Extent of destruction in Tel Aviv following Iran’s retaliatory strikes
Reply

The Israeli military has acknowledged the inability of its radar systems to intercept sophisticated incoming Iranian missiles, and its air defense units to bring them down. (Photo by Tasnim news agency)
Press TV
The Israeli military has admitted that US-built Israeli radar systems have been largely unable to intercept incoming Iranian missiles.
According to a report published by the Israeli Haaretz newspaper, Israeli military units have confessed to their failure to intercept and shoot down Iranian missiles headed for the occupied territories.
Additionally, it said that sirens were activated on Friday only a few moments before evacuation orders were sent out to illegal settlers.
In response to mounting criticism of the Israeli army’s delayed activation of security alerts, the army said that it cannot determine the duration between alerts and sirens warning of incoming missiles.
Similarly, the command center of the Israeli internal front stated that security alerts, for operational considerations, could be sent to settlers only a short while before the sirens are sounded, or at times not even sent.
Haaretz then cited satellite images, noting that Iran is seeking to target radar systems and strategic military facilities in a bid to render the radars of the US and its allies ineffective.
The newspaper noted that Iran’s precision strikes against radar installations will significantly lower Israel’s missile interception ability and disturb its quick alert systems.
The revelations come as Israeli media outlets have frequently pointed to the inefficiency of Iron Dome missile systems to confront the volume and velocity of Iranian missiles.
Israeli military experts have warned that the latest generation of Iranian missiles enjoys higher speed, can cruise complicated routes and have very low radar recognition features, which make it a serious challenge for Israeli air defense systems to detect and bring them down.
[…]
Press TV
A classified assessment by the National Intelligence Council has concluded that even a large-scale military offensive against Iran would be unlikely to topple the country’s political and security establishment.
The Washington Post, citing US officials familiar with the matter, reported on Saturday that the assessment suggests that the Islamic Republic’s system of governance is resilient enough to withstand even significant military pressure.
The report’s findings raise questions about the feasibility of the strategy advocated by US President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly said he intends to “clean out” Iran’s leadership structure.
According to officials cited in the report, the intelligence analysis examined potential outcomes of both limited strikes targeting senior leaders and broader attacks aimed at crippling Iran’s leadership and state institutions.
In both scenarios, analysts concluded that the country’s political and military institutions would preserve continuity of power.
The report determined that even with the assassination of Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, the country’s ruling system would continue to function through established succession mechanisms.
These procedures include the appointment of a new leader by the powerful Assembly of Experts, a body responsible for overseeing leadership transitions.
Intelligence analysts also concluded that the prospect of Iran’s fragmented opposition taking power after a military strike was “unlikely,” according to people familiar with the classified findings.
The assessment comes as the US-Israeli aggression against Iran enters its second week and expands across multiple regions.
Despite the intelligence community’s caution, the Trump administration has publicly emphasized its military objectives.
Trump has also suggested that Washington could influence Iran’s future political leadership.
However, Iranian officials have rejected any notion of outside involvement in determining the country’s leadership.
Iran’s Parliament Speaker, Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, dismissed the idea that the US could influence the succession process, stating that Iran’s political future would be decided solely by the Iranian people.

RT
Tehran has decided to stop launching attacks on targets in neighboring countries and has no intention to invade them, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has said.
In a televised address, Pezeshkian apologized to the countries of the region and said Iran respected their sovereignty.
The US-Israeli war against Iran has entered its second week, with uncertainty growing over when hostilities might end. US President Donald Trump demanded Tehran’s “unconditional surrender,” while Israel continued attacks against targets in the Islamic Republic and launched a significant military incursion into Lebanon, prompting the UN to warn of a humanitarian crisis unfolding in the country.
Pezeshkian said the country’s Interim Leadership Council had approved a decision that no missile strikes would be carried out against regional states unless an attack on Iran originated from their territory.
Early on Saturday, missiles were seen flying towards Israel after the IDF said it had identified launches from Iran.
Explosions were heard as Israeli air defenses activated to intercept the incoming fire. Shortly after the barrage, the country’s military said it had begun a wave of strikes targeting infrastructure in the Iranian capital Tehran.
Washington and West Jerusalem have framed their first attacks on Iran as preemptive measures aimed at destroying its uranium enrichment and ballistic missile programs. The Islamic Republic insists that its nuclear program is peaceful and has denounced the strikes as entirely unprovoked.
Moscow has condemned the US-Israeli strikes as a “premeditated and unprovoked act of aggression” aimed at toppling a government that “refused to yield to the dictates of force and hegemonic pressure.”
The US-Israeli attacks have killed at least 1,332 Iranian civilians and wounded thousands, Iran’s UN ambassador Amir Saeid Iravani said. Tehran’s retaliatory attacks have killed 11 people in Israel, while at least six American service members have also been killed.
[…]
Via https://www.rt.com/news/634084-pezeshkian-iran-stop-attack-neighbouring-countries/

About 100 Days Until Factories Slow and the Boxes Stop Arriving
The tankers stopped.
Insurance markets froze first. Then freight rates spiked. Then captains hesitated. Then the Strait of Hormuz went quiet.
When a chokepoint closes, geography becomes destiny.
And for China, destiny runs on imported oil.
As of March 2026, analysts estimate China can function roughly 100 to 115 days if Hormuz remains fully blocked. Some banks whisper about 180 to 200 days if every strategic barrel is drained. That sounds comfortable. It is not.
Because inventory is not immunity. It is a countdown.
China learned this lesson slowly, then all at once.
It imports more than 70 percent of its crude consumption. It is the world’s largest oil importer. Roughly half of those imports flow through Hormuz. Thirty percent of its liquefied natural gas does too.
That is not ideology. That is arithmetic.
So Beijing did what great powers do when they feel exposed. It stockpiled.
As of early 2026:
China’s Oil Position
That mountain of crude was built quietly. No speeches. No slogans. Just steel tanks filling up.
This was not paranoia. It was insurance.
Now the policy is being tested.
Day one of a full closure does not feel like collapse.
Refineries keep running. Diesel flows. Cities hum. Coal keeps the grid alive. Markets wobble but do not panic.
China is not fragile.
But this is how depletion works.
Oil stocks are not evenly distributed. Commercial barrels move daily. Strategic barrels are political decisions. Pipelines cannot suddenly double capacity.
China’s overland lifelines:
Combined, these pipelines supply only a fraction of China’s total daily crude demand. They cannot replace millions of barrels per day from the Gulf.
So the 100 day window is not about total shutdown.
It is about when tradeoffs begin.
No panic. The government signals confidence. Strategic stocks remain mostly untouched. Commercial refiners draw from inventories. Prices climb globally but domestic stability is preserved.
Freight reroutes around the Cape of Good Hope. Transit times stretch by weeks. Insurance costs compound. Brent pushes higher, potentially into triple digits.
China begins selective strategic releases. Energy intensive sectors feel quiet pressure. Nothing dramatic. Just limits.
The tone changes.
If Hormuz remains sealed, commercial stocks thin out. Diesel allocation becomes strategic. Export industries face margin compression. LNG shortages stress coastal industrial hubs.
The question becomes simple.
Which sectors get priority?
Food logistics. Military readiness. Critical manufacturing. Urban stability.
Steel output can pause. Luxury exports can slow. Political control cannot.

Oil at 120 to 150 dollars per barrel does not stay in the oil market.
It moves through fertilizer, plastics, shipping, food, air freight, petrochemicals.
China’s growth projections for 2026 sit near 4 percent. An energy shock shaves points off quickly.
Cost push inflation rises. Export margins shrink. Domestic transport costs surge.
And because China is the manufacturing spine of the global economy, the slowdown does not stay inside its borders.
Electronics, machinery, automotive components, consumer goods. Delays cascade.
This is not theory. It is supply chain math.
The real constraint is not how many barrels exist.
It is how fast replacement flows can move.
Hormuz handles about one fifth of global oil trade. Tankers rerouting around Africa increase voyage times dramatically. Shipping capacity tightens. Freight costs surge.
Even if physical oil exists, logistics slow it down.
China could survive 100 days. It could possibly stretch longer by rationing and releasing strategic reserves.
But survival and normal functioning are not the same.
Normal functioning requires flow.
And flow requires open sea lanes.
If the closure persists, Beijing has levers.
None of these solve the problem overnight.
All of them buy time.
China’s advantage is centralized coordination. It can ration faster than market democracies. It can redirect supply by decree.
That is structural power.
Here is the paradox.
Every chokepoint accelerates adaptation.
The 1973 oil shock reshaped Japan’s efficiency model. The 1990 Gulf War reshaped U.S. strategic reserves. Europe’s gas crisis reshaped LNG infrastructure.
If Hormuz remains blocked long enough to sting but not collapse China, it becomes fuel for transformation.
More pipelines. More Arctic shipping. More domestic production. Faster electrification. Faster storage buildout.
Crisis compresses time.
And China has shown repeatedly that it can move fast under constraint.
This is not just about Beijing.
It is about you.
Resilience is inventory plus optionality.
China stockpiled oil because it understood dependency. You can stockpile leverage in your own life the same way.
Cash reserves. Skills redundancy. Multiple income channels. Geographic flexibility. Network depth.
When chokepoints close, those who prepared breathe easier.
Those who did not panic.
The 100 day clock is a metaphor.
How long can you function if one supply line disappears?
Build your reserves before the strait closes.
Read this slowly.
The world runs on flows. Oil. Data. Capital. Food. Attention.
When flows stop, systems reveal their design.
China is not collapsing tomorrow. It has built buffers. It has planned for disruption. It can ration, redirect, and adapt.
[…]
Via https://wavesandpositions.substack.com/p/the-100-day-clock-when-hormuz-closes
👍 US-Israel-Iran war | @geopolitics_prime✡️
Israel’s getting pummelled, banning info on its defeats — former US officer
💬 “They [Israel] are getting absolutely pummelled. I think [Netanyahu is] on a plane 90% of the time… He’s flying around the Mediterranean. He’s staying out of the fray as best he can, because he knows that he is the number one target,” retired US colonel Lawrence Wilkerson says.
Iran manages to damage Israeli cities, he adds, noting that fewer and fewer of the IDF interceptors are being used to stop the Iranian missiles, but Israel imposes tight censorship to hide it.
By Ivan Kesic
In the first week of the US-Israeli aggression on Iran, the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) conducted a series of precision strikes that systematically degraded the much-hyped US integrated air and missile defense architecture across the region.
The strikes destroyed or severely damaged at least two AN/TPY-2 THAAD radars, a billion-dollar early-warning radar installation in Qatar, multiple supporting sensor nodes, and critical communications infrastructure.
Executed in a coordinated sequence of precision engagements, Iranian retaliatory operations under the banner ‘True Promise 4’ have significantly disrupted the regional defensive network and forced US commanders to urgently reassess and reconstitute capabilities that took two decades and tens of billions of dollars to deploy.
The scale and sophistication of the Iranian operation mark a significant moment in contemporary warfare, demonstrating that even highly advanced missile defense systems, often presented as near-impenetrable shields, remain vulnerable to determined adversaries equipped with precision guidance, reliable intelligence, and an operational doctrine focused on disabling the core command, sensor, and communications nodes of defensive networks.
As commercial satellite imagery continues to emerge from across the region, the extent of the damage is becoming increasingly difficult to conceal, revealing substantial operational setbacks that raise serious questions about the resilience of the defensive architecture underpinning American force posture from the Persian Gulf to the Korean Peninsula.
The targeting doctrine evident in the strikes reflects years of detailed analysis and planning, with Iranian strategists identifying critical nodes and developing the capability to strike them simultaneously across a wide geographic area.
The coordinated targeting of early-warning radars, fire-control radars, communications infrastructure, and supporting facilities demonstrates a systemic approach to warfare rarely executed at such scale, focusing on neutralizing the command-and-control backbone of the defensive network rather than peripheral elements.
[…]

Heart of the beast: Understanding AN/TPY-2 radar’s critical role
The AN/TPY-2 transportable radar represents the technological centerpiece of the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system. This massive X-band active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar consumes roughly two megawatts of power and is distributed across five forty-foot trailers.
With an antenna area of 9.2 square meters and an instrumental range exceeding 2,000 kilometers in forward-based mode, the radar functions as the primary sensor of the entire THAAD battery. Without it, the launchers and their 48 interceptors are effectively rendered inoperative, deprived of the detection and tracking data required for engagement.
Manufactured by Raytheon using gallium nitride technology, each AN/TPY-2 radar carries an estimated cost ranging from $500 million to $1 billion. Since development began in the 1990s, only about twenty units have been produced worldwide.
[…]
Jordan: The first thousand-kilometer precision strike
At Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan, located more than 800 kilometers from the nearest Iranian territory, satellite imagery captured on March 2 reveals the charred remains of an AN/TPY-2 radar that had reportedly been deployed at the base since at least mid-February.
The imagery shows debris scattered across the deployment site, surrounding what appears to have been a fully assembled radar system. Two large impact craters, each roughly thirteen feet in diameter, are visible in the sand nearby, suggesting that multiple precision munitions were employed to ensure the destruction of the system.
Prior to the escalation of hostilities, the base had served as a major hub for American air operations, with more than fifty fighter aircraft visible on the tarmac in pre-war satellite imagery.
The deployment of a THAAD battery at the site fulfilled two key operational objectives: protecting the concentration of air assets from potential ballistic missile threats and extending a defensive coverage umbrella toward Israeli territory.
[…]

United Arab Emirates: Systematic elimination of terminal defenses
The Al Ruwais facility in the United Arab Emirates, positioned to protect critical energy infrastructure along the Persian Gulf coast, suffered near-simultaneous strikes against both its THAAD radar and the supporting infrastructure that housed the system.
Satellite imagery from March 1, the second day of the war that was imposed on Iran, shows dark markings from apparent strikes on three buildings, including a pull-through vehicle shed specifically designed to shelter the radar system.
The pattern of damage suggests Iranian planners understood not only where the radar would be positioned when active but also where it would be maintained and stored.
At a second UAE installation near Al Sader, satellite imagery reveals an almost identical strike pattern with four buildings damaged, including multiple vehicle sheds configured for radar storage.
[…]
Commercial imagery providers captured before and after images that leave little doubt about the severity of the damage, with burned equipment visible at the precise locations where radar components had been regularly observed.
Qatar: Billion-dollar early warning backbone destroyed
The destruction of the AN/FPS-132 Block 5 Upgraded Early Warning Radar at Umm Dahal in Qatar represents perhaps the single most expensive individual loss of the campaign, with that system alone costing approximately one point one billion dollars when installed in 2013.
[…]
The Qatari Ministry of Defence’s rare public confirmation of the radar’s destruction carries strategic significance beyond the military impact, as host-nation acknowledgment forecloses any possibility of concealing the loss and signals to regional allies that American assurances of protective capability may no longer carry their former weight.
[…]

Saudi Arabia: Smoke rising from Prince Sultan Air Base
At a site near Prince Sultan Air Base in Al Kharj, Saudi Arabia, satellite imagery captured on March 1 shows smoke rising from a compound where a THAAD radar had been previously positioned, with a tent used to shelter the antenna unit showing extensive charring and debris scattered across the surrounding area.
Imagery from January had shown the radar antenna pointed northeast toward Iran in its operational configuration, suggesting the site was fully functional when struck.
[…]
Kuwait: Communications infrastructure and radar domes destroyed
The strikes extended beyond the core missile defense sensors to target the communications infrastructure that enables these systems to function as an integrated network.
At Arifjan base in Kuwait, satellite imagery confirms the destruction of three radomes, the protective spherical structures housing satellite communications antennas that provide the data links connecting distributed sensors to command nodes.
Eight additional buildings related to satellite communications infrastructure were destroyed at separate locations in Kuwait, representing a systematic effort to attack the network backbone.
The AN/GSC-52B radars destroyed in Bahrain represent another category of communications and surveillance assets, providing both satellite communications connectivity and contributing to the space surveillance network.
[…]

Strategic calculus: Twenty years of investment destroyed in seven days
The development of the THAAD system began in 1992, with the US Army finally fielding the first operational batteries in April 2012. The journey from initial concept to deployable capability required approximately twenty years and tens of billions of dollars.
[…]
Each unit requires years to manufacture, and the destruction of multiple units simultaneously creates a capability gap that cannot be quickly filled.
The financial losses are staggering. Individual AN/TPY-2 radars cost between five hundred million and one billion dollars. The AN/FPS-132 early warning radar cost approximately one point one billion dollars.
The AN/GSC-52B radars, the radomes, the communications buildings, and support infrastructure add hundreds of millions more.
[…]
Tactical paralysis: The loss means for current operations
The immediate tactical consequence is the effective paralysis of multiple THAAD batteries that now sit blind on their launch positions. Without the AN/TPY-2 radar providing tracking data and fire control solutions, the launchers and their forty-eight interceptors per battery cannot engage incoming threats.
The interceptors themselves, each costing approximately thirteen million dollars, cannot be employed without the radar’s guidance.
[…]
Aegis warships must now rely solely on their own SPY radar systems. The integrated battle management system now resembles disconnected nodes fighting local engagements without a common operating picture.
The psychological impact cannot be overstated. Soldiers assured that the most advanced missile defense systems would protect them, but now find their protective shield penetrated repeatedly.
The sight of satellite imagery showing the blackened remains of billion-dollar systems creates a perception of vulnerability that no amount of official reassurance can counter.
Global implications: South Korea, Guam, and the strategic reserve dilemma
The destruction of multiple THAAD systems in West Asia has immediate implications for American force posture worldwide, particularly in the Indo-Pacific, where North Korea’s advancing missile program has long justified THAAD deployment.
Reports that Washington is considering relocating THAAD and Patriot systems from South Korea to West Asia reflect the severity of the capability gap.
The THAAD battery in Seongju, South Korea, represents not merely a defensive asset but a political commitment that has survived years of diplomatic tension with China.
Removing it would signal a shift in American priorities, potentially encouraging North Korea to react. Guam, home to another THAAD battery protecting critical American bases, would face similar exposure if its systems were stripped.
The interceptor stockpile faces equally severe pressure. The expenditure of approximately thirty percent of the total THAAD interceptor inventory in a twelve-day aggression in June 2025 demonstrated how quickly these scarce resources can be consumed.
With production capacity limited to approximately eleven to twelve interceptors annually, reconstituting inventory will require years.
Technology question: What Iranian precision reveals about US vulnerabilities
The successful destruction of hardened, defended targets across distances exceeding 800 kilometers reveals Iranian technological capabilities that many Western analysts had previously dismissed.
The terminal guidance required to place a warhead within meters of a specific radar antenna reflects maturation in seeker technology and potentially man-in-the-loop targeting.
The strikes also reveal sophisticated intelligence collection operating for years beneath the threshold of detection, building detailed targeting folders on facilities across multiple countries.
The symmetry between strikes in different countries suggests a targeting process that understood standardized American configurations.
The electronic warfare dimension likely played a critical role in enabling strikes to penetrate defended airspace.
The fact that no Iranian missiles or drones were intercepted before reaching targets across four countries suggests either that defenses were neutralized electronically or that the volume and coordination overwhelmed engagement capabilities.
Production constraints: Why replacement takes years, not weeks
The industrial base that produces AN/TPY-2 radars operates on peacetime assumptions, with production lines sized to meet gradual replacement requirements rather than the surge demands of major conflict.
The supply chain for specialized components extends across multiple states and countries, with some materials sourced from single suppliers operating at limited capacity.
Even with emergency funding, the time required to produce a single AN/TPY-2 radar cannot be compressed below physical limits.
The most optimistic assessments place replacement timelines in the range of three to five years for a single unit.
The radars destroyed in the first week of March 2026 will not return to the operational inventory until late in the decade at the earliest.
Regional power shift: The new strategic reality
The destruction of America’s premier missile defense assets across four countries fundamentally alters the strategic calculus in West Asia, shifting the initiative decisively toward Tehran.
Iranian military planners who previously had to calculate interception probabilities now face a dramatically reduced defensive threat, enabling expanded targeting options with reduced risk.
Persian Gulf Cooperation Council states that have invested billions in American missile defense now face uncomfortable questions about the wisdom of those investments.
If billion-dollar radars can be destroyed by missiles costing a fraction of that amount, the entire foundation of the Persian Gulf defense relationship requires reexamination.
For the Israeli regime, which has integrated its Arrow and David’s Sling systems with American sensors, the loss of THAAD coverage in Jordan represents a direct blow.
The anti-missile umbrella that previously extended from the Persian Gulf to the Mediterranean now has a gap in its center.
Fiasco verdict: Why two lost radars mean total system failure
Military analysts have begun using language rarely applied to American systems, with experts noting that the loss of a single AN/TPY-2 radar represents an event of significant operational importance while the loss of two constitutes a total fiasco.
The gap between what THAAD was supposed to accomplish and what it achieved against Iranian precision strikes could hardly be wider.
[…]
Donald Trump has stressed that any deal with Iran must result in the country’s “unconditional surrender”, setting maximalist war objectives for the United States.
The US president’s remarks on his Truth Social platform on Friday appear to reject the prospect of a compromise amid Iranian confirmation of diplomatic mediation to end the conflict.
“There will be no deal with Iran except UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!” Trump wrote.
“After that, and the selection of a GREAT & ACCEPTABLE Leader(s), we, and many of our wonderful and very brave allies and partners, will work tirelessly to bring Iran back from the brink of destruction, making it economically bigger, better, and stronger than ever before.”
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian had said earlier that some countries are engaging in mediation efforts to end the war, emphasising that Iran is committed to peace in the region but prepared to defend itself.
“Mediation should address those who underestimated the Iranian people and ignited this conflict,” Pezeshkian said in a social media statement.
The conflict has spread across the Middle East, igniting Iranian attacks across the Gulf and a war between Hezbollah and Israel, resulting in a mass displacement crisis in Lebanon.
Iran has been launching missiles and drones at Israel and US interests and assets across the region. Iranian forces have also targeted energy and civilian infrastructure in Gulf countries, straining ties with the Arab world.
The violence, which saw Iran largely succeed in closing down the Strait of Hormuz, has sent oil prices soaring globally.
Iranian officials have expressed defiance since the start of the war, stressing that they are ready for a long conflict and prepared to fend off a US ground invasion should it occur.
Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a message to Trump on Thursday that the US plan for a “clean rapid military victory failed”.
“Your Plan B will be even bigger failure,” Araghchi wrote on X.
On Friday, Iran’s top diplomat posted a photo of the coffins of a mother and child, the apparent victims of US-Israeli attacks. “Our Brave and Powerful Armed Forces will avenge each and every Iranian mother, father, and child who has been targeted by hostile forces,” Araghchi wrote.
The war has killed at least 1,332 people in Iran, among them 181 children, according to UNICEF.
The deadliest incident was a strike on a girls’ primary school in the southern city of Minab on the opening day of the conflict, which Iranian authorities said killed about 180 pupils and staff.
The Trump administration has pushed to project confidence and dominance over Iran, with top officials saying that the US would “rain missiles”, “death and destruction” on the country.
In recent days, Trump has repeatedly said that he would like to replicate the Venezuela playbook in Iran – keeping the governing system in place but installing a leader who is friendly to US interests.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Friday that when Trump determines Iran “no longer poses a threat to the United States” and the goals of Operation Epic Fury have been met, Iran will effectively be in a state of “unconditional surrender”.
Leavitt said the US expects the war to go on for approximately four to six more weeks.
On Wednesday, Trump said he has to be “involved” in choosing the successor of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was assassinated in a US-Israeli attack on Saturday.
Trump told CNN later on Thursday that the situation in Iran is going to work “easily” like it did in Venezuela when Delcy Rodriguez replaced President Nicolas Maduro after he was abducted by US forces in January.
Leavitt confirmed the US’s intelligence agencies and government are considering a “number” of possible replacements for the late Ayatollah Ali Khamenei but declined to provide details.
Rodriguez, who previously served as Maduro’s vice president, has allowed Washington to sell Venezuela’s oil and cut off petroleum supplies to Cuba under the threat of further US strikes.
Trump said he does not mind of the next leader of Iran is a religious figure.
“I’m saying there has to be a leader that’s going be fair and just. Do a great job. Treat the United States and Israel well, and treat the other countries in the Middle East — they’re all our partners,” he told CNN.
The supreme leader of Iran must be a Shia Muslim religious scholar.
Khamenei’s successor will be selected by an elected council of 88 members known as the Assembly of Experts.
[…]
Via https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/6/no-deal-with-iran-except-unconditional-surrender-trump-says
Larry C Johnson
Donald Trump made a bold and provably wrong claim yesterday about the US air-defense missile inventory:
The United States Munitions Stockpiles have, at the medium and upper medium grade, never been higher or better — was stated to me today we have a virtually unlimited supply of these weapons. Wars can be ‘forever,’ and very successfully, using just these supplies (which are better than other countries’ finest arms!). At highest end we have good supply but not where we want to be. Much additional high-grade weaponry is stored for us in outlying countries.
I will now show you conclusively that Trump is gaslighting the public, at least with respect to the PAC-3 MSE missiles. The PAC-3 MSE (Patriot Advanced Capability-3 Missile Segment Enhancement) is effectively the primary missile used in the modern Patriot system for most high-priority threats, particularly in current U.S. Army and allied operations as of 2026. The PAC-3 MSE ( Missile Segment Enhancement) began low-rate initial production (LRIP) in 2014, with deliveries starting in 2015 and full-rate production approved in 2018.
Starting in 2015 and continuing through 2020, the US produced between 100 — 300 a year. Let’s use the higher figure… That is 1,800 PAC-3 MSE. In the succeeding four year period, the US produced an estimated 2,200 PAC-3 MSEs (i.e., 500+ per year). In 2025 the US boosted production to 620. Total PAC-3 MSEs produced since 2015 is 4,620.
When the PAC-3 MSE is employed against an incoming threat, a minimum of two are fired. Keep that figure in mind. So how many have we sent Ukraine? According to open source documents, including DOD/DOW budget figures, the the US has transferred 847 PAC-3 MSE missiles to Ukraine. Assuming that the US and Israel have NOT fired any PAC-3 MSE missiles in 2025 and 2026, the US only has 3,773 in its inventory. We know that is ridiculous, but play along with me.
During the 12-day war Iran fired at least 600 ballistic missiles into Israel. In theory, the Patriot system is designed to work against ballistic missiles while Israel’s Iron Dome is designed to defeat short-range counter-rocket, artillery, and mortar (C-RAM) defense, plus capabilities against drones, cruise missiles, precision-guided munitions (PGMs), and some ballistic threats in certain configurations. So let’s assume that the Patriot was fired at 500 of the Iranian missiles — i.e., at least 1,000 PAC-3 MSE missiles were fired. That shrinks the US inventory to 2,773.
In just four days since the start of Epic Fury, Iran has fired an estimated 200 missiles at sites in the Gulf nations and Israel that have Patriot batteries. Conceivably, that means that another 400 PAC-3 MSE missiles have been launched, which shrinks the inventory to 2,373. If Iran fires 60 ballistic missiles per day, and the Patriot system uses 2 interceptors per incoming missile (a common conservative engagement doctrine for high-confidence intercepts against ballistic threats), the inventory would be exhausted after 19 full days, with enough left on the 20th day to handle roughly 46–47 Iranian missiles before depletion (about 19.775 days total, or roughly 19 days and 18–19 hours of sustained operations at this rate). In other words, the US PAC-3 MSE missiles will be exhausted on March 23, 2026.
Note that I am assuming that the entire inventory of US Patriot missiles have been deployed to Israel and US bases in the region. That is a false assumption because there are Patriot missile batteries with a full complement of missiles in other theaters. At present there are three Patriot battalions permanently assigned/forward-deployed to INDOPACOM (e.g., in South Korea/Japan/Guam areas, like 35th ADA Brigade and 1-1 ADA at Kadena); EUCOM has one Patriot battalion assigned (e.g., units in Germany like Baumholder/Ansbach areas, supporting NATO/Eastern flank).
The US Army has 15 Patriot battalions total (14 fully available as of mid-2025, with one in modernization), each typically consisting of 4–6 batteries (a battery is the firing unit with launchers/radars). A Patriot battery (also called a fire unit) typically includes 6–8 launchers (Launching Stations), though configurations vary by operator, mission, and launcher type (e.g., M903 for modern U.S. systems). If we assume that the four Patriot battalions have four batteries each, with 72 missiles per battery, we get a total of 1,152 missiles that must be subtracted from the maximum possible number deployed to the Middle East — i.e., the actual inventory, using the most conservative estimate, is 1,221. That means the US inventory of PAC-3 MSE missiles, using the assumptions above that Iran is firing 60 ballistic missiles per day, the supply of missiles will run out in 10 days. This is why I assert that Donald Trump is out of touch with reality.
Department of Justice and Getty Images/Collage by Danielle A. Scruggs/NPR
The Justice Department has published additional Epstein files related to allegations that President Trump sexually abused a minor after an NPR investigation found dozens of pages were withheld.
They include 16 new pages that cover three additional FBI interview summaries with a woman who accused Trump of sexual abuse decades ago when she was a minor. Also included are two pages of an intake form documenting the initial call to the FBI from a friend who relayed the claims.
NPR’s investigation previously found 53 pages that appeared to be missing from the public database.
Now that these documents are published, there are still 37 pages of records missing from the public database, including notes from the interviews, a law enforcement report and license records.
The Justice Department has repeatedly told NPR that any documents withheld were “privileged, are duplicates or relate to an ongoing federal investigation.”
Last week, after NPR’s initial story, the Justice Department said it was determining if records had been mistakenly tagged as duplicates and if any were found, “the Department will of course publish it, consistent with the law.”
More detail, but less context
The interview documents are part of more than 1,000 new pages published to the Epstein files public database Thursday that also include what appears to be the complete case file from the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell initiated in 2006.
The new documents go into more detail about the allegations made against both Trump and Epstein when the woman was between 13 to 15 years old.
An FBI email summarizing the claims and a Justice Department PowerPoint slide deck note the woman claimed that around 1983, when she was around 13 years old, Epstein introduced her to Trump, “who subsequently forced her head down to his exposed penis which she subsequently bit. In response, Trump punched her in the head and kicked her out.”
In the newly-published documents, the woman’s described how Trump allegedly put her head “down to his penis” and she “bit the s*** out of it.” She alleged that Trump struck her and said something to the effect of “get this little b**** the hell out of here.”
During the final interview the woman had with the FBI in 2019, when asked whether she “felt comfortable detailing her contacts with Trump,” she reportedly asked “what the point would be of providing the information at this point in her life when there was a strong possibility nothing could be done about it.”
The new files do not shed any more light on how credible federal investigators viewed her claims or how they were resolved. Still unanswered, too, is why the allegations were included in a Justice Department slide presentation last year summarizing the cases against Epstein and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell.
Trump has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing related to Epstein. The White House and Justice Department have warned that the raw files released to the public include “untrue and sensationalist claims.”
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement to NPR Friday that Trump has been “totally exonerated by the release of the Epstein files.”
“These are completely baseless accusations, backed by zero credible evidence, from a sadly disturbed woman who has an extensive criminal history,” Leavitt wrote. “The total baselessness of these accusations is also supported by the obvious fact that Joe Biden’s department of justice knew about them for four years and did nothing with them — because they knew President Trump did absolutely nothing wrong. As we have said countless times, President Trump has been totally exonerated by the release of the Epstein Files.”
The White House also noted a Justice Department statement posted Thursday on X that said there were 15 documents it discovered were “incorrectly coded as duplicative” and there were five prosecution memos that the Southern District of Florida determined could be published while protecting privileged materials.
Democrats and Republicans on the House Oversight Committee have demanded answers from the Justice Department regarding the missing files and the department’s handling of the release of Epstein documents. This week, the committee voted to subpoena Attorney General Pam Bondi to answer questions about the files.
[…]
Via https://www.npr.org/2026/03/05/nx-s1-5737562/justice-department-missing-epstein-files-trump