The Most Revolutionary Act

Uncensored updates on world events, economics, the environment and medicine

The Most Revolutionary Act

Author Archives: stuartbramhall

Unknown's avatar

About stuartbramhall

Retired child and adolescent psychiatrist and American expatriate in New Zealand. In 2002, I made the difficult decision to close my 25-year Seattle practice after 15 years of covert FBI harassment. I describe the unrelenting phone harassment, illegal break-ins and six attempts on my life in my 2010 book The Most Revolutionary Act: Memoir of an American Refugee.

Republican Sen Eric Schmitt Vows to ‘End COVID Tyranny’ of CDC and NIH

Posted on by
6

Republican U.S. Senate candidate and Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt listens to a speaker during the Governor's Ham Breakfast at the Missouri State Fair in Sedalia, Mo. Thursday, Aug. 18, 2022.

Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.) introduced a bill Thursday to roll back the federal overreach of public health authorities amid the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a copy obtained by The Post. AP

Josh Christenson

New York Post

Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.) introduced a bill Thursday that would give Congress greater oversight of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) following the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a copy of the measure exclusively obtained by The Post

The bill, known as the “End COVID Tyranny Act,” would mandate congressional appointment and term limits for the directors of both agencies, as well as require a majority vote by both chambers to approve a public health emergency lasting longer than 90 days.

An advisory committee for the CDC director would also be appointed by Congress and with the approval of the US comptroller general.

The measure would further mandate foreign research labs that receive US government funding to pass quarterly inspections on animal welfare and cleanliness standards.

View this document on Scribd

The legislation comes six months after President Biden ended the COVID public health emergency and national emergency declaration begun under his predecessor, Donald Trump, in March 2020.

Many controversial COVID-era policies bypassed legislative approval, with federal and state authorities unilaterally imposing lockdowns, mask mandates and vaccine passports — only to face criticism and reverse course later.

While Trump instituted the first lockdowns via executive order, he resisted a national mask mandate and left office before having to consider federal COVID vaccination requirements.

Biden issued a federal employee mask mandate on his first day in office and required non-citizens to present proof of vaccination when entering the US.

The latter measure was rolled back in May, along with all vaccine requirements for federal workers, which had been blocked by an appeals court two months prior.

The Biden administration also saw an attempt to force vaccinations or COVID tests on private employers overturned by the Supreme Court.

“Mandates, vaccine passports, forced lockdowns, and further overreach imposed by Joe Biden and his army of federal bureaucrats during the COVID pandemic set an extremely dangerous precedent that still persists to this day,” Schmitt said in a statement.

“Missourians do not need faceless officials buried in a cubicle in Washington telling them how to live their lives – as Senator, I intend to protect Missourians from further rule-by-decree from unelected bureaucrats,” he added.

“The End COVID Tyranny Act limits the power of executive branch actors and returns the critical role of oversight to the Article I branch, the people’s branch.”

[…]

Via https://nypost.com/2023/11/30/news/sen-eric-schmitt-vows-to-end-covid-tyranny-of-cdc-nih/

Toxic ‘Forever Chemicals’ Found in Thousands of Private Wells Near U.S. Military Bases

Posted on by
1
military water pfas forever chemicals feature

By Patricia Kime

KFF Health News

Water tests show nearly 3,000 private wells located near 63 active and former U.S. military bases are contaminated with “forever chemicals” at levels higher than what federal regulators consider safe for drinking.

According to the Environmental Working Group (EWG), a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit that analyzed the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) testing data, 2,805 wells spread across 29 states were contaminated with at least one of two types of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, above 4 parts per trillion, a limit proposed earlier this year by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

That new drinking water standard is expected to take effect by the end of the year.

But contamination in those wells was lower than the 70 parts per trillion threshold the Pentagon uses to trigger remediation.

EWG researchers said they did not know how many people rely on the wells for drinking, cooking and bathing, but the 76 tested locations represent just a fraction of the private wells near 714 current or former military sites spread across the U.S.

According to EWG, Texas had nearly a third of the contaminated wells, with 909.

Researchers recorded clusters of tainted wells in both urban and rural areas, from Riverside County and Sacramento in California to Rapid City, South Dakota and Helena, Montana.

“They are going to have to test more bases,” said Jared Hayes, a senior policy analyst with EWG, in an interview with KFF Health News. “Those 2,805 are going to be a small number when they start testing drinking water wells near every single base.”

The DOD officials are investigating hundreds of current and former domestic U.S. military installations and communities that surround them to determine whether their soil, groundwater or drinking water is contaminated with PFAS chemicals.

The DOD is a major contributor of PFAS pollution nationwide — the result of spills, dumping, or use of industrial solvents, firefighting foam and other substances that contain what has been dubbed forever chemicals because they do not break down in the environment and can accumulate in the human body.

Exposure to PFAS has been associated with health problems such as decreased response to vaccines, some types of cancer, low birth weight and high blood pressure during pregnancy, according to a report published last year by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

A study published this year linked testicular cancer in military personnel to exposure to PFOS, the main type of PFAS chemical used in firefighting foam.

In July, a U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) study estimated that at least 45% of U.S. tap water contains at least one type of PFAS chemical.

USGS researchers tested 716 locations nationwide and found the forever chemicals more frequently in samples that were collected near urban areas and potential sources of PFAS like military installations, airports, industrial sites and wastewater treatment plants, according to Kelly Smalling, a USGS research chemist and lead author of the study.

“We knew we would find PFAS in tap water,” she told KFF Health News in July. “But what was really interesting was the similarities between the private wells and the public supply.”

Drinking water sources near military installations that test above 70 parts per trillion draw immediate action from the DOD. Those responses include providing alternate drinking water sources, treatment or water filtration systems.

Below that threshold, federal officials leave it up to homeowners to weigh and mitigate the health risks of contamination, Hayes said.

“It’s unclear what, if anything, these private individuals are being advised,” Hayes said. “If DoD is saying that 70 parts per trillion is the level they are going to provide clean water … the understanding would be if it’s below that, it must be fine.

The Pentagon bases its 70 parts per trillion standard for PFOS and PFOA chemicals on a 2016 health advisory issued by the EPA. Officials have said they’re waiting for the new federal standard to go into effect before changing DOD parameters.

The DOD did not respond by publication deadline to questions about EWG’s findings, or how it will address the new EPA limits.

While EWG’s examination found that thousands of wells contained PFAS at levels above the new EPA standard, but below the military’s 70 ppt threshold for action, it also learned that the DOD had found 1,800 private wells that registered higher than 70 ppt and had provided mitigation services to the owners of those wells.

Hayes said the combined levels of PFOS and PFOA in some wells were as high as 10,000 ppt.

Hayes said it’s unclear how long people near those military sites have been drinking contaminated water. “Chances are it’s been years, decades,” he said.

Federal law requires public water systems to be monitored regularly for pollutants, but private wells have no similar requirements.

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/forever-chemicals-private-wells-military-bases-kff/

 

New Zealand Government will inform WHO it does not agree to International Health Regulations amendments

Posted on by
5
By Rhoda Wilson | The Exposé

The newly sworn-in New Zealand government intends not to be pushed around by UN resolutions or by the World Health Organisation anymore.

According to a coalition agreement with New Zealand First, the new government will undertake a “National Interest Test” before accepting any agreements from the United Nations or the World Health Organisation’s proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.

To this aim, the New Zealand Cabinet must “reserve against” proposed amendments to International Health Regulations by 1 December 2023.

On Friday, centre-right National signed coalition agreements with libertarian ACT New Zealand and populist New Zealand First allowing the three parties to form a government, bringing an end to six years of left-wing governments in New Zealand.

Yesterday, New Zealand Governor General Cindy Kiro, who represents British monarch King Charles III as head of state, swore National Party leader Christopher Luxon in as New Zealand’s 42nd prime minister along with ministers of his cabinet at Government House in Wellington. Parliament is expected to sit next week and begin working on new policies.

On the day they were signed, Friday, the incoming government released its coalition agreements which outlined a number of policy plans.  You can read the coalition agreement between the New Zealand National Party and ACT New Zealand HERE, and between New Zealand National Party and New Zealand First HERE.

According to the coalition agreement with New Zealand First, one of the most urgent issues the new government must address is that the Cabinet will tell officials not to agree to any policy changes suggested by the World Health Organisation (“WHO”). The coalition agreement states:

Strengthening Democracy and Freedoms

Ensure a ‘National Interest Test’ is undertaken before New Zealand accepts any agreements from the UN and its agencies that limit national decision-making and reconfirm that New Zealand’s domestic law holds primacy over any international agreements.

As part of the above, by 1 December 2023 reserve against proposed amendments to WHO health regulations to allow the incoming government to consider these against a “National Interest Test.”

Coalition Agreement between the National Party and the New Zealand First Party

[…]

Via https://alethonews.com/2023/11/30/new-zealand-government-will-inform-who-it-does-not-agree-to-international-health-regulations-amendments/

Facebook sues FTC, hoping to block ban on monetizing kids’ Facebook data

Posted on by
Reply
Photo illustration in which the Facebook logo is displayed on the screen of an iPhone in front of a Meta logo
Getty Images | Chesnot

Meta (Facebook) sued the Federal Trade Commission yesterday in a lawsuit that challenges the FTC’s authority to impose new privacy obligations on the social media firm.

The complaint stems from the FTC’s May 2023 allegation that Meta-owned Facebook violated a 2020 privacy settlement and the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act. The FTC proposed changes to the 2020 privacy order that would, among other things, prohibit Facebook from monetizing data it collects from users under 18.

Meta’s lawsuit against the FTC challenges what it calls “the structurally unconstitutional authority exercised by the FTC through its Commissioners in an administrative reopening proceeding against Meta.” It was filed against the FTC, Chair Lina Khan, and other commissioners in US District Court for the District of Columbia. Meta is seeking a preliminary injunction to stop the FTC proceeding pending resolution of the lawsuit.

Meta argues that in the FTC’s administrative proceedings, “the Commission has a dual role as prosecutor and judge in violation of the Due Process Clause.” Meta asked the court to “declare that certain fundamental aspects of the Commission’s structure violate the US Constitution, and that these violations render unlawful the FTC Proceeding against Meta.”

Meta says it should have a right to a trial by jury and that “Congress unconstitutionally has delegated to the FTC the power to assign disputes to administrative adjudication rather than litigating them before an Article III court.” The FTC should not be allowed to “unilaterally modify the terms” of the 2020 settlement, Meta said.

The FTC action “would dictate how and when Meta can design its products,” the lawsuit said.

Democrats slam “baseless,” “embarrassing” suit

Meta’s lawsuit was criticized by US Rep. Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-N.J.), the ranking Democrat on the House Commerce Committee. “This lawsuit is embarrassing,” Pallone said in a statement. “It speaks volumes that Meta would rather launch a frivolous lawsuit against the agency tasked by Congress with protecting American consumers, especially our children, than do the serious work needed to reform their platforms.”

Pallone predicted that Meta will lose the lawsuit and called it “a stunt intended to distract from the serious concerns regarding Meta’s social media platforms and business practices.”

US Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) issued a similar criticism. “Meta’s baseless lawsuit is a weak attempt to avoid accountability for its repeated failures to protect kids’ privacy online,” Markey said.

The FTC declined to comment on Meta’s lawsuit when contacted by Ars today.

Meta pins hopes on SCOTUS decision

Meta filed its lawsuit two days after a US District Court ruling that went against the company. Judge Timothy Kelly denied Meta’s motion to block the FTC proceedings, writing that “the Court lacks jurisdiction over claims related to potential changes to the 2020 administrative order and the FTC’s authority to reopen its proceedings and modify that order.”

Meta’s lawsuit cites an April 2023 Supreme Court ruling in Axon Enterprise v. Federal Trade Commission. That ruling “confirmed a new avenue for pre-enforcement challenges to the administrative proceedings of federal agencies,” allowing defendants “to short-circuit the administrative process and go directly to a district court to challenge the proceedings up front,” Columbia Law Professor Ronald Mann explained on SCOTUSblog.

Meta’s lawsuit against the FTC quotes Judge Kelly as saying the case could be subject to a review under the Supreme Court’s Axon precedent:

On November 27, 2023, this Court—per Judge Kelly—denied Meta’s motion. Judge Kelly held that the Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain Meta’s claims in the United States v. Facebook, Inc. action because the 2020 Order was not part of the Court’s Stipulated Order entered in that action. His decision did not address Meta’s constitutional challenges to the structure of the Commission and the FTC Proceeding, but he had explained at oral argument that if he determines that he lacks jurisdiction over the 2020 Order “what has to happen is Meta has to go and file another lawsuit and, maybe, it will be assigned to me, but, maybe, it will be assigned to one of my colleagues, and… whoever it’s assigned to would go through the issue of whether there’s Axon jurisdiction at this point.”

Meta, in addition to filing a lawsuit against the FTC in US District Court, appealed Judge Kelly’s ruling to the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

US: Supreme Court ruling doesn’t help Meta

The US government argued in an August 2023 court filing that the Axon ruling doesn’t give Meta the right to avoid the administrative proceeding. “In Axon, the Supreme Court concluded that district courts retain federal question jurisdiction under the FTC Act to hear a limited subset of claims challenging ‘the structure or very existence of an agency,'” the US said. “The Court was emphatic that it was not expressing ‘newfound enthusiasm’ for immediate judicial review.”

The US said Meta is “hoping to expand Axon beyond its limits,” and that applying the standard in Axon “mandates a conclusion that Meta’s procedural and scope challenges should be raised in a court of appeals after a final Commission decision, and this Court lacks jurisdiction to decide them.”

The FTC alleged that Facebook violated its obligations “by continuing to give app developers access to users’ private information after promising in 2018 to cut off such access if users had not used those apps in the previous 90 days. In certain circumstances, Facebook continued to allow third-party app developers to access that user data until mid-2020.”

Facebook also “misled parents about their ability to control with whom their children communicated through its Messenger Kids app” from late 2017 until mid-2019, the FTC said. “Despite the company’s promises that children using Messenger Kids would only be able to communicate with contacts approved by their parents, children in certain circumstances were able to communicate with unapproved contacts in group text chats and group video calls,” the FTC said.

[…]

Via https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/11/meta-sues-ftc-hoping-to-block-ban-on-monetizing-kids-facebook-data/

Twitter ordered to turn over info on users who interacted with Trump

Posted on by
5
X ordered to turn over info on users who interacted with Trump
©  Getty Images / Drew Angerer

 

RT

The US Justice Department issues a search warrant after media organizations sued over a lack of transparency

The special counsel prosecuting Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump’s alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election, has ordered X (formerly Twitter) to turn over account information on any users who interacted with the former president, according to a heavily redacted search warrant released by the US Department of Justice on Monday.

The warrant requests “all information from the ‘Connect’ or ‘Notifications’ tab for [Trump’s] account, including all lists of Twitter users who have favorited or retweeted tweets posted by the account, as well as all tweets that include the username associated with the account (i.e. ‘mentions’ or ‘replies’).” This is in addition to Trump’s own search history, direct messages, a list of every user he “followed, unfollowed, muted, unmuted, blocked, or unblocked,” and “content of all tweets created, drafted, favorited/liked, or retweeted” by the then-president from October 2020 to January 2021.

Even advertising information, topic preferences, communications with X’s support staff, and data that was deleted but remains available to the platform must be turned over to the prosecutor, according to the document.

“There is no benign or reasonable justification for that demand,” FBI whistleblower Steve Friend opined in a post on X on Tuesday. Many Trump supporters took to X to express their disdain for the order, denouncing Smith as an “enemy of the people” and calling on Congress to defund his investigation.

The Justice Department released the warrant and several other filings in response to a Freedom of Information request from media organizations objecting to the secrecy of the investigation. The existence of the warrant only became public in August with Trump’s indictment, even though special counsel Jack Smith had ordered X to turn over the information in January. The warrant included an order forbidding the company from informing Trump about the search.

While X initially refused to comply due to the gag order, arguing it was a violation of the First Amendment, Smith countered that informing the ex-president would result in “statutorily cognizable harm,” resulting in “destruction of or tampering with evidence, intimidation of potential witnesses, or other serious jeopardy to an investigation or delaying of trial.” The platform ultimately agreed to release the data, but missed a court deadline, resulting in a $350,000 fine for contempt of court.

Trump was indicted in August on charges of conspiring to defraud the United States, conspiring to obstruct an official proceeding, obstructing a congressional proceeding and conspiracy against rights related to his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election. He pleaded not guilty to all charges. While the election-interference case is just one of many felony indictments filed against the Republican this year, he has recently inched ahead of incumbent Joe Biden in polls of likely 2024 voters.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/588287-trump-twitter-interactions-warrant-prosecutor/

Japanese Protesting Sudden Deaths from Covid19 mRNA Vaccines

Posted on by
4

By Dr. William Makis

Click here to watch the video

VIDEO #1 (ABOVE): Oct.27, 2023 – Chubu-Nippon Broadcasting – Kyoto City Demonstrations by 230 families of COVID-19 Vaccine victims (8:33 min).

VIDEO #2: (Oct.28, 2023) Professor Emeritus Yasufumi Murakami of Tokyo University of Science discusses DNA Contamination of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines and TURBO CANCER (6:34 min)

Click here to watch the video

VIDEO #3: (Nov.8, 2022) Nanoparticles – Professor Masayasu Inoue who is Emeritus Professor at Osaka City University School of Medicine:

Click here to watch the video

“We know that vaccine nanoparticles circulate in the bloodstream for several months. In rats, the half-life is 1 week; in humans, it is 10 weeks. Even though they think it hits the muscle, 99% of the time it hits beyond the muscle. It goes into whole body around in about an hour.

This happens to patients at the vaccination site, and patient goes into anaphylactic shock. So it usually happens on the day of the injection, and the nanoparticles that keep circulating in the blood for a long time are the production of nanoparticles(spike).

The messenger (RNA) and spike proteins were detected in the blood of vaccinated people a few months later There’s even a paper that says they were able to detect it, which means that it circulates and enters the cells of all organs.

The liver and spleen are the most common, but the third is bone marrow. The cell division that creates blood cells is extremely intense. The fourth one gathers in the ovaries, and the fifth and sixth ones have testicular conditions. The vaccine is concentrated in the organs that create the next generation in both women and men.”

VIDEO 04 – (Nov.16, 2023) Clinic Director from Ginza, Tokyo shares his observation on his vaccinated patients (Turbo Cancer):

Click here to watch the video

When we started administering the vaccine, some patients, for example, had been able to control their cancer like pancreatic cancer, for a long time, and after the second or third vaccine, it suddenly became serious, and this May, When the highest number of deaths occurred around June, there were times when around 5 people died per month. Around May and June, we saw the highest number of these cases, with roughly five patients per month succumbing to their illnesses.

Then, we are seeing patients with conditions like giant cell diabetes or light cell leukemia — diseases that are very rare and not often encountered in clinical practice. The cardiovascular specialist told them that they had never seen such diseases before though he read about them in books. I’m still wondering why there are so many people like this.”

VIDEO 05 – (Nov.12, 2023) Announcement from Japanese obstetricians and gynecologists to pregnant women and those who want to become pregnant about the coronavirus vaccine

Click here to watch the video

“Major illnesses and abnormalities that have never been seen before are being found in pregnant women who received the new coronavirus vaccine during or before pregnancy. Pregnant women have a stronger blood clotting effect than usual to protect themselves from bleeding during childbirth. Then, administering the new coronavirus vaccine will make thrombosis much more likely to occur, putting you at greater risk of thrombosis than necessary. Blood clots can occur not only in the pregnant woman but also in the baby, making it difficult for blood to flow to the baby, causing blood clots to get stuck in the placenta, and other dangerous situations. The coronavirus vaccine is currently under research and its safety is not guaranteed. Please make your decisions carefully!”

VIDEO 06 – (Nov. 6, 2023) Japan’s largest national news broadcaster NHK just mentioned COVID-19 vaccine deaths!

Click here to watch the video

Regarding a woman in her 50s in the prefecture who died the day after receiving the new coronavirus vaccine – awarded 44 million yen (approx 300K USD). Nationally, over 2000+ vaccine deaths applications still in process.

VIDEO 07 – Japanese people take to the streets to make the general public aware of the harms of covid vaccines (Oct. 30, 2023)

Click here to read the full article.

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/video-japanese-protesting-sudden-deaths-covid-19-mrna-vaccines/5841617

WHO notified that Netherlands can only be bound by IHR amendments after approval by Parliament, and that hasn’t happened

Posted on by
4

Rhoda WilsonOn Tuesday, Member of the Netherlands Parliament Wybren van Haga wrote to the World Health Organisation’s (“WHO’s”) Director-General, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, to inform him that the 2022 amendments to the International Health Regulations (“IHR”) are subject to the formal approval by the Dutch Parliament.

“I notify you, in my capacity as Member of Parliament, of the reservation that the 2022 [IHR] amendments require the approval of the Dutch government before the 2022 amendments can enter into force in The Netherlands,” he told Tedros.

In May 2022 the World Health Assembly (“WHA”) quietly agreed to reduce the period during which nations have to opt out of future IHR amendments. For nations to retain the longer 18-month period previously allowed for nations to opt-out, countries need to send WHO a short note that they are opting out of the amendments decided by the WHA in 2022 before 1 December 2023.

“Pursuant to the 2022 Amendments the period for rejection of amendments to the IHR 2005 is reduced from 18 months to 10 months after adoption and notification. The 2022 Amendments reduce the possibility for members of WHO to reject or make reservations to amendments of the IHR 2005. That is why we object to the 2022 Amendments,” Mr. van Haga informed Tedros.

Mr. van Haga requested that Tedros make his letter part of the public record and publish it on WHO’s website. He has sent a copy of his letter to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands, Mrs. Bruins Slot, to the general secretariat of the European Union, to the chair of both houses of the Dutch Parliament and to the chair of the European Parliament.

In June 2023, MP Pepijn van Houwelingen’s parliamentary request to block the Dutch Cabinet from approving the new WHO “treaty” was backed by thirty lawmakers.

The 30 MPs sent a letter to the chair of the Dutch Parliament stating that Parliament’s approval of the 2022 amendments to the IHR was required because these amendments are a treaty or a protocol to a treaty and as such, they require the approval of the Dutch Parliament.

Effectively, instead of adopting WHO’s IHR amendments outright, the Dutch Cabinet must now submit a bill to the House of Representatives, where lawmakers will then debate the bill before it’s put to a vote.

On 25 October, Mr. van Houwelingen tweeted that the government had informed WHO that it does not agree to the 2022 IHR amendments.

Pepijn van Houwelingen on Twitter, 25 October 2023

Mr. van Haga noted Mr. van Houwelingen’s tweet in his letter to Tedros:

Member of Parliament Pepijn van Houwelingen indicated on Twitter, on October 25th 2023, that a formal notice would be sent on behalf of the Kingdom of The Netherlands to WHO that the 2022 Amendments would be subject to the formal approval by the Dutch Parliament. This notice constitutes a formal reservation on behalf of the Kingdom of The Netherlands that it can only be bound by the 2022 Amendments after the Dutch Parliament has approved the 2022 Amendments [See letter from MP Pepijn van Houwelingen to the Chairman of the House of Representatives dated 21 June 2023 HERE.]

Until now, no evidence of such notice to WHO on the reservation has been received by us. I notify you, in my capacity of Member of Parliament, of the reservation that the 2022 Amendments require the approval of the Dutch Parliament before the 2022 Amendments can enter into force in The Netherlands.

As the group of Members of the European Parliament had done, Mr. van Haga also brought to Tedros’ attention that the IHR amendments were “adopted” in May 2022 “without a normal voting procedure being in place.”

“The chair to the meeting simply asked whether anybody objected to the 2022 Amendments,” Mr. van Haga said and provided a link to THIS video which, at the time of writing this article, is no longer available.

Mr. van Haga’s letter continued:

Pursuant to Article 60 paragraph (b) of the WHO Constitution, General Assembly decisions on other questions than those subject to a two-thirds requirement “shall be made by a majority of the Members present and voting.”

This means that a record must be made of which Members are present and the outcome of the voting procedure. This requirement was not met.

Therefore, the 2022 Amendments must be considered null and void, if there is no proof of a vote.

Pursuant to Article 55 paragraph 2 of the IHR 2005, the text of any proposed amendment needs to be communicated to all States Parties by the Director-General at least 4 months before the Health Assembly. This requirement was also not observed.

You can read Mr. van Haga’s full letter to WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus below, as taken from the article ‘A member of the Dutch Parliament has challenged the WHO’s procedures when the May 2022 amendments were approved’ published by Dr. Meryl Nass.

[…]

Via https://expose-news.com/2023/11/30/netherlands-can-only-be-bound-by-ihr-after/

New Zealand Database Administrator Who Designed System For “Providers” To Get Paid Per Shot Given, Tearfully Confesses To STAGGERINGLY High Death Counts

Posted on by
9

Celia Farber

A database administrator in New Zealand has given NZ politician, journalist, and attorney Liz Gunn a data leak about deaths following Covid shots in New Zealand that shows what she calls “eye watering” death counts, in some cases over 30% of the injected at a given site died. “This data is a river of tears, and I can’t go on with it,” the man, occasionally breaking down, and seeming to show signs of PTSD, tells Gunn:

“It has to stop now.” He says his data is “…impossible to deny” as it is hard, government data, of 2.2 million people in New Zealand who were injected.

There is an additional bombshell in all this that made my jaw drop immediately, namely the fact that he built the system that collected this data as a system to pay each “provider” for each shot they administered. I could not, as I listened, understand why Liz Gunn, whose work I admire greatly, did not jump all over this. Is this not in itself a massive scandal? One we knew of of course—Covid Payola—but never met anybody who designed the payment system.

Who commissioned the “get paid per shot” system for the “providers?” Clearly, these ATMs for murder by injection have been operating all over the world. Does anybody agree this is an undetonated bomb in this interview?

Deaths, Says Data Scientist, 100% Definitely Caused By Shots, Mostly Pfizer—Now What?

[…]

The crude death rate for NZ is 0.75%—and has held stable for a long time, including during the so-called ‘“Covid Pandemic” of 2020. Following the rollout, the excess death rates in certain cohorts rises above 30%/ For example: A place called Queens Park Medical—837 persons were injected, of those, 253 dies, which is 30.2%

He shows a rundown during which excess deaths are spiking every single day, at about the same rate.

The interview between Liz Gunn and whistleblower, “Winston Smith” is here.

Things that may bother you (us):

  1. Why didn’t he come out sooner? (He says the data wasn’t truly ready sooner.)
  2. Why, when he is suffering such trauma from sitting with these murder statistics, does he still say he is “…not antivaxx?” What, exactly, does it take?
  3. Ignore, (if I may,) his commentary about Carl Sagan, Science Heroica, the shape of the earth, how labour/left he is, the streets named after Lenin where he grew up…just look straight at his numbers. It IS interesting that opposing death by Pharma poison is “right wing.” (The two wings are: 1. truth 2. obstruction of truth.)
  4. Craig Paardekooper’s site is not “Find My Batch,” it’s “How Bad Is My Batch?” Link here. And here is an interview with Paardekooper from one year ago.
  5. Overall: I thank him, believe him, salute him, and hope there are many more like him about to emerge.

Dylan Oakley: “The dam wall around Covid-1984 of lies and deception is about to burst with the weight of truth and disclosure.”

[…]

MAORI WERE ESPECIALLY TARGETED:

See the paid, sophisticated genocide via media here. They had special TV channels reporting in the Mãori native language of ‘te reo Mãori’ (“te reo” means “the language,”) breathlessly on Maori vaccination rates. In one graph, for one region, it’s just under 90%

“Māori Television, a government-funded channel committed to broadcasting primarily in Te Reo, began in March 2004.[84]” [Wikipedia]

God help them. Globalists/Cabal colonialists have found the perfect way to purge indigenous people all over the world in their communist-land grab agenda: First make sure they eat a lot of sugar and junk food, keep them both traumatized and condescended to, then make sure they line up for Government Love in the form of “vaccines,” that are drop dead effective.

Interview clip with Liz Gunn, in which she describes a strong, Maori warrior man breaking down sobbing and telling her: “Liz, I have been to 60 funerals in 11 months. I can’t carry one more coffin.”

This is why Reiner Fuellmich was so hopeful that it would be the Maori who would bring the whole thing down.

[…]

Via https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/new-zealand-database-administrator?r=83qir

NZ Whistleblower Reveals 30% Death Rate with “Bad” Batch of Pfizer Vaccine

Posted on by
1

As the whistleblower emphasizes, this is a very small country and when you have in a town of 54,000 people like Invercargill one vaccinator who is responsible for continuing to vaccinate men and women when 30% of the vaccinees have passed away, it is shocking and damning, and that person is responsible in all terms of the Nuremberg Laws.