By Ben Bartlee
As far as I am concerned, there are two options here, each of which is equally plausible:
- The Karamel-uh entity overheard the true impetus of the Climate Change™ hoax at some point and didn’t realize or forgot that she’s not supposed to say the quiet part out loud
- The social engineers are simply getting more brazen in their declaration of intentions, and so these comments were intentionally inserted into the Karamel-uh entity’s speech — later to dismiss it as a “gaffe” — to move the Overton window in the direction of global genocide
Either way, these words escaping the lips of a possible future president (and maybe sooner that we realize if the MIA Brandon entity never resurfaces and is declared dead from COVID or domestic terrorism or whatever) should be front page news everywhere.
What explanation I don’t buy is the framing by the White House, relayed via the New York Post uncritically, that this was a “gaffe.”
Via New York Post (emphasis added)
“Vice President Kamala Harris on Friday called on the US to ‘reduce population’ in an effort to combat climate change, but she meant to say ‘reduce pollution,’ according to the White House.
The shocking gaffe happened as the 58-year-old vice president delivered remarks at Coppin State University in Baltimore, Md., on the need to build a ‘clean energy economy.’
‘When we invest in clean energy and electric vehicles and reduce population, more of our children can breathe clean air and drink clean water,’ Harris said, eliciting applause from the audience.
The official White House transcript of her speech acknowledges and corrects Harris’ disquieting error.*
In the transcript, ‘population’ is crossed out and ‘pollution’ is added in brackets to denote what the VP intended to say.”
*This is gaslighting nonsense; shame on the New York Post for printing it. Transcripts are supposed to reflect what was actually said, not edited later on to say whatever the governing authorities would like them to say.
She declares depopulation as the agenda clear as day in the video below:
[…]
Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/kamala-promotes-depopulation-climate-change/5863560
The Most Revolutionary Act 
Quickly, before Google jumps in again to block my response . . . Kamala Harris is skating on thin ice. The US population is already getting older and dying off. The polar axis is shifting, and the whole world is experiencing climactic changes that may or may not relate to human fiddling. She could help by getting real and telling us what she can do to solve even one of the problems facing the country.
LikeLike
Kamala should be an example of what she proposes!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kamala doesn’t seem to stand for anything. My blog friends have dubbed her with various names, including Cackles, Cameltoes, and other nicknames.
LikeLike
My thoughts exactly, papasha408. Who exactly does she plan to dispose of first?
LikeLike
The World Economic Forum (of which Kamala is definitely an adherent) has already been quite open about reducing global population (mainly by preventing poor and brown-skinned people from breeding).
LikeLiked by 1 person
All the futuristic idealogies extolled in such works as H. G. Wells’ “The Time Machine”, or Ayn Rand’s “Atlas Shrugged”, anticipate perfect societies run by intellectuals or the elite, but they minimize the importance of those who actually perform the labor. In “The Time Machine”, the above-ground people, are depicted as soft, chronically afraid, and pampered. Turns out they are afraid of the people in the underground sewer and public works sector, who raid at night. In “Atlas Shrugged” the intellectuals retire to a secret getaway in the mountains, where everything runs smoothly, but there is no mention of those who built and maintain the enclave. Who changes the light bulbs, after all?
I haven’t read these books lately, and may have forgotten details, but my overriding impression was that they neglect the labors of those who built the origional structures. Same with Orwell’s “1984”.
LikeLike
According to Canadian historian Matthew Ehret, H.G. Wells was part of a eugenics cult along with the Huxley family, Bertrand Russell, Orwell and other early British Fabians and his fiction was deliberate “predictive programming,” a type of brainwashing designed to make accepting of future events. See https://u.osu.edu/vanzandt/2018/04/18/predictive-programming/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Why do I find that so easy to believe?
LikeLike
That’s why I don’t try to make predictions. It’s hard to predict or to plan anything, since circumstances change moment to moment. Studying astrology was a trap that way, because there is a strong urge for predictions in astrologers and recipients.To recog ize patterns of energy is more consistent with Oriental philosophy and wholistic thinking: Everything is connected with everything else.
LikeLike
I just read your link. I can only say that David Icke or Alex Jones can be far fetched, but they look into situations nobody else thinks about. I’m not avidly for or against either one, but I like to know what drives them. I don’t think anyone can convey the whole picture, but that’s what keeps things interesting.
LikeLike
See my old article from 2020 on these questions:
https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2020/04/22/an-existential-question-and-two-very-different-answers-eine-existentielle-frage-und-zwei-sehr-verschiedene-antworten/http://tinyurl.com/le2hlpx
Cordial weekend regards
Andreas
LikeLike
Thanks for the link, Schluter.
LikeLike
Pingback: Sowing GMO Seeds of Depopulation | Worldtruth