Press TV

US intelligence reports indicate that Venezuela’s interim president, Delcy Rodríguez, is resisting Washington’s push to realign the country’s foreign partnerships.

The assessments have raised doubts about whether Rodríguez will fully comply with Washington’s demands to sever ties with Iran, China, and Russia.

Venezuela, home to some of the world’s largest proven oil reserves, has become central to Washington’s pressure campaign to curb the influence of rival powers in the Western Hemisphere.

Trump has repeatedly demanded that Caracas expel diplomats and advisers from allied countries.

Representatives from all the three countries attended Rodríguez’s swearing-in earlier this month, following the US raid on the country that led to the kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro on January 3.

In mid-January, the US President Donald Trump claimed he held a “long call” with Rodríguez, describing her as “a terrific person.” He later said the two discussed “many topics,” including oil, minerals, trade and national security, and claimed they had made “tremendous progress.”

Rodríguez, who has said she is working to unify the country after the US abduction of Maduro, has since signaled resistance to Washington’s pressure.

Nearly a month into her interim role, she said Venezuela has had “enough” of US interference.

“Enough already of Washington’s orders over politicians in Venezuela,” Rodríguez told oil workers in the city of Puerto La Cruz on Sunday.

“This republic has paid a very high price for confronting the consequences of fascism and extremism in our country,” she added.

US officials are now developing contacts with senior Venezuelan military and security figures in case Washington decides to change its approach, a source on Venezuela policy told Reuters.

Since the attack on the country, the US has also sought greater access to Venezuela’s energy sector. A senior Trump administration official said the president “continues to exert maximum leverage” and expects cooperation from the country’s leadership.

Washington is also moving to establish a permanent Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) presence inside Venezuela. CNN reported on Tuesday that the agency is quietly expanding its footprint, meeting local officials, monitoring political opponents, and shaping the policies of the new leadership.

The report said that the Trump administration is likely to rely heavily on the CIA to lead the initial re-entry into the country.

Trump has openly acknowledged that a central objective of the military action against Venezuela was control over its oil sector — underscoring a long US history of violence and imperial domination in Latin America.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/01/28/763091/US-intelligence-doubts-Venezuela-interim-leader-leader-Delcy-Rodr%C3%ADguez-cooperation-adversaries-Iran-China-Russia-Oil-resources

By Press TV Staff Writer

What began as legitimate and peaceful economic protests in Iran were swiftly steered by foreign armed and political backing into a “full-scale street war,” according to an analyst.

In an interview with the Press TV website, Mohammad Ghaderi, a Tehran-based political analyst and veteran journalist, said the footprint of foreign actors, specifically the CIA and Mossad, has been clearly evident in the recent riots across Iran.

“The recent events in Iran, which initially began with protests by some shopkeepers and bazaar merchants in Tehran due to the rise in foreign exchange rates, as had been anticipated, were immediately driven by certain trained riot-inciting cells into clashes accompanied by political slogans and anti-security actions,” he said, explaining how protests were hijacked.

“After a few days, following calls by [son of deposed Iranian monarch] Reza Pahlavi and the overt support of [US President Donald] Trump and [Israeli prime minister Benjamin] Netanyahu, they turned into a full-scale street war involving armed terrorists,” he added.

That shift, Ghaderi noted, cannot be understood without separating protesters from those who hijacked their legitimate cause – a legitimate cause even supported by the Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei.

Merchants, he said, had economic complaints but no incentive to escalate toward violence.

“Likewise, law enforcement and security forces not only refrained from violent encounters but in some cases were actively involved in ensuring the security of the protesters,” Ghaderi stated.

The restraint was purposeful, and it lasted even as violence mounted. As rioters began attacking public and private property, police, Basij members, and civilians, officials reported that some of those involved were armed and trained by US and Israeli spy agencies.

“As I mentioned—and as documented evidence also confirms—trained cells linked to foreign agencies and hostile to the Islamic Republic attempted, through extremely violent and terrorist behavior, to provoke the police and law enforcement forces into reacting,” said the veteran journalist.

The numbers that followed underscored the scale of the bloodshed. In a statement issued after the foreign-engineered unrest, Iran’s Foundation of Martyrs and Veterans Affairs said 3,117 people were killed during the riots, including 2,427 civilians and security personnel.

Many were bystanders or protesters shot by organized terrorist elements. Yet, even amid those casualties, Ghaderi pointed to a detail he considers critical to understanding the government’s approach during the riots.

“Until the end of Thursday, January 8,” he remarked, “despite the killing of a significant number of police officers, members of the popular Basij forces, and ordinary civilians by terrorists, no one was killed by police firearms.” Only later, when violence intensified further, did the posture change.

“Of course, on Friday, given the high level of violence carried out by the terrorists, the police, following orders from senior authorities, engaged in armed confrontation with them,” Ghaderi said.

“This clearly shows, first, that the terrorists were armed with various types of cold weapons and firearms, and second, that they had received urban warfare training—both of which confirm that foreign elements directed their organization.”

He described a structure that extended beyond street-level violence. According to Ghaderi, domestic coordinators played a central role in directing attacks, arson, and destruction.

“Inside the country, there were also leaders who were directing the killings and the destruction of public and private property by hired terrorists on the streets,” he stated, adding that many have since been identified and detained. They have confessed that they received their orders directly from abroad.”

Goal of fragmenting Iran

When asked about the strategic objective behind the foreign‑backed riots and terrorism, Ghaderi pointed to Israel’s long‑standing aim of weakening and fragmenting Iran

“Naturally, their ultimate goal is the collapse of the political system and the fragmentation of Iran,” he said. Yet he argues that Tehran has become experienced in confronting such plots.

According to Ghaderi, Iran’s governing institutions have accumulated “valuable experience” over more than forty years of pressure, covert and overt war.

From “hard and military warfare” to sanctions, sabotage, assassination, cyber operations, and “cognitive and perceptual warfare,” the state has faced and adapted to a wide spectrum of challenges.

That history, he noted, has produced “precise and effective models for managing and controlling tensions and shocks like the recent events.”

The result is a persistent failure by Iran’s adversaries to achieve their core aim. “It is precisely for this reason,” Ghaderi said, “that opponents of the Islamic Republic have so far not only failed to defeat Iran’s political system, but have also been unable to separate the people from the governing structure.”

This inability, he argues, explains a strategic shift in Washington. “Fundamentally, in my view, the most important reason behind the US’ shift toward the use of soft power, especially cognitive and perceptual operations, is its inability to separate the people from the government through other methods,” he said.

Instead of tanks or troops, the focus has turned to narratives, distortion, and an effort “to create perceptual errors in the minds of the Iranian people regarding the political system governing them,” said the analyst.

Seen through that lens, the state’s handling of the riots takes on a different logic. Ghaderi said authorities recognized the scenario being played out and responded accordingly.

“With this understanding,” he explained, “the authorities—by accurately grasping the conditions and the scenario designed by the opposition – carried out their security measures with an emphasis on restraint and engagement with protesters, separating rioters from ordinary people, intelligent street-level management, and maximum tolerance.”

The objective, he added, was twofold – “first, to prevent the fabrication of false narratives by hostile media in the public mind, and second, to minimize confrontation and harm between the people and the state.”

None of this, Ghaderi cautioned, means Iran’s path ahead will be easy. He described the country’s future as “a complex and difficult one,” shaped in large part by “obstacles created by Western countries, such as sanctions and economic and international pressure.”

However, he balanced that assessment with structural counterweights, citing “the system’s reliable social capital,” the “indigenization of many fields of knowledge and technology,” and Iran’s expanding regional influence and international partnerships.

The analyst believes that those factors, combined with “the weakness of adversaries in delivering decisive blows,” push the prospect of systemic collapse “close to zero.”

Military threats part of ‘psychological warfare’

Overlaying all of this is the persistent drumbeat of military threats from Washington, with US President Donald Trump repeatedly threatening fresh military aggression against Iran with the pretext of supporting what he labels “peaceful protestors”.

Talking about the prospects of a military confrontation, Ghaderi said, “requires careful consideration of several very important factors,” starting with geopolitics.

“The key point is that the firm political and legal support of China and Russia for Iran on the international stage has made it certain that the United States and Europe are incapable of forming a consensus against Iran,” he said.

At the same time, he stressed, pressure has produced the opposite of its intended effect inside Iran.

“The destructive and threatening behavior of the United States and Israel toward Iran has not only failed to instill fear within the governing structure of the Islamic Republic,” Ghaderi said, “but has instead led to the full readiness of the armed forces.”

Iranian security forces, the analyst noted, are already operating on a wartime footing—and morale is high. Some, he added, “even eagerly welcome the outbreak of war,” convinced that “should war occur, a heavy defeat would be inflicted on the United States and especially on Israel.”

That confidence, Ghaderi believes, explains why much of the current rhetoric remains performative.

“Beating the drum of a potential future war against Iran is, first, to a significant extent, influenced by psychological operations techniques,” he said.

Beyond that, he pointed to a strategic dilemma. “If we examine the issue through military logic,” Ghaderi remarked, “there is virtually no clear operational strategy on the part of the United States and Israel to prevent Iran’s response.”

“It is precisely for this reason that their maximum effort is focused on building consensus to involve other countries in this matter.”

West’s ‘double standards’ on human rights

On Friday, the UN Human Rights Council adopted an anti-Iranian resolution that was pushed by a number of Western countries. Tehran slammed the resolution as illegitimate and politically motivated.

Ghaderi said the vote fit a broader pattern.

“Western double standards, especially after the events of October 7, 2023, have become apparent to the vast majority of global citizens,” he said, referring to the silence of Western countries in the wake of Israeli genocidal war on Gaza that has killed more than 71,600 Palestinians since October 2023.

He said those contradictions have fueled “a general awakening”  and raised awareness beyond traditional targets of Western criticism.

“This is not only clearly visible in how they confront Iran, the Axis of Resistance, and even countries in Latin America,” Ghaderi remarked, “but today citizens of Western societies themselves have also become aware of this reality.”

At the heart of that realization, he noted, is a growing disillusionment with the institutions meant to govern global conduct. “The important point is that everyone has come to recognize the ineffectiveness of international law and international legal institutions,” he said, adding that many now see the existing order as “nothing but the law of the jungle—based on force and deception.”

“This is precisely the point that has alerted the world to the collapse of the existing order and the formation of a new one with different characteristics, paradigms, and approaches,” Ghaderi said—an argument he notes is increasingly echoed by international relations scholars who “openly regard Iran and the ideology of resistance as the main pillar of the emerging new world order.”

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/01/27/763018/foreign-footprint-turned-iran-economic-protests-fullscale-street-war-analyst