Episode 29 The Original American Languages Part 3

Dr John McWhorter (2019)

Film Review

Iroquois

The Iroquois family of languages was found mainly around Lake Ontario and Lake Erie, the Finger Lakes in New York state and a few southern coastal areas. These include Oneida, Mohawk, Cherokee, Oneida, Cayuga, Seneca and Erie.

Cherokee has it own writing system devised by a Cherokee blacksmith before Andrew Jackson banished the Cherokee from mainstream America society. Sequohay, who created Cherokee script, referred to the European written language as “talking leaves.” Although he spoke no English, he borrowed the English alphabet to depict Cherokee sounds. Instead of creating a Cherokee alphabet for individual consonants and vowels, he created a “syllabary,” in which English letters represented syllables.

Eventually most Cherokee learned it and in the 1820 began publishing literature in the Cherokee languages. In the 1830s, a Cherokee migrant introduced Sequohay’s syllabary in  Liberia where it was used to transcribe Vai (a Niger Congo language see Niger Congo: Biggest Language Family in Africa).

Hokan

The Hokan family of languages was spoken in Baja California and isolated areas further north. The most widespread Hokan language was Pomo, which had an elaborate system of verb prefixes.

Tanoam and Kayhoan

The Tanoam family of languages was spoken in the four corners states (Utah, Arizona, Colorado and New Mexico), and the Kayhoan family in Oklahoma.

Although these languages persist, they have become simplified over time with exposure to other language groups. For example some have ceased using irregular plurals or using future and/or past tense.

Pidgin Languages

Numerous pidgin languages (see What Are Creole Languages?) have developed with exposure to other indigenous speakers and French and English settlers. One example is Plains Sign Language different tribes used to communicate with one another. Another is Chinook Jargon, a Chinook/Nudge pidgin which was also used by French and English speakers. Although not a full language, it was effective for communicating basic needs.

Other pidgins that developed were Eskimo Jargon, Mobilian Jargon and Delaware Jargon. Swedish settlers spoke a simplified version of Munsee, a Delaware dialect (part of the Algonquin language family), in which they spoke words only without grammatical context.

https://www.kanopy.com/en/pukeariki/watch/video/6120000/6120056

Record numbers of frontline health workers in the U.K. refused the flu vaccine last winter, a decision that media outlets claimed could cripple hospitals with flu outbreaks.

Political commentator Russell Brand highlighted the fallout on a recent episode of his “Stay Free” podcast.

“If we’re supposed to trust the science, why are scientists and people that work in medicine refusing to take vaccines?” Brand asked. “What do they know that we don’t know?”

Fewer than 4 in 10 National Health Service (NHS) workers — just 37% — received the flu vaccine, with rates in some areas falling below 10%, The Daily Mail reported.

The NHS has since issued a “flu jab SOS,” warning that low staff vaccination rates could intensify what officials fear may become a severe 2025 flu season.

Brand said he believes the flu vaccine “revolt” stems from years of deceit and coercion by Big Pharma, government and international bodies such as the World Health Organization, culminating in the “chaos of COVID.”

‘A collapse in confidence over vaccines themselves’

“At the heart of this mistrust is a collapse in confidence over vaccines themselves,” Brand said, arguing that concerns over efficacy, compensation payouts and mandates have all weakened people’s trust.

He cited a Swiss study published in August that found healthcare workers who received a COVID-19 booster were up to 70% more likely to develop flu-like symptoms and miss work than those who skipped the shot, with the increase peaking immediately after vaccination.

An October investigation by The Defender found that one of the largest Medicaid health plans in the U.S. is paying low-income parents hundreds of dollars in gift cards to vaccinate their children.

In July, Ryan Champlin — who coordinates vaccine purchasing contracts for doctors at Cook Children’s Health Care System in Texas — told The Defender that doctors earn extra payments when 80% or more of their patients complete the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule.

A New York Times article, also in July, reported that about half of pediatricians hold “value-based contracts” with insurers. The contracts reward providers with extra payments for meeting specific metrics considered markers of “quality of care.”

In October 2021, as governments worldwide mandated COVID-19 vaccines, New York physician assistant Deborah Conrad was fired for reporting vaccine-related adverse events to the federally run Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System or VAERS. In 2024, Conrad filed a first-of-its-kind lawsuit accusing her former employer, Rochester Regional Health, of defrauding the government by blocking her efforts to file reports.

Brand said COVID-19 vaccine coercion left doctors, nurses and hospital staff around the world reeling. “Tens of thousands of healthcare workers, the same people who were once hailed as heroes, lost their jobs for refusing a shot they didn’t trust,” he said.

In New York alone, an estimated 34,000 healthcare workers either quit, were fired, or were placed on furlough following the vaccine mandate.

“Their livelihoods were destroyed in the name of public health, while political leaders and pharmaceutical executives congratulated themselves for their compassion,” Brand said.

‘Why should we trust them at all?’

Even as efficacy fell and side effects emerged, vaccine makers continued to secure contracts and rake in profits, according to Brand. Governments shielded the drugmakers from liability, indemnifying them against vaccine injuries.

When mistakes occurred, taxpayers — not the corporations — covered the costs, he said.

Brand said in a 2023 episode of his show that corporations often profit from crises using taxpayer money. The federal government funded the development and purchase of Pfizer and Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccines, and if the public pays for them, then they “should share in the benefits,” he argued.

Pfizer reported a record $31.4 billion in profits on sales of $100.3 billion in 2022, while Bill Gates reportedly earned hundreds of millions investing in Pfizer’s partner, BioNTech.

Brand said the fact that up to 90% of NHS frontline workers are skipping the flu vaccine isn’t a “quirk of statistics. It’s a verdict.” He added:

“Their message is the same one millions of ordinary citizens feel but rarely voice. We were lied to, coerced and exploited. And now you ask us to trust you again?

“Science is supposed to question everything. Governments and corporations demanded the opposite. They demanded obedience. And now, as the institutions that broke our trust tried to rebuild it … we must finally ask the only question that matters. Why should we trust them at all?”

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/uk-healthcare-workers-skip-flu-shots-verdict-broken-trust-russell-brand/

Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) introduced a bill this month to protect people’s privacy and consent when they use wearables that track health data.

Cassidy’s bill, the Health Information Privacy Reform Act, would require wearable developers to explicitly notify users that HIPAA’s privacy rules won’t protect their data and offer opt-out features for users who don’t want their data shared.

The bill also calls on U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to direct the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine to study the ethics and implications of paying people to share their health data for research purposes.

According to Cassidy, wearables like smartwatches or Fitbits can be “helpful tools” for managing a patient’s health. However, they also create “privacy concerns that didn’t exist when it was just a patient and a doctor in an exam room.”

“Let’s make sure that Americans’ data is secured and only collected and used with their consent,” he said in a statement.

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) governs traditional provider-patient interactions. “However, HIPAA is failing to keep up with consumer health products that connect individuals to health tools outside of the doctor’s office,” Cassidy’s press release stated.

Ted Claypoole, legal expert and cyberspace law committee chair of the American Bar Association, who reviewed Cassidy’s bill, told The Defender it addressed “some of the obvious holes” in current HIPAA coverage.

However, Claypoole said the legislation “does not seem to address the other major privacy concern of location tracking.” He said he would like to see federal legislation that limits companies’ ability to track and share people’s locations.

State bills target ‘neural data’ concerns

Cassidy’s bill is part of a trend among federal and state lawmakers to address privacy and consent concerns arising from wearables.

In April, several Democratic senators asked the Federal Trade Commission to protect consumers’ neural data from being exploited or sold. Neural data can reveal a person’s mental health conditions, emotional states and cognitive patterns.

Wearables that track neural data via EEG (electroencephalogram) waves that detect electrical activity in the brain are already on the market. For instance, Neurable sells a noise-cancelling headset with EEG sensors for $499 that the company says boosts focus and lowers stress.

Emotiv’s Bluetooth-enabled ear buds, priced at $399, also use EEG sensors to measure brainwaves.

Massachusetts is among several states that have introduced legislation seeking to protect people’s neural data. And lawmakers in Illinois are considering a bill that would update the state’s Biometric Information Privacy Act to require written consent from wearables users before companies collect their neural data.

In Minnesota, lawmakers are considering a bill that would require companies and governmental agencies to obtain informed consent before collecting neural data.

State Sen. Eric Lucero, the bill’s primary author, told The Defender he’s concerned that private sector companies, government agencies, and individual threat actors pose a risk to manipulating people’s neural data without their consent.

Lucero, a technologist who worked in cybersecurity for over 20 years before taking office, said he first proposed a version of the bill in 2020, several years after Google Glass first came out. Google’s product used eye movements, rather than a mouse and keyboard, to connect a person to a computer.

That’s when Lucero realized that the human-computer interface was evolving and computers would likely soon be able to directly connect to people’s brains — as Elon Musk has done with his Neuralink brain implant.

As of Sept. 10, a dozen people have been implanted with Neuralink, according to PC Mag.

“If the technology exists to read brainwaves, it’s a hop, skip, and a jump to be able to have the technology to write brainwaves,” Lucero said. In other words, it may soon be possible for someone to manipulate a person’s brainwaves.

Lucero pointed out that several movies in recent years, including “Inception” and “Johnny Mnemonic,” depicted characters who had thoughts implanted by people outside of them.

Five years ago, Lucero’s bill didn’t get much traction, but now that’s changing. This year, state Sen. Erin K. Maye Quade, a member of the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, joined him in co-sponsoring the legislation.

If passed, the bill would make it illegal for a person, company or agency to read or implant thoughts or brainwaves into a person’s mind without their consent.

Lucero added:

“I have no problem if people want to share their data with technology companies or any other relationship that’s outside of the patient-doctor relationship, that’s fine. It just needs to be done with affirmative consent — not a passive or an implied consent.

“And not a default position of it is assumed you’re opted in unless you expressly opt out. It needs to be that you are opted out as the default position unless you affirmatively opt in.”

In 2021, Chile became the first country in the world to amend its constitution to protect people’s neurodata and mental privacy.

Wearables a contentious issue among health freedom advocates

Both wearables and implants that track biometrics not only pose privacy and consent concerns but also may increase the user’s exposure to wireless radiation, according to Miriam Eckenfels, director of Children’s Health Defense’s (CHD) Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) & Wireless Program.

She noted that Kennedy caused an uproar among supporters when he said during his June congressional testimony:

“We’re about to launch one of the biggest advertising campaigns in HHS [U.S. Department of Health & Human Services] history to encourage Americans to use wearables … my vision is that every American is wearing a wearable within four years.”

“We do not share this vision,” Eckenfels said. “Quite the contrary, we oppose governmental pressure to incentivize the widespread use of wearables. They pose serious health risks, especially to children, and they threaten privacy.”

Kennedy later clarified in a conversation with author Charles Eisenstein that he simply wanted wearables to be “universally available as one of the ways people can get on top of their health.”

Kennedy told Eisenstein:

“Of course I don’t want to mandate it. And the idea of everyone’s body being hooked up to a data center somewhere is horrifying. This data should be private, and when it is shared with the device provider it must be subject to health privacy laws.”

Eisenstein was Kennedy’s chief speechwriter during his presidential campaign and recently moderated a panel of “spellers,” non-speaking young adults with autism, at CHD’s “Moment of Truth” conference last weekend.

When The Defender asked if Kennedy supported Cassidy’s bill, an HHS spokesperson said HHS does not comment on potential or pending legislation.

Cassidy did not immediately respond to our comment request.

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cassidy-introduces-bill-require-clear-consent-wearables-share-users-health-data/?utm_id=20251116

By Brian Shilhavy

Trump caved in Sunday night to the foregone conclusion that the GOP-led House was going to go against his wishes and vote to release the Epstein files, and actually told the Republicans to go ahead and vote for it, because he had “nothing to hide.”

I would be surprised now if anyone in the House will refuse to sign on. It may pass 435 to 0.

Then what happens in the Senate? It would be hard to imagine that they will not follow suit, passing the bill to Trump to sign.

Then the big question will be: Are they really releasing the files, or just more stuff already out in the public domain as Pam Bondi did earlier this year? I doubt they will release any of the videos, claiming that they are protecting the victims.

From Politico (https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/11/17/congress/trump-epstein-files-house-vote-update-00654109):

President Donald Trump is coming to grips with his impending loss on the Jeffrey Epstein files and a rare moment of tenuous control over the House GOP.

In a late Sunday Truth Social post, Trump said House Republicans should vote to release DOJ records on the late convicted sex offender “because we have nothing to hide.”

“I DON’T CARE!” he said. “All I do care about is that Republicans get BACK ON POINT.”

Trump’s reversal after a monthslong pressure campaign came as dozens of Republicans — perhaps as many as 100 — were already poised to break with him in a vote Tuesday. Even close allies of GOP leadership were weighing whether to defect from the president.

“I’m a big full disclosure person,” said House Rules Chair Virginia Foxx, a trusted member in Speaker Mike Johnson’s inner circle, who declined to say how she would vote. “I have nothing to hide, and I assume nobody else does, either.

Trump’s edict is just about the House, two White House officials tell POLITICO. It amounts to a face-saving move ahead of a vote he was going to lose, and at this point it’s still likely the matter dies in the Senate.

[…]

Via https://t.me/healthimpact/2852

In early October, Israeli-Ukrainian Boris Wolfman was arrested in Russia. He is charged with masterminding a criminal organ trafficking scheme. His capture, wholly ignored by the Western media, raises the prospect that at long last, some justice will be served in a number of major organ trafficking scandals, dating back many years. Wolfman’s apprehension also highlights Tel Aviv’s little-scrutinised role as the world’s centre of illegal organ harvesting and trafficking. Grimly, the Gaza genocide may have greatly facilitated this perverse commerce.

Ever since October 7th, credible allegations have widely circulated that Zionist Occupation Forces are illegally harvesting the organs of slain Palestinians. In November 2023, the Euro-Med Monitor published a report documenting how Israeli soldiers confiscated dozens of corpses from major hospitals in Gaza, to the extent of digging up and raiding mass graves built in their grounds to accommodate the never-ending influx of slaughtered civilians. While some bodies were subsequently handed over to the Red Cross, many were and remain withheld.

Euro-Med Monitor records how many corpses exhibited clear indications of organ harvesting, including missing cochleas and corneas, as well as hearts, kidneys, and livers. Since then, the Zionist entity has released token numbers of murdered Palestinians at intermittent intervals to their surviving relatives. Frequently, the bodies are decomposed beyond recognition, making conducting professional autopsies – and identifying whether organs have been stolen – difficult if not impossible. Sometimes, the corpses are frozen solid, again greatly complicating medical examinations, and potentially obscuring organ theft.

The 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention mandates respect for the dignity of dead civilians, and explicitly prohibits the looting or mutilation of their bodies during wartime. However, the Zionist entity has not only failed to ratify the treaty, but expressly rejects its applicability to Gaza and the illegally-occupied West Bank. Moreover, repulsive local laws and legal precedents unique to Tel Aviv grant authorities the power to refuse to release dead Palestinians to their families.

Their bodies can be used as grisly bargaining chips – or their organs looted with impunity. For decades, the Zionist entity has been the illicit organ trade’s international nucleus. While Palestinians have long-raised alarm over Tel Aviv’s theft of their fallen comrades’ organs, it was not until the early 2000s that the practice was officially admitted. Yehuda Hiss, head of “Israel’s” Abu Kabir Institute, openly boasted of harvesting skin, bones, and other human materials during autopsies. He was never punished, suggesting his macabre activities were state-sanctioned.

This interpretation is amply reinforced by former Institute employee Meira Weiss’ 2014 work Over Their Dead Bodies. She reveals how, during the First Intifada 1987 – 1993, ZOF officials directed the centre “to harvest organs from Palestinians using a military regulation that an autopsy must be conducted on every killed Palestinian.” This gave them free rein to seize whatever they wished from bodies in their care. Institute apparatchiks nostalgically referred to these years as the “good days”, as they could pilfer organs “consistently and freely”.

Disturbingly, the Gaza genocide’s catastrophic death toll may represent the dawning of a new era of “good days” for the Zionist entity’s organ trade. Wolfman’s arrest, and the collapse of the conspiracies he oversaw, are unlikely to dent Tel Aviv’s operations in the field. He was but one player in a world-spanning nexus of Israeli traffickers. In the manner of a hydra, Wolfman’s removal will simply lead to others taking his place. After all, the returns are high, and risks mysteriously low.

‘Organ Broker’

In July 2015, the European Parliament issued a landmark report on organ trafficking. Its introduction notes, “before 2000, the problem of trafficking in human organs…was primarily limited to the Indian subcontinent and Southeast Asia.” However, the report noted that following the turn of the millennium, “trafficking in organs has seemingly started to spread globally, to a large extent driven by Israeli doctors.” The document went on to detail a number of high-profile organ trafficking cases.

In all but one, the evidentiary trail led directly back to the Zionist entity. An accompanying map of international organ trade routes places Tel Aviv at the very core, with its citizens both being leading customers, and heading the gangs that supply organs to overseas buyers. One cited case was the exposure in 2003 of a leading South African hospital performing over 100 illegal transplants on overseas patients – “the majority” from “Israel”.

Local law enforcement uncovered how a criminal syndicate led by well-connected Israeli Ilan Perry recruited poor, desperate individuals from Brazil, Romania, and elsewhere who were willing to sell their organs for a token sum, then transported them to South Africa. Customers would pay vast amounts for the transplants – Perry, the “organ broker”, and his associates would pocket the bulk, with the rest paid to ‘donors’ and hospital staff to perform the illegal procedures, then keep quiet about the connivance.

Another cited case is the Medicus Clinic scandal in Pristina, Kosovo. It erupted in October 2008, when a young Turkish man collapsed at the city’s airport. After a fresh surgical scar was found on his abdomen, he explained his kidney had been removed at the clinic, leading to a police raid. Medicus was already on local law enforcement’s radar due to the profusion of foreigners arriving in Pristina with letters of invitation to the clinic for heart treatment, which Medicus was not known to provide.

Subsequent investigations revealed Israeli Moshe Harel and Turkish doctor Yusuf Sonmez – known as “the world’s most renowned organ trafficker” – were responsible for sourcing clientele, who paid in excess of $100,000 for transplants. The surgeries were primarily conducted by local Kosovo Albanian medical professionals. Patients spent a short period in recovery before being discharged, provided with “information on their treatment to present to doctors in their home countries.” Donors did not enjoy such charity.

As the EU report notes, suppliers were forced to sign documents attesting they were donating their organs “voluntarily to a relative or altruistically to a stranger.” These documents were written in Albanian, and not translated to them. While in some cases they were promised fees of up to $30,000, “a number of them received only part of the money and some nothing at all.” Those given a portion were told they’d get the remainder “on condition that they themselves would recruit other ‘donors’.”

‘Notable Price’

Boris Wolfman was also centrally embroiled in Medicus. While a wanted man in multiple jurisdictions and subject to an Interpol red notice, he remained at large in Turkey for years until his recent deportation to Russia. Incredibly, he kickstarted another organ trafficking venture in the meantime, exploiting vulnerable Kenyans for small sums, selling their kidneys et al. to wealthy buyers from Germany and “Israel” for up to $200,000. As in Kosovo, donors were not given the money promised, or provided with appropriate medical care post-procedure.

It remains to be seen what, if any light, his prosecution will shed on the wider criminal network in which he operated, or whether the Zionist entity might be directly implicated in Wolfman’s venture. Still, that he is facing trial at all is somewhat miraculous. His confederates in the Medicus horror have proven suspiciously impervious to legal repercussions for their monstrous activities. Sonmez likewise lived freely and openly in Turkey for some years after the conspiracy’s unravelling, despite facing criminal charges in multiple countries.

Turkish prosecutors sought to jail him for 171 years, but Sonmez never served a day in prison, and appears to have vanished without a trace. Meanwhile, Harel was arrested by Israeli police in 2012, only to be released. He was nabbed again in Cyprus six years later on an Interpol warrant, but demands from Kosovo authorities he be extradited inexplicably appear to have not been acted upon. Whether the pair’s continuing liberty is indicative of state protection is an open, obvious question.

The Zionist entity’s 21st-century Holocaust in Gaza, and disastrously failed wars against Hezbollah and Iran, have “exacted a notable price” on its finances, Focus Economics has recorded. For example, tourism – once a core component of “Israel’s” income – has shrunk from millions of visitors annually to almost literally zero. “A full recovery could take multiple years and is likely dependent on a permanent end to hostilities with Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran,” the outlet forecasts – fantastically, given the Resistance cannot peacefully coexist with Tel Aviv.

Meanwhile, the Zionist entity continues to suffer mass brain drain, foreign investor flight, diplomatic isolation, and a huge drop in confidence among its largest overseas trading partners. Grotesquely, organ trafficking might represent one of Tel Aviv’s few dependable profit sources at this stage. With thousands of Palestinians both dead and alive in its custody, “Israel” certainly has ample resources to fuel the trade. Mainstream blackout on Wolfman’s long-overdue arrest may indicate the entity’s overseas puppet masters are relaxed about the prospect.

[…]

Via https://english.almayadeen.net/articles/analysis/the-global-zionist-organ-trafficking-conspiracy

BettBeat Media

The same psychological traits that enable billionaires to destroy millions of lives for profit also enable them to rape children—and capitalism rewards both forms of predation.

The question haunts every honest observer of power: Why do sexual predators rise to the pinnacles of capitalist society with such disturbing regularity? Why does the same system that rewards the pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, the alleged child molester Woody Allen, the rapist Harvey Weinstein, and countless other monsters also elevating them to positions where they can inflict maximum damage? The answer reveals the most horrifying truth about our economic system—capitalism doesn’t just tolerate sexual predation, it actively selects for it.

The Epstein case exposes a terrifying pattern that extends far beyond one billionaire’s island of horrors. The psychological mechanisms that drive powerful men to sexually abuse children—the ultimate form of exploitation, the need for absolute dominance, the complete dehumanization of others, the divorce from empathy—are precisely the same mechanisms that capitalism rewards in its most successful practitioners. This is not coincidence. This is selection pressure.

The Predator’s Advantage

Consider the psychological profile of the successful pedophile: They must be master manipulators, capable of identifying and exploiting vulnerability. They must possess an almost supernatural ability to compartmentalize, maintaining public personas while committing unspeakable acts in private. They must be skilled at reading power dynamics, understanding instinctively who can be victimized and who must be courted. They must be comfortable with the complete objectification of other human beings, viewing them as resources to be consumed rather than people deserving dignity.

Now consider the psychological profile of the successful capitalist: They must be master manipulators, capable of identifying and exploiting market vulnerabilities. They must possess an almost supernatural ability to compartmentalize, maintaining public philanthropy while devastating communities in private. They must be skilled at reading power dynamics, understanding instinctively who can be exploited and who must be courted. They must be comfortable with the complete objectification of other human beings, viewing workers as resources to be consumed rather than people deserving dignity.

The overlap is not accidental—it is systemic. Capitalism rewards psychopathy because psychopathy is useful to capital accumulation. The same emotional architecture that allows a man to rape a child also allows him to foreclose on a family’s home, to dump toxic waste in poor communities, to lobby against cancer treatment funding while profiting from carcinogenic products. The capacity for dehumanization is not a bug in the capitalist system—it is the essential feature.

The Epstein Network as Capitalist Laboratory

Jeffrey Epstein’s operation was not an aberration but a perfect expression of capitalist logic. His island served as both a laboratory for sexual domination and a networking hub for economic domination. The same men who raped children on Epstein’s planes were simultaneously pillaging entire economies through their hedge funds and private equity firms. Bill Clinton, who flew on the “Lolita Express” many times, also championed the financial deregulation that enabled the 2008 economic collapse. Donald Trump, who allegedly raped a 13-year-old girl at Epstein’s Manhattan mansion, built his real estate empire through systematic exploitation of contractors and workers.

The connection runs deeper than shared moral bankruptcy. Sexual predation and economic predation require identical psychological tools: the ability to identify the vulnerable, the skill to isolate them from support systems, the capacity to exploit power imbalances, and the willingness to destroy lives for personal gratification. Epstein’s genius was recognizing that men who had perfected these skills in the economic realm would eagerly apply them in the sexual realm.

This explains why Epstein’s client list reads like a who’s who of global capitalism: hedge fund managers, investment bankers, real estate moguls, media executives, and their political enablers. These were not wealthy men who happened to be pedophiles—they were pedophiles who became wealthy precisely because the psychological traits that enable sexual predation also enable economic predation under capitalism. And because economic power enables sexual power over children.

The Israeli Connection: Where Imperialism Meets Sexual Violence

The tentacles of Epstein’s network inevitably lead back to Israel, that laboratory of racist capitalist brutality disguised as ‘democracy’. Multiple sources suggest that Epstein operated as a Mossad asset, using sexual blackmail to control political and economic elites on behalf of Israeli interests. This connection is not surprising—it is inevitable. Israel represents the purest distillation of predatory capitalism combined with colonial violence, a system that requires the complete dehumanization of its Palestinian victims.

The psychological profile of the settler who burns Palestinian children alive in their homes, kidnaps and disappears 8-year-old Palestinian girls, and beats up Palestinian old ladies with laughter is identical to the psychological profile of the billionaire who profits from child labor in his factories: both require the complete severance of empathy, the total objectification of their victims, and the ability to justify any atrocity in service of their desires. The Israeli state that operates the world’s largest open-air prison in Gaza while claiming to be a beacon of civilization operates according to the same logic as the capitalist who imposes starvation wages while lecturing about ‘economic freedom’.
Western corporations are linked to child labor in Africa, particularly in the cocoa and cobalt supply chains in West Africa and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Major companies like Nestlé, Mars, Cargill, Apple, Google, and Tesla have faced lawsuits and international scrutiny for their alleged roles in these practices

Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s primary accomplice, was the daughter of Robert Maxwell, a media mogul with extensive ties to Israeli intelligence. The operation’s sophisticated surveillance capabilities, international scope, and protection from prosecution all bear the hallmarks of state-level intelligence operations. But more than operational support, Israel provided the ideological framework that made Epstein’s crimes possible: the belief that some humans are inherently superior to others and therefore entitled to use inferior humans as objects for their pleasure.

Superior Jewish DNA

The same supremacist ideology that allows Israelis to shoot Palestinian children for sport also allows billionaires to destroy the lives of workers’ children through environmental destruction, healthcare denial, and educational defunding. Sexual predation and imperial predation spring from the same poisoned well of human supremacy that capitalism depends upon for its existence.

Surprisingly yet unsurprisingly, Epstein was a devoted believer in eugenics—the pseudoscientific 19th-century racist ideology that his own Jewish ancestors had been victimized by—and harbored grandiose fantasies of seeding the human race with what he considered his “superior Jewish DNA.” The irony was lost on him: a man who embodied every antisemitic stereotype about Jewish financial manipulation and sexual degeneracy had reinvented himself as the master race. Epstein’s eugenics obsession reveals the final psychological piece of the predator-capitalist puzzle—the megalomaniacal belief that wealth proves genetic superiority, that economic domination justifies any form of human breeding program, and that the right to rape and reproduce flows naturally from the right to buy and sell.

His New Mexico ranch was reportedly intended as a breeding facility where he would impregnate multiple women to spread his “superior” genes—the ultimate fusion of sexual predation, capitalist accumulation, and fascist ideology. The man who trafficked children for billionaire rapists saw himself not as a criminal but as an evolutionary benefactor, using his wealth to “improve” the species through forced reproduction. Capitalism had so thoroughly warped his psychology that he genuinely believed his financial success proved his genetic worth.

The Silence for Capital

The most damning evidence of capitalism’s complicity in sexual predation is not what it does but what it refuses to see. Despite overwhelming evidence of systematic child abuse among the global elite, the mainstream media treats each revelation as an isolated scandal rather than a systemic feature. Despite clear patterns linking economic power to sexual violence, academia refuses to examine the connection. Despite obvious signs that pedophile networks operate at the highest levels of government and finance, law enforcement consistently fails to investigate or prosecute.

This silence is not incompetence—it is self-preservation. Capitalism cannot afford to acknowledge that its most successful practitioners are also its most depraved predators because this would expose the moral bankruptcy at the system’s core. The same corporate media that celebrates billionaire “philanthropy” cannot simultaneously expose billionaire child rape, genocide and theft without undermining the entire mythology of virtuous wealth creation.

The legal system that protects corporate criminals from accountability cannot suddenly develop a conscience about sexual criminals without calling attention to its systematic bias in favor of wealth and power. The political establishment that serves corporate interests cannot prosecute the sexual crimes of their financial backers without severing their own sources of funding and support.

The Fascist Trajectory

The same psychological mechanisms that enable the abuse of individual children also enable the abuse of entire populations. The billionaire who can rape a child with no sense of moral conflict can also engineer famines, fund genocides, and destroy democracies with equal emotional detachment.

This is why every fascist movement in history has been funded and supported by capitalist elites: fascism is simply capitalism with its mask removed, the open acknowledgment that some humans exist only to serve the pleasures and profits of others. The concentration camps of Nazi Germany were built by the same corporate executives who built the factories that exploited workers to death. The genocide in Gaza is funded by the same billionaires who profit from the destruction of Palestinian society.

Sexual predation against children represents the ultimate expression of this fascist logic: the complete negation of another human being’s autonomy, dignity, and right to exist as anything other than an object for consumption. Once this psychological barrier has been crossed—once a person becomes capable of sexually abusing a child—no other moral boundary can restrain them. They become capable of any atrocity in service of their desires.

Breaking the Silence, Breaking the System

The connection between pedophilia and capitalist success is not a conspiracy theory—it is an observable pattern that demands explanation. That explanation reveals the most uncomfortable truth about our economic system: it does not reward virtue, innovation, or social contribution. It rewards the capacity for predation, the willingness to treat other humans as consumable resources, and the ability to sever all emotional connection to the suffering one causes.

Jeffrey Epstein was not a monster who happened to be rich—he was rich because he was a monster. His wealth came not from productive economic activity but from his willingness to provide other monsters with access to victims they could not obtain through their own efforts. His clients were not wealthy men who happened to be pedophiles—they were pedophiles who became wealthy because capitalism rewards the psychological traits that enable both sexual and economic predation.

The Epstein network reveals capitalism in its purest form: a system where those most willing to inflict suffering rise to positions where they can inflict maximum suffering. The children destroyed on Epstein’s island are not fundamentally different from the children destroyed in sweatshops, the children poisoned by industrial pollution, the children murdered by American bombs purchased with taxpayer money. All are victims of the same system, sacrificed to the same gods of profit and power.

Breaking this system requires more than prosecuting individual predators—it requires acknowledging that predation is not a bug in capitalism but its essential feature. It requires recognizing that the same system that elevates pedophiles to positions of supreme power will never voluntarily reform itself. It requires understanding that the choice before us is not between different types of capitalism but between capitalism and human survival.

[…]

Via https://libya360.wordpress.com/2025/11/16/why-are-pedophiles-the-most-successful-capitalists/

Brian Shilhavy

MAGA is quickly becoming splintered due to Trump’s stance on the Epstein files. This can be clearly seen in the comments on an article published yesterday on ZerohHedge News, the pro-Trump Libertarian publication, regarding Trump’s attacks against Marjorie Taylor Greene (https://www.zerohedge.com/political/friday-night-meltdown-trump-yanks-mtg-endorsement-mocks-massies-remarriage-after-wifes) and Thomas Massie.

There are nearly 5000 comments, and pro-Trump diehards for the first time I have seen in years, were soundly outnumbered by those defending Massie and MTG by about 4 to 1, at least.

The libertarian defectors have even come up with their new acronym to contrast the TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) that the MAGA faithful use to express their world view that anything negative about Trump is TDS.

The new acronym is TSS (Trump Stockholm Syndrome.)

Here is the Cleveland Clinic’s definition of “Stockholm Syndrome (https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/22387-stockholm-syndrome)”:

“Stockholm syndrome is a coping mechanism to a captive or abusive situation. People develop positive feelings toward their captors or abusers over time. This condition applies to situations including child abuse, coach-athlete abuse, relationship abuse and sex trafficking. Treatment includes psychotherapy (“talk therapy”) and medications if needed.”

My opinion: Trump will soon be out of office, as the GOP jumps ship and tries to correct course before the mid-term elections, which at this rate will be a blood bath for the GOP, and a probable impeachment of Trump.

Be on the lookout for false flag events next week as Massie’s bill comes to the floor of the House for a vote.

And remember, if a mass casualty even happens on the magnitude of 911, there is a 99.99% chance the U.S. government is behind it, but blaming it on China, Russia, Iran, [fill in the blank].

Of course with this administration, they might blame it on the “Commie Left Wing Lunatics”, and perhaps throw in the “antisemitism” label while going after Massie, MTG, Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens and anyone else they see standing in their way.

[…]

Via https://t.me/healthimpact/2849

Episode 28 The Original American Languages Part 2

Dr John McWhorter (2019)

Film Review

The last family of American languages to emerge, the Aleut languages were spoken in Alaska, northern Canada and eastern Siberia.  After the first migration out of Siberia 20,000 years ago, there were three additional migrations, 5,000, 2,800 and 1,000 years ago.

There are two primary Aleut languages: Yupik (spoken in Alaska and Siberia), which is nearly extinct,s and Inuktitut (aka Greenlandic), spoken in Greenland. Inuktitut is one of Greenland’s official languages and is taught in school. Aleut languages tend to use really long words to convey full sentences (known as polysynthesis).

Algonquin Famil

The Algonquin family of languages was mainly spoken on the US East Coast and eastern Canada. However two Algonquin subfamilies, Yurok and and Wiok, were spoken in Western California. This suggests Algonquin languages were once widespread across the American continent before being displaced by other languages.

Most English borrowed words are Algonquin, eg squash and papoose. Most indigenous Americans who became famous for helping European settlers spoke Algonquin languages. Squanto, who helped the Plymouth Rock settlers, spoke Narragansett and Poccahantes spoke Powhata. Munsee was the language spoken on Manhattan Island.

West Coast Families

There were 78 indigenous languages belonging to five different families spoken in California and northwest Canada. Most belonged to the Penutian family, like Yokuts and Miwok (the latter using case markings as in Latin or Russian), which was spoken in central California.

https://www.kanopy.com/en/pukeariki/watch/video/6120000/6120058