The Most Revolutionary Act

Uncensored updates on world events, economics, the environment and medicine

The Most Revolutionary Act
Unknown's avatar

About stuartbramhall

Retired child and adolescent psychiatrist and American expatriate in New Zealand. In 2002, I made the difficult decision to close my 25-year Seattle practice after 15 years of covert FBI harassment. I describe the unrelenting phone harassment, illegal break-ins and six attempts on my life in my 2010 book The Most Revolutionary Act: Memoir of an American Refugee.

Senate Blocks Resolution Calling for Removal of US Forces From Syria

 U.S. Army, soldiers surveil the area during a combined joint patrol in Manbij, Syria (File) - Sputnik International, 1920, 07.12.2023

Sputnik

The US Senate on Thursday blocked a joint resolution introduced by Kentucky Republican Senator Rand Paul directing the Biden administration to remove US military forces from Syria within 30 days.

“The American people have had enough of endless wars in the Middle East. Yet, 900 US troops remain in Syria with no vital US interest at stake, no definition of victory, no exit strategy, and no congressional authorization to be there,” Paul said in a statement on the resolution.

The resolution would direct the president to remove US troops from hostilities “in or affecting Syria” within 30 days of adoption, unless a declaration of war or other authorization for use of force was enacted by Congress.

Thursday’s resolution was the second time this year that anti-interventionist, pro-‘America First’ Republicans in Congress have attempted to force the Biden administration to pull US troops out of Syria. In March, the House of Representatives voted down a resolution put forward by Florida Republican Congressman Matt Gaetz to remove American forces from the Middle Eastern country, with the lawmaker and his fellow pro-Trump Freedom Caucus Republicans getting a rare show of support from the Democrats’ Congressional Progressive Caucus, resulting in more than 100 lawmakers voting in favor of the bill (the measure ended up failing by a vote of 103 to 321).

US forces have occupied the oil and food-rich northeastern third of Syria since 2017, and have engaged in the smuggling of billions of dollars worth of Syrian oil out of the country to enforce a strategy by Washington to try to economically suffocate the government of President Bashar Assad into submission.

During his presidency, President Trump casually admitted on multiple occasions to the legacy media’s horror that US forces in Syria were in the country “only for the oil.” The Biden administration has insisted American troops are in the country only to prevent the resurgence of Daesh (ISIS), the Islamist extremist terrorist group vanquished from the region in 2017.

[…]

Via https://sputnikglobe.com/20231207/senate-blocks-resolution-calling-for-removal-of-us-forces-from-syria-1115461232.html

Mammograms linked to 84% higher breast cancer death rate

EARLY DETECTION, EARLY DEATH: Mammograms linked to 84% higher breast cancer death rate

Dr Eddy Betterman

New research published in JAMA Oncology reveals that mammography is responsible for an astounding 84 percent higher rate of breast cancer deaths over a 20-year surveillance period.

Because of the very high rate of false positives they produce, mammograms end up killing, it would seem, many more women than would otherwise die from breast cancer had they never participated in the mammography racket.

Mammograms produce trauma in patients, both physically in breast tissue and also psychologically, emotionally and even spiritually in women who end up being told that they must undergo even more invasive “treatments” in order to survive.

The pressure that mammography puts on breast tissue can be a cause of cancer in and of itself, not to mention all the chemotherapy, radiation and surgery that typically ensues. It is a horrifically traumatic experience for women that leaves many of them scarred for life, assuming they even survive.

(Related: Back in 2016, some surgeons published a study showing that mammography is neither safe nor effective, and that women should opt out of participating in the “outdated” practice.)

Cancer is a for-profit industry

Mammography is also dangerous in that the primary modality utilized is x-ray technology, which radiates breast tissue on top of the machine physically pressing it down. The gamma rays alone are a known breast carcinogen that is especially concerning for women with so-called BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene “mutations.”

The official recommendation from the U.S. Preventive Services Guidelines pushes women to start getting screened through mammography every other year starting at age 40.

“These guidelines put millions more healthy women at risk of radiation-induced adverse breast changes, as well as the psychobiological harms addressed in this article,” contends Sayer Ji of GreenMedInfo.

Pretty much across the board, the medical establishment tries to pretend as though mammography is risk-free, ignoring many known risks such as x-ray radiation exposure, false positive diagnoses, overdiagnosis, and of course all the invasive “treatments” that follow.

About a decade ago, it was determined that more than 1.3 million women have had their breast tissue wrongly removed due to a non-cancerous condition called ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), which is now recognized as being benign. For too long, though, DCIS was treated like cancer and many women underwent mastectomies for it for no good reason.

“Overdiagnosis can be distinguished from false positives in that in overdiagnosis screen-detected abnormalities are observed in asymptomatic and ostensibly healthy women which would not cause harm if left undetected, or would cause more net harm to be diagnosed and treated than if left undiscovered or left to progress untreated (so-called ‘watchful waiting.’),” Ji further writes.

“False positives, on the other hand, occur when there is a positive screening mammography assessment that leads to more diagnostic work-up but no diagnosis of breast cancer. While false positives are ultimately discovered as such, the damage may already be done, given the power of the subconscious mind and the so-called nocebo effect, which is the opposite of the placebo effect, to do profound emotional and bodily harm to those who think they have a life-threatening diagnosis of cancer but are not actually sick.”

In the United States, roughly 11 percent of women receive a false-positive result from just one single mammography screening. In Europe, that figure is much lower at just 2.5 percent, but still corresponds to a much larger cumulative risk in that after just 10 screenings, roughly 20 percent of women in Europe will receive at least one false-positive result.

[…]

Via https://dreddymd.com/2023/12/08/mammograms-linked-84percent-higher-breast-cancer-deaths/

US Senate Blocks Ukraine Funding

US Senate blocks Ukraine funding

RT

A spending package proposed by the White House, that included over $60 billion in funding for Kiev, failed to pass in the Senate on Wednesday, falling short of the 60 votes necessary to proceed.

The final vote was 49 in favor and 51 against; the Republican opposition voted against the bill alongside Senator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent who normally votes with the Democrats. Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, also voted “no” so he could bring the bill up again at a later date, according to The Hill.

The White House originally requested $105 billion in emergency supplemental “national security” funding in October, choosing to bundle the aid to Ukraine with money for Israel, Taiwan and “border security” in order to appeal to Republicans. The GOP-majority House has insisted on dealing with each issue in a separate appropriations bill – which the Democrat-dominate Senate refused.

Earlier in the day, President Joe Biden urged the Senate to approve the bill, accusing Republicans of wanting to “literally kneecap Ukraine on the battlefield and damage our national security in the process” and holding the funding for Kiev “hostage” to border policy.

“Literally the entire world is watching: what will the US do?” Biden told reporters, suggesting that without American leadership the G7, the EU and Japan might not continue backing Kiev, effectively delivering a victory to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The US has sent over $100 billion in aid to Kiev since the conflict with Russia escalated in February 2022, including weapons, ammunition, supplies, and cash to bolster the Ukrainian currency and pay pensions and government salaries. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said on Tuesday that Ukraine would be defeated without additional funding, and that this would be entirely Washington’s fault.

Speaking ahead of Wednesday evening’s vote, Schumer urged Republicans not to join the “hard right” which he claimed was using the border issue as “nothing more than an excuse” to kill funding for Ukraine. Republicans, however, argued that the Democrats weren’t taking their concerns seriously enough.

“It may take a failed cloture vote for them to realize we’re serious, and we’re prepared to do that,” Senator John Cornyn of Texas said earlier this week. Cloture is a Senate procedure in which a bill requires 60 votes to proceed.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, told the White House on Tuesday that one of the prerequisites for approving aid to Ukraine would be enacting HR2, the Secure the Border Act of 2023, describing the situation on the border with Mexico as “an unconscionable and unsustainable catastrophe.”

More than 6.5 million people have crossed the border illegally since Biden took office, he said, including almost 300 “on the terrorist watchlist.”

Democrats have balked at changing any of the asylum or parole rules, which currently allow anyone crossing the border to claim asylum and be released into the interior of the country, claiming that would be “inhumane.”

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/588636-senate-blocks-ukraine-funding/

Hunter Biden Indicted Thursday on Nine Charges, Including Three Felonies

Hunter Biden

By Victor Nava

New York Post

Hunter Biden was indicted Thursday on nine charges — including three felonies — in part for allegedly dodging more than $1 million in taxes while living a hard-partying, “extravagant” life over a four-year period.

The three felonies leveled against President Biden’s 53-year-old son — who faces a maximum penalty of 17 years in prison if convicted on all counts — include one count tax evasion for his 2018 personal taxes and two counts of filing a false return for his 2018 personal taxes and on a corporate income tax return for his company Owasco, PC.

He has also been hit with six misdemeanor counts of failure to pay and failure to file charges for the 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019 tax years.

“The Defendant engaged in a four-year scheme to not pay at least $1.4 million in self-assessed federal taxes he owed for tax years 2016 through 2019,” special counsel David Weiss wrote in the 56-page indictment out of the Central District of California.

“In furtherance of that scheme,” Weiss noted that Hunter “subverted the payroll and tax withholding process of his own company, Owasco, PC by withdrawing millions from Owasco, PC” and “spent millions of dollars on an extravagant lifestyle rather than paying his tax bills.”

Biden spent his cash on “drugs, escorts and girlfriends, luxury hotels and rental properties, exotic cars, clothing, and other items of a personal nature, in short, everything but his taxes,” according to the indictment.

Weiss highlighted that Biden used a business line of credit to make more than $27,000 in payments to a porn site, “which in total accounted for one fifth of all of the business line of credit expenditures.”

The porn payments were among nearly $189,000 the first son spent on “adult entertainment” while not paying taxes, according to Weiss, including a $10,000 payment for a sex club membership that he expensed as a “golf club membership.”

He also claimed a false deduction for “consulting” that was “in truth and in fact” payments to “various women who were either romantically involved with or otherwise performing personal services” for Biden.

More than $680,000 went to these women while Biden wasn’t paying Uncle Sam.

“When he did finally file his 2018 returns, [Hunter] included false business deductions in order to evade assessment of taxes to reduce the substantial tax liabilities he faced as of February 2020,” the special counsel added.

Judge Mark Scarsi, an appointee of former President Donald Trump, has been assigned the new case.

The scandal-scarred first son is already facing three felony counts related to false statements he made when purchasing a firearm. Weiss brought those charges against him in September, after a June plea deal fell apart in a Delaware courtroom.

Biden has pleaded not guilty to all charges. He faces a maximum of 25 years in prison in the gun case.

Weiss convened the Los Angeles grand jury that brought Thursday’s indictment against Hunter last month, according to CNN. The special counsel also issued a subpoena to first brother James Biden as part of his five-year investigation into Hunter.

In the failed deal, Hunter Biden agreed to plead guilty to two misdemeanor charges of failing to pay at least $100,000 on more than $1.5 million in earned income in both 2017 and 2018.

At the time, Weiss declined to bring charges against Biden for alleged tax crimes committed in Southern California and Washington, DC, after US attorneys in both districts refused to partner in his investigation.

IRS whistleblower Gary Shapley claims Biden avoided paying taxes on $8.3 million in income he received between 2014 and 2019, a period during which he sat on the board of the Ukrainian gas company Burisma Holdings and the Chinese private equity fund BHR Partners.

During the plea hearing, prosecutors noted to US District Judge Maryellen Noreika that the agreement did not preclude bringing charges against Biden later for other alleged crimes — such as possible violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act.

The alleged FARA violations stem from Biden failing to register as a foreign agent while engaged in lucrative dealings in countries such as China and Ukraine that allegedly involved his father and uncle.

The FBI, tasked with investigating aspects of Weiss’ probe related to money laundering and FARA violations, didn’t anticipate charges being brought against Hunter related to those matters, according to CNN.

Federal investigators also raised the possibility of charging Biden for crimes related to sex trafficking over his communications with numerous alleged prostitutes in which he appeared to be coordinating their travel across state lines – a possible violation of the federal Mann Act’s prohibition on interstate prostitution – according to IRS whistleblower documents.

The new criminal case against Biden comes as House Republicans prepare to formally authorize the impeachment inquiry into President Biden for alleged corruption.

The resolution, introduced by Rep. Kelly Armstrong (R-ND) on Wednesday, directs the House Judiciary, Oversight and Ways and Means committees to determine “whether sufficient grounds exist” to impeach the president for his alleged role in Hunter and James Biden’s foreign business ventures during his vice presidency.

Two sources told The Post that the House tentatively plans to vote Wednesday on the legislation.

The Post has reached out to Hunter Biden’s lawyers for comment on the new charges.

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer lauded the IRS whistleblowers, Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, after the new indictment dropped, arguing that the charges wouldn’t have been filed if the agents had not come forward with allegations of a Justice Department cover-up in the probe.

“The Department of Justice got caught in its attempt to give Hunter Biden an unprecedented sweetheart plea deal and today’s charges filed against Hunter Biden are the result of Mr. Shapley and Mr. Ziegler’s efforts to ensure all Americans are treated equally under the law,” Comer said in a statement. “Every American should applaud these men for their courage to expose the truth.

“Hunter Biden’s corporate entities implicated by today’s indictments funneled foreign cash that landed in Joe Biden’s bank account. Unless US Attorney Weiss investigates everyone involved in the Bidens’ fraud schemes and influence peddling, it will be clear President Biden’s DOJ is protecting Hunter Biden and the big guy,” the Kentucky Republican added.

[…]

Via https://nypost.com/2023/12/07/news/new-criminal-case-filed-against-hunter-biden-report/

Etruscan Mythology (According to the Roman Emperor Claudius)

The Etruscan prophet Lasa Vecuva

Episode 12 Etruscan Myths, Legends and Heroes

The Mysterious Etruscans

Dr Steven L Tuck (2016)

Film Review

The Etruscans had a deep knowledge of Greek mythology and adopted much of it as their own. They also worshiped uniquely Etruscan gods and heroes according to a 20- volume history the Roman emperor Claudius* wrote in 41-54 AD. Among the most important were

Athrapa – invisible spirit of fate, who carries a hammer and nail. She hammers a nail into the wall to signify the passage of a year and appears suddenly appear alongside murder victims to reveal their cause of death.

Tages – the infant Tarkan dug up with his plow who taught Etruscans their religious and divination rituals (see How the Etruscans Gave Us Our Calendar and Grid System of City Planning).

Lasa Vecuva – female prophet who informed the Etruscans of Zeus’s order for all their land to surveyed and delineated to protect against greed. She warned their crops would fail if people unlawfully seized others’ land.

Caelius and Aulus Vibenna – Etruscan heroes who fought with Rome’s legendary founder Romulus against the Sabine king Tatius, who also aided Rome’s last king 350 years later and king Servius Tullius during the Etruscan civil war, as well as defeating the sea monster Hippocampus.

According to Tuck, Caelius and Aulus were real Etruscan patriots during the sixth century BC, who assumed mythological status over time. Caelius eventually beheaded his brother. For this crime he was denied burial in Etruria. Aulus’s head was buried at the top of the Capitaline hill in Rome and rolled out as the temple of Jupiter was being built. The hill’s name Capitaline derives from the Latin “caput” for head.

Film can be viewed free with a library card on Kanopy.


*Claudius, who read and spoke Etruscan, wrote his 20-volume Etruscan history in Greek. He also wrote an Etruscan dictionary.

https://www.kanopy.com/en/pukeariki/watch/video/239710/239627

Kids Develop Headaches, Stomach Pain, Sleeping Issues While at Vacation Home Near Multiple 5G Antennas

Tower photo credit: Swedish Radiation Protection Foundation

By  Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.

Three children and their parents rapidly came down with multiple health problems — including sleep difficulties, headaches, stomach pain and skin rashes — when they stayed at a summer home 125 meters away from a cell tower with multiple 5G antennas, according to a new peer-reviewed case study.

The study, published Dec. 2 in the Annals of Clinical and Medical Case Reports, reported the family members’ symptoms subsided swiftly after they returned three days later to their regular home where they were exposed to much lower levels of 5G radiofrequency (RF) radiation.

The children — ages 4, 6 and 8 — also experienced emotional symptoms, such as heightened irritability, while staying at the summer home close to the 5G tower.

This is the sixth scientific report on the human health effects of real-life 5G radiofrequency (RF) radiation written by Dr. Lennart Hardell, a leading scientist on cancer risks from radiation, and Mona Nilsson. It is also the authors’ first report on how 5G affects the health of young children.

Hardell — an oncologist and epidemiologist with the Environment and Cancer Research Foundation who has authored more than 350 papers, almost 60 of which address RF radiation — said 5G radiation is especially a concern for children.

He told The Defender:

“It is well known in medicine that children are more sensitive to toxic agents than grownups. Moreover, they have a longer life expectancy so chronic health issues may develop over a longer time.”

5G’s real-life impact on children’s health has not been very well studied yet because the technology’s implementation is “quite new,” Hardell said.

Miriam Eckenfels-Garcia, director of Children’s Health Defense’s (CHD) Electromagnetic Radiation & Wireless program said the 5G rollout is “another example of financial and industry interests trumping the protection of our children’s health.”

She told The Defender:

“As in this case study, we see the negative health impacts of this technology and instead of applying the precautionary principle until we can determine the full scope of health and environmental impacts, our government agencies — captured by industry — are allowing 5G to be installed anywhere and everywhere.

“CHD is doing all it can to push back against this dangerous development through litigation, education and advocacy, and we are grateful to scientists like Dr. Hardell and Mona Nilsson for shining light on these cases.”

Kids had severe physical, emotional symptoms

The family stayed at the summer home July 29 through Aug. 1.

The parents completed a questionnaire about the symptoms they and each of their children experienced during their stay, before their stay and after returning to their permanent home.

They also ranked the severity of each symptom on a scale of 1 to 10. All three children had sleeping problems and emotional symptoms — labeled as “irritability” and “emotive” — ranked at a level 10. The study also reported:

“Two of the children got diarrhea, pain in the stomach and headache graded between 8 and 3 on the severity scale. The child aged 6 years who did not get pain in the stomach and diarrhea, got skin rashes graded 8 on the severity scale.

“… The symptoms appeared soon after the arrival to the house and disappeared after they came home, where radiation levels were considerably lower.”

Nilsson, managing director of the Swedish Radiation Protection Foundation, said she found it “very concerning” that the children got headaches and had sleeping problems.

“Children of that age should not be suffering from headaches nor sleeping problems,” she said, yet such symptoms are “expected effects from increasing exposure to RF radiation.”

Nilsson added:

“It’s been rather well known for many years that this kind of pulse-modulated radiation disturbs sleep and causes headache, that it affects the functioning of the brain in terms of reduced learning, memory and concentration and also [can cause] behavior changes.”

The case study illustrates “what is probably happening on a much broader scale — which is very alarming,” she said.

The parents reported severe fatigue, headaches and insomnia.

During the previous two summers, the family had rented the same house “without experiencing any health issues,” the report said.

In the summer of 2022, a telecommunication carrier installed 5G antennas. In late 2022, two additional carriers installed more 5G antennas on the tower.

Hardell and Nilsson on Oct. 9 took measurements around the summer cottage where the family stayed. The levels varied between 9,000 and 43,400 microwatts per square meter (μW/m2)

However, these numbers are likely lower than what the family experienced because the summer recreation area — which had nine more cottages, more than 70 apartments and over 400 camping spots — was mostly empty when the researchers took the readings.

This was “unfortunate,” Hardell and Nilsson said, because “during the actual stay when the area was fully occupied … the mobile phone traffic from the tower most likely was much higher.”

Most are unaware of 5G’s toxic effects

Hardell said, “People in general — and also the medical profession — are mostly uneducated and do not understand the toxic effects of 5G. The implementation of 5G is a very dangerous development both for human health and the environment.”

“The implementation of 5G goes ahead on its own track based on economic interests and regardless of scientific evidence of detrimental effects. Protests from scientists and NGOs [nongovernmental organizations] are unheard,” he said.

Hardell encouraged concerned parents to minimize their kids’ exposure to 5G radiation. “As we have shown, health is soon restored when people leave [the place with high 5G radiation] and go to a place with no 5G.”

“In fact,” he added, “our results show that 5G exposure is a classic ‘provocation test’ on health” because it clearly shows the symptoms that occur when a person is exposed to something — such as a new drug or new radiation level.

Realistically, though, most parents don’t have the economic means to relocate to a place with no 5G, he said. “Furthermore, 5G is expanding and will cover most of the country in the future.”

Hardell said it’s not fair that parents who value their children’s health should have to avoid vacationing sites or other places simply because of 5G. “After all, society is for all and nobody should be excluded,” Hardell said.

What’s the solution?

According to Hardell, “5G must be stopped until studies on human health and the environment have been made by scientists with no conflicts of interest.”

As of Oct. 12, 434 scientists and doctors had signed the 5G Appeal which calls for a halt to 5G until such research is done.

They sent their appeal to the European Union seven times “without any effect,” Hardell, from Sweden, said.

Citizens themselves must also stand up and demand a halt. “People must protest and make their voices be heard,” Hardell said. “The people must educate themselves, take measurements of the radiation, consider any new health problems and exert pressure on politicians for a change.”

The media also has “a huge responsibility” to open up the debate on 5G and inform the public about its dangers, he added.

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/kids-headaches-stomach-pain-sleeping-vacation-home-5g-antennas/

Short-Selling Deluge Points to Foreknowledge of October 7 Attacks

Ben Bartee

The results of a statistical analysis below, published in the Social Science Research Network, point quantitatively to prior knowledge among certain actors of the impending October 7 attack who, working on apparent inside knowledge, engaged in the short-selling of various stocks to a windfall of millions of dollars.

(“Short selling,” for the uninitiated, is the act of “borrowing” a stock from a broker and selling it with the expectation that the price will drop and then buying and returning it at a lower price for profit. In simpler times, it had a simpler name: usury. Jesus tossed with extreme prejudice the “money-changers” out of the temple because he recognized them are degenerate scum who produce nothing of value to society but parasitically suck up its capital with their various sordid schemes. Were I coronated, these people would be the first on the wall, which is why they’d have me killed before I got close to power. Alas, this tangent is a story for another day.)

Via Social Science Research Network:

“Recent scholarship shows that informed traders increasingly disguise trades in economically linked securities such as exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Linking that work to longstanding literature on financial markets’ reactions to military conflict, we document a significant spike in short selling in the principal Israeli-company ETF days before the October 7 Hamas attack. The short selling that day far exceeded the short selling that occurred during numerous other periods of crisis, including the recession following the financial crisis, the 2014 Israel-Gaza war, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Similarly, we identify increases in short selling before the attack in dozens of Israeli companies traded in Tel Aviv. For one Israeli company alone, 4.43 million new shares sold short over the September 14 to October 5 period yielded profits (or approximates avoided losses) of millions on that additional short selling for one out of hundreds of securities traded on the TASE

Our findings suggest that traders informed about the coming attacks profited from these tragic events, and consistent with prior literature we show that trading of this kind occurs in gaps in U.S. and international enforcement of legal prohibitions on informed trading. We contribute to the growing literature on trading related to geopolitical events and offer suggestions for policymakers concerned about profitable trading on the basis of information about coming military conflict.”

It should be noted that the authors of this study, Robert J. Jackson, Jr. and Joshua Mitts, are the Former Commissioner of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and a respected scholar at Columbia Law School — hardly what one might call your typical “right-wing domestic terrorist conspiracy theorist” or whatever.

Given the damning implications, the narrative control coming out of Israel appears frenzied and contradictory.

Via Reuters:

“The Tel Aviv Stock Exchange said on Tuesday a report by U.S. researchers suggesting there were investors in Israel who may have profited from prior knowledge of Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack was inaccurate and its publication irresponsible.”

The Times of Israel, alternatively, suggests that all of the short-selling was conducted by Hamas-affiliated operatives: “A recent study found that the Hamas terror group may have tried to profit off its October 7 assault on Israel, using advance knowledge of the attack to short-sell Israeli companies in the days leading up to the massacre.”

Even if one accepts the narrative that Hamas and its allies let in on the plan were entirely responsible for the nearly unprecedented short-selling (surpassing that of various other crises in recent history, as explained by Jackson and Mitts) — even though there’s no evidence of that — one would expect that Israeli intelligence, were it vigilant, would have pricked its ears up in the many days of the short-selling bonanza starting as early as September 14.

Instead, there are no reports of any investigations into the short-selling leading up to October 7, nor any official inquiry since.

The totality of evidence, as it mounts, which I have diligently chronicled, continues to make mincemeat of the official story that the Israeli government — home of arguably the most vaunted national security apparatus on Earth, engaged in constant, near-total surveillance of the Gaza Strip — was caught unawares on October 7.

[…]

Via https://armageddonprose.substack.com/p/damning-analysis-short-selling-deluge

80 Years of Lies About Pearl Harbor

uss arizona burns at Pearl Harbor

Jeremy Kuzmarov

Eighty two years ago today—on what President Franklin Roosevelt termed a “date which will live in infamy”—Japanese forces attacked the U.S. naval base at Pearl Harbor off the coast of Hawaii, triggering U.S. intervention in World War II.

Historian Samuel Elliot Morrison wrote that one could “search military history in vain for an operation more fatal to the aggressor.”[3] 2,403 Americans were killed and 1,143 were wounded. Eighteen ships were sunk or run aground, including five battleships.

In his address to the nation following the attacks, President Roosevelt stated that “the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the empire of Japan.”

This statement was a lie: The Roosevelt administration had provoked Japan by engaging in a naval buildup in the South Pacific and by enacting an oil embargo, which crippled Japan’s economy and threatened its access to vital raw materials in Manchuria.[5] Historian William Neumann concluded in a 1945 pamphlet “that this economic war could result in anything but a military conflict was extremely doubtful.”[6]

Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson wrote in his diary of a White House meeting on November 25, 1941, in which he explicitly raised the question of “how we should maneuver them into the position of firing the first shot.”[7]

Hatton W. Sumners (D-TX), the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, stated in April 1942 that “this blaming [of] the Pearl Harbor tragedy on the treachery of the Japs is like the fellow who had been tickling the hind leg of a mule trying to explain his bunged-up condition by blaming the mule for having violated his confidence.”[8]

President Roosevelt found himself in the position of tickling the hind leg of the Japanese mule because he knew that the American public would never support intervention in another world war unless the United States was attacked. A poll conducted by the American Institute of Public Opinion in 1936 had found that 95% of Americans would “today regard as imbecile anyone who might suggest that in the event of another European War, the United States should again participate in it.”[9]

In the months before the Pearl Harbor attack, military cryptanalysts had cracked the Japanese diplomatic and military code. They were hence privy to cables specifying that Japan had broken diplomatic relations, which was crucial because in all of Japan’s previous wars—including the war with China in 1895, with Russia in 1904, and with Germany launched at Tsingtao in 1914—the severing of diplomatic relations was followed by a sneak attack on the enemy.[10] The location of this attack was telegraphed also in other cables.[11]

British historian Captain Russell Grenfell wrote in 1952 that “no reasonably informed person can now believe that Japan made a villainous, unexpected attack on the United States. An attack was not only fully expected but was actually desired. It is beyond doubt that President Roosevelt wanted to get his country into the war, but for political reasons was most anxious to ensure that the first act of hostility came from the other side, to a point that no self-respecting nation could endure without resort to arms. Mr. Oliver Lyttleton, then British minister of production, said in 1944: ‘Japan was provoked into attacking America at Pearl Harbor. It is a travesty of history to say that America was forced into the war.’”[12]

Lost Chance for Peace

In the months leading up to Pearl Harbor, there was ample opportunity for FDR to have upheld his 1940 campaign pledge that American boys would not be sent into any foreign wars.

[…]

As late as October 1941, at the urging of China hands in the State Department, FDR rebuffed a peace overture by Prime Minister Prince Fumimaro Konoye, a moderate who was subsequently pushed out in favor of hardliner Hideki Tojo.[14]

The FDR administration did not want to be seen as condoning Japan’s conquests, though Konoye expressed willingness to withdraw Japanese troops from China and nullify participation in the Axis Pact with Germany and Italy.[15]

British diplomat Sir Robert Craigie felt that, as late as December 1941, the United States could have reached a compromise with Japan involving the withdrawal of Japanese troops from Indochina in exchange for the resumption of U.S. oil shipments to Japan, which had been cut off by embargo. Craigie noted that, by this time, the prospects of a German victory had begun to look doubtful, which made U.S. and British intervention in a Far East campaign less of a necessity.

[…]

“But they knew, they knew, they knew”

Right after Pearl Harbor, William Friedman, chief crypto-analyst of the Army Signal Corps whose team had solved Japan’s Purple code, paced back and forth in his home, his wife recalled, and muttered to himself repeatedly: “But they knew, they knew, they knew.”[18]

Robert Stinnett, a naval photographer during the Pacific War and author of Day of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor, notes that two intercepted radio dispatches sent by Japanese Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto to the Japanese First Air Fleet on November 25th pointed to the anchoring of 31 Japanese warships at Hitokappu Bay in the Kurile Islands, which were awaiting instructions to sail to Hawaii.

A subsequent decoded dispatch had Yamamoto directing the Japanese air fleet to depart Hitokappu on November 26th and advance into Hawaiian waters through the North Pacific before attacking the U.S. fleet in Hawaii. Yamamoto even provided the latitude and longitude for portions of the route, while calling for the dealing of the U.S. fleet in Hawaii a “mortal blow.”[19]

In January 1941, Joseph Grew had cabled Roosevelt to tell him that the Peruvian ambassador to Japan, Dr. Ricardo Schreiber, had told a member of his staff that he had heard from a Japanese source that the Japanese military forces planned, in the event of trouble with the United States, to attempt a surprise mass attack on Pearl Harbor using all their military facilities.[20]

Nine months later, in October, Roosevelt received another warning of impending attack at Pearl Harbor from the Kremlin, which had obtained the information through its spy Dr. Richard Sorge. The information had been passed along in return for U.S. warnings of an impending attack by Germany on Russia.[21]

Joe Lieb, a newspaper reporter who had served in the Roosevelt administration, claimed that his friend Cordell Hull confided to him on November 29, 1941, that President Roosevelt knew that the Japanese were going to attack Pearl Harbor within a few days, and that the President was going to let this happen as a way to get the country into war.

Hull was strongly against this scheme and turned over a document to Lieb, which allegedly concerned the Pearl Harbor plan and urged him to take it to the press without revealing who had leaked it. Only one newspaper took the story, however, The Honolulu Tribune Herald, which created a front-page banner headline in its Sunday, November 30, issue: “Japanese May Strike Over Weekend.”[22]

East Wind Rain

On November 19, 1941, the Japanese government had come to a secret decision that, if the country was to go to war with the United States, its diplomatic corps would be notified by insertion of a false weather report “east wind rain” in the middle of the daily language short-wave news broadcast.

When 52 suppressed pages of the Army Pearl Harbor Board report were finally made public on December 11, 1945, they disclosed that the Board had concluded that the “winds message” had indeed been inserted into the Japanese news and weather broadcast.

It was in turn picked up by a U.S. Navy monitoring station, translated on December 3, 1941, and its contents distributed to the White House, Army and Navy high commands—though not to Admiral Husband Kimmel and Lieutenant General Walter Short, the top military commanders in Hawaii (the two inexplicably were never provided with a decoding machine, and were refused clearance for viewing decrypted cables).[23]

Cryptographer Laurance Safford stated that his superiors ordered him to destroy the notes he had made concerning the “East Wind Rain” message.

[…]

Briggs said in this interview that he was the one who had intercepted this crucial message while on duty as a chief watch supervisor at the Naval communication station at Cheltenham, Maryland. Briggs further stated that he was ordered by his superior officer in 1946 not to testify about the matter to a Joint Congressional Committee and to cease any contact with Captain Safford.

[…]

Impending Attacks

In the last week of November 1941, Roosevelt warned diplomat William C. Bullitt against traveling across the Pacific, stating that he was “expecting the Japs to attack any time now, probably within the next three or four days.”[26]

[…]

A few weeks after the attack, FDR had set up an investigating commission under Supreme Court Justice Owen Roberts, a friend and supporter of the president, which released a 13,000-page report in January 1942 exonerating Executive Branch authorities of any wrongdoing and blamed Kimmel and Short for the disaster.[46]

Foreshadowing the Warren report following the JFK assassination, the Roberts Commission was an obvious whitewash. It did not interrogate senior FDR administration officials or inquire into Japanese intercepts and their distribution and evaluation in Washington or allow for Admiral Kimmel and General Short to defend themselves or for their attorneys to ask questions and cross-examine witnesses.[47]

[…]

Afterwards, Rear Admiral Leigh Noyes, the Navy’s Director of Communications, instituted a 54-year censorship policy that consigned the pre-Pearl Harbor Japanese military and diplomatic intercepts and the relevant directives to Navy vaults, while illegally ordering subordinates to “destroy all notes or anything in writing.” Fleet Admiral Ernest King threatened a loss of pension for any naval officer who disclosed the successful code breaking.[50]

Within the State Department—as Frank Schuler, Jr., reported in an unpublished memoir uncovered by researchers at the Roosevelt Library—Stanley K. Hornbeck, Alger Hiss, and other top officials also falsified or removed key documents that painted the Roosevelt administration in a negative light, and demoted staffers like Schuler who threatened to expose this cover-up.

Percy L. Greaves, Jr., who headed the congressional investigation into Pearl Harbor, pointed out that those who maintained secrecy, failed to remember, or testified on behalf of the administration in the Pearl Harbor investigations rose very quickly to high places.

These people include Gen. George Marshall, who was made a permanent five-star general and the Secretary of State, Col. Walter Bedell Smith, who became a three-star general and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)’s second director.[51]

On the other hand, virtually no one who testified in the various hearings as to the facts that were damaging to the Roosevelt administration and their superiors was ever promoted or rewarded.

The Truth Emerges

A week after V-J Day, President Harry S. Truman made public the lengthy findings of 1943 and 1944 Army and Navy Boards appointed to assess responsibility for Pearl Harbor. The Army Board, headed by Lieutenant General George Grunert, reversed the verdict of the Roberts Commission and concluded that “responsible authorities all expected an air attack before Pearl Harbor.”

[…]

A July 1946 Senate committee headed by Senator Alben Barkley (D-KY), which journalist William H. White characterized as “one of the longest and most extraordinary [investigations] in the history of any country,” subsequently concluded that the “one o’clock intercept should have been recognized [in Washington] as indicating the distinct possibility that some Japanese military action would occur somewhere at 1 P.M., December 7, Washington time. If properly appreciated, this intercept should have suggested a dispatch to all Pacific outpost commanders supplying this information.”[55]

The committee also found that Japanese message intercepts “should have been [properly] appreciated and supplied to the commander-in-chief of the Pacific Fleet and the commanding General of the Hawaiian Department,” an indictment of Washington authorities for their failure to appreciate and offer warning in advance of the danger of attack.[56]

A minority report issued by Senators Homer Ferguson (R-MI) and Owen Brewster (R-ME) placed ultimate blame for Pearl Harbor with the commander-in-chief, Franklin D. Roosevelt, who was “responsible for the failure to enforce continuous, efficient and appropriate cooperation” among his high officials “in evaluating information and dispatching clear and positive orders to the Hawaiian commanders as events indicated the growing imminence of war.”

[…]

Via https://covertactionmagazine.com/2023/12/07/eighty-years-of-lies-president-franklin-roosevelt-told-public-pearl-harbor-was-a-surprise-attack-however-there-is-considerable-evidence-demonstrating-government-foreknowledge-2/

Russia Sends 27.5 Tons of Humanitarian Aid to Gaza

Palestinians at a food distribution point in Gaza, 2023.

Palestinians at a food distribution point in Gaza, 2023. | Photo: X/ @mhdksafa

teleSUR Newsletter

This new cargo includes mattresses, blankets, personal care products and food.

On Wednesday, the Russian Emergency Situations Ministry sent a plane to Egypt with 27.5 tons of humanitarian aid destined for the population of the Gaza Strip.

The cargo includes mattresses, blankets, personal care products and food. This new shipment seeks to somewhat alleviate the sufferings of thousands of Palestinians whom the Israeli occupation forces have been attacking for almost two months.

The humanitarian aid will be delivered to representatives of the Egyptian Red Crescent, to be later sent to the Palestinian territory.

On November 24, the Emergency Situations Ministry also sent a batch of humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip after the ceasefire that Hamas and Israel agreed to.

On that occasion, the Russian government sent 15 tons of supplies that included baby food, hygiene items, sheets, blankets and sleeping bags.

On Thursday, Egypt’s State Information Service (SIS) reported that authorities are currently making utmost efforts with partners in a bid to summarize the Israel-Hamas truce in the Gaza Strip and extend it further until reaching a comprehensive ceasefire.

“Until this happens, Egypt will continue its cooperation with partners to work to accelerate the transfer of humanitarian and relief aid to the Gaza Strip,” SIS Director Diaa Rashwan said.

Israel and the Gaza-ruling Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) reached a 7-day ceasefire brokered by Egypt, Qatar and the United States from Nov. 24 to 30, after which Israel resumed its deadly siege and bombardment of the Palestinian enclave.

The Rafah border crossing between Egypt and Gaza has been the only lifeline to provide the enclave with relief supplies donated by Egypt and other countries as well as local and international organizations.

Since October 7, indiscriminate bombings carried out by Israeli occupation forces have killed over 17,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry.

[…]

Via https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Russia-Sends-27.5-Tons-of-Humanitarian-Aid-to-Gaza-20231207-0007.html

Newsweek Reports on Arrest of New Zealand Whistleblower

A New Zealand man was recently arrested after allegedly illegally accessing COVID-19 vaccine data from the country’s health agency.

Barry Young, 56, a former IT employee at Te Whatu Ora, the country’s health agency, was arrested and accused of illegally obtaining COVID-19 vaccine data and sharing it on the internet, the New Zealand Herald reported this week.

On Tuesday, Young appeared on Infowars,where he was interviewed by the show’s host conspiracy theorist Alex Jones.

“I just looked at the data and what I was seeing, since the rollout, it just blew my mind. I was just seeing more and more people dying that shouldn’t have been dying. It was just obvious,” Young told Jones.

Following the leak, Te Whatu Ora Chief Executive Margie Apa issued a statement saying: “From what we have established to date, the individual downloaded a large amount of vaccine related information. We are still working to confirm the full extent of this activity. The data, as published on an overseas site, appears to have been anonymised. Analysis of the released data is ongoing but work so far has not found any National Health Index Numbers or personally identifiable information.

The incident comes as COVID-19 vaccine skeptics have continued to question the efficacy of the inoculation. Many conservatives initially criticized COVID-19 vaccine requirements in the U.S. and others have questioned if the vaccine could be linked to deaths of some high-profile people, including Friends star Matthew Perry.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton recently announced that he was suing vaccine manufacturer Pfizer “for unlawfully misrepresenting the effectiveness of the company’s COVID-19 vaccine and attempting to censor public discussion of the product.”

According to the NZ Herald, Young appeared in Wellington District Court on Monday and was granted bail to be released a day later. Young was heard yelling “freedom” as he was leaving court on Monday.

“I want people to analyze this, I want people to look at it…we need to open it up and the government needs to have an inquiry about it. Just bring it to the public’s attention,” Young said.

Young added that he noticed some “really big red flags,” in the data he accessed. He said he was accessing the data and noticing more deaths caused by the COVID-19 vaccine in New Zealand compared to the numbers released by the health agency.

Apa disputed Young’s claims, saying in the statement: “What this individual is trying to claim about vaccines is completely wrong and ill-informed and their comments demonstrate this. The person has no clinical background or expert vaccine knowledge and appears to be trying to spread misinformation.”

Newsweek reached out to Te Whatu Ora via email for comment.

[…]

Via https://www.newsweek.com/covid-vaccine-death-data-leak-sparks-arrest-it-blew-my-mind-1850080