The Most Revolutionary Act

Uncensored updates on world events, economics, the environment and medicine

The Most Revolutionary Act

What Genes Tell Us About the Evolution of Language

Mengenal Sejarah dan Penyebaran Manusia Purba

Episode 34 What Genes Tell Us

Dr John McWhorter (2019)

Film Review

Geneticists use DNA studies, specifically the history of mutations to trace historical movements of ethnic populations. Because random mutations (most harmless) occur at a predictable rate, they can pinpoint the approximate date that sub-populations separate from one another. According to DNA analysis, most of our current global population is descended from migrants who left Africa 100,000 years ago.

Languages undergo similar predictable changes. Migration of language groups can be tracked via glottochronology. This methodology is based on the discovery that when language groups separate, each loses 14 core words every 1000 years form the Swadesh list of key words.

 

The Swadesh List and CAWL | Language Exchange Amino

Languages with a lot of borrowed words can change more rapidly. Norwegian is example. Both Icelandic and Norwegian are descended from Old Norse. The former is still basically Old Norse while Norwegian has a lot of words borrowed from Danish and low German.

Although there is still controversy over where proto-IndoEuropean arose (either the Ukrainian steppes 6,000 years ago Turkey 8,000 years ago), DNA studies show that modern Europeans arrived in Europe in three distinct waves. The first to arrive were hunter gatherers 40,000-12,000 years ago. The second wave were farmers genetically related to modern residents of Siberia and the Near East 8,000 years ago. The third were technically advanced Yamnaya from Ukraine 5,000 years ago. The latter spoke an IndoEuropean language, which replaced the Basque spoken by the hunter gatherers and the Etruscan spoken by the migrating farmers.

DNA from Otzi (Frozeman) found in the Alps on the border between Italy and Germany indicate an IndoEuropean culture known as the Villanovan culture had reached Italy by 1100 BC.

Genetic studies also confirm the Dravidian language and culture dominated all of India prior to the arrival IndoEuropeans around 2,000-1,200 BC. The latter replaced Dravidian culture in most of northern India.

Gene studies also show that African click language all originated from the same family.

Genes also confirm there were two distinct migration of Pacific people out of Asia – one from Taiwan to Melanesia and one from Melanesia to Polynesia. They also suggest large numbers of Polynesians learned to speak a Polynesian language as adults, which helps explain why so many Polynesian languages have been streamlined (losing prefixes and suffixes, etc).

Genetic studies have also helped linguists ascertain whether the Omotic subfamily belongs to the Afroasiatic (Semitic) language family. Genetic studies of populations in southwest Ethiopia and southeast Sudan who speak Omotic languages suggest they aren’t (that they’re language isolates unrelated to any known language family).

Although linguistically Navajo seems related to the Ket language spoken in Siberia, genetic evidence doesn’t support this. See Basque, Ainu, Somali, Etruscan: Languages Without Families

DNA studies indicate the Inuit aren’t descended from the original Siberian migration to to North America. They appear to have arrived with the Thule migration on the West Coast of Alaska around 1000 AD and gradually spread across northern Canada. Similar evidence indicates that Dorset culture arrived in Greenland (from Siberia) around 4,500 years ago and disappeared around 700 years ago.

DNA evidence confirms that the Chukoto-Kamachatkam Paleo Siberian culture, which has ejectives* similar to Pacific Northwest indigenous languages, are distantly related.

At the same time, McWhorter finds it really puzzling that there is no genetic evidence of Norse DNA in modern Britain, given the massive Norse influence on English (get, happy and skirt are Norse word). In English grammar the preposition stranding (eg where the preposition comes at the end of the sentence – “What is that for?”) is a Norse construction.

Mengenal Sejarah dan Penyebaran Manusia Purba

*Ejective sounds are made by trapping above the glottis and pushing it out:

https://www.kanopy.com/en/pukeariki/watch/video/6120000/6120068

Violent clashes in Israel as protesters attack troops detaining draft-dodging yeshiva students

Ultra orthodox Jews block a road and clash with police during a protest against the drafting of ultra orthodox jews to the Israeli army, in Ramat Gan, December 24, 2024.
Ultra orthodox Jews block a road and clash with police during a protest against the drafting of ultra orthodox jews to the Israeli army, in Ramat Gan, December 24, 2024.(photo credit: ITAI RON/FLASH90)

By AVI SOLOMON

Violent clashes broke out as hundreds of protesters gathered in Ramat Gan on Tuesday night to prevent arrests after military police went to detain yeshiva students who avoided IDF enlistment.
As tensions escalated, Border Police units arrived to rescue the soldiers. The troops were under attack by protesters who had overturned a military police vehicle at the scene. Earlier, when protesters had only blocked the vehicle, they sang, “We do not believe in the rule of the heretics, and we do not report to their offices.”
Ultimately, the military police succeeded in arresting three yeshiva students during the late-night operation. According to reports on ultra-Orthodox websites, an attempt to arrest another yeshiva student at his home was unsuccessful.

Teen arrested over assault on Shas MK Ben-Tzur

Additionally, a 14-year-old boy from Jerusalem was arrested on Sunday on suspicion of involvement in the assault of Shas MK Yoav Ben-Tzur and causing damage to his car during an incident that occurred about a week ago in downtown Jerusalem.

The police are continuing to identify other suspects seen in footage of the incident, collecting evidence, and deepening the investigation.
The attack that led to the investigation involved ultra-Orthodox individuals assaulting Ben-Tzur over his support for the draft law. Following the attack, his car sustained minor damage, but no injuries were reported. Police and Border Police forces on the ground dispersed the rioters and began searching for those involved.
Shortly after the assault, members of the Jerusalem Faction protested outside the homes of Shas leader Aryeh Deri and MK Yaakov Asher of the Degel HaTorah party, and once again outside Asher’s home.
[…]

Via https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-875227

Epstein’s Brother Mark Points to a Coverup in Jeffrey’s Death

A collage of a person with glasses AI-generated content may be incorrect.
Mark Epstein (left), Jeffrey Epstein (right). [Source: nypost.com]

Jeremy Kuzmarov

[…]

Mark is a retired real estate investor and businessman. At the time of his brother’s death, he says that he was on good terms with him and talked to him over the phone until his arrest in July, 2019. He says that he did not follow all the details of his legal case and had not seen him in person in about seven years.

When Mark heard news about Jeffrey’s death, he boarded a plane and was the one who identified his body.

At an X-space discussion with LiveOne.TV on November 11, Mark asserted that, at first, he thought that his brother had committed suicide, as the FBI and other government agencies claimed.

“I had no reason to doubt it [the suicide claim]. He was facing a long time in jail,” Mark said. “The life of a convicted pedophile is not very pleasant and Jeffrey was used to living life the way he wanted, with people around who catered to him and took care of him….He had no kids, our parents are gone; he didn’t have anyone to worry about. I thought he took the decision not to go through a trial and potential prison sentence, and decided to take himself out.”

Mark said that, when he hired the renowned forensic pathologist Dr. Michael Baden, he expected Baden to confirm that his brother had committed suicide. However, he said that Dr. Baden instead said he couldn’t call it a suicide because it “looked too much like a homicide.”

Dr. Baden told 60 Minutes that fractures found in the autopsy photos under Jeffrey’s neck and jaw were inconsistent with a suicide hanging. Baden said: “Going over a thousand jail hangings, suicides in the New York City state prisons over the past 40-50 years, no one had three fractures [as Epstein did].”[1]

Dr. Kristin Roman, the New York City pathologist charged with doing the autopsy, came out of the autopsy, like Dr. Baden, saying that Jeffrey’s death looked more like a homicide than a suicide.

The initial death certificate said, as cause of death, “pending further study.”

Mark said that Dr. Baden and Dr. Roman’s assessments did not appear in a June 2023 Department of Justice (DOJ) report.

The DOJ report relied on the assessment of New York’s Chief Medical Examiner, Dr. Barbara Sampson, who Mark said was not present at Jeffrey’s autopsy and never saw his body, though she said that his death was caused from suicide by hanging.

Mark said that he does not believe that Dr. Baden’s name even appeared in the DOJ report. He also said that he found a number of statements made by William Barr, the U.S. Attorney General at the time of Jeffrey’s death, to be untrue.

Most curious to Mark was Barr’s claim that he had watched video footage from outside the tier where Jeffrey was staying and that, because nobody was seen going in and out of the tier in the video, he became convinced that Jeffrey died by suicide.

Mark said that, when he heard Barr say this, he knew this was a cover-up of some kind.

Barr ignored the fact that 12 or so other prisoners were housed on Jeffrey’s tier who could have killed Jeffrey and then returned to their cell.

That night, it was actually reported that cell doors were left unlocked in Epstein’s tier.

Additionally, the video Barr allegedly saw did not show the actual door to the tier that is known to exist, meaning that someone could have gone through the door without being caught on camera.

CBS News analysis of the video contradicted Barr’s claims that the footage clearly showed no one entering the area near Epstein’s cell before he died.

The video on the night of Jeffrey’s death showed, just before 10:40 p.m., an orange shape moving up the stairs leading to Epstein’s area.

A 2023 report by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) concluded that the figure is a prison guard handing out bed clothes.

However, video forensic experts who reviewed the video for CBS believes it could be a prisoner in orange prison garb climbing the stairs toward Epstein’s unit.

Mark said he finds it suspicious that the Attorney General would take the time to watch the video directly and then misrepresent it.

He considers it to be highly plausible that the killer—who had either been placed in Jeffrey’s tier beforehand or was the orange-clad figure shown in the video that Barr somehow missed—was transferred to another prison right after killing Jeffrey and then was released or disappeared.

Mark said that, this past year, a number of pathologists have been studying Epstein’s autopsy and related pictures of the body and have confirmed that the death could not have been caused by suicide. This, he said, will be revealed publicly in the future.

One additional important thing that convinced Mark that his brother was murdered was the fact that he had a bail hearing coming up based on his appeal of a previous bail decision.

At the hearing, Jeffrey and his lawyers were planning to propose that they put up what would have amounted to the highest bail in U.S. history.

Mark said that he could “see that Jeffrey might have committed suicide if he had lost the bond hearing and didn’t want to sit in prison for a year while waiting for his trial. But it would have made no sense for him to have killed himself before the hearing.”

Mark continued: “If the judge granted him bond, he would have been able to live in his house with an ankle monitor and guards manning the place and cameras. This wouldn’t have been that terrible, especially since his house is real nice. So why would he take himself out if he had a chance to spend a year in his house awaiting trial.”

A “Perfect Storm of Screw-ups” and Evidence Tampering

Epstein’s death was surrounded by what Bill Barr called “a perfect storm of screw-ups” that raise suspicion of a larger conspiracy.

The most notable of the screw-ups was that the guards to Epstein’s cell, Michael Thomas and Tova Noel, fell asleep on duty and failed to perform checks that were supposed to occur twice every hour.

Thomas and Noel were later charged with falsifying records, saying that they had checked on Jeffrey through the night.

An additional screw-up was that the cameras on Epstein’s floor malfunctioned. The fire alarm in the building was also suspiciously inoperative the morning of Epstein’s death and Epstein’s cell had additional beddings and linens whose presence has never been explained.

A 60 Minutes investigation found that two nooses that were photographed in Epstein’s cell following his death showed both ends of the noose folded and hemmed and not cut. This was significant because the guards who allegedly found Epstein said they had cut the noose with scissors so they could get him down before trying to revive him.

Something else that is suspicious is that there is evidence of tampering with the video footage of Epstein’s tier, which had been seized by the FBI after Epstein’s death and then re-released. One scene from the video significantly has a cursor onscreen. A report by the website Wired also alleged that nearly three minutes of footage from the video appeared to be missing.[2]

Crime Scene Cover-up

In a clear sign of a cover-up, Epstein’s cell was cleaned and sanitized immediately after his death and before the FBI could gather evidence.

Standard police procedure in the case was generally not followed. Epstein’s body was moved by prison staff.

No photographs were taken of his remains in the cell or of his position at the point of death, and no tests were carried out for poison or DNA in Epstein’s cell.

Witness statements were not immediately secured and staff at the prison were interviewed only months later, with lawyer coaching.

Additionally, computer servers in Epstein’s wing were not secured and the hard drives were removed and then replaced that night.

Official Suicide Ruling Is Unfounded

Police experts—in differentiating a murder from a suicide—look at the position of the knot in the hanging cord and whether drool spilled to the ground, which would indicate suicide.

Since the crime scene was wiped clean in Epstein’s case, none of the tell-tale signs of suicide were prevalent, discrediting the DOJ and FBI’s suicide conclusion.

Ali Clark Investigation

Ali Clark is a professional investigator, with experience tracking intelligence agencies, who works as a researcher for Mark Epstein.

In a packet prepared for congressional leaders, Ms. Clark stated that “standard forensic procedure requires preserving, testing, and verifying all physical evidence with the possibility of criminal involvement in mind until it is conclusively ruled out. This did not occur in this [the Epstein] case. Instead, the government relied on assumptions, omissions, and procedural violations that suppressed or eliminated evidence. These inconsistencies, anomalies, and breakdowns destroyed the ability to determine whether Epstein was killed, coerced, or assisted in his death.”

Ms. Clark went on to note in her dossier that the OIG report openly admitted that the OIG staff did not investigate how Epstein died, only policy failures at the jail.

Ms. Clark discussed numerous additional anomalies, including the fact that inmate movement and logs on the night of Epstein’s death contain inconsistencies and may have been tampered with.

Ms. Clark concluded that the police investigation was “biased from the start—designed to close [the case], not uncover truth.”

She noted further that the irregularities in the case “collectively form a cascade of failures that suggest not incompetence but orchestration. It looks like a  narrative patched together after the fact to fit a pre-decided conclusion of suicide….”

More Missing Video Footage and a Ghost Prisoner

Mark Epstein was told that there was someone with a hand-held video camera taping in the prison infirmary and in the hospital where his brother was brought in. The content of his video has been publicly suppressed.

In a review of prison logs, Ms. Clark amazingly found, sandwiched between guard reassignments and management cancellations, an advanced assignment for a medical escort nine hours before Epstein was killed.

Ms. Clark has come to believe in the possibility that an unlogged or ‘off-the-books’ inmate was temporarily moved into Epstein’s tier for a specific operational purpose and then removed from the system altogether, whether through transfer, quiet release, or some other disposition.

That scenario is not merely hypothetical.

The count slips and housing records she and Mark have reviewed contain anomalies consistent with a “ghost inmate” being used to reconcile headcounts on paper without a corresponding, verifiable body in a bed.

In plain terms: the paperwork balances, but the underlying records don’t – and that gap has never been credibly explained.”

An additional curiosity is that one of the guards at the MCC is known to have worked overtime on the day Jeffrey was killed though was not listed in the overtime logs.

This guard did not scan his badge between August 6 until late in the day of August 10 even though he was known to have worked during that time.

[…]

Via https://covertactionmagazine.com/2025/11/24/jeffrey-epsteins-brother-mark-points-to-a-coverup-in-jeffreys-death/

Homeland Security probes Chinese-made Bitcoin mining equipment

Bitmain mining machines at a Canada Computational Unlimited Inc. computation center in Joliette, Quebec, Canada, on Friday, Sept. 10, 2021.

The world’s leading manufacturer of Bitcoin (BTC) mining equipment, Beijing-based Bitmain Technologies Ltd., has been under a national security probe in the U.S. for months now, as per a recent Bloomberg report.

Bitcoin mining is the process of using high-end computer systems to solve cryptographic functions, validate transactions, and add blocks to the network in return for BTC rewards.

While the U.S. leads the world in mining Bitcoin, it is China that is the global leader in manufacturing mining rig equipment.

The world’s three largest manufacturers of Bitcoin mining machines, namely Bitmain, Canaan, and MicroBT—all of Chinese origin—build over 90% of global mining rigs, as per a

Bitcoin miners across the globe, including those based in the U.S., are highly dependent on these Chinese suppliers. Notably, Bitmain Technologies is a supplier to American Bitcoin (Nasdaq: ABTC), as per the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

American Bitcoin is a Bitcoin mining and treasury company that U.S. President Donald Trump‘s sons Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. founded in March 2025.

China’s Bitmain under national security probe in U.S.

Last year, a federal review under the Joe Biden administration flagged the use of Chinese-manufactured Bitcoin mining rigs near a military site in Wyoming due to “national security concerns.”

In July 2025, the Senate Intelligence Committee made a similar claim in a report and said the use of machines made by Bitmain, a company “with ties to” the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), near sensitive defense installations creates “disturbing vulnerabilities.”

The report also claimed that Bitmain personnel in China have the capability to remotely control these machines, posing “an unacceptable risk.”

An undisclosed federal investigation called “Operation Red Sunset,” led by agents of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), also probed Bitmain equipment, Bloomberg cited a U.S. official and six other people familiar with aspects of the inquiry to report.

The probe aimed to inquire if these machines could indeed be remotely controlled for espionage or to sabotage the American power grid.

Bloomberg cited the U.S. official and three sources to report that policy deliberations at the White House’s National Security Council, beginning under the Biden administration and continuing well into the early months of the Trump administration, complemented the DHS inquiry.

Federal officials in the U.S. have stopped Bitmain machines at the ports and at times pulled them apart to probe more. The sources didn’t reveal the findings to the publication.

The current status of Operation Red Sunset is unclear. A senior administration official said,

“The US government is concerned about threats of this nature and are constantly and vigilantly monitoring them.”

Bitmain denies national security threat allegations

Bitmain said it’s “unequivocally false” that the company can remotely control its Bitcoin mining machines from China. It “strictly complies with US and applicable laws and regulations and has never engaged in activities that pose risks to US national security,” the statement read. Bitmain claimed it’s not aware of the “Operation Red Sunset.”

The detentions of its machines were related to concerns raised by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) but “nothing out of the ordinary was found,” Bitmain added.

The company also said it has “no connection to the Chinese government.”

American Bitcoin on its dealings with Bitmain

American Bitcoin “takes national security, grid stability and operation security extremely seriously,” said a company spokesman. He added that the company extensively tests hardware for security concerns and has found no vulnerabilities related to remote access.

The company’s rigorous security framework ensures that its mining operations would prevent threats to U.S. infrastructure.

American Bitcoin believes that when Bitmain’s machines “are deployed within modern industrial security standards, they do not present a credible risk to the United States power grid or to national security,” he added.

[…]

Via https://www.thestreet.com/crypto/policy/homeland-security-probes-chinese-made-bitcoin-mining-equipment

New Survey: 1 in 10 Adults Seriously Injured by a COVID Vaccine

covid vaccine

One in every 10 U.S adults who received the COVID-19 vaccine experienced “major” side effects, and over a third (36%) suffered “minor” side effects, according to a national survey conducted this month.

Based on a U.S. adult population of 258 million in 2020, the results mean that about 17 million adults who got the COVID-19 vaccine experienced major health effects, and roughly 63 million had minor side effects, said Rasmussen Reports, which conducted the survey.

The survey, which included 1,292 adults and had a margin sampling error of +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% confidence level, also revealed that 46% of both vaccinated and unvaccinated adults think it’s likely that COVID-19 vaccines have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths.

The numbers come as no surprise to Christopher Dreisbach, legal affairs director of React19, whose mission is to support the COVID-19 vaccine-injured. He told The Defender:

“Any surprise regarding the frequency and severity of these adverse reactions is simply the result of years of government and platform-level censorship that kept the injured’s experiences out of public view.”

Dreisbach was diagnosed with a debilitating and painful neurological disorder after getting Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.

Kristi Dobbs, who was also seriously injured when she took her first and only Pfizer COVID-19 shot on Jan. 18, 2021, said the U.S. government has yet to ensure that this kind of massive vaccine injury won’t happen again in the future.

With the exceptions of U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), who have been outspoken on COVID-19 vaccine injuries, most government officials are “hoping we will just be silenced and forgotten about,” Dobbs said.

She said she and others have been “shouting from the rooftops” since February 2021, when a group of them warned the National Institutes of Health that the shots were causing massive harm.

Since then, Dobbs has personally contacted the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Stanford University and the Mayo Clinic.

“My cries have fallen on deaf ears for years,” she said. “The vaccine-injured are still hurting, dying and being discarded as trash.”

Nikki Holland, REACT19’s community outreach officer, who was injured by a COVID-19 vaccine, said, “This is happening to real people in every community, not rare statistics. If we refuse to honestly recognize and investigate these injuries, we undermine the very principles that keep medicine evolving and patients safe.”

As of Aug. 29, 2025, there have been 1,666,646 COVID-19 vaccine injury reports filed in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), according to OpenVAERS. Of those, over 220,000 were serious enough to warrant hospitalization, and nearly 39,000 were reports of death. Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.

Adding to the underreporting of COVID-19 vaccine injuries, last month, an investigation by The Defender revealed that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or OSHA — the government agency that oversees workplace safety — directed healthcare employers not to report injuries related to COVID-19 vaccines, which were mandated for the workers.

Less than 0.3% of COVID injury claims compensated

An investigation in August by attorney Ray Flores and The Defender found that over 1.5 million people who reported COVID-19 injuries to the U.S. government’s compensation program were shut out from applying for compensation.

That’s because the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) — which processes COVID-19 injury claims — won’t accept applications from people who experience the most common, non-severe injuries.

Of those who can submit a claim, the odds are slim that they will be compensated quickly, sufficiently, or at all. As of June 1, CICP had received 13,836 COVID-19 vaccine injury claims and had compensated only 39 — less than 0.3%.

In June, Kennedy said in an interview with Tucker Carlson that he plans to beef up the government’s compensation efforts for the COVID-19 vaccine-injured, possibly by bringing COVID-19 vaccines under the federal vaccine injury compensation program that processes injury claims related to the other vaccines listed on the CDC schedule — not COVID-19 vaccines, which are still classified as a pandemic countermeasure, covered under the CICP.

“We just brought a guy in this week who is going to be revolutionizing the [National] Vaccine Injury Compensation program,” Kennedy told Carlson. “We’re looking at ways to enlarge the program so that COVID vaccine-injured people can be compensated.”

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services didn’t immediately respond when asked what steps Kennedy has taken since then.

Sen. Johnson ‘black-sheeped’ for spotlighting COVID vaccine injury

It may be increasingly difficult to overlook those injured by the COVID-19 vaccine, as there’s evidence their numbers are growing.

Dr. Joseph Varon, president and chief medical officer of the Independent Medical Alliance (IMA), noted in a Substack post about the Rasmussen survey that IMA doctors are now reporting a “marked rise in heart inflammation, unusual cancers, and other concerning conditions” among COVID-19 mRNA vaccine recipients.

The IMA, formerly the FLCCC or Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, is a nonprofit created to “save lives and promote long-term wellness through science-based, patient-centered care.”

“We are still only beginning to understand how mRNA interacts with the body,” Varon wrote. “This is why the COVID mandate period was so troubling for healthcare.”

Cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough said he manages a “never-ending stream of patients with new diseases that have developed after COVID-19 vaccination.”

Dobbs said she was grateful that Johnson, who chairs the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, in May held a hearing on the cover-up of COVID-19 vaccine risks. “But Johnson has been black-sheeped over the years, too,” she added.

Nearly five years of fighting to be heard has taken its toll, she said. “We have lost many to suicide and cancers.”

Still, Dobbs said she’s going to keep fighting to make things better for future generations. “We will be seen, heard and believed.”

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/1-in-10-adults-seriously-injured-covid-vaccine-new-survey-says/

Euroclear issues stark warning to EU over Russian assets plot

Euroclear issues stark warning to EU over Russian assets plot – FT

RT

The EU could face increased borrowing costs and long-term global reputational damage if it forces through its latest plan to use frozen Russian sovereign assets to finance new loans for Ukraine, Belgian depository Euroclear has warned, according to the Financial Times.

The privately owned clearing house holds around $200 billion of the $300 billion in Russian Central Bank assets frozen in the West after the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022. EU leaders want to issue a ‘reparation loan’ to Kiev by using those holdings as collateral. Moscow has denounced any such move as outright theft.

The Brussels-backed plot would be seen globally as “confiscation of central bank reserves, undermining the rule of law” by investors such as sovereign wealth funds and central banks, Euroclear CEO Valerie Urbain has warned, in a letter seen by the FT.

She also warned that the move would make European debt appear riskier and push up government borrowing costs across the bloc for a long time, the paper reported Thursday.

Urbain has previously cautioned that privately owned Euroclear could sue the EU if it attempts to confiscate the Russian sovereign funds held there.

The push to seize Russian assets has intensified as the US promotes a new initiative to settle the Ukraine conflict. US President Donald Trump has expressed optimism that a settlement could be reached. European officials, however, fear the American proposal could complicate the bloc’s plans, with the German newspaper Handelsblatt reporting that it might compel the EU to reimburse any diverted Russian funds.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen reaffirmed Brussels’ intent to press ahead with the asset grab on Tuesday while pledging continued EU support for Kiev. The Commission insists the proposed scheme does not amount to confiscation, though officials acknowledge there is a risk it will be perceived that way.

Russia has long stated that any attempt to seize its Central Bank assets would be regarded as “theft” and would undermine trust in Western financial institutions. Russian officials have accused Brussels of trying to prolong the Ukraine conflict for political advantage and to justify rising military budgets that benefit European arms manufacturers.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/628554-euroclear-assets-eu-damage-reputation/

US ICE Agents Trained by Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) and Use Israeli Spyware to Hack Americans’ Phones

 

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

If you still think that the current actions of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers are all about rounding up illegal immigrants who are all criminals, then you are missing a lot of information from wherever you get your news from.

One of the first complaints of ICE raids that started shortly after Trump took office at the beginning of the year is that they wore no uniform, masked their faces, and drove unmarked vehicles.

This has reportedly led to criminals attempting to impersonate ICE agents “to rob, kidnap and assault unsuspecting victims,” which has prompted a warning from the FBI.

Fox News recently reported:

FBI warns of crooks posing as ICE to terrorize communities – former agent explains red flags

The FBI is warning that criminals across several states are impersonating Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to rob, kidnap and assault unsuspecting victims.

In a bulletin posted last month, the bureau detailed several cases in which offenders identified themselves as immigration agents while wearing shirts or jackets marked with the ICE logo.

The Oct. 17 bulletin, first reported by WIRED and obtained by the transparency group Property of the People via a public-records request, describes multiple cases of criminals posing as ICE agents.

According to the FBI, victims have reported being threatened, robbed, kidnapped and even sexually assaulted by individuals posing as federal officers. Some of the incidents occurred in New York, Florida and North Carolina, the bulletin said.

Full article.

It is also widely reported that ICE agents routinely train with the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF). In recent days, some videos have appeared on TikTok claiming that some of the ICE agents deployed in U.S. cities are actual Israeli soldiers who served in the IDF.

I have compiled a short video about this, and about Rep. Thomas Massie’s comments that Israel is behind the efforts to try and stop the release of the “Epstein files.”

Recently, Elon Musk’s X platform released a new feature for X that was touted to be an effort towards more “transparency” where users found out when, and from what country, each X account originated from.

There was soon a video and images going viral that showed that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security X account originated from Tel Aviv, in Israel, starting in 2008. ICE is funded and operated through the Department of Homeland Security.

X very quickly took the feature offline so some of the more embarrassing X accounts could make edits, including the U.S. Department Homeland Security account.Read the full article.

It is also public knowledge the Trump administration purchased the Israeli-made spyware called “Paragon Solutions” to be used by their Israeli-trained ICE agents to be able to hack people’s cell phones out in the public.

ICE obtains access to Israeli-made spyware that can hack phones and encrypted apps

Trump administration contract with Paragon Solutions gives immigration agency access to one of the most powerful stealth cyberweapons

US immigration agents will have access to one of the world’s most sophisticated hacking tools after a decision by the Trump administration to move ahead with a contract with Paragon Solutions, a company founded in Israel which makes spyware that can be used to hack into any mobile phone – including encrypted applications. (Like the Signal app, making the phone a “listening device.”)

The Department of Homeland Security first entered into a contract with Paragon, now owned by a US firm, in late 2024, under the Biden administration. But the $2m contract was put on hold pending a compliance review to make sure it adhered to an executive order that restricts the US government’s use of spyware, Wired reported at the time.

That pause has now been lifted, according to public procurement documents, which list US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) as the contracting agency.

It means that one of the most powerful stealth cyber-weapons ever created – which was produced outside the US – is now in the hands of an agency that has repeatedly been accused by civil and human rights groups of violating people’s due process rights.

Full article.

The Zionist agenda behind ICE and their connections to Israeli intelligence was discussed by Marcy Winograd of TRUTHOUT recently.

ICE and the Israeli Military Are 2 Sides of the Same Coin — We Must Resist Both

Excerpts:

In 2017, Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) launched the Deadly Exchange campaign to sever the decades-long collaboration between U.S. law enforcement and the Israeli military.

JVP said its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests revealed that well over a thousand police, sheriffs and federal agents, including the FBI, ICE, and Homeland Security, had flown to Israel for training in surveillance, racial profiling, crowd control, detention, and deportation.

In 2018, Researching the American-Israeli Alliance (RAIA), in partnership with JVP, produced “Deadly Exchange: The Dangerous Consequences of American Law Enforcement in Israel.”

In this report, the authors examined how U.S. law enforcement in Israel studied visual monitoring in public places, internet surveillance, racial profiling of communities of color, treatment of protesters as enemy combatants and coordination of media reporting on state-sponsored violence.

Eran Efrati, then executive director of RAIA, told  Al Jazeera in 2020 that U.S. law enforcement who travelled to Israel witnessed

“live demonstrations of repressive violence in real-time, in protests across the West Bank, patrols in East Jerusalem, and visits to the Gaza border.”

This was not an intercontinental Zoom call. This was on-the-ground modeling and information sharing. Efrati told Al Jazeera,

“Delegates meet with the Shin Bet and chief officers in Israeli military prisons to discuss investigation tactics, with Palestinian Authority agents and police, to learn about how Israel uses their collaboration in suppressing Palestinian dissent.”

JVP’s FOIA requests revealed that, in 2015, Peter Edge, then the associate director of ICE’s Homeland Security Investigations, accepted an invitation from the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to attend a “counterterrorism” seminar in Israel.

FOIA requests also turned up ADL documents in which Edge, prior to visiting Israel, said he was looking forward to “learning more about how the law enforcement community manages perpetual and elevated threat levels, both internally and from neighboring countries, how/whether they are effective, and how those techniques can be applied more broadly.”

Invoking Biblical Claims

Both the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the Israeli Ministry of Defense exploit religious doctrine to legitimize their aims and couch their crimes in lofty yet chilling language.

[…]

Big Tech and Zionism

Ethnic supremacists in Israel and the United States rely on the tech behemoths — Google, Palantir, Amazon, Microsoft, and Elbit Systems, Israel’s largest weapons developer — to surveil the movements of Palestinians in Israel and the occupied territories, as well as the movements of immigrant communities and Palestinian rights activists in the United States.

Since 2008, the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE and CBP, has signed $235 million in contracts with Elbit Systems. That includes a $23.9 million contract with Elbit’s U.S. subsidiary for new surveillance towers, complete with cameras and radar systems, for an integrated virtual border wall, awarded during former President Joe Biden’s tenure.

Google’s 86,000-square-foot Tel Aviv campus, featuring panoramic views, colorful rooms and recessed lighting, occupies eight floors of a building with a mythological name: Electra Tower, named after the Greek mythological figure. In the Oresteia trilogy, Electra plots with her brother to kill their mother for conspiring to kill their father.

Follow the money all the way to the Arizona-Mexico border.

In April 2025, The Intercept reported that Google will collaborate with the Trump administration to provide a central database for video surveillance at an upgraded “50 towers with up to 100 cameras across 6 sites in the Tucson Sector.”

Although CPB is tasked with arresting immigrants at the border, the agency also shares its data with ICE for abductions, detentions, and deportations in the interior, 100 miles from the Mexican border.

Co-founded by billionaire Trump supporter Peter Thiel, Palantir collaborates with intelligence agencies and the Department of Defense for war and surveillance.

In June 2025, the Department of Defense, according to The Software Report, signed a $1.3 billion contract for Palantir’s Project Maven, which analyzes drone footage of so-called enemy combatants to

“enable units to make hundreds of real-time decisions per hour using AI-driven tools.”

Paragon Solutions

Meanwhile, Amnesty International in Europe is sounding the alarm over Paragon Solutions’s Graphite spyware, which the human rights group says targets journalists by infecting electronic devices to access text messages.

Ehud Barak, the former Prime Minister of Israel, co-founded Paragon with Ehud Schneorson, a former commander of the Israeli military’s cyber warfare agency Unit 8200. Undeterred, the Trump administration announced in 2025 that it will move ahead on a stalled contract with Paragon Solutions for spyware to hack into cell phones and read messages on encrypted apps like Signal.

[…]

Via https://healthimpactnews.com/2025/ice-agents-in-the-u-s-are-trained-by-israeli-defense-forces-idf-and-use-israeli-spyware-to-hack-americans-phones/

Blandine Sankara: “Agroecology Form of Resistance and Decolonization”

Youth in Burkina Faso plant cropsYelemani Association works towards food sovereignty in Burkina Faso. Photo: BdF

Pedro Stropasolas

Founded by Thomas Sankara’s sister, Yelemani Association inspires the fight against desertification in Burkina Faso.

In Burkina Faso, agroecology flourishes as an act of resistance. In a country where more than 80% of the active population makes their living off agriculture, peasant movements and social organizations have defended the production of healthy food and food self-sufficiency as a path to liberation from the wounds left by French neocolonialism.

Leading this effort is the Yelemani Association, founded in 2009 by Blandine Sankara, sister of revolutionary leader and former president Thomas Sankara, who governed the country from 1983 to 1987, when he was assassinated.

The word Yelemani means “change” or “transformation” in the Dyula language, the second most spoken language in Burkina Faso. The name summarizes the organization’s proposal: to change the relationship between people, land, and food, valuing local resources and restoring the dignity of the peasant world.

At the center of this project is agroecology, seen not only as a production technique, but as an anticolonial instrument. For Blandine, cultivating in an agroecological way is resisting the dominant economic model that puts profit above human life.

“We really see these two concepts, food sovereignty and agroecology, as forms of resistance to the economic model, and also as a form of decolonization,” states Sankara.

Based on four pillars: production, valorization of local products, training, and political advocacy, Yelemani has become a reference in the country. It has recovered degraded lands, created a peasant seed bank, trained hundreds of farmers and students, and has been at the forefront of national mobilizations against GMOs and foreign corporations, such as Monsanto and the Bill Gates Foundation.

In an interview with Brasil de Fato, Blandine Sankara talks about the trajectory of the Yelemani Association, the results achieved, and the challenges faced by agroecology in the Sahel country.

“What I have to say is that agroecology is increasingly at the center of agriculture and policies. I’ll talk about agricultural policies in Burkina Faso because today we have a national strategy. This is rare. A country that has a national strategy in the field of agroecology,” she reflects.

Brasil de Fato: Blandine, can we start by talking a bit about how agroecology entered your life and how the Yelemani Association came about?

Blandine Sankara: First of all, it’s important to say that the Yelemani Association was created in 2009. And especially that Yelemani means “change” or “transformation” in the second most spoken language of Burkina Faso, Dyula.

And what does this change mean? For us, it’s the valorization of local resources, to guarantee the dignity of the peasant world and build our daily well-being. It’s not just about peasants. It’s about the dignity of the peasant, on one hand, but also about building the well-being of every Burkinabe citizen.

This is the first explanation about the name Yelemani. The organization focuses on agriculture and food. Our work is directed toward these two fields, which are broad, because they touch all aspects of life, after all, they concern all of us. And in a country like ours, where more than 80% of the active population works in agriculture, this is a central field, because food concerns everyone.

Parallel to change through valorization of local resources and the peasant world, we speak of a transformation of mentality and behaviors. Even though in agroecology we work to produce healthy food and teach cultivation techniques alongside peasants, if there isn’t a change in the mentality of consumers, of all of us, we don’t advance.

This change is also a change of behavior and deconstruction of prejudiced ideas about our own products. So there are two transformations we seek: one in production and another in mentalities.

Here at Yelemani, we promote food sovereignty and the practice of agroecology. It’s clear that with the rejection of the use of GMOs, chemical fertilizers and pesticides. This is our work. Promoting food sovereignty through agroecology and refusing the chemical model.

We see all of this as a form of resistance to the economic model that puts profit above human life. This is the guiding thread of our activities and our daily life. It’s our vision. We really see these two concepts, food sovereignty and agroecology, as forms of resistance to the economic model, and also as a form of decolonization.

Not only of what is on our plates and on our lands, the seeds, but also of our spirits. Because, as I usually say, there has been a colonization of mentalities, a kind of violation of our own power to act. To resist is also to refuse that our fields, markets and kitchens are invaded by imported products, hybrid seeds, pesticides and even by flavors and norms that are not ours.

This is Yelemani’s fight, its mark among the organizations that work for food sovereignty and agroecology in Burkina Faso.

At a certain point in our lives, we lived through the Revolution in Burkina Faso in the 1980s, an experience that deeply marked us. Those who were young at the time, students or even pupils, participated in or witnessed what was at stake in the country.

In my case, I studied sociology and had many opportunities to go to villages and regions of Burkina, which made me understand the realities of the peasant world. Later, in Geneva, during my development studies, I deepened this understanding. It was the era of globalization, of economic partnership agreements, and we closely followed the debates.

Another important factor was the period from 2008 to 2011, when we lived through what was called the “high cost of living crisis”, with the surge in prices of basic products worldwide, linked to the increase in oil barrel prices. There were protests in Ouagadougou and several cities across the country against the increase in food prices.

All of this led us to the conclusion that it was necessary to move toward food sovereignty. Not just as a concept, but as practice. We began experimenting with this in 2009, and it was especially from 2012 that we effectively began our activities.

BdF: What can you tell us about the activities you’ve been developing at Yelemani since 2009 and their results?

BS: We work on four main areas. First, the production and transformation of agroecological fruits and vegetables in Lumbila, which is about 30 km from Ouagadougou. There, there are three plots with production, and it’s mainly women who work. Internally displaced women. What we call internally displaced are people who were expelled from their homes due to terrorism.

The second is the valorization and promotion of local food products. Because it’s not enough to produce, we must value what is ours, this is part of the fight for food decolonization.

Then, there’s education and training on agroecology and food sovereignty, because we think that even if we do good work in terms of production and transformation to offer healthy products and everything else, if the consumer, especially young people, aren’t sensitized, we won’t have results. It won’t be a profound change. So, this is the third axis and we’re working in schools.

But it’s also necessary to work on policies, so we added the fourth area, which is advocacy with political decision-makers so they decide to take agroecology into account.

Among the results, the first was the recovery of abandoned soil in Lumbila, considered unproductive. In one year, we managed to regenerate the land with agroecological practices. We also created a local products market and, since 2023, a peasant seed bank, where farmers can withdraw seeds and return double after harvest, without commercial transactions.

Another important result is the production of pedagogical material. Since 2015 we’ve developed training modules on agroecology and food sovereignty (12 in total) and trained farmers, students, and teachers.

We also had political victories, such as the expulsion of Monsanto in 2015, after a national mobilization against GMOs, and in 2018, a campaign that managed to block the “Target Malaria” project, funded by the Bill Gates Foundation, which planned to release genetically modified mosquitoes.

In 2019, during FESPACO (Pan-African Film Festival of Ouagadougou), we managed to break the monopoly of a French company that prevented the sale of local juices at the event. After popular pressure, a decree authorized local producers to sell their beverages.

But the greatest result for us remains the recovery of abandoned and unproductive land in Lumbila, a symbol of what agroecology can achieve.

BdF: With the end of the revolution in the 1980s, there was a rupture in the path of food self-sufficiency developed by Thomas Sankara. Multinational companies, mainly French ones, and global agribusiness, recovered their presence, developing a form of agriculture that doesn’t collaborate and, in a way, aggravates the problem of desertification in the Sahel. How do you see the effects of colonization on the agrarian question in your country?

BS: It must be said that it was really during colonization that capitalism penetrated the traditional agricultural sector, forcing the modernization of an agriculture considered backward and subsistence, which was forced to evolve into commercial and mechanized agriculture. At that moment, emphasis was placed on crops destined for export, what were called cash products and cash crops.

Therefore, in Burkina’s case, it was peanuts, but especially cotton and, to a lesser extent, also green beans. When we look at the country today, there’s a large area of land, thousands of hectares of land that were destroyed by the use of these chemical inputs for production mainly of cotton. These are thousands of hectares that today need to be recovered. They need to be restored.

The richest zones, the most fertile lands, were used for cotton cultivation, with excessive use of chemicals to produce more and sell more. Therefore, it was really for export, they were export products to other continents, mainly to France.

There are also floods caused by rains, with the loss of seeds, which forces farmers to go into debt to buy new seeds. Therefore, there were many consequences because of this export culture.

In the 2000s, cotton cultivation was done with great support from Monsanto, which I mentioned earlier, the American company. It made producers believe that the harvest would be more profitable with transgenic cotton, without additional insecticide and with better yield.

We can even say that there was an agricultural and food colonization, and that it never ended. The great powers and multinationals continue to exploit the same mechanisms.

That’s what they told our producers. In 2009, this cotton was profitable in the first three years, but very quickly farmers had to go back to using insecticides because the quality of cotton deteriorated and the quantity was also not as expected, it wasn’t up to standard. And that’s not all. It also destroys neighboring crops, not just cotton, but crops that were alongside, like sesame, for example, which was totally destroyed.

And all of this in conditions of climate degradation in Burkina. Therefore, the application of these policies in the agricultural sector led to the total loss of our food autonomy and local knowledge, and even food security increased with the devaluation of food crops for the benefit of these crops.

[…]

Via https://libya360.wordpress.com/2025/11/26/blandine-sankara-agroecology-is-a-form-of-resistance-and-decolonization/

No, the six-year-old Mennonite girl in Texas did not die of measles

Parents of girl, 6, who died from measles stand by decision to not ...
Dr Pierre Kory

[T]his case [of six-year-old Kayley Fehr in Texas] was tragic and really had nothing, I shouldn’t say nothing to do with measles. But she did not die of measles by any stretch of the imagination. In fact, she died of a pneumonia. But it gets worse than that because she didn’t really die of the pneumonia. She died of a medical error. And that error was a completely inappropriate antibiotic. It was an insufficient antibiotic.

And in reviewing cases, I’ve reviewed cases of pneumonias that went unrecognized or mistreated. And normally when you review a case, it’s difficult to pinpoint blame unless you know exactly what the organism was. And in this case, we did know what the organism was. She died of mycoplasma.

And the tragedy is that mycoplasma is an extremely common what we call immunity acquired organism. This is very commonly circulating in the community. It causes pneumonias. And when you admit someone to the hospital for pneumonia, what you need to do is you treat what’s called empirically, meaning you put them on antibiotics that you think will cover the most common organism.

And that’s why this case is absolutely enraging. It’s infuriating because she died because she got an inappropriate antibiotic. The most common antibiotics that we use, it’s in every guideline. Infectious disease, pulmonary. Every guideline in the country tells you that for a hospitalized child or adult who gets admitted to the hospital, you put them on two antibiotics. One is from a category called beta lactams, which is like penicillin, cephalosporins.

And they got that part correct. They put her on something called ceftriaxone, which was excellent. But you always need to pair it with an antibiotic from a different category, which is called a macrolide or a quinolone. And they did neither of those things. They didn’t put her on the most common, which is azithromycin.

The tragedy is that mycoplasma is an organism that doesn’t have a cell wall. Penicillins and cephalosporins work by disrupting the organism cell wall. But if you don’t have a cell wall, you need a different mechanistic antibiotic, which is azithromycin, which interrupts the protein synthesis and messes with the formation of proteins in the ribosome. But I don’t want to get too geeky with that. I mean, this is like medicine 101. You put them on two antibiotics to cover all the possibilities.

And unfortunately, this case gets a lot worse than that because not only did they use an inappropriate antibiotic, so they used ceftriaxone, which was correct. They added something called vancomycin to it, which works similarly. And it covers very drug resistant organisms like MRSA. There’s no reason to think that this child would come in with MRSA from the community, from a Mennonite community. She’s not coming from a facility where a lot of antibiotics are used. So it was a really a grievous error, and it’s an error which led to her death.

And so when I say it gets worse, she’s in the hospital deteriorating. One of the fundamental teaching points that I’ve made throughout my career to my residents, to my fellows, to my students, is I always tell them, if what you’re doing is not working, change what you’re doing. Although this child was declining, they never changed what they were doing until the test came back from mycoplasma.

This is where it gets really troubling because as an ICU doctor, when I need a new antibiotic, I uncover, identify an organism in someone who’s critically ill when I order that antibiotic. That antibiotic has standards, it should arrive within at least two hours. And from my review of the records, the A\antibiotic was ordered 11pm, approximately 11 pm and as far as I can tell, it was not administered until 9 am the next morning. It was actually written to start the next day.

And so not only did you have several days delay of decline without the appropriate antibiotic, but then when they realized that they were missing the appropriate antibiotic, it took them, as far as I can tell, 10 hours to administer it. And by that time she was already on a ventilator. And approximately 24 hours later, actually less than 24 hours later, she died. And she died rather catastrophically.

As she was declining, she was in a state of what’s called shock and she needed medicines to maintain her blood pressure. And suddenly her blood pressures crashed and she arrested. And that kind of suddenness in an infection suggest some other cardiac event. And in a child like that, with that amount of inflammation, infection and disturbances in the bloodstream, I can only surmise that she died of a catastrophic pulmonary embolism.

But by the time that happened, there’s not a lot you can do. There’s some stuff you can do, you can use clot busting medications. And I’ve done that in the middle of cardiac arrest before and I’ve had a couple of rescues, but it’s not a high probability that you do that. But rather than focusing on that final event that caused her death, it really was all of the missteps that occurred.

And so she was recovering from measles, getting a secondary bacterial pneumonia. Let me give the hospital some credit. They correctly diagnosed her, they very quickly on admission realized that she was coming in with a secondary bacterial pneumonia. And I think that was an absolutely correct diagnosis. The treatment was absolutely incorrect. And this, when I say it has little to do with measles… secondary bacterial pneumonias can happen after any viral infection. And so this is, not everyone’s grandstanding.

And all this outrage over this measles. You see, the media is going nuts about how everyone needs to get vaccinated. I would tell you just simple, straightforward, correct medical care. We’ve been treating pneumonias for decades with antibiotics. And this was Just a tragic error of an insufficient and incorrect antibiotic regimen on admission.

[…]

Via https://vaccinesbytheoutliers.wordpress.com/2025/11/26/no-the-six-year-old-mennonite-girl-in-texas-did-not-die-of-measles/

Facebook turned blind eye to sex trafficking

Meta turned blind eye to sex trafficking – court filings

RT

Company policy allowed 16 violations, such as adults soliciting minors, before it suspended accounts

Facebook’s parent company, Meta, failed to promptly act on accounts engaged in sex trafficking by allowing illicit content to remain on its platforms despite repeated violations, recently unsealed court filings show.

The accusation is part of a lawsuit filed in California by more than 1,800 plaintiffs – including school districts, children and parents, and state attorneys general – alleging that social media giants “relentlessly pursued a strategy of growth at all costs, recklessly ignoring the impact of their products on children’s mental and physical health.” Alongside Meta – which owns Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Threads – the suit targets Google’s YouTube, ByteDance’s TikTok, and Snap’s Snapchat.

Former Instagram safety chief Vaishnavi Jayakumar testified she was shocked to learn that Meta maintained a “17-strike” policy for accounts allegedly involved in human sex trafficking.

“You could incur 16 violations for prostitution and sexual solicitation, and upon the 17th violation, your account would be suspended,” she said, calling the threshold “very, very high” by industry standards.

The brief alleges Meta was aware of serious harms on its platforms, including millions of adult strangers contacting minors, products that worsened teen mental-health issues, and frequent detection – but rare removal – of content related to suicide, eating disorders and child sexual abuse.

Responding to the allegations, Meta told USA Today it now enforces a “one strike” policy and immediately removes accounts involved in human exploitation, saying its former 17-strike system has been replaced.

The company has come under mounting scrutiny in the US. Earlier this year, reports that Meta’s AI chatbots could engage minors in sensual exchanges led to new safeguards for teen accounts, giving parents the option to block interactions with the bots.

Meta is also confronting expanding legal and regulatory challenges globally. Russia designated the firm an “extremist organization” in 2022 for refusing to remove prohibited content. The tech giant is facing multiple actions in the EU, including a €797 million antitrust fine tied to Facebook Marketplace, as well as separate copyright, data-protection and targeted advertising cases in Spain, France, Germany, and Norway.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/business/628472-meta-sex-trafficking-lawsuit/