Thinkcivics Newswire

Dr. Pierre Kory of Frontline Doctors recently tweeted this — “Between 100-200 United States Congress Members (plus many of their staffers and family members) with COVID.. were treated by a colleague over the past 15 months with ivermectin & the I-MASK+ protocol. None have gone to hospital.”

Fun fact: Between 100-200 United States Congress Members (plus many of their staffers & family members) with COVID.. were treated by a colleague over the past 15 months with ivermectin & the I-MASK+ protocol at https://t.co/OvU8SLfLJq. None have gone to hospital. Just sayin’

— Pierre Kory, MD MPA (@PierreKory) October 8, 2021

To all the comments asking for his sources/names for the below:

To all the comments asking for sources/names for the below:

1) This came from a highly credible source inside Congress who has asked to remain anonymous
2) I would never divulge the medical treatments of individual members, nor do I know them myself

I fully stand by this tweet. https://t.co/Vt6UJ2K7sT

— Pierre Kory, MD MPA (@PierreKory) October 8, 2021

***BREAKING SCANDAL***

FACT:
Between 100-200 members of Congress and their families & staffers have been treated with IVM & our I-MASK+ protocol for COVID. NO hospitalizations.

Not one of them reported that to the people.

Saved themselves & stayed silent as IVM was torched. https://t.co/qDAgFGjVq1

— Frontline Covid-19 Critical Care (@Covid19Critical) October 8, 2021

[…]

Via https://thinkcivics.com/frontline-doc-100-200-members-of-congress-treated-with-ivermectin/

By Jermey Kuzmarov

Covert Action Magazine

In June 2021, Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) told U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris in Mexico City that he wanted to end military cooperation in fighting drug trafficking and to instead promote economic development.

“We don’t want military cooperation,” he said, “we don’t want it to be like it was before when they brought us a helicopter gunship and a photo was taken of the U.S. ambassador with the president,” he said.

“We want development cooperation. We don’t even want to hear about the Merida Plan anymore.”

Launched in 2008, the Mérida Initiative aimed to combat drug trafficking with U.S. military equipment, technical support, and training for security forces in Mexico and Central America, which have received billions of dollars in aid.

AMLO argues that investing in development projects would help counter not only drug trafficking but also migrant flows.

On a visit to Mexico City last week, Secretary of State Antony Blinken pledged to replace the Mérida initiative with a new bicentennial framework—though by all indication, the Biden administration remains committed to a “muscular approach to combating drug gangs,” as the U.S. News & World Report put it.

President Biden, a life-long drug warrior, is being arm-twisted into keeping the failed, murderous “War on Drugs” going by numerous U.S. stakeholders to whom he is beholden.

They include: a) the U.S. banks which launder the billions in drug money; b) the weapons makers which get money from the U.S. government, which buys the weapons and gives them to the Mexican army and police, and which also receive money from the narco-gangs which buy huge amounts of weapons on their own; c) the Republicans who will use a U.S. withdrawal from the War on Drugs as a club with which to scare the population and beat the Democrats in coming elections; and d) the huge numbers of  U.S. police, border patrols, DEA agents, and a multitude of others whose jobs and livelihoods depend on continuing the drug war.

Defiant Stance Warranted

Benjamin T. Smith’s new book The Dope: The Real History of the Mexican Drug Trade (W.W. Norton, 2021) is the most comprehensive yet in detailing the violence and corruption associated with the War on Drugs in Mexico, a war that can never be won since demand for drugs in the U.S. is too high and wage levels in Mexico are too low.

Rather than halting the supply rate, Smith shows that aggressive counter-narcotics policing causes traffickers to turn on one another while intensifying competition for control over rackets.

The loosening of gun restrictions—exemplified by President George W. Bush’s rescinding in 2004 of the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act preventing the sale of semi-automatic assault weapons to civilians—has given cartel members easier access to firearms, resulting in a spiraling murder rate.

Back in the Good Old Days

According to Smith, the Mexican drug trade, until the 1970s, was relatively peaceful—certainly by today’s standards.

In the first decades of the twentieth century, it was controlled by small-scale networks of pharmacists, criminals, farmers, and merchants who were protected by local politicians who adopted a model of cooperation.

[…]

Via https://covertactionmagazine.com/2021/10/11/mexican-president-amlo-begs-biden-to-end-failed-trillion-dollar-war-on-drugs-but-powerful-u-s-interests-prefer-deadly-status-quo/

From PFC volunteer Roger

Prepare for Change

Figures reported through the UK’s Yellow Card scheme, VAERS in the US and EudraVigilance in Europe indicate that the experimental injections have already killed more people in a few months than more than 70 other vaccines put together over the previous 30 years.

https://yellowcard.ukcolumn.org/yellow-card-reports

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

According to Dr Joseph Mercola, writing in the August-September 2021 Nexus Magazine, the statistics mean the Covid jabs are about 500 times as deadly as the seasonal flu vaccine and seven times more dangerous than the H1N1 jab.

Yet the scary stats remain largely unreported to the public.

Why? Because censorship and propaganda are causing mainstream media to present a one-sided picture to their audiences.

SAGE, the scientific advisory group, specifically advised the UK government in March 2020 to “use media to increase sense of personal threat” among the public.

And that’s why a group of British journalists have launched Holding the Line: Journalists Against Covid Censorship. And they are keen to invite others to join them in the fight.

Their aim is to help restore balance to the Covid/vaccine debate and educate fellow journalists and the wider public about the facts, figures and scientific opinions that are being censored across the mainstream.

A spokesperson for Holding the Line said: “If you look behind the curtain of propaganda, it soon becomes obvious that virtually nothing has been fully and accurately reported.

“An early example is the reporting of so-called Covid deaths.

“As most people now know, these are not necessarily Covid deaths at all but deaths of people who tested positive in the previous 28 days mostly using a PCR test that doctors, scientists and even the World Health Organisation say produces false positives.

“Law courts in Portugal and Austria have already declared PCR tests unreliable yet they were the basis of worldwide lockdowns and crackdowns on personal freedom.

https://www.theportugalnews.com/news/2020-11-27/covid-pcr-test-reliability-doubtful-portugal-judges/56962

“Forced to provide verified mortality data, a Portuguese court ruled that of 17,000 alleged ‘covid deaths’ between January 2020 and April 2021, only 152 were actually from Covid.

https://greatgameindia.com/lisbon-court-death-covid-cases/

“The other 16,848 embraced a whole range of death causes including accidents.”

The spokesperson stressed that the group’s aims did not include “having a go” at fellow journalists.

He said: “Many journalists are being misled like everyone else and even those that are aware often find their hands tied by publishers and editors who are following the official agenda.

“We know freelancers who have been blacklisted by media outlets for seeking to write balanced stories that challenge Covid narratives that have been established in the mainstream media through constant repetition rather than being built on scientific data.

“Others have been warned that they could be in breach of contract if they cross the line.

“One of our members received an official warning from her newspaper.

“Another was taken off air by his radio station for being too ‘controversial’.

“A third has been branded as a ‘conspiracy theorist’ for putting forward a story that questioned the safety of the Covid injections.”

The spokesperson said there was a popular myth that anything that failed to tie in with the governmental narrative was social media “disinformation” from so-called anti-vaxxers.

“That is plain wrong,” he said.

“Hundreds of doctors, virologists, bacteriologists and other scientists are seeing their posts removed from the internet on a daily basis simply because their studies and views disagree with the official narrative.

[…]

Via https://prepareforchange.net/2021/10/10/journalists-aim-to-expose-covid-censorship/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=journalists-aim-to-expose-covid-censorship

Source: Jamie White

NWO

Southwest Airlines cancelled thousands of flights over the weekend, citing air traffic control issues and “disruptive weather.”

“ATC issues and disruptive weather have resulted in a high volume of cancellations throughout the weekend while we work to recover our operation,” the airline said in a tweet Saturday.

ATC issues and disruptive weather have resulted in a high volume of cancellations throughout the weekend while we work to recover our operation. We appreciate your patience as we accommodate affected Customers, and Customer Service wait times are longer than usual. (1/2) pic.twitter.com/o1scQJ5lLb

— Southwest Airlines (@SouthwestAir) October 9, 2021

“We are working hard behind the scenes to minimize challenges and fully recover the operation as we take care of displaced Crews and Customers as quickly as possible,” the company said.

Alan Kasher, who oversees daily flight operations, told staff in a note on Saturday: “We experienced significant impact in the Florida airports [Friday] evening after an FAA-imposed air traffic management program was implemented due to weather and resulted in a large number of cancellations.”

[…]

Via https://nworeport.me/2021/10/10/report-southwest-airlines-cancels-1000s-of-flights-due-to-air-traffic-control-walkouts-over-vaccine-mandate/

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

A 16-year veteran of the Melbourne, Victoria police force in Australia went public this week to denounce the actions of many police during recent protests.

Acting Senior Sergeant Krystle Mitchell was interviewed by a group called “Discernable,” wearing her full uniform during the interview and announcing that she was officially resigning from the force at the end of her interview.

https://www.discernable.io/watch#

Blaming the police actions ultimately on Victoria Premier Daniel Andrews, Mitchell stated:

“I think that the reason, or the issue, in why perhaps police [are] feeling more emboldened to act the way they are in relation to these harsher actions is because of the messaging that comes from Dan [Andrews],” who tells the law enforcers what to do “on a daily basis.”

However, she stated that individual police members who use excessive force will be held accountable, and that police do have a responsibility not to use excessive force, something that is allegedly grilled into them at the academy.

She served 6 years at Professional Standards Command – the division responsible for investigating police misconduct, corruption, discrimination and freedom of information, referring investigations to the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC) where appropriate.

She reminds her colleagues that ultimately they will individually be held accountable for their actions, and are still subject to s 462A of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) which forbids the disproportionate use of force.

Acting Senior Sergeant Mitchell cites ethical conflicts as the reason for speaking publicly about conduct of Victoria Police officers, their Chief Commissioner – Shane Patton, their Minister – Lisa Neville MP, and ultimately their Premier – Daniel Andrews MP.

She feels she can no longer remain silent with the division between police and community growing, and totally ignored by the leadership of both the police and government.

She also stated that she has talked to over 300 fellow police officers, and the majority feel the same way that she does.

[…]

Via https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/16-year-veteran-australian-police-sergeant-quits-in-protest-of-andrews-covid-orders-claims-majority-of-cops-agree-with-her/

Philip Giraldi

The UNZ Review

An English friend recently learned about the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) plan to either kidnap or kill journalist Julian Assange and quipped “I’ll bet he’s happy to be safe and sound in Belmarsh Prison if he has a chance to read about that!” I replied that his time in Belmarsh has been made as demeaning as possible by an English judge and the British are just as capable of executing a Jeffrey Epstein suicide or “accident” if called upon to do so by their American “cousins.” He agreed, reluctantly. Indeed, the roles of American allies Britain and Australia in what is turning out to be one of the world’s longest-playing judicial dramas has been reprehensible.

For those readers who have missed some of the fun of the Assange saga, a recap is in order. Julian Assange, an Australian citizen who was living in London, was the Editor in Chief and driving force behind Wikileaks, which debuted in 2006 and was one of the alternative news sites that have sprung up over the past twenty years. WikiLeaks was somewhat unique in that it often did not write up its own stories but rather was passed documentary material by sources in government and elsewhere that it then reprinted without any editing.

Assange attracted the ire of the ruling class when he obtained in 2010 a classified video from an unidentified source that showed an unprovoked 2007 shooting incident involving U.S. Army helicopters in Baghdad in which a dozen completely innocent people were killed. The government’s anger at WikiLeaks intensified when, in 2013, Edward Snowden, a National Security Agency contractor, fled to Hong Kong with classified material that demonstrated that the U.S. government was illegally spying on Americans. WikiLeaks also reportedly helped to arrange Snowden’s subsequent escape to Russia from Hong Kong.

The bipartisan animus directed against WikiLeaks intensified still further in the summer of 2016 when the group’s website began to release emails from the Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton’s campaign. The immediate conclusion propagated by Team Hillary but unsupported by facts was that Russian intelligence had hacked the emails and given them to WikiLeaks.

It was perhaps inevitable that Assange’s reporting, which has never been found to be factually inaccurate, was in some circles claimed to be based on information provided to him by Russian hackers. Even though he repeatedly denied that that was the case and there are technical reasons why that was unlikely or even impossible, this led to a sharp Russophobic response from a number of intelligence and law enforcement services close to the United States. Assange was charged in Britain in November 2010 on an international warrant demanding that he be extradited to Sweden over claims that he had committed rape in that country, an accusation which later turned out to be false. He posted bail but lost a legal battle to annul the warrant and then skipped a preliminary hearing in London in June 2012 to accept asylum in the Ecuadorean Embassy, which has diplomatic immunity. He stayed in the Embassy for eighty-two months, at which point a new government in Quito made clear that his asylum would be revoked and he would be expelled from the building. He was preparing to leave voluntarily in April 2019 when police arrived and he was arrested on a charge of his failure to appear in court seven years before which was regarded as “bail jumping.” He was sent immediately to Belmarsh high security prison, where Britain’s terrorist prisoners are confined.

After his arrest, Assange continued to be incarcerated due to a U.S. Justice Department extradition request based on the Espionage Act of 1918, apparently derived from possible interaction with the Chelsea Manning whistleblower case. Assange has now been in Belmarsh for 29 months in spite of increasing international pressure asserting that he is a journalist and should be released. The British have hesitated to extradite him on the basis of the evidence produced by the U.S. government, which included the claim that Assange aided the former U.S. Army analyst Manning break into a classified computer network in order to obtain and eventually publish classified material, but they have likewise failed to release him. The British judge denied extradition in January, suggesting that if he were to be returned forcibly to the U.S. he would likely commit suicide, but she also denied Assange bail as he was considered to be a flight risk. The U.S. appealed that verdict and the next hearing is scheduled for the end of October. It should be noted that no evidence produced by the Justice Department has plausibly linked Assange to the Russian intelligence services.

Which brings us to the Yahoo news revelation regarding the CIA plot to shoot, poison or kidnap Assange while he was sheltering in the Ecuadorian Embassy. It goes something like this: in 2017, Assange’s fifth year in the Embassy, the CIA debated going after him to end the alleged threat posed to government secrets by him and his organization, which was still operating and presumed to be in contact with him. WikiLeaks had at that time been publishing extremely sensitive CIA hacking tools, referred to as “Vault 7,” which constituted “the largest data loss in CIA history.”

Via https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/silencing-julian-assange-why-bother-with-a-trial-when-you-can-just-kill-him/

By Drew Allen

American Thinker

Shortly after the ‘War Against COVID’ began, the government designated two new categories of American citizens — the largely arbitrary classification of ‘essential’ and ‘nonessential’ workers. Firefighters and paramedics were deemed essential, for good reasons.

But now, like their colleagues on the frontline in the medical profession, these brave men and women — once heralded as heroes — are now scorned as villains.

In the state of California, they have gone from heroes to zeroes in the eyes of despotic Democrats, who have given them an ultimatum: get vaccinated or get fired.

In August the Los Angeles City Council voted 13-0 to approve a law requiring all city employees to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19. Since then, a group of more than 600 L.A. City firefighters have banded together to sue the city of Los Angeles to prevent the mandate from being enforced.

While the results of that lawsuit are yet to be determined, come October 20th, those firefighters who have not been fully vaccinated will be terminated. At present, that means approximately 1,600 — nearly 50 percent — of the approximately 3,200 LAFD personnel will be unemployed.

I interviewed three L.A. City Firefighters, who are willing to sacrifice their careers and livelihoods to defend their constitutional and moral right to choose. These men aren’t mere statistical casualties in this un-American and asinine war against the American citizen. They have names, families to support, and mortgages to pay.

Two of the firefighters I interviewed, Jeff and Rob, are both married and in their 30s. Combined, they have nearly three decades of experience as paramedics in L.A. City. Jeff has two children and rents his home. His wife is a stay-at-home mom. He is the sole financial provider.

Rob’s wife is a nurse. They own a home, have a mortgage, and want to start a family. But come October 20th, the livelihoods and careers of both Jeff and Rob will likely be destroyed — because they choose not to get vaccinated.

The mandates are purportedly “for the immediate protection of the public peace, health, and safety.” But CDC director Rochelle Walensky recently admitted that vaccines can’t prevent transmission. This admission negates the entire argument for these mandates.

Jeff also pointed out that “most of us have gotten COVID, given it to our friends and family. We have natural immunity.”

[…]

Via https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/10/la_city_firefighters_from_heroes_to_zeroes.html