Even if one does not experience adverse effects or only has mild symptoms after being injected, there is no data available whatsoever that can predict what the long-term effects from these experimental gene-therapies masquerading as vaccines will be.
Activist Post
By Jesse Smith
The push to get everyone to take a COVID-19 injection may be the greatest social engineering project the world has ever witnessed. Governments, Big Pharma, corporations, celebrities, health professionals, and the media have been able to convince millions of people to take experimental “vaccines” based on technology never before used in humans. The FDA and CDC declared they were safe (minus a few expected minor side effects) after only a few months of clinical trials and rushed them to market well before the expected 18-month timeline. The tricks used to fast-track these vaccines for widespread use would make even David Copperfield green with envy.
From the outset of the “pandemic,” government officials, health experts, and people like Bill Gates, Zeke Emanuel, and Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus continued to parrot the idea that nothing would ever return to normal until a vaccine arrived to make…
View original post 3,684 more words
The Most Revolutionary Act 
Gene-therapies ? I do not understand what the connection is with vaccinations.
LikeLike
Aunty, the Pfizer and Moderna shots aren’t vaccines in the true sense. Vaccines are normally protein antigens designed to trigger an antibody response in the recipient. The Pfizer and Moderna shots actually contain genetic material (mRNA) intended to instruct the cells of a patient’s body to create spike protein.
LikeLike
“. . . . health professionals, and the media have been able to convince millions of people to take experimental “vaccines” based on technology never before used in humans. . . . ”
Well, I guess, Governments, corporations, and celebrities might tell themselves it is all right to believe what Big Pharma tells them to believe, but how did they get all health professionals and relevant scientists and researches to show approval of all these so called vaccinations?
Social engineering, of course can be done with the general public, including possibly most politicians! But how so with people that have very advanced education and therefore the knowledge, to be able to understand what is involved?
And there really must be quite a lot of these people around, who feel they might be hoodwinked and that are able to point out the things that are not quite right. So, a few dare to say so, but are then being admonished by the majority. This majority must include some people who know something is not right.
How come that even people who should know better, can vouch for something that they ought to not be able to vouch for at all?
LikeLiked by 1 person
They are “following the herd” which tells them this is the way to immunity. Some of us call it “herd mentality.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
Pingback: The Vaccine Divide and Emerging Segregation Society — The Most Revolutionary Act | Aisle C
Excellent point, Katherine. Herd mentality. I like that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It shows there may also be some kind of herd mentality in so called scientists!
Does that mean, ‘social engineering’ can be done that they don’t even notice? I imagine to overcome this ‘herd mentality’ some training in philosophy and the humanities might help! Couldn’t this kind of training be made compulsory for people of influence?
Ha, ha: Lol
I am worried that people who genuinely cannot distinguish fact from fiction very well might get too much influence in the community. 😦
LikeLike
Yes definitely there is herd mentality among medical professionals, Aunty, especially those involved in public health initiatives. This same herd mentality perpetuates the myth that water fluoridation prevents tooth decay (despite decades of incontestable research leading it to be banned in Europe) and the myth that low fat high carbohydrate diets prevent heart attacks (the exact opposite is true).
LikeLiked by 1 person