The Most Revolutionary Act

Uncensored updates on world events, economics, the environment and medicine

The Most Revolutionary Act

Beijing Declaration: Palestinian Factions Agree to ‘National Unity’ Government

The agreement follows a Knesset decision totally rejecting Palestinian statehood, and comes as ceasefire efforts remain stalled due to Israel’s position on continuing the war.

The Cradle

Hamas, the Palestinian Authority’s (PA) Fatah party, and twelve other Palestinian factions have signed a Chinese-brokered reconciliation agreement during meetings in Beijing, which began on 21 July and ended on 23 July.

The 14 factions agreed on “ending division and strengthening Palestinian unity,” Chinese broadcaster CCTV reported on 23 July.

The agreement was “dedicated to the great reconciliation and unity of all 14 factions,” Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said on Tuesday.

“The core outcome is that the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) is the sole legitimate representative of all Palestinian people. An agreement has been reached on post Gaza war governance and the establishment of a provisional national reconciliation government,” he added.

Hussam Badran, head of Hamas’ National Relations Office, said in a press statement that the agreement was a positive step on the right path and thanked China for its mediation efforts and support.

“The Beijing Declaration is an additional positive step on the path to achieving Palestinian national unity,” he said, expressing his “high appreciation for the great efforts made by China to reach this declaration.”

“The official statement signed by the factions is clear in its contents, and is not what has been published and circulated since yesterday,” Badran added. “There was agreement on the Palestinian demands related to ending the war and barbaric aggression, which are: a ceasefire, complete withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, relief, and reconstruction.”

He went on to say that the most important point of the agreement was the idea of establishing a national consensus government “that would manage the affairs of our people in Gaza and the West Bank, supervise reconstruction, and prepare the conditions for elections,” adding that this was Hamas’ position since the start of the war.

According to a copy of the declaration obtained by Al Mayadeen on Monday, the factions vowed to “end the Palestinian national division” and “unify national efforts to confront the [Israeli] aggression and stop the genocide.”

According to the document, the Palestinian factions will implement the agreement with support from Egypt, Algeria, China, and Russia.

It emphasizes the “commitment to the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with Al-Quds (Jerusalem) as its capital,” to be implemented through UN Resolution 181 (1947 resolution on partition) and UN Resolution 2334 (which labels Israeli settlements illegal under international law).

The declaration also highlighted the Palestinian people’s right to resistance, right to end the occupation, and right to self-determination, according to Al Mayadeen.

A final and official statement on the Beijing meeting has yet to be released.

Last week, Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) movement called in a statement for the PLO to drop its recognition of Israel, coming as a response to the recent Knesset vote completely rejecting the establishment of Palestinian statehood.

The Beijing talks come as the US and Israel have been floating ideas on a post-war international mission involving Arab states that would administer Gaza once the fighting comes to an end. The initiatives exclude Hamas and involve a “reformation” of the PA.

Several resistance factions, including Hamas and the PIJ, have rejected these initiatives and repeatedly stressed that the Palestinian people will be the ones to decide the future of the strip and its governance.

[…]

Via https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/07/23/beijing-declaration-palestinian-factions-agree-to-national-unity-government/

Zero Amish Children Diagnosed with Cancer, Diabetes or Autism

Zero Amish Children Diagnosed with Cancer, Diabetes or Autism

Photo by Skip Harless on flickr

 

By Jacqueline

“The Amish are a perfect example of a large group of people who are largely unvaccinated,” testified Steve Kirsch before the Pennsylvania State Senate.

It was calculated that for Amish children, who are strictly 100% unvaccinated, typical chronic conditions barely exist, if any at all. The chronic conditions, which 54% of vaccinated American children suffer from, include autoimmune disease, heart disease, diabetes, asthma, ADHD, arthritis, cancer, and autism.

This is not to say they don’t have any medical issues, however. There is a huge difference between some dental problems or eating a lot of white bread and refined sugar (which many do) —and the rampant vaccine-induced chronic illness we see in the general population.

The largest concentrations of Amish are ~90,000 in Pennsylvania and ~82,000 in Ohio, and other communities have settled in as many as 32 other states. The current U.S. Amish population is rapidly approaching 400,000.

(My husband grew up with many here in our state, and we live near a small community now. I don’t want to idealize them too much, and some of their culture is strange to me, but you can’t hide that their children are vigorous, and grow up lacking the many health issues in the general U.S. population. I would also maybe include the Mennonite and German Baptist communities in this group.)

Amish families average 7 children. For the most part, they are solid traditionalists who are known for their simple living, plain dress, and Christian pacifism. They value rural life, manual labor, humility, and Gesundheit (submission to God’s will) with a view neither to interrupt family time nor replace face-to-face conversations whenever possible.

They reject most conveniences of modern technology (TV, electronic devices) and pharmaceuticals and maintain self-sufficiency (including medically).

They also (for the most part) cook and eat outside of the contaminated mainstream food supply, raising their own meat and having big gardens, and often having their own type of grocery store like this one we’ve been in.

The Amish are among the healthiest people in the nation.

That study conducted by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation found that COVID death rates among the Amish communities are 90 times LOWER than for the rest of America despite roughly 90% of the Amish having been infected with COVID.

The main difference, Kirsch revealed, is that Amish communities completely ignored the guidelines from the CDC. Amish families did not get vaccinated or wear masks, nor did they engage in lock-downs, social distancing, or any other type of restrictions.

What The CDC Has Known About the Amish All Along

Kirsch shared why there have never been any CDC or government reports published regarding the good health of Amish children in general.

“After decades of studying the Amish, there’s no report because that would be devastating to the narrative. It would show that CDC dictates have been harming the public for decades by saying nothing and burying all the data,” Kirsch testified.

Leading cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough (with over 1000 peer-reviewed, published studies to his credit) spoke specifically about the rise of chronic conditions among the non-Amish public.

Steve Kirsch, Dr. McCullough, attorney Thomas Renz, and medico-legal death investigator Graham Hetrick all testified on the panel of experts.

It should shake us to the core that so many vaccinated American children and middle-aged Americans who received them in their childhood, suffer from devastating chronic conditions which include auto-immune disease, heart disease, diabetes, asthma, ADHD, arthritis, cancer, and autism.

These conditions are NON-EXISTANT among unvaxxed Amish communities.

According to expert testimony, no Amish child could be found who had suffered from cancer, autism, heart disease, or other conditions.

[…]

Via https://deeprootsathome.com/zero-amish-children-diagnosed-with-cancer-diabetes-or-autism/

DOD Funds Research on Fake Meat Rations to Improve Soldiers’ ‘Military Readiness’

dod fake meat military readiness

Dr Mercola

Story at-a-glance

  • The Department of Defense is funding research on lab-grown “fake meat” rations for soldiers, partnering with BioMADE to develop synthetic food products for military use
  • Critics argue this initiative is unethical, comparing it to treating soldiers like lab rats and questioning the nutritional value of these artificial food products
  • The production process for lab-grown meat involves genetically engineered microbes and faces challenges such as potential contamination and the use of questionable cell lines
  • Despite claims of environmental benefits, studies suggest lab-grown meats may have a higher environmental impact than traditional beef production when considering the entire production chain
  • Health concerns arise as these lab-grown meats are classified as ultraprocessed foods, which have been linked to increased risks of cardiovascular disease and other health issues

The U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) has partnered with the BioIndustrial Manufacturing and Design Ecosystem (BioMADE) to produce lab-grown foods intended to feed the nation’s military. The public-private partnership, which is largely DOD funded, released a project call in May 2024 looking for proposals in a number of focus areas, including “sustainable food production.”1

Under this category, the Sustainable Logistics for Advanced Manufacturing (SLAM) project includes a call for innovations in food production that “could include, but are not limited to, production of nutrient-dense military rations via fermentation processes, utilizing one carbon molecule (C1) feedstocks for food production, and novel cell culture methods suitable for the production of cultivated meat/protein.”2

Ultimately, the partnership sets up military members as lab rats who will be fed synthetically grown, ultraprocessed junk foods in lieu of a healthy, whole-food-based diet.

DOD Plans to Feed Soldiers Fake Meat

The biotech industry is rolling out a “tsunami of fake foods”3 that are being positioned as environmentally friendly and health-promoting alternatives to real foods like meat and dairy. Lab-grown meat may one day represent 80% or more of the “meat” consumed worldwide,4 a dramatic departure from the way humans have eaten for centuries.

The DOD describes BioMADE as “a nonprofit created by the Engineering Biology Research Consortium (EBRC).” In 2020, it awarded the outfit $87 million in funding for a new Manufacturing Innovation Institute (MII):5

“Through a close relationship with DOD and the Military Services, BioMADE will work to establish long-term and dependable bioindustrial manufacturing capabilities for a wide array of products.

Anticipated bioindustrial manufacturing applications include the following products: chemicals, solvents, detergents, reagents, plastics, electronic films, fabrics, polymers, agricultural products (e.g., feedstock), crop protection solutions, food additives, fragrances, and flavors.”

However, the DOD also funds innovation grants, each of which has a $2-million limit up to a total budget of $500 million — funding that earmarked at least in part for BioMADE’s development of lab-grown fake meat products.6 In fact, in March 2023, BioMADE announced that its federal funds budget ceiling had increased from an initial $87.5 million to over $500 million.7

The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) condemned the idea. Ethan Lane, NCBA vice president of government affairs, said in a press release:8

“It is outrageous that the Department of Defense is spending millions of taxpayer dollars to feed our heroes like lab rats … American troops deserve to be served that same wholesome, natural meat and not ultraprocessed, lab-grown protein that is cooked up in a chemical-filled bioreactor.

This misguided research project is a giant slap in the face to everyone that has served our country. Our veterans and active-duty troops deserve so much better than this.”

Former U.S. Special Forces member Martin Bailey further told the Daily Mail:9

“I think the government should focus on letting the military protect our nation from enemies, foreign and domestic, sometimes, but you know, that’s what the military is there for. They’re not there to be experimental lab rats … why doesn’t the government feed experimental meat product that, you don’t even know what it is, why don’t they feed that to, let’s say, homeless people?

Well, there’s a reason they don’t, because that would be completely unethical. So why is it ethical to stick it down the throat of our military service members?”

‘Fermentation’ Processes for Lab-Grown Meat Are Far From Natural

In a process completely removed from nature, biotech companies are using precision fermentation based on genetically engineered (GE) microbes to create synthetic food products in a lab. Like other lab-grown meats on the market, BioMADE’s “nutrient-dense military rations” produced “via fermentation processes” will be made using processes far removed from the natural fermentation that occurs in the production of wholesome foods like yogurt.

In precision fermentation, GE microbes such as yeast and bacteria are fermented in brewery-style tanks under high-tech, sterile conditions. But serious problems have already emerged.

To make fake meat, cell lines are taken from a living organism. They’re then manipulated to grow quickly and consistently. “What are cells that proliferate quickly? Either cancers or fetuses. They have cells that proliferate very quickly,” Dutch investigative journalist Elze van Hamelen says.10 For lab-grown meats, biotech is cryptic about what types of cell lines are actually used.

Contamination in cultured meat is another serious issue. It must be controlled down to 2 parts per billion, van Hamelen says, “because as soon as there is a contamination … it becomes riddled with bacteria, and you don’t have a cell culture, you have a bacteria culture.”11

An expose in Wired points to a number of the technological challenges that van Hamelen also speaks of,12 direct from employees at Upside Foods, one of two companies allowed to sell cultured meat in the U.S. Wired reported:13

“One former employee says that between the factory opening in November 2021 and the summer of 2022, they saw dozens of attempts to use the bioreactors to produce sheets of tissue, but they rarely resulted in usable meat. At times, production runs were ruined by contamination that meant the meat was unsuitable for turning into a product, the former employee says.

Former Upside employees describe how batches of meat growing in the custom-made bioreactors would frequently be ruined by contamination and have to be incinerated. ‘Once they had any indication it was contaminating, they would try to just stop the run, get the cells, and get any results out of it that they could,’ says a former employee with knowledge of the process.”

Meanwhile, despite the pharmaceutical-style manufacturing, lab-grown meat isn’t considered a pharmaceutical product, which means no human testing is required. “If this is brought to market, it’s a human experiment,” van Hamelen says14 — one that apparently the DOD is willing to test out on its own military.

BioMADE Funds Bacteria Biomass Protein for Warfighters

One BioMADE-funded project that’s already underway is Superbrewed Food’s bacteria biomass protein.15 According to BioMADE:16

“Through this project, member Superbrewed Food (SBF) will produce sustainable protein, formulate it into a format that would be desired by warfighters, and conduct ex vivo studies to identify the nutrition and functional food benefits associated with their postbiotic protein ingredient.

There are several areas where SBF’s postbiotic protein could potentially enhance performance, including increased energy/endurance, shortened recovery times, improved focus and concentration, and overall performance and military readiness.”

In March 2024, Superbrewed received a no-questions letter from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration regarding the Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) status for its Postbiotic Cultured Protein product — making it the world’s first company to received such a notice for a bacteria biomass protein.

“Postbiotic Cultured Protein is the first ever FDA-notified, bacteria-derived biomass ingredient, similar in concept to nutritional fungal proteins,” the company reported.17 Meanwhile, Children’s Health Defense reported:18

“The company doesn’t only make edible proteins. In another BioMADE-funded, joint project with Lockheed Martin, the company is ‘doping’ nanoparticles with metals to modify their magnetic properties for various defense and commercial applications.

Other food-related funding by BioMADE includes funding to global food giant Cargill to scale up fermentation processes in its bioreactors. Bioreactors have applications in biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, food production and wastewater treatment.”

Lab-Grown Meats Take a Toll on the Environment

It’s a myth that fake meat is better for the environment than real animal foods, particularly those raised regeneratively. A preprint study from University of California, Davis researchers, for instance, found that the environmental impact of lab-grown meat is “likely to be orders of magnitude higher than median beef production.”19

In fact, fake foods are far from sustainable. Dr. John Fagan, a molecular biologist who worked with the U.S. National Institutes of Health for 8.5 years, explains:20

“The reality is that many of the carbon footprint calculations have been done starting with the fermentation process and going forward, but where did the high fructose corn syrup come from that is the primary energy component that goes into these fermentations?

… And you look at that industrial agriculture and you add that carbon footprint on to what they have been using in their calculations and suddenly it goes way in the wrong direction. And so we can’t even use the sustainability arguments to justify what’s being done. It just doesn’t work.”

Fake Meats Are Ultraprocessed Foods With Significant Health Risks

Lab-grown meat products are examples of highly processed foods, and with that comes a range of significant health risks. These ultraprocessed foods (UPFs) are a disaster for your health, even if they’re “animal-free” and “plant-based.”

A recent study on plant-based ultraprocessed foods like veggie burgers and meatless nuggets provides just one example. The study, which involved researchers from the University of São Paulo and Imperial College London, included data from 126,842 people who answered questions about their diets. Food groups were broken down into plant-sourced or non-plant/animal-sourced, then further divided into non-UPF or UPF as a percentage of total energy intake.

Hospital and mortality records were later linked to the data to gather information about cardiovascular diseases. Eating plant-sourced non-UPFs, such as fruits and vegetables, was beneficial. Every 10% increase in unprocessed plant-based foods was associated with a 7% lower risk of cardiovascular disease and a 13% lower risk of cardiovascular disease mortality.21

However, consuming plant-sourced ultraprocessed foods was linked with a 5% increased risk of cardiovascular disease and a 12% higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality.

Study author Eszter Vamos, from Imperial College London, added, “While ultraprocessed foods are often marketed as healthy foods, this large study shows that plant-based ultraprocessed foods do not seem to have protective health effects and are linked to poor health outcomes.”22

It’s not surprising that plant-based ultraprocessed foods are linked to heart risks and other health problems, as they’re typically loaded with seed oils, also known as vegetable oils, such as corn oil, soybean oil, sunflower oil and canola oil. Vegetable and seed oils are high in the omega-6 fatty acid linoleic acid (LA).23 At a molecular level, excess LA consumption damages your metabolism and impedes your body’s ability to generate energy in your mitochondria, driving chronic disease.

If the lab-grow “nutrient-dense rations” the DOD is studying for the military also include seed oils along with fake meat protein, it will be an even greater recipe for ill health among the military.

While all humans need whole, unprocessed foods to thrive, ensuring military members have access to wholesome, nutritious, real food — not fake lab-grown counterparts — is a fundamental component of maintaining their health and performance. Sigrid Johannes, NCBA senior director of government affairs, added:24

“These products are not yet approved for grocery store shelves, yet we have DOD putting money into developing these products for military rations. I don’t think it’s too much of a stretch to say they’re using our servicemen and women as test subjects for a product that still has a lot of nutritional questions hanging over it, plenty of environmental and safety questions hanging over it, and bottom line, just isn’t needed …

I’m a little bit confused why DOD is feeling the urgency to provide this kind of cell cultured, lab-grown, ultraprocessed product to our military.”

[…]

Via https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2024/07/23/dod-fake-meat-military-readiness.aspx

Nomadic Predecessors of the Mongols

Episode 3 Nomadic Predecessors of the Mongols

The Mongol Empire

Dr Craig Benjamin (2020)

Film Review

Like the Mongols, earlier nomadic empires (eg the Xiongnu and various Turkic empires)) all lived in portable Gers (Yerts), were killed horse riders, used the composite bow, played board games and sang epic songs.

The Xiongnu

During the 3rd century BC, China’s Chin (Xin) dynasty was plagued by repeated Xiongnu raids. In response, the Chin military trained their own mounted archers, as well as adopting the Xiongnu composite bow, stirrups and trousers. The Chin also built the first 1000-mile earthen Great Wall, attempting to thwart them.

The Xiongnu were first militarized by Touman, though it was his son Modu (who murdered him) who organized them into a formidable fighting force. Modu also adopted saddles with pommels and iron-tipped armor piercing arrows. He also unified warring Xiongnu tribes into a vast confederation.*

After failing to defeat the Xiongnu, the Han Dynasty began paying them tribute, providing royal princesses as brides and formally recognizing all territory north of the Great Wall as belonging to the Xiongnu.

After Emperor Wudi (141-87 BC) adopted an extensive horse breeding and mounted warrior training program, he eventually drove them out of northern and western China. They returned following Wudi’s death, only to be driven back to the steppes after the Xiongnu federation split into two warring factions.**

It was the Xiongnu who established the template for the five great steppe empires that followed. During China’s breakup into warring kingdoms, many Chinese warlords recruited Xiongnu horsemen as mercenaries and a number settled permanently in western China in modern day  Xinjiang  province.

In 398 AD, the Xianbei (descended from Xiongu nomads), established the Wei dynasty in northern China.

The Turks

The Turks formed the next major nomadic steppes confederation, under the leadership of Bumin Qaghan in 545 AD. The confederation split into two Khaganates in 552 AD, with the western Khaganate winning control of the western commercial cities Samarkand (in modern Uzbekistan) and Panjakent (in modern Tajikistan). The eastern khaganate self destructed after a 626 AD famine allowed the Chinese to attack and dissipate the confederation.

They regrouped into a second Turkic Khaganate in 745 AD, that was powerful enough to force the Chinese to pay tribute. The Uighurs gradually took over the steppes from them (744-844 AD) as the Turkic tribes they replaced migrated to the fringes of the Abbassid Caliphate, where they converted to Islam.

The Seljiks (ancestors of the Ottoman Turks) also helped to spread the faith as they migrated westward and hired themselves to the Abbassid Caliphate as mercenaries.

The Jurchen replaced the Seljjiks, and eventually formed the Jin Dynasty in northern China.


*Chingiss Khan would later adopt Modu’s method of military organization, which  was extremely effective in uniting an ethnically and linguistically diverse people. Modu appointed 24 Great Leaders, to a council of state, selecting four of them as Wang (kings): the Wise King of the Left (who ruled the Southeast), the Luli King of the Left (who ruled the Northeast), the Wise King of the Right (the Southwest), and the Luli king of the Right (Northwest). Each of the 24 Great Leaders was in charge of 10,000 cavalry.

**The Huns were possibly descended from one of these factions.

Film can me viewed free with a library card on Kanopy.

https://www.kanopy.com/en/pukeariki/watch/video/12373094/12373100

Paediatrician alarmed at Bill Gates’ plan to inject 500 million children with harmful and unnecessary vaccines

Rhoda Wilson

A prominent paediatrician, Dr. Paul Thomas, has expressed alarm over Bill Gates’ plan to vaccinate 500 million children by 2030 through the $11.9 billion initiative by GAVI. Dr. Thomas warns that the plan is dangerous and unnecessary, advocating instead for a focus on nutrition and overall health.

According to a report published last week by the World Health Organisation (“WHO”) and United Nations Children’s Fund (“UNICEF”), global childhood immunisation rates have stalled, with 84% of children vaccinated in 2023, which has not improved despite efforts. According to the report, this stagnation highlights ongoing challenges in the wake of the covid-19 pandemic, including poor access to health services and fragile, conflict-ridden areas.

The report highlights the reduction in missed doses of “routine” DTP vaccines last year with 13.9 million fewer children receiving all doses in 2022. The report also laments the gaps in measles vaccinations, noting that outbreaks hit 103 countries.

GAVI’s plan aims to vaccinate 500 million children by 2030, with existing and new vaccines, claiming it will avert up to 9 million deaths. The organisation is seeking $9 billion in new pledges of the $11.9 billion needed for the strategic period.

However, Dr. Paul Thomas, who is the author of a study comparing the health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children and others, argued that vaccination programs are unnecessary.  Additionally, he argued, success should be measured on the overall health of the population, not on vaccination rates.

“The less we vaccinate, the healthier the population,” he said.

The paediatrician’s warning highlights the potential risks and unintended consequences of mass vaccination efforts. He told The Defender that the global vaccination programmes continue to use the dangerous whole-cell DTP formulation instead of the less risky acellular version.

The whole-cell vaccine, which contains the entire Bordetella pertussis organism rather than just purified components, has since the 1930s resulted in widespread reports of neurological damage. It was phased out in the US by 1997, but the formulation has continued to be used in low- and middle-income countries, potentially killing millions of children.

Dr. Thomas also doesn’t agree with WHO’s stance on measles.

WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said: “Measles outbreaks are the canary in the coal mine, exposing and exploiting gaps in immunisation and hitting the most vulnerable first.”

Dr. Thomas stated that measles is not a threat to well-nourished, healthy children and that the focus on vaccines as a solution “is destroying the immune systems” of those who are highly vaccinated.

“The focus should be on making sure children of the world have adequate nutrition and adequate support of vitamins A, D and C,” he said.

WHO’s report noted “progress” in some areas of global immunisation including HPV vaccine uptake.

Thomas called the HPV shot “the most dangerous vaccine on the planet other than COVID,” and argued that it “should have been removed from the market long ago.”

“The push to increase vaccine uptake is all about money,” Dr. Thomas said. Adding that GAVI and others involved in financing and increasing vaccine distribution are “a big part of the problem” and called for “a total paradigm shift.”

“Imagine the health and freedom and happiness that could be enjoyed worldwide if we focused on healthy nutrition, and assessed health by looking at all health outcomes when we do an intervention,” he said.

[…]

Via https://expose-news.com/2024/07/22/gates-plan-to-inject-500-million-children/

Biden’s Signature Doesn’t Match Signatures on Executive Orders

Anthony Scott

On Monday, Joe Biden officially dropped out of the 2024 presidential race and endorsed Kamala Harris.

Biden’s sudden decision to drop out of the race did not come through a press conference or an official White House press release but rather from a post on X from Biden’s X account that contained a letter without an official presidential seal.

Biden’s campaign staffers were completely blindsided by Joe Biden’s announcement to drop out of the 2024 race.

‘None of us understand what’s happening,” a staffer told Politico. “We’re all finding out by tweet.”

Shortly after Biden’s announcement letter was released, several journalists noticed Biden’s signature in his announcement letter did not match Biden’s official signature.

Journalist Dr. Naomi Wolf took to X and compared Biden’s official signature, according to Wikipedia, with the most recent signature on his dropout letter.

[…]

Via https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/07/who-wrote-it-internet-buzzes-as-bidens-signature/

GOP Senator Probing Trump Assassination Attempt Floats Second Shooter Theory

 
Modernity
 
Republican Senator Ron Johnson has released preliminary findings of his office’s investigation into the assassination attempt of Donald Trump, also floating the idea that there may have been more than one shooter.

Johnson appeared on Fox News Sunday to discuss the findings, and noted “Was it one rifle? Was it more than one? I’ve seen some pretty interesting video on the internet by experts that does certainly call into question what the FBI is telling us about a single shooter.”

Johnson did not say which video he was specifically referring to, but there has been speculation that a figure was filmed atop the water tower close to the rally site.

“So, are you questioning whether or not there was a second shooter?” host Maria Bartiromo asked, adding “Is that what you’re questioning, or if the shooter had a different gun?”

“I saw an extremely convincing video online, I know it’s all over the place,” Johnson replied, adding “There were three distinct shots early on, followed by another five in more staccato, more rapidly fired, and then the final one, which we believe took the shooter out.”

Aside from the speculation, Johnson noted that his findings include a revelation that the Secret Service did not attend a security briefing given to local SWAT and sniper teams on the morning of July 13.

Johnson, the ranking member on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, also related that Law Enforcement wasn’t even on the same security radio channel as the Secret Service, and the Sniper and Swat teams weren’t on the same channels as patrol officers, or Secret Service either.

Johnson also spoke about a mystery ATF agent who reportedly demanded to be provided copies of photos that the sniper team took of the body of the shooter, Thomas Matthew Crooks.

Johnson stated that no one asked the individual for credentials, initially believing he was with the Secret Service, and investigators now cannot locate the ATF agent.

“We can’t trust the FBI and Secret Service to do an honest and open, transparent investigation. That’s just a very sad fact. We’ve got to rely on other sources,” Johnson urged.

As we highlighted this past weekend, law enforcement officials have leaked details of a briefing they received claiming that the would be assassin of Donald Trump was able to fly a drone over the site of the rally in the morning and get aerial footage.

Johnson’s office also provided a timeline of events in the report, which is reproduced below.

9 a.m. — Butler County Emergency Services held a briefing for the local SWAT and Sniper units from Butler County, Beaver County, and Washington County providing security for Trump’s rally. The briefing outlined the security perimeter for the event and areas of responsibility for each local unit as well as staging locations, including sniper locations, for each local unit and the Secret Service.

Attendees of the briefing said no Secret Service or other federal law enforcement were present for the briefing and that the Secret Service initially did not plan to provide sniper units before changing plans for unclear reasons. It is unknown why the Secret Service did not attend the briefing.
9:27 a.m. — Crooks enters a Home Depot in Bethel Park, Pennsylvania. Video footage of the store reportedly shows him entering alone.
9:41 a.m. — Crooks purchases a 5.5 FT Aluminum Dual Platform ladder.
9:42 a.m. — Crooks exits the Home Depot. Video footage of the parking lot reportedly shows him leaving in a vehicle, although the footage could not identify the make and model of the vehicle.
10:30 a.m. — Two local law enforcement snipers are in position on the second floor inside the AGR building.
5:10 p.m. — Crooks is first seen by one sniper (AGR sniper 1) at the AGR building.
5:14 p.m. — AGR sniper 1 takes pictures of Crooks.
5:28 p.m. — AGR sniper 1 takes a picture of a bicycle and what appears to be two bags near the AGR building, although it is unclear what happened to the bicycle and bags after the day of the shooting.
 5:32 p.m. — AGR sniper 1 observes Crooks looking at his phone and using a rangefinder.
5:38 p.m. — AGR sniper 1 messages the “Sniper Group” about Crooks.
5:40 p.m. — AGR sniper 1 is instructed to “call into command” about Crooks.
5:41 p.m. — AGR sniper 1 calls into command and offers a description of Crooks and the rangefinder, and says Crooks was “lurking around [the] AGR building.”
5:49 p.m. — Photos of Crooks were sent to Butler County Emergency Services Command.
5:55 p.m. — Butler County Emergency Services confirms the photos were received.
5:59 p.m. — Butler County Emergency Services asks which direction Crooks is moving. AGR sniper 1 is initially unsure which direction Crooks is moving.
6:05 p.m. — AGR sniper 1 later says Crooks has a backpack and is moving northeast “in the direction of Sheetz.”
6:06 p.m. to 6:12 p.m. — AGR sniper 1 moves to the ground floor of the building to meet local law enforcement patrol to notify them of Crooks’ presence.
Roughly 6:11 p.m. — Crooks start to open fire, and the Secret Service then returns fire and kills Crooks.
6:23 p.m. — Beaver County SWAT operators step onto the roof where Crooks was stationed and confirm he is dead. Local law enforcement from another county and at least one Secret Service agent also walked onto the roof.
6:46 p.m. — Crooks is patted down when law enforcement finds a transmitter device, Crooks’ phone and the rangefinder in his pockets.
7:45p.m. to 7:46 p.m. — As requested by the Allegheny Bomb Squad, local law enforcement sent pictures of Crooks and the items to an ATF agent. The ATF is reportedly using the pictures of Crooks to run facial recognition.

[…]

Via https://modernity.news/2024/07/22/gop-senator-probing-trump-assassination-attempt-floats-second-shooter-theory/

RFK Jr. Says Vance Is CIA, despite Having a Former CIA Member Running His Own Campaign

CIA Directors Fast Facts - CNN

HP McLovingcraft

RFK Jr. has warned that Trump’s new VP pick, JD Vance, is acting in the interests of the CIA, despite having a former CIA member running his own campaign.

In a clip posted on social media, RFK Jr. excoriates Vance, and by extension Trump, for being corrupt and in thrall to the vested interests of the intelligence community and military-industrial complex.

“His pick as vice president is a salute to the CIA and to the intelligence community and to the military-industrial complex,” said RFK Jr.

“And their gravy train is going to continue.”

Social-media users were quick to point out that RFK Jr. has his own direct ties to the CIA—and they didn’t mean with regard to the assassination of his uncle and father.

Back in October, RFK Jr. replaced his campaign manager, former Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich, with his daughter-in-law, Amaryllis Fox Kennedy.

Amaryllis spent a decade working for the CIA in its “most elite and clandestine operations unit,” according to The National Pulse. In her memoir, she claims to have been deployed to 16 different countries in the hunt for the world’s most dangerous terrorists.

Senior members of the CIA have poured scorn on her account of her time with the organization. William Murray, a CIA operations agent, said, “You don’t go wandering around Karachi on your own… you’ll wind up in some warlord’s harem, or you’ll wind up dead.”

[…]

Via https://hellboundanddown.com/2024/07/22/rfk-jr-says-vance-is-cia-despite-having-a-former-cia-member-running-his-own-campaign/

Biden’s Election Withdrawal Shows Who is Actually Running America

Andrei Dergalin

The timing of Joe Biden’s sudden withdrawal from the presidential race raises questions, argues former US Marine Corps intelligence officer and ex-weapons inspector Scott Ritter.

“There’s no doubt that Joe Biden is unfit to be president of the United States. No doubt. But here’s the question. If he’s unfit to run as the candidate of the Democratic Party, why did they put him up?” former US Marine Corps intelligence officer and ex-weapons inspector Scott Ritter said, noting that signs of Biden’s frailty were visible during the G7 summit in Italy last month.

According to him, the fact that Biden is unfit to be the POTUS but was still allowed to “function” begets the question: who is really in charge in the United States?

“Who’s running America? Because it’s not Joe Biden. We don’t know who. It’s an unelected group of handlers who are drawn from what I guess we can call the establishment. Some people might refer to it as the deep state. And these are the people who are calling the shots,” Ritter stated, noting that “the critical decisions of governance” this group makes are made “for the American people, but not necessarily on behalf of the American people.”

He describes the 2024 presidential election in the US as “a test of American democracy” and a “contest between established elites that are found in the Democratic Party and this surge of populism in the form of Donald Trump who is taking control of the Republican Party.”

Yet while Americans are normally allowed to “have a say in the outcome” of this process, the Democratic Party and the “elites known and unknown” now opted to meddle in this process and “will be selecting who their candidate will be for the presidency in the 2024 elections,” which is “not the way it’s supposed to be,” he noted.

“America is in a crisis, a crisis of democracy, a crisis of identity. And it doesn’t look like we have a solution because for the most part, the American people have been confused and misled and manipulated by the mainstream media into somehow thinking that this is normal,” Ritter lamented.

[…]

Via https://sputnikglobe.com/20240722/scott-ritter-bidens-election-withdrawal-shows-who-is-actually-running-america-1119460529.html

Why is New Zealand one of only three countries with mandatory fluoridation?

Percentages of population receiving fluoridated water, both artificial and natural
Fluoride Free NZ

Up until 2021 local councils were responsible for deciding whether their area was fluoridated or not. However, in 2021 the Labour Government introduced the Fluoridation of Drinking Water Amendment to the Health Act. This put all decision making into the hands of the Director-General of Health.

This move happened as a result of increased debate around New Zealand and councils becoming increasingly uncomfortable about fluoridating and some councils were stopping fluoridation.

In 2015 Stuff reported DHB members comments:

Former Hutt City mayor and fellow board member David Ogden said the anti-fluoridation campaigners needed to be taken seriously. “Having been at a number of public meetings with the anti-fluoridation people there, they have some very strong arguments.”

Hutt City deputy mayor David Bassett said the lobby was winning over more and more councillors. ”The whole vote is actually becoming closer and closer,” Bassett said.

And the situation summed up by another councillor:

“They come with their own group of professionals, eminently qualified and respected people in their area and it places local politicians in a very difficult position,” Ken Laban said.

Councils that stopped:

2012  Ruapehu District Council decided to stop fluoridation of Taumarunui

2012 Central Hawke’s Bay District Council decided to stop fluoridation in Waipukurau

2011 fluoridation was stopped in New Plymouth

2009 the Far North District Council stopped fluoridation of Kaikohe and Kaitaia after a two year experiment

2002 fluoridation was stopped in Ashburton

Other towns had stopped in the 1980s but most had never started.

Councils request central Government take responsibility

In 2014 Fluoride Free New Zealand had a campaign in Kapiti Coast to get fluoridation stopped. The District Council opted to put a remit into Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) to request central Government take control of fluoridation. Their reasoning was that if the Government wanted fluoridation then they should be the ones responsible for the decision rather than putting pressure on the councils to do it.  What they should have done, obviously, was stop fluoridation. At LGNZ two thirds of councils agreed with Kapiti Coast and washed their hands of the issue.

Because of this the National Government took on the issue and introduced legislation in 2016 to shift decision making from local councils to the District Health Boards. A Select Committee Hearing, chaired by then National MP Simon O’Connor, was held in February 2017. 1200 people sent in submissions. All political parties supported the legislation, except New Zealand First that thought it should be decided by local referendum.

In November 2017 Labour, the Greens and New Zealand First formed a coalition after winning enough votes at the election. Mostly due to the efforts of NZ First MP, Clayton Mitchell, the Bill to shift decision making stalled for the whole three year term. Then in 2020 Labour won the election without needing to form a coalition with any other party, and pushed the legislation through. However, by that time, the Labour Government had also disbanded the District Health Boards, so decision making was given to the Director-General of Health (DGH).

The legislation allows the DGH to decide to fluoridate or not to fluoridate. Therefore, we need to remember that the DGH could decide to stop fluoridation for the whole country. Instead, Ashley Bloomfield and now Dr Diana Sarfati, have pushed fluoridation on communities that haven’t wanted it.

The only other countries with similar laws to this are Ireland and Singapore. Nowhere in continental Europe is fluoridated and all other countries that have it, allow the local councils to decide.

New Zealand is out-of-step with the world, out-of-step with human rights, and out of step with modern pharmacology. Listen to Arvid Carlsson, Nobel Prize winner in Medicine (2000) who helped to stop fluoridation in Sweden many years ago.

 

[…]