The Most Revolutionary Act

Uncensored updates on world events, economics, the environment and medicine

The Most Revolutionary Act

Pennsylvania Court Rules Amish Farmer Amos Miller Can Continue Operations Outside the State Despite FDA’s Overreach on ‘Food Safety Laws’

Credit: @TheLanPatriot screenshot

Jim Hoft

Amish farmer Amos Miller of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, has been authorized to continue his farming operations following a protracted legal battle with state and federal authorities over the sale of raw milk and other unpasteurized dairy products.

The Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) initiated legal action against Miller, alleging violations of state food safety laws due to the sale of raw milk without the requisite permits.

The Gateway Pundit reported earlier this year that several government officials stormed into a building on Amos Miller’s Lancaster County organic farm and conducted an illegal hours-long raid without notice, eventually leaving with multiple coolers containing the Amish farmer’s property.

The Lancaster Patriot reported the ‘search’ was performed by the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture employees with three Pennsylvania State policemen aiding them.

PDA claimed in the affidavit that Miller failed to file applications from the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture “for registration, licensing, or permitting under the pertinent Retail Food Facility Safety Act, Food Safety Act, or Milk Sanitation Laws.”

The Lancaster Patriot obtained footage of the officials executing the search at Miller’s organic farm. In the first video, a Patriot reporter is confronted by a cop and pushed outside once they learn he is a media member.

BREAKING: Footage of search warrant being executed on Amos Miller’s organic farm operations in Lancaster County, PA. (For more info on the ongoing saga, visit: https://t.co/uB5pbpnlhS) pic.twitter.com/U64ft05x0F

— The Lancaster Patriot (@TheLanPatriot) January 4, 2024

Exclusive footage of state agents leaving Amos Miller’s organic farm store, carrying off some of his products. pic.twitter.com/yVAHSmr1WH

— The Lancaster Patriot (@TheLanPatriot) January 4, 2024

A report of seized property provided to Miller revealed the officials seized 37 types of foods, including sour cream, chocolate milk, ice cream, and eggnog. They also took food from a walk-in cooler door, which contains hundreds of items and represents a significant portion of Miller’s products.

In March 2024, Judge Thomas Sponaugle of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas issued an injunction prohibiting Miller from selling raw milk products to the public without a permit.

In October 2024, Amos Miller’s attorney, Robert Barnes, argued in Commonwealth Court in Pittsburgh that the Pennsylvania farmer should be permitted to sell raw milk to out-of-state customers while facing legal action from the state.

Barnes contended that Pennsylvania’s milk regulations are designed to safeguard in-state consumers, and applying these laws to out-of-state sales raises constitutional concerns.

On Friday, Barnes announced on X that the court has allowed Miller to sell his raw milk products to out-of-state customers.

“Big win today for Food Freedom as Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the trial court decision allowing Amish farmer Amos Miller to continue to make his wonderful food available to customers outside the state. Thank you to everyone who spoke out for Amos!” he wrote.

Big win today for #FoodFreedom as Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the trial court decision allowing #Amish farmer #AmosMiller to continue to make his wonderful food available to customers outside the state. Thank you to everyone who spoke out for Amos!

— Robert Barnes (@barnes_law) January 4, 2025

[…]

Via https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/01/pennsylvania-court-rules-amish-farmer-amos-miller-can/

New Evidence Reveals 30 Year Global Drop in Hurricane Frequency and Power

Chris Morrison

Last month a small but powerful cyclone named Chido made landfall in Mayotte before sweeping into Mozambique, causing considerable damage and leading to the loss of around 100 lives. Days after the tragedy, the Green Blob-funded Carbon Brief noted that scientists have “long suggested” that climate change is making cyclones worse in the region, while Blob-funded World Weather Attribution (WWA) at Imperial College London made a near-instant and curiously precise estimate that a Chido-like cyclone was about 40% more likely to happen in 2024 than during the pre-industrial age. Not to be outdone, Green Blob-funded cheerleader the Guardian chipped in with the obligatory “cyclones are getting worse because of the climate emergency”. Almost unnoticed, it seems, among all the Net Zero dooming and grooming was a science paper published during December by Nature that found no increase in the destructive power of cyclones – the generic term for typhoons and hurricanes – in any ocean basin over the last 30 years. In the South Indian basin, the location of cyclone Chido, there was a dramatic decrease in both frequency and duration in recent times.

Reality rarely gets much of a look-in these days when fanatical Net Zero activism is afoot, but the paper, written by a group of Chinese meteorologists, makes its case by considering the facts and the data. The scientists apply a “power dissipation index” (PDI) which they consider superior to single measure indicators since it combines storm intensity, duration and frequency. The graphs below show the cumulative index for tropical cyclones across all ocean basins along with a global indication.

Downward trends in the cumulative PDI can be seen in a number of Pacific regions, while the trend holds steady in the North Atlantic. The southern Indian ocean downward trend is particularly pronounced while the overall global line is also heading in a similar direction.

So why does all this scientific twaddle get written by the  green activists in mainstream media? Much of it arises from the new pseudoscience that claims it can tie individual weather events to human-caused climate change. Press releases peddling climate Armageddon are issued days after a natural disaster and are eagerly reprinted by activist journalists promoting the Net Zero fantasy. The distinguished science writer Roger Pielke Jr. is a fierce critic of this new pseudoscience, which he calls weather attribution alchemy. In a recent Substack post in the aftermath of Chido, he noted that the WWA at Imperial College simply assumes the conclusion that it seeks to prove by accepting that every storm is made stronger because of warmer oceans. Using this explanation, continues Pielke, it is straightforward to conclude that the storm was made more likely due to climate change. Or as Imperial states: “The difference in the storm intensity and likelihood of this storm intensity between the counterfactual climate and today’s climate can be attributed to climate change.”

As the new Chinese paper shows, the matter is not quite so simple. Pielke notes that tropical storms encounter numerous environmental influences such as vertical wind shear and storm-induced ocean surface cooling, even when they remain over warmer waters. “Such complexities mean that simple storyline attribution – warmer oceans predictably mean stronger storms – is inappropriate when used to characterise the behaviour of individual storms,” he argues. Pielke also comes down hard on the statistical evidence backing the WWA claims. Even if storms such as Chido were more likely in the future, it would take a very long time to detect a significant change using the threshold 90% confidence set down by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). And by very long time, he means thousands of years.

“Perhaps that is why assumptions are favoured over evidence,” suggests Pielke.

There were plenty of assumptions on display in a now routine end-of-year weather report from the BBC headed: ‘A year of extreme weather that challenged billions.‘ Written by Esme Stallard, it claims that record-breaking heat brought extreme weather including hurricanes and month-long droughts. Pride of place is given to Dr. Friederike Otto, lead of WWA and Senior Lecturer in Climate Science at Imperial, who claimed: “We are living in a dangerous new era – extreme weather caused unrelenting suffering.” “The impacts of fossil fuel warming has never been clear or more devastating than in 2024,” she added.

The redoubtable Paul Homewood is unimpressed with Stallard’s opening line about increasing extreme weather and has filed a complaint with the BBC. Stallard goes on to list a handful of random events, “but fails to provide any evidence that these are anything other than natural events which happen all the time”, states Homewood. “Nor is any evidence provided that such events have been getting more frequent or extreme over time,” he adds.

The BBC story highlighted typhoons in the Philippines as well as hurricane Beryl and stated that such events may be increasing in intensity due to climate change. Official data do not show any evidence of them becoming more powerful over time, notes Homewood. Much play was made of a recent drought in the Amazon, but Homewood points out that the World Bank Climate Portal reveals that rainfall has increased in the area by 5% over the last 30 years. Throughout the report, observes Homewood, the BBC bases its claims on weather attribution computer models. “However, computer models are not evidence, and can be manipulated to provide whatever results are desired. That is why they are widely derided by the wider scientific community,” he states.

For Roger Pielke, extreme weather attributions are “puzzling”. The most charitable explanation for their proliferation is that there is a demand for them, including from many in the media. The demand will be filled by someone, he concludes. “A less charitable explanation is that there is a systematic effort underway to contest and undermine actual climate science, including the assessments of the IPCC, in order to present a picture of reality that is simply false in support of climate advocacy. We might call that pseudo-scientific gaslighting,” he suggests.

[…]

Via https://dailysceptic.org/2025/01/04/climate-bombshell-new-evidence-reveals-30-year-global-drop-in-hurricane-frequency-and-power/

BRICS expands with 9 new partner countries. Now it’s half of world population, 41% of global economy

BRICS keeps expanding, adding 9 partner countries in January 2025, after admitting 4 new members in 2024. It now makes up roughly half of the global population and more than 41% of world GDP (PPP). It’s an economic powerhouse, with top producers of key commodities like oil, gas, grains, meat, and minerals.

BRICS, the Global South-led forum for economic cooperation, continues to grow in influence, as its seeks to de-dollarize and transform the international monetary and financial system.

After admitting four new members in 2024, BRICS officially welcomes nine new nations as partner countries on January 1, 2025. They are:

  • Belarus
  • Bolivia
  • Cuba
  • Indonesia
  • Kazakhstan
  • Malaysia
  • Thailand
  • Uganda
  • Uzbekistan

With its nine members and nine partners, BRICS now makes up roughly half of the global population and more than 41% of world GDP (PPP).https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2024/12/25/brics-expands-9-partner-countries-population-economy/

[…]

Via https://theconfirmationfiles.com/2025/01/05/brics-expands-with-9-new-partner-countries-now-its-half-of-world-population-41-of-global-economy/

‘Moderate’ New Islamist Syrian Rulers Publicly Humiliate German Foreign Minister By Refusing to Shake Her Hanrd

 

Paul Sarran

It’s no wonder the failed German coalition led by outgoing chancellor Olaf Scholz is such a train wreck: at the same time that they want to lecture the world on their failed Globalist policies and prejudices, they wanted to jump the gun and be one of the first states to send top-level officials to engage with the ‘moderate’ new Islamist Syrian rulers – and they sent a woman to try to do the job, FM Annalena Baerbock..

Rarely was a disaster so predictable.

BILD reported (translated from German):

“Annalena Baerbock’s visit to Syria on Friday has another aftermath: In Damascus, the new ruler Ahmed al-Sharaa did not shake hands with the Federal Foreign Minister at first – unlike her male companions.

Now comes the next discrimination: Islamist news channels from the environment of the new rulers spread photos of Baerbock’s visit – and censor the German politician in the process!”

The humiliation began at her arrival at Damascus airport: Syrians did not shake her hand – so she shook the hands of German officials instead, with gusto!

Baerbock then met new Syrian ruler Ahmad al-Sharaa also did not shake hands with the Minister.

But things were about to get even worse:

“The news channel Almharar distributed photos on Telegram in which the Federal Foreign Minister was made unrecognizable by obfuscation.”

[…]

Via https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/01/moderate-new-islamist-rulers-syria-publicly-humiliate-german/

Bill Gates Vows to Use Mosquitoes As “Flying Vaccinators” Against Anti-Vaxxers

Bill Gates vows to use mosquitoes as flying vaccinators in fight against bird flu.

The Peoples Voice

Bill Gates has announced plans to mass vaccinate anti-vaxxers using flying mosquitoes carrying the new bird flu mRNA vaccine.

The Gates initiative is being conducted by researchers at Leiden University Medical Centre in the Netherlands.  The goal is to mass vaccinate the planet by using these mosquitoes to administer vaccines “with or without public consent.”

Expose-news.com reports: Critics have raised concerns about safety, informed consent and unintended ecological impacts.

In November 2024 a study by Leiden University Medical Center  (“LUMC”) was published in the New England Journal of Medicine which concluded that mosquitoes could be used as “flying vaccinators.”

According to the paper, the study was “supported by a donation from the Bontius Foundation.” This doesn’t tell us very much as the Bontius Foundation, also known as Bontius Stichting LUMC Research Foundation, funds and supports finding additional funding for scientific research at LUMC.

However, for years the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has supported LUMC’s research.  The Foundation granted LUMC   $1,578,317 in September 2023  and another $2,287,871 in November 2024 for its malaria programme.

In LUMC’s study, 43 adults aged 19 to 35 with no prior malaria history were divided into three groups. Each group received bites from mosquitoes carrying either the GA2 parasite, the GA1 parasite or no parasite (placebo).

The participants underwent three rounds of vaccination by mosquito, spaced 28 days apart. Three weeks after the final round, all participants were exposed to malaria through bites from infected mosquitoes. The results showed that eight out of nine participants in the GA2 group were successfully protected against malaria, compared to only one out of eight in the GA1 group and none in the placebo group.

The Dutch researchers now seek to replicate their results in a larger human trial.

While it is claimed this method shows promise in combating malaria, it has raised ethical concerns regarding informed consent and medical safety. Critics argue that bypassing traditional vaccination methods and consent procedures could be ethically unacceptable and set a dangerous precedent.

The concept of using mosquitoes as “flying vaccinators” is not new. In 2010, Japanese researcher Shigeto Yoshida modified mosquito saliva to deliver leishmania vaccines to mice, noting that vaccination by insect could be painless and cost-effective. However, Yoshida also acknowledged that medical safety issues and concerns about informed consent mitigate the use of this method for vaccine delivery.

Watch:

Countdown to European Collapse

European Disintegration | Crescent International | Monthly News ...
 
 
Lucas Leiroz

With the ban on the flow of Russian gas to Europe through Ukrainian territory, little remains before the absolute economic and social collapse of the European continent.

Finally, energy cooperation between Russia and Europe is (almost) completely over. After nearly three years of sanctions and sabotage, the bilateral Moscow-EU energy partnership suffered its greatest historical blow. Kiev fulfilled its promise not to extend its contract with Gazprom, which was allowing the arrival of Russian gas to Europe, then creating an extremely uncomfortable energy insecurity situation for its own “partners” in the European Union.

On the morning of the first day of 2025, the Russian Federation stopped supplying gas to European buyers via Ukraine. Even amidst the conflict, the Russian Gazprom and Ukrainian Naftogaz had kept in operation an energy transit agreement signed in 2020, which expired on the last day of 2024. Previously, Kiev had already announced it was unwilling to renew the contract with Gazprom, although some European countries repeatedly asked Ukraine to do so.

Despite the sanctions imposed on Russia since 2022, some European countries continued benefiting from the import of Russian gas, particularly Slovakia and Hungary – nations that refused to participate in the Western-sponsored anti-Russian boycott – as well as Austria, a country historically neutral in Europe’s geopolitical and military disputes. Other nations, even adhering to the sanctions, continued hypocritically receiving Russian gas, such as Italy, Poland, Romania, and Moldova. There were also cases of gas resale, with receiving nations re-exporting the commodity to countries seeking to bypass the sanctions.

With the end of the Ukrainian route, all these states lost any guarantee of a safe energy source – precisely during winter, the time of year when gas consumption in Europe is at its highest. Obviously, there are currently energy reserves that may be enough to cope with the challenges of the current season, but the situation will progressively become more critical over time. European nations will have to find new sources of gas or expand the use of the only two remaining routes for Russian gas (via Turkey and the Black Sea). Recent indicators show a substantial rise in gas prices among Asian exporters. Ankara is also expected to take the opportunity to gain more profits from its pipeline.

There is currently hope among Europeans for a cheap gas supply through the long-awaited Qatari-Turkish pipeline project via Syria. With the fall of Bashar al Assad’s legitimate government, energy giants from Turkey and the Gulf have revived the proposal, although they are waiting for domestic pacification in Syria by the Al-Qaeda junta to begin the construction. Some optimistic analysts in Europe believe this would be the antidote to Europe’s dependency on Russian gas – or Asian and American, as in the current circumstances.

The main problem with this hope is believing in the goodwill of the Western hawks to “pacify Syria.” Without Assad, Damascus became a “failed state,” with territory divided between different factions in constant hostilities. It is unlikely this will change – simply because, despite the tactical operators of the Syrian crisis (Turkey and Qatar) wanting pacification, the strategic mentors (Israel and the USA) are not interested. Tel Aviv prefers a polarized and war-torn Syria, unable to do anything to prevent territorial progress in the Golan and beyond. Washington, which is subservient to Israeli interests through the international Zionist lobby, is interested in the same – along with, of course, fostering Kurdish terrorists to worsen the internal Syrian situation even further.

In other words, Western analysts still do not understand that the decision-makers of the unipolar axis simply do not want to solve Europe’s problems. It is not in the US’ interest that its “partners” in Europe regain cheap energy and a strong industrial base. For Washington, the collapse of Europe is not a tragedy but a strategic goal, whose roots lie in the science of geopolitics itself. According to the fundamentals of Western geopolitics, Russian-European integration would be disastrous for the US-UK Atlantic axis. Therefore, in the face of Russia’s imminent military victory and Moscow’s rehabilitation as a Eurasian geopolitical power, the Americans and the British have adopted a “scorched earth” strategy in Europe.

Sanctions, the terrorist attack on Nord Stream, and the closure of the Ukrainian route to Europe are events that are part of the same strategic context: in all these cases, Anglo-American strategists want to provoke an energy collapse in Europe to enable deindustrialization and the subsequent economic and social crisis. The final goal is a ruined Europe, not only unwilling but also incapable of establishing any future strategic ties with Moscow.

With the fall of the Ukrainian gas route, it can be said that the US won an important battle in its economic war against Europe. The total collapse is merely a matter of time.

[…]

Via https://strategic-culture.su/news/2025/01/04/countdown-to-european-collapse/

Top Pfizer owners — Blackrock, Vanguard & State Street — also top shareholders of parent companies of Annalect, hired by NZ’s Govt to spy on Kiwis’ social media

By Steve Snoopman

In this exposé, Steve Snoopman shows the Blackrock-Vanguard-State Street Connection behind New Zealand Government’s out-sourcing of social snooping to the same big three Monopoly Board Players that own Pfizer.

The company hired by the NZ Government to monitor New Zealanders’ social media accounts, produce data analytics and ‘social listening’ reports for the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC) is called Annalect New Zealand.

Annalect is part of the New York-based Omnicom Group — whose top three owners are Vanguard, Blackrock and State Street — and who are also the top three shareholders of Pfizer, the primary pharmaceutical company that has supplied the New Zealand Government with its Covid-19 mRNA-nano ‘vaccine’, Cominarty.

During the Corona Plandemic, one of Omnicom’s advertising agency, Clemenger BBDO, created the NZ Government’s ‘Unite Against Covid-19’ campaign, which contained four functions of ideology that are essential for successful propaganda to brainwash a population.

Key Finding: Under the ‘corporate umbrella’ of Omnicom Media Group (OMG), the NZ Government has been able to manipulate the thoughts, feelings and understandings of the archipelago’s captive population by out-sourcing social snooping to Omnicom, whose top three owners reveal the ‘Blackrock-Vanguard-State Street Connection’ to Pfizer.

State Out-sources Social Snooping to Monopoly Board Players

The top three shareholders of the parent companies that own a company hired by the Government to trove New Zealanders’ social media accounts since the beginning of the Covid lockdowns, are also owned by the top shareholders of the parent companies that are Pfizer’s top owners — Blackrock, Vanguard and State Street.

The company hired by the NZ Government to monitor social media accounts, produce data analytics and ‘social listening’ reports for the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC) is called Annalect New Zealand.

Records of NZ Companies Office state that Annalect New Zealand has been registered as Resolution New Zealand, since 27 May 2020.

Resolution New Zealand’s ultimate holding company is OMG New Zealand Limited,i and in turn OMG NZ Ltd’s ultimate holding company is Omnicom Group Inc, which is a publicly listed company on the New York Stock Exchange.ii

OMG NZ is 50 percent owned by DDB Media Holding New Zealand and 50 percent owned by Clemenger Group.iii

DDB New Zealand is 84% owned by DDB Worldwide, whose total share allocation is registered with DDB Worldwide PTY Australia,iv and their ultimate holding company is Omnicom Group Inc, headquartered in Madison Avenue, New York.v

Clemenger Group Limited — which is the holding company of a group of companies involved in advertising and marketing communication services throughout Australia and New Zealand — is also 74% owned by BBDO Worldwide, which is owned by the Omnicom Group.vi

The top three owners of Omnicom Group Inc are The Vanguard Group Inc, Blackrock Fund Advisors and State Street.

Therefore, the majority owners of Resolution New Zealand (formerly Annalect) is the Omnicom Group, whose top three owners are Vanguard, Blackrock and State Street, which have been shown to be at the core of institutional investors owning stakes across all major transnational corporations that dominate all industries across Western Civilization — as Professor Peter Phillips showed in his 2018 book, Giants: The Global Power Elite. The professor of political sociology at Sonoma State University in the USA, identified twenty asset management firms and banks at the center of global capital: BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, J.P Morgan Chase, Credit Suisse, UBS, Goldman Sachs, Bank of NY Mellon, Bank of America, Barclays, Allianz, Capital Group, Morgan Stanley, AXA, Prudential, Amundi, FMR, Wellington Capital Management, Northern Trust and BNP Paribas.

Indeed, Professor Phillips names Omnicom as one of several propaganda firms specializing in advertising, public relations and marketing to serve the global power élite.

As Wellington-born advertising illustrator, Nick McFarlane, presented in his book, Spinfluence: The Hardcore Propaganda Manual, in order for the brainwashing of spinfluence to work, the targets need to be identified on two levels: with demographics and the heart — to engineer conformity, or group think, to produce desired behavorial modifications.

Because Vanguard, State Street and Blackrock are the top three shareholders of Pfizer, the primary pharmaceutical company that has supplied the New Zealand Government with its Covid-19 mRNA-nano ‘vaccine’, Cominarty, this means the family of companies owned by the Omnicom Group were well suited to produce, enhance, and mass disseminate Corona Cult propaganda

Social Listening, Social Signalling and Social Steering

In a story headlined, “NZers’ social media comments scanned to inform Covid-19 response”, Radio New Zealand reported that OIA released documents showed Annalect surveilled public comments on Facebook, Twitter, Reddit and other sites, about current topics like ‘Covid response’, ‘virus’, ‘vaccine rollout’, ‘economy’, ‘business and consumers’, ‘contact tracing’ and ‘team of five million’, posted by New Zealanders.vii

The website Annalect boasts that it uses Omni, an operating system owned by Omnicom Media Group (OMG), to “orchestrate better outcomes”.viii

The contract with Annalect (Resolution NZ) has been managed by the COVID-19 Group from 1 July 1st 2020 when it took-over from National Crisis Management Centre following the centre’s deactivation on 30 June 2020. The COVID-19 Group was established as a business unit of the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC), and is headed by the COVID-19 Group deputy chief executive, Cheryl Barnes.ix

RNZ reported that Barnes said the reports were first commissioned in April 2020, via OMD, the media buying agency for the Covid-19 Response.

Clemenger Group lists OMD Worldwide as one of its family of companies and brags that it “is a leading media communications agency, with more than 10,000 employees across 100 countries serving some of the world’s highest profile brands.” OMD Worldwide is a unit of Omnicom Media Group, the media services division of Omnicom Group.xi

During the Corona Plandemic, advertising agency Clemenger BBDO created a propaganda advertising campaign called ‘Unite Against Covid-19’ for the New Zealand Government.

Clemenger BBDO claimed the ‘Unite Against Covid-19’ campaign was both a collective story and a “design system centred around our people, not the virus, [that] helped interpret complex changes, established daily routines, and created a consistent source of truth.”

In reality, Clemenger BBO designed its ‘Unite Against Covid-19’ propaganda campaign to assist the Government’s plan to construct a new ideological hegemonic bloc, amid the contagion of fear-porn news that occurred as a consequence of an orchestrated emotional hijacking operation through the syndicated cartelized global news-chain.

Indeed, the four functions of ideology — that are essential for a successful propaganda campaign to brainwash a population — were detectable in the ‘Unite Against Covid-19’ explanatory graphic, supplied on Clemenger BBO’s website.

The legitimation function is evident by the verb, “unite”, which served to “rally people around a unified truth, a unified message and a unified author in a world of uncertainty.” This unification element envisaged front-footing the ‘crisis’ with biased ‘expert voices’, whom supported the narrative’s definitions, problems, and solutions, to the exclusion of counter-factuals, established early treatment protocols, and the views of dissenting scientists, doctors and nurses. In this way, the activation of the ideological legitimation function supported the power of authority by masking over the cracks in the narrative myth-making.

The preposition “against” served the ideological function of activation to face the threat of a common enemy. Quite consciously, Clemenger BBDO, deployed the language of conflict to galvanize a nation to fight the perceived common enemy.

This perceived common enemy — an apparent novel naturally evolved disease called “Covid-19” — served the ideological function of distortion, which is designed to create a warped copy of reality. By claiming to “call-out the enemy”, this “Covid-19” element linked back to the “Unite” element, as a circular argument that failed to present any evidence that could withstand criticism from dissident scientists, doctors and nurses who had not fallen for the scientism.

Packaged into the ‘Unite’ element, was the meme that “we are all in this together”, which performed the essential ideological function of social integration. By seeking to re-cast the rarefied celebrities as folksy mortals, the vox-pops of influencers shot in domestic locations with a ‘skype call’ filming style supply glimpses or vignettes of extraordinary people reduced to ordinary routines, amid ‘the new normal’ of ‘social distancing’, ‘isolation’, and ‘social bubbles’.

These unified message drops served the crucial project of identity re-codification for group integration amid a brazen destabilization, sabotage and re-engineering of Western Civilization.

In these deceptive ways, the New Zealand population was emotionally hijacked through the deployment of propagandist elements as described in Nick Farlane’s 2013 book, Spinfluence: The Hardcore Propaganda Manual. By tapping into ‘the new normal’ zeitgeist amid a climate of fear designed for the subversion of household autonomy, free enterprise and nation state independence, Clemenger BBDO sought to manufacture consent of New Zealanders by constructing a new group consciousness. Without explicitly saying so, such propaganda campaigns are designed to produce a new social hierarchy through social conditioning.

Thus, terminology such as ‘social listening’ used by Annalect was a euphemistic term in place of harvesting the feelings, thoughts and understandings of New Zealanders, who were thought farmed without their knowledge and therefore without their consent. This thought framing was essential in order to better brainwash Kiwis. As McFarlane pointed out, the core techniques of brainwashing include conditions that produce control, isolation, uncertainty, emotional manipulation, and repetition.

Therefore, the New Zealand Government’s hiring of Omnicom’s OMD Worldwide to harvest data of social media communications — while also contracting with Omnicom’s Clemenger BBDO to produce a propagandist advertising, communications and signage campaign — was a shrewd chess move manufacture the consent of naïve Kiwis.

Despite Clemenger BBDO claiming it was creative like children wise beyond their years, the advertising appears to have screened off performing any due diligence to check counter-factuals regarding the sudden hype of a global pandemic designated as such by the World Health Organization — when at the time — the world death toll was under 5000.

Clemenger BBDO ‘failed’ to see that its client, the Government of New Zealand, worsened the real emergency, which involved the dismissal of known therapeutics, fostered a politicization of medicine, public health and personal health choices, and dismissed any counter-voices as conspiracy theorists — while brazenly claiming to be the “single source of truth”. This official state position was geared toward the eventual biased mass deployment of poorly-tested harmful experimental nano-gene injections as the silver bullet solution to an engineered health crisis.

Within this propaganda campaign, Clemenger BBDO also created advertising titled ‘Cover for Each Other’ to manipulate New Zealanders to wear masks to forge “social cohesion” with the brainwashing idea that “your daily sacrifice” overcomes a “selfish act” to abstain — essentially from such virtue-signalling.xii

The propagandist “I Love NZ” signs that continue to re-program humans to believe that by scanning the QR-Codes for entry into premises, they are helping to “protect the things [New Zealanders] love to do too” — were also created by ‘The Work’ creatures at Clemenger BBDO.

Thus, according to Clemenger BBDO “the act of scanning, becomes synonymous with the act of loving New Zealand”, rather than submission to the roll-out of a totalitarian technocratic bio-security system.

[…]

Thus, the Government’s Covid-19 strategy was geared toward maximizing compliance to the lockstep Medical Martial Law measures to reset the nation on to a Techno-Feudalist trajectory. Such a strategy required a plan to maximize high uptake of Covid-19 nano-gene ‘vaccines’. In its selection of Omnicom, the Crown’s All of Government Response was matched with an ‘All of Agency Propaganda’ capacity.

In August 2020, Omnicom Media Group (OMG) and Resolution Digital launched ‘Resolution Kinetic’, in Australia and New Zealand. ‘Resolution Kinetic’ is a Google Marketing Platform service to maximize the full functionality of the platform, solving their business challenges to maximize client’s investments within their technology ‘stacks’.x

In other words, ‘Resolution Kinetic’ paid big money to leverage the Google algorithms to maximize penetration of message dissemination to impregnate minds with the propaganda of ‘Corona Agent’, which is my sarcastic term to denote the agency, or ability to express free-will, that was ripped off humanity during the ‘Great Corona Hostage Crisis’.

[…]

Via https://stevesnoopman.substack.com/p/spy-my-media

Nazi Collaborator George Soros Receives Presidential Medal of Freedom

George Soros admits to having no guilt for stealing property from Jews as they were sent to the death camps in WWII.

Jim Hoft

Joe Biden awarded the Presidential Medals of Freedom to George Soros in a ceremony on Saturday.

[…]

So who is George Soros?

For those of you who are unfamiliar with Soros and his works. He slipped into the US after World War II.

After the war, he was later questioned on ’60 Minutes’ about his ghastly work in Germany during the war collaborating with the Nazis and stealing from Jews on their way to the death camps.

And he held “no remorse” for his actions.

Here is Soros’s famous admission on ’60 Minutes’ in 1998.

Steve Kroft: You’re a Hungarian Jew who escaped the Holocaust by posing as a Christian. You watched lots of people get shipped off to the death camps.

George Soros: I was 14 years old, and I would say that that’s when my character was made.

Steve Kroft: In what way?

George Soros: That one should think ahead, one should understand and anticipate events. And one is threatened. It was a tremendous threat of evil. I mean, it was a very personal experience of evil.

Steve Kroft: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted god’s son. Yes. Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews. That’s right. Yes. That sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult?

George Soros: Not at all. Maybe as a child, you don’t see the connection But it created no problem at all.

Steve Kroft: No feeling of guilt?

George Soros: No.

Steve Kroft: For example, I’m Jewish, and here I am watching these people go, I could just as easily be there. I I could be there. None of that.

George Soros: Well, of course, I could be on the other side, or I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away. But there was no sense that I shouldn’t be there because that was… Well, actually, funny way, it’s just like in markets that if I weren’t there, of course, I wasn’t doing it, but somebody else would be taking it away anyhow. Whether I was there or not, I was only a spectator. The property was being taken away. So I had no role in taking away that property. So I had no sense of guilt.

[…]

The full interview is here.

Via https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/01/reminder-joe-biden-gave-presidential-medal-freedom-george/

Real US History: When US Military in Washington DC Attacked and Killed US Veterans Denied WWI Compensation During Great Depression

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

A period of U.S. history that I was never taught growing up and going through the U.S. educational system, is how the U.S. Government and the U.S. military treated U.S. war veterans who had fought during Word War I during the Great Depression.

Tens of thousands of U.S. veterans from World War I marched to Washington D.C. in 1932, to petition Congress to pay them their compensation for fighting in the War. A bill had been passed in 1924 to do just that, but they had to wait until 1945 to collect that “bonus”, or it could be paid earlier to their family as a death benefit if they died.

Many of them were homeless and destitute, like millions of other Americans, during the Great Depression in 1932.

They literally setup camp in areas around Washington D.C. that year, and their efforts saw some results when the House of Representatives passed a bill to pay them sooner than 1945.

But President Herbert Hoover threatened to veto the bill, and it was overwhelmingly defeated in the Senate.

When the war veterans did not go home, Hoover ordered to have the veterans removed from Washington D.C.

Army Chief of Staff General Douglas MacArthur, along with his assistant Major Dwight D. Eisenhower, usually revered as “heroes” in American history (Eisenhower went on to become President), proceeded to attack and kill some of these U.S. veterans to forcibly remove them from Washington D.C., calling them “communists”. (President Hoover was a “self-made” Wall Street millionaire and a Conservative Republican.)

Hoover lost his re-election bid a few months later, and was replaced by Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR).

I have produced a video that documents these events in 1932, including original film footage and photos, that is only 30 minutes long.

Sources for clips in this video:

The True Story of the 1932 Bonus Army

Bonus Army March Documentary (Aired on PBS)

The Bonus Army, 1932, Mitch Jeserich interviews Paul Dixon

Lessons for Today from U.S. History

“Communist” World War I veterans marching in Washington D.C. in 1932. Source.

The dates and faces may change throughout American history, but some things really do not change at all.

First, the people in Washington D.C. who run the country do NOT serve the American people. They serve the interests of the Globalist Billionaires on Wall Street, and today also in Silicon Valley.

They have no moral problems with killing American citizens to achieve their goals of wealth and power, and it doesn’t matter which political office is currently in power.

We saw this in action most recently during the COVID Scam.

Secondly, they are able to continue on with these crimes against the citizens of the U.S. by dividing people into political groups, so that they always have around 50% of the country supporting them, because they are attacking the other half of the people in this country who belong to the opposing political party.

During the “Bonus Army” protests in D.C. in 1932, this country was able to observe something that is very rare in American history, and that was people from different groups, such as whites and blacks, which was very rare in 1932, overcome their differences to fight a common cause and against a common single enemy – Those ruling in Washington D.C.

And they did it peacefully, until the law enforcement and the U.S. military got involved. The violence originated with the U.S. Government.

Third, the members of the U.S. military take an oath to protect this country, and when you as a military soldier turn your weapons against other citizens of this country to appease the billionaires, you are ALWAYS WRONG.

Brave military personnel stood against the billionaires when they refused mandatory COVID-19 vaccines, and valued truth over their careers and pensions.

These are important principles to keep in mind here at the beginning of 2025, as one political party leaves office, and the other one takes over.

The incoming administration, Conservative Republicans, is already threatening to eliminate free speech on American university and college campuses, by eliminating any groups who oppose the actions of Israel, and if they can get away with it, they will most certainly try the same actions against the entire U.S. population.

The new administration is also already threatening to deploy the military onto American streets, and indeed this is already happening, such as in the subway system of New York City.

The only way to fight tyranny, is to understand who your real enemies are, and they are NOT your fellow citizens who believe differently from you.

[…]

Via https://vaccineimpact.com/2025/real-american-history-when-the-military-in-washington-d-c-attacked-and-killed-american-veterans-who-wanted-to-be-paid-during-the-great-depression/

Former US Special Operations Officer Visits Russian Frontline

Frontline Diary of An American Officer

Directed by Oleg Nekishev and Olga Kiriy

Film Review

Film link: https://en.rtdoc.tv/films/1031-frontline-diary-of-an-american-officer

This documentary follows Lieutenant Scott Bennett, whistleblower and former US Army Special Operations and Psychological Operations Officer (see  https://armypsyop.wixsite.com/shellgame) as he tours Donbas in late 2024.

In the city of Donetsk, he bears witness to the continuing attacks (since 2014*) by Ukrainian forces on local residents and (eg libraries, schools and apartment buildings) and interviews local women unable to leave the house without body armor. Some Ukrainian attacks on Donetsk civilians are personal, for example the girl who had her gut cut in a swastika shape after being raped, tortured and branded.

Bennett also participates in drills with Russian special forces defending Donbas civilians, visits injured Russian soldiers in the hospital and examines their weaponry and the American and European weapons collected from Ukrainian POWS.

The most interesting for me were interviews with a Ukrainian POW and Japanese and South Korean volunteers fighting for the Russian Federation.** The POW, claiming no one in Ukraine wants to join the fight against the Russians, asserts he was kidnapped off the street and sent to the front line. He also talks about draftees in his Azov Battalion agreeing to get Teutonic, Viking and Swastika tattoos after “drug inducement.”

The Japanese volunteer talks about his strong opposition to globalism and George Soros and the Russians being “our only” hope to halt that agenda. He has also seen German, Italian and Colombian volunteers fighting with the Russians.


*Ukrainian citizens in the Donbas region voted overwhelmingly (90%) to join the Russian Federation following the CIA coup in Kiev in 2014.

**All Russian soldiers serving in Donbas are also volunteers.