Neoliberalism Has Met Its Match in China

[B]ecause the Chinese government owns most of the banks, and it prints the currency, it can technically keep those banks alive and lending forever.…

Ellen Brown's avatarWEB OF DEBT BLOG

When the Federal Reserve cut interest rates on July 31st for the first time in more than a decade, commentators were asking why. According to official data, the economy was rebounding, unemployment was below 4%, and GDP growth was above 3%. If anything, by the Fed’s own reasoning, it should have been raising rates.

The explanation of market pundits was that we’re in a trade war and a currency war. Other central banks were cutting their rates and the Fed had to follow suit, in order to prevent the dollar from becoming overvalued relative to other currencies. The theory is that a cheaper dollar will make American products more attractive on foreign markets, helping our manufacturing and labor bases.

Over the weekend, President Trump followed the rate cuts by threatening to impose a new 10% tariff on $300 billion worth of Chinese products effective September 1st. China…

View original post 1,633 more words

2 thoughts on “Neoliberalism Has Met Its Match in China

  1. I agree, James. It’s very hard to get good information on how the Chinese economy operates because their political system is so opaque. It’s pretty obvious, however, that they issue money directly into the economy (what Milton Friedman referred to as “helicopter money”) because they borrow very little on the international market.

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.