4 thoughts on “Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act: No Tariff Goes Unpunished – National Compass”
Our present problems are largely due to removal of tariffs and other protectionist policies. By the way, unless one is deprived of even greater wealth to be invested offshore to gain greater riches and avoid paying taxes on those earnings, protectionism is a noble word. Like military protection. Under the Bush managed Reagan years, American taxpayers helped finance the shipping of our industrial base out of the country. We went from the world’s greatest creditor nation to the world’s largest debtor nation, and we have plunged ever since. By the way, the problems were compounded by the recipients of our manufacturing base by offering a labor force requiring suicide nets at the workplace, environmental laws, work rules, labor laws, etc., did not apply to them but we’re made stricter in the U. S. Additionally, central banks were the biggest winners. Increased national debt, removal of Glass-Steagall, and foreclosure of mortgages resulted as planned. As for Smoot-Hawley, that was signed into law June 1930; the depression began September 1929. It was caused by Wall Street and lack of funds with which the public could purchase the goods that had been manufactured. Add to that the military coup attempted by J. P. Morgan and friends and the confiscation of gold demanded and paid for at less than its value only to be made available once again at a higher price. If we don’t know whom we should not trust now, I don’t know if we ever will.
Theoretically I agree with you, marblenecltr, that local communities (and democratic input) is stronger if greater emphasis is placed on building strong local and regional economies. In general, only banks benefit from globalism – not ordinary people.
That being said, sudden tariff changes can put a lot of working people who depend on exports out of work.
I also agree that the banks triggered the 1929 Depression by contracting the monetary supply. I think the original author of this article acknowledges this. However because the US economy depended on vigorous foreign trade, once Smoot-Hawley took effect the US economy tanked even further when a lot of people in export industries were put out of work.
Same here, Rosaliene. I was never taught any of this stuff in school. If you haven’t read Tragedy and Hope by the late Caroll Quigley that’s a great place to start.
Our present problems are largely due to removal of tariffs and other protectionist policies. By the way, unless one is deprived of even greater wealth to be invested offshore to gain greater riches and avoid paying taxes on those earnings, protectionism is a noble word. Like military protection. Under the Bush managed Reagan years, American taxpayers helped finance the shipping of our industrial base out of the country. We went from the world’s greatest creditor nation to the world’s largest debtor nation, and we have plunged ever since. By the way, the problems were compounded by the recipients of our manufacturing base by offering a labor force requiring suicide nets at the workplace, environmental laws, work rules, labor laws, etc., did not apply to them but we’re made stricter in the U. S. Additionally, central banks were the biggest winners. Increased national debt, removal of Glass-Steagall, and foreclosure of mortgages resulted as planned. As for Smoot-Hawley, that was signed into law June 1930; the depression began September 1929. It was caused by Wall Street and lack of funds with which the public could purchase the goods that had been manufactured. Add to that the military coup attempted by J. P. Morgan and friends and the confiscation of gold demanded and paid for at less than its value only to be made available once again at a higher price. If we don’t know whom we should not trust now, I don’t know if we ever will.
LikeLike
Theoretically I agree with you, marblenecltr, that local communities (and democratic input) is stronger if greater emphasis is placed on building strong local and regional economies. In general, only banks benefit from globalism – not ordinary people.
That being said, sudden tariff changes can put a lot of working people who depend on exports out of work.
I also agree that the banks triggered the 1929 Depression by contracting the monetary supply. I think the original author of this article acknowledges this. However because the US economy depended on vigorous foreign trade, once Smoot-Hawley took effect the US economy tanked even further when a lot of people in export industries were put out of work.
Thanks for your comment.
LikeLike
Informative and interesting, Dr. Bramhall. I’m catching up, a bit at a time, on American economic history.
LikeLike
Same here, Rosaliene. I was never taught any of this stuff in school. If you haven’t read Tragedy and Hope by the late Caroll Quigley that’s a great place to start.
LikeLike