The Most Revolutionary Act

Uncensored updates on world events, economics, the environment and medicine

The Most Revolutionary Act
Unknown's avatar

About stuartbramhall

Retired child and adolescent psychiatrist and American expatriate in New Zealand. In 2002, I made the difficult decision to close my 25-year Seattle practice after 15 years of covert FBI harassment. I describe the unrelenting phone harassment, illegal break-ins and six attempts on my life in my 2010 book The Most Revolutionary Act: Memoir of an American Refugee.

62 Israeli military vehicles destroyed in 4 days

The Palestinian Resistance has inflicted major losses on the Israeli occupation forces, destroying dozens of Israeli military vehicles in just our days.

The Resistance fighters in Gaza are still defending the strip and confronting the invading Israeli forces in Gaza City on numerous fronts as they continue to invade from the west of Beit Lahia and Beit Hanoun in the north, al-Qassam Brigades spokesperson Abu Obeida said on Friday.

Abu Obeida revealed that 62 Israeli military vehicles had been destroyed in four days, including the flagship Israeli Merkava tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, and bulldozers, using the Yassin 105 tandem anti-tank RPGs and IEDs.

Al-Qassam Brigades used improvised explosive devices, small arms, and sniper rifles to target gatherings of Israeli soldiers or infantry forces shielding themselves in residential buildings.

Al-Qassam killed at least nine Israeli soldiers who were outside their IFVs in two separate operations that took place three days ago, the spokesperson revealed.

Moreover, Abu Obeida said the Palestinian Resistance forces attached two Israeli military jeeps using anti-armor shells on Thursday morning northwest of Beit Lahia.

The Palestinian Resistance on Thursday also successfully destroyed a home in Beit Hanoun that was being used as a military site by Israeli occupation forces using anti-armor and anti-infantry shells, which led to numerous casualties.

The Palestinian Resistance is inflicting heavy losses on the Israeli occupation forces by hunting down and destroying any military vehicle they see, which is forcing them to withdraw on some fronts and axes, as well as changing their entire trajectories at times, he said.

The Resistance, according to Abu Obeida, has prepared itself “for a lengthy, dynamic, and ongoing defensive operation that could take place on all fronts.”

Losses to continue mounting

“Every minute the occupation forces spend in Gaza will be met with resounding and paramount failures,” he added, revealing that the al-Qassam artillery forces were attacking all mobilized Israeli forces within Gaza.

The artillery forces “continue to bomb all of the enemy’s forces in the invaded area and gatherings in Gaza and its parameters using small-range rockets and mortar shells while still launching rockets at Tel Aviv and Askalan.”

“We have documented and shared plenty of scenes showing our destruction of Israeli military vehicles and targeting of its soldiers, and we will continue to share footage down the line,” he added.

Abu Obeida touched on the crimes committed by the occupation against hospitals in the Gaza Strip, emphasizing that it seeks to “prove baseless lies and imaginary command centers” through these actions.

“The Nazi occupation forces barged with tanks into a medical complex to showcase strength and control is the biggest evidence of its failure, as well as a disgrace to the international institutions of human rights and international law,” he stressed.

Multi-front fight

Furthermore, he praised the people of the West Bank and “the fighters of our Ummah who rushed to engage in Operation al-Aqsa Flood,” urging them to escalate against the enemy on all fronts and in all forms.

He addressed the Israeli settlers, who are “deceived by their fascist government,” telling them that the casualties among the occupation army soldiers in the field are “much more than you expect, and you will receive news of them, sooner or later.”

Regarding the Israeli prisoners in the Gaza Strip, Abu Obaida explained that the resistance “wanted this issue to be a humanitarian one,” reminding that the “motivation for Operation al-Aqsa Flood is your government’s extremist and criminal attack on our prisoners in the jails.”

“We have proposed reaching a prisoner exchange deal since the start of the operation, and we have tried and are fighting to preserve the lives of your captives. We were successful at times, and we did not at others due to your army’s brutal bombing campaigns,” he concluded.

For example, earlier in the day, al-Qassam revealed that Israeli captive Aryeh Zalman Zedmanovich, whose ID number is 0010185791, was recently taken to a care center because of the habitual panic attacks he would suffer due to the repeated Israeli bombings where he was being held.

Zedmanovich was receiving medical attention in captivity, with al-Qassam sharing footage of him before his death, wherein medical personnel were tending to him.

He kept having panic attacks until they got too much and he wound up dying because of one.

Demonstrations took over “Tel Aviv”, on Tuesday, as families of the Israeli captives in the Gaza Strip took to the streets, escalating pressure on the government of Israeli occupation government’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, demanding answers amid conflicting news regarding a possible exchange deal with the Palestinian Resistance, mediated by Egypt and Qatar and with a US blessing.

The settlers protesting Netanyahu’s government, carrying pictures of their children who are being held captive in the Strip, demanded “Netanyahu and the government give us answers and measures,” stressing that they “no longer have the strength.”

[…]

Via https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/62-israeli-military-vehicles-destroyed-in-4-days–abu-obeida

From Jabs to Brainwashing: The Unrelenting Attack on America’s Youth

Story at-a-glance

  • As people have become aware of the dangers of the COVID shots, they’ve also started questioning conventional vaccines, and many parents who didn’t get their children vaccinated during the pandemic are not taking them in to catch up on their routine shots now
  • Vaccinations aren’t the only thing forced upon our children that is doing them more harm than good. The public education system also poses a massive threat to our children, as the indoctrination and brainwashing spans from kindergarten to high school and beyond
  • The current educational system completely ignores everything we know about child development and brain development, and by not allowing proper brain development to occur, the school system impairs children’s ability to think critically
  • Using medication to bring fever down often does more harm than good. A fever is your body’s way of killing off invading pathogens and clearing out inflammatory toxins, so by lowering your fever, you’re prolonging the problem
  • Avoid acetaminophen when sick. Acetaminophen depletes your body of glutathione, which you need for speedy healing

Interview link: https://www.bitchute.com/video/wuJeNIHpVHYG/

In this interview, Dr. Lawrence (Larry) Palevsky, a practicing pediatrician, discusses the impact that mainstream propaganda narratives have on our children, and why it’s so important to get your children out of the public education system. He also reviews some of the foundational strategies for staying healthy, and how to treat those dreaded childhood fevers.

Palevsky has been one of the medical experts speaking out against the COVID shots, but he was a pro-choice, vaccine safety advocate long before COVID. Clearly, the COVID jab is the most dangerous “vaccine” in history, but all vaccines are fundamentally flawed and come with risks.

Palevsky, who graduated from the NYU School of Medicine in 1987, initially became concerned about vaccines in 1991, when the New York State Department of Health started to mandate hepatitis B vaccine for all infants.

“I had no comments about vaccines per se at that time,” he says, “but it just raised the red flag to me. Why are we giving a vaccine to a population that has never suffered from hepatitis B infections and where we can give the mother hepatitis B vaccine, or give the kid a hepatitis B vaccine if the mother was surface antigen positive?

[…]

The COVID Shot Debacle

While many doctors have lost their medical licenses for refusing to give vaccines, especially in the COVID era, Palevsky’s livelihood was never threatened in that way, probably because he doesn’t have hospital privileges, doesn’t use electronic medical records, doesn’t sell vaccines and rarely writes prescriptions.

So, there’s little in terms of track record of what he’s doing clinically, other than what his patients might have to say. He’s also not selling any kind of alternative to vaccination. And, since he hadn’t offered childhood vaccinations for two decades, nothing changed when the COVID jab came out.

[…]

Obviously, I couldn’t agree more. It’s a bioweapon, and it seems to be particularly pernicious to the young who have no clinical need for it. Children’s risk of dying from COVID is negligible, and that was clear from the start. The primary reason for jabbing children was to protect the elderly, which is completely unethical. Hence, children can only receive harm from the jab, and we’re seeing that in spades.

[…]

COVID Jabs Opened Pandora’s Box

According to experts, sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) appears to be primarily related to immunizations. After the release of the COVID jabs, we suddenly started seeing adults dropping dead for no apparent reason, a phenomenon dubbed sudden adult death syndrome (SADS).

Still, even though most of the SADS cases are happening among those who got the COVID jab, it hasn’t been causally linked. Curiously, between 2020 and 2023, SIDS rates actually dropped from historical norms, and Palevsky believes this is because many parents weren’t taking their children in for their routine primary care visits due to lockdowns and fear of going out in general.

One silver lining of all this is that as people have become aware of the radical dangers of the COVID shots, they’ve also started questioning conventional vaccines, and many parents who didn’t get their children vaccinated during the pandemic are not taking them in to catch up on their routine shots now.

 

[…]

The Public School System Is Destroying Our Children

Vaccinations aren’t the only thing forced upon our children that is doing them more harm than good. The public education system also poses a massive threat to our kids.

The obvious conclusion for anyone who has investigated these issues is that you cannot put your children into the public school system because the indoctrination and brainwashing is so pervasive, and spans from kindergarten to high school and beyond. They’re quite literally destroying the brains of our children.

[…]

Public Education Was Always About Control

Children are also taught NOT to question. That’s the quickest way to get into trouble. So, they basically cannot afford to think differently than what they’re told. By not allowing proper brain development to occur, the school system has created, and continues to create, figurative automatons, human robots, whose ability to think critically has been severely impaired.

The government and media are further exacerbating the situation with fear propaganda. As just one example, many children, teens, and even young adults nowadays believe that life on earth will cease to exist within their lifetime — and that it’s their fault simply for living!

They believe we must eliminate efficient energy production, farming, food production and mechanically suck carbon out of the air in order to survive, when the complete opposite is true. All those things will kill huge swaths of humanity and lower our standard of living to pre-industrial times. We’re talking about living conditions that few modern era people would survive due to sheer lack of know-how.

[…]

How to Combat the Programming

So, how can you counter all this brainwashing? Here are Palevsky’s suggestions:

1. Turn off your TV and radically limit the amount of time you allow your children to watch TV. Also, be selective in what you allow them to watch.

2. Stop reading mainstream news and look for reliable alternative sources that aren’t regurgitating the official narrative.

3. If you do keep your children in the public or private school system, have conversations with your children at home.

Ask them, “What’d you learn today? What do you think about what you learned today? How did it make you feel? Did you have an opposing view? Were you able to express an opposing view? What happened if you did? Did the teacher allow it or did the teacher not allow it?” Cultivate an opportunity at home for your child to go through a process of critical thinking.

4. Consider homeschooling. There are many options available for parents these days, including co-op classes, online curriculums, nature schools and more.

[…]

Live in Sync With Nature to Avoid Seasonal Colds and Flus

Getting back to vaccinations, this fall they started pushing not only the seasonal influenza vaccine and an updated COVID shot, but also a brand-new RSV vaccine. Do you really need any of these? Palevsky believes there are far better ways to stay healthy during the winter season.

“Most people are not aware that the flu is not caused by a viral illness,” he says. “I’m not saying there are no viruses. What I’m saying is that we’re looking at the wrong cause for the illness. The virus isn’t the cause of the illness. The virus is a bystander …

The reason you get sick in the fall, winter, and early spring is because we live out of season. We live out of schedule of the season. We eat improperly out of season. We don’t sleep enough, we don’t rest enough, we don’t eat the warm foods; instead we’re eating cold foods and summer foods.

We don’t take our vitamin D and K2, we don’t eat soups and our broths, we don’t slow down. Anytime we live out of sync of nature, we are causing stress to our body. Farmers used to go to bed at sunset and wake up at sunrise. But when the day gets darker earlier, and we’re up six, eight hours past when the sun goes down — that’s stress.

And one thing that the body has to do, because it can’t keep stress, is to get rid of it. If you accumulate enough of it, you’re going to get sick. We think the reason we get sick is because there’s some magical virus going around. Well, that’s not true.

The reason you get sick is because you’re stressed, you’re living out of [sync with] nature, you’re not eating right, you’re not sleeping right, you’re not resting right, you’re not dressing right, you’re overdoing it when your body should be quieter and you’re creating too much stress.

We’re eating lots of refined sugar, seed oils, hydrogenated oils — these are toxins and are all stressors. And so we have to get sick because the body is made to heal. Too much stress, it’s got to come out. And that’s what an illness is.

[…]

The Benefits of Fever

Colds and flus typically generate a fever, but fever can also develop in the absence of a viral or bacterial infection, and using medication to bring the fever down often does more harm than good. A fever is your body’s way of killing off invading pathogens and clearing out inflammatory toxins, so by lowering your fever, you’re prolonging the problem.

[…]

Treating Fever From a Clinical Perspective

So, in conclusion, most fevers do not need to be treated or brought down. The warning signs you want to look out for, regardless of the exact temperature of the fever, is their general demeanor.

That said, if your child is younger than 3 months old, contact your pediatrician if he or she develops a fever. If a child between the ages of 3 months to 2 years has a fever above 102.5 F. and there’s no obvious source, a common concern is bacteremia (bacterial infection), which can be diagnosed with a blood or urine test.

How to Treat a Fever

[…]

“The most important thing when a child has a fever is to ‘pull the plug,’ meaning keep stimulation to a minimum. So, turn the lights down, quiet the environment, lie down with the child. If there’s anything that I’ve seen work over the years, is a parent lying with the child. It’s amazing what healing that can do.

Warm bath — not a cold bath — a warm bath, because what a warm bath does is it makes the body sweat, and when the body sweats the temperature of the body can slowly go down because the evaporation of the sweat causes the body to cool.

[…]

Via https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2023/11/19/safeguard-your-kids-health-and-future.aspx

 

 

Do EMF and Wireless Devices Endanger Children’s Health?

One of the many goals for wrapping the planet in a pulsating dome of 5G electromagnetic frequencies is to increase the human community’s connectivity with each other.  We are invited to imagine the spectacular wonder of a single integral system for communication, financial efficiency, international banking and transportation, and a large variety of technological tools at our fingertips to ease life’s struggles. There is also a darker specter to monitor every movement of the world’s growing population. Consequently, wireless electromagnetic frequency radiation (EMF) and microwave exposure are becoming increasingly more omnipresent and will continue to permeate every aspect of our common daily lives without any escape.

Yet the warnings about the health risks and effects from EMF exposure, especially for vulnerable populations such as children, have been well documented for many decades and go unheeded. Aside from a casual nod by those who are mandated to regulate EMF levels and monitor its adverse risks, the scientific evidence for a crucial cause of alarm continues to mount, and this is especially true for protecting children from unnecessary EMF, which is now indisputable. Federal agency capture by the telecom industry and the developers of wireless, microwave and other EMF producing technologies have thwarted every effort to properly regulate this technology.

Children are exposed to EMF from various wireless devices, such as smartphones, tablets, and Wi-Fi routers. Although these devices generally comply with FCC guidelines, there are serious concerns about the cumulative effects of exposure, particularly for children who use wireless devices extensively. Studies show that children’s exposure to EMF from wireless devices far exceeds recommended safety limits, especially when devices are held close to the body for prolonged periods.

By examining available research studies conducted by prominent scientists and institutions to better understand the crisis facing children who are increasingly being exposed to EMF can guide parents and communities to take necessary precautions to protect our children.

Perhaps the most important study investigating the impact of EMF emissions from electronic devices on adolescent social and brain development is the multi-institutional Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, which enrolled 10,000 children and followed them for a decade. Those who spent the most hours per day on cell phones, computers and other wireless items had the highest rate of rapid thinning of the cortex, which is associated with premature aging.

Cancer Risk

A dozen years ago, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified electromagnetic fields as “possibly carcinogenic to humans.” Research conducted by prominent scientists, such as Lennart Hardell and Michael Carlberg in Sweden, has identified links between long-term exposure to electromagnetic fields and an increased risk of childhood leukemia. These studies analyzed data from children exposed to various sources of electromagnetic radiation, including power lines and wireless devices. Since then other studies have confirmed that children living in the proximity of overhead high-voltage power lines had a higher risk of developing leukemia, further supporting EMF’s potential carcinogenic effects. This is not only true for thermal radiation, but also for non-thermal low intensity non-ionizing radiation now believed to be contributing to the rising incidence of brain cancers, notably glioblastomas, in children and adolescents across developed nations.

Government regulators fail to address this danger. The Environmental Health Trust (EHT) notes that government regulations for wireless cell phone use were evaluated upon the anatomical basis of a 220-pound man’s head. Children’s heads are notably smaller, their skulls are thinner, and therefore children “can absorb up to ten times the radiation in the bone marrow of their skulls than adults.” A University of Utah analysis reported that EMF exposure increases by a compounding rate of 10-15 percent for every millimeter closer to a mobile phone’s antenna. EHT criticizes the FCC cell phone radiation standards for ignoring these “unique vulnerabilities” in children’s anatomy as well as pregnant women. Younger brains will also proportionally absorb more radiation into the eye and the brain’s grey matter.

Another carcinogenic risk is electronic radiation’s disruption of stem cell activity. Throughout the course of their development, children have more active stem cells than adults. Stem cells are far more sensitive to microwave radiation than are differentiated cells. This makes children more susceptible to DNA double strand breaks contributing carcinogenic mutations.

Neurological and Cognitive Effects

EMF’s deleterious effects on the nervous system are well documented. Despite oxygen’s crucial role in biological reactions, oxygen can also contribute to toxic by-products known as reactive oxygen species (ROS), which damage proteins, lipids and DNA.  However the body’s antioxidant defense system keeps radical oxygen under control.  A Turkish review of the medical literature shows that several studies report that EMF exposure results in oxidative stress in different tissues, cellular DNA and will increase free radical concentrations.

Early experimental studies conducted by Nora Volkow and her colleagues showed that exposure to cell phone radiation can alter brain activity in regions closest to the antenna. These studies utilized brain-imaging techniques to measure changes in brain metabolism and neuronal activity after exposure to electromagnetic fields. Consequently quantifying abnormal changes was very precise. The clinical significance of Volkow’s findings raised concerns about the potential neurological effects of long-term exposure to electromagnetic radiation, which have since been validated in multiple further studies.

Separate studies by the University of Southern California and UCLA suggest an association between prenatal exposure due to maternal mothers’ cell phone radiation and neurodevelopmental disorders in their children afterwards. These studies highlight the critical importance of considering the potential risks of electromagnetic radiation during the crucial stages of child development.  A Yale University mouse study found that pregnant mice when exposed to cell phone signals give birth to animals with hyperactivity and impaired memory.

Genetic Damage

There is a large body of animal research confirming EMF’s adverse effects on genetic expression and DNA integrity. However, more clinical trials on humans need to be conducted to bring the crisis to greater public attention. EMF’s long term effects on the male and female reproductive systems of pre-pubescent children needs to be investigated more thoroughly.  Given the rapid rise of gender dysphoria beginning in earlier ages, it is incumbent to better understand EMF’s impact on child development now that wireless devices are being used daily. Interruption of the reproductive system’s  metabolomics from mobile phone EMF exposure has a broad range of adverse effects.  These include decreases in sperm motility, protein synthesis disorders, abnormal nitric oxide levels and antioxidant disruption in germ cells. Research also indicates that EMF exposure affects calcium ion channels, potentially disrupting intracellular calcium signaling, which plays a crucial role in cellular processes

Sleep Disturbances

Sleep is crucial for the proper physical and cognitive development of children. However, exposure to electromagnetic fields from wireless devices may disrupt sleep patterns in children. A 2010 study found that exposure to radiofrequency EMF from mobile phone base stations was associated with sleep disturbances. Similarly, another study reported an association between exposure to electromagnetic fields from wireless devices in the home and sleep disturbances in adolescents.

Education and Awareness

Public activism needs to pressure child health associations and government agencies to revise regulations regarding EMF exposure limits. This includes establishing specific guidelines for non-ionizing radiation, considering cumulative exposure effects, and incorporating research findings on potential long-term health risks associated with EMF.

Given the increasing data being gathered as research continues to identify EMF’s effects on human biology, the precautionary principle, critically for children, should be applied.  Once the technology is developed to dramatically lessen radiation exposure, it is essential to limit childhood exposure and especially in schools and bedrooms where children spend a substantial amount of time during every 24-hour cycle.

Organizations like the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend limiting children’s exposure to wireless devices. Although the Academy emphasizes the importance of educating parents, teachers, and healthcare professionals about EMF’s risks, no notable funding has been spent to make these health concerns a national emergency.

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/do-emf-wireless-devices-endanger-children-health/5825545

 

US Pulling Out of Illegal Iraqi Bases Following Drone Attacks

Fire Burns Through U.S. Military Equipment At Iraqi Air Base After 56th Drone Attack (Videos) by Islamic Resistance (IRI)

On November 17 morning, a large fire broke out at hangers housing United States military aircraft and equipment in al-Harir US Air Base in the Erbil province of the northern Iraqi region of Kurdistan after a drone attack.

[Note: All reprisals by Islamic Resistance groups (IRI) are described in Western Media as ‘IRANIAN ATTACKS’]

The Islamic Resistance in Iraq (IRI), a coalition of armed militias, which includes fighters of Shiite armed groups that fought against terrorists of the Islamic State terrorist group, claimed responsibility for the attack on the air base, saying in a statement that it was carried out “in response to the crimes committed by the enemy [Israel] against people in Gaza.”

The group formed a special operations room to support Palestinian armed factions following the October 17 Al-Ahli Arab Hospital massacre.

The ongoing attacks obliged the U.S. to reinforce its bases in the Middle East with more than 1,200 troops and a dozen air defense systems. Nevertheless, Washington continues to provide Israel with unconditional support.

Two more attacks against U.S. forces were reported after the Pentagon’s update. A salvo of rockets hit the Conoco Mission Support Site in the eastern Syria governorate of Deir Ezzor late on November 14.

Another rocket attack targeted the Ayn al-Assad Air Base in the western Iraqi province of al-Anbat on November 15 morning.

United States forces have been attacked 55 times in Iraq and Syria since October 17, the Pentagon revealed on November 14…. southfront.press/ The U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) has not yet commented on the recent attacks on al-Harir, Ain al-Assad and Tell Beydar base

MH-47G Chinook and MH-60M Black Hawk helicopters as well as MQ-1C Gray Eagle combat drones of the U.S. elite 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment are usually deployed in al-Harir Air Base, right near the hangars which were set on fire by the drone attack

Iraq military bases: US pulling out of three key sites – BBC News The US army is pulling out of al-Qaim and two other key military bases in Iraq in the coming weeks. For years Iraq and Syria have been demanding US forces leave their countries.

[…]

A few hours after the attack on al-Harir, the IRI announced that it had hit two other bases hosting U.S. troops with suicide drones, Ain al-Assad Air Base in the western Iraqi province of al-Anbar and Tell Beydar base

Realistically the US bases in Syria have little future if it finally leaves its illegal and attacked bases in Iraq. The excuse that it’s there to fight ISIS resurgence is like a self fulfilling prophecy. The US is also the hated author of the continuing Caesar Act Sanctions, a kind of ‘sour grapes punishment’, stupidly and cruelly condemning the population (and Lebanon) to continued blockade and penury, even as Syria is readmitted as an Arab partner State.

[…]

[…]

Late news:

The US is reportedly pulling out of 3 of its main Iraqi bases as drone and missile attacks in Syria and Iraq reach over 60 (18/11)23) amid worldwide anger at their support for Israeli Genocide in Gaza.

The US has recently been reinforcing its repeatedly attacked main El Beyder base in Hasakah and flying aggressive air sorties over Syria.

The US is also being attacked in their one base in their one southern Syria, al-Tanf base, dubbed as an ‘ISIS Training Center’, and in their Deir Ezzor Bases (Omar,Green Village)..in the Arabic tribal area south of Hasakah in Syria, where they are always accused of Trump’s boast of stealing Syrian oil, and are forcing the SDF to act as their reluctant police force.

[…]

The IRI formed a special operations room to support Palestinian armed factions in Gaza and began launching attacks against U.S. forces in Iraq and neighboring Syria following the October 17 Al-Ahli Arab Hospital massacre.

So far, the Pentagon admitted that 58 attacks have targeted U.S. forces in Iraq and Syria, ‘lightly wounding’ more than 50 troops.

The CENTCOM launched several retaliatory strikes against targets linked to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in the eastern Syrian governorate of Deir Ezzor in an attempt to deter the IRI. However, the number of attacks on U.S. forces appears to be increasing.

[…]

Via https://thefreeonline.com/2023/11/18/us-to-pull-out-of-3-key-bases-amid-dozens-of-attacks-in-iraq-and-syria-due-to-ongoing-us-backing-of-gaza-genocide-threat-to-rojava-sdf/

Media now blaming COVID jab-related heart attacks and strokes on CLIMATE CHANGE

Media now blaming COVID jab-related heart attacks and strokes on CLIMATE CHANGE
Dr Eddy Betterman

The latest excuse from the establishment for rising rates of heart attack and stroke is “extreme heat waves spawned by climate change.”

A new study, we are told, links a surge in cardiovascular deaths to really warm temperatures, which apparently hurt people who are black and old at disproportionately higher rate than other demographics.

Instead of addressing the elephant in the room – Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “vaccines” – the paper instead talks a whole lot about the weather and “greenhouses gas emissions” as being responsible for about 5,500 excess cardiovascular deaths every year.

Even if the United States adopts many of the extreme global warming impositions being pushed by the globalists right now, it will only trim about 1,200 excess deaths off that figure, still leaving 4,300 excess deaths per year due to weather-related heart problems, the study insists.

According to the researchers involved with the study, everyone except white people – of course – bear the highest risk of suffering a heart attack or stroke due to bad weather, which means something has to be done to give them special treatment.

“The public health impact of climate change is falling on individuals who live on the margins of our society,” claims Sameed Khatana, a cardiologist and assistant professor at the University of Pennsylvania‘s Perelman School of Medicine.

“Any policy action or mitigation efforts really need to be tailored towards individuals who are most vulnerable.”

Is it extreme heat or COVID jabs that are killing the human heart?

An earlier model put together by Khatana and his colleagues at Penn claims that deaths from heart attack and stroke rise in direct relation to the number of “extreme heat days” that occur in a given year.

“Extreme heat days,” by the way, is defined as having a heat index – a measure of apparent temperature that is a product of ambient temperature and relative humidity – that is at or above 90 degrees Fahrenheit.

Using data collected from all 3,108 counties in the contiguous U.S. between the years of 2008 and 2017, the team claims to have found that the more really hot days there are, the more people are dying from heart issues.

By the year 2019, the so-called “experts” say, there were 54 extreme heat days per year, on average, resulting in about 1,651 climate-related deaths every year.

Keep in mind that this is a very small proportion of the overall number of cardiovascular deaths that occur in the U.S. every year. It is a mere drop in the bucket, relatively speaking, and points to an agenda that has been on the rise in recent years ever since Operation Warp Speed.

To keep a lid on the flood of heart-related deaths that have occurred ever since COVID jabs were unleashed, “science” is desperately seeking some other alternative excuse to cover for this mass pharmaceutical genocide.

Warm weather has existed since the beginning of time. Not only that, but the world appears to be in a cooling phase right now rather than a warming one, so the “extreme heat” excuse is not all that compelling.

According to the climate-pushing media, extreme heat is an “unacknowledged disaster,” causing more deaths each year in the U.S. than any other weather-related event. Is this actually true, though?

Their proposed solution is to create new “heat officer” positions to patrol the streets in search of heart-destroying hot weather. These heat officers will then be tasked with communicating to the public the alleged risks involved with exposing oneself to hot days

[…]

Via https://dreddymd.com/2023/11/19/media-blames-heart-attacks-strokes-climate-change/

Five Countries Ask ICC to Probe War Crimes in Gaza

ICC
GAZA, (PIC)

Palestinian Information Center
The International Criminal Court (ICC) announced that it received referrals from five states seeking an investigation into Israeli war crimes in Gaza.

ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan disclosed that South Africa, Bangladesh, Bolivia, Comoros, and Djibouti submitted the referrals.

Khan confirmed in a statement that the ICC is already investigating the situation in Gaza.

“In accordance with the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, a State Party may refer to the Prosecutor a situation in which one or more crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court appear to have been committed requesting the Prosecutor to investigate the situation for the purpose of determining whether one or more specific persons should be charged with the commission of such crimes,” he said.

Khan mentioned the establishment of a specialized team upon assuming his term in June 2021, aimed at advancing the investigation in Palestine.

The prosecutor emphasized that the team will probe crimes suspected to be committed during the Israeli aggression on Gaza.

South Africa declared that it had submitted the referral request with “other countries that share the same concerns”, demanding that the International Criminal Court would urgently pay “attention to the seriousness of the current situation.”

The South African Ministry of Foreign Affairs stressed in a statement that Pretoria “urges other signatory states to the Rome Statute to join this referral request, or to submit their referral requests independently.”

The ICC opened an investigation in 2021 into war crimes suspected to be committed by the Israeli occupation forces in Palestine.

Since October 7, Israel has been waging a bloody aggression on the Gaza Strip, resulting in the martyrdom of more than 12,000 Palestinian civilians, most of whom are children and women.

Germany’s Energy Woes Spark Deindustrialization on a Considerable Scale

Bundestag elections - Sputnik International, 1920, 15.11.2023

By Chimausem Nwosu
Germany’s automotive, mechanical engineering, and industrial goods companies are prioritizing moving less complex processes overseas to secure their business futures. Berlin’s chances of reversing such a trend are in doubt, as companies have expressed disappointment in the current government’s actions to forestall their departure.

Consultancy firm Deloitte reports that two out of three German companies have partially relocated their operations abroad due to ongoing energy issues in Germany.

Previous reports indicated that nearly half of the country’s small-to-midsized companies were considering moving abroad or ceasing operations. According to Deloitte, 67 percent of German companies have moved some operations abroad, and every third industrial company plans to relocate high-quality areas such as production and preassembly.

Investments in infrastructure, digitalization, and cost-effective energy pricing are essential for securing business locations. The situation is particularly acute in Germany’s mechanical engineering, industrial goods, and automotive sectors, where 69 percent of companies report moderate to large-scale relocation.

Currently, companies are primarily moving less complex aspects like component manufacturing abroad. Florian Ploner, a partner at Deloitte and industry sector expert, remarked, “Deindustrialization is already taking place on a considerable scale here. If the general conditions remain the same, it is very likely that more companies will follow and more and more important parts of the value creation will migrate.”

When considering relocation, one-third of respondents focus on high-value areas like general production (33 percent) and preassembly (34 percent). Currently, companies are relocating evenly across the EU, Asia, and the US, with only 10 percent of companies planning to move to other Asian countries and eight percent considering returning to Europe from Asia.

Germany’s prospects for reversing this trend seem slim. Companies suggest that increased subsidies and reduced bureaucracy might encourage them to stay, but they have little faith in the current government’s actions to prevent their departure. While this trend concerns Berlin, it offers some positives for Brussels, as companies plan to move their manufacturing processes within the European Union.

From the companies’ perspective, reducing bureaucracy and ensuring competitive energy prices are practical measures to enhance location attractiveness, with 69 percent in favor. In contrast, state support for key technologies (45 percent) or simplified immigration of qualified specialists (43 percent) are less critical.

Dr. Jurgen Sandau, a Deloitte partner and supply chain expert, notes that, “The pressure on companies is enormous… Nevertheless, a hasty move rarely makes sense. Companies in this country are well advised to make their capacities flexible over the next five years with the help of platforms and networks. After all, factors such as legal certainty and stability in Germany as a business location are essential for entrepreneurial success.”

Companies not currently relocating are focusing on alternative suppliers and expanding multisourcing. They rely on comprehensive supplier management, collaboration, cross-supply chain data exchange, and risk analyses.

Meanwhile, it should be recalled that the government led by Olaf Scholz, in coordination with the EU and the US, has imposed sanctions on Russia since 2022 due to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. This action prompted the German government to cease purchasing Russian energy, which had been the bedrock of its industrial boom. The sanctions also exacerbated the fuel crisis worldwide, with Europe becoming its primary victim.

The situation further deteriorated after the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipeline system, built to provide gas from Russia to Europe, allowing German industry to use cheap energy.

In addition, the future of European industrial companies is even more bleak considering the US course towards protectionism. The US Inflation Reduction Act, which provides massive subsidies to US businesses in a bid to concentrate manufacturing sites in North America, caused major concerns in the EU, with French President Emmanuel Macron saying it may lead to the deindustrialization of Europe.

[…]

Via https://sputnikglobe.com/20231115/germanys-energy-woes-spark-deindustralization-on-considerable-scale-1114980581.html

The Archeology of Lost Etruscan Cities

Episode 2 The Lost Cities of Tuscany

The Mysterious Etruscans

Dr Steven L Tuck (2016)

Film Review

Archeological investigation of the lost Etruscan cities of Tuscany* is extremely difficult because they were all overbuilt by Rome. However Rome’s preservation of the original orthogonal layout of the 12 cities of the Etrurian league is helpful in trying to reconstruct them. Etruscan burial practices, with many tombs incorporating exquisite sculptures and intricate and colorful frescoes is also extremely helpful in reconstructing their lifestyle and culture.

The Etruscan built all their cities on hilltops to make them easier to defend. The Romans rebuilt all of them them on their original hilltops, except for Florence. The Romans moved it into an adjacent value once they they no longer needed to defend it militarily.

Each of the Etruscan cities was also located near good grazing, agriculture, timber, mines, claybeds and quarries.

The Etruscans were extremely religious and engaged in religious rituals as they laid out their cities. Some of these ceremonies involved sacrifice of children with epilepsy and other conditions sacred to the gods. Up until 500 BC, the Etruscans were ruled by kings who lived in aristocratic complexe.

One difference between the Etruscans and all other Mediterranean cultures (except for Sparta) was that they didn’t bury their dead extramurally (outside city walls). Instead they created a necropolis (city of the dead) for them within their city walls.

These complex necropoleis, which replicated the cities the deceased had previously inhabited, reveals that typical Etruscan homes consisted of square rooms surrounding an atrium with a pool of water. In addition to copying their style of architectural design, their Roman neighbors (who brought the Etruscans under Roman control in 294 BC) alo also adopted Etruscan-style terra cotta roofs with terra cotta roof ornaments. Etruscan tombs also replicate 6th century BC Etruscan horse races and banqueting scenes, other cultural traditions subsequently adopted by the Romans.

Pompei (destroyed by a volcano in 79 AD) was a famous Etruscan city built around 600 BC a part of a competition between the Greeks and the Etruscans to lay claim to the e rich agricultural land the rich agricultural land of Campania.

Despite their longstanding economic competition, the Etruscans adopted the Greek sun god Apollo, later adopted by the Romans. According to Tuck, they also invented the arch, first used in the construction of drainage canals.

Protomes (busts of famous figures carved on the keystone) were also an Etruscan invention.

The Romans also adopted the Etruscan alphabet (which also became a model for Norse runes).


*The name “Tuscany” is believed to be derived from an ancient name for the Etruscan people.

Film can be viewed free with a library card on Kanopy.

https://www.kanopy.com/en/pukeariki/watch/video/239710/239611

Is the WHO planning to unleash climate lockdowns as the next “pandemic?”

Is the WHO planning to unleash climate lockdowns as the next “pandemic?”
Dr Eddy Betterman

Now that the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) scamdemic is over, the World Health Organization (WHO) is busy plotting its next tyrannical scheme in the form of another round of lockdowns, this time to stop “climate change.”

Newly proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHRs) and the so-called Pandemic Treaty both incorporate what is known as the “One Health” approach. The One Health scheme will grant the WHO absolute “power” to initiate “climate lockdowns” at such a time that “global warming” is determined to be too much of a threat to ignore.

“While vague and confusing, the language of the One Health scam is a tool to create networks and combine efforts toward centralizing power and control, which is always the goal of all masters everywhere,” reported Mac Slavo in the Discern Report.

“Once that central power has been achieved then similar measures that were imposed in response to the COVID plandemic can be used for climate change, loss of biodiversity, human diseases, vector-borne diseases, and much more.”

The next global lockdown will be the lockdown of all lockdowns

The next round of lockdowns to be overseen by the WHO will be much worse than the covid lockdowns. WHO head Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus will be able to wield unrestrained authoritarian tyranny on everyone all around the globe, forcing people to stay inside and “stay safe” indefinitely.

With the help of artificial intelligence (AI), the powers that be will be able to maintain an all-seeing eye on everyone at all times – you didn’t really think those AI brain implants were actually about “saving lives” like Elon Musk claims, did you?

Bill Gates and his Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation are the biggest funders of the WHO, driving the organization’s tyrannical policies. Billy Boy just cannot wait until the next fake “pandemic” is launched, plunging the entire world right back into hell – a much worse hell than covid, by the way.

Covid was just the test run for what the WHO is planning for next time. The World Economic Forum (WEF), run by Klaus Schwab, is also involved with spearheading the scheme, which the Daily Exposé describes as follows:

“WHO’s ‘Pandemic Treaty’ will not only be concerned with pandemics. It introduces globally the ‘One Health’ ideology. The concept recognizes the interdependence of human and animal health and the connection with the environment. Through this One Health agenda, WHO will have the power to make decisions in matters relating to the environment (including greenhouse gas emissions, pollution, and deforestation), animal health (e.g., livestock), and human health (including vaccinations, social determinants, and population movement). With these extended powers, WHO could readily declare a climate or environmental emergency and enforce lockdowns.”

The excuse for all this tyranny is that it must happen in order to provide a “ray of hope for addressing our global challenges.” In other words, the planet will die, we are told, unless all humans besides the “elite” are locked down and subjected to depopulation schemes.

In order to address the 14 “global challenges” that the WHO has identified – these include food, water, safety, security, soil health, and “comparative biology” – the powers that be must seize control over everything, including not just “people” but also “animals,” plants, waterways, and entire ecosystems.

To stop this nightmare from coming to fruition, a critical mass of humanity would have to first realize what is happening and agree to systematically resist. This includes the “enforcers,” i.e., law enforcement, coming to the realization that they are working on behalf of evil, prompting them to switch sides and fight for humanity instead.

[…]

Via https://dreddymd.com/2023/11/18/who-planning-unleash-climate-lockdowns-next-pandemic/

Pfizer Hid Preterm Birth Risk from Pregnant Women in RSV Vaccine Trial

According to an investigation by The BMJ, when GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals halted its RSV vaccine trial over preterm birth risks, Pfizer continued its similar trial while omitting these risks from consent forms. Experts criticized Pfizer’s lack of transparency as an ethical violation compromising informed consent.

Even though Pfizer knew about the GSK trial and safety signal, it continued enrolling thousands of unsuspecting pregnant women without disclosing the preterm birth risk in its consent forms, according to an investigation by The BMJ.

To many healthcare advocates and experts, Pfizer’s omission represents an egregious violation of informed consent and a disregard for the autonomy of pregnant women participating in clinical research.

“Any failure to provide new and potentially important safety information data to trial participants is ethically problematic,” Dr. Charles Weijer, bioethics professor at Western University in London, Ontario, Canada, told The BMJ.

Children’s Health Defense CEO Mary Holland told The Defender:

“I am horrified that it’s even a question whether Pfizer should have told pregnant women that a previous clinical trial was halted because the RSV vaccine caused preterm birth. Of course it should have told them.

“The standard must be, ‘What would a reasonable pregnant woman want to know about this product?’ And any reasonable pregnant woman would want to know if it causes preterm birth. This cavalier attitude towards the truth and human life is alarming.”

After the safety signals emerged in GSK’s study, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) took no action to halt enrollment or to pause or restrict Pfizer’s ongoing maternal RSV vaccine trial.

‘Statistically significant’ shouldn’t form sole basis of Pfizer’s decision

Months after GSK’s revelation of the concerning safety signal, Pfizer also began detecting a numerical imbalance in preterm births in its own trial data but said the data were not statistically significant.

According to The BMJ, Pfizer was tracking preterm births as an “adverse event of special interest” in its trial. But the company did not disclose this on consent forms given to thousands of pregnant trial participants across 18 countries.

“Once the results of the GSK trial on premature births became public, RSV vaccine studies in pregnant women should have been updated to include this possible preterm risk,” said Klaus Überla, Ph.D., chair of Clinical and Molecular Virology at the University Hospital Erlangen, in The BMJ report.

However, regulators took little action to encourage disclosure. The FDA ultimately limited approval of Pfizer’s vaccine to late pregnancy — specifically, for administration between 32-36 weeks only — due to preterm concerns. But the agency did nothing to restrict trial enrollment or require risk disclosure after the GSK findings emerged.

Some defend Pfizer’s lack of disclosure to trial participants by arguing the preterm risk was inconclusive. Dr. Joop van Gerven, an ethics chair in the Netherlands, told The BMJ that informing women “would have caused too much uncertainty.”

However, others challenged this notion. “The renewal of informed consent is a must,” Rose Bernabe, Ph.D., told The BMJ.

Bernabe, a professor of medical research ethics at the University of South-Eastern Norway, referenced guidelines from the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, which state: “Researchers must renew the informed consent … if new information becomes available that could affect the willingness of participants to continue.”

Weijer told The BMJ:

“For Pfizer, the DSMB [Data Safety and Monitoring Board] should have regularly assessed the benefit-harm balance, both on the data in the trial and whether the GSK results affected that balance. They should not base their decision simply on whether a particular result is ‘statistically significant.’ These are difficult decisions, and it is why DSMBs are independent of the company.”

Justine Tanguay, CHD lawyer and director of campaign research for Reform Pharma, told The Defender:

“It’s no surprise that regulatory agencies such as the FDA are prioritizing Big Pharma’s profit over the health interests of its pregnant trial participants when you pull back the curtain and expose the revolving door between government’s top federal employees and key executives for Big Pharma — the industry that FDA is supposed to be regulating.

“In fact, the revolving door has become so commonplace that it is hard to decipher the tangled mess between the private sector and governmental agencies.

“For instance, a former deputy director at the FDA who ran the Office of Vaccines Research and Review and pushed for the licensure of COVID-19 vaccines now works for Moderna as the head of the Infectious Diseases Early Clinical Development and Translational Medicine Program.

“For the sake of public health, such egregious conflict of interests must end.”

‘I think it needs to be addressed’

According to The BMJ investigation, in February 2022, GSK reported that a safety signal had emerged in its maternal RSV vaccine trial, indicating a concerning imbalance in preterm births between the vaccine and placebo groups.

Specifically, GSK observed that 6.81% of births in the vaccine arm were preterm, compared to just 4.95% of births in the placebo arm. Additionally, neonatal deaths were 0.37% in the vaccine group versus 0.17% in the placebo group.

This unexpected safety signal prompted GSK to immediately halt its Phase 3 trial and discontinue the development of its vaccine.

However, Pfizer’s trial of a similar maternal RSV vaccine continued enrolling participants.

Both companies were developing versions of an RSV F protein vaccine that works by targeting the RSV fusion protein to generate antibodies that can neutralize the virus. The F protein is essential for viral entry and its structure is highly consistent across different strains of RSV.

In Pfizer’s Phase 3 data, 5.7% of births in the vaccine arm were preterm compared to just 4.7% in placebo. Ten stillbirths occurred in the vaccine group versus eight in the placebo group. Neonatal deaths in the placebo group (.3%) exceeded those in the vaccine group (.1%). One vaccine recipient died from postpartum hemorrhage and hypovolemic shock.

Pfizer reported the increase in preterm births was most pronounced in trial participants from upper-middle-income countries, notably South Africa, according to the May 18 meeting of the FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC).

While Pfizer claimed these numbers were not statistically significant, experts noted this numerical increase in preterm births mirrored the safety signal in the halted GSK trial, raising further questions about the risks of maternal RSV vaccination.

VRBPAC Chairwoman Hana El Sahly, during the May meeting, characterized the signal of increased preterm births during Pfizer’s Phase 2 and 3 trials as “significant” and said it was “probably” reason enough to pause the trial. She said that “failing to design the Pfizer Phase 3 study to deliver that clarity … is a big missed opportunity.”

Four of the 14 VRBPAC members were sufficiently concerned that they voted against finding the drug safe for pregnant women. Notably, one of the dissenting votes came from Dr. Paul Offit, a pediatrician at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, who said, “If GSK truly abandons a program on a similar, almost identical vaccine, that is going to hang over [Pfizer’s] program. I think it needs to be addressed.”

Vaccine efficacy inconclusive, limited, with ‘no direct benefit to the mothers’

Peter McCullough, M.D., MPH, in an April 21 Substack post, raised a different point about the viability of the Pfizer vaccine, arguing Pfizer’s study design relied on an outcome that occurred too rarely to reliably measure efficacy.

Basing results on fewer than 2% of babies getting sick left the findings “a statistical blur,” he said — meaning the findings on whether the vaccine provided meaningful protection were inconclusive.

“Pfizer has aggressively advanced RCTs [randomized control trials] into the pregnant population with no assurances on long-term outcomes,” McCullough added, and with “no direct benefit to the mothers.”

In the May VRBPAC meeting, it was further noted that while the incidence of RSV for babies was lower in the vaccine group up to 6 months of age, during the 181- to 360-day period after birth, babies in both groups contracted RSV at similar rates.

After the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended the vaccine for pregnant women in September, McCullough told The Defender, “Vaccination of the mother for passive immunization of the infant is an unnecessary and risky strategy that will undoubtedly lead to fetal loss or premature deliveries when deployed on a large scale.”

This controversy comes at a time when the CDC is reporting the largest rise in infant mortality in 20 years, and amidst concerns that doctors are being paid to push vaccines on pregnant women.

Warnings fell on deaf ears

The recent BMJ investigation was not its first warning about the RSV trials. On May 10, following Pfizer’s publication of its Phase 3 trials data, The BMJ warned that Pfizer’s safety signals were similar enough to GSK’s to warrant further analysis.

Überla told The BMJ, “My interpretation of all these data is that there may be a safety signal for preterm births that should be followed up.”

A scientist at the National Institutes of Health who wished to remain anonymous told The BMJ the Pfizer data should be analyzed using more sensitive measures such as average birth weight and subgroup analyses to determine the validity of the safety signal.

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pregnant-women-pfizer-rsv-vaccine-preterm-birth-risk/