The Most Revolutionary Act

Uncensored updates on world events, economics, the environment and medicine

The Most Revolutionary Act

Kash Patel admits under oath FBI Buying Americans’ Data

Kash Patel | Unease at FBI as Kash Patel ousts top officials, move ...

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has started buying location data on Americans, Kash Patel, FBI director, said under oath at the Senate intelligence committee worldwide threats hearing on Wednesday.

Patel’s admission came in response to a question from the senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat who is a longtime opponent of the warrantless surveillance of Americans. Wyden told Patel that his predecessor, Christopher Wray, testified in 2023 that the FBI did not at that time purchase location data derived from internet advertising, although he acknowledged that it had done so in the past.

“Is that the case still?” Wyden asked. “And if so, can you commit this morning to not buying Americans’ location data?”

“We do purchase commercially available information that’s consistent with the constitution and the laws under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, and it has led to some valuable intelligence for us,” Patel responded.

“So you’re saying that the agency will buy Americans’ location data,” Wyden said. “I believe that that’s what you’ve said in kind of intelligence lingo. And I just want to say as we start this debate, doing that without a warrant is an outrageous end run around the fourth amendment. It’s particularly dangerous given the use of artificial intelligence to comb through massive amounts of private information.

“This is exhibit A for why Congress needs to pass our bipartisan, bicameral bill, the Government Surveillance Reform act,” Wyden said, referring to legislation he is working to pass to rein in surveillance.

While law enforcement must get a judge-authorized search warrant to obtain location data directly from telecom companies, government agencies have instead been able to buy such information from private data brokers.

Wyden’s questioning of Patel on this issue was amplified on social media by Warren Davidson, a House Republican who introduced a bill mirroring Wyden’s Senate measure with the Democratic representative Zoe Lofgren.

“This is a clear violation of the fourth amendment and is why I introduced the Government Surveillance Reform act,” Davidson observed, “to close the data broker loophole that allows intelligence agencies to buy Americans’ private data”.

The fourth amendment to the US constitution defines the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures” and specifies that “no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized”.

[…]

Via https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/18/kash-patel-fbi-location-data

Israeli settlements will spell ‘end’ for Holy Land Christians

Israeli settlements will spell ‘end’ for Holy Land Christians – ‘America First’

RT

Unabated settler violence, along with Israel’s continued settlement policy, could spell doom for the remaining Christian communities in the Holy Land, Jason Jones, founder of the Vulnerable People Project, has told RT’s America First.

Israel has allegedly approved the demolition of thousands of homes in the West Bank belonging to Christian communities and is encroaching on the territory of some of the oldest Christian populations in the area, particularly around Bethlehem, as well as villages such as Taybeh, Jones claimed.

The settlement of Shtema located at the site of a former Israel military base just east of the town of Bethlehem “will be the end of the Christian community in the Holy Land,” Jones said. “It will be the end of the oldest Christian community in the world,” he added, referring to a settlement legalized by West Jerusalem last year.

The NGO founder, whose organization operates in the West Bank and other territories, warned that local Christian communities are being attacked by settlers. “There is direct physical violence. There is separating the communities,” Jones added.

Neither West Jerusalem nor Washington is willing to act, with the US choosing to be “on the side of the oppressor,” Jones believes. Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, is “just ignoring it,” according to Jones. Huckabee, a former Baptist minister, “was not man enough to rise to the occasion and speak truth,” Jones said.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/635415-israel-settlements-end-christians/

Why is FBI investigating former counterterrorism chief who opposes US-Israeli war on Iran?

Joe Kent during his 2022congressional campaign in which Donald Trump endorsed his bid, helping him secure the Republican nomination

RT

Former head of the US National Counterterrorism Center Joe Kent, who resigned this week in protest over the US-Israeli war on Iran, is under FBI investigation, according to Semafor.

A probe into alleged improper sharing of classified information was opened before Kent quit his post and accused the Israeli government of manipulating intelligence to influence President Donald Trump’s decision to launch a bombing campaign aimed at toppling the Iranian government, the outlet’s sources claimed.

The report on Thursday coincided with efforts by Trump administration allies and pro-Israel commentators to portray Kent as a “known leaker” and a suspected anti-Semite.

Did Kent touch a political livewire?

Kent’s resignation letter blamed the consequences of the new Middle East conflict on Israel.

“Early in this administration, high-ranking Israeli officials and influential members of the American media deployed a misinformation campaign that wholly undermined your America First platform and sowed pro-war sentiments to encourage a war with Iran,” he wrote to Trump on Tuesday.

“This echo chamber was used to deceive you into believing that Iran posed an imminent threat to the United States, and that should you strike now, there was a clear path to a swift victory,” he added, suggesting Israel played a significant role in previous regional conflicts, including in Iraq and Syria.

Such accusations are uncommon in mainstream US political discourse, where they can prompt allegations of anti-Americanism and anti-Jewish bigotry – unlike criticisms of the country’s own leadership.

Over the years, Trump’s domestic critics have called him a “Russian puppet,” an insurrectionist, and a convicted felon who must be barred from a second term. Now, left-wing commentator Rachel Maddow claims the president attacked Iran after being corruptly influenced by Arab Gulf monarchies.

What are Kent’s national security credentials?

Kent is a military veteran who served 11 tours, mostly in Iraq, before becoming a CIA paramilitary officer. His first wife, Shannon, served in the US Army’s Intelligence Support Activity unit and was killed in a terrorist attack in Manbij, Syria, in 2019.

He has been a vocal supporter of Trump and his ‘Make America Great Again’ agenda. Before his appointment in the second Trump administration, he publicly opposed a potential US war with Iran, warning that while the US could inflict damage, such a conflict would weaken the country as it confronts China.?

Media reports have described Kent as an ally of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who has long opposed US military interventions and previously sold T-shirts with the slogan “No war with Iran.”

The DNI has said it is the president’s prerogative to interpret intelligence as he sees fit. Gabbard was reportedly sidelined within the administration, with her office informally referred to as “Do Not Invite,” according to Bloomberg.

How has Washington responded to Kent’s resignation?

Trump responded to Kent’s resignation by calling him “a nice guy” he did not know well, adding that he was “very weak on security” and that his departure was a positive development.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt rejected Kent’s claim that Iran posed no imminent threat to the US. “This is the same false claim that Democrats and some in the liberal media have been repeating over and over,” she wrote, adding that suggestions Trump acted under outside influence were “both insulting and laughable.”

Conversely, senior US officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, have said the timing of the US-Israeli attack was influenced by pressure from West Jerusalem. Israel reportedly warned it would act with or without US support. The administration has argued that participation allowed it to better protect US troops in the region from retaliation.

Ben Shapiro, a prominent pro-Israel commentator, claimed Kent “has been for a very long time conspiratorially minded in the extreme” and was promoting “bizarrely heterodox views.” He warned that “heretic MAGA” figures were targeting the presidency.

Shapiro also cited claims by far-right influencer Nick Fuentes that Kent had sought his support during a congressional campaign and expressed agreement with his views – an allegation Kent has disputed. Critics call Fuentes an open anti-Semite, so the implication of Shapiro’s message was clear.

Why does Kent’s resignation matter?

Kent said he remains committed to the ‘America First’ approach and urged Trump to make a course correction. His resignation reflects broader disagreements within Trump’s political base, as some people accuse the president of abandoning his campaign promises.

Trump said he is the one who decides what MAGA means and excluded Tucker Carlson from the movement because the talk show host opposes the war with Iran.

Kent had top-level access to classified intelligence that presumably informed the administration’s decisions and is the first senior official to publicly oppose the war with Iran.

The US government has a history of internal dissent over military interventions that often becomes public only through anonymous leaks or memoirs published years after the fact. Former Secretary of State Colin Powell, for example, argued against the 2003 Iraq invasion behind closed doors. But publicly he made the case for it at the United Nations, which he subsequently described as a “painful” episode and a “blot” on his record.

What does Kent believe Washington should do about Iran?

Kent discussed his resignation and views in an interview with Carlson.

“The main issue is how the Israelis are out of control and they are driving this entire war,” he said, adding that Trump has the leverage to make the necessary changes. He argued that US protection of Israel should not be unconditional. America’s message, Kent said, should be: “You are done going on the offense because this is our war. We’re paying for it. We’re bleeding for it. This is not your war.”

“If we don’t address our relationship with the Israelis, even if we come up with a temporary ceasefire, we’ll be right back in this same situation in very short order,” he warned.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/635535-kent-resignation-fbi-investigation/

 

Ukrainian mercenary activity in India ‘very disturbing

Ukrainian mercenary activity in India ‘very disturbing’ – ex-general
RT
New Delhi will not agree to Kiev’s request to release suspects detained by anti-terrorism forces, Shokin Chauhan has told RT India

Recently uncovered Ukrainian mercenary activity in India is “very disturbing,” a former paramilitary general has told RT India.

India’s anti-terrorism organization, the National Investigation Agency (NIA), last week arrested seven people, including six Ukrainians and a US citizen, for allegedly training and supplying weapons to insurgents in Myanmar. It said the men had crossed into India’s eastern neighbor and back through the state of Mizoram, which restricts the entry of non-Indian citizens.

The lack of Myanmar army personnel on the border with Mizoram facilitates significant movement of people, Lt. Gen. Shokin Chauhan, former director general of the Assam Rifles paramilitary force, told RT India.

“The Ukrainian Embassy has asked for their [arrested nationals] release,” he added. “But we are not going to give them up because it’s very, very clear that they entered this part of India illegally.”

Chauhan said the suspects will be charged for violating Indian laws.

He said the region around the India-Myanmar border is a hotbed of insurgent activity against the Myanmar Army.

Those arrested could have been in the region to train insurgents to fight the Myanmar Army, according to Chauhan.

“However, many of these insurgent groups are also helping out insurgent groups that are operating inside India,” he added, calling it “a very disturbing factor.”

The former paramilitary officer said it is not known how the mercenaries entered Mizoram as a special permit was required for foreigners to enter the region.

“The Indo-Myanmar border is 1,643 kilometers long… The lack of a continuous fence… that’s the issue with our northeastern borders,” he said. “A lot of people [are] trying to fish in troubled waters. And I’m not sure which foreign power is involved in it, if there’s a foreign power involved. I’m not sure which insurgent group is involved in it, but we will come to know. And we will have the capability to deal with this very soon.”

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/india/635520-ukrainian-mercenary-activity-in-india/

Here’s Exactly What China Will Do to Taiwan in the Next 90 Days

Iranian missiles pound Tel Aviv, fires engulf the city

👍 US-Israel-Iran war | @geopolitics_prime

Emergency crews rushed to contain fires across Tel Aviv after Iranian strikes, with footage showing burning vehicles and large blazes, SSN reported.

Reports also indicate a fire near Ben Gurion Airport following the strikes.

Via https://t.me/healthimpact/3284

Why Should We Care if Borrelia, The Agent of Lyme Disease, Was Bioengineered?

Mar 12, 2026

The theories have been swirling around medical chat rooms for decades. It started when I began my medical practice in 1987 after moving to Hyde Park, N.Y., which I didn’t know at the time, was one of the number one hot spots for Lyme in the United States. I remember hearing about Plum Island 40 years ago when I started seeing chronic Lyme disease patients. The primary theory was that it was no coincidence that the outbreak of Lyme disease took place in Lyme, Connecticut, right across from Plum Island where the government was doing experiments on ticks.

The reason these patients were so sick, according to the theories, was that the bacteria was bioengineered to be more potent. It certainly was possible, since governments around the world all have their secret bioweapons programs, but of course it was difficult to prove the theory beyond a reasonable doubt. And then there are of course conspiracists putting out far-reaching theories in different areas, like ‘we are not alone in the universe’… (of course, which we’re not!) …so we needed reasonable proof. The prevailing thinking on Plum Island was that Nazi scientists were recruited after WWII to work on ticks and weaponize them. Now more information is emerging on these theories. This past week two articles came out. One by Dr Robert Malone and the other by the Daily Mail.

For those not Lyme history buffs, part of the initial information on Plum Island came from the book by Michael Carrol, Lab 257, released back in August 2005.

Lab 257 Was Based On Declassified Government Documents

Lab 257 and the release of bioengineered ticks has been discussed in one form or another for over 20 years. I listened to the theories for decades, and ignored them for the most part, because Borrelia burgdorferi had been known to be around for over a million years. It was not a new bacteria. And even if the government had bioengineered it, what difference was it going to make in getting my patients better? (more about that in a bit). It’s not like I could call up the secret scientists and ask for the secret sauce, although an AI search on potential solutions was interesting, as I will discuss below.

Then came Kris Newby, who wrote the book Bitten: The Secret History of Lyme Disease and Biological Weapons

This was 14 years after Lab 257 was released. Some theories just won’t die!

Kris was senior producer of the documentary ‘Under Our Skin’ which I was in. She had strong scientific credentials. You can see the interview with Dana Parish back from several years ago, through Bay Area Lyme Foundation:

As per this interview from Kris and the BAL Ticktective Podcast:

In this interview, author/filmmaker, Kris Newby, explains the murky history behind the US government’s involvement with Lyme disease and continued efforts to hide how the military’s bioweapons programs caused the spread of tick-borne pathogens. She explains how alliances between pharmaceutical companies, insurance companies, university-based research teams, and the government led to inaccurate testing and denials of care, causing untold suffering to millions. Kris draws parallels between Long Covid and chronic Lyme and shines a light on how we are being dismissed, misinformed, and deliberately misled by the very institutions that should be protecting us.”

https://www.bayarealyme.org/tag/bitten-the-secret-history-of-lyme-disease-and-biological-weapons/

The Theories of Bioengineered Ticks Resurfaced Over A Decade Later

Bitten by Kris Newby was the second book to receive a lot of attention, discussing the above research on Plum Island and why it was done. Some patient advocates and doctors firmly believed that the Plum Island experiments were the reason Lyme was so controversial. After all, if the government accidentally (or not so accidentally) released ticks or bioengineered them, and then it was making tens of thousands of people sick (the numbers kept getting bigger year after year) that could explain why the government kept covering up the inaccuracy of testing; attacking doctors who were trying to find answers, backing IDSA researchers who claimed it was no more than an ‘autoimmune phenomenon’ vs ‘a persistent infection’ (hey, we didn’t do anything to the ticks to make them more potent biological weapons and resistant to standard therapies), not to mention the governments continued focus on finding a vaccine.

If they caused part of the problem, they would want a vaccine to protect people, right? Perhaps that is why they kept focusing on that aspect of the equation?

Did Financial Gains in Vaccines Obfuscate ‘Gain of Function’ Research?

Unfortunately, the argument that we are creating a vaccine to protect people gets mired in whether you caused the problem in the first place, and of course, financial collaborations. The patents for the LYMErix vaccine were primarily held through a collaborative arrangement between SmithKline Beecham (now GlaxoSmithKline [GSK]) and Yale University (who also received a lot of government grant money to study ticks), as well as the CDC. SmithKline and the CDC reportedly filed a joint patent application related to Lyme disease diagnostics and components.

The NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) also funded basic research grants which provided the foundational patents for cloning the genes used to create the vaccine. Let’s be clear. I have nothing against vaccines that save lives as I use them all the time; but when you remove the 31 (OspA) an 34 (OspB) bands from the Lyme diagnostic criteria at the Dearborn conference in 1994 because they were antigens used in the vaccine (their presence could indicate either infection or vaccination confusing the situation) and never put these Lyme-specific bands back in your official two-tiered testing years later, once the vaccine was off the market, when they could improve diagnostics for sick patients, that is just plain wrong. Your job as the top health related organizations in our country is to protect and save lives. Not obfuscate.

Now comes the third act of this long-running play. An article released last week by Dr Robert Malone by Trial Site News discusses once more ‘declassified documents’ linking the Lyme outbreak to a US bioweapons program. See below:

Declassified Documents Link U.S. Bioweapons Program to Lyme Disease Outbreak

Who is Dr Malone, who wrote this recent article, and why should we care about the extensive AI search he did? As of early 2026, Dr. Robert Malone serves as a member of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), a key federal vaccine panel within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). He was appointed to this position in June 2025 by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who was appointed as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). For those of you following the news, Secretary Kennedy has vowed to stop ‘gaslighting Lyme patients’ and get to the truth behind the present epidemic. That means the scientist writing this article has the support of the present HHS Secretary of Health, who himself has admitted that he has had chronic Lyme disease. Secretary Kennedy has stated on multiple occasions that it is “highly likely” that Lyme disease was developed as a military bioweapon.

[…]

Via https://medicaldetective.substack.com/p/why-should-we-care-if-borrelia-the-agent-of-lyme-disease-was-bioengineered

Ali Larijani—Killing the Off-Ramp

Kevork Almassian

When Israel announced that Ali Larijani had been “eliminated,” the Zionist commentariat tried to frame it the way it frames every assassination in this war: a clean tactical success, a “decapitation” of the enemy, a surgical move that supposedly brings “peace” closer.

But Larijani was not a battlefield commander. He was, in many ways, the opposite of what the war-hungry camp wants to see alive inside Iran: a balancing force, a pragmatist with institutional weight, and a man associated with diplomacy, especially the kind of diplomacy that could provide Trump with an exit ramp.

That is why he was targeted. Because in a war increasingly decided by escalation dynamics and economic blowback, Larijani represented the political capacity to craft a post-war settlement if and when Tehran decided it was ready to end the confrontation, and if and when Trump reached the conviction that he could no longer bear the historical economic repercussions.

In other words, if you want to prevent de-escalation, you hit the people who can negotiate.

Who was Ali Larijani and why he mattered

Larijani represented a pillar of institutional continuity, a bridge between security and politics, and a recognizable figure for any serious backchannel or settlement logic. Larijani was the secretary of the Supreme National Security Council. The kind of role that matters in war termination: the state’s political brain, not only its military muscle.

Two days before his assassination, Larijani addressed the Islamic world with a structured statement directed to Muslim-majority governments, calling them out, morally, politically and religiously, for their silence and complicity while Iran was being attacked.

He framed the war as a “deceptive American-Zionist aggression” launched during negotiations, aimed at dismantling Iran, and he pointed to the fact that the assault had already produced “martyrdom” at the top of the Iranian leadership and among civilians and commanders, yet was met with Iranian national and Islamic resistance.

He then delivered the line that should embarrass every Arab capital: aside from rare exceptions and mostly symbolic statements, Islamic states failed to stand with Iran, even as Iran—by his description—pushed the aggressor into an impasse.

And then, in a religious register that many Gulf monarchies understand all too well (or not?), he invoked a saying attributed to the Prophet Muhammad—arguing that whoever hears a Muslim calling for help and does not respond is not truly part of the community—before asking, rhetorically, what kind of Islam this is.

Deepfakes, Silence, and Strategy: How Netanyahu’s Absence Sparked Media Crisis

Benjamin Netanyahu

pravda.ru

Speculation surrounding the alleged disappearance of Benjamin Netanyahu has gone beyond mere rumor, becoming part of a broader information confrontation between Israel and Iran. The absence of clear, verifiable public appearances by the Israeli prime minister has created a vacuum quickly filled by competing narratives and digital content of questionable authenticity.

Digital Doubles and the Crisis of Trust

Attempts by Israeli sources to demonstrate that Netanyahu remains active have sparked debate online. Some commentators and bloggers have pointed to visual inconsistencies in circulated videos, suggesting possible digital manipulation. These claims, however, remain unverified and should be treated with caution.

At the same time, limited official communication has contributed to speculation. In highly sensitive security environments, reduced public visibility of political leaders is not unusual, but in the current media landscape it often leads to mistrust and competing interpretations.

“Information noise around Netanyahu reflects a classic demoralization strategy, where even minor technical inconsistencies are amplified into claims of dramatic events,”

said political analyst Mikhail Egorov in comments to Pravda.Ru.

How Iran Shapes the Narrative

Iranian media and commentators have focused on raising questions rather than making direct claims, highlighting the lack of consistent imagery and communication from the Israeli leadership. This approach allows them to influence the narrative without issuing statements that could be easily disproven.

[…]

Via https://english.pravda.ru/world/166217-netanyahu-disappearance-information-war-israel-iran/

USS Gerald R Ford Sailors Suspected of Setting Fire to Avoid Continuing Deployment

USS Gerald R. Ford
USS Gerald R. Ford diverted to Crete after laundry‑space fire — 30‑hour blaze sparks investigation into deliberate crew sabotage. Seaman Mark Rundio/WikiMedia Commons

 

Bernadette Tixon

The US Navy is investigating whether sailors aboard the USS Gerald R. Ford deliberately started the fire that tore through the aircraft carrier’s main laundry spaces on 12 March — a blaze that took more than 30 hours to extinguish and left over 600 crew members without proper sleeping quarters. The carrier, the most expensive warship ever built, is now diverting to Souda Naval Base in Crete for repairs and a formal investigation into the incident, according to sources with direct knowledge of the planned port call.

The investigation explicitly includes the possibility of deliberate sabotage by crew members, with one theory suggesting the fire was intentionally set to interrupt the carrier’s lengthy and repeatedly extended mission. The Ford has now entered its tenth month of deployment, with crew members told their assignment will likely stretch into May — twice the length of a normal aircraft carrier deployment.

Extended. Then Extended Again.

The USS Gerald R. Ford departed Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, on 24 June 2025 for what was initially a routine deployment to the US European Command area. What followed was a sequence of mission redirections that progressively pushed the crew further from home. It was subsequently redirected to the US Southern Command area for counter-narcotics operations before being extended again and sent to the Middle East ahead of the start of hostilities with Iran.

‘That extension will ultimately be about an 11-month deployment, so there will be an impact on her return and the schedule for her maintenance availability so she’s ready to go again,’ Vice Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jim Kilby told lawmakers on the Senate Armed Services Committee. Should the Ford remain deployed until mid-April, it will break the post-Vietnam War record of 294 days set by USS Abraham Lincoln in 2020. An extension into May would see it rival deployment lengths not recorded since the Vietnam War era itself.

Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Daryl Caudle said in a statement: ‘Our sailors understand the importance of their service. They are away from home longer than planned because the nation needs them forward and ready.’ Those words have done little to ease the strain felt aboard a vessel that has been at sea, under fire, and under pressure for the better part of a year.

A Ship Under Strain

In October, the carrier and its 4,500 sailors and pilots were stationed in the Mediterranean when Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered it to shift course to the Caribbean, bolstering President Trump’s pressure campaign against Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro. From there, the ship was quickly redirected to the Middle East, where it joined the US-Israeli war against Iran, now entering its third week.

The fire broke out in the ship’s main laundry area and spread rapidly through the ventilation system. It took more than 30 hours to extinguish, damaging sleeping quarters so severely that crew members have been forced to sleep on floors and tables. US Central Command confirmed in a statement that ‘the cause of the fire was not combat-related and is contained. There is no damage to the ship’s propulsion plant, and the aircraft carrier remains fully operational.’

The Ford had also been plagued by plumbing issues, with its vacuum collection system malfunctioning and maintenance calls related to sewage issues logged at a rate of nearly one per day.

The Sabotage Theory

Iran’s state broadcaster, citing a source in the central headquarters of the Iranian Armed Forces, reported that the fire may have been deliberately started by American servicemen who did not want to continue participating in military operations against Iran. While Iranian state media claims should be treated with caution, Western reporting has since confirmed that the possibility of deliberate sabotage is being formally investigated by the US Navy, independent of any Iranian framing of events.

The broader context lends weight to why the theory is being taken seriously. ‘Fatigue accumulates and time away from home weighs on sailors,’ Rear Adm Paul Lanzilotta said in a statement. ‘Our responsibility as leaders is to ensure they are supported — with reliable shipboard services, clear communication, and consistent engagement.’ Whether that support proved sufficient for all 4,500 crew members now appears to be a question for investigators.

If confirmed, the sabotage claim would represent one of the most serious internal discipline events in the modern US Navy — raising fundamental questions about the institutional limits of extended combat deployments and the human cost of mission creep on crews who were never told how long they would be gone. The Ford’s diversion to Crete and the formal opening of a sabotage investigation signals that those questions can no longer be deferred.

[…]

Via https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/us-navy-investigates-sabotage-uss-gerald-r-ford-fire-1786273