By
In under a year, more than 500,000 post-COVID vaccine injuries have been reported to VAERS — nearly a third of all reports accumulated over the system’s entire three-decade lifespan — yet regulatory agencies remain silent.
As this expert stated, “Deploying any new vaccine based on data from expedited clinical trials into a population without a functioning safety monitoring system in place is reckless and irresponsible given the tools that are available.”
Moreover, she added, any investments needed to beef up safety monitoring would be “inexpensive in comparison” to the massive funding allocated to COVID-19 vaccine development and scale-up.
In theory, the U.S. has had a national vaccine safety monitoring system in place since 1990 — the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) — intended to function as an “early warning system.”
VAERS and its U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) counterpart FAERS (FDA Adverse Event Reporting System) constitute the principal data sources that regulators rely on when pulling drugs or vaccines from the market for safety reasons.
Not only has VAERS never lived up to its promise, but there can be little doubt its glaring failures are largely, and malignantly, by design.
For example, when a government-commissioned study highlighted VAERS inadequacies in 2010 — estimating more than 99% of vaccine adverse reactions were going unreported and that one of every 39 doses of vaccine administered was linked to adverse events corroborated in vaccine package inserts — the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) simply shut the project down.
Now, in less than a year, more than half a million reports of injuries have flooded into VAERS following experimental COVID jabs, including thousands of deaths. Yet a deafening regulatory silence has greeted this record-setting volume of adverse reactions, which accounts for nearly a third of all reports accumulated by VAERS over its entire three-decade lifespan.
How is the absence of “early warning system” alarm bells possible? In a recent commentary, “Defining Away Vaccine Safety Signals,” an experienced statistician suggested not only have safety experts’ admonitions to get COVID vaccine safety monitoring “right” not been heeded, but CDC and other public health agencies have taken steps to intentionally hide safety signals.
[…]
With injuries from COVID vaccines occurring on an unprecedented scale — and credible doctors and scientists issuing urgent warnings about short-term and longer-term damage — it may become increasingly difficult for the vaccine establishment to shove its problems under the statistical carpet.
In 1976, public health authorities were forced to halt their rollout of a rapidly mobilized swine flu vaccine, after a spate of negative publicity and some 4,000 serious adverse events — including Guillain-Barré syndrome and death — became impossible to ignore. This “medical debacle,” now widely acknowledged as such, became the focus of a 1979 episode of 60 Minutes.
With more than half a million COVID vaccine injuries now reported to VAERS alone, and many more reported around the world, current events dwarf the 1976 “debacle.”
[…]
The Most Revolutionary Act 
Pingback: We’ve Never Seen Vaccine Injuries on This Scale — Why Are Regulatory Agencies Hiding COVID Vaccine Safety Signals? — The Most Revolutionary Act | Aisle C
It’s fitting this should be the last article I view here. Perhaps CHD should discuss the Vaccine Safety Database [VSD] instead. But they won’t because that where all the real numbers of vaccine-injured are recorded and what types of injuries they have.
The VSD is immune to any FOIA requests because of the way it is set up.
So what are the real numbers incurred since 1971? CHD won’t discuss them either because they don’t cover back that far. They allege most injuries started in 1988, but they really started in 1971. My oldest was in 1974. My youngest was 1977.
LikeLike
“A vaccine that is not sterilizing permits the virus to infect you and replicate and as a result you can infect others. Technically it is not a vaccine at all (which by definition prevents infection); it is a prophylactic therapy.”
I copied, the above from here:
Dear Stuart, can you explain this, please?
LikeLike
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/vaccines-need-not-completely-stop-covid-transmission-to-curb-the-pandemic1/
Here in this article it is said for instance that sterilizing immunity was a key factor in eliminating smallpox.
LikeLike
Oh well—sorry, but I was alive back then. It was not polio but DDT poisoning.
Polio was a complete lie according to my own experiences and research. I do have an article on it with all the old videos telling us how wonderful DDT was.
Hey—there was even a DDT cartoon they showed on television for us young’ins
I certainly wouldn’t believe a word of those two journals mention here.
LikeLike
In addition, I would never trust anything in a syringe or in any pharmaceutical product these days.
I was almost dead by January 2018 when I stopped all pharma products primarily because I thought it was a waste of money for a dead person to take them. Okay—so I wasn’t dead yet—but I thought it was a waste anyway.
Damned if I didn’t recover and start investigating. My dying kidneys thrived, my vision returned and much more. I was an investigative journalist back in the day. What I learned was shocking.
Don’t tell me the vaccinated can’t be infected by the vaccinated because it happened to me 3 times in 3 years. Those papers lie.
LikeLike
Hi Joyce!
Thank you for all of your good info. As a retiree, I spend virtually every waking moment fighting this covid/quackcine mandate bullshit, via letters and phone calls to politicians and weatlh…er, I mean, health officials, protests, etc.
In any case, I was especially interested in your comment about having been — and perhaps still being, albeit perhaps in a slightly less ‘official’ capacity — an investigative journalist.
Here’s a News Flash (perhaps best described as the biggest-ever Elephant In The Room) that nobody wants to touch…certainly nobody in the lame$tream media: To the extent that any of the covid numbers can be trusted, BIG TOBACCO/BIG NICOTINE has — globally…and over the exact same period of time of the covid plandemic — killed more than 2 1/2 times as many people as covid. For Canada, the ratio is very similar but, for British Columbia (my home province), the ratio is nearly 5 to 1. That’s right: As of today (November 25, 2021) — and since March 11, 2020 (the day the WHO declared covid a “pandemic”) — covid has killed 2,313 British Columbians, while BT/BN has killed 10,238.
To those who tell me I can’t compare covid to BT/BN (“That’s apples and oranges”, blah, blah, blah), I say covid has been compared to every other major killer of people under the sun: World Wars I and II, Korea, Vietnam, 9/11, traffic accidents, AIDS, homicide, suicide, the illegal drug “crisis”, etc., etc., etc. Again, covid has been compared to every major killer of people on the planet…EXCEPT BIG TOBACCO/BIG NICOTINE…all of which prompts me to ask this question:
IF (and that’s a huge IF) the WHO, CDC, FDA, Health Canada, Crime Mini$ter Turdeau, Too Clo$e, Tampon, Horganized Crime, Dicks, Bull$hit Bonnie — and all of their global counterparts — truly cared about “public health and safety”, they would’ve much more aggressively tackled the REAL pandemic, BT/BN, over the last several decades. Instead, they’ve done virtually nothing…throwing us a bone (one piece of lame legislation or another) once in a while to relieve the pressure from us anti-tobacco activists. And tobacco has actually been declared “e$$ential” in some jurisdictions during the plandemic! BT/BN kills more people EVERY 3 1/2 HOURS than were killed in all of the 9/11 attacks! Sort of makes you wonder who the REAL terrorists are, doesn’t it?
If you or any of your investigative journalist colleagues would like to pursue this matter at all, I’m very happy to go public with it. I have no interest whatsoever in covering my face, having my voice altered, hiding my name, etc….and I have zero interest in making any money from it. I simply want an opportunity to state, publicly and on the record, that covid is a scam…and that, notwithstanding all of the other very solid evidence to back that up, the preceding paragraph makes it abundantly clear that all of the covid/quackcine mandate bull$hit is…well…BULL $HIT!
Please contact me directly: Errol E. Povah (Errol Peters on facebook) 778 899-4832 errolp@hotmail.com http://www.airspace.bc.ca http://www.tobaccofreeworld.ca
For the record, I’m NOT an anti-smoker. That term falsely suggests that I dislike or hate smokers…and that is NOT the case at all. It’s the industry — and tobacco/nicotine executives — that I absolutely despise.
And finally, to those who might still think it’s not ‘fair’ to compare covid to BT/BN, let me assure you that BIG TOBACCO/BIG NICOTINE and Big Pharma are in cahoots, bit time! Here’s just one small example: https://exposetobacco.org/resource/tobacco-and-pharma/
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Deploying any new vaccine based on data from expedited clinical trials into a population without a functioning safety monitoring” – “500,000 post-COVID vaccine injuries have been reported to VAERS” – well, which is it? VAERS is working or it’s not working? If you actually read those in the raw data you would find most of those thousands are fever or other of the listed side effects, temporarily. But if you don’t believe it you can read the raw data and not listen to an admittedly antivaccine site complaining of a surge of reports after HALF or more of the population gets a new vaccine. https://github.com/programmin1/VAERSReader
LikeLike
What they mean by sterilizing in reference to a vaccine means that the vaccine prevents you from getting infected and transmitting the illness. There is a dispute in the medical community whether the vaccine or improved nutrition eliminated smallpox. Here’s an excellent presentation by Dr Suzanne Humphries about the history of smallpox vaccine: https://stuartbramhall.wordpress.com/2017/09/28/the-ugly-history-of-smallpox-vaccine/
LikeLike
And I’m working up another article. Obama [who I voted for twice] changed the FOIA criteria. In matters of National Security, documents can be denied or even be denied to exist. They have now declared Public Health to be a National Security issue, so good luck getting any data at all.
So maybe they never lost that data they say they lost after all.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Independent Citizens.
LikeLike