The Most Revolutionary Act

Uncensored updates on world events, economics, the environment and medicine

The Most Revolutionary Act
Unknown's avatar

About stuartbramhall

Retired child and adolescent psychiatrist and American expatriate in New Zealand. In 2002, I made the difficult decision to close my 25-year Seattle practice after 15 years of covert FBI harassment. I describe the unrelenting phone harassment, illegal break-ins and six attempts on my life in my 2010 book The Most Revolutionary Act: Memoir of an American Refugee.

The Downside of Technological Innovation

The Utility and Dangers of Dams

Episode 34: Civilization, the Biosphere and Tomorrow

The Big History of Civilizations (2016)

Dr Craig G Benjamin

Film Review

Another really disappointing lecture. For some reason Benjamin is unrealistically enamored of modern technological achievements, which he is convinced only capitalism can deliver. For my part, I agree with Canadian author Ronald White, who, in A Short History of Progress (2004), brands technological innovation as a “progress trap.” In White’s view, all human inventions turn out to have extremely negative “unintended” consequences. White gives the example of weapons as the first progress trap. The second was agriculture, leading widespread deforestation and soil erosion* in all ancient civilizations, accompanied by soil salinization from over-irrigation.

Dams are a third progress trap. Not only do they typically displace tens of thousands of homes and destroy tens of thousands of acres of forests and fertile farmland, but they destroy important ecosystems and migratory fish (eg trout and salmon) that animals and indigenous people depend on them for food.

Benjamin also fails to point out that not all human beings benefit equally from new technology. Most benefits a tiny rich elite at the expense of the rest of us.

Benjamin does mention some of the downsides of rampant technology innovation, but almost as any afterthought: ocean acidification ( due to increasing concentrations of atmospheric CO2), deforestation, species extinction, topsoil loss, loss and contamination of freshwater. He makes no mention of the role of rampant technological development in contaminating the air we breathe, the water we drink and the food we eat. Nevertheless fails to mention how ecosystem damage caused by warehousing of tens of millions of people in megacities,** given their devastation of surrounding countryside and the massive amount of waste they produce. Instead he maintains capitalism always has up and coming technological solutions to all the problems technology creates.

He singles out genetic modification (GMOs) of plants to make them need less water as a potential solution to water shortages. He also has high praise for urban gardens, energy efficient CFL and LED lightsbulbs, improved public transport and cycle ways, as well as high praise for and philanthropists George Soros, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet and Mark Zuckerberg for their work in slowing capitalism’s gradual destruction of the Earth’s life support systems.


*Recent research shows that plowing soil kills it (ie destroys) the delicate network of fungi and bacteria are essential for plant nutrition. See Gaia Raising: The Woodwide Web, Preserving Underground Fungal Networks and Our Ecosystem

**As of 2016, Benjamin gives the following population figures for each of these cities:

Tokyo – 30 million

Delhi – 25 million

Shanghai – 23 million

Mexico City – 21 million

In total 20 cities have over 10 million people.

***On balance, each of these billionaires does far more to destroy than to repair Earth’s life support systems.

Can be viewed free on Kanopy with a library card.

https://pukeariki.kanopy.com/video/civilization-biosphere-and-tomorrow

COVID-positive nurses say they’re being pressured to work while sick, and they’re petrified of infecting patients

A medical worker at UMass Memorial Medical Center ties her PPE around her back while looking down.

Four nurses told Insider their hospitals are pressuring them to come into work shortly after testing positive for COVID-19. JOSEPH PREZIOSO/AFP via Getty Images

By Allana Akhtar and Aria Bendix
Business insider

  • A handful of nurses are using TikTok to call out hospitals pressuring them to come to work with COVID-19.
  • Four nurses across the US told Insider they had been told to come into work while sick or risk losing pay.
  • Some nurses said they’re close to quitting after nearly two years of long hours and heightened verbal and physical abuse.

What was once an ill-advised practice is now becoming a common request across US hospitals: Healthcare workers are being asked to treat patients while sick with COVID-19.

In a TikTok video now viewed more than 7.2 million times, April Lynn, an ICU nurse, claimed her hospital cleared her to return to work five days after testing positive for COVID-19, despite still having a cough and severe fatigue. (Lynn did not respond to Insider’s request for comment.)

Four other nurses told Insider that, in the last week or so, they’ve been instructed to come into work with symptomatic COVID-19, or risk losing pay or receiving a formal warning. The nurses said hospital administrators are pointing to new federal emergency guidance that allows healthcare workers to shorten isolation periods as a way to mitigate widespread staffing shortages.

“After almost two years of having to deal with this and having such a high stress job, this is kind of like a kick in the face,” labor and delivery nurse Rachel Pokriva, who tested positive for COVID-19 on Monday, told Insider. Pokriva is due to return to work on Thursday at St. Joseph East in Lexington, Kentucky, despite still suffering intense nausea and fatigue.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s emergency guidance, released on December 23, healthcare workers can return to work five to seven days after testing positive for COVID-19. Isolation time can also be cut shorter than seven days with a negative test “if there are staffing shortages,” the CDC stated.

[…]

300+ Members of Boston College Community Demand COVID Booster Mandate Policy Recognize Natural Immunity

By  Hooman Noorchashm, M.D., Ph.D.

More than 300 Boston College parents, students, alumni, faculty and staff this week signed a petition to the college’s president, Fr. William Leahy, opposing the college’s recently instituted one-size-fits-all COVID-19 booster mandate because it fails to recognize natural immunity.

A group of more than 300 Boston College parents, students, alumni, faculty and staff this week signed a petition to the college’s president, Fr. William Leahy, opposing the administration’s recently instituted one-size-fits-all COVID-19 booster mandate.

The petition requests the college create rational “off ramps” to the policy to protect individuals with “hybrid immunity” and those with serologically verifiable evidence of robust COVID-19 antibody immunity.

This is the first community uprising at one of America’s elite universities against unsafe and unnecessary booster mandates

This new mandate was issued even though more than 97% of that campus is already fully vaccinated by mandate — and despite the fact that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has not changed the definition of “fully vaccinated” to include a booster shot.

The biggest problem with this irrational and unsafe booster mandate is that it does not take into consideration the fact that many already vaccinated students, faculty and staff at BC also had a natural infection.

These individuals carry what Dr. Anthony Fauci himself labeled robust “hybrid immunity.” Many in the public health arena and in the Biden administration have described this type of immunity as being “bulletproof.”

Still, Boston College’s University Health Services, and administration led by sports medicine physician, Dr. Douglas Comaeu, are rigidly mandating these individuals undergo a mandated booster shot.

With the Omicron variant raging through the nation since Thanksgiving, many members of the college community and elsewhere were recently infected, despite being already “fully vaccinated.”

These persons are also being subjected to BC’s draconian booster mandate even though they, too, now have hybrid immunity.

But perhaps most concerning is that BC is electing to continue its dangerous booster vaccine policy despite severe warnings.

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/boston-college-covid-booster-mandate-policy-natural-immunity/

FAA Warned by Doctors in Letter Describing Vaccine Hazard, Health, FAA Violations


Suzanne Downing

Global Research, January 06, 2022
Must Read Alaska 30 December 202

A group of doctors and others have penned a letter to the Federal Aviation Administration, explaining a problem that they’ve identified with the Covid-19 vaccine: Pilots are flying with unapproved medications in their bodies, in violation of FAA rules.

According to the letter signers, which include attorneys and medical doctors, the airline industry is operating in violation of Title 14 of the Federal Aviation Regulations, and related federal rules, which prohibit pilots from flying with non-FDA approved agents in their bodies, such as the Covid-10 vaccines, if those substances put the general public at risk for serious injury or death. The writers distinguish between FDA-approved vaccines and those that are actually being used to reduce the danger of Covid-19.

The authors of the letter are requesting the FAA medically flag all vaccinated pilots within four weeks of the Dec. 15 letter, until those pilots undergo thorough medical reexaminations to include D-Dimer tests; which check for blood clotting; Troponin tests, which reveal heart muscle damage; and EKG and MRI tests to determine cardiac health.

The signers of the letter are recommending that all pilots who fail the tests be immediately grounded until they can get a clean bill of health.

“From this point forward, only allowing commercial aircraft to be operated by pilots who can show D-Dimer and Troponin tests – as well as cardiac MRIs, ECGs and PULS tests – at aeromedically acceptable levels, and a clean medical examination undertaken a minimum of five (5) days after each COVID-19 vaccine and after each COVID ‘booster’ shot, as a review of reporting systems such as the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (‘VAERS’) indicates that the current FAA wait time of two (2) days is insufficient to detect a significant number of blood clotting and myocarditis cases (which are manifesting more than 48 hours post-inoculation),” the group wrote.

“…the FDA has not approved any of the COVID-19 shots currently available in the United States. On August 23, the FDA granted BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH’s Biologics Licensing Application to distribute the Comirnaty vaccine in the United States once certain conditions are met; however, the Comirnaty vaccine is not currently available in the United States – and will not be until the supply of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is first exhausted. See https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download. The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is currently available only under an EUA, which the FDA extended on August 23, 2021. See https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download. It is also important to note that the approved vaccine, Comirnaty, cannot be said to be interchangeable with unapproved inoculations,” the letter said.

The group said it knows of pilots who have died after getting the Covid vaccine, and others who continue to suffer side effects but are afraid to report them for fear of being grounded.

Some pilots have been forced to seek medical care, such as Cody Flint, whose story is included in the letter:

“I am a 33 year old husband and father of two young boys. I am an agricultural pilot by profession, with over 10,000 flight hours. I have been very healthy my whole life, with no underlying conditions. I received my first dose of the Pfizer Covid Vaccine on February 1. Within thirty minutes, I developed a severe stabbing headache, which later became a burning sensation in the back of my neck. Two days after vaccination, I got in my airplane to do a job that would only take a few hours.

“Immediately after taking off, I knew that something was not right with me. I was starting to develop tunnel vision, and my headache was getting worse. Approximately two hours into flying, I pulled my airplane up to turn around and felt an extreme burst of pressure in my ears.

“Instantly, I was nearly blacked out, dizzy, disoriented, nauseous and shaking uncontrollably. By the grace of God, I was able to land my plane without incident – although I do not remember doing this.

“My initial diagnosis of vertigo and severe panic attacks – although I’ve never had a history of either of these – was later replaced with left and right peri-lymphatic fistulas, Eustachian tube dysfunction, and elevated intra-cranial pressure due to brain swelling. My condition continued to decline, and my doctors told me that only an adverse reaction to the vaccine or a major head trauma could have caused this much spontaneous damage.

“I’ve had six spinal taps over eight months to monitor my intra-cranial pressure, and two surgeries, eight weeks apart, to repair the fistulas. I have missed nearly an entire year of my life – and my children’s lives. Days of baseball games, playing in the backyard, and just picking up my kids to hug them have been replaced with living in a sick body, doctor’s visits, and more questions than answers. I don’t know if I’ll ever be able to fly again.

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/faa-warned-doctors-letter-describing-vaccine-hazard-health-faa-violations/5766436

The Incidence of Cancer Triggered by the Covid 19 “Vaccine”

Coincidence? The Key Word 

Several months ago, we expressed at least “theoretical reservations” about vaccinating cancer patients or former patients who had been cured, because of the underlying mechanism of the gene injection on immunity.

Several geneticists had also expressed their concerns about the possible interference between active or dormant cancer cells and the activity of gene therapy on lymphocytes in particular.

Months have passed, and the vaccine madness has amplified, leading to the refusal of patients without a passport in hospitals (which, as is well known, are intended to receive only healthy people) and to the demand that patients be vaccinated  before receiving any treatment, including cancer patients.

[…]

More and More Testimonies are Coming In 

Whatever their unacceptable reasons, testimonies are multiplying.

A young girl accompanies her friend to her mother’s funeral… such a mother, mother of a high school friend, 34 years old, in remission from breast cancer for two years, who is injected with the vaccine and collapses a few days later in a coma and dies after three days of hospitalization… Politically correct explanation: the cancer exploded and took her away. Close the chapter and the coffin.

[…]

In any case, as far as “cancer and gene injection” is concerned, the vagueness unfortunately dissipates in front of the multitude of terrible stories.

From the colleague who sees multiple “balls” appearing under her armpits, which the check-ups in the hospital do not explain… Obviously no possible link with the vax. And yet the ganglions that appear some time after the injection are a frequent observation after these vax.

So clearly there seems to be three situations:

  • The appearance of a cancer rapidly after the injection (two weeks to a few months) and very progressive, in a person who was previously free of known carcinological pathologies.
  • The resumption of cancer in a patient who has been in complete remission for several months or years.
  • The rapid, even explosive, evolution of a cancer that is not yet controlled.

Beyond the testimonies that are pouring in from relatives and friends and on social networks, a Swiss newspaper has finally addressed the subject in a broader way.

Here are some excerpts from their article[6] and their references[7]:

“Can covid vaccines cause cancer?

In some cases, the answer seems to be yes. Certainly, there is no evidence that the covid vaccines themselves are carcinogenic. However, it has been shown that in up to 50% of vaccinees, covid vaccines can induce temporary immunosuppression or immune dysregulation (lymphocytopenia) that can last for about a week or possibly longer.

Furthermore, covid mRNA vaccines have been shown to “reprogram” (i.e., influence) adaptive and innate immune responses and, in particular, to downregulate the so-called TLR4 pathway, which is known to play an important role in the immune response to infections and cancer cells.”

Thus the authors conclude that it is quite possible that these immune changes could have unintended consequences on the condition of the recipient of the gene injection. A matter of common sense indeed!

“Thus, if there is already a tumor somewhere – known or unknown – or if there is a predisposition to a certain type of cancer, such a state of vaccine-induced immune suppression or immune dysregulation could potentially trigger sudden tumor growth and cancer within weeks of vaccination. It should be noted that lymphocytopenia was also frequently observed in cases of severe covid.

Post-vaccination reactivation of latent viral infections, including shingles virus, EBV (Epstein-Barr) and hepatitis virus, has also been observed.

“Vaccine-induced temporary immunosuppression is also a factor that may contribute to the post-vaccination spike in coronavirus infections seen in many countries.”

Frequency of Vaccine Related Adverse Event in Cancer 

There are already a few thousand observations in official adverse event reporting and online patient groups. There are certainly true coincidences or diagnostic delays due to delayed diagnosis related to containment. But we should not dismiss the huge problems that these real people affected in their daily lives and even more the responsibility that cancer doctors take by imposing the injection before any treatment or protocol continuation. Their main argument: “we did it right, without discussion” does not seem worthy of a once thoughtful profession.

In August 2021, Dr. Ryan Cole,[8] an American pathologist for many years, described a significant increase in certain types of cancer (e.g. endometrial cancer, uterine cancer) since the beginning of the covid mass vaccination campaign. More recently, German pathologists have also noted the problem of post-vaccination immune dysregulation and sudden tumor growth in some patients.

On the French networks, several testimonies coincide with the reappearance of vaginal hemorrhages in women over 85 years of age leading to the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and rapid death… The spike protein produced by the body following the injection is particularly attracted to the genitals, and this would be a new demonstration of this.

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-incidence-of-cancer-triggered-by-the-covid-19-vaccine/5758110

Capitol Riot One-Year Anniversary: Was it a False-Flag Attack?

How the Attack on the Capitol Happened, From Planning to Siege to Arrests |  GQ
Scene from January 6, 2021, Capitol riots. [Source: gq.com]

Jeremy Kuzmarov

Covert Action Magazine

Amateurish planning, delayed police response and presence of agent provocateurs in crowd offers indication that Deep State was behind it.

On January 6, 2021—one year ago today—a mob of pro-Trump supporters laid siege to the U.S. Capitol, causing more than $30 million in property damage and as many as seven deaths.

At that time, a Joint Session of Congress was convening to perform its constitutional obligation to count the electoral votes for President and Vice President and officially announce the results of the 2020 election, which the rioters viewed as illegitimate.

Upon entering the building, they disrupted the Joint Session of Congress, vandalized, and stole property, ransacked offices, and threatened the lives of elected leaders such as Vice President Mike Pence, who sanctioned the election result, and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, who had been branded as “the devil.”

Since those events, 719 people have been charged with crimes, and 129 rioters have entered guilty pleas.[1]

In November, Fox News host Tucker Carlson caused a stir when he hosted a documentary series, “Patriot Purge” that branded the Capitol riots as a “false-flag” terrorist attack.

According to Carlson, the riots were provoked by violent left-wing antifa activists, the FBI and other intelligence agencies in an effort to discredit the pro-Trump movement and political right.

Carlson was derided by mainstream news outlets as a “conspiracy theorist” and compared to maligned figures such as Alex Jones, who hosts a show that aims to expose the nefarious machinations of the “deep state.”[2]

But there is some substance to what Carlson is alleging—particularly with regards to the FBI and other intelligence agencies—though not with regards to Black Lives Matter and antifa.

Agent Provocateurs in the Crowd

“Patriot Purge” presents the view that the pro-Trump mob that stormed the Capitol included numerous agent provocateurs.

Witnesses indeed reported that they saw groups of men wearing camouflage uniforms and black gear who resembled provocateurs.

The New York Times reported in September that there were at least two FBI informants in the Capitol riot crowd. A study by Revolver News, a pro-Trump news site, found unindicted conspirators to be among the most aggressive.

Thomas Caldwell, leader of the far-right Oath Keepers group, which was accused of being one of the chief organizers of the riot, was a former Naval Reserve intelligence officer and FBI agent. One of the unindicted co-conspirators was his wife.

Enrique Tarrio, the leader of the Proud Boys, another chief organizer of the riot, was an FBI informant.

The very first breach of the Capitol’s police barricades at 12:50 p.m. was coordinated by a former Marine Sergeant from Arizona, Ray Epps, who was removed from the FBI’s Capital Violence Most Wanted List in July—one day after Revolver exposed the FBI’s protection of known Epps associate and Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes.[3]

Rhodes had organized and activated a plan to use violence on 1/6 through a series of encrypted Signal messages beginning at 1:38 p.m.—as Trump concluded his speech at the National Mall and an hour before Oath Keepers lieutenants rushed the Capitol doors.

The FBI has been unable to identify one of Epps’s co-conspirators—despite having a full-frontal photo of him.

Unidentified man who collaborated with Epps to instigate the 1/6 riots. With this full photo, he should be easily identifiable. [Source: revolver.news]

Another suspicious figure is John Sullivan, who filmed Ashli Babbitt being shot. He was exposed as an FBI provocateur who had infiltrated antifa and Black Lives Matters in order to cast them in a bad light and put them in jail.

A Poorly Planned Inside Job?

“Patriot Purge” includes an interview with Emily Rainey, a former army psychological officer who said that, if the “capitol riots was an insurrection, it was the most poorly planned ever.”

This would give credence to the theory that the riots were stage-managed, with an ulterior purpose. Rep. Steven Horsford (D-Nev.) expressed belief that the riots were “an inside job.”

Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-Calif.) raised the question of possible collusion among some Capitol Police officers who pulled down barricades for the rioters and, in another instance, stopped for a photo with one of them.

House Financial Services Committee Chair Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) told a radio station that Democrats did not yet know if the failures by Capitol Police were the result of “poor planning or whether it was because there was certain kinds of infiltration”—which is precisely what Carlson has suggested.

[…]

Via https://covertactionmagazine.com/2022/01/06/capitol-riot-one-year-anniversary-was-it-a-false-flag-attack/

Chemical Giant BASF Puts 1.5 Million Americans at Risk of Cancer

By  Max Blau, ProPublica Lylla Younes, ProPublica

BASF, producer of ingredients for America’s most popular soaps, surface cleaners and dishwasher detergents, operates two dozen plants in the U.S. Emissions from those plants expose an estimated 1.5 million Americans to elevated cancer risks, a ProPublica analysis found.

Today, the area is home to a one-room post office, two churches, and a shooting range open three days a week. For years in the 1990s, Walker worked behind the counter at the post office.

There used to be a bar called the White Stone Mall on the same stretch of highway, where Walker would sip beers, shoot pool and chat with workers getting off their shifts from a chemical plant across the street.

She didn’t know much about the German-owned company, BASF, that operated the plant. After BASF expanded its site in the 2000s, demolishing the bar in the process, she had little reason to stop along that highway, except when the railroad gates halted traffic.

The passing trains carried tank cars of chemicals bound for White Stone’s BASF plant, a fleeting moment in an epic multi-state journey during which BASF transforms natural gas into specialized, secretive compounds that are the building blocks of ubiquitous cleaning products.

BASF isn’t a household name like Procter & Gamble, but the ingredients it creates are essential to the success of that company’s products, allowing dirt stains to be lifted from clothes and egg yolk to be washed off plates.

The long, winding path from shale rock to the kitchen cabinet contributes to massive sales for BASF, the world’s largest chemical maker. But for the company’s neighbors, the journey leaves behind a trail of toxic pollution that has placed hundreds of thousands of people — including Walker — in harm’s way.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency aspires to minimize the number of people exposed to emissions that increase excess cancer risk above 1 in 1 million. That risk level means that if 1 million people in an area were exposed to toxic air pollutants over a presumed lifetime of 70 years, there would likely be at least one case of cancer on top of those from risks people already face.

But a ProPublica analysis found that the EPA effectively allows two dozen BASF plants nationwide to expose an estimated 1.5 million Americans to elevated cancer risks greater than 1 in 1 million.

EPA rules also say that plants should never expose people to an additional lifetime cancer risk that exceeds 1 in 10,000. Yet an estimated 2,800 people who live near BASF plants around the country face risks at least that high because of the company’s emissions, according to our analysis.

Our analysis is based on an EPA screening tool that uses data reported by companies such as BASF. It cannot be used to assess the cause of individual cancer cases, but can identify geographic areas of potential concern.

BASF’s footprint of cancer-causing air pollution is larger than that of any other foreign-owned company in the U.S. and is the fourth-largest toxic footprint among all companies operating in this country, according to our analysis.

[…]

Dirty Secret: Chemical Giant BASF Puts 1.5 Million Americans at Risk of Cancer

Omicron Spares U.S. ICUs So Far, Mirroring South Africa

FDA admits that covid-19 antigen tests DO NOT detect ...

Bloomberg

U.S. hospitals are so far seeing significantly fewer severe outcomes from the Omicron wave than they saw in past COVID-19 spikes, mirroring the experience of South Africa and the U.K. Even New York, the uber-dense site of one of the nation’s worst outbreaks, is seeing similar results.

In the U.K., the general pattern of lower hospitalization has held up so far even as cases surged, as the Financial Times’ John Burn-Murdoch showed Tuesday.

[…]

Via https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-01-04/omicron-spares-u-s-icus-so-far-mirroring-s-africa-trajectory

Pentagon Fails Audit (yet Again!) – $35 TRILLION still MISSING

Pentagon “loses” 50 cents of every dollar allocated by congress.

thefreeonline's avatarThe Free

December 31, 2021 by Dave Lindorff

The Pentagon’s $35 Trillion Accounting Black Hole

The Pentagon failed its audit amid a now $35 trillion scandal (yes, trillion) – Lee Camp

That’s what should have been the biggest news of 2021.

Instead, the story, which broke on November 17, was largely ignored or buried.

The nation’s two main newspapers, the Washington Post and the New York Times, have simply ignored it.

Cold War is good for business: US contractors rejoice at the new Red Scare

Other news organizations stenographically quoted Pentagon officials as admitting that they “failed again” but saw “progress,” and as promising that they would achieve a “clean” audit by… get this … 2027.

guih

The Pentagon, with some $3 trillion (give or take a trillion but who’s counting?) in assets and a record current 2021 budget of $738 billion, has for the third year in a row failed its audit.

View original post 3,254 more words

With Clinton Brand Discredited, Its High Time to Reopen Investigation into Death of Vince Foster

By Jeremy Kuzmarov

Covert Action Magazine

Vince Foster was the highest federal official to die since JFK. His death was ruled a suicide; however, strong evidence suggests that he was murdered.

Shortly after 6 p.m. on July 20, 1993, following two 911 calls, the U.S. Park Police came upon the body of Vincent W. Foster, White House Counsel, and Bill and Hillary Clinton’s personal lawyer, who had come to Washington, D.C., after working closely with Hillary at the Rose Law Firm in Little Rock, Arkansas.

Foster’s body was found lying face up, head up on the side of a steep slope in Fort Marcy Park, an old Civil War structure in McLean Virginia—located only 8 minutes away from CIA headquarters—on a dirt path in front of an old cannon. With his head blood-stained, Foster was still clutching the .38 colt revolver he supposedly shot himself with, his thumb trapped by the trigger.

On the day of his death, Foster had left his office in the White House’s West Wing at 1 p.m. after eating lunch there. Supposedly, he jumped in his Honda, walked to a secluded corner of the park and killed himself.

Strangely, no one had seen Foster from the moment he had left the West Wing to the time his body was discovered—even though his face had been splashed across the news.[1]

Also, no one heard the thunderous noise of a gunshot and police investigators initially did not find his car keys on him, raising questions about how he got to the park.

In the Foster case also, they would have expected a huge pool of blood—a mess—when only a small trickle of blood was found running from his mouth.[3]

The gun itself appeared clean—as if it had been wiped.[4]

Further Evidence that the Crime Scene Was Staged

There were several other suspicious things about Foster’s death to contradict the official story. These included:

  1. No soil found on Foster’s shoes despite him allegedly having walked down a dirt path. Everyone who walked down the path had soil samples on their shoes.[5]
  2. The bullet that killed Foster could not be located.[6]
  3. None of the 26 people who viewed Foster’s body before the autopsy saw entrance and exit wounds from the bullet that allegedly killed him.[7]
  4. No fingerprints on the gun and no gunpowder was found on Foster’s tongue. There was also no disfigurement of the mouth or chipped teeth as is usual for a gun shot through the mouth.[8]
  5. Foster’s family could not identify the .38 colt revolver as being his.
  6. Foster’s eyeglasses were found some 19 feet from his head, or 13 feet beyond his shoes, indicating the staging of the scene.[9]
  7. A gash on Foster’s neck and wine stain on his shirt has never been explained along with the presence of semen in his underpants.[10]
  8. The first witness and police officer on the scene reported that they did not find a gun in Foster’s hand, indicating that a gun may have placed next to him afterwards.

[…]

As the Clintons’ personal lawyer, Foster knew more than any living person about the Clintons’ finances and sub rosa campaign financing, tax evasion practices, shady associations,[43] and the Whitewater land deal—the focus of a prolonged legal investigation led by Kenneth Starr.

[…]

Via https://covertactionmagazine.com/2022/01/05/with-the-clinton-brand-now-discredited-its-high-time-to-reopen-the-investigation-into-the-death-of-vince-foster/