As president Putin has emphasized at various times, not only has it never been proven that human-made CO2 drives climate variations, but it has also come to light that since 1998, the warming trend dominant since 1977 has been on an strange “pause”. While CO2 output steadly rose from 1938-1977, it was accompanied by a total cooling causing scientists in 1977 to sound the alarm that we were on the verge of an ice age.
This fact reflects the embarrassing reality that CO2 tends to follow climate variations rather than precede them, indicating that this greenhouse gas is actually being effected by the warming of the earth most likely driven by space-based causes as Putin has referred repeatedly. Even more surprising to some, recently published NASA studies have shown that the world’s biomass has increased by 10% in recent years due in large measure to the industrial growth policies of China and India. Plants have, after all, been observed to grow much better when fed by increased levels of carbon dioxide.
Ever since ancient times, it was understood that no political structure can function through simply utilitarian force, and so those modern social engineers setting the stage of the New World Order also knew that in this “End of History” age, a new religious system would be needed to keep the human cattle obedient and controllable.
This new religion of the New World Order would involve the generalized worship of Gaia… that same Earth Mother worship that shaped the cult systems of so much of the ancient world.
The only difference between this new Gaia Cult and the earlier Earth Mother cults of ancient Rome, Persia and Babylon, was that the 21st century variant would have a more “scientific” veneer and would be premised on terms like “reducing carbon footprints”, “sustainable development”, “adapting to carrying capacity” and “stopping global warming”.
The UN’s Millennial Development Goals, Agenda 21 (later renamed Agenda 2030) and The Earth Charter (all overseen by Maurice Strong, Steven Rockefeller and even Mikhail Gorbachev) did much to legitimize fringe pseudo-scientific Gaia concepts into international legal doctrines.
Strong was himself a devoted follower of the Gaia religion during his lifetime, and even called for creating a ‘World Gaia Day’ as an international holiday celebrating the inauguration of the UN’s Conference on Sustainable Development in 1992… which he also presided over.
Over the ensuing years, vast pressure was placed on nation states to castrate themselves on the altar of winning the war against Global Warming (soon to be renamed ‘Climate Change’).
Increasingly nation states were expected to act only in conformity with un-elected and often anonymous boards of IPCC ‘experts’ demanding drastic cuts to living standards in order to stop climate change.
Eco-Warrior Central Bankers such as Mark Carney, Mario Draghi and other anti-human technocrats began plans to rewire the entire world economy around a program of total depopulation centered around Green New Deals, and decarbonization- ignoring the fact that CO2 is plant food, and the carbon molecule is the driving force behind life on earth.[1]
Thankfully, in 2013, certain nations of Eurasia—most especially China and Russia—had enough. Although it took years of work, these two nations had gained sufficient strength to finally stand resolutely against the financier oligarchy controlling the City of London and Wall Street and asserted that they were not going to play the ‘New World Order’ depopulation game any longer.
As these nations began growing their influence through such new institutions as the BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organization and G20, they began working to assert their sovereign power to protect their people from the rapacious demands of the financier oligarchy on the one hand while laying out plans for the largest pro-industrial growth agenda ever before seen in world history.
This took the form of China’s Belt and Road Initiative, first announced in 2013, and which integrated into the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union and Polar Silk Road.
With this 2013 initiative, a new game was in town, which rejected depopulation, and which defended sovereign national power as a weapon to rein in the influence of fifth columnists (evidenced by Putin’s various clashes with Russian oligarchs and with China having cracked down on over 4.7 million corrupt CPC officials since Xi Jinping entered office).
In opposition to the closed system logic of the End of History Depopulation lobby, this new paradigm saw a program of Open System thinking emerge since 2013, which has been premised on the notion that cooperation, advanced industrial progress, and long term thinking are superior paths to security than periodically bombing nations back to the stone age.
We also began to see a restoration of sanity that challenged the 21st century Gaia cult that has sought to demonize carbon-using computer modelling for decades.
With the emergence of MAGA movement within the USA itself, a similar rejection of eco-genocide can be seen, which certainly offers hope that a coordinated alliance of like-minded nations may yet be able to break the controls of the depopulation lobby.
However, healing the wounds caused by several generations of brainwashing is not a simple matter. And the religious-like cults of modern Gaia worshippers represent a dangerous movement that will not easily give up on their obsession to save nature from humanity, and become useful members of the human speciess.
So, in order to appreciate this eco-movement and the danger it poses to freedom loving citizens everywhere, a little historical backstory is in order.
Where did it come from?
The current pressure to transform our entire world to the undisputed “reality” of man-made global warming finds its true origins in the Malthusian revival of 1968-1972.
In this short interval of time, a vacuum left by the elimination of pro-development leaders such as John F. Kennedy, Enrico Mattei, Charles de Gaulle, Martin Luther King and Bobby Kennedy was filled by establishment hacks and cowards. These tools ushered in a paradigm shift towards “conservationism,” and rejected the industrial growth ethic that defined western civilization up until that point.
This Malthusian Revival answered the challenge put forth by Eugenics Society president and UNESCO founder Julian Huxley.
Of course, just one year after the world had come to realize the horrors of Nazi eugenics, Huxley and his associates among the Anglo-American elite who financed Hitler had a big job to clean up the image of eugenics and re-package it under another name.
The Club of Rome and 1001 Nature Trust
In 1968, an organization was formed known as the Club of Rome, led by two misanthropes named Aurelio Peccei and OECD Director General for Scientific Affairs Sir Alexander King. It promulgated a new gospel to the world: the age of scientific progress and industrial growth must stop in order for the world to reset its values under a new paradigm of zero-technological growth.
Both Peccei and King were also advocates of a new pseudoscience dubbed “World Problematique,” which was developed in the early 1960s and can simply be described as “the science of global problems.” Unlike other branches of science, solving problems facing humanity was not the concern for followers of Problematique. Its adherents asserted that the future could be known by first analyzing the infinite array of “problems” which humanity creates in modifying the environment.
[…]
An adherent to Problematique would fixate on every “problem” caused by humans naively attempting to solve problems. They would note that every human intervention leads to dis-equilibrium, and thus unpredictability. The Problematique-oriented mind would conclude that if the “problem that causes all problems” were eliminated, then a clean, pre-determined world of perfect stasis, and thus predictability, would ensue.
Reporting on the growth of the Club of Rome’s World Problematique agenda in 1972, OECD Vice Chair, and Club of Rome member Hugo Thiemann told Europhysics News,
[…]
The organization quickly set up branches across the Anglo-Saxon world, with members ranging from select ideologues from the political, business, and scientific community who all agreed that society’s best form of governance was a scientific dictatorship.
Sir Alexander wrote:
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill….All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”
In order to finance this paradigm shift, the 1001 Trust was founded in 1970 by Prince Bernhardt of the Netherlands.
Bernhardt (card carrying Nazi and founder of the Bilderberger Group in 1954) had worked alongside his close misanthropic associates Prince Philip Mountbatten, and Sir Julian Huxley to create the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) just a few years earlier. The plan was simple: each of the 1001 founding members simply put $10,000 into the trust, which was then directed towards the green paradigm shift.
Other prominent 1001 Club members included international royalty, billionaires, and technocratic sociopaths who wanted nothing more than to manage this promised Brave New World as “alphas”. Many of these figures were also members of the Club of Rome, including Canada’s Maurice Strong, who later became Vice President of the WWF under Prince Philip’s presidency.
Strong had replaced another WWF Vice President by the name of Louis Mortimer Bloomfield. Bloomfield was another 1001 Club member whom New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison discovered to be at the heart of the Montreal-based assassination of the anti-Malthusian President John F. Kennedy in 1963.
The document that became the bible and blueprint of this new anti-humanist movement that birthed today’s Green New Deal agenda was titled Limits to Growth (1972) and today holds the record as the most widely read book on ecology, having sold 30 million copies published into 32 languages.
[…]
The book itself was the culmination of a two year study undertaken by a team of MIT statisticians under the nominal heading of Jay Forrester and Dennis Meadows. While Forrester died in 2016, Meadows is still alive, and recently shared his sick vision of a future where, at most, 1-2 billion people will be granted permission to exist by a ruling oligarchy.
[…]
Malthusianism in Brief
These Club of Rome/WWF/1001 Club members dubbed themselves “neo Malthusians,” referring to the ideology popularized by the British Empire’s Thomas Malthus.
Malthus’ 1799 Essay on the Principle of Population pessimistically noticed that human population grows geometrically while food production grows arithmetically, leading invariably to a crisis point of over-population. This crisis point creates a mathematical foundation for the concept that later came to be dubbed “carrying capacity” by the authors of Limits to Growth.
Of course, rather than permit those human cattle from developing their minds in order to make more discoveries and inventions, which would offset this crisis point, Malthus (and his heirs later) knew that the British Empire which employed him could never exist were that creative power unleashed. Instead, Malthus coldly advocated the elimination of the “unfit to make way for the more fit.”
[…]
By re-packaging Malthus’ assumptions into a more complex computing system, these neo-Malthusians wanted to create a shame based movement of willful self-annihilation among an entire generation of baby boomers.
Of course, if you assume that technological progress has ended, then it will certainly appear that a closed system of fixed limited resources can only be managed by a technocratic elite choosing who gets diminishing returns as the world settles into some imaginary “mathematical equilibrium” of sustainability.
[…]
Via https://matthewehret.substack.com/p/defeating-the-depopulation-agenda
The Most Revolutionary Act 