Trump Vows To Ban WEF Rollout of CBDCs: “They Are a Threat to Our Liberty”

President Donald Trump has vowed to make the WEF’s CBDC system illegal in America if he wins the election this November.

Sean Adl-Tabatabai

In a new speech at the Bitcoin 2024 conference in Nashville Trump made his stance on the WEF’s plans for a centralized digital currency clear: “There will never be a CBDC while I am president.”

Reclaimthenet.org reports: This statement echoes his previous comments on the matter, where he has consistently expressed strong opposition to the idea of a CBDC. He believes that such a currency would give the government too much control over people’s money and could potentially lead to financial tyranny.

Trump’s views on CBDCs seem to be part of a broader narrative that he’s building around protecting individual freedoms and liberties. It’s a message that resonates with many in the cryptocurrency community, who see digital currencies as a way to decentralize power and reduce government control.

Trump has previously called CBDCs a “dangerous threat to freedom.”

Trump’s firm stance underscores the escalating discussions surrounding CBDCs, a significant matter among global governmental bodies. To date, only a few countries have officially adopted such currencies. However, the digital currency landscape continues to evolve, with China advancing the implementation of its digital yuan, India progressing towards a digital rupee, and the European Central Bank initiating a preparatory phase for a potential digital euro.

CBDCs represent a significant evolution in the architecture of money. These digital forms of fiat currency, issued and regulated by a country’s central bank, promise enhanced efficiency in transactions and greater financial inclusion. However, they also pose potential risks to civil liberties that merit careful consideration. Here are some of the primary concerns:

1. Privacy

CBDCs could fundamentally alter the landscape of financial privacy. Traditional cash transactions allow for anonymity. With CBDCs, even small transactions might be traceable and recordable by the central bank. This could lead to a scenario where governments have access to detailed records of every individual’s financial life, raising significant privacy concerns unless robust safeguards are implemented.

2. Surveillance

The transition to a fully digital currency could potentially give governments unprecedented capabilities to monitor and surveil citizen behaviors. In regimes with weaker protections for civil liberties, this could be exploited to track political dissent or suppress opposition. The potential for surveillance not only impacts privacy but also freedom of expression and association.

3. Financial Censorship

With the centralization of currency issuance and transaction management, a CBDC could make it easier for governments to implement financial sanctions against individuals or groups without due process. Accounts could be frozen or transactions blocked more efficiently, which could be used as a tool for political repression or social control.

4. Exclusion

Despite the potential for greater financial inclusion, the reliance on digital infrastructure might marginalize those without access to technology or reliable internet, such as rural populations or the economically disadvantaged. This could exacerbate existing inequalities and restrict access to essential services for those on the fringes of the digital economy.

5. Cybersecurity Risks

The concentration of financial data in a central digital system increases the risk of systemic failures due to cyberattacks. A successful attack could compromise the integrity of a nation’s entire financial system. Moreover, the implications of such attacks extend beyond economic damage to potentially crippling impacts on individual financial security and privacy.

6. Centralization of Power

CBDCs concentrate monetary control significantly. This centralization of financial power could reduce the checks and balances provided by a more distributed banking system, increasing the potential for abuse by those in power, particularly in undemocratic regimes.

7. Legal and Ethical Implications

The implementation of CBDCs raises several legal and ethical questions, including the scope of government intervention in personal finances, the rights of individuals under a digital currency system, and the balance between national security and personal freedoms.

[…]

Via https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/trump-vows-to-ban-wef-rollout-of-cbdcs-they-are-a-threat-to-our-liberty/

15 thoughts on “Trump Vows To Ban WEF Rollout of CBDCs: “They Are a Threat to Our Liberty”

  1. Yes and in addition, there is at least one other critical issue:

    With the “green” agenda, the electicity supply will be unreliable and worse. When the digital currency being the only legal tender, there is no way to buy anything, when power cuts occure. We have already seen this happen locally during short periods and no extreme disaster, as it has still been possible to buy stuff with regular bills and coins.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Unfortunately it’s too late for the US to buy gold and silver, Katherine. The US presently owes more than $35 trillion in debt – more than $100,000 for every man, woman and child. It’s GDP is only $25 billion.

    Like

      • That’s interesting concidering that both Russia and China has been “hording” both gold and silver for a number of years and kept it within their borders respectively. I suspect they realized what was going to happen in the greedy West …

        Liked by 1 person

      • The gold from the Russian Empire ended up in New York and London after the Bolshevik revolution. The city of London central bank and Wall Street financed the Communist takeover. The Revolutionaries were still in debt after turning over the gold which created the Holodomor as all grain and other crops were sent to the West as further repayment.

        Liked by 1 person

        • This corroborates what I’ve read in other sources. Somethi g about how Lenin and Trotsky were in the US and supplied with gold to smuggle to Russia for fostering the Revolution. The ruling family, the Romanovs, were slaughtered, and the Bolsheviks took over.

          Like

        • Not completly. Lots of it and money from Russiaan bank robberies ended up in the hands of the Swedish banker Olof Ashberg (Ash) in Stockholm. The grandson Robert is today still living on the profit made from it. Both was/is well known Bolsjeviks.

          Like

  3. Pingback: Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) Projects Foundering in Five-Eye Nations | Worldtruth

  4. Pingback: The Stablecoin Trap: Back Door to Total Financial Control | Worldtruth

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.