AI in Wyoming may soon use more electricity than state’s human residents

Benj Edwards
30 Jul 2025

Proposed data center would demand 5x Wyoming’s current power use at full deployment.

On Monday, Mayor Patrick Collins of Cheyenne, Wyoming, announced plans for an AI data center that would consume more electricity than all homes in the state combined, according to The Associated Press. The facility, a joint venture between energy infrastructure company Tallgrass and AI data center developer Crusoe, would start at 1.8 gigawatts and scale up to 10 gigawatts of power use.

The project’s energy demands are difficult to overstate for Wyoming, the least populous US state. The initial 1.8-gigawatt phase, consuming 15.8 terawatt-hours (TWh) annually, is more than five times the electricity used by every household in the state combined. That figure represents 91 percent of the 17.3 TWh currently consumed by all of Wyoming’s residential, commercial, and industrial sectors combined. At its full 10-gigawatt capacity, the proposed data center would consume 87.6 TWh of electricity annually—double the 43.2 TWh the entire state currently generates.

Because drawing this much power from the public grid is untenable, the project will rely on its own dedicated gas generation and renewable energy sources, according to Collins and company officials. However, this massive local demand for electricity—even if self-generated—represents a fundamental shift for a state that currently sends nearly 60 percent of its generated power to other states.

Wyoming Governor Mark Gordon praised the project’s potential benefits for the state’s natural gas industry in a company statement. “This is exciting news for Wyoming and for Wyoming natural gas producers,” Gordon said.

The proposed site for the new data center sits several miles south of Cheyenne near the Colorado border off US Route 85. While state and local regulators still need to approve the project, Collins expressed optimism about a quick start. “I believe their plans are to go sooner rather than later,” he said.

Wyoming’s data center boom

Cheyenne is no stranger to data centers, having attracted facilities from Microsoft and Meta since 2012 due to its cool climate and energy access. However, the new project pushes the state into uncharted territory. While Wyoming is the nation’s third-biggest net energy supplier, producing 12 times more total energy than it consumes (dominated by fossil fuels), its electricity supply is finite.

While Tallgrass and Crusoe have announced the partnership, they haven’t revealed who will ultimately use all this computing power—leading to speculation about potential tenants.

A potential connection to OpenAI’s Stargate AI infrastructure project, announced in January, remains a subject of speculation. When asked by The Associated Press if the Cheyenne project was part of this effort, Crusoe spokesperson Andrew Schmitt was noncommittal. “We are not at a stage that we are ready to announce our tenant there,” Schmitt said. “I can’t confirm or deny that it’s going to be one of the Stargate.”

OpenAI recently activated the first phase of a Crusoe-built data center complex in Abilene, Texas, in partnership with Oracle. Chris Lehane, OpenAI’s chief global affairs officer, told The Associated Press last week that the Texas facility generates “roughly and depending how you count, about a gigawatt of energy” and represents “the largest data center—we think of it as a campus—in the world.”

OpenAI has committed to developing an additional 4.5 gigawatts of data center capacity through an agreement with Oracle. “We’re now in a position where we have, in a really concrete way, identified over five gigawatts of energy that we’re going to be able to build around,” Lehane told the AP. The company has not disclosed locations for these expansions, and Wyoming was not among the 16 states where OpenAI said it was searching for data center sites earlier this year.

[…]

Via https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2025/07/ai-in-wyoming-may-soon-use-more-electricity-than-states-human-residents/

Slovenia Becomes First EU Member to Ban Trade with Israel

Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob

Press TV

In a significant development in the ongoing global boycott of Israel, Slovenia has officially become the first European Union member state to ban the import, export, and transit of weapons and military equipment to and from Israel.

The groundbreaking decision made on Thursday marks a notable shift in Slovenia’s foreign policy and highlights the growing support for Palestinian rights within Europe.

The Slovenian government underscored that the ban was prompted by the dire humanitarian catastrophe unfolding in Gaza, coupled with the European Union’s perceived inaction regarding Israel’s war in Gaza.

Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob emphasized that this move showcases Slovenia’s unwavering commitment to upholding international law and human rights.

“Responsible states must act, even if it means stepping ahead of others,” he remarked, signaling Slovenia’s willingness to take a stand for what it deems morally and legally right.

The Slovenian government said the decision was prompted by the European Union’s inability to adopt concrete measures on Israel.

“Due to internal disagreements and disunity, the European Union is currently unable to fulfill this task,” the statement said.

The Slovenian government condemned the denial of humanitarian access, saying: “The result of this is shameful: people in Gaza are dying because humanitarian aid is systematically denied to them. They are dying under the rubble, without access to drinking water, food, and basic healthcare.”

“This is a complete denial of humanitarian access and a conscious prevention of basic conditions for survival. In such circumstances, it is the duty of every responsible state to act, even if this means taking a step ahead of others.”

It said the government will prepare some more national measures against the current Israeli government, “whose actions constitute serious violations of international humanitarian law,” in the coming weeks.

Slovenia’s decision builds on its previous recognition of Palestinian statehood in 2024 and follows a recent ban on the entry of two far-right Israeli ministers who have been accused of inciting violence against Palestinians.

This illustrates Slovenia’s increasingly proactive approach towards addressing issues related to human rights and international law in the conflict.

The ban aligns Slovenia with a growing chorus of voices calling for accountability for Israel, as several countries—including Ireland, Norway, and Spain—are also taking measures to diplomatically isolate the Israeli government.

This trend marks a significant shift in European attitudes toward the ongoing genocide of the people of Gaza and reflects an increasing concern for the humanitarian implications of military actions.

Furthermore, Slovenia has indicated that it plans to introduce additional national measures targeting Israel in the weeks to come, signaling a potential shift that could inspire other EU nations to follow suit.

As Slovenia takes this historic step, it sets a precedenOKt for a tougher stance on the genocide within the European Union, potentially reshaping the region’s diplomatic landscape.

Israel unleashed its Gaza genocide on October 7, 2023, after the Hamas resistance group carried out its historic operation against the occupying entity in retaliation for the regime’s intensified atrocities against the Palestinian people.

The Tel Aviv regime has so far failed to achieve its declared objectives of eliminating Hamas and freeing all captives in Gaza, despite killing 60,249 Palestinians, mostly women, and children, and injuring 146,894 others.

A mass starvation is also gripping Gaza due to Israel’s blockade of the territory.

Last November, the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former minister of military affairs Yoav Gallant, citing war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza. Furthermore, Israel is facing a genocide case at the International Court of Justice regarding its actions in the besieged coastal territory.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2025/08/01/752226/Slovenia-becomes-first-EU-member-to-ban-arms-trade-with-Israel

Moscow denounces conviction of Bosnian Serb leader

Moscow comments on conviction of Bosnian Serb leader

RT

The court in Bosnia and Herzegovina was relying on a “pseudo-law” and its actions were “illegitimate,” the Kremlin has said.

Russia has denounced the conviction of Bosnian Serb leader Milorad Dodik by a court in Sarajevo, describing it as an “absolutely political” decision. The move could have wide-reaching repercussions for the entire Balkan region, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said.

A Bosnian court sentenced Dodik, the president of Republika Srpska, to one year in prison on Wednesday. He was charged with obstructing decisions made by Bosnia’s constitutional court and defying the authority of international envoy Christian Schmidt. A German national, Schmidt was formally tasked with overseeing the implementation of the 1995 Dayton Peace Agreement that concluded the Bosnian war. Moscow questions his legitimacy due to what it considers to be appointment irregularities.

“We condemn such actions because they can have very negative consequences not just for Bosnia and Herzegovina but for the Balkans as a whole,” Peskov told journalists on Thursday, referring to the court decision. “These actions could lead to destabilization,” he added.

The Kremlin spokesman also condemned the court ruling as persecution of not just the Bosnian Serb leader but “all the patriotic Serb forces.” According to Peskov, the decision was based on a “pseudo-law” pushed through by Schmidt. The Bosnian court ruled that Dodik acted illegally when he signed laws making the peace envoy’s decrees illegal in Republika Srpska and suspended the enforcement of Bosnia’s top court rulings on its territory.

Schmidt’s appointment as the High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina has never received the approval of the UN Security Council, which is typically required in such cases, Peskov said. The official was appointed by the Peace Implementation Council (PIC) – an international body charged with implementing the 1995 Dayton Peace Agreement – back in 2021.

Russia and China officially stated that they did not recognize Schmidt’s legitimacy due to the irregularities in his appointment. On Thursday, Peskov branded the official “an imposter” and called on the Bosnian authorities to go back to the “spirit” of the Dayton agreements.

Dodik himself did not attend his sentencing and announced plans for the Republika Srpska National Assembly to reject the court’s decision and prohibit the enforcement of any rulings from Bosnia’s state judiciary within its territory. He added that Republika Srpska would obstruct the operations of Bosnia’s central government and police within its jurisdiction.

The politician has two weeks to appeal the verdict, although it is unclear if he plans to do so. The court ruling was also condemned by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who talked to Dodik following the verdict. The Hungarian leader branded it a “political witch hunt.”

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/russia/613404-moscow-conviction-bosnian-serb-leader/

Trump Administration Partners With Big Tech to Launch Controversial “Private Health Tracking System

President Donald Trump walks from Marine One after arriving on the South Lawn of the White House, Tuesday, July 29, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)

 

President Donald Trump walks from Marine One after arriving on the South Lawn of the White House, Tuesday, July 29, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)

 

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration announced it is launching a new program that will allow Americans to share personal health data and medical records across health systems and apps run by private tech companies, promising that will make it easier to access health records and monitor wellness.

More than 60 companies, including major tech companies like Google, Amazon and Apple as well as health care giants like UnitedHealth Group and CVS Health, have agreed to share patient data in the system. The initiative will focus on diabetes and weight management, conversational artificial intelligence that helps patients, and digital tools such as QR codes and apps that register patients for check-ins or track medications.

“For decades America’s health care networks have been overdue for a high tech upgrade,” President Donald Trump said during an event with company CEOs at the White House on Wednesday. “The existing systems are often slow, costly and incompatible with one another, but with today’s announcement, we take a major step to bring health care into the digital age.”

The system, spearheaded by an administration that has already freely shared highly personal data about Americans in ways that have tested legal bounds, could put patients’ desires for more convenience at their doctor’s office on a collision course with their expectations that their medical information be kept private.

There are enormous ethical and legal concerns,” said Lawrence Gostin, a Georgetown University law professor who specializes in public health. “Patients across America should be very worried that their medical records are going to be used in ways that harm them and their families.”

Officials at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, who will be in charge of maintaining the system, have said patients will need to opt in for the sharing of their medical records and data, which will be kept secure.

Those officials said patients will benefit from a system that lets them quickly call up their own records without the hallmark difficulties, such as requiring the use of fax machines to share documents, that have prevented them from doing so in the past.

“We’re going to have remarkable advances in how consumers can use their own records,” Dr. Mehmet Oz, who leads the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said during the White House event.

Popular weight loss and fitness subscription service Noom, which has signed onto the initiative, will be able to pull medical records after the system’s expected launch early next year.

That might include labs or medical tests that the app could use to develop an AI-driven analysis of what might help users lose weight, CEO Geoff Cook told The Associated Press. Apps and health systems will also have access to their competitors’ information, too. Noom would be able to access a person’s data from Apple Health, for example.

“Right now you have a lot of siloed data,” Cook said.

Patients who travel across the country for treatment at the Cleveland Clinic often have a hard time obtaining all their medical records from various providers, said the hospital system’s CEO, Dr. Tomislav Mihaljevic. He said the new system would eliminate that barrier, which sometimes delays treatment or prevents doctors from making an accurate diagnosis because they do not have a full view of a patient’s medical history.

Having seamless access to health app data, such as what patients are eating or how much they are exercising, will also help doctors manage obesity and other chronic diseases, Mihaljevic said.

“These apps give us insight about what’s happening with the patient’s health outside of the physician’s office,” he said.

CMS will also recommend a list of apps on Medicare.gov that are designed to help people manage chronic diseases, as well as help them select health care providers and insurance plans.

Digital privacy advocates are skeptical that patients will be able to count on their data being stored securely.

The federal government, however, has done little to regulate health apps or telehealth programs, said Jeffrey Chester at the Center for Digital Democracy.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and those within his circle have pushed for more technology in health care, advocating for wearable devices that monitor wellness and telehealth.

Kennedy also sought to collect more data from Americans’ medical records, which he has previously said he wants to use to study autism and vaccine safety. Kennedy has filled the agency with staffers who have a history of working at or running health technology startups and businesses.

CMS already has troves of information on more than 140 million Americans who enroll in Medicare and Medicaid. Earlier this month, the federal agency agreed to hand over its massive database, including home addresses, to deportation officials.

The new initiative would deepen the pool of information on patients for the federal government and tech companies. Medical records typically contain far more sensitive information, such as doctors’ notes about conversations with patients and substance abuse or mental health history.

“This scheme is an open door for the further use and monetization of sensitive and personal health information,” Chester said.

The Trump administration tried to launch a less ambitious electronic record program in 2018 that did not get finalized during his first term, but it did not have buy in from major tech companies at the time.

[…]

Via https://apnews.com/article/trump-ai-rfk-jr-health-tech-fa73703bd1fd557c787ef0b590e151f1

Senate Votes Down Two Resolutions to Block Israeli Weapons Sales

bernie sanders 2025 (3x4 cropped)

By Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America – Bernie Sanders, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=170173560

Libertarian Institute

On Wednesday night, the U.S. Senate voted down two joint resolutions aimed at blocking additional weapons sales to Israel. Both measures were originally introduced by U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) in March.

The first resolution would have prohibited the sale of 20,000 fully automatic carbine rifles to Israeli forces, while the second resolution sought to cut off $675.7 million in arms sales. The latter measure would have barred the sale of 201 MK 83 1,000-pound bombs; 4,799 BLU-110A/B General Purpose 1,000-pound bombs; 1,500 Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) guidance kits for MK 83 bombs; 3,500 JDAM guidance kits for MK 83 bombs; and related logistics and technical support services. Sanders argued that the weapons sales would violate both the Foreign Assistance Act and the Arms Export Control Act.

“History will condemn those of us who failed to act in the face of these horrors,” he said in the run-up to Wednesday night’s vote.

The two measures failed 27-70 and 24-73, respectively. More than half of the Democratic caucus voted in favor of the resolutions. The Republican caucus, including U.S. Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), voted unanimously against both measures.

Sanders forced the votes in response to the ongoing starvation crisis in the Gaza Strip and the IDF’s continued massacre of Palestinian civilians. He blamed the famine on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s policies, citing the six-week siege on the Strip. He also condemned the Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation’s distribution model for leading to the deaths of over 1,000 Palestinians.

“U.S. taxpayers have spent tens of billions of dollars in support of the racist, extremist Netanyahu government. Enough is enough,” the senior senator from Vermont said. “We cannot continue to spend taxpayer money on a government which has killed some 60,000 Palestinians and wounded more than 143,000, most of whom are women, children, and the elderly. We cannot continue supporting a government which has blocked humanitarian aid, caused massive famine, and literally starved the people of Gaza.”

“The time is long overdue for Congress to use the leverage we have – tens of billions in arms and military aid – to demand that Israel end these atrocities,” he added.

Since the October 7 terrorist attacks, the U.S. has provided more than $22 billion in military aid to Israel. In May, Haaretz reported that the U.S. has covered about 70% of Israeli military spending since the genocide began.

During an interview with CNN’s Kaitlan Collins Wednesday night, Sanders stopped short of labeling Israel’s actions a genocide. “Genocide is a legal term. What is going on now clearly is absolutely horrific…But the important point is not what you call it. It is horror, and I think the whole world knows that. The answer is, what the hell do we do about it?” he said.

[…]

Via https://libertarianinstitute.org/news/senate-votes-down-two-resolutions-to-block-israeli-weapons-sales/

Canada to recognize Palestinian state in September

A man in a suit speaks at a podium in front of a row of Canadian flags. A women stands behind him.
Prime Minister Mark Carney said Canada plans to formally recognize the state of Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly this fall. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

Palestinian Authority must commit to reforms for Canada to recognize statehood

[…]

At a news conference Wednesday, Prime Minister Mark Carney said Canada will recognize a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in September, but the West Bank’s governing body must agree to certain conditions including committing to holding an election in 2026.

Carney’s announcement came after he spoke to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas earlier Wednesday.

Mona Abuamara, the former chief representative of the Palestinian General Delegation to Canada, told CBC’s Power & Politics that she believes the commitments Carney set out are achievable.

“The Palestinian people have been living hell for two years. They know what they want. They need the opportunity to actually build their own state,” she told guest host David Common.

The Palestinian Authority currently controls parts of the West Bank through the Fatah party. Hamas governs in Gaza. Neither territory has held an election since 2006.

Carney said Hamas can have no role in the election he is proposing. He also reiterated that Hamas needs to release the remaining Israeli hostages and said a Palestinian state must be demilitarized.

The announcement follows similar commitments from other allied countries in the past week.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Tuesday the U.K. will also recognize a Palestinian state in September unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire in Gaza, allows the UN to bring in aid and takes other steps toward long-term peace.

[…]

France announced a similar plan last week, but without conditions. Ireland, Norway and Spain have all recognized Palestine within the last year.

Carney said he has spoken to both Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron in recent days.

“In our judgment, and the judgment of others, the prospect of a Palestinian state is literally receding before our eyes,” the prime minister said.

“Working with others to support the possibility of a Palestinian state establishes that [prospect].”

Canadian governments previously said they would acknowledge a Palestinian state only after a negotiated peace agreement between Israel and Palestinian leadership. Carney said that approach was “no longer tenable.”

Carney said the ongoing threat of Hamas, the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank and “the ongoing failure by the Israeli government to prevent the rapidly deteriorating humanitarian disaster in Gaza” spurred Canada to make this move now.

Israel rejects Canada’s plans

The Israeli Foreign Ministry said its government “rejects” Carney’s move.

“The change in the position of the Canadian government at this time is a reward for Hamas and harms the efforts to achieve a ceasefire in Gaza and a framework for the release of the hostages,” the statement said.

Iddo Moed, the Israeli Ambassador to Canada, told Power & Politics that Canada’s decision would “embolden” Hamas.

“Hamas is very much aware of what is going on right now and I think they will be celebrating this very message,” Moed said.

Israel’s Ambassador to Canada Iddo Moed tells Power & Politics that Israel rejects Canada’s plans to recognize Palestinian sovereignty in September, saying it ‘rewards’ Hamas.

Noah Shack, CEO of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA), said in a news statement on Wednesday that Carney’s decision is “predicated on misplaced faith in vague commitments” by Abbas.

“Extending recognition absent real change on the ground is a recipe for another failed Palestinian pseudo-state controlled by terrorists,” Shack said.

More than 100 advocacy groups have been warning of hunger spreading in Gaza as ceasefire negotiations stall.

Israel, which controls all supplies entering Gaza, denies it is responsible for food shortages.

Carney was asked how likely it is that elections could be held given the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the heightened tensions in the region overall.

“Much has to happen in order for a democratic viable state [to be] established in Palestine. We fully recognize that,” Carney said.

“We’re committed to help work as part of that process, but I’m not in any way [or] shape minimizing the scale of that task.

Carney was joined by Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand, who announced $10 million “to accelerate reform and capacity-building for the Palestinian Authority” earlier this week.

Anand’s announcement was made at a major UN conference — convened by France and Saudi Arabia — to find ways to preserve the two-state solution.

Conservatives denounce decision

The Conservative Party said in a statement that it supports a two-state solution, but also said Carney’s decision is a “reward” for Hamas.

“A unilateral declaration of Palestinian statehood, without peace negotiations or a renunciation of violence, destroys the path to a lasting, two-state solution. Worse, it legitimizes terrorism by handing political rewards to a group that rules Gaza through fear, oppression and brutality,” the statement said.

NDP MP Heather McPherson said she welcomed Carney’s decision but said it should have been made sooner. She also called on Canada to do more to end the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

“It should not have taken the Liberals this long to make this decision — and it should not take until September to implement it,” McPherson wrote in a statement.

“The Liberals should recognize the state of Palestine today — while also taking the political action necessary to end Canada’s complicity in this genocide.”

[…]

Via https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/carney-canada-recognize-palestinian-state-conditions-1.7597525

Trump’s tariffs get frosty reception at federal appeals court

President Donald Trump initially imposed his “reciprocal” tariffs aimed at reducing the trade deficit in early April, but then paused the majority of them until Aug. 1. | Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

By Kyle Cheney and Doug Palmer07/31/2025 02:05 PM EDT

During a lengthy oral argument, judges were skeptical that Trump had the power to use an emergency law to enact the tariffs.

Federal appeals court judges on Thursday sharply questioned President Donald Trump’s authority to impose sweeping tariffs on foreign trading partners under an unprecedented use of emergency powers.

Several judges of the Washington, D.C.-based Federal Circuit Court of Appeals repeatedly wondered how Trump could justify the broad tariffs using a 1977 law known as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, that presidents have used to set economic sanctions and other penalties on foreign countries — but never previously tariffs.

“IEEPA doesn’t mention the word tariffs anywhere,” Judge Jimmie Reyna, an Obama appointee, said, calling that omission a major concern for him.

Judge Timothy Dyk, a Clinton appointee, said “it was hard for me to see” that Congress intended to give the president the authority to essentially rewrite the entire U.S. code when it passed the legislation.

The appeals court heard nearly two hours of oral arguments on a pair of lawsuits, each challenging tariffs imposed by Trump in a series of executive orders he signed between February and April. One case was brought by private companies; the other was brought by 11 Democratic-controlled states.

Some of the judges noted that large swaths of the nation’s complex and longstanding trade procedures would essentially become superfluous if the president could simply declare an emergency without review by courts — as the Trump administration contends — and impose tariffs of any size and duration. They also emphasized that tariffs imposed by President Richard Nixon under an older emergency power only survived legal challenges because they were targeted at a narrow problem and had a clear expiration date.

The New York-based U.S. Court of International Trade ruled in May that Trump had exceeded his authority under IEEPA to impose the tariffs and ordered them to be vacated. The Trump administration appealed that ruling to the Federal Circuit, which allowed the government to continue collecting the duties while the case proceeds. The appeals court set a rapid-fire schedule to consider the matter in front of the court’s full 11-member bench, which is made up of eight Democratic appointees, three Republican appointees and no Trump appointees.

The lawsuit is expected to end up at the Supreme Court.

Trump has used IEEPA to impose two primary sets of tariffs: one aimed at pressuring China, Canada and Mexico to stop the flow of fentanyl and precursor chemicals into the United States and another aimed at reducing the large U.S. trade deficit. Trump initially imposed his “reciprocal” tariffs aimed at reducing the trade deficit in early April, but then paused the majority of them until Aug. 1. He has, however, kept in place a 10-percent “baseline” tariff on all goods since April 5.

In recent weeks and months, Trump has negotiated a series of trade deals with countries, including the United Kingdom, Vietnam, Japan and the 27-nation European Union that have resulted in lower tariff rates than he announced in April. But he still plans to raise duties on those countries to between 15 and 20 percent beginning Friday, using IEEPA authorities.

Trump’s justification for the emergency tariffs is the nation’s longstanding and persistent trade deficits with foreign trading partners, which he says have become so acute they now threaten military readiness and America’s manufacturing capacity. He has also imposed a 50 percent tariff on Brazil, citing that country’s trial of former President Jair Bolsonaro, a former Trump ally, and free speech concerns, which the White House claims amounts to an emergency.

Both the states and the private companies argue the trade deficit is neither an “unusual or extraordinary” threat nor an “emergency,” since the United States has had one for decades. Both conditions are required under IEEPA for Trump to take action. The Justice Department disagrees, saying the trade deficit has been “exploding” in recent years, rising from $559 billion in 2019 to $903 billion in 2024.

Despite the court’s skepticism about Trump’s authority to impose tariffs under IEEPA, some judges suggested they might agree with Trump’s description of America’s trade deficit as an emergency. They said his executive order authorizing the tariffs described legitimate concerns about the effects of the deficit.

As the lawsuit has been pending, Trump has continued using his claimed tariff authority as leverage to negotiate trade deals with foreign partners and punish governments he says are acting counter to American interests. Justice Department attorney Brett Shumate told the judges that Trump’s use of the tariffs as a bargaining chip was an important aspect of his effort to deal with the emergency he described. Shumate cited the recently negotiated deal with the European Union as an example.

Even as Thursday’s hearing was underway, Trump announced he had reached an agreement with Mexico to forestall steeper tariffs amid complex negotiations about a long-term trade deal.

[…]

Via https://www.politico.com/news/2025/07/31/trump-tariff-arguments-appeals-court-00486972

Excavating the Ancient Kushite Tombs of Modern Day Sudan

Flooded Tombs of the Nile

Directed by Katie Bauer (2021)

Film Review

Historians have focused mainly on ancient Egyptian civilization because they had written language. In reality the kingdom of Kush (modern day north Sudan) constructed far more public monuments. Unfortunately many of them are underwater due to dam building that elevated the Nile’s water table.

For centuries the Kushites ruled the Nubian desert (modern day north Sudan) buried their kings in Napata near Nuri (at the Fourth cataract of the Nile). Kush became a very powerful kingdom owing to its control of all the trade routes to the Mediterranean and Asia. Some the most valuable commodities they controlled were ivory, animal skins, precious stones and gold.

Egypt eventually invaded Kush in 1450, ruling them for 400 years. They also imposed their religion on Kush, with the Kushites become far more devout than the Egyptians. As Egypt began to decline, Kush conquered Egypt in 752 BC and put Kushite pharaohs in the Egyptian throne for 100 years as the 25th Dynasty.

This documentary follows the 2018 excavation by a crew of underwater archeologists of the tomb of king Nastasen. He was the last Kushite king to build himself a burial pyramid. After 315 BC, the Kuhites moved their center of power away from Napata. In one way the flooding of the Kushite pyramids was a blessing. Ir protected these tombs from grave robbers. The latter carried off, not only gold and historical artifacts, but the mummies of many Egyptian pharaohs.

Other archeologists are doing a dig in the desert around the tomb, uncovering a town where workers lived while they worked on the tomb. So far they have found evidence of 10 separate neighborhoods, each dominated by a multistory building. Their most significant find so so far is a mud jar stopper stamped with a local official’s seal. The need for local officials to approve stores of food suggests a fairly complex economic system.

During the filming, the archeologists dive to collect mud from the third chamber of the under water pyramid. On returning to the surface, they strain through wire mesh on returning to the surface. So far they’ve retrieved shakti (miniature images of the king meant to assist him in the afterlife), gold foil which once covered the shakti, animal bones and charcoal from burnt offerings, and leather (Kushite mummies were wrapped in a hide mat).

They have also discovered an immovable stone slab in the middle of chamber three which they believe covers the king’s sarcophagus.

Türkiye, EU, Arab League, 16 countries endorse ‘New York Declaration’ supporting 2-state solution

Türkiye, EU, Arab League, 16 countries endorse 'New York Declaration' supporting 2-state solution

By Can Efesoy, Busranur Keskinkilic, Damla Delialioglu, Sumeyye Dilara Dincer and Beril Canakci  July 30 2025

The “New York Declaration,” launched Tuesday at a United Nations conference, reaffirmed support for a two-state solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict amid the rising famine and humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza following Israeli assaults.

Since Oct. 7, 2023, Israel’s offensive on Gaza has killed over 60,000 Palestinians. Relentless bombing has devastated the enclave, causing severe food shortages. At least 154 people, including 89 children, have died from starvation.

The declaration was issued at the conclusion of the High-Level International Conference on the Peaceful Settlement of the Palestinian Question and the Implementation of the Two-State Solution, held under the joint chairmanship of Saudi Arabia and France.

“We agreed to take collective action to end the war in Gaza, to achieve a just, peaceful, and lasting settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict based on the effective implementation of the two-state solution, and to build a better future for Palestinians, Israelis, and all peoples of the region,” the statement said.

According to the declaration, recent developments have “highlighted, once again, and more than ever, the terrifying human toll and the grave implications for regional and international peace and security” caused by the ongoing Middle East conflict.
It added that without “decisive measures towards the two-state solution and robust international guarantees, the conflict will deepen and regional peace will remain elusive.”

In comments made by Turkish officials at the meeting, the following statements were used: “Based on the decades-long Israeli record, handover of weapons by Palestinian armed groups should be closely conditioned to the realization of an independent, sovereign, and contiguous Palestinian state on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital or in accordance with an agreement reached among Palestinian groups as part of the reconciliation process.”

Türkiye, France, Saudi Arabia, Brazil, Canada, Egypt, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Mexico, Norway, Qatar, Senegal, Spain, the United Kingdom, the European Union, and the Arab League endorsed the declaration. 

The statement called for an immediate end to Israel’s war in Gaza, expressing support for efforts by Egypt, Qatar, and the United States to bring all parties back to the ceasefire agreement.

It emphasized the importance of implementing all phases of the agreement, including a permanent end to hostilities, the release of all hostages, the exchange of Palestinian prisoners, the return of all remains, and the full withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza.

Following the ceasefire, the declaration also suggested the establishment of a transitional administrative committee to operate in Gaza under the umbrella of the Palestinian Authority.

The statement reaffirmed that Gaza is “an integral part of a Palestinian state” and “must be unified” with the occupied West Bank. It emphasized that governance, law enforcement, and security across all Palestinian territories should fall solely under the authority of the Palestinian Authority, with appropriate international support.

The document also welcomed the Palestinian Authority’s “One State, One Government, One Law, One Gun” policy and pledged support for its implementation.

According to the declaration, this includes advancing a disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) process, to be carried out within a framework agreed upon with international partners and under a set timeframe.

The declaration reaffirmed support for a two-state solution based on the 1967 lines, with Israel and Palestine living side by side in peace and security. It backed the Palestinian right to self-determination and said full UN membership for Palestine is essential to any lasting political solution.

International legal action highlighted

The annex to the New York Declaration, summarizing proposals from participating states, calls for full cooperation with international legal bodies.

It urges ICC member states to support the court’s investigation into the situation in Palestine and encourages countries to join the genocide case filed by South Africa against Israel at the International Court of Justice.

Last November, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza.

Israel also faces a genocide case at the International Court of Justice for its war on the enclave.

[…]

Via https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/turkiye-eu-arab-league-16-countries-endorse-new-york-declaration-supporting-2-state-solution/3646558

40 EU legislators demand sanctions on Israel in response to Gaza atrocities

Palestinians carry aid supplies, which entered Gaza on trucks through Israel, in Beit Lahia, in the northern Gaza Strip, on July 29, 2025. (Photo by Reuters)

Dozens of members of the European Parliament (MEPs) from different political factions are calling on the politico-economic bloc to take “decisive” action and adopt punitive measures against Israel over the worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

A coalition of 40 cross-party legislators is urging the European Union to halt its trade deal with Israel and to impose sanctions on the cabinet of Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as a United Nations-supported organization raises alarms about indications of famine and extensive starvation in the Gaza Strip.

The lawmakers, in a joint statement, urged the 27-member union to hold the Tel Aviv regime responsible for actions that “blatantly breach the Geneva Convention and international humanitarian law.”

The statement also urges the Hamas resistance movement to immediately release Israeli captives.

“Future generations will judge today’s leaders on their response, or lack thereof, to the atrocities in Gaza. Failing to act now will be remembered as a moral stain on humanity,” the statement reads. “The time for moral cowardice is over, and action must be swift.”

The coalition of MEPs has made a clear demand for sanctions against Israel, a step that the EU has thus far refrained from taking, even as allies such as the United Kingdom and Norway have opted to impose sanctions on far-right Israeli security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and finance minister Bezalel Smotrich.

The 40 signatories are also urging the Commission to suspend the EU’s Association Agreement with Israel, which outlines the trading and political relations between the two parties, and which has frequently been promoted as the most effective instrument available to the EU for compelling Israel to improve the deteriorating humanitarian conditions in the Gaza Strip.

On Monday, the European Commission proposed a partial suspension of Israel’s access to the EU’s Horizon Europe research and innovation program due to its actions in Gaza.

However, the individuals who signed the statement are advocating for a significantly more rigorous response, cautioning that “mere words of condemnation are inadequate.”

They constitute 15 out of the 27 countries in the EU, which includes Germany, France, Italy, and Spain, along with six distinct political groups, ranging from The Left to the center-right European People’s Party (EPP).

“MEPs from across the spectrum of pro-European, pro-democratic parties have united behind this statement,” MEP Evin Incir, who sits on the center-left Socialists and Democrats (S&D) group, said.

She added that more signatories were expected to support the statement in the coming hours.

“Our concerns are directed at both the European Commission and EU member states, who all need to be more decisive in their response to the unfolding humanitarian crisis,” Incir noted.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2025/07/30/752117/40-EU-legislators-demand-sanctions-on-Israel-in-response-to-Gaza-atrocities