Most experts agree that the data presented is of a high quality and that the conclusions, although alarming, are reliable.
Sperm count in men from North America, Europe and Australia is declining so quickly that “most men” in these countries will be infertile by the year 2060, according to disturbing new research from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Sperm count in men from Western countries plunged by 50-60% between 1973 and 2011, according to the new study, with the trend set to continue until men are completely infertile.
Interestingly, the study, which analysed data on the sperm counts of 42,935 men, found no decline in sperm counts in men from Africa, South America, and Asia — parts of the world less dominated by Big Pharma, GMOs and toxic, commercially processed “food.”
Chris Barratt, the Professor of Reproductive Medicine at Dundee University says “Overall, this is a very disturbing report.”
“There has been a longstanding debate among scientists as to whether sperm counts have decreased or not. But what’s different about this study…
View original post 369 more words
The Most Revolutionary Act 
Pingback: Majority Of Men In US & Europe Will Be Infertile By 2060 – Study – The Narrow Edge
Probably women infertile too. Probably closer to 2035 than 2060.
There was the famous radiatiation experiment in the 1930s, where all fruit flies were infertile by the third genration after a certain dose of gamma radiation exposure, by radionuclides.
Sternglass noted large increases in infertility and infertile sperm in nuclear explosion surviviors after hiroshima and nagasaki.
It was from gamma ray exposure and residual radionuclide fallout.
Busby noted the same thing, post Chernobyl around Pripyat.
The army noted in atomic veterans and animal experiments, using gamma and radionuclide exposure in the 1950s
Radiation and radionuclide imduced sterility is commonly used as an insect control technique now
Ironic that there has been a 75% killoff of insects on earth, with the flooding of the environment with radionuclides. That is, the flood of radionuclides since 1944 nuclear bombs, 50s nuke teasts, all the uranium, nuclear reactors, nuclear waste and nuclear accidents.
Radionuclides are a billion times more potent than the closest chemical mutagens known to induce sterility in all vertabrates.
We now have millions of tons of radionuclides, everywhere on this planet and especially in the northern hemisphere.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Are we sure this is a bad thing?
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is true Too many stupid, insane humans.
The problem is that Radiation and radionuclides are scorch-the-earth . They will leave the planet Earth, like the BARREN planet Mercury.
Radiation and radionuclides mutate the dna and chromasomes, of all living things. Even viruses.
There are no stable chemical reactions possible with radionuclide present in a system. Especially the biochemical reactions. THE CHEMICAL REACTIONS, that allow life to exist.
The continued flooding of the biosphere with radionuclides is is an extinction event for everything.
If there is no one to mind the fuel pools fuel of the worst radionuclides and nuclear reactors it will occur sooner, than later.
Everything you have been taught about nuclear radionuclides and nuclear radiation is total bullshit.
Once a chomosome and gene is sufficiently mutated it, means the end of that genetic line after 6-8 generations. There are no 50 foot women or giant lizards with nuclear radiation. Only birth defects that ruin childrens lives or create unviable genetic defects that are passed to future generation from mutagenicity and tertogenicity.
LikeLiked by 1 person
To be honest, though I read the article, I was actually replying to the title. I probably sound psychopathic to many people when expressing the opinion that it would be a good thing for the planet if fertility in humans decreased dramatically, I truly think it would be a good thing.
Of course, I didn’t intend to imply that radiation and a flooding of the planet with radionuclides would be a good thing. I’d hope that most life forms will continue to exist after humanity commits suicide.
It isn’t a popular opinion, but I have begun to see the current version of humanity as a virus causing irreparable damage to other life on the planet while committing suicide. Yes, very negative.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I understand where you’re coming from, Shift. How could we humans flood our ecosystems with toxins and radioactive matter and not consider that this could have adverse effects on the human species?
LikeLiked by 1 person
As well as other species. It’s insane, isn’t it? And scary.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree with you, that there are too many people. Maybe the combination of infertility, mortality from poisons and pathogens can help us. The scorch-the earth, hyperconsumption capitalists, militarists, and nucleoapes need to be put out of business . Thankyou for your blog.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for informing people about important issues ignored by corporate media.
Peace.
LikeLike
To be honest, I haven’t decided whether widespread infertility will be a good or bad thing. As Doug points out, it’s likely to be accompanied by high mortality rates and a high degree of emotional suffering.
LikeLiked by 1 person