubt that 5G could increase a person’s diabetes risk. That’s because the pancreas — which produces insulin — is deep in the body, and 5G doesn’t penetrate beyond the skin, according to Dr. Robert Brown.

Brown is a diagnostic radiologist and the vice president of Scientific Research and Clinical Affairs for the Environmental Health Trust.

Héroux said 5G could still disturb a person’s glucose metabolism, because all body tissues — including those at the skin level — use insulin.

Also, lower frequencies of wireless radiation can directly affect the pancreas, he added.

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/emr-radiation-cell-towers-wireless-devices-diabetes-kids/?utm_id=20260222

US Intelligence: 15,000+ Let Free From ISIS Detention Camp After Collapse

Al Hol camp last year, AFP/Getty Images

Zero Hedge

Another ‘win’ for America’s disastrous Syria policy, long predicated on overthrowing the Assad government and installing a ‘moderate’ Sunni regime – though it turns out Jolani’s bearded Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) militants are anything but…

U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded that 15,000 to 20,000 people, including Islamic State affiliates are now at large in Syria, after an exodus from a camp that held jihadists’ families, U.S. officials familiar with the estimate said,” The Wall Street Journal reports Friday.

Who could have predicted that chaos, instability, and terrorism would come out of the CIA’s Operation Timber Sycamore? Well, we did, and every rational observer of the Syria situation.

A billion plus dollars and hundreds of thousands of lives after the decade-long proxy war, and this is all Washington has to show for it:

Security experts have long warned that the wives of Islamic State fighters were effectively raising the next generation of militants at the sprawling Al-Hol facility. Security at the camp fell apart in recent weeks after Syria’s government routed the U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces, which had guarded Al-Hol for years, raising concerns about the release of people who might have become radicalized during the years held behind the razor wire.

The size of a small city, the camp in Syria’s eastern desert at one point held more than 70,000 people after U.S.-backed forces destroyed what remained of Islamic State’s self-proclaimed caliphate in Syria in 2019. At the end of 2025, more than 23,000 people were there, according to a report this week from the Pentagon’s Inspector General.

The US military is rapidly backing out of this region after the years-long occupation, effectively throwing the Kurds (SDF) under the bus, as HTS radicals move in and take control.

Given many analysts have pointed to HTS being ‘ISIS-lite’ to begin with, the following WSJ note is no surprise: “The vast majority have left Al-Hol after the Syrian government took control last month. Western diplomats in Damascus assessed that more than 20,000 people fled the camp in a matter of days earlier amid rioting and a surge of escape attempts.”

There were even reports that the ISIS prisoners greeted the government HTS troops rolling in as ‘liberators’. The new government is certainly not “fighting” Islamic State cells… quite the contrary:

And now the Washington blob is simply moving on to the next regime change operation, this time a little further east in Iran, which it turns out was a key Assad ally.

So in place of the secular nationalist Baath party (under the Assad family), the West has the literal founder of Syrian al-Qaeda as president of Damascus, letting ISIS prisoners and affiliates walk free.

[…]

Via https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/us-intelligence-15000-were-let-free-isis-detention-camp-after-collapse

Denmark rejects Trump’s plan to send US hospital ship to Greenland

The United States USNS Mercy hospital ship.

Press TV

The leaders of Greenland and Denmark have rejected US President Donald Trump’s plan to dispatch a hospital ship to the Arctic territory, saying the island does not need foreign medical assistance.

Trump, in a Truth Social post on Saturday, announced he would send a “great hospital boat to take care of the many people who are sick, and not being taken care of there. It’s on the way.”

Denmark’s Defense Minister Troels Lund Poulsen told reporters on Sunday that his government had not been made aware of the plan. He said there was “no need for special health care efforts” in Greenland.

“Trump is constantly tweeting about Greenland. So this is undoubtedly an expression of the new normal that has taken hold in international politics,” Lund Poulsen added.

Greenlandic Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen also rejected the plan in a Facebook post, saying Greenland has “a public health system where care is free for citizens.”

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen responded on Instagram, without mentioning Trump or the United States directly, writing that she is “happy to live in a country where there is free and equal access to health care for everyone.” She added, “The same approach exists in Greenland.”

Greenland has six hospitals serving a population of fewer than 60,000 people. In early February, the territory’s government signed an agreement with Copenhagen to improve Greenlandic patients’ access to treatment in Danish hospitals.

Trump’s latest remarks are seen as part of his continuing pressure campaign on Greenland. The US president has repeatedly said the United States needs to acquire the semi-autonomous territory of NATO ally Denmark for national security reasons.

He later backed down on earlier threats to seize Greenland unilaterally after striking a “framework” deal in January with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, intended to ensure greater US influence.

However, at the Munich Security Conference this month, Frederiksen said she still feared US intentions toward the island. She called the pressure from the United States “unacceptable” and “outrageous.”

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/02/22/764545/Greenland-Denmark-reject-Trump-plan-US-hospital-ship

Ansarullah decries Israel’s bloody massacre in east Lebanon, urges unified Arab action

This picture taken on February 21, 2026 shows buildings destroyed by Israeli airstrikes in the village of Rayak, eastern Lebanon. (Photo by Xinhua)

Press TV

Yemen’s Ansarullah resistance movement has strongly condemned the Israeli regime’s “bloody massacre” in Lebanon’s eastern Beqaa region, which killed roughly a dozen people and wounded many more, calling it a flagrant violation of humanitarian values and international conventions.

The political bureau of Ansarullah said on Sunday that the Israeli airstrike, which targeted a neighborhood inside the Ain al-Hilweh Palestinian refugee camp in the city of Sidon in southern Lebanon, falls within the framework of Israel’s expansionist agendas.

It said the crime extends beyond attacking Lebanese civilians and infringing upon Lebanon’s sovereignty, describing it as part of attempts to enforce new dynamics associated with the initiative of the so-called “Greater Israel” and the “New Middle East.”

It also expressed its complete support for the Lebanese nation and the Hezbollah resistance movement in the face of Israeli acts of aggression backed by US and Western threats.

Lebanon’s Ministry of Public Health said on Saturday that Israeli strikes on eastern Lebanon killed 10 people and wounded 24, including three children.

Two officials with Hezbollah said eight members of the resistance movement were killed in strikes near the village of Rayak in northeast Lebanon late on Friday.

One of the Hezbollah officials said three of the dead were local commanders and identified them as Ali al-Moussawi, Mohammed al-Moussawi and Hussein Yaghi.

Yaghi was the son of prominent Hezbollah official and one of its founders, Mohammed Yaghi, who died in 2023. Mohammed Yaghi was also a close aide to late Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah who was assassinated in an Israeli airstrike in southern Beirut in September 2024.

In its statement, Ansarullah also sharply criticized the latest remarks by United States Ambassador to the Israeli-occupied territories Mike Huckabee, where he suggested that the regime has a right to expand its territory across a large swath of the West Asia region.

It stated that Huckabee’s comments went beyond diplomatic standards and revealed clear US support for Israel’s expansionist goals at the cost of Palestine and other Arab nations, adding that mere statements of condemnation are inadequate now.

The resistance group called upon Arab governments to take serious and coordinated measures to address the escalating danger.

It finally urged Arab and Muslim nations to take on their responsibilities regarding what it cautioned are grave challenges threatening the survival of the entire nation.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/02/22/764524/Ansarullah-decries-Israel%E2%80%99s-bloody-massacre-in-east-Lebanon,-urges-unified-Arab-action

Trump sending hospital ship to Greenland ‘to care for the sick’

Trump sending hospital ship to Greenland ‘to care for the sick’

RT

The US president has taken a swipe at the Danish authorities, claiming many of those unwell are not being treated

US President Donald Trump said he is sending a hospital ship to Greenland, the Danish autonomous territory in the Arctic he has sought to annex.

He announced the plan on Truth Social on Saturday, saying he was working with Jeff Landry, his special envoy to Greenland, whose appointment in December Copenhagen condemned as a diplomatic breach. Landry has called Denmark’s rule of Greenland an “occupation” and urged the island to seek independence to align with the US.

“Working with the fantastic Governor of Louisiana, Jeff Landry, we are going to send a great hospital boat to Greenland to take care of the many people who are sick, and not being taken care of there. It’s on the way!!!” Trump wrote in an apparent swipe at both the Greenlandic and Danish authorities.

Landry welcomed Trump’s announcement on X, writing: “Thank you, President @realDonaldTrump! Proud to work with you on this important issue!”

Neither Trump nor Landry offered clarity on whether the deployment was requested by Denmark or Greenland or who needed treatment. The Department of War deflected media queries to US Northern Command, which passed them to the US Navy. No response was forthcoming from either.

Greenland has a publicly funded universal healthcare system, though reports cite chronic understaffing and logistical constraints. However, Denmark pledged 1.6 billion DKK ($253 million) in September for healthcare and infrastructure upgrades through 2029 and has launched further reforms.

Trump’s post came hours after Denmark’s Joint Arctic Command evacuated a US Navy sailor requiring urgent non-combat medical treatment from a submarine in Greenland’s waters near the capital, Nuuk. It was unclear if Trump’s post had any connection to the incident.

Trump intensified his push to acquire Greenland last year, calling it vital to US national security He openly hinted at possible use of force and mocking Denmark’s defenses of the island as consisting of “two dog sleds.” The rhetoric alarmed NATO partners, with some warning an annexation bid could fracture the alliance. Greenland and Denmark rejected Trump’s demands.

Trump later softened his tone, saying last month he and NATO chief Mark Rutte had agreed on a on a “framework” on Greenland and Arctic security. However, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned last week Trump remains “very serious” about annexation. She stressed Denmark is willing to expand US military access but will not compromise on territorial integrity.
[…]

Medieval Muslim Medicine and Hospitals

Existence of God - Avicenna - The Path of Mystics

Ibn Sina

Episode 13 – Medieval Muslim Medicine and Hospitals

Islamic Golden Age (2017)

By Eamon Gearon

Film Review

In this lecture, Gearon discusses the two most prominent physicians during the Golden Age of Islam, Abu Bakr al-Razi and Ibn Sina, and the former’s role in significantly expanding the number of hospitals in the Muslim world.

Abu Bakr al-Razi

Born in 854 AD in Ray Persia, al-Razi is viewed as the father of Islamic medicine and influenced medical studies in Europe and the Middle East for hundreds of years. An accomplished oude player as a teenager, in adulthood, he took up alchemy, mathematics and literature. At age 30, he moved to Baghdad to study medicine. He challenged Galen’s theory that an imbalance in the four humors (blood, black bile, yellow bile and phlegm) caused all illnesses. Al-Razi asserted some illnesses were caused by oiliness, inflammation, saltiness or sulphurousness

He was the first physician to identify a mind-body connection, the importance of exercise and a healthy diet, to distinguish between smallpox and measles and to prescribe opium for melancholia (depression) – a treatment in wide use until the 20th century. He was also the first to maintain that every illness had a cause that could be discovered by research, ie that sickness wasn’t punishment from God.

He published 200 manuscripts, including Diseases of Children, Comprehensive Book of Medicine, a complete catalogue of existing medical scholarship from ancient Greece, India and Persia, and a home manual for treating everyday illness. European medical students were still using his Comprehensive Book of Medicine as a textbook 700 years later.

He also helped expand the number of hospitals in the Muslim world.* All Muslim hospitals were secular (often funded by private donors), employing Muslim, Christian and Jewish doctor and treating all patients who sought help, regardless of citizenship, race, religion or gender. All hospitals also served as medical schools and were required to keep patient records to be licensed. By 1000 AD, there were 30 hospitals across the Islamic world, each housing separate wards for contagious disease, mental illness and surgery.

Ibn Sina

Ibn Sina (980-1037 AD) is viewed a the father of early modern medicine. Born in Uzbekistan, he studied medicine at age 13 and was practicing by 16. He was the first to identify the airborne transmission of illness, to differentiate between central and peripheral facial paralysis, to catalogue various psychiatric illnesses ( asserting they weren’t a punishment from God) and to produce and prescribe heart drugs.

He wrote the five volume Canon of Medicine in 1025, the most comprehensive medical text to that time and still used in Europe in the 18th century.

  • Volume 1 – Anatomy and Regima (lifestyle changes such as diet and exercise that improve health)
  • Volume 2 – 800 simple medical remedies and their uses
  • Volume 3 – list of all body parts and their function
  • Volume 4 – lists of ailments of affecting more than one organ
  • Volume 5 – formulary of 650 compounded remedies.

*The first hospital in the Middle East was Gondishoper in Persia founded in the third century AD. The 325 AD Council of Nicea subsequently ordained that every cathedral town (in the Byzantine Empire) would build a hospital. The first Muslim hospital (it was actually a leprosarium) was built by the Umayyad calipphate in 707 in Damascus. Harun al-Rashid built the first hospital in Baghdad in 809 AD.

https://www.kanopy.com/en/pukeariki/watch/video/5756987/5757013

MMR and MMRV Vaccines Linked to 2,657% More U.S. Deaths Than Measles Infection Since 1995

We found an alarming number of deaths among infants and toddlers shortly after MMR/MMRV vaccination in VAERS — often involving SIDS, seizures, and cardiac arrest.

For decades, Americans have been told that measles represents a grave and ongoing threat — and that MMR vaccination is one of the safest and most effective interventions in modern medicine. Pharma-captured mass media and public health agencies have centered almost exclusively on the minimal dangers of measles infection and ignored grieving parents whose children were injured or even killed by the shots. No proper attention has been paid to signals emerging within the federal government’s own vaccine safety database.

Now, our new McCullough Foundation study titled “Deaths Following MMR and MMRV Vaccination in the United States,” authored by Kirstin Cosgrove, Breanne Craven, Claire Rogers, John A. Catanzaro, Albert Benevides, M. Nathaniel Mead, Mila Radetich, Peter A. McCullough, and Nicolas Hulscher (myself), takes a comprehensive look at reported fatal outcomes following MMR and MMRV vaccination in the United States, doing the work that our public health agencies should have done many years ago.

After analyzing VAERS data through August 29, 2025, we identified a serious mortality safety signal following MMR/MMRV vaccination in the United States.What we observed was not a diffuse or randomly scattered pattern across age groups and time intervals. Instead, we found an alarming number of deaths among infants and toddlers within days of receiving MMR/MMRV vaccines, sharply clustered in the routine first-dose window.

Most fatalities appeared to involve acute deterioration following vaccination, with manifestations including fever, seizures, and cardiac arrest at home, frequently culminating in classification as Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). A small proportion survived hospitalization but were unable to be resuscitated.

Perhaps most striking is the broader context. Since 1995, there have been 193 U.S. MMR/MMRV vaccine-associated death reports with identifiable dates, compared to 7 measles infection–associated deaths recorded in the United States during the same period. That represents a 2,657% higher count of reported vaccine-associated deaths than measles deaths in the modern era.

Here’s a full breakdown of our findings:

Total MMR/MMRV Death Reports Identified in VAERS

Using the MedAlerts interface to query VAERS from inception through August 29, 2025, we identified:

  • 536 total global reports of death following MMR or MMRV vaccination
  • 299 reports explicitly attributed to the United States (focus of this study)

VAERS is widely recognized to be substantially underreported. A federally funded investigation led by Lazarus et al. found that fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events may be reported to national surveillance systems. In other words, VAERS captures only a small fraction of total adverse outcomes.

Measles Vaccinations Vs. Measles Infection

Since 1995:

  • 193 U.S. MMR/MMRV death reports with identifiable dates
  • 7 measles infection–associated deaths in the United States (CDC surveillance)

This represents a 2,657% higher count of reported vaccine-associated deaths compared to measles deaths over the same period.

This is absolutely absurd. A vaccine should NEVER be deadlier than the disease.

Mortality Concentrated in the First-Dose Age Window

Among the 299 U.S. reports:

  • 182 deaths (60.9%) occurred in children under age 2
  • 156 deaths (52.2%) occurred between 1.0–1.5 years of age

That 1.0–1.5 year age band corresponds precisely to the routine 12–15 month first MMR dose.

Rather than a gradual distribution across childhood, we observed a sharp concentration during the narrow developmental window when the first dose is typically administered. The age clustering was pronounced and non-uniform.

Most Deaths Occurred Within Two Weeks

Time-to-death analysis demonstrated a strongly front-loaded distribution:

  • 120 deaths (40.1%) occurred within 7 days
  • 158 deaths (52.8%) occurred within 14 days

Among first-week deaths with available age data, 68.6% occurred in children 1.0–1.5 years old, reinforcing the synchronization between age peak and immediate post-vaccination timing.

The highest concentration of deaths occurred in the immediate days following vaccination — not months or years later.

Majority Occurred During Multi-Vaccine Visits

We also examined concomitant vaccine exposure:

  • 74.6% of deaths followed visits involving MMR/MMRV plus one or more additional vaccines
  • 25.4% followed MMR/MMRV alone

Recurring Clinical Presentations

Clinical features preceding death showed recurring patterns:

  • 24% SIDS or sudden unexplained death
  • 15% fever
  • 12% seizures
  • 8% cardiac arrest
  • 7% respiratory distress
  • 3% encephalitis

Notably, 68% of SIDS cases occurred in the 1.0–1.5 year age group, mirroring the first-dose window.

Additionally:

  • 23.7% involved emergency department visits
  • 25.4% involved hospital admissions

Many cases involved documented acute clinical deterioration prior to death.

Taken together, these findings cannot be brushed aside as coincidence or statistical noise. The clustering across age, timing, vaccination context, and recurring clinical presentations forms a coherent and internally consistent signal of death within the federal reporting system itself.

As our study concluded:

We identified a serious mortality safety signal following MMR/MMRV vaccination in the United States. A substantial number of reported deaths were documented, with patterns demonstrating pronounced alignment across age, temporality, routine-dose timing, concomitant vaccine exposure, and recurring clinical presentations—including fever, seizures, SIDS, and cardiac arrest.

Reported deaths were predominantly concentrated in children under 2 years of age, and the majority occurred within the first 14 days following vaccination. The synchronization of age-specific clustering with immediate post-vaccination timing reflects a non-random pattern of mortality. This concern is further amplified by the stark contrast between reported vaccine-associated deaths and the exceedingly rare number of measles infection–associated deaths in the modern era.

The magnitude, concentration, and temporal proximity of these reports demand rigorous, transparent, and fully independent evaluation. Future research should prioritize active surveillance cohort studies, detailed autopsies with virologic testing, and record-linked datasets capable of assessing background mortality and determining causal relationships.

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/mmr-mmrv-vaccines-more-us-deaths-measles-infection/5916326

Taliban Joins Axis of Resistance

The Taliban is once again making headlines when they recently declared that they will back Iran if, or when the US and Israel launch an attack on the country.

According to a recent report,

Zabihullah Mujahid, the chief spokesman for the Taliban‑led government in Afghanistan, has said that Afghans are prepared to “cooperate and show sympathy” with the people of Iran if the United States launches a military attack” continued, “Speaking in an interview with the Pashto service of Radio Iran, Mujahid stated that if Tehran requests assistance in the event of a U.S. attack, Afghanistan’s people are ready —within their capacity — to offer cooperation and solidarity.”

Mujahid mentioned Iran’s victory in the 12-day war against the US-Israel attacks back in June saying that Tehran “was victorious in the 12‑day war” and would prevail again because it “has the capability, is in the right, and has the right to defend itself.”

The Jerusalem Post reported that

“In January 2025, the Taliban’s Foreign Minister, Mawlawi Amir KhanMuttaqi, hosted a delegation in Kabul led by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi to discuss multiple issues, including water resources, Afghan migrants, and security of the shared borders.”

Araghchi met with high-level officials of the Taliban-led government including Mohammad Hassan Akhund to most likely, increase cooperation between Afghanistan and Iran.

It was reported by The Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) in the Long War Journal section, which is a Zionist-based think-tank in Washington, D.C. that on June 13thTaliban spokesman Mujahid had released a statement declaring that

“The Taliban has condemned Israeli strikes on Iranian soil, including the elimination of nuclear personnel, denouncing the attacks as “actions that flagrantly violate the core tenets of international law.”

Mujahid also had criticized Israel and its war on the Gaza Strip,

“These actions unfold at a time when the oppressed people of Palestine, particularly in Gaza, endure relentless and devastating assaults, with the occupying regime persisting in these activities in defiance ofhumanitarian and international norms.”

The Taliban Has Experience in Defeating US Forces

The 911 false-Flag terror attack was eventually blamed on Osama Bin Laden and the US created Al-Qaeda network. So on October 7th, 2001, the Bush regime authorized the US military and their allies to invade Afghanistan to dismantle the Taliban under Operation Enduring Freedom which was supported by the majority of the US population who was in shock after the attacks on the World Trade Center in NYC and the Pentagon. The US and its allies including the UK, Canada and Australia began with a major air campaign attacking cities in Afghanistan including Kabul, Kandahar and Jalalabad with various military aircraft including F- 14’s, F-18s, B-1s, B-2s and B-52 bombers. All sorts of bombs and cruise missiles were also used by the US and British Navies. Special operation forces from the US and UK were also on the ground during the operation.

However, the ‘Graveyard of Empires’ added the US empire to its list as the Taliban regained its power after the US withdrew its military on August 15, 2021. The US government spent more than $2.3 trillion on the war with over 2,400 U.S. military deaths and more than 20,000 injured. Under the Trump regime, the US military left behind billions of dollars of military equipment (which the Taliban now owns) in a botched attempt to exit Afghanistan.

The Trump regime has indirectly inspired the Taliban to take-up arms along with Yemen, Lebanon (Hezbollah) and Iraqi resistance groups if they decide to attack Iran. World War III is now a reality that will change the geopolitics of the world as Trump is getting close to making a rash decision to attack Iran. The question is, what is the Trump regime willing to do to remain a hegemonic power in the Middle East and beyond when the growing resistance is prepared to fight until the end? Will Washington decide to use a nuclear weapon on the Middle East if they realize that they are about to lose the war?

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/taliban-joins-axis-resistance/5916556

Was Climate Change The Greatest Financial Scandal In History?

Zero Hedge

Environmental scholar Bjorn Lomborg recently calculated that across the globe, governments have spent at least $16 trillion feeding the climate change industrial complex.

And for what?

Arguably, not a single life has been or will be saved by this shameful and colossal misallocation of human resources.

The war on safe and abundant fossil fuels has cost countless lives in poor countries and made those countries poorer by blocking affordable energy.

Since the global warming crusade started some 30 years ago, the temperature of the planet has not been altered by one-tenth of a degree—as even the alarmists will admit.

In other words, $16 trillion has been spent—a lot of people got very, very rich off the government largesse—but there is not a penny of measurable payoff.

But it’s much worse than that.

In economics there is a concept called opportunity cost: What could we have done with $16 trillion to make the world better off?

What if the $16 trillion had been spent on clean water for poor countries?

Preventing avoidable deaths from diseases like malaria?

Building schools in African villages to end illiteracy?

Bringing reliable and affordable electric power to the more than 1 billion people who still lack access? Curing cancer?

Many millions of lives could have been saved.

We could have lifted millions more out of poverty.

The benefits of speeding up the race for the cure for cancer could have added tens of millions of additional years of life at an economic value in the tens of trillions of dollars.

Instead, we effectively poured $16 trillion down the drain.

For this reason, it is important that we identify the green “climate change” derangement syndrome as perhaps the most inhumane political movement in history.

The one sliver of good news is that it appears the climate change neuroses have finally started to subside. We’ve reached peak global warming craziness in the U.S., for sure, and even Europe seems to have turned its back on its economically masochistic net zero fossil fuels obsession.

Donald Trump is wisely and rapidly dismantling the climate change industrial complex.

Of all his pro-growth economic policies, there may be none with a higher longtime payoff than his recent order to repeal the mother of all costly regulations: the anti-fossil fuels “endangerment rule” taxing carbon dioxide emissions. The cost of that regulation had been estimated to exceed $1 trillion over time.

We can’t recapture the $16 trillion wasted on a false crisis. Sunk costs are, alas, sunk.

But we can stop the madness of actually believing that politicians who can’t even pay off the balance on their credit cards can somehow change the world’s temperature.

[…]

Via https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/was-climate-change-greatest-financial-scandal-history

Third US citizen killed by feds revealed

Third US citizen killed by feds revealed

 

RT

Ruben Ray Martinez was shot during a traffic stop in Texas last year, according to newly released documents

Newly released documents show that a US immigration agent shot and killed an American citizen in Texas in 2025, marking the third known death linked to immigration enforcement operations, multiple media outlets have reported.

The incident happened months before the shootings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti by federal agents in Minneapolis in January during President Donald Trump’s sweeping immigration crackdown. The killings ignited a renewed wave of outrage against the effort.

Ruben Ray Martinez, 23, was killed by a federal agent in South Padre Island in March 2025, multiple news outlets wrote on Friday, citing internal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) documents recently released by the nonprofit watchdog American Oversight. ICE agents were reportedly carrying out immigration enforcement operations in conjunction with local police.

Martinez was shot after he “intentionally ran over a Homeland Security Investigation special agent” during a traffic stop, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said in a statement cited by multiple outlets.

At the time, local media reported the incident as an officer-involved shooting, but the involvement of federal agents was not revealed until after the internal report was released earlier this week.

Democratic Texas Congressman Joaquin Castro has accused ICE of burying the incident.

“I am calling for a full investigation into this shooting, including why there was an 8-month cover up,” he wrote on X on Saturday.

Martinez’s death would mark the earliest of the three known killings of US citizens linked to Trump’s nationwide immigration crackdown since the start early in his second term.

Last month’s killings of Good and Pretti caused public outrage, prompting border czar Tom Homan to downsize the force of federal agents deployed in Minneapolis.

Speaking to NBC news earlier in February, Trump acknowledged that his administration could have used a “little bit of a softer touch,” but insisted that the immigration crackdown is targeting “really hard criminals.”

Around half of the 1.6 million illegal immigrants with final deportation orders are convicted criminals, acting ICE Director Todd Lyons said last week.

Nevertheless, public support for the crackdown has declined, according to a recent Ipsos poll conducted for the Washington Post and ABC News and published on Friday. Around 58% of Americans feel that the deportations are “going too far,” while 62% oppose the aggressive tactics employed by ICE, it found.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/632871-third-us-citizen-killed-by-feds/