Why Does Trump Suddenly Want Combat Troops Home From Afghanistan By Election Day?

Quote

President Trump has repeatedly voiced a desire to leave Afghanistan sooner than the timeline laid out in the Feb. 29 peace agreement. He may want to campaign on bringing home every soldier.

American troops during a visit last year by President Trump to Bagram air base outside Kabul.
Credit…Erin Schaff/The New York Times

By Thomas Gibbons-Neff and

WASHINGTON — Senior military officials are set to brief President Trump in the coming days on options for pulling all American troops out of Afghanistan, with one possible timeline for withdrawing forces before the presidential election, according to officials with knowledge of the plans.

The proposal for a complete withdrawal by November reflects an understanding among military commanders that such a timeline may be Mr. Trump’s preferred option because it may help bolster his campaign.

But they plan to propose, and to advocate, a slower withdrawal schedule, officials said.

The move is part of the Pentagon’s attempt to avoid another situation like the one in December 2018 and again in October 2019, when Mr. Trump surprised military officials by ordering the complete withdrawal of U.S. troops from Syria. Diplomatic chaos and violence followed, and the president subsequently modified each announcement. American troops remain in Syria, although in smaller numbers.

Senior military officials believe a quick withdrawal from Afghanistan would effectively doom the peace deal reached this year with the Taliban.

In recent months, Mr. Trump has repeatedly voiced a desire to leave Afghanistan sooner than the timeline laid out in the Feb. 29 peace agreement with the Taliban, which stipulated U.S. troops would leave in 12 to 14 months if the insurgent group met certain conditions.

The Pentagon is expected to try to persuade a commander in chief who has made clear his desire to end America’s involvement in what he has criticized as “endless wars” — and who has regularly surprised the military with his decisions […]

via Why Does Trump Suddenly Want Combat Troops Home From Afghanistan By Election Day?

28 million elective surgeries may be cancelled worldwide: how non-COVID-19 medical care is suffering

Quote

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Emma Charlton, Senior Writer, Formative Content


  • 28 million elective surgeries across the globe may be cancelled during 12 weeks of peak disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Study indicates that each extra week of disruption is associated with 2.4 million cancellations.
  • 38% of global cancer surgery has been postponed or cancelled.
  • Backlog could take 45 weeks to clear.

COVID-19’s long-lasting impact on our health could include more than 28 million cancelled or postponed operations, creating a backlog that will take the best part of a year to clear. And the number could be even worse if lockdowns continue for longer, according to a new study.

Using data from surgeons in 359 hospitals across 71 countries, CovidSurg Collaborative researchers, including those from the University of Birmingham, created a statistical model to estimate the total number of cancelled elective surgeries during 12 weeks of peak disruption in 190 countries. Their result was 2,367,050 operations per week.

Elective surgery cancellations due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

These numbers are likely to worsen for each additional week that the lockdown or restrictions continue, underscoring how COVID-19’s widespread scars on health go beyond the direct impact of the virus. The United Nations has already warned that pregnancy and birth services will probably suffer, and some mass vaccination campaigns have been temporarily suspended.

“Cancelling elective surgery at this scale will have substantial impact on patients and cumulative, potentially devastating consequences for health systems worldwide,” says Aneel Bhangu, a consultant surgeon and senior lecturer at the University of Birmingham.

“Delaying time-sensitive elective operations, such as cancer or transplant surgery, may lead to deteriorating health, worsening quality of life, and unnecessary deaths.”

via 28 million elective surgeries may be cancelled worldwide: how non-COVID-19 medical care is suffering — The European Sting – Critical News & Insights on European Politics, Economy, Foreign Affairs, Business & Technology – europeansting.com

EU admits “American-led system” nears its end

Quote

By Paul Antonopoulos | May 26, 2020

European Union foreign affairs chief Josep Borrell told a gathering of German ambassadors on Monday that “analysts have long talked about the end of an American-led system and the arrival of an Asian century. This is now happening in front of our eyes.” He said that the coronavirus pandemic could be the catalyst to shift power from West to East and that “pressure to choose sides is growing”  for the EU, before adding that the 27-nation bloc “should follow our own interests and values and avoid being instrumentalised by one or the other.”

Borrell said “we only have a chance if we deal with China with collective discipline,” noting that an upcoming EU-China summit this autumn could be an opportunity to do so. “We need a more robust strategy for China, which also requires better relations with the rest of democratic Asia.”

As China, India, Japan, Indonesia and Russia will become some of the world’s biggest economies by 2030, according to Standard Chartered Plc, the 21st century is known as the “Asian Century.” So, the EU has a serious decision to make on whether to continue its hostile approach towards Russia if it wishes to have more straight forward trade access to Asia. Putin has made incentives for colonists to populate the Far East of Russia to boost its small population of under seven million people who live close to China to fully and better engage in the “Asian Century” […]

 

via EU admitted “American-led system” nears its end

California May Soon Mandate Uber & Lyft Shift To Electric Vehicles

Quote

Uber Lyft Drivers.com

California wants more EVs for Uber and Lyft, and may have a plan to make that happen. People who drive for Uber and Lyft often heavily depend on that income, whether it is secondary or primary. The demand for these services has been much lower lately due to the current pandemic, which is hurting them.

For people like me, without a car, I used Uber often until the pandemic struck and I stayed home and started using Instacart to have my groceries delivered. I chose this method because just like with Uber and Lyft, these drivers depend on their tips and income.

Despite the ongoing pandemic, though, California believes now is the time for Uber and Lyft to get their act together environmentally. The state is planning to mandate a phased shift to electric vehicles for transportation network companies. In a public workshop held last week (via a conference call), the California Air Resources Board (CARB) talked about how it is going to do this.

The Big Problem with Uber & Lyft

Carbon Footprint

The main issue Uber & Lyft have is that transportation networks such as these contribute about 1% of California’s greenhouse gas emissions for the light-duty vehicle sector. That amount is growing rapidly — or was until the state went into lockdown. The state also noted that transportation in general contributes to half of the state’s greenhouse gas emissions. 70% of that comes from light-duty vehicles.

You may think, “well, people are going to be driving anyway,” but there are a few ways that Uber and Lyft add to emissions rather than simply replacing them.

Deadhead Miles

The state released some data in 2019: 39% of ride-hailing trips are “deadhead miles.” This term refers to miles driven by the driver returning to or from the trip. This creates 50% more greenhouse-gas emissions than the average car trip. You wouldn’t drive to work and then back home in the morning and then repeat that in the evening […]

via California May Soon Mandate Uber & Lyft Shift To Electric Vehicles — Uber Lyft Drivers.com

Study: White Supremacist Groups Are ‘Thriving’ On Facebook, Despite Extremist Ban

Quote

Nappy News

A new study reports that white supremacist groups are “thriving” on Facebook, despite repeated assurances from the company that it doesn’t allow extremists on its platform.

The watchdog group Tech Transparency Project released a study Thursday that found more than 100 white supremacist groups had a presence on Facebook.

Project researchers identified 221 white supremacist groups — using information collected by Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti-Defamation League, two of America’s most prominent anti-hate organizations — and searched for those groups on Facebook.

About 50% of the groups were present on the platform, the study said.

Of the 113 white supremacist groups the project found on Facebook, 36% had pages or groups created by active users. The remaining 64% had a page auto-generated by Facebook itself.

“With millions of people now quarantining at home and vulnerable to ideologies that seek to exploit people’s fears and resentments about COVID-19, Facebook’s failure to remove white supremacist groups could give these organizations fertile new ground to attract followers,” TTP’s study said […]

 
via Study: White Supremacist Groups Are ‘Thriving’ On Facebook, Despite Extremist Ban — Nappy Newz

Painful US sanctions have also led to great achievements in Iran

Quote

Press TV – May 20, 2020

US sanctions have caused immense pain and harm to Iranians over the years, but they also led to great achievements such as self-sufficiency in many products.

“Despite the harsh conditions of the country and the illegal and unjust sanctions and the severe economic pressure of the United States, production in Iran has not stopped and today we are witnessing great successes such as self-sufficiency in wheat and other food and agricultural products,” President Hassan Rouhani said late Tuesday.

“We are also self-sufficient in gasoline, gas and diesel production today, and infrastructure work done in the country for years has helped us succeed in the fight against the coronavirus,” he added.

A draconian sanctions regime has motivated Iran to rely on its resources and do some tasks which were deemed far beyond the scope of the country’s capacities.

For example, the US and the Europeans reportedly laughed off Iran’s warning that it would move to carry out 20-percent uranium enrichment on its own if they did not provide the Islamic Republic with the technology.

After Iran announced mastering the technology, its enemies were so enraged that they assassinated the nuclear scientist behind the feat, Majid Shahriari, in November 2010.

Most lately, the country has had to mobilize its resources and produce necessary supplies like masks, gowns, respirators, and ventilators for its coronavirus patients after the US defied international calls to halt its sanctions on the Islamic Republic in order to allow it to fight the pandemic.

On Tuesday, Vice President Sorena Sattari said Iran can now produce anything it needs in its coronavirus fight and is already an exporter of testing kits.

Iran produces more than 96% of its medical needs, but pharmaceutical companies rely on local formulation of generic drugs, which means they have to import ingredients for some drugs.

Some of the generic brands formulated, processed and packaged in Iran are licensed by European and American companies and their production includes imports of semi-manufactured drugs which has been disrupted by the sanctions.

Even food imports are not exempt from the sanctions, despite US claims to the contrary, forcing Tehran to pursue food security with additional seriousness […]

 

via Painful US sanctions have also led to great achievements in Iran

Unemployment Skyrockets, So Does Hunger

Quote

By BARRY SHEPPARD

The Labor Department recently released figures for the unemployment rate for April, saying that the rate was 14.7 percent, the highest since the Great Depression of the 1930s. The Labor Department said that because of how it classifies workers, the real figure could be 20 percent.

These figures reflect the situation as it was in mid-April, more than a month ago, and millions more have applied for unemployment insurance since, with the reported total as of May 9 reaching 36 million. Eleven million workers reported working part time because they couldn’t find full time work, up from four million before the pandemic.

Many millions tried to apply, but the unemployment agencies were so swamped they either couldn’t process these attempts or were weeks late.

A May 15 article in the New York Times titled “Job Losses Mount Even as U.S. Begins to Lift Lockdown” reports that, according to a poll they had conducted by a polling firm, “more than half of those applying for unemployment benefits in recent weeks were unsuccessful.”

The article also says, “In places where the fitful reopening has started, workers called back often face reduced hours and paychecks as well a heightened risk of infection. Declining to return, however, is likely to put an end to any jobless benefits.

“‘It’s a very tough choice for those in the service industry and those at the lower end of the pay scale,’ Rubeela Farooqi, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics said. ‘Do you go back and risk getting sick, or have no money coming in?’”

Service industry jobs have a high percentage of African American and Latino workers. Also in the “lower end of the pay scale” are Native Americans and poorer whites.

It is clear that the U.S. economy and the working class has been hard hit.

Capitalists are pressuring both parties to lift all aspects of the shutdown. They want to get back to the business of making profit, even if that means more deaths.

Most states are trying to reopen businesses shut down by the pandemic. Some states are being cautious and are linking what businesses to reopen to safety measures to keep the virus from spiking again, while others are more reckless.

An experiment is underway. Will the reopening, with more and more people going back to workplaces, where they may be exposed to the virus, and others traveling, and crowds developing without keeping safe distances, result in a new spike in infections and deaths, leading to a need for reversal?

On May 18, deaths from the virus in the U.S. reached 90,000, according to the official count. We know that the real figure is much higher, since the official figure comes mainly from deaths recorded in hospitals and nursing homes, where tests confirmed they were caused by the virus.

One way that researchers use to discover the true number of COVID-19-related deaths is to look at the overall monthly number of reported deaths from all causes this year, compared with previous years. By looking at how many more people overall have died this year than in previous years, you can get an idea of the true number of coronavirus deaths, even if they are not classified as COVID-19-related due to lack of testing. Many who die at home or on the streets go untested, and their deaths are not recorded in official COVID-19 death statistics. And indeed, huge differences in the number of monthly reported deaths in many places compared to previous years prove that the official reported figure is far lower than the real number.

The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington has now predicted that the death toll will increase, due to increased mobility of the population. Institute Director Dr. Christopher Murray said that some states that have moved to reopen are seeing double-digit spikes in reported cases.

There is a time lag between exposure and development of symptoms, and more time before deaths occur and are reported. It will take months to see the full results of the opening up of businesses in this experiment with people’s lives.

What Trump hopes is that a quick opening up of all the economy will mean it will come roaring back. Some bourgeois economists agree with him, at least to some extent. But we should be more cautious. We are in a situation never before seen in the history of capitalism. We know there will be major short-term and long-term economic effects.

Another factor is that just as the pandemic is international in scope, so is the economic impact. What happens to the world economy will affect the U.S. For example, the European Union said that it will experience a “deep and uneven recession” of historic proportions, with a contraction of 7.5 percent in 2020 in its member countries. That certainly will have an effect on the U.S.

Hunger Grows in the United States

Worldwide, the pandemic has greatly increased lack of sufficient food, with large numbers in the Global South (oppressed nations, the majority of humanity) facing starvation. Just as the poorer nations suffer the most, within the U.S. the poorest are hit the hardest.

At the end of April 2020, nearly one-quarter of all U.S. households reported not having enough food to eat – double the amount of a similar survey in 2018 […]

via Unemployment Skyrockets, So Does Hunger — Socialist Action

Iran’s fuel shipment to Venezuela guaranteed by its missile power

Quote

Press TV – May 16, 2020

Iran is shipping tons of gasoline to Venezuela in defiance of US sanctions on both countries in a symbolic move guaranteed by Tehran’s missile prowess.

Unconfirmed reports and tanker monitoring groups suggest that at least five Iranian-flagged tankers are transporting fuel to Venezuela through the Atlantic Ocean despite the US sanctions on both Tehran and Caracas.

Iran has intentionally hoisted its own flag over the huge tankers which are navigating through the Atlantic before the eyes of the US Navy.

Iran is shipping large consignments of gasoline to Venezuela even though the US may try to intercept the shipments and seize the tankers.

There are unconfirmed reports that the US Navy has deployed its USS Detroit (LCS-7), USS Lassen (DDG-82), USS Preble (DDG-88), and USS Farragut (DDG-99) to the Caribbean along with its patrol aircraft Boeing P8-Poseidon for possible encounter with the Iranian vessels.

However, analysts say it is very unlikely that the US makes such a mistake, as it would have serious repercussions for the Trump administration ahead of the November elections.

The US would not dare to seize the Iranian vessels especially after Iran’s reaction to a similar move by the United Kingdom, a close ally of Washington.

Iran also has the upper hand thanks to its missile power, which was shown to the US in the IRGC’s retaliatory missile attacks on the Ain al-Assad Airbase in Iraq, which accommodated American troops.

The US was also reminded of the Islamic Republic’s missile prowess following the recent successful launch of Nour-1 military satellite, which reached its orbit using the Qased satellite carrier. Some Western analysts claim the satellite achievements are a prelude to Iran’s program to develop intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs).

Confident about its missile capabilities, Iran is going on with the gasoline shipment to its ally in Latin America, mocking the US sanctions on the oil sectors of both countries […]

 

via Iran’s fuel shipment to Venezuela guaranteed by its missile power

Transit Is Drawn to On-Demand Model in Kansas — Uber Lyft Drivers.com

Quote

Transit experiments like on-demand, shared rides in small bus-like vehicles could become one of the numerous changes to public transit in a post-COVID-19 world.

Officials in Johnson County, Kan., have announced plans to continue a march toward more flexible options for riders, expanding on an existing pilot program. “Our interest at this point is to address the COVID-19-induced loss of ridership with flex service on low-ridership routes. If we use on-demand flex service instead of running fixed service all day, we believe we can continue to meet essential mobility needs and also conserve resources,” said Josh Powers, business liaison for Johnson County Government.

The intent, said Powers, is not to replace all fixed routes with flex service — where riders hail a transit vehicle generally with an app, much like interfacing with Uber or Lyft — or even to necessarily make the move permanent […]

via Transit Is Being Drawn to an On-Demand Model in Kansas — Uber Lyft Drivers.com

Video: Tories ‘appropriate level of reward’ for front-line heroes is a 2-year pay freeze

Quote

https://videopress.com/embed/bzGM4O3A?preloadContent=metadata&hd=0

Raab said nurses and other front-line staff would receive ‘appropriate’ recognition when crisis ends. Seems he meant yet another pay-freeze as Tories slap heroes in face A future Conservative monument to the sacrifice and courage of NHS and other front-line staff?

Just over a month ago Dominic Raab – at that time stand-in weasel Prime Minister  at the daily coronavirus press briefing – squirmed out of answering the question of whether the Tories would concretely reward NHS and other front-line staff for their commitment and sacrifice with a significant pay-rise.

Raab would only say that those front-line heroes would eventually receive ‘an appropriate level of reward’:

But just what is an ‘appropriate level of reward’ in the Tory mind? Well, now we know: a 2-year pay freeze […]

via Video: Tories ‘appropriate level of reward’ for front-line heroes is a 2-year pay freeze — SKWAWKBOX