
By Matt Agorist
Activistpost.com
In yet another major move from the great folks over at the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and 9/11 victim family members Robert McIlvaine and Barbara Krukowski-Rastelli, a joint federal lawsuit has been filed to assess any evidence the FBI may have known about that contributed to the destruction of the towers on 9/11 which they may have kept from Congress.
The complaint cites the failure of the FBI and its 9/11 Review Commission to assess key 9/11-related evidence that the FBI can be shown to have had, or been aware of, regarding:
- the use of pre-placed explosives to destroy World Trade Center Buildings, 1, 2, and 7;
- the arrest and investigation of the “High Fivers” observed photographing and celebrating the attacks on the World Trade Center on 9/11;
- terrorist financing related the reported Saudi support for the 9/11 hijackers;
- recovered plane parts, including serial numbers from all three crash locations;
- video from cameras mounted inside and outside the Pentagon; and
- cell phone communications from passengers aboard airplanes.
According to the press release on Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, this is evidence relevant to the 9/11 Review Commission’s and the FBI’s compliance with the mandate from Congress, which should have been assessed by the FBI and the 9/11 Review Commission and reported to Congress. The complaint also cites the destruction by the FBI of evidence related to the “High Fivers.” Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth has joined in bringing the counts that involve the evidence of the World Trade Center’s explosive demolition and evidence related to the “High Fivers,” while the other plaintiffs are party to all counts.
As TFTP previously reported, a monumental step forward in the relentless pursuit of 9/11 truth took place last December when a United States Attorney agreed to comply with federal law requiring submission to a Special Grand Jury of evidence that explosives were used to bring down the World Trade Centers. Then, earlier this month, the group behind the submission, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, announced the filing of a “petition supplement” naming persons who may have information related to the use of said explosives.
According to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, the 33-page document contains 15 different categories of persons who may have information material to the investigation, including contractors and security companies that had access to the WTC Towers before 9/11, persons and entities who benefited financially from the WTC demolitions, and persons arrested after being observed celebrating the WTC attacks [. . .]
via Bombshell Lawsuit Claims FBI Knowingly Hid Evidence from Congress of Explosives Used on 9/11
what a shame we have to file lawsuits to get the truth from agencies supposedly working for the american people. that fact alone means the fbi is complicit in a coverup. what are the odds they will cough up the truth? about the same as getting the truth about the jfk assassination, i suppose. nevertheless we must keep on fighting. kudos to the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and 9/11 victim family members Robert McIlvaine and Barbara Krukowski-Rastelli.
LikeLiked by 2 people
My feelings are similar, nomad. I personally feel the timing here is crucial. There is no question in my mind that the US is rapidly losing its grip geopolitically. And as great powers lose their grip, coverups become more and more difficult to maintain.
LikeLiked by 1 person
https://www.ae911truth.org/news/516-courthouse-news-yanks-article-for-its-woefully-fair-and-accurate-coverage-of-9-11-lawsuit
LikeLike
Wow, great link, nomad.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Click to access 00001-LC-Petition-to-Report-Crime-to-Special-Grand-Jury-final-to-be-filed-corrected-042418.pdf
Interesting petition to the U.S. Attorney and not a court, therefore, not technically a lawsuit. U.S. Attorneys have vast discretion in what cases they bring, and rarely venture into the area of government conspiracy. I think they would have stood a better chance bringing a FOIA suit after making the proper requests. See Wesiberg v CIA:
https://casetext.com/case/weisberg-v-united-states-dept-of-justice
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent point, peacefrog. Not being a lawyer myself, I have no idea why they opted for this particular strategy.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on The Chaos Cat.
LikeLike
Pingback: More Holes in the Official Story: The 9/11 Cell Phone Calls | Worldtruth