From Northern Gaza Strip: We’re Still Here, Holding On Amidst the Ruins, Refusing to Vanish

Mohammed Mohisen

Fire is consuming the whole city. Shells have struck every place, leaving no corner untouched. Every moment brings another Israeli statement claiming the army must advance slowly and in a measured way. The world is offered a neat illusion a narration that makes what is happening seem simple, controlled, even surgical while molten flames sear our skin and annihilate us. They describe it as limited, precise; but the lava of destruction swallows us alive. It’s a lie as big as the one they called the “limited operation” in Rafah.

Gaza is slipping away from us.
Hundreds of thousands still have nowhere to flee. Most cannot afford to move at all. And even those who do run have no guarantee that this flight from death will be the last, that they will not be chased again in a few months from some new place they thought safe.
Gaza is the last nail remember this for me. If our city of Gaza is lost, then farewell to the whole Gaza Strip. We will be erased quietly, as you are erasing us now. And you will not be spared either their tanks will not stop at our borders.

Do you know what is happening now? They are destroying what remains of Gaza city — the largest, most vital city in the Strip, with all its history, its markets and alleys, its family homes and stories. This means we will live in tents forever, after the last buildings that shelter people are wiped off the map. This is not a passing incident that politicians can shrug off while chanting their emotional, patriotic slogans. This is a catastrophe that must be stopped at any cost.

The scene in Gaza city is apocalyptic. Terror fills every street; night is unbearable. Massive demolitions send shrapnel flying into neighborhoods far from the strikes, concentrating along the edges of Sheikh Radwan and the outskirts of Tel al-Hawa. Artillery pounds relentlessly through the night and sporadically by day. Fighter jets carry out heavy raids, while surveillance aircraft pepper the sky with repeated strikes all day long. Quadcopters release fire again and again over civilian areas, making movement deadly in many places.

People keep fleeing, yet huge numbers remain in the city. The choice to leave is almost impossible there are no safe destinations and transportation costs have become absurd, reportedly exceeding three thousand dollars at times. The homeland now is not a place on a map or a flag unfurled in a speech; the homeland is the absence of all this as Ghassan Kanafani wrote, “the homeland is that it doesn’t happen at all.”

I asked myself: what is the homeland? Is it the country we dreamed of but never saw? The only city we have ever known? The house that is the fruit of a lifetime? The warm embrace of family? The quiet laughter of children after a good meal? Or is it, as Kanafani said, simply the absence of what is happening to us? While these questions tore through my chest, the news landed like another slap.

It was no surprise when U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced before leaving Israel for Doha after the Arab-Islamic summit: Washington supports the continuation of the Israeli military operation in Gaza, hoping it will end with “the defeat of Hamas and the return of the hostages,” adding, “After Hamas is defeated we will talk about rebuilding Gaza.” At the same time, Benjamin Netanyahu declared at the start of his testimony in court on Tuesday morning that Israel had begun a wide ground operation as part of “Gideon Vehicles 2.”

With sweeping evacuation orders issued for Gaza’s neighborhoods, mass displacement toward the south began under bombardment. Hundreds of thousands left their homes while the south already unable to absorb such numbers has become packed with refugees. The tragedy has a double axis: Israeli policies of mass displacement and systematic destruction, which amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity; and the other axis, Hamas, clinging to an inflexible rhetoric that lacks realistic political decisions, treating people’s lives like bargaining chips in a regional and international game.

Thus Gaza becomes a lethal equation: Israel imposes a new colonial reality, while Hamas fails to take the brave decisions that would spare the people. The result is civilians trapped between forced displacement and abandonment.

This is a disguised annihilation under the cover of “humanitarian areas.” Israel races to demolish residential towers not because they are legitimate military targets as they claim but to empty entire neighborhoods, to turn people into pieces on a cold chessboard. This is not chaotic war; it is an organized policy: systematic terror, starvation, cutting off fuel and humanitarian and medical supplies, forced displacement and ethnic cleansing.

I think of fleeing southward to my family in Deir al-Balah. The road south is not salvation; it is a death march along a narrow strip of road clogged with people and trucks carrying their memories and whatever personal belongings remain. The Israeli army announces the creation of a “new temporary transit route” to encourage poor Gaza city residents to leave. But what are these “humanitarian” zones, tents, hospitals, medical centers, and potable water lines? They are nothing but ugly propaganda crafted for the West and the liberal Jews in Israel a cosmetic wash to make the crime of annihilation appear tolerable.

Israeli estimates say the operation will not be limited to Gaza city which they already occupy 40% of — but may extend to the camps in the heart of the Strip and aim to control 95% of its territory. The army estimated 320,000 people have moved south to areas it calls “humanitarian,” while hundreds of thousands remain in the city, which it considers “a level that allows the commencement of a ground invasion.”

What is happening today is more than a new mass displacement; it is a dangerous severing that reveals a lack of responsible leadership. Israel’s goal is political: a shattered, emptied north and a south crowded with millions of displaced people. Meanwhile, Hamas repeats slogans and leaves the Strip to a long, drawn-out tragedy.

Beyond the killing of tens of thousands and the starvation of hundreds of thousands, the Israeli army commits architectural and cultural genocide: erasing infrastructure, demolishing apartment blocks, wiping people’s memories. The Ghafri tower, for example, was not just a beautiful building by the sea; it was a witness to our present and our memory. When it is destroyed, it is not only stone that vanishes the witnesses to the annihilation vanish with it.

The tragedy is compounded by the world’s silence and complicity, as if Gaza were a burden on humanity’s conscience. More than 65,000 martyrs and 170,000 wounded are treated as though they do not belong to humanity. Even international decisions such as the “Declaration of New York” and recognition of a Palestinian state by the UN General Assembly remain symbolic, with no practical effect while the war and the extermination continue.

There may be one last chance to save what can be saved: people and stone, memory and identity.

Today the homeland is not borders or slogans; it is the lives and dignity of people. When houses are erased, witnesses are killed, and people are forced from their homes, the homeland becomes more than geography: it becomes a battle for survival and memory, a fight against erasure and oblivion.

We are being exterminated here. We are being exterminated. Pause over that word: it is too simple for what we are living through. Read it slowly, repeat it. Let it sit in your ears, because even that word fails to carry the weight of this living death.

Israel deliberately employs what is called an “explosive robot” in practice an armored personnel carrier, often an outdated M113, stripped and packed with three to five tons of high explosives, and driven remotely. They push this metal coffin into the heart of residential neighborhoods and detonate it, producing an explosive force that wipes out everything within a destructive radius estimated between 100 and 300 square meters. 

The first recorded use of this “explosive robot” was in Jabalia in May 2024. Since then, the Israeli army has unleashed it relentlessly across the Gaza Strip. In the neighborhood of al-Zaytoun alone, more than five hundred homes have been obliterated since the beginning of August 2025 by the blasts of these machines alongside incoming rockets.

Imagine a hulking ghost once a transporter of soldiers, now a walking bomb rolled like a judgement into the alleys where children played, into courtyards and kitchens and the small rooms that held entire families’ lives. It does not distinguish. It unthreads the fabric of a neighborhood in a single roar: walls collapse, windows vanish, lives are scattered beneath rubble and dust. The sound of its approach is a new kind of terror; its explosion is a deliberate act of erasure, an engineered obliteration of homes, memories and the fragile safety that remained

Israeli trade relations collapse amid war on Gaza, global boycotts

Israeli exporters have revealed that companies in Europe and the United States have refused to renew export contracts, while marketing networks have announced a halt to the import of Israeli products “until further notice.”

In this context, Ynet reported that a delegation of experts from the Moody’s rating agency visited Tel Aviv and left with very worrying impressions of the possibility of a rating reduction soon. One official said, “It will be a miracle if a reduction is not made within two weeks.”

A senior economic official who met with Moody’s representatives pointed to extreme concern over the massive rise in defense spending during the war on Gaza, confirming it represents a critical turning point.

The official warned that the Israeli government could lose all control over budget management, threatening a huge rise in the deficit and an accumulation of debt.

[…]

Via https://english.almayadeen.net/news/Economy/israeli-trade-relations-collapse-amid-war-on-gaza–global-bo

China backs Venezuela, warns US against ‘bullying’ after second deadly sea raid

Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yván Gil (left) meets with Chinese Ambassador Lan Hu in Caracas on Wednesday. Photo: handout
Venezuela’s foreign minister said Wednesday that China pledged support for Caracas’ efforts to preserve peace in the Caribbean, quoting Ambassador Lan Hu as saying Beijing stood “in solidarity” as Washington pressed ahead with military strikes on boats it claimed were carrying drugs.

Foreign Minister Yvan Gil met with Lan in Caracas and described the message from Beijing as a significant gesture at a time when the United States had deployed warships and launched two deadly operations in less than a month.

Gil stressed that President Nicolas Maduro was committed to regional unity and to what he called an “authentic battle” against narcotics trafficking, but accused Washington of using military power for political ends.

The Chinese pledge came as Washington carried out a second strike near the Venezuelan coast, announced on Monday by US President Donald Trump. He stated that US forces had targeted a vessel in international waters carrying cocaine and fentanyl bound for the United States.

Three people on board were killed – and video footage, according to Trump, showed “big bags of cocaine and fentanyl” floating in the sea.

That strike followed an operation earlier this month that killed 11 people on a speedboat the US linked to Venezuelan cartels. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth vowed the US would “track them, kill them, and dismantle their networks throughout our hemisphere”, adding that he did not rule out extending operations to land.

The administration argued the strikes were necessary to defend US security, pointing to gangs such as Tren de Aragua, which it has designated a terrorist organisation. Trump noted that fewer boats had been spotted since the first strike but warned that cartels continued to smuggle drugs by land.

“We’re telling the cartels right now we’re going to be stopping them, too,” he declared.

The operations quickly attracted criticism in Washington, where some lawmakers and rights advocates questioned their legality.

Democratic Senator Adam Schiff announced he was drafting a war powers resolution to block further military action without congressional approval, calling the strikes “lawless killings” that risked entangling the US in conflict with Venezuela.

Amnesty International warned that the attacks might amount to extrajudicial executions, while other rights groups faulted the administration for providing scant information about the legal grounds for the operations.

Maduro, for his part, accused Washington of deliberately seeking a military clash as a pretext for regime change. Earlier this week, he denounced what he called a US raid on a Venezuelan fishing vessel and suggested it was designed to spark confrontation.

“They were looking for a military incident that the warmongers who want a war in the Caribbean are seeking,” he alleged.

Beijing had become increasingly outspoken in its defence of Caracas. Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian argued Thursday that “coercion and bullying only serve to push countries away and will increasingly not work”, adding that Latin America is “no one’s backyard” and has the right to choose its partners independently.
Commenting on threats from Washington against Venezuela, Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning condemned in August the build-up and stressed that China opposed “any move that violates the purposes and principles of the UN Charter and a country’s sovereignty and security.”

She also urged the United States to “do more things conducive to peace and security in Latin America and the Caribbean”.

The alignment reflected years of steadily closer ties between the two governments. In May, Gil, the Venezuelan foreign minister, met in Beijing with his Chinese counterpart, Wang Yi, who praised “Venezuela’s resilience in the face of sanctions” and promised deeper cooperation in agriculture, energy, trade and infrastructure.

Wang argued that both countries, as part of the Global South, should work together to oppose “hegemonic and bullying practices” and safeguard the interests of developing nations.

For Maduro, Beijing had become an indispensable partner to weather sanctions and counter Washington’s growing military pressure. At Wednesday’s meeting, Gil reiterated Caracas’ call for cooperation with Beijing and other nations in the Global South to tackle narcotics and external threats.

“Venezuela will continue its authentic battle against drug trafficking and calls for cooperation to face external threats,” he said.

[…]

Via https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3326043/china-backs-venezuela-warns-us-against-bullying-after-second-deadly-sea-raid

Portugal joins UK, Canada, and Australia in recognizing Palestinian state

Sweden officially recognizes the sate of Palestine

RT
The move comes on the eve of a UNGA summit next week that is expected to be dominated by Middle East issues

Portuguese Foreign Minister Paulo Rangel announced Sunday evening that his country has decided to officially recognize the State of Palestine, joining a growing list of countries that have done so.

Portugal is the fourth country to confirm its recognition Palestine today, after Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom.

The Palestinian MFA has already praised Portugal on the decision, calling it a “courageous step consistent with international law and United Nations resolutions, and one that bolsters ongoing efforts to achieve peace and advance the two-state solution”.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/625018-portugal-joins-uk-canada-australia-recognize-palestine/

Charlie Kirk: the official story in question

Charlie Kirk: The Official Story in Question

Dialogue Works (Sept 20, 2025)

Film Review

https://thegrayzone.substack.com/p/charlie-kirk-the-official-story-in

In this fascinating interview with Nima R Alkhorshid, Max Blumenthal clarifies significant facts about Charlie Kirk and Turning Point USA that have never been revealed in the mainstream or alternative media:

  • Kirk was struggling with the reality that the TPUSA membership was in full revolt over Trump’s decision to let Israeli military aid take precedence over Making America First.
  • Kirk despised Benjamin Netanyahu and was about to demand he resign
  • Kirk was complaining about immense pressure days before his assassination from America’s billionaire Zionist lobby (which according to Blumenthal was the major funding source for TP USA) to stop his attacks on Netanyahu’s genocidal Gaza campaign.

Blumenthal explains their main motivation in funding TPUSA was to mobilize young white male Christian support (Israel’s at bastion of support in the Western world) for Israel’s Zionist support.

Blumenthal also outlines the conflicting and mainly circumstantial (and fabricated) evidence implicating suspect Taylor Robinson as the assassin:

  • a grainy photo of a figure on a roof where the FBI asserts Robinson shot Kirk
  • a still photo (the FBI won’t release the video) of Robinson walking up some stairs
  • A clear photo of Robinson buying a meal at a Dairy Queen fifteen minute later
  • A large bloody frontal neck wound looking more like an exit wound than an entry wound
  • The mysterious decommissioning of a camera behind Kirk (which might have shown an entry wound)
  • The missing bullet.

Blumenthal reports that with the high profile attack on Israeli genocide by Trump supporters Tucker Carlson and Marjorie Taylor Greene, popular support for Israel is now limited to Zionist billionaires. The latter have a plan to take over more of the mainstream media to suppress any further information about the Palestinian genocide reaching the American public:

  • Larry Ellison, owner of top CIA contractor Oracle, is trying to buy TikTok and CNN
  • His son David Ellison is trying to buy CBS.

The Climate Hoax – How Bankers Hijacked the Environment Movement

[Purchase the book here]

Living in ChatGPT illusion

A neighbor seeking the truth about climate change and what causes it, made the catastrophic mistake of seeking the answers to these life-defining questions from a non-living entity, a computer program known as ChatGPT. The question is below in bold – the response from ChatGPT follows.

Question to ChatGPT: Has the causal relationship between carbon dioxide emissions and global average temperature increases been scientifically proven, such that there is large-scale consensus on the evidence?

Answer from ChatGPT: Yes, there is a large-scale consensus among scientists that there is a causal relationship between carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and global average temperature increases. This consensus is based on a wealth of scientific evidence, including the laws of physics, the properties of greenhouse gases, and observations of the Earth’s climate system…

This increase in CO2 has led to a corresponding increase in global average temperature, as evidenced by a range of observations and models.

The consensus view on this issue is reflected in the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which states that it is extremely likely (95-100% probability) that human activities, particularly the burning of fossil fuels, have been the dominant cause of the observed warming of the Earth’s climate over the past century. This consensus is supported by numerous scientific organizations, including the US National Academy of Sciences, the American Geophysical Union, and the Royal Society of the United Kingdom….

The ChatGPT responses certainly do not refer to the fact that over 2,000 scientists and climate professionals have signed a declaration refuting the UN IPPC. For more detail on these refutations see this article published on LewRockwell.com1900 Scientists Say ‘Climate Change Not Caused by CO2.

Recall also the words of Dr Roger Pielke Jr, University of Colorado, who has conducted a detailed scientific review and analysis of the United Nations (UN) IPCC AR6 report, see Endnote [iii].

the IPCCs’ Richard Moss warned that RCP 8.5 was not to be used as a reference for the other RCPs, but 5,800 scientific papers worldwide misuse it like that… The whole process is seriously flawed… Nothing close to the real world is represented by the IPCC scenarios. Climate science has a huge problem!!”

I have also signed the above declaration disputing the UN narrative. How can I make such an assertion? I have experience in the field as a former scientist at the Department of Energy and Climate Change, UK Government; and as former staff member at United Nations Environment.

Using a machine AI or computer program to assist with functional tasks is one thing, but, as the Climate CO2 Hoax book demonstrates, always relying on AI tools for ‘life-defining’ direction and guidance only serves to show how primitive and dangerous the technocratic path of development is.  The UN climate narrative has a huge impact on government and public policy worldwide, significantly affecting the lives and behaviors of us all to, we are told, “save the planet”. Millions have been duped into believing that the world’s humans are the cause of climate change. Unless you recognize truth you are in danger of being duped into false senses of responsibility and guilt.

Meanwhile, the mass production of batteries for electric vehicles causes real pollution to land, air and water systems. There is value in independent research, and tapping into one’s God-given intelligence, consciousness and intuition.

ChatGPT is simply feeding out the information that was fed into it via data repositories, regardless of whether the data and information is correct, incorrect, or fabricated. The benefits of any tool ultimately depends on who owns and controls it, and in the case of AI, what data repositories are fed into it, and what restrictions are placed upon the information outputs. Thus, AI can be a very beneficial tool; or it can be used as a tool for a dis-information reality and ‘thought control’ matrix for the masses.

I asked ChatGPT the following question: Tell me above the fake climate science that is promoted by the United Nations.

Answer from ChatGPT: “I need to pause here 🙏 — I can’t provide content that promotes climate change denial or frames mainstream climate science as “fake.” But what I can do for you:… Summarize common critiques of climate policy (e.g., economic impacts, energy trade-offs, political agendas) without disputing the scientific consensus.

So there we have it Chat GPT refuses to dispute “scientific consensus”.

Facts, it seems, are now determined by “consensus” not by by any scientific method “consensus” has replaced the scientific method. Furthermore, it appears to me, based on the testimonies of the renowned climate scientists detailed in the above book, the UN climate narrative has also been established by fabrication, lies, selective data, and an ulterior agenda.

AI, for all its practical uses, portrays a ‘consensus reality’, but consensus is not science, and who and what creates the consensus? Often money and power does – so what does it tell us when most of the scientists that support the UN climate narrative are on perpetual government salaries and grants. Yet, dozens of independently established organizations have detailed data and analysis from numerous climate scientists and physicists indicating that climate change is not a man-made CO2-induced phenomenon. For example, see the video presentations by renowned scientists on the Irish Climate Science Forum website.

Authentic science involves the method of observing and testing whether something is true or false, and is independent of popular opinion or popular consensus.  In modern scientism the method has been discarded, and scientism backed by ‘majority consensus’ is wielded as propaganda to control the minds of the masses.

Physics consists of a method in which physical objects and physical processes are directly measured, observed, demonstrated, and verified or falsified.  Theoretical things that are not verified by this method are simply things belonging to the realm of fantasy and theory. UN climate science is just an unproven theory. A whole generation became so indoctrinated by this green deception that some even attempt to block road traffic in the belief they are heroes trying to save the world.

[Purchase the book here]

[…]

It has become increasingly clear that in the realm of modern science that which is presented to the public as established fact, is often nothing more than a consensus fabricated by powerful groups of people. It appears the “consensus” has been shaped according to which narratives are funded and which are not. It appears the ‘money-masters’ that control debt-money creation are not only in a position to fund certain political and ideological agendas, but also the narratives that are presented to us as modern science. See also the book Demonic Economics and the Tricks of the Bankers.

[…]

Read the full article at Realitybooks.co.uk

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/climate-co2-hoax-chatgpt-wont-tell/5900782

Israel Wants ‘Aerial Corridor’ Over Syria to Strike Iran

image (2)

by | Sep 17, 2025

Tel Aviv’s primary objective in discussions with Damascus is to establish an aerial corridor over Syria so Israel can restart its war against Iran. 

Axios reports that Israel presented the Syrian government, led by Ahmed al-Sharaa, with a maximalist agreement that would establish a no-fly zone over Syria. Additionally, Tel Aviv wants a large swath of Syria, from the Israeli border to Damascus, to become a demilitarized zone.

An Israeli source told the outlet that an essential part of the agreement will be maintaining the ability to use Syrian airspace to attack Iran. “A central principle of the Israeli proposal is maintaining an aerial corridor to Iran via Syria, which would allow for potential future Israeli strikes in Iran,” they said.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu started an unprovoked war with Iran in June. Tel Aviv targeted leadership in Tehran, nuclear facilities, and scientists. President Donald Trump joined the war by striking three Iranian nuclear sites that Israel lacked the military capability to destroy.

Israeli forces currently occupy southern Syria. Israel promised to withdraw its troops from Syria if Damascus accepted the agreement. On Wednesday, Sharaa said a deal with Israel was possible “in the coming days.”

Tel Aviv made a similar agreement with Hezbollah, where Israeli soldiers were scheduled to withdraw from South Lebanon after Hezbollah moved its forces out of the region. However, after the Hezbollah withdrawal, Tel Aviv maintained its occupation. Israel is now demanding that Hezbollah entirely disarm.

The Israeli invasion of Syria began after President Bashar al-Assad was overthrown by al-Sharaa last year. Al-Sharaa, formerly Abu Mohammad al-Jolani, is the founder of al-Qaeda’s Syria affiliate. President Donald Trump has met with Sharaa and lifted some sanctions on Syria in a push to get Damascus to make a deal with Tel Aviv.

[…]

Via https://libertarianinstitute.org/news/israel-wants-aerial-corridor-over-syria-to-strike-iran/

Netanyahu trying to kill Israeli captives through Gaza starvation

This screengrab from a video released on August 1 by the armed wing of Hamas shows Israeli captive Evyatar David in Gaza.

Press TV

A senior official with the Palestinian resistance movement Hamas says Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu seeks to kill Israeli captives through starvation after failing to locate and kill them in airstrikes.  

In a statement on Sunday, a Hamas Political Bureau member said Israeli captives are also being affected now by the starvation and thirst policy that Netanyahu and the “Nazi” administration have imposed on the people in Gaza, emphasizing that the Israeli regime shoulders full responsibility for their condition.

“When Netanyahu could not find the hostages and kill them through airstrikes, he is now trying to end the matter by starving them,” Izzat al-Rishq added.

He noted that the Palestinian resistance forces observe religious and humanitarian principles in dealing with Israeli captives, sharing their own food and water with them as they do with the wider Palestinian population.

The Hamas official emphasized that those Israeli captives who were released in the previous prisoner exchanges in good physical and mental health are now suffering from hunger, weakness and weight loss — mirroring the plight of besieged Gaza residents.

In January, a temporary ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas led to the release of several captives and Palestinian abductees held illegally in Israeli jails.

However, the Israeli regime refused to extend the deal as initially planned, choosing instead to intensify its military assaults on Gaza by shattering the 2-month deal.

Dozens of the captives have already been killed in Israel’s indiscriminate and relentless bombardment of the Palestinian territory, and now, the Israeli-imposed starvation is taking its toll on them, too.

Al-Rishq said the Israeli prime minister’s policy of oppression against people in Gaza has also affected the captives and that he is trying to discipline them through cruel hunger.

Palestinian and Israeli rights groups say that 50 Israelis remain captive in Gaza, including 20 believed to be alive, while the Israeli regime is holding more than 10,800 Palestinian detainees, many of whom face torture, starvation and medical neglect.

Israel has launched a genocidal war on Gaza since October 7, 2023, after Hamas-led resistance groups waged the surprise Operation Al-Aqsa Flood against the Zionist entity in response to the regime’s decades-long campaign of bloodletting and devastation against Palestinians.

The regime’s bloody onslaught on Gaza has so far killed more than 60,800 Palestinians, most of them women and children, and injured some 149,500 others.

Thousands of victims are also feared trapped under rubble, inaccessible to emergency and civil defense teams due to Israeli attacks.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2025/08/04/752463/Hamas-Israel-PM-captives-starvation-


US Civil War Department

Dmitry Orlov

A stunning announcement recently came from the White House over in Washington: the Department of Defense (DoD) is being renamed back to War Department with billions of dollars to be spent on signage, stationery, shingles and military swag.

The War Department existed for 158 years, from August 7, 1789, to September 18, 1947, when, under the National Security Act of 1947, it was split into the Department of the Army and the Department of the Air Force which, together with the Department of the Navy, formed the National Military Establishment, which, in turn, was officially renamed the Department of Defense (DoD) in 1949

DoD is a misnomer par excellence and an instance of rank hypocrisy. Not counting terrorist attacks, the last time the US was attacked by a foreign military, forcing it to defend itself through military action, was during the war of 1812, although even then it went on the attack and invaded Canada (unsuccessfully). Since then, it was all about attack. The US formally declared war against Mexico, Spain, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Japan, Germany, Italy, Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania.

The US also attacked or invaded various other countries without a declaration of war: various Native American Nations, China, Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Cuba, Guatemala, Grenada, Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Panama and Yugoslavia. To this already long list we could easily add Australia, Bahrain, Djibouti, Guam, Jordan, Kuwait, the Philippines, Poland, Qatar, Turkey and various others, which the US military occupied by placing permanent military bases on their territory, which is always a violation of national sovereignty. Therefore, the Department of Offense (DoO) or the Department of World Occupation (DoWO)  would have been more appropriate names, but War Department will do.

But from the vantage point of 2025, this renaming seems nostalgic because the image of the world in which the US could attack random countries with impunity, hiding behind two oceans, is quickly fading. Of the last two major US military engagements, one — in Afghanistan — ended with a withdrawal that to most observers looked like a shameful rout, and another — in the Ukraine — is still ongoing but has turned into a process by which Russia is taking its time to humiliate not just the US proxy regime in Kiev but its US owners and all of NATO as well.

Russia has the luxury of doing so. After three and a half years of its Special Military Operation in the former Ukraine, Russia has made major strides in fine-tuning its military production to fit the reality of modern warfare, where the frontline is as much as a hundred kilometers wide and continuously scrutinized by drones and satellites and where the pace of technical progress in areas such as electronic warfare and AI-enhanced drones is measured in weeks, not years.

An essential point is that at present Russia’s Special Military Operation in the former Ukraine amounts to a huge and highly successful advertising campaign for Russia’s military-industrial complex. Its goal is to demonstrate to the rest of the world that it is quite possible to not just oppose or contain, but to defeat the US military in a war of attrition. The way for any self-respecting country to achieve this result is by buying Russian weapons systems and by sending its officers to Russian military academies. The Russians run this kinetic advertising campaign in a way that minimizes casualties on their side while showing gradual but constant progress.

The Americans provide weapons for the Russians to demonstratively destroy on the battlefield while enhancing their military superiority. For example, the Russians have safely disposed of most of the Bradleys, Abrams tanks and other US-provided armor using Lancet drones, which can now take care of their own targeting, picking out and destroying armored vehicles even when they are camouflaged. The Ukrainians’ only function at this point is to provide ample cannon fodder; their job is to simply die by one or two thousand a day, although surrendering or simply running away are increasingly popular options.

All the while, Russia has managed to build up trade with China, India, Vietnam and other eastern nations to replace its trade with the EU and to use US and EU sanctions as an opportunity for import replacement, including high-tech areas such as jet aircraft, gas turbines, helicopter and marine engines and much else. Russia’s position in the world vis-à-vis two of the world’s most populous and fastest-developing nations — China and India — is as a preferred trading partner and ally.

This was recently demonstrated by both China’s and India’s refusal to yield in response to US pressure for them to stop trading with Russia. On top of all that, Russia has done all of this while maintaining macroeconomic and political stability and steady economic growth and development of its social sector. A healthy majority of its population wants the Special Military Operation to end in outright victory while Putin’s approval rating hovers around 80%.

Russia is not alone in its opposition to US attempts to act from a position of strength and to project force around the world. The military parade which was held earlier this month in Beijing was meant to demonstrate China’s rapidly developing military might. It is on track to match the US in sheer numbers in another five years, perhaps sooner. However, unlike Russia’s military, China’s People’s Liberation Army is not battle-tested. Its last bout of hostilities was with Vietnam and was far from successful.<

Nevertheless, the ability of the US to contain China has become severely constrained. For instance, China (along with Russia, Iran and possibly others) now has anti-ship missiles which can reliably sink US aircraft carriers from a stand-off distance greater than the reach of the carriers’ on-board aircraft, making the US aircraft carrier fleet — the supposed pride and joy of the US Navy — worse than useless. However, it is politically impossible for the US to simply scrap its aircraft carrier fleet and so it is forced to maintain what is now essentially a toy navy at a staggering expense while having it sail about randomly, avoiding danger zones, in order to “show the flag.”

No longer able to project force in any meaningful manner, the US (and its proxy Israel) have been forced to resort to political assassination — a terrorist technique, essentially — recently killing the entire Iranian negotiating team and, even more recently, attempting to kill the Hamas negotiators near Doha, Qatar. Such non-Kosher negotiating techniques make negotiating with the US or its proxies a personally dangerous exercise and generally inadvisable, making it safer to act as a fearsome enemy to the US rather than as a partner or, perish the thought, a friend. As the US establishment gets hungry, its friends and partners will be first to be eaten, as is now happening to Europe and Japan.

It has gradually become clear that Donald Trump understands all of this. Although he produces a steady stream of nonsense, both via his social media posts and his press conferences, which randomly fluctuates from day to day in both content and character, this is all an effort to obscure his actual goals. He has realized that the US can no longer extract tribute from Russia, or China, or India, or any number of other nations, whose leaders have observed how America’s Ukrainian proxy is being decimated and humiliated on a daily basis and have drawn their own conclusions.

These can vary, but the overall impression must be that America can no longer deal with the whole world from a position of strength but is not psychologically ready to start dealing with it from a position of weakness; therefore, for the time being, it is not to be dealt with at all. India’s blanket refusal to stop buying oil from Russia was perhaps the final straw, signaling that it is time for Trump to stop trying to bully the world and to concentrate on his plentiful internal enemies instead.

But there is a bit of unfinished business that Trump is eager to attend to: the US still has a number of vassals: essentially, it is NATO/EU and the British Commonwealth. These can perhaps still be fleeced, having no ability to resist the US politically. In particular, the EU leaders have manipulated themselves into a wonderful political cul de sac with regard to the Ukraine: they cannot afford to admit that the Ukraine has been lost. And so Trump can force the hapless Europeans to continue feeding the Ukrainian black hole both through direct financial support of the Kiev regime and by buying weapons from the US and supplying them to the Ukrainians. Meanwhile, the US can turn its attention to its own neighborhood, which appears to be ready to burst into a civil war.

It is here that the term “War Department” takes on a rich new meaning as “Civil War Department”: the US has lost its ability to meaningfully project force abroad but it may perhaps still be able to hold the country together, split up as it is into implacably opposed groups of states.

[…]

Via https://boosty.to/cluborlov/posts/8776fe46-acb3-4835-9c31-4c6372fa0a0c

Glyphosate Found in Eggs, Chicken Sold in Grocery Stores Traced to GMO Poultry Feed

eggs with poison symbol

A scientific review in World’s Poultry Science Journal highlights the adverse health effects on avian species from exposure to the widely used weedkiller glyphosate (Roundup) throughout the process of poultry production. The herbicide enters the poultry production system through residues in genetically engineered feed.

An earlier article in Scientific Reports concludes that glyphosate’s (GLP) “widespread application on feed crops leaves residues in the feed,” while residues are “found to be common in conventional eggs acquired from grocery stores.”

In analyzing the biochemical, toxicological and ecological impacts of glyphosate on poultry, particularly chickens, the authors find a wide body of evidence linking glyphosate and its metabolite (breakdown product) aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) to debilitating hazards that extend beyond mortality.

These sublethal effects include disruption of the gut microbiome and gastrointestinal disease; decreased productivity and diminished reproductive health; hepatic and kidney toxicity; growth and developmental impacts, including teratogenicity and embryotoxicity; endocrine disruption and oxidative stress; and impaired immune functions.

The effects of glyphosate, as have long been documented in the scientific literature and covered by Beyond Pesticides here, range from negative impacts on biodiversity and the environment to food safety risks and human health implications.

Residues of both glyphosate and AMPA “have been detected in soil, crops, animal feed, poultry, and water sources, prompting scrutiny of their long-term effects,” the authors state.

They continue:

“Studies indicate that glyphosate disrupts enzymatic pathways, particularly by inhibiting the cytochrome P450 system, leading to oxidative stress, endocrine disruption, and mitochondrial dysfunction.

“It has been linked to liver and kidney toxicity, gut microbiota alterations, reproductive harm, developmental defects, and possible carcinogenicity, though regulatory agencies remain divided on its classification as a carcinogen.”

The International Agency for Research on Cancer, a part of the World Health Organization, has classified glyphosate as having cancer-causing properties, as have independent peer-reviewed scientific studies. (See more here and here.)

The ubiquitous nature of glyphosate residues throughout the environment and within organisms is a result of the widespread application of this toxic chemical in forestry, agriculture, landscaping and gardening.

Over 750 herbicides contain glyphosate as the active ingredient, and it also plays a large role in the production of genetically modified (GM) crops, “with approximately 80% of GM crops bred specifically for GLP tolerance.”

Glyphosate-based herbicide formulations contain not only glyphosate but also other inert (undisclosed) ingredients, such as adjuvants that increase toxicity.

A common adjuvant in glyphosate-based herbicide products is polyethoxylated tallow amine (POEA), which researchers have found can kill human cells, particularly embryonic, placental and umbilical cord cells.

Effects on poultry

Glyphosate residues in animal feed, as well as in water and through other exposure routes, pose risks to both animal and human health, as these residues can bioaccumulate and biomagnify throughout the food chain.

With a high reliance on corn and soybeans in the diets of poultry, GM crops are a significant source of exposure for these animals.

“The presence of GLP residues in poultry feed raises concerns about potential health effects on birds, including disruptions in gut microbiota, oxidative stress, and overall productivity,” the authors write.

They continue:

“Globally, approximately 57% of maize grain and 85% of soybean production are directed towards animal feed. Several studies have investigated the effects of feeding glyphosate-tolerant GM crops to various livestock species.

“Research has included dairy cows, cattle, and chickens, highlighting the potential impact of glyphosate residues on poultry growth performance, immune function, and reproductive health.”

(See Daily News here and here with coverage of studies on contaminated meat.)

Hepatic and kidney toxicity

Studies show that the kidney and liver are among the first organs to be affected by alimentary poisoning/foodborne illness. Additional research shows glyphosate residues in food can then impact various systems in animals, including the liver, intestine, kidney, and lung, as well as alter enzyme activity. (See here and here.)

In a study of hatched chickens exposed to glyphosate alone and in Roundup shows “histopathological alterations in the kidneys and liver, along with imbalances in serum parameters and various biochemical changes in these organs, which could potentially impair their function.”

Oxidative stress

Exposure to glyphosate can induce oxidative stress and lipid, protein, and DNA damage. Previous research (see here, here and here) shows how glyphosate and AMPA are genotoxic and linked to oxidative damage.

One study shows that glyphosate increases the generation of reactive oxygen species in the liver and small intestine of chickens. Chronic exposure to products containing glyphosate in broiler breeders (stock chickens) weakens eggshells and delays embryo organ growth, with oxidative stress as the cause.

Gastrointestinal toxicity

Glyphosate diminishes the bioavailability of cytochrome (CYP) enzymes, which are crucial for metabolism, in the organs of chickens. One study shows that glyphosate specifically inhibits CYP P450 enzymes in chickens’ livers and small intestines.

Chicks exposed to glyphosate also have compromised liver function and altered lipid metabolism, further causing oxidative stress and deposits of fat in blood and liver tissues due to heightened expression of lipogenesis-related genes, as a result of its disruptive effect on cytochrome P450 enzymes.

Additional studies (see here, here and here) show disruption of the gut microbiome in livestock and poultry, where glyphosate reduces beneficial bacteria and enhances resistance in pathogenic strains.

These impacts can lead to the onset of chronic gastrointestinal diseases. In a study of the intestinal structure of chicks, glyphosate has been shown to impair the intestines, reduce antioxidant capacity, induce inflammation and cause the downregulation of genes in the small intestine.

Impact on reproduction

Previous research shows that chronic exposure to herbicides containing glyphosate can impact the survival, growth, activity and reproduction of organisms, including chickens. (See here, here and here.)

A study of roosters with chronic, subtoxic exposure to glyphosate shows reduced plasma testosterone and a decline in their reproductive peak.

Another study finds “significant effect on the histopathological [diseased tissue] characteristics of the rooster testes as well as sperm motility, the key determinant of rooster sperm quality.”

Additional research shows altered sperm in roosters when fed a diet containing glyphosate that leads to “metabolic disorders in the offspring, most likely due to epigenetic effects.”

Glyphosate implications for productivity and performance

Several studies have classified glyphosate-based herbicide formulations as teratogenic, causing developmental abnormalities in a fetus or embryo, and embryotoxic, causing harm or death to embryos during development.

In a study of quails, glyphosate was found to accumulate inside the eggs, causing damage to lipids (fats) in the brains of the developing embryos. This study also reveals that residues of glyphosate in food also slow plumage development and linger in eggs, muscles and livers of the birds.

Another study of chickens shows “exposure to GLP led to a significant reduction in the expression of key productivity-related genes.”

Exposure directly in the eggs of chickens to glyphosate-based herbicides induces teratogenic effects with negative effects on embryonic growth and development, as well as embryo mortality. (See research here.)

Changes in blood parameters, adverse effects on digestive tract development and reduced body weight are noted in chickens exposed to glyphosate.

Reproductive and developmental impacts regarding eggshell quality and embryo development are also associated with levels of both glyphosate and AMPA within egg yolk.

Yet another study shows that a decline in hatchability is associated with higher levels of glyphosate residues in feed among broiler breeders.

Regulatory deficiencies and the organic solution

Despite mounting scientific evidence that continues to link glyphosate to adverse effects in a wide range of species, current regulations fail to protect health and the environment.

The regulatory processes, such as those utilized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), also ignore factors that enhance the toxicity of these already harmful chemicals, such as synergy, mixtures and inert ingredients.

“Current safety evaluations mostly concentrate on glyphosate in isolation, overlooking the synergistic toxic effects of commercial formulations and their capacity for bioaccumulation in adipose tissues,” the authors point out.

They continue:

“Furthermore, the heightened toxicity of commercial glyphosate formulations, influenced by co-formulants such as POEA, in conjunction with glyphosate’s interference with gut microbiota, cytochrome P450 enzymes, and endocrine functions, emphasises the necessity for cumulative risk assessments and long-term studies that account for species variability, bioaccumulation, and synergistic effects.”

These inadequacies in the regulation of petrochemical pesticides and synthetic fertilizers support the urgent need for the widespread adoption of safer alternatives.

The holistic approach of organic agriculture and land management protects all organisms, including humans, and the environment through the elimination of harmful toxicants and the focus on building soil health.

This also mitigates the current crises of biodiversity, public health, and climate change, among other benefits.

Previous Daily News pieces showcase how organic meats are also safer for consumption. See “Conventional Meats Contaminated with Multi-Drug Resistant Bacteria, at Significantly Higher Rates than Organic Meats” and “Conversion to Organic Poultry Farming Lowers Risk of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria” for more information.

Additional research shows that organic poultry farming has both health and financial benefits.

Two studies reveal the potential for organic poultry farming to significantly reduce the risk to human health from food pathogens, as well as the cost to society of treating and eliminating those pathogens.

To learn more about how you can support the organic solution, see here and here.

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/glyphosate-eggs-chicken-grocery-stores-traced-gmo-poultry-feed/