The leadership of the NZMH chose to look the other way when their own employee notified them of a serious safety issue. Instead of doing their duty to investigate his allegations, they decided to besmirch him instead. They should be charged with criminal negligence.
Steve Kirsch
Executive summary
Earlier this week, a courageous whistleblower sent an email to the New Zealand Ministry of Health (NZMH) officials notifying them that the data that they have in their possession can only be explained if the COVID vaccines are killing thousands of New Zealanders.
The NZMH authorities didn’t publish a cohort time-series analysis to confirm or deny the leaker’s accusation. They did no analysis whatsoever on their own data.
Instead, the officials resorted to ad hominem attacks on the leaker to besmirch him and try to distract the public.
The NZMH has a duty to investigate the leaker’s allegations by doing a simple analysis that anyone can do. It takes about 15 minutes of effort. I know that because I’ve done it myself on the NZMH data. It shows the vaccines should be immediately stopped. The NZMH officials chose not to spend the 15 minutes and not to look. There’s a term for that; it’s called criminal negligence.
They’ve been notified of a serious problem and they chose to look the other way. It’s time for criminal charges to be brought the leadership.
You don’t have to take my word for it. You can now download the NZMH data and verify this for yourself.
See Data from US Medicare and the New Zealand Ministry of Health shows, beyond any doubt, that the COVID vaccines have killed millions for details.
The New Zealand mainstream media is asleep at the wheel. They are simply parroting whatever the NZMH officials say and not asking any questions.
Here are two articles from the New Zealand press showing that instead of showing the definitive time-series cohort analysis data, the NZMH officials simply claimed that the leaker was a spreader of misinformation and the press eats it up without asking any questions!!! What ever happened to investigative journalism?
and
The leaker’s data has been validated by two of the world’s most highly respected experts on data, risk, and epidemiology
See the slide deck, slides 85 and 86 for what they said. They basically said that this data removes all doubt about the vaccines killing massive numbers of people.
The cohort time series analysis is trivial to do. It shows the COVID vaccines killed on average 1 person per 1,000 shots
I did the analysis on the New Zealand data. It’s crystal clear that the shots are kill shots for anyone with a modicum of skill in the field.
If you don’t have the skills you can acquire them within minutes from my slide deck.
So on average 1 death per 1,000 doses. There were 12M doses given in New Zealand. So that’s an estimated excess death of 12,000 people in New Zealand.
So now we finally know what caused over 10,000 excess deaths in New Zealand since the shots rolled out, don’t we? Mystery solved!
Why isn’t the New Zealand mainstream media demanding to see the cohort time-series analysis from the NZMH?
The New Zealand press should be asking the NZMH for the cohort time-series analysis so they can do their own independent analysis of the data and determine whether the NZMH was telling the truth or not.
Instead, the New Zealand press simply accepts ad hominem attacks with no data.
Impressive!
The NZMH should be opening an investigation, but not into the leaker. They should be doing an internal investigation as to how they screwed up so badly and missed this HUGE HUGE safety signal.
The leaker is a hero. The villain in this story is how the NZMH epidemiologists were all asleep at the wheel and not looking at the data. Those epidemiologists have blood on their hands for refusing to look at the data.
They can’t lie about the data anymore. We know exactly what it says.
The epidemiologists at the NZMH have blood on their hands for not reporting this.
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/its-time-for-criminal-charges-to
The Most Revolutionary Act 
News reporting has become a citing of statistics, without any explanation of how those numbers affect real outcomes. Are criminal charges in order, and if so, against whom or what? And will a conviction of malfeasance and jail time do anyone any good?
A virus as vague as coronavirus, like the common cold, has no specific symptoms. I have doubts that any vaccine protects against the targeted illness, even though I was subjected to the ones required in US public schools, or before, by pediatricians following standards of care at the time.
Anecdotal evidence is not proof. Who is guilty when mass confusion rules the day?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kirsch is quite vague – perhaps because he’s American and doesn’t fully understand the NZ parliamentary system. In New Zealand, ordinary citizens have the ability to file a private prosecution (providing they cover the costs) against government miscreants. I suspect this is the only way criminal prosecution will happen against members of the former Labour government who are clearly guilty of fraud and manslaughter – if not deliberate murder.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Everyone is guilty who was in on this Covid-19 fraud. Everyone who injected someone with a bioweapon that they claim was a ‘vaccine’ is guilty. Unfortunately, the guilty parties will most likely not be held accountable, and they also cannot bring the dead back to life, whom they murdered.
However, with that being said, sue the bastards for everything you could get for yourself, if you sustained damages to your person as a result of having lined up and taken a bioweapon posing as a ‘vaccine’, and for those who were family members and who died after having been injected with those Covid-19 bioweapons!!
LikeLike
Great advice, Shelby.
LikeLiked by 1 person