Careless People: Memoir of a Facebook Whistleblower

Careless People: A Cautionary Tale of Power, Greed, and Lost Idealism ...

Careless People: A Cautionary Tale of Power, Greed and Lost Idealism

By Sarah Wynn-Williams

Macmillan (2025)

Book Review

This is the memoir of a former New Zealand diplomat and international lawyer who joined Facebook in 2011 as director of global public policy. In this role, she played a vital role in getting Facebook third world countries as they began to access the Internet. After Facebook began coming coming under attack for allowing bullying, privacy violations, harassment and criminal activity on their platform, the company experienced growing legal problems in many countries.

In 2014, they faced a criminal investigation and armed raids on their Korean office after refusing to submit games on their platform for government review. This was followed by criminal investigations In Brazil, India and France. The Brazilian government imposed millions of dollars in fines for violating bans on electoral advertising.

According to Wynn-Williams one of Facebook’s biggest problems, was that Mark Zuckerberg refused to follow Facebook community guidelines in dealing with friends and business interests.

By January 2016, Facebook was in “deep shit” with governments everywhere for 1) not paying tax in countries that generated major revenue from Facebook users and 2) for allowing Facebook to radicalize terrorists.

The book describes in detail how an “outsider” named Donald Trump used Facebook to win the 2016 election. Using a a large campaign-generated database charting gun registration, credit card history, websites visited and car make and model, the Trump campaign used Facebook algorithms to create a custom audience that raised millions each month through Facebook-generated campaign contributions (Facebook was the Trump campaign’s largest source of campaign contributions).

Wynn-Williams devotes two entire chapters to Facebook’s blatantly illegal activities in China. As if 2017 when she left Facebook, China was Facebooks’s second biggest market (after the US) with $5 billion in annual revenue. Although the government blocks Facebook within China, many Chinese businesses run Facebook ads targeting non-Chinese Facebook users.

Despite her growing concern about Facebook’s unethical and illegal activities, Wynn-Williams had major health problems and was terrified of losing her health insurance. She was ultimately fired in 2017 for filing a sexual harassment complaint against her immediate supervisor.

Following her departure, she submitted a whistleblower complaint to the SEC and helped lobby for California’s anti-sexual harassment Silenced No More Act, which was co-written by a former Facebook coworker. She also advanced anti-sexual harassment shareholder resolutions at Apple, Google, Amazon, Microsoft and Facebook, as well as a Facebook shareholder resolution on the company’s engagement with China.

LED Lights Harm Vision, Cognitive Function — Kids At Special Risk

boy sleeping next to led night light

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) must fulfill its obligation to study the health impacts of LED lights and report its findings to Congress, according to a petition filed Dec. 30, 2025, with the agency.

Federal law directs the secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services or his delegates, such as the FDA, to study health hazards — including the intense artificial light emitted by LEDs — of radiation emitted by electronic products. According to the nonprofit Soft Lights Foundation, which filed the petition, the FDA has ignored that obligation.

In its petition to the FDA, the Soft Lights Foundation cited studies linking the blue light emitted by LEDs to hormonal disruption, increased risk of breast cancer, and other health risks.

Blue light is a high-frequency segment of the visible light spectrum nearly as powerful as ultraviolet (UV) light, according to the Cleveland Clinic. The sun naturally emits some blue light, particularly in the morning, but the proliferation of LED technology means people are now bombarded with blue light at all hours.

Pulsed LED lights interfere with vision and cognitive functioning, and the adverse impacts of LED flashing lights are already the subject of multiple lawsuits,” the petition states.

LEDs, or light-emitting diodes, are semiconductor devices that emit light when electricity flows through them.

The U.S. Department of Energy projects that LEDs, which are more energy-efficient than traditional incandescent light bulbs, will account for the majority of U.S. lighting installations by 2035.

Most electronic screens, including computers, cellphones and electronic advertisements, also contain LEDs. And increasingly, car headlights, bike lights and streetlights use them.

Kids are especially at risk

Mark Baker, founder and president of the Soft Lights Foundation, told The Defender that children are especially vulnerable to the negative effects of blue light exposure.

“The lens of a child’s eye is clear, allowing more hazardous blue wavelength light into the retina,” Baker said. “As we age into adults, the lens becomes thicker and less clear and less blue light reaches the retina.”

Kids with other health conditions may be especially vulnerable to eye damage from blue light.

“Children who have autism, epilepsy, ADHD [attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder], photophobia or many other medical conditions can suffer anxiety, epileptic and nonepileptic seizures, brain fog, nausea and eye pain from exposure to LED light,” Baker said.

LED lights in schools can cause disruptive behavior and can adversely affect learning outcomes, he added.

Studying the health and safety impacts of LEDs and reporting the findings to Congress is the first step the FDA must take to comply with federal law, Baker said.

Next, the agency must work with other federal agencies to establish LED product performance standards that protect people’s health and safety.

“Because the FDA has not published performance standards for LED products to ensure our health and safety, parents have not been given guidelines for how to keep their children safe,” he said.

LED headlights risk drivers’ safety

The intense LEDs in vehicle headlights pose a particular threat to people’s safety, according to the Soft Lights Foundation petition.

The petition includes dozens of comments from people who said the blinding brightness of LED headlights makes it difficult to drive safely.

A healthy 28-year-old with 20/20 vision wrote:

“There have been many times where I pass a car coming from the opposite direction, and I legitimately can’t see the road anymore. …

“There’s also, of course, the issue of cars behind you with bright headlights. Even if I set my rearview mirror to its ‘tinted’ mode, the light coming off of my side mirrors is still so bright. It makes it almost impossible to see out of my mirrors, such that I can’t see what’s behind me or next to me, and it even affects my ability to see right in front of me.”

The FDA should work with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, part of the U.S. Department of Transportation, to set limits on maximum intensity of LED headlights, Baker said.

In May 2024, the FDA rejected four earlier petitions from the Soft Lights Foundation urging the agency to regulate LEDs, arguing that Congress does not require the agency to do so.

An FDA spokesperson told The Defender that the agency is reviewing the petition and will respond directly to the Soft Lights Foundation and Baker.

Under federal law, the FDA has 180 days to respond.

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/led-blue-light-emr-vision-cognitive-function-kids-risk-petition-fda/

Senate rejects Trump’s military threats against Venezuela with war powers vote

The Associated Press, LIVE 5 WCSC, Thu, 08 Jan 2026 

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate advanced a resolution Thursday that would limit President Donald Trump’s ability to conduct further attacks against Venezuela, sounding a note of disapproval for his expanding ambitions in the Western Hemisphere.

Democrats and five Republicans voted to advance the war powers resolution on a 52-47 vote and ensure a vote next week on final passage. It has virtually no chance of becoming law because Trump would have to sign it if it were to pass the Republican-controlled House. Still, it was a significant gesture that showed unease among some Republicans after the U.S. military seized Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro in a surprise nighttime raid over the weekend.

Trump’s administration is now seeking to control Venezuela’s oil resources and its government, but the war powers resolution would require congressional approval for any further attacks on the South American country.

“To me, this is all about going forward,” said Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley, one of the five Republican votes. “If the president should determine, ‘You know what? I need to put troops on the ground of Venezuela.’ I think that would require Congress to weigh in.”

The other Republicans who backed the resolution were Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine and Todd Young of Indiana.

Trump reacted to their votes by saying on social media that they “should never be elected to office again” and that the vote “greatly hampers American Self Defense and National Security.”

Democrats had failed to pass several such resolutions in the months that Trump escalated his campaign against Venezuela. But lawmakers argued now that Trump has captured Maduro and set his sights to other conquests such as Greenland, the vote presents Congress with an opportunity.

“This wasn’t just a procedural vote. It’s a clear rejection of the idea that one person can unilaterally send American sons and daughters into harm’s way without Congress, without debate,” said Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York.

Lawmakers’ response to the Venezuela operation

Republican leaders have said they had no advance notification of the raid early morning Saturday to seize Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, but mostly expressed satisfaction this week as top administration officials provided classified briefings on the operation.

Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., who forced the vote on the resolution, said he believes many Republicans were caught off guard by the outcome. He said that Trump’s recent comments to The New York Times suggesting U.S. oversight in Venezuela could last for years — combined with details revealed in the classified briefings — prompted some lawmakers to conclude that “this is too big to let a president do it without Congress.”

The administration has used an evolving set of legal justifications for the monthslong campaign in Central and South America, from destroying alleged drug boats under authorizations for the global fight against terrorism to seizing Maduro in what was ostensibly a law enforcement operation to put him on trial in the United States.

Republican leaders have backed Trump.

[…]

The rarely enforced War Powers Act

Trump criticized the Senate vote as “impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief” under the Constitution.

Presidents of both parties have long argued the War Powers Act infringes on their authority. Passed in 1973 in the aftermath of the Vietnam War — and over the veto of Republican President Richard Nixon — it has never succeeded in directly forcing a president to halt military action.

Congress declares war while the president serves as commander in chief, according to the Constitution. But lawmakers have not formally declared war since World War II, granting presidents broad latitude to act unilaterally. The law requires presidents to notify Congress within 48 hours of deploying forces and to end military action within 60 to 90 days absent authorization — limits that presidents of both parties have routinely stretched.

[…]

https://www.live5news.com/2026/01/08/senate-advances-resolution-limit-trumps-war-powers-after-venezuela-raid/

Israel’s ‘Ceasefire’ In Gaza Turns Out To Be A Ruse.

The Dissident

Israeli officials are now admitting that the so-called ceasefire in Gaza was a ruse, and they plan to resume the full-scale genocide and ethnic cleansing of Gaza in March.

According to a report in the Times of Israel, “The Israel Defense Forces has drawn up plans to launch renewed intensive military operations in Gaza in March, with an offensive targeting Gaza City aimed at expanding the part of the Strip controlled by Israel”.

The Times of Israel boasted that the ceasefire was a ruse to make it easier to bombard all of Gaza without killing Israeli prisoners of war, quoting the research fellow at the Israel Center for Grand Strategy, Erez Winner saying, “an offensive against Hamas would now be easier for Israel because it no longer has to worry about putting hostages at risk, now that all the living hostages and all but one hostage’s body have been returned.”

This confirmed what many had already speculated, that Israel was never serious about committing to the ceasefire agreed to in October and always planned to resume the genocide in Gaza.

As the former deputy commander of the IDF’s Gaza Division, Amir Avivi admitted to Israel’s Channel 14, Israel only agreed to the ceasefire because, “After two years of fighting, the tools are worn out. We want to refresh the forces, to establish the defense line”.

Furthermore, Israel never actually adhered to the ceasefire or ended the genocide, only slowed it down, with Gaza’s health ministry documenting that, “442 people have been killed and 1,236 injured since October 11 – the date the Gaza truce entered into force.”

Furthermore, Israel never ended the blockade in Gaza, and has planned to ramp it up by the time it resumes the full-scale genocide in March, by blocking 37 aid groups operating in Gaza, including Doctors Without Borders, effective March 1st.

The Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem documented in December that, “only 57% of the 556 aid missions planned by the UN and its partners were carried out, including the delivery of vital aid and equipment, medical evacuations, and infrastructure repairs” adding, “Israel’s genocidal campaign in Gaza did not end with the ‘ceasefire’ declaration. Blocking humanitarian aid, alongside ongoing airstrikes and shootings, is a direct continuation of the assault on Gaza’s population.”

Now Israel plans to resume the genocide and genocidal starvation siege in Gaza in March.

Along with the fact that the Israeli prisoners of war being released will make it easier for Israel to indiscriminately bomb Gaza and the fact that it gives them the chance to “refresh the forces”, there are other calculations from Israel which will make their genocidal ethnic cleansing plan easier by March.

Gila Gamliel, Israel’s Science and Technology Minister, who was previously Israel’s Intelligence Minister admitted that Israel’s ultimate plan is to, “make the Gaza Strip uninhabitable until the population leaves”.

Now Israel has a dumping ground for ethnically cleansed Palestinians after making Gaza “uninhabitable”- Somaliland.

In late December, Israel became the first UN nation to recognize Somaliland, a breakaway separatist region of Somalia, as a state.

This was done in part because- as Israeli journalist Amit Segal boasted – because “Somaliland was supposed to — and may still — absorb Gazans”.

The Israeli paper Ynet noted at the time, “The territory has recently been mentioned as a possible destination for Gazans, with officials there saying they would be willing to absorb ‘one million Gazans’”adding that, “Israeli intelligence officials say the Mossad has been active in Somaliland for years, laying the groundwork for the recognition through long-standing, discreet relationships with senior figures there.”

Dan Diker, the president of the Likud connected Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs admitted, “our friends in Somaliland made a very generous offer privately … of their willingness to absorb or to create communities for hundreds of thousands even beyond a million up to a million and half Gazans” adding, “Somaliland, in our understanding, is really the only country, now country , that stepped up to the plate to absorb Gazans”.

According to Somalia’s Defence Minister Ahmed Moalim Fiqi, “Somalia has confirmed information that Israel has a plan to transfer Palestinians and to send them to Somaliland.”

Furthermore, Israel is undoubtedly hoping that by March, it, along with the U.S., will have carried out regime change in Iran, further isolating the Palestinians and cutting off a key ally of resistance groups Hamas, Hezbollah, and Ansar Allah, which would be a bulwark to Israel’s resumption of genocide and ethnic cleansing in Gaza.

Israel, through social media campaigns and apparent Mossad agents on the ground, has been encouraging the current riots unfolding in Iran, hoping they will lead to regime change.

Along with this, they are pushing Trump to support another regime change bombing in Iran in response to a government crackdown on the riots, with Trump repeatedly threatening to “hit them (Iran) very hard” and, saying, “If Iran shots and violently kills peaceful protesters, which is their custom, the United States of America will come to their rescue. We are locked and loaded and ready to go.”

Through regime change in Iran, Israel hopes to take out one of the last allies of Palestinian resistance, paving the way for its ethnic cleansing plan.

[…]

Via https://the307.substack.com/p/israels-ceasefire-in-gaza-turns-out

Did US Achieve Regime Change in Venezuela?

Raphael Machado January 12, 2026

We are facing a classic U.S. modus operandi: lots of pyrotechnics, little substance, zero prognostication.

Shortly after the kidnapping of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, the event was quickly disseminated as a typical “regime change” operation against its new target and enemy, Venezuela. Critics and supporters of Bolivarianism flooded social media with posts announcing the “end” of Chavismo.

Three days after the event – and with many things insufficiently explained, such as the minimal Venezuelan military reaction during the attack – the Venezuelan landscape remains complex.

First, let’s look at the factual reality: Chavismo still governs in Caracas. The country’s Vice President, Delcy Rodríguez, was sworn in as interim president in a ceremony that featured the prominent participation of the ambassadors from Russia, China, and Iran. She does so, by all appearances, with the consensus of her brother Jorge Rodríguez, who leads the National Assembly, Defense Minister Padrino López, and Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello. Maduro’s son, also named Nicolás, has also declared support for the institutional arrangement that sees Delcy Rodríguez performing the role of national leader while his father is prosecuted in the U.S.

Was there an expectation that things would unfold differently?

Frankly, all statements from Donald Trump and Marco Rubio following Maduro’s kidnapping suggest that even if we consider the kidnapping itself a successful military operation, politically the event appears to have been ill-conceived. The U.S. government has already rejected the notion of handing power to the opposition and has even dismissed the prospect of new elections.

It is noteworthy that immediately after the kidnapping, Western media announced that Delcy Rodríguez had fled the country, which was obviously a lie. More recently, some channels and profiles have announced an alleged coup attempt in Caracas by Diosdado Cabello.

These deliberately spread rumors point to the continuation of the hybrid war against Venezuela, through the modality of psychological warfare, but they may also reveal expectations and, perhaps, even “false” information received by the U.S. about the situation in Venezuela.

Perhaps, indeed, the U.S. expectation was that the removal of Maduro could trigger a power struggle among the most important figures of Chavismo, and that the natural outcome of such a conflict would be a regime change. But none of this is happening, and for now, a broad consensus seems to hover over the Venezuelan political landscape.

It is also plausible that the U.S. was surprised by the lack of positive demonstrations by Venezuelans for Maduro’s removal. In Venezuela, one only sees protests criticizing the U.S. imperialist action. Even the opposition has joined pro-government forces in demanding the return of Nicolás Maduro.

This represents a significant problem.

Over the past few years, the U.S. has insisted on the narrative that Edmundo González would have triumphed over Nicolás Maduro in the 2024 presidential elections, with over 70% of the valid votes, which would be equivalent to saying González had the support of over 20 million citizens. Where are these people? Why were there no celebrations in Venezuela for Maduro’s kidnapping? It’s no use resorting to the “repression” thesis. “Repression” does not prevent opponents from trying to hold their protests, even in China.

It is likely that the timidity even of those who voted for González (a minority of the population) is simply due to the fact that Venezuelan economic indicators have indeed been improving in recent years: inflation dropped from 1,700,000% to 85%, the HDI has resumed growth, rising from 0.660 to 0.705, the unemployment rate fell from 33% to 6%, GDP growth of 6.5% (9% in the third quarter alone), and so on. Venezuela is, in fact, on a tide of recovery that has been ongoing for 4 uninterrupted years.

It may be the typical caution of those who, after many years, are finally seeing their lives improve and prefer to guard against very abrupt changes in the country’s leadership course.

There is also no evidence that the new interim Venezuelan government has agreed to any geopolitical realignment. Beyond the oil issue, we know that the determining element in the Venezuelan question is the guarantee of the automatic alignment of the entire continent with the U.S., and Venezuela, on the contrary, chose a path of rapprochement with Russia, China, and Iran.

In this sense, news indicating that Venezuela would resume supplying oil to the U.S. does not mean much. Venezuela has always wanted to sell oil to the U.S. and has indeed been selling oil to the U.S., both under the Chávez and Maduro governments, after a period of interruption due to sanctions.

The real question is whether the U.S. will manage to convince Venezuela to stop selling oil to its allies, as well as to break military ties and diplomatic alignments. Only then could one speak of a U.S. victory.

For now, however, we are facing a classic U.S. modus operandi: lots of pyrotechnics, little substance, zero prognostication.

[…]

Via https://strategic-culture.su/news/2026/01/12/did-the-u-s-achieve-a-regime-change-in-venezuela/

Witness Claims US Military Used Microwave Weapons in Venezuela Strike

Maduro couple in prison uniforms heading to U.S. court - Nicolas Maduro, Venezuelan president, and his wife Cilia Flores arrive at the Manhattan heliport in New York by helicopter on the morning of the 5th, then move while being detained by police and Drug Enforcement Administration agents. The two, currently detained at the New York Metropolitan Detention Center, appear in the Manhattan Federal Court for the first time today. /Reuters-Yonhap

Maduro couple in prison uniforms heading to U.S. court – Nicolas Maduro, Venezuelan president, and his wife Cilia Flores arrive at the Manhattan heliport in New York by helicopter on the morning of the 5th, then move while being detained by police and Drug Enforcement Administration agents. The two, currently detained at the New York Metropolitan Detention Center, appear in the Manhattan Federal Court for the first time today. /Reuters-Yonhap

Claims have emerged that the United States conducted an airstrike on Venezuela on the 3rd, using advanced weaponry to neutralize President Nicolás Maduro’s security detail during his capture. Speculation has arisen over whether the U.S. military employed sound wave or microwave attacks, though some doubt the credibility of these claims.

According to the New York Post on the 10th, a Trump supporter on X (formerly Twitter) recently posted a lengthy interview purportedly with a Venezuelan security guard. The anonymous guard stated that during the airstrike, U.S. forces annihilated soldiers using technology never before seen or heard of.

He recalled, “We were on guard, but suddenly all our radar systems shut down without any explanation. The next thing we saw were drones, a lot of drones, flying over our positions. We didn’t know how to react.” He added, “After those drones appeared, some helicopters arrived, but there were very few. I think barely eight helicopters. From those helicopters, soldiers came down, but a very small number. Maybe twenty men. But those men were technologically very advanced. They didn’t look like anything we’ve fought against before.”

The guard described the incident as a massacre rather than a battle. “We were hundreds, but we had no chance. They were shooting with such precision and speed… it seemed like each soldier was firing 300 rounds per minute. We couldn’t do anything,” he said. “At one point, they launched something—I don’t know how to describe it… it was like a very intense sound wave. Suddenly I felt like my head was exploding from the inside.”

He continued, “We all started bleeding from the nose. Some were vomiting blood. We fell to the ground, unable to move. ”

The post garnered 26.2 million views, though the account did not specify which media outlet conducted the interview or provide concrete sources.

White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt shared the post, urging, “Stop what you are doing and read this,” but declined to comment on its authenticity, according to the New York Post.

Citing a former U.S. intelligence source, the New York Post reported, “The military has had directed energy weapons — which neutralize targets using focused energy such as microwaves or laser beams — for years, but this could be the first time it’s been used in combat by the U.S.,” adding that such weapons can cause bleeding, loss of mobility, pain, and burns.

Microwave weapons disrupt electronic systems or attack the brain’s temporal lobe without passing through the ears. Unlike ultrasound, they penetrate metal and concrete, enabling covert attacks. A common civilian application is microwave ovens.

In 2020, during a border dispute with India, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army reportedly used microwave weapons. Professor Jin Canrong, deputy head of the International Relations College at Renmin University, stated, “When microwaves were fired from the mountain base, the summit became like a microwave oven. Indian troops on the high ground vomited and collapsed within 15 minutes, forcing a retreat.”

However, some netizens questioned the credibility of the Venezuelan guard’s account due to the lack of verifiable sources.

Earlier, the U.S. captured Maduro and his spouse at a safe house in Caracas on the 3rd under Operation “Absolute Resolve.” The arrest and transport were carried out by the U.S. Army’s elite Delta Force, with over 150 military aircraft, including stealth fighters like the F-22 Raptor, deployed to neutralize Venezuela’s air defenses.

Venezuela reported 100 total deaths from the U.S. operation but did not specify civilian casualties. Venezuelan military authorities confirmed 24 soldier deaths, while Cuba stated 32 of its security personnel died in Venezuela. The U.S. reported no military fatalities.

[…]

Via https://www.chosun.com/english/world-en/2026/01/12/BF5S2DSX65CHPGMEXQTLCK5GZM/

Trump Orders Plan to Invade Greenland

Trump orders plan to invade Greenland – media

RT

Should the US president go ahead with an operation, it could lead to “the destruction of NATO from the inside,” the Daily Mail has reported

US President Donald Trump has ordered his senior commanders to draw up a plan for a potential invasion of Greenland – a move that could potentially lead to a complete collapse of NATO, the Daily Mail reported on Saturday, citing sources.

The US president has long sought to take control of Greenland, an autonomous territory under Danish sovereignty, citing security concerns and the need to deter Russia and China, while not ruling out a military option to capture the island. This stance has put him at loggerheads with the European members of NATO, which have rallied behind Denmark.

According to the Daily Mail, Trump asked the Joint Special Operations Command to prepare invasion plans, but the Joint Chiefs of Staff are pushing back, arguing that the move would be illegal and lack congressional support. One source told the paper that senior generals “have tried to distract Trump by talking about less controversial measures,” such as a “strike on Iran.”

The report said that the push to seize Greenland was led by several Trump advisers, including political aide Stephen Miller, who were emboldened by the recent US attack on Venezuela and now want to move quickly to secure the island before Russia or China could make a move.

One diplomatic source warned that the invasion could lead to “the destruction of NATO from the inside.” He added that some “European officials suspect this is the real aim of the hardline MAGA faction around Trump… Occupying Greenland could force the Europeans to abandon NATO. If Trump wants to end NATO, this might be the most convenient way to do it.”

British diplomats cited by the Daily Mail have suggested that Trump views the Greenland operation as a way to distract American voters from the state of the US economy ahead of the mid-term elections. In this vein, one of the outlet’s sources suggested that Trump could pursue an escalatory approach in the short term before shifting toward a compromise.

Separately, the Daily Telegraph reported that European NATO members are discussing possible deployments to Greenland, including troops, ships, and aircraft, to guard the Arctic and assuage Trump’s concerns.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/630802-trump-plan-invade-greenland/

Behind the riots: Israel-Pahlavi nexus and the delusion of ‘regime change’ in Iran


By Press TV Staff Writer

After the Israeli regime launched its no-holds-barred genocidal war against Palestinians in Gaza in October 2023, it found support from familiar quarters: Iranian monarchists based in Western countries, led by the son of the deposed Shah.

In statements to Western and Israeli media following the events of October 7, the self-proclaimed “crown prince,” Reza Pahlavi, openly endorsed the assault on Gaza, while vilifying the Gaza-based resistance movement Hamas and the Islamic Republic of Iran.

In November 2024, his wife, Yasmine Pahlavi, was photographed at a pro-Israel rally in Washington, waving the long-discredited Pahlavi and Israeli flags, images that were quickly circulated across social media by Pahlavi-linked bot networks.

As the death toll from the genocidal war mounted, the son of the former Iranian monarch and his loyalists aggressively lobbied on behalf of the child-murdering regime, repeatedly justifying its war crimes that earned the Israeli murderers arrest warrants from the International Criminal Court (ICC).

Pahlavi has been unapologetic about his close ties with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other senior Israeli officials, as well as lobby groups, even traveling to the occupied territories to publicly endorse the regime’s occupation, genocide, and settler-colonial policies.

The alliance between Iran’s former monarchists and the Israeli regime – actors united by shared interests – gained further momentum after Pahlavi and his spouse visited the Israeli-occupied territories in April 2024 at the invitation of Netanyahu himself.

The visit marked the formalization of what had long been an informal and deeply troubling relationship.

This relationship was further solidified after the Tel Aviv regime launched an unprovoked and unjustified war of aggression against Iran in June this year, resulting in the martyrdom of more than 1,000 people, including women and children.

While the Iranian nation mourned its dead, Pahlavi monarchists openly celebrated. Reza Pahlavi offered no words of sympathy for the victims of the 12-day war, laying bare where his loyalties truly lie.

Recently, he resurfaced once again as merchants in Iran organized peaceful demonstrations in Tehran to protest sharp fluctuations in the national currency, the rial.

Seizing the moment, Pahlavi sought to exploit the situation by calling on Mossad- and CIA-linked sleeper cells inside Iran to incite riots and hijack what had begun as peaceful protests.

Not long before, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported that Israel was running a covert influence operation using fake accounts and AI-generated content to promote Pahlavi and advocate for the restoration of monarchy in the Islamic Republic, underscoring the depth of this alliance.

Iran riots 2026 – The same old playbook

What unfolded on Thursday and Friday amounted to “terrorism,” as Iranian officials succinctly described it, when armed rioters rampaged through Tehran and other cities, setting fire to public property, including bus stations, banks, hospitals, and mosques.

The violence followed calls by Pahlavi, speaking from his home in Maryland, urging rioters inside Iran to carry out acts of terror, in line with a script coordinated with Israeli and American intelligence agencies.

Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, in remarks delivered on Friday, stressed that the country would “not back down against vandals,” rejecting acts of destruction carried out to appease foreign powers.

At the same time, he underscored that peaceful protests over economic grievances remain legitimate.

“The Islamic Republic will not back down against vandals. It will not tolerate mercenaries of foreigners,” he said, emphasizing that anyone who serves foreign powers is “rejected” by the Iranian nation.

Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf echoed these remarks on Sunday, affirming that Iran recognizes the people’s right to peaceful protest over economic concerns, but will stand firmly against armed terrorism.

“Those who openly identify themselves as foreign mercenaries, betraying their own homeland to please the US president [Donald Trump], transforming themselves into Daesh operatives, and inciting a terrorist war, should know that we will confront them with the most severe measures,” Qalibaf warned.

Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi also cautioned the United States and the Israeli regime over their support for the rioters in a post on X on Saturday.

“President Trump’s own former CIA director has openly and unashamedly highlighted what Mossad and its American enablers are really up to,” he wrote, referring to former CIA chief Mike Pompeo.

The intelligence wing of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) also said in a statement on Friday that all foreign-backed plots aimed at destabilizing the country would be decisively confronted.

Ali Larijani, Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council (SNSC), likewise said that security forces and the judiciary were prepared to respond “in the strongest manner” to foreign-linked individuals involved in armed violence and organized attacks targeting the Iranian nation.

Pahlavi, according to observers, serves as a pawn in this sinister game played by the US and the Israeli regime to realize what they have sought for more than four decades.

The pitiful life of the younger Pahlavi

The life story of the younger Pahlavi reads as a peculiar chronicle marked by repeated setbacks across nearly every domain – political, academic, familial, professional, financial, and commercial – failures that observers link to grandiose aspirations that were never realistic.

He was born the eldest son of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the former Iranian autocrat installed and sustained by American and British backing, and was groomed from childhood as the designated successor to the throne.

That trajectory, however, collapsed when Iranians rose against the Western-backed monarchy more than four decades ago, overthrowing the regime and establishing the Islamic Republic.

As the popular revolution unfolded, he fled Iran with his family and eventually settled in the US. There, he enrolled at two separate colleges but failed to complete his studies at either institution.

Even earlier, before the Revolution, he attempted to undergo pilot training in the US military system, enrolling in a one-year program but dropping out just months before completion.

Years later, he claimed in his own memoirs that he had volunteered to serve in the Iranian Air Force during Iraq’s Ba’athist invasion of Iran, only to be turned away – a narrative widely dismissed as a fabrication designed to craft a heroic personal myth.

Following his father’s death, the then 20-year-old declared himself the new “king” of Iran, a self-coronation that received no recognition whatsoever, not even from the US government, which deliberately distanced itself from him.

Decades later, revelations by Israeli intelligence figures exposed that during the 1980s Sacred Defense period, Pahlavi had in fact been plotting a coup aimed at reinstalling himself as monarch.

The plan reportedly began with outreach to Yaakov Nimrodi, the Israeli intelligence operative involved in training Iran’s notorious SAVAK, and included the approval of nearly $800 million in military hardware by then Israeli defense minister Ariel Sharon.

The scheme collapsed entirely, after which Pahlavi retreated from public view, relocating to a lavish estate in Virginia. There, he married, lived extravagantly, and spent generously from funds reportedly supplied by American and Israeli backers.

His financial mismanagement eventually caught up with him. Former associates from the old regime filed lawsuits against him, and he was seen in courtrooms pleading his case, claiming he had exhausted his funds.

By his own acknowledgment, the 63-year-old son of Iran’s last monarch has never held steady employment, surviving instead on wealth his father stole from the Iranian people and donations from pro-monarchy supporters based in Western countries.

The loss of royal privilege proved devastating for his family. Two of his siblings reportedly struggled with severe depression and substance abuse, ultimately taking their own lives.

Even on a personal level, many of his aspirations went unrealized. One of his long-held desires – to father a son who could serve as a symbolic heir – never materialized.

The unattainable goal

For many years, Pahlavi portrayed himself as politically neutral, insisting he had no interest in restoring the monarchy, a concession to the reality that such a project was implausible.

Yet encouragement from American and Zionist allies steadily pushed him back into the political spotlight.

Whenever unrest surfaced in Iran, he was quick to insert himself, calling for the removal of the Islamic Republic’s democratically elected leadership and presenting himself as a supposed alternative figurehead.

During the 2010s, Western governments, particularly the US, UK, and Israel, expanded support for a wide spectrum of anti-Iran factions, from Marxist groups and ethnic separatists to monarchists, including Pahlavi.

Like other Western-backed entities branded as “the opposition,” he claimed leadership of a broad, inclusive “national council,” which in practice amounted to little more than a personal platform surrounded by a small circle of loyalists.

Persian-language satellite networks enthusiastically promoted him as an opposition leader, most notably the UK-based monarchist channel Manoto, which ceased operations earlier this year.

These outlets focused heavily on romanticizing royal rule as a lost utopia, glamorizing the lifestyle of the former ruling elite, and targeting younger audiences. Additional content included historical revisionism, conspiracy theories about the revolution, dismissal of Iran’s achievements, and disproportionate emphasis on isolated social issues.

Pahlavi regularly appeared on these platforms, echoing the geopolitical narratives of Washington, London, and Tel Aviv, while consistently denying the legitimacy of the Islamic Republic.

With Trump’s arrival in the White House last time, Pahlavi identified what he believed to be a renewed opening. He aligned himself with an administration dominated by neoconservatives and hardline Zionists, endorsing US withdrawal from the 2015 nuclear agreement and parroting Trump’s rhetoric on Iran’s nuclear program.

He became a vocal advocate of the “maximum pressure” campaign, absurdly claiming that crippling sanctions reflected the wishes of the Iranian people, an assertion that revealed his profound detachment from their lived reality.

At the time, his actions suggested confidence that Trump’s strategy would dismantle Iran’s political system, and he worked to present himself as a ready-made figure for a US-engineered “new Iran.”

He was frequently seen alongside Sheldon Adelson, the late Republican billionaire and militant Zionist who once openly suggested using a nuclear weapon against Iran. He also attended multiple events at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP), an AIPAC-affiliated think tank known for its aggressive pro-Israel agenda.

When Trump’s policies ultimately failed, Pahlavi’s hopes dimmed, prompting him to seek more direct backing, financial and symbolic, from the Zionist regime itself.

Pahlavi-Israel alignment

In April 2023, Pahlavi and his wife undertook a five-day visit to the Israeli-occupied territories, where they were warmly welcomed by Netanyahu and intelligence minister Gila Gamliel.

In Tel Aviv, Pahlavi echoed Netanyahu’s rhetoric almost verbatim, jointly fantasizing about the collapse of the Islamic Republic and the return of monarchical rule.

Accompanied by Gamliel, the couple toured various sites, attended a ceremony at Yad Vashem, and performed a Jewish prayer at the Western Wall, carefully avoiding any visit to Al-Aqsa Mosque or acknowledgment of Palestinian occupation.

His wife later shared photographs with Israeli female soldiers in occupied East Jerusalem al-Quds, featuring a slogan previously deployed during Western- and Israeli-backed riots in Iran.

Pahlavi was joined on the trip by Amir-Hossein Etemadi, Saeed Ghasseminejad, and Mark Dubowitz of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), a US-based Zionist lobbying organization.

All three are known for virulently anti-Iranian and anti-Palestinian positions, their advocacy of harsh sanctions, and open support for US-Israeli military confrontation with Iran.

He also met with Hananya Naftali, a Likud-linked social media propagandist and Netanyahu associate who has maintained Persian-language accounts on X and Facebook since 2020, despite not speaking the language.

Israeli media and Pahlavi himself labeled the visit “historic,” though in reality it amounted to little more than a mutual publicity exercise, reflecting long-established ties rather than any genuine breakthrough.

The relationship between the Pahlavi dynasty and Zionist interests dates back to the 1960s, when SAVAK was created with Israeli assistance and secret oil arrangements were finalized beyond public scrutiny.

Pahlavi’s own connections to Israeli intelligence trace back to the 1980s, when he sought their help in orchestrating a monarchist coup, ties that have only deepened over time.

[…]

Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/01/11/762193/behind-riots-israel-pahlavi-nexus-delusion-regime-change-iran


The US and Israel Want Zionist Reza Pahlavi, the Son of the Last Shah of Iran, to Take Over Iran – Is War Imminent?

Brian Shilhavy

The U.S. and Israel Want Zionist Reza Pahlavi, the Son of the Last Shah of Iran, to Take Over Iran – Is War Imminent?

Having failed to subdue Iran last year, the U.S. and Israel (CIA – Mossad) are now arming protesters in Iran to protest against the government.

They want Reza Pahlavi, the son of the last Shah of Iran, to take over, as his loyalties are to Israel.

Iran has already said that if Trump bombs them, they will return the favor, inside the U.S. (and probably with the help of China and Russia).

This military analysis from The Cradle (Air Supremacy or War: Iran and the US in West Asia’s Final Countdown) is chilling, to say the least.

[…]

Via https://t.me/healthimpact/2945

The Trump Show, Venezuela Episode

Dmitry Orlov

[…]

According to the “legend” (a technical term), Delta Force heroically extracted the dictator and his wife from their bedroom at Palacio de Miraflores in Caracas in a hale of bullets and transported them to a jail in Brooklyn to be put on a kangaroo trial on trumped up drugs and weapons charges.

The trial will be presided over by the 92-year-old Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein . . . even the simplest of facts should force him to dismiss this case with prejudice. One of these facts is that Maduro and his wife are (according to the “legend”) victims of a cross-border abduction, not a lawful arrest, and are being wrongfully detained. Another such fact is that, being foreign nationals, they are not subject to US laws and could not have been charged or arrested by US officials while not on US territory. Yet another is that Maduro has sovereign immunity from prosecution as the head of a sovereign state.

The reason for the Venezuelan fracas is Trump’s great new plan, which he formulated while laying in bed making his feet dance. It is to resurrect something called the Monroe Doctrine. Trump is wise enough to have realized that the US is no longer a match against the combined power of other great nations (Russia, China, India) but might possibly still stand a chance at international dominance if it limited itself to just the Western Hemisphere.

The original Monroe Doctrine, declared by US president James Monroe in 1823, warned European powers against further colonization or interference in the Americas.

[…]

Imagining how the Monroe doctrine would apply in 2026 is definitely the stuff of comedy. The US is no longer dominant in much of anything other than debt. It produces a lot of oil, but it consumes even more oil than it produces and is forced to import heavier grades of oil in order to make jet fuel and diesel. It is still a major liquefied gas exporter but most of its gas production is from fracking and that resource has reached a plateau and is expected to start trending down. There is also a fanciful dream of the US becoming an “artificial intelligence superpower” but AI is just a financial bubble — a virtual repeat of the dot-com bubble of 2000. AI does not pay for itself and produces garbage. Consequently, Merriam-Webster’s Word of the Year for 2025 was “slop” — low-quality digital content produced by AI.

None of this bodes well for the renewed ability of the US to dominate the Western Hemisphere. But then Trump heard that Venezuela has “the world’s largest oil reserves.” Now, if the US could grab that oil from the Venezuelans

Unfortunately, Venezuelan oil is not oil at all; it is tar. It has to be forced out of the ground together with sand or steamed out of the ground. It then has to be thinned with lighter hydrocarbons such as naphtha in order to form a liquid that can be transported by oil tankers. The oil is high in sulfur, which corrodes pipes and other equipment and causes environmental problems. Venezuela’s oil industry is old and decrepit. It can currently produce around 1 million barrels of heavy crude a day. It has been estimated that increasing this amount to 3 million barrels a day would require an investment of $10 billion a year for close to a decade… at which point the Venezuelans may very well renationalize their oil industry just like they did under Hugo Chavez, once again leaving the investors with nothing.

Well, never mind all these boring technical details! What Trump seems to have latched onto is the estimated 300 billion barrels of oil claimed to be Venezuela’s total oil reserves. They are not reserves but resources — and may never be produced — but that’s another one of these technical distinctions Trump doesn’t care about. The point is, if the US were able to list “300 billion barrels of oil” as collateral on a loan application, then it just might be able to borrow a few more trillions of dollars, to add to the already staggering pile of debt and to push off national bankruptcy past the midterm elections.

The problem is, in spite of the mock abduction, Venezuela is not Trump’s. Trump may think that Venezuela is in his very own hemisphere, but economically it is China’s and militarily it is Russia’s. These two countries are not going to simply let him have it. The US Navy has been able to blockade Venezuela, but it is unclear how well that’s going to work now that oil tankers are switching to flying the Russian flag and hosting private military companies while the Chinese are equipping their cargo ships with rocket launchers.

[…]

Via https://boosty.to/cluborlov/posts/7d98ff9b-f461-48c7-94dd-536e391eab13