John Shipton

The Assange Story

RT (2020)

Film Review

https://en.rtdoc.tv/films/206-the-assange-story

Mainly based on interviews with Assange’s father antiwar activist John Shipton, this 2020 documentary provides the first comprehensive biography on Julian Assange I’ve seen.

Julian grew up in Melbourne Australia, which in the late eighties and early nineties was the Australian center for international hackers and “experimenters.” As a teenager, Assange and his friends spend most of their spare time trading hacking programs. In 1989, the Melbourne hacking syndicate broke into the NASA computer and infected it with a “wank worm” containing a message about warmongering. The breach would force NASA to postpone a shuttle launch.

By 2006, Assange was less interested in hacking than in material he discovered on-line related to constant lies the US and other governments told the public. The same year he and hacking friends founded Wikileaks, using the Tor* server as an anonymizer for government whistleblowers to share embarrassing documents. The first leaks Wikileaks made public concerned Somali government malfeasance. In 2009, they exposed the Climategate emails revealing climate scientists were faking data about global warming.

In 2010, Wikileaks made world headlines after they published the Collateral Murder video. Shot by US troops from an Apache helicopter gun-sight, it clearly shows the deliberate unprovoked killing of 12-18 Iraqis civilians, including a Reuters journalist, his rescuers and two young children.

Wikileaks’ next major leak concerned monitoring by US intelligence of all private gmail, iPhone and Blackberry communications.

On November 28 2010, Wikileaks shared their third major leak, consisting of 400,000 classified cables from 2001-2009 about the US coverup of Iraqi civilian deaths, torture of Iraqi prisoners and child prostitution. The New York Times, the Guardian and Der Spiegel eagerly collaborated with them in releasing this explosive material.

Although Wikileaks offered the Obama White House the opportunity (which they declined) to review the logs before they were published, Obama immediately accused Wikileaks of endangering Afghans who helped US occupying forces in Afghanistan. On November 30, Interpol issued an Interpol Red Notice for Assange’s arrest for sexual assaults that allegedly occurred in Sweden mid-August.** He was arrested in Britain, having left Sweden after the Swedish prosecutor assured his lawyer there were no arrest charges against him.

In May 2012 after losing his Supreme Court appeal against extradition to Sweden (based on fears Sweden would extradite him to the US where he potentially faced the death penalty), Assange was granted asylum in London’s Ecuadoran embassy.

He spent the next eight years in the tiny Ecuadoran embassy (a three-bedroom apartment), confined to a single room and foregoing access to sunlight or dental or medical care. Wikileaks continued to operate from the Ecuadoran embassy, releasing another high profile leak in 2016, of DNC emails regarding a deliberate Democratic Party conspiracy to sabotage Bernie Sanders primary campaign.

Six years into his stay, Ecuador elected a pro-US government, and the new president Lenin Moreno did everything he could to force Assange to leave voluntarily. This included denying him access to his lawyers and razors, searching his visitors, putting surveillance cameras in his room and periodically neglecting to provide food and toilet paper. They Ecuadoran government also released media stories about Assange being messy, having poor hygiene and smearing feces on the walls. After 18 months, the Ecuadoran government allowed British police into the embassy (which is sovereign Ecuadoran territory under international law) to arrest him.

The US immediately filed for his extradition on espionage charges, but the UK forced him to serve his 11 month sentence first for breaching his parole.

Afternote: During his 2022 extradition trial and subsequent appeals, Assange was confined to Belmarsh high security prison, where he was denied Internet and telephone and forbidden to fraternize with other prisoners.

In June 2024 he was finally released from prison after pleading guilty to a single charge of “conspiracy to obtain and disclose classified US defense documents.” He was released at a hearing in the US District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands, and from there flew home to Australia.***

*Tor is a free overlay network for enabling anonymous communication. Built on free and open-source software and more than seven thousand volunteer-operated relays, users can have their Internet traffic routed via a random path through the network

**See Sex Lies and Julian Assange

***See Assange is Free: Wikileaks Founder Freed in Deal with US

Criminal migrants arriving at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba on Feb. 4, 2025. US Department of Defense/AFP via Getty Images

By Jennie Taer and Chris Nesi

A second deportation flight carrying 13 Venezuelan gang members wanted for a range of violent crimes departed El Paso, Texas, for Guantanamo Bay in Cuba Thursday.

The flight roster includes a Tren de Aragua gang member who committed a homicide and another who admitted he is wanted in Venezuela for escaping from jail, aggravated robbery with a weapon and intent to commit homicide, according to a Homeland Security official.

Other offenses the migrants are accused of include possession of dangerous drugs, robbery, assault, fraud and entering the US illegally, the official said.

The flight comes 48 hours after the first such planeload, which left Fort Bliss, Texas, Tuesday carrying about a dozen “highly dangerous” illegal migrants, including 10 Tren de Aragua gangbangers.

The prison complex located in the south of Cuba became known for housing notorious criminals including 9/11 plotters, and has been newly repurposed to house criminal migrants as part of President Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration.

[…]

https://nypost.com/2025/02/06/us-news/second-group-of-migrant-criminals-including-one-tren-de-aragua-killer-sent-to-guantanamo-bay/

By Jefferey Jaxen

The recent Telegraph headline rang out of England recently with unsettling tones: Tenth of farmland to be axed for net zero

More than 10 per cent of farmland in England is set to be diverted towards helping to achieve net zero and protecting wildlife by 2050, the Environment Secretary will reveal on Friday.

Swathes of the countryside are on course to be switched to solar farms, tree planting and improving habitats for birds, insects and fish.

The move comes on the back of an aggressive and highly unpopular inheritance tax placed on generational farmers by British politician Rachel Reeves that has drawn sustained protest in the country. The commercial officer of Britain’s largest supermarket chain Tesco warned Reeves’ tax raid on farmers is placing “UK’s future food security is at stake.”

What if that’s the whole point? Tucker Carlson recently asked Piers Morgan this uncomfortable question.

Morgan refused to let his mind go there. And for good reason. It’s a dark premise. Yet one with historical context that must be analyzed due to the aggressive moves now in play against farmers around the world and humanity at large.

The British East India Company was the early template for the modern mega-corporate monopoly, globalization & vehicle to expand colonial power. Eventually dominating trade between Indian and Britain and far beyond. To say the company’s practices were ruthless would be putting it lightly.

Thomas Malthus was the East India Company’s first economist training individuals for service as administrators for the organization. Malthus was also a eugenicist in the economic wheelhouse of the world’s largest corporate monopoly with its own private army.

He wrote the following in his 1798 Essay on the Principle of Population:

The power of population is so superior to the power in the earth to produce subsistence for man, that premature death must in some shape or other visit the human race. The vices of mankind are active and able ministers of depopulation. They are the precursors in the great army of destruction; and often finish the dreadful work themselves. But should they fail in this war of extermination, sickly seasons, epidemics, pestilence, and plague, advance in terrific array, and sweep off their thousands and ten thousands. Should success be still incomplete, gigantic inevitable famine stalks in the rear, and with one mighty blow levels the population with the food of the world. 

Eugenicists aren’t picky. Whatever gets people off the planet en masse – they’re into. Notice his last sentence, when bases are loaded and “success be still incomplete,” it’s the famine that is the preferred home run hitter – the weapon of choice.

In the 1860s, the full weight of the East India Company’s monopoly helped kill off India’s economy of textile industries putting countless out of work and forcing them into agriculture. This, in turn, made the Indian economy much more dependent on the whims of seasonal monsoons as dry seasons gripped the country.

The Indian and British press carried reports of rising prices, dwindling grain reserves, and the desperation of peasants no longer able to afford rice.

All of this did little to stir the colonial administration into action. In the mid-19th Century, it was common economic wisdom that government intervention in famines was unnecessary and even harmful. The market would restore a proper balance. Any excess deaths, according to Malthusian principles, were nature’s way of responding to overpopulation. 

-BBC

The current overlay argument government, NGOs, and global bodies like the United Nations are using to interrupt farming during present day is because of ‘net zero’ goals.

[See video below on the origin of the ‘climate crisis’ narrative highlighting the Club of Rome’s hand in crafting the modern day operation.]

Cows create greenhouse gases, carbon emissions from fertilizers, destruction of wildlife, and people themselves are all, we are told to believe, BIG negatives for the earth. Therefore they must be reduced.

Not in an orderly way, but as fast as possible because we’re told change in climate is the biggest, world-ending threat humans face – or something like that.

The United Nations [think Agenda 2030, Paris Agreement] has been the prime mover, policy-shaping action arm to accomplish this ‘net zero’ utopia. Enter Julian Huxley.

Huxley emerges after World War 2 as a crucial bridging figure from what has been referred to as “old eugenics” [Malthus] to a new eugenics based on molecular biology and human evolution.

In 1945 as World War 2 was ending, the United Nations was founded in New York. That same year, the United Nations Conference for the Establishment of an Education and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) was also founded in London with Julian Huxley becoming the first Director-General.

One year later Huxley wrote UNESCO ITS PURPOSE AND ITS PHILOSOPHY stating:

At the moment, it is probable that the indirect effect of civilisation is dysgenic instead of eugenic; and in any case it seems likely that the dead weight of genetic stupidity, physical weakness, mental instability, and disease-proneness, which already exist in the human species, will prove too great a burden for real progress to be achieved. Thus even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for Unesco to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable. 

As it appears we are now in the home stretch of the environmental overlay of modern-day eugenics, the consensus-building and subtle messaging are being done away with.

A 2022 research article published in the journal Social Studies of Science titled Environmental Malthusianism and Demography writes:

Some bioethicists argue that, because ‘we are threatened with more population than the planet can bear’, humans simply ‘don’t have a right to more than one biological child’ (Conly, 2016: 2). Some recommend that governments act to uphold this limit (Hickey et al., 2016). Even feminist historians and sociologists of science, including some sharp critics of the population control projects of the late 20th century, now call for measures to reduce childbearing as a means of combatting climate change. Environmental Malthusianism, the idea that human population growth is the primary driver of environmental harms and population control a prerequisite to environmental protection, is experiencing a resurgence.

[…[

Via https://brownstone.org/articles/the-real-purpose-of-net-zero/

Drago Bosnic

At some point, the unfortunate Ukrainian people will simply have to get rid of NATO occupation and form an independent government that would come to an agreement with Russia and finally end the conflict.

The only way for them to normalize relations with their eastern neighbor is to get rid of the political West and its Neo-Nazi proxies. Even that would just be the first step, as it would take quite an effort to convince the Kremlin that all that would be genuine.

Since taking office approximately two weeks ago, US President Donald Trump has suggested that Russia should “end the war immediately”. This notion has also been proposed by the mainstream propaganda machine quite consistently in the last almost three years. However, the Kremlin has been reluctant to jump the gun, and for good reason. Namely, it’s not easy to end something that you didn’t start in the first place.

All available evidence suggests that NATO orchestrated the Ukrainian conflict as part of its wider crawling aggression against Russia and the multipolar (i.e. actual) world. Trump himself has admitted this on numerous occasions, even pointing out that the war would’ve never happened had he been in power. This is essentially an indirect admission that the troubled Biden administration started the war through endless provocations and aggressive posturing toward Moscow.

The second reason is that NATO-occupied Ukraine is run by Neo-Nazi proxies who have turned this ancient Russian land and people into an anti-Russia that built its identity on the total refusal of any connections with its eastern neighbor and on rabid Russophobia in general. In fact, the Kiev regime has positioned itself as a strategic springboard against the Eurasian giant, expressing readiness to “bleed for a NATO mission”.

The sheer magnitude of genocidal war crimes committed by these NATO-backed puppets goes far beyond the scope of this analysis, so we can mention only a few things, like the fact that former Ukraine has suffered a demographic disaster not seen since WWII, to say nothing of the decade-long shelling of the people of Donbass. Gruesome war crimes have also continued elsewhere in the area, both against civilians in Russian regions and in NATO-occupied Ukraine itself.

Moscow has been trying to negotiate a peaceful settlement for approximately a decade, including after the start of the special military operation (SMO) on February 24, 2022. However, all these attempts have been futile, as the Neo-Nazi junta is simply incapable of telling the truth, let alone keeping its word. Subsequent “peace summits” have been nothing more than propaganda gatherings designed to present the Kiev regime as “willing to end the war”.

Thus, it’s quite clear that the Kremlin has nothing to talk about with such terrorist entities. However, this begs the question, why doesn’t Russia simply launch a massive offensive on a strategic level and just knock down this criminal regime? Well, there’s far more to this than meets the eye. Namely, at least two dozen million people are living under NATO occupation in Ukraine now. The political West and its Neo-Nazi puppets are responsible for keeping this satellite state afloat.

However, with the United States under Donald Trump embracing an increasingly Pilatian policy toward the Kiev regime, the European parts of NATO and its geopolitical pendant, the EU, will be responsible for financing the state apparatus. With dwindling funds, this bureaucracy will become unviable and if Russia were to suddenly launch a massive offensive and retake Ukraine, it would also have to shoulder this burden.

Not to mention that this state apparatus has been vetted to include only those who are Russophobic to the core, so the Kremlin would effectively be feeding the dog that has been biting its hand. As a result, Moscow is in no hurry to end the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict and is willing to wait as long as it takes. At some point, the unfortunate Ukrainian people will simply have to get rid of this NATO occupation and form an independent government that would come to an agreement with Russia and finally end the conflict.

The only way for them to normalize relations with their eastern neighbor is to get rid of the political West and its Neo-Nazi proxies. Even that would just be the first step, as it would take quite an effort to convince the Kremlin that all that would be genuine. Namely, the questions of territorial integrity and security guarantees are the primary concerns for the Russian state.

There’s simply no way that its leadership will ever accept any foreign military presence in Ukraine, to say nothing of tolerating local armed forces that the High Command in Moscow would consider a threat to Russian national security interests. The Kiev regime is a major headache as is, so accepting the existence of any postwar Ukrainian state that wouldn’t cooperate with the Kremlin is simply off the table. This includes a thorough restructuring of the state apparatus, meaning that the dismantling of the Neo-Nazi junta is a must.

Any attempt to keep it alive will result in the prolonging of the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict, as Russia doesn’t need “peace deals” that would turn into yet another ruse to buy time for the rebuilding of the Kiev regime’s military power. Thus, the Kremlin will keep exerting incremental pressure and continue advancing on the frontlines, while letting the Neo-Nazi junta fester.

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/why-russia-doesnt-end-ukrainian-conflict-immediately/5879128

Footage from the Defense Department shows Marines boarding a plane bound for Guantanamo Bay from an air base in North Carolina on Sunday. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images, left; DOD via AP, right)

By Michael Dorgan , Greg Wehner Fox News

The Trump administration has begun flying detained illegal migrants from the U.S. to Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Tuesday.

The move comes just days after President Donald Trump announced that he would instruct the Pentagon to prepare the facility to hold around 30,000 “criminal illegal aliens” at the U.S. military base.

“I can also confirm that today the first flights from the United States to Guantanamo Bay with illegal migrants are underway,” Leavitt said.

Leavitt said that El Salvador has agreed to the repatriation of its own citizens as well as also “illegal criminals from other nations” who will then be sent to their prisons.

“Venezuela as well has agreed to repatriation flights and Colombia also agreed to cooperate with the repatriation of illegal Colombian nationals that we have found in the interior of our country.”

One flight from Fort Bliss to Guantanamo has roughly a dozen migrants on board, the Pentagon confirmed to Fox News. An additional flight left the U.S. on Monday, the Wall Street Journal reported.

The migrants will be held in the detention facility that was set up for post-Sept. 11 detainees. They will be separated from the 15 detainees already there, including the Sept. 11 planners like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

Around 150 Marines are at the Naval Station and have set up tents for around 1,000 migrants in the other part of the Naval Base. But those facilities with latrines and showers are not yet ready for an onslaught of 30,000 migrants as promised by Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem told Fox News’ Will Cain on the “Will Cain Show” last week that Guantanamo Bay is already being used to house illegal immigrants, particularly the worst of the worst.

Noem said her department will make sure resources are placed there to ensure there is enough space to get criminal illegal aliens out of the U.S.

Trump last week signed a presidential memorandum last week to begin the process of making 30,000 beds available at Guantanamo to house migrants who pose a threat to the American public, adding that putting them there will ensure they do not come back.

“Some of them are so bad, we don’t even trust their countries to hold them because we don’t want them coming back,” Trump said. “We’re going to send them to Guantanamo.”

He added, “It’s a tough place to get out of.”

The president said the move will bring the U.S. one step closer to “eradicating the scourge” of migrant crime in communities, once and for all.

The migrant facility at the base is separate from the high-security U.S. prison for foreign terrorism suspects – which has been used occasionally for decades, including to hold Haitians and Cubans picked up at sea.

The Trump administration has not said how much it would cost to expand Guantanamo, which was established in 2002 to detain foreign militants in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States.

He also called on Congress to provide full funding for the complete and total restoration of U.S. borders and financial support to remove record numbers of illegal aliens.

Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel last week called Trump’s move to send 30,000 migrants to Guantanamo an “act of brutality.”

“In an act of brutality, the new US government announces the imprisonment at the Guantanamo Naval Base, located in illegally occupied territory [of Cuba], of thousands of migrants that it forcibly expels, and will place them next to the well-known prisons of torture and illegal detention,” he said in a translated post on X.

[…]

Via https://www.foxnews.com/politics/us-begins-flying-migrants-guantanamo-bay

By PERKIN AMALARAJ

While many of the terms of the reported plans include concessions for Ukraine, Trump is also reportedly planning on continuing American support for Ukraine’s military, as well as a pathway for it to join the EU by 2030.

But Russia would also make significant gains as the plans include lifting sanctions on Russian energy over several years, though money from special duties on energy will be used to help fund Ukraine’s rebuilding efforts.

Zelensky’s office has strenuously denied the legitimacy of the peace plans.

Andriy Yermak, the head of the Office of the President of Ukraine, wrote on Telegram that they did not ‘exist in reality’, adding that such reports often disguised allegations spread by Russians.

Zelensky told media groups on Sunday: ‘Russia’s war is against Ukraine, against Europe, against the whole world, but above all, the war is waged on our land. It is impossible to exclude Ukraine from any negotiating platform.

‘Either this negotiating platform will have no real results, or it will have only political results. And such results will have nothing to do with security or the end of the war.’

He added: ‘I would really like the European voice to be there as well. It is important for us because we will be members of the European Union.

‘But I can’t say clearly today what the structure of the negotiation process will be. Because we do not have a joint plan yet.’

Russia, meanwhile, said that the US is yet to offer any substantial details on the ceasefire deal.

Moscow’s foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said: ‘Right now there are a lot of words, a lot of statements.

‘There is no clarity or certainty about the steps being taken. Therefore, it would be premature to discuss the prospects of negotiations or anything in general in this context… We will focus on specific steps and actions.’

Russia currently controls around 20% of Ukraine’s territory, and has held widely disregarded referendums in four regions in which they ‘voted’ to join Russia.

Zelensky previously claimed that he would never allow an acre of land to remain in Putin’s hands, but has also admitted that land may not be returned to Ukraine immediately.

[…]

Via https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14367923/Trump-peace-plan-Ukraine-Putin-ceasefire-Easter-Zelensky-NATO.html

Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD

Criminal complaint against Federal Councillor Rösti for failure to act in an acute danger situation

The Swiss Scientific group WIR, whose research and interview with Reinette Senum I wrote about has filed a criminal complaint against the authorities in Switzerland for ignoring the imminent danger to the population.

Nanotechnological Poisons From Above – Swiss Research Team Reveals Geoengineering “Spider Filaments” Are Polyamide Nanofibers Delivering Highly Toxic Chemicals – We Are Inhaling Them

Bravo! On February 19th I will be joining the team with Reinette for an international live stream. I hope others will take note of this great work by our Swiss colleagues and start filing criminal complaints against their governments for poisoning the people and ignoring the issue.

We have to demand to end this depopulation effort from the skies!

___________________________________________________________________________

A-POST REGISTERED MAIL / 98.00.992205.01114544

Federal Prosecutor’s Office
Guisanplatz 1
CH-3003 Bern Eriz, February 4, 2025

CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

Criminal charges filed against Federal Councillor Albert Rösti and Yves Bichsel for negligent or intentional omission in an acute danger situation (imminent danger). Despite scientific evidence of the release of toxic threads, no protective measures were taken.

Ladies and Gentlemen

I hereby file a CRIMINAL COMPLAINT against:

1. Mr Albert Rösti , in his capacity as Federal Councillor and Head of the Federal Department of Environment , Transport , Energy and Communications (DETEC), and
2. Mr. Yves Bichsel , UVEK Secretary General

In the name of protecting public health, the environment and the safety of the population, I hereby file a criminal complaint against Federal Councillor Albert Rösti on suspicion of negligent or intentional omission in connection with an acute dangerous situation (“imminent danger”).

Despite clear, scientifically proven evidence of a serious threat from the release of toxic threads throughout Switzerland – with proven effects on humans, animals and the environment – the responsible federal authority under the leadership of Federal Councillor Rösti has neither taken appropriate protective measures nor shown adequate responses to urgent warnings and analyses.

The facts are clear:

• Concrete evidence was provided by independent, highly professional laboratory analyses.
• Repeated requests to the responsible federal authorities remained unanswered or were dismissed with evasive, inadequate answers.
• Imminent danger : Continued inaction not only represents a failure of administration but actively endangers the life and health of the population and the integrity of the environment.

In accordance with the provisions of the Swiss Criminal Code (StGB), in particular the articles on abuse of office (Art. 312 StGB) , breach of the duty of care (Art. 128 StGB) and endangering life and public health (Art. 129 StGB) , I demand the immediate initiation of criminal investigations.

I request:

1. The immediate opening of an investigation against Federal Councillor Albert Rösti.
2. Ensuring all relevant documents, communication protocols and decision-making processes.
3. The criminal prosecution of all other persons involved in the inaction or deliberate delay.

This criminal complaint will attract both national and international attention, as the dimension of the problem extends far beyond national borders.

In the interest of justice and the protection of the population, I expect your immediate confirmation of receipt and prompt processing of this application.

Detailed facts

1. Physical and chemical properties of the threads

• These threads are hollow and consist of nanoscale polyamide structures with a diameter of about 4 to 6 micrometers. Their structure and properties differ clearly from natural spider webs or similar biological materials.
• Chemical analyses have identified more than 30 different substances, including highly flammable, toxic and harmful compounds such as:
  • Benzene derivatives: These substances are considered carcinogenic and highly toxic.
    • Epoxides and ketones: chemicals with high hazard potential.
    • Histamine derivatives: substances with possible biological effects.
• In addition, an increased aluminum content was detected, which could indicate possible geoengineering activities or experimental technologies. Other metals such as iron, copper and chromium were detected in trace amounts.

2. Relevance of scientific research

• Scientific analyses carried out by independent laboratories show that the chemical composition of these threads poses a significant risk to humans, animals and the environment .
• The use of modern analytical methods such as FTIR and Py-GCMS has shown that the threads are not of natural origin and suggest experimental, industrial processes, or even hostile and military operations. They may also have been released intentionally. (See the Scientific Investigations section for details).
• International reporting and scientific analyses on similar phenomena:

USA:

• Exclusive report from European researchers (Reinette Senum’s Foghorn Express)
• Nanotechnological poisons from the atmosphere (Dr. Ana Mihalcea)

Italy:

• After years of silence, interest in falling spider webs (NoGeoingegneria) awakens

3. Responsibility and official duties of the accused

As a sworn Federal Councillor and head of the Federal Department of Environmental Protection, Mr Albert Rösti is obliged to ensure the protection of the environment and the health of the population in accordance with the relevant legal requirements of the Federal Constitution and environmental laws. These official duties include in particular the control and prevention of environmental hazards caused by chemical or other harmful substances.

The repeated and documented spread of these poisonous threads on private initiative represents a risk to the environment and health that falls under the supervisory duties of the Federal Department of the Environment, Transport and Communications (DETEC). Failure to investigate and contain these risks therefore constitutes a breach of official duties under Articles 11 and 312 of the Criminal Code (abuse of office).

There is a reasonable suspicion that, despite repeated warnings about the problem, Mr Rösti did not take appropriate measures to prevent a threat to public health and the environment.

4. Legal assessment

The available findings indicate violations of the following legal bases:

1. Federal Constitution:
   • Art. 2 Purpose (protection of the rights of the people and security of the country)
   • Art. 3 Cantonal sovereignty (intervention by the federal government and internal omission)
   • Article 5, paragraphs 1-4, principles of constitutional action!
   • Art. 7 – 10 Human dignity to the right to life and personal freedom
   • Art. 35 Guarantee of Fundamental Rights (Obligation for Authorities)
   • Art. 57 Security – Protection of the population (including against hybrid attacks)
   • Art. 74 Environmental protection – Liability – Jurisdiction
   • Art. 76 / 77 Water Protection – Forest Protection
   • Art. 79 / 80 Fishing and hunting – animal protection
   • Art. 102 / 104 National Supply – Agriculture (Protection from Chemicals)
   • Art. 118 – 120 Protection of health – Protection from poison and genetic engineering
   • Art. 185 External and internal security (also against hybrid attacks)

1. Swiss Criminal Code (StGB):
   • Art. 11 Committing an offense by omission in conjunction with StPO Art. 302 Duty to report
   • Art. 128 Violation of the duty of care
   • Art. 129 Endangerment of life (through publicly distributed poisonous substances)
   • Art. 186 Trespassing (spreading poisonous substances in the yard or garden)

crimes and offenses against public health

1. Art. 230 – 232 (Release / hazard with toxic substances and organisms)
2. Art. 234 / 235 Contamination of drinking water and feed (grass, herbs, etc.)

crimes against humanity

1. Art. 264 Use of biological or chemical substances (hybrid attack)

Crimes and offenses against the state / administration of justice

1. Art. 275 Endangerment and disruption of the constitutional order
2. Art. 312 Abuse of office

1. Environmental Protection Act:
   • obligation to prevent environmental hazards
   • International Agreements: Violations of the Precautionary Principle
2. UN: Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques (AS 1988 1888; BBl 1987 III 797)
   • National and possibly international perpetrators are currently violating the declaration of the United Nations Conference on Climate Change adopted in Stockholm on 16 June 1972.
   • The violation lies in the intentional or negligent use of environmentally altering technologies that cause significant harm to our country, other states, the global environment, and people and animals.

risk assessment and urgency

The proven toxic properties of the threads represent an acute danger that requires immediate action. In particular, the potential use of these threads as a transport medium for chemical or biological substances poses considerable risks. The lack of official response by Mr Albert Rösti exacerbates these risks and raises the question of whether this was done negligently or intentionally. A further failure to investigate is irresponsible.

demands

1. Initiation of an investigation to clarify whether Mr Albert Rösti has fulfilled his official duties in his capacity as Federal Councillor.
2. Investigation of the origin, mode of distribution and intention of these poisonous threads.
3. Identification of the responsible persons, companies or institutions.
4. Examination of possible links to experimental or military activities.
5. Immediate measures to prevent further dangers.
6. Transparent information to the public.
7. Criminal assessment and sanctions

evidence

• Results of laboratory analyses (detailed reports in the appendix)
• Photographs and physical samples of the discovered threads (location, date, etc.)
• Testimonials from those affected and experts
• Patents:
  • https://www.vereinwir.ch/spinnenfaeden/#flipbook-252410/1/
  • https://www.vereinwir.ch/spinnenfaeden/#flipbook-meso-und-nanoroehren/1/
• Scientific reports from independent laboratories
• Documentation on flight and weather phenomena in the affected regions
• Information about further information and video discussions
  • https://www.vereinwir.ch/spinnenfaeden/

[…]

Via https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/swiss-scientists-file-criminal-complaint