Unknown's avatar

About stuartbramhall

Retired child and adolescent psychiatrist and American expatriate in New Zealand. In 2002, I made the difficult decision to close my 25-year Seattle practice after 15 years of covert FBI harassment. I describe the unrelenting phone harassment, illegal break-ins and six attempts on my life in my 2010 book The Most Revolutionary Act: Memoir of an American Refugee.

Dean Henderson: Dump Israel and Its Crown Sponsors

Dean Henderson

The most important change the United States needs to make is our relationship with Israel and its Arab neighbors. For far too long Israel and its City of London masters have dictated US foreign policy in the Middle East and elsewhere.

This is because, as I outline in my book Big Oil & Their Bankers…, Israel is not so much a “Jewish homeland” as it is a creation of the Rothschild central banking monopoly which controls our Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, Royal Dutch Shell and scores of other financial and industrial behemoths.

Israel serves as military gendarme to this inbred monopoly by keeping the Arab world stirred up and at war with itself. That is why the Israeli Mossad finances Islamic extremists in every corner of the globe. The Rothschilds know that if they can keep the Arabs divided amongst themselves and hated by the Evangelical Christian movement in the West, which is also an unwitting tool of the Mossad, then they can maintain their monopoly over Middle East oil, which is the lifeblood of the global financial system.

American Evangelicals have been hoodwinked into an unwavering support of Israel, while AIPAC (American Israeli Political Action Committee) makes sure that politicians who don’t show unwavering support for Israel have no chance of being elected. If you criticize Israel you soon become a target for B’Nai Brith and the Anti-Defamation League who will claim wrongly that you are an anti-Semite. Of course you can criticize the Arabs all day long and no such clamor will occur, despite the fact that any ethnographer will tell you that the Arab people are also Semites.

What fuels these lies is the massive money-printing monopoly that is our Federal Reserve, a monopoly which is largely owned by the Rothschilds and their interbred kissing cousins the Warburgs, Goldman Sachs, Kuhn Loebs, et al. These people disdain the average Jewish person in the same way they despise average Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus and animists.

They make up stories like The DaVinci Code to justify their bloodline rule and to convince us that groveling at their feet is our destiny. It is the same Divine Right of a Kings philosophy which has existed on this planet for the past 2000 years, enslaving all of us while making a handful of interbreeding knuckleheads masters of the universe.

Our founding fathers were well aware of this family banking monopoly. The writings of Jefferson, Madison and Adams in particular are full of warnings about these money changers and the network of secret societies (Freemasons, Illuminati, etc.) they have spawned to keep their money printing game out of public view. Unfortunately this history has been suppressed by the corporate media, which is owned by these same families.

Americans of all political stripes, but particularly progressives have been brainwashed into the idea that any talk of conspiracy must be instantly discredited. Why do you suppose this is?

Because if one does enough research, as William Burroughs said, “a man who is paranoid is one who knows a little something”.

Conspiracy theories are one thing. Then there are conspiracy facts. When I was completing my Master’s thesis on the Middle East oil game in 1991, I came across SEC documents which showed that the Rockefeller family still owned controlling stock in Exxon, Mobil, Chevron and other oil companies. Yet my progressive PhD thesis advisor, a good friend of mine, suggested that we should leave this information out of the final paper because these facts indicated a conspiracy. I refused to do so.

It is not easy to spend your life as a progressive political activist. It is yet more difficult when people who share that point of view constantly abandon and discredit you publicly for stumbling upon uncomfortable truths which they do not have the courage to investigate for themselves. We are to think within certain parameters which have been laid out for us by the Money Power. Anyone who thinks outside these parameters is targeted for marginalization by a deputized Thought Police which 95% of Americans have become.

The same is true of our belief systems. The New Age spirituality trap that so many progressives have fallen for is rife with the same pyramid top-down structures that exist in a right-wing Evangelical church. But if you reject both dualities and tell them you talk to your ancestors, the animals and the trees; you are a nutter, despite the fact that this is what indigenous people have done for tens of thousands of sustainable and harmonious years.

Political and spiritual awakening are the same thing. All religious traditions and Nature itself teach the same basic tenets of Love, Compassion and Justice. Yet the fundamentalist movements now growing inside Judaism, Islam, Christianity, and the New Age alike move people away from these simple truths into a realm of exclusivity, arrogance and intolerance.

We need to break down these false spiritual and political barriers. We must focus on uniting to free ourselves from the Money Power, which fans the flames of fear, extremism and division. We should make it a priority issue to declare our independence from the Federal Reserve by nationalizing it. And we should pursue a foreign policy which is in the interest, not of the Rothschilds, the British Empire or their Israeli surrogate, but of the United States of America.

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/dump-israel-crown-sponsors/5896188

Lavrov: US trade deal will fuel EU’s deindustrialization

US trade deal will fuel EU’s ‘deindustrialization’ – Lavrov

RT

The agreement has dealt a “very hard blow” to a number of business sectors in the bloc, the Russian foreign minister has said

The new US-EU trade agreement threatens to accelerate “deindustrialization” in Europe by redirecting investment to the US and increasing the bloc’s dependency on American energy exports, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has said.

On Sunday, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and US President Donald Trump finalized a controversial deal that allowed the EU and US to avert a full-scale trade war.

Under the deal, the US has reduced its proposed 30% tariffs to a flat 15% on most European exports. The EU has committed to purchasing $750 billion worth of US energy, primarily liquefied natural gas and nuclear fuel, and agreed to invest around $600 billion into US industries. The bloc has also undertaken to increase imports of US-made weapons.

Speaking at the ‘Territory of Meanings’ forum on Monday, Lavrov described the arrangement as “clearly leading to further deindustrialization of Europe and capital flight.” He added that rising energy prices and investment outflows will strike a “very hard blow” to European industrial and agricultural sectors.

According to Lavrov, von der Leyen was apparently “boasting” about the EU’s willingness to carry additional costs. “People like Ursula von der Leyen literally take pride in this path: yes, we will be forced to spend more money, yes, we will probably have fewer resources to address social problems, but we are obliged to defeat Russia.”

He stressed that the trade deal is “obviously damaging for the Old Continent – it doesn’t even need to be analyzed.”

Lavrov’s stance was echoed by several EU politicians and the business community. Marine Le Pen, a key figure in France’s right-wing National Rally party, denounced the agreement as a “political, economic, and moral fiasco” detrimental to the EU’s sovereignty. French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou concurred, calling it a “dark day” for the EU.

German business leaders also voiced alarm. Wolfgang Niedermark, a member of the executive board of the Federation of German Industries (BDI), said the EU had sent a “fatal signal” by accepting high tariffs. “Even a tariff rate of 15% will have immense negative effects on the export-oriented German industry,” he warned.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/russia/622090-us-eu-trade-deal-deindustrialization/

Forget Wall Street – Bitcoin’s real test is happening in Kenya

Forget Wall Street. Bitcoin’s real test is happening here

By Jackson Okata

Young Kenyans in urban centers are rapidly embracing Bitcoin as a form of payment

Kenya is touted as Africa’s hub for technology and innovation. Across the East African nation, mobile money has become the most common and widely used form of payment and banking, both in the formal and informal sectors of the economy. But even as mobile money dominates Kenya’s economy, a new wave of cryptocurrency payment is taking root in urban areas across the country.

A 2022 UN report listed Kenya as the largest market of crypto users in Africa, with four million crypto owners. Kenya’s crypto sector is estimated to register 4% growth by the end of 2025.

’It saves me time and money’

Since 2022, Brian Omondi has operated an electronics and gaming shop in Kibera, Kenya’s largest urban slum, 10km south of the Capital, Nairobi. The 26-year-old business management graduate has embraced Bitcoin as a form of payment, which he says is “more effective.”

“I have clients from across the country, and online marketing is central to my business. Bitcoin payments are fast and secure because once the funds are in my wallet, they can’t be reversed, unlike mobile money,” Omondi told RT.

He says most of his customers are tech-savvy young Kenyans and college students who are increasingly turning to cryptocurrency.

“With Bitcoin, there’s no need to visit an agent to deposit or withdraw money. All I need is a smartphone and internet access. There is no bureaucracy, no transaction charges,” he said.

Omondi, who gets his electronics supplies from China, says using Bitcoin has also made it easier to restock his shop by transacting directly with suppliers who accept cryptocurrency.

“With Bitcoin, I can place orders and make payments instantly, bypassing currency conversions or international banking procedures,” he explains. “It saves me time and money, and my goods arrive faster.”

Young Kenyans in urban centers are rapidly embracing Bitcoin as a form of payment, with many turning to the cryptocurrency as a flexible, borderless alternative amid limited access to traditional banking due to a lack of formal employment. Increased Bitcoin usage is also driven by the digital lifestyles of Kenyan youth, widespread smartphone usage, and enhanced internet connectivity.

’Bitcoin guarantees financial freedom to users’

In 2022, AfriBit Africa, a Kenyan fintech company, introduced the use of Bitcoin in Kibera. Ronnie Mdawida, AfriBit Africa co-founder, told RT that “Bitcoin guarantees financial freedom to users since it does not require the same documentation as traditional banking.”

Small-scale traders and motorcycle taxi riders are among those accepting bitcoin payments in Kenyan towns. AfriBit Africa claims to have invested approximately $10,000 worth of bitcoin in Kibera since 2022.

Mohammed Rajab, a taxi operator in the tourist city of Mombasa, says he began accepting Bitcoin in 2023 because many of his foreign clients prefer to pay using cryptocurrency.

“Bitcoin is safe because I own and control my funds without relying on a third party,” Rajab told RT.

Rajab says most of his foreign clients find it easier to pay in crypto rather than converting currency or using cards.

“Bitcoin comes with the flexibility of saving and converting when rates are favorable,” he said.

With the rise of remote freelance work, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have become essential for many young Kenyans earning a living through digital platforms.

Sarah Thuo, based in Kisumu City, Western Kenya, has been a content writer for the past six years and has been accustomed to crypto payments.

“All my clients are from the international market, and having a Bitcoin wallet enables faster payments, unlike bank transfers, which are prone to delays and restrictions,” she told RT. For Sarah, Bitcoin also shields her earnings from currency fluctuations and high bank transfer fees.

Flip side of the Bitcoin

In 2024, the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) collected approximately $77.3 million (Ksh 10 billion) from virtual asset service providers (VASPs).

In 2023, under the Finance Act 2023, the Kenyan government introduced the Digital Assets Tax (DAT). Under the provision, crypto incomes are taxed. The law introduced a 3% tax on the transfer or exchange of digital assets.

But experts warn that even as Bitcoin use gains momentum across Kenya, legal loopholes could expose many to the risk of fraud.

Ali Hussein Kassim, chair of the FinTech Alliance in Kenya, told RT that many Kenyans are oblivious of the risks associated with bitcoin.

“The investors are more interested in making profits and do not educate the users about the potential risks of bitcoin; no one takes to evaluate the risks involved,” Kassim warns.

Kassim notes that the population being exposed to cryptocurrency is vulnerable.  According to him, Bitcoin lacks the same protections as other financial services due to a lack of strong regulations.

However, Mdawida told RT that, to cushion Kenyans against crypto risks, they have invested in financial literacy training and crypto courses for those using Bitcoin.

Cases of cryptocurrency-related fraud have previously been reported in Kenya. In February 2025, two Kenyans were arrested for defrauding a Chinese national in a crypto scam.

Will fines work?

In January 2025, the IMF, in a Technical Assistance Report for Kenya has called for the enhancement of the country’s safety and regulation of the crypto sector.

According to the IMF report, Kenya currently lacks a clear regulatory framework to oversee crypto-related activities. This loophole, the IMF said, has exposed cryptocurrencies to unlawful purposes.

To address the challenges and guard cryptocurrencies against misuse, the IMF advised Kenya to implement robust anti-money laundering laws and counter-terrorism financing measures.

In 2022, the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) explored the possibility of introducing a digital shilling dubbed the Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), but the plan was abandoned due to the clear effectiveness of the already existing Kenya’s leading mobile money infrastructure, M-Pesa.

Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are not illegal in Kenya, and the law allows owning and trading of crypto. They are, however, not recognized as legal tender, nor accepted for official transactions like paying taxes, bank transactions or paying fees charged for government services.

The growing adoption of crypto, especially among the young and tech-savvy population, has prompted the government to draft legislation that aims to regulate digital asset services and related activities.

Kenya’s Finance Ministry introduced the Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASP) Bill, 2025, which outlines the licensing requirements for crypto service providers.

The proposed law, which is currently before parliament, requires virtual asset service providers to register as formal businesses and obtain a government-issued license.

The law proposes fines of up to KES 20 million ($150,000) for companies and KES 10 million and/or up to ten years in prison for individuals found in violation of the regulations.

To enhance consumer protection and financial integrity, the law proposes fines of up to KES 30 million or imprisonment for up to a decade for offences related to scams, pump-and-dump schemes, or market manipulation.

At the same time, the Kenyan government also requires crypto companies to implement strict Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) policies to enhance accountability and combat financial crime.

And just like banks and traditional financial institutions, crypto companies are required to report any suspicious activities to the Financial Reporting Centre (FRC).

Kassim argues, however, that the global nature of cryptocurrency makes it difficult for Kenya to regulate users who access international platforms outside its jurisdiction.

“Most cases of the fraud being reported have a foreign link, and many of those defrauded never recover their money,” he told RT.

Just as with the AI, Kenya cannot run away from the cryptocurrency reality and all it needs are strong and implementable policies that will cushion the public from exploitation. “The world is headed the cryptocurrency way and Kenya must not be left out. We must however get it right even as we join the bandwagon,” Kassim concluded.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/africa/622084-kenyas-blockchain-economy-is-booming/

What Happens When Big Pharma Pulls the Plug?

Opinion | Big Pharma and the Covid Vaccines - The New York Times
Dr. Joseph Mercola

Big Pharma Isn’t in the Business of Saving Lives

Story at-a-glance

  • Big Pharma prioritizes financial gain over saving lives, discontinuing unprofitable medicines even when patients desperately need them, causing preventable deaths worldwide
  • Pharmaceutical companies artificially create scarcity by withdrawing established medicines, then reintroducing them at higher prices to maximize profits and control markets
  • Despite regulations, pharmaceutical companies consistently overpower governments in negotiations, setting arbitrary prices that citizens and health care systems cannot afford or challenge
  • Critical medications for cancer, allergies, and rare diseases become unavailable due to supply manipulation, forcing doctors to ration treatments using wartime triage methods
  • To avoid pharmaceutical dependency, focus on optimizing natural health through avoiding processed oils, improving gut health, reducing toxin exposure, and enhancing detoxification

Medicine is supposed to save lives, but this isn’t even the focus of Big Pharma. Instead, it’s in the business of making money. This is what the documentary “Big Pharma — How Profits Kill Patients” by ENDEVR shows.1

One of the primary themes highlighted in this film is the shortage of medications worldwide. According to the narrator, “Today, there are stock shortages of medicine even in rich countries.” As seen in the COVID-19 pandemic, hospitals experienced shortages in medicine, equipment, and other items medical professionals need to treat patients.

Even worse, this is still happening today — Patients are dying because they’re not getting the medicine they need. The reason? Big Pharma discontinued their production because they’re “unprofitable.”

What Happens When a Drug Stops Making Money?

As noted by the narrator, “health is an international business.” Hospitals around the world rely on medical devices and medicines to help treat patients. However, supply issues are now a prominent problem.

Medicines are now getting harder to come by — Yannis Natsis, a policy manager at European Public Health Alliance, said that despite the massive profits of Big Pharma, shortages are occurring:

“In the past, it was only a problem that had to do with southern Europe or Eastern Europe and now, it touches upon even the richest and wealthiest EU member states in the west. And this is why this issue has gained a bit more prominence.”

Big Pharma always wins — While being bound by laws, drug manufacturers always seem to have an upper hand on governments and doctors because they’re too important. As one expert noted, “In the arm wrestling between the pharmaceutical industry and governments, the pharmaceutical industry invariably wins.”

Priorities are always on the moneymakers — In Mexico, 1,600 have died due to medicine shortages. Yet, Viagra is always available, demonstrating how Big Pharma values its different consumer groups.

Digging deeper into the supply issue — Globalization has allowed health institutions to purchase medicines from around the world, but this is causing pressure among buyers when faced with shortages.

[…]

The Economics Behind Medicines

Competition within Big Pharma is fierce. Whenever a new drug is produced, governments allow the manufacturer special privileges to maintain profitability.

Patents are held for a long time — The documentary explains how manufacturers control the prices once a new drug enters the market:

“The profitability of a drug evolves with time. At the beginning, the medication is protected by a patent. A high price is accorded to the maker who has the monopoly on sales for 10 to 20 years. This is the most profitable period when the price and volume of sales are at their highest. When the patent expires, the drug can be copied in generic form. It therefore becomes less profitable due to the reduction in price and the competition.”

Big Pharma manipulates the market — Despite knowing the importance of certain medicines, Big Pharma willingly removes them to create scarcity. Natsis explains:

“We see a lot of products, a lot of medicines, which have been widely used. And long-established medicines being withdrawn from the market only to be reintroduced to the market with higher prices, for instance. Or, there is a push to say that ‘if you don’t want to have shortages then you need to pay the highest.'”

Another example of Big Pharma’s lack of cooperation — In another interview, a teenager explains that she has allergies and needs an epinephrine pen to keep the symptoms at bay. However, ALK, the manufacturer that makes them, has discontinued production, despite hundreds of thousands relying on this life-saving drug:

“ALK laboratory produces them for 500,000 clients around the world. But in 2017, it stopped selling auto injectors in Spain. It refused a government-imposed price drop. For patients the product became difficult to obtain.”

Big Pharma doesn’t want to be controlled — While manufacturers set the price, governments also do their best to lower it to ensure all citizens have immediate access. However, as the vice president for the epinephrine manufacturer justifies:

“When we launched the product, it was €34 back in 2011 in Spain. Then, there was a price decrease or a few, but at least it ended on €27. And then there was the last imposed price decrease in 2018, getting it down to less than €24. That was the last draw for me.

The €24 would be, by far, the lowest price in Europe, and this comes back to my point that in essence, you could say the one who pays the lowest price, eventually, it will be the price for everyone. This would kill then the entire business force. And this was why I said, ‘Sorry, dear Spanish government. We cannot honor this anymore. It’s impossible for us the price was already too low.’ We need to say, ‘no thank you.'”

What Happens When Cancer Patients Can’t Get Treatment?

Bladder cancer affects tens of thousands of people worldwide, and they rely on certain medications to maintain their condition. One example is BCG-Medac. In France, however, it’s been in shortage for several years because, as you can guess, it’s not as profitable as other medicines.

Cancer medication supply is being controlled — BCG-Medac “is experiencing severe supply difficulties,” explains a hospital pharmacist interviewed in the documentary.

A quota system develops — According to the documentary, supply shortages give rise to a medical quota system. Here, medicines in short supply are only given to priority patients, making them unavailable to people who are also just as deserving in receiving treatment.

Other labs are not interested in saving lives — A French patient explains that he needs BCG-Medac for his bladder cancer. However, his urologist told him that there are no treatments available:

“Since 2020, only the German laboratory Medac sells this treatment in France but it does not have the capacity to fill hospital demand. And none of the large laboratories are interested in this old medication resulting from a vaccine invented more than a century ago. The famous BCG [vaccine] given to children against tuberculosis.”

Triage is now commonplace — The practice of prioritizing which patients to treat comes from wartime experiences. To distribute BCG-Medac, a French professor was forced to apply a triage scheme:

“It’s always difficult to tell a patient they can’t have access to treatment. But if this has to be the case, it’s better that medical reasons be used to select or — to use a word that mustn’t be abused — sort patients. By which I mean in terms of gravity of the illness.

It was above all to ensure equity of medical access across the country, so that a patient in a remote region wouldn’t have less chance of access to treatment than somebody in a large city. It was also to make sure there was no financial influence, that a wealthy patient would not have more chance of receiving treatment.”

How Are Drug Prices Set?

In an effort to keep medicines in stock, as well as prices down, governments are always meeting with representatives of Big Pharma to find a middle ground. The documentary explains how this process works in France:

A committee is formed — Representatives from the government and drug manufacturers discuss via committees. Philippe Bouyoux, president of the Economic Committee for Health Products, explains that “for every medicine, we examine the proposition made by a laboratory, and the committee reacts accordingly.” Going deeper into this:

“Each week, the committee brings together representatives from the health and finance ministries behind closed doors. This is where the arm wrestling between the state and the laboratories takes place.

For each drug, we look at the medical service which it provides, then we consider it for this particular health objective … It’s quite a challenge to satisfy the expectations and needs of patients without putting in danger the sustainability of the public purse.”

Supply prices and distribution are abused by Big Pharma — The documentary also interviewed a Belgian mother whose child has spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), a rare genetic illness affecting 1 in 10,000 children. However Zolgensma, a gene therapy available for this disease, was priced at a whopping $2.125 million by Novartis — impossible for ordinary citizens.

Furthermore, the gene therapy was only released in the U.S. “In Europe, it was neither reimbursable nor even approved by the European Medicines Agency,” the documentary explains. Fortunately, the mother was able to help her daughter through a fundraising campaign.

Big Pharma will give you the cold shoulder — If you can’t pay the price set by manufacturers, they will ignore you. The mother shares her experience:

“Novartis contacted us saying that they sympathized. That they were deeply touched by our story, but that they couldn’t give us a reduction. In fact, what they said was if you don’t have the $2 million, she can’t have the treatment.”

Prices are pulled out of thin air sometimes — How does a single drug cost millions of dollars? While companies’ base prices on manufacturing costs, certain products are priced arbitrarily. As noted by the documentary:

“Novartis did not calculate the price in terms of production costs, but instead, according to what society is prepared to pay to have access to the treatment.”

Monopolies are hurting citizens — Manufacturers can set high prices for special medications because of its rarity. While problematic, it is still legal, and no one can challenge Big Pharma, as they’re too powerful. If a patient was able to purchase the medication they need, they’re now drowning in medical debt. Wilbert Bannenberg, president of the Pharmaceutical Accountability Foundation, explains:

“Pharmaceutical companies have the right to do this. It isn’t forbidden. They have the monopoly. They ask the price which they consider right, but it’s like throwing a life belt to somebody who’s drowning. Then, when the person asks, ‘How much do I owe you?’ You reply, ‘I saved your life. You’ll live for another 20 years, so that’s 20 times €80,000 which makes €1.6 million.'”

What Happened When Mexico Challenged Big Pharma?

Governments know how strong Big Pharma’s grip on economies, and many are trying to challenge this powerful group. In Mexico, former president Andrés Manuel López Obrador canceled corrupt contracts, closed unsafe plants, and tried to import generics.

A systematic reset is needed — In a press conference, Obrador explains, “The whole system was defective. Production, distribution, and the buying of medicaments. It was just another business. But we are talking about medicaments. And there was so much corruption as well.”

Exposing the drawbacks of corruption — The government of Mexico singled out PiSA Farmaceutica, which is responsible for half of the anticancer drugs sold in the country. Here’s what authorities found afterward:

“The drug agency inspected their factory and realized that it wasn’t up to standard. Bacteria had spread through the laboratory when the production line was halted. What did PiSA do? PiSA met with the directors of the agency and tried to pressure them into production to continue without carrying out improvements.”

Big Pharma isn’t afraid to fight back — When the government of Mexico closed down several factories due to poor conditions, PiSA refused to supply the market. Consequently, this showed how drug manufacturers are able to influence public health simply because they don’t want to be held accountable.

[…]

Via https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2025/07/27/big-pharma-isnt-in-the-business-of-saving-lives.aspx

Will ‘Greater Syria’ and ‘Greater Israel’ Collide or Co-exist under the Al Qaeda Regime?

By Vanessa Beeley

There were no casualties in Israel’s bombing of Damascus and Jolani had advance warning to leave the capitol. 

[…]

Syria is Now the Crossroads for Regional Interests

Part of the alleged security deal between Jolani and Israel includes a Syria, Turkey, and Israel deal to bring water from the Euphrates through Syria to Israel. The problem with this project lies in the competing spheres of influence. Turkey is a NATO member state, and a long-time intelligence, arms, and economic ally of Israel. Baku oil is being supplied to Israel through Turkey, despite the ongoing Zionist genocide in Gaza and expansion of land grab in the West Bank.

Syria is a major area of competition for Israel and Turkey. The Greater Israel project clashes with the neo-Ottoman empire. President Erdogan’s aspirations are to have sole guardianship of Syria post-Assad. Jolani has changed the rules of the game, as he did when he left ISIS to establish Al Qaeda in Syria.

[…]

The US views regional interests through the lens of Israel. Erdogan does not want Syria to normalise with Israel, even though he would not say so publicly. Jolani is clearly edging towards a first phase of normalisation, which is a condition set by Trump for the lifting of sanctions and potentially other ‘under the table’ deals. For Erdogan, normalisation means the Zionisation of Syria and the reduction of his role in the country. It would also mean increased Gulf State influence, which would be a blow to Erdogan, positioning himself as the leader of the Muslim world.

[…]

Local sources in Damascus report that Mossad operatives are regular visitors to the Four Seasons Hotel, along with American, British, and French Intelligence agents. Previously, Turkish intelligence dominated the post-Assad scene in Damascus. However, squeezing Erdogan out of the Syrian picture beyond containment in the north could lead to unintended consequences for Jolani and the Zionist bloc.

[…]

Will the US Supply Weapons to Jolani, and Are the Sanctions Really over?

With the apparent lifting of the terrorist designation for HTS, there is a risk that the US will take advantage of the legitimisation of the HTS regime to supply weapons to help Jolani reinforce Israel’s security in the region.

[…]

According to a reliable source in Syria, there are misconceptions over the lifting of sanctions on Syria. The following points were made:

  • Trump lifted sanctions on 519 individuals and entities. It was a PR stunt. Some sanctions were lifted from former President Bashar Al Assad and some former government officials.
  • The most important and damaging sanctions related to economic support and reconstruction, such as the Caesar Act and designating Syria as a ‘state sponsor of terrorism’, were not removed.
  • These laws require a congressional resolution, and Trump alone does not have the authority to repeal them. Trump could have granted a temporary waiver for six months or a year pending congressional approval, but he did not do this.
  • The decision issued by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to rescind the designation of ‘Jabhat al-Nusra/Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham’ as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) under 8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(6)(A) does not, in any way, remove the entity from the sanctions lists under 50 U.S.C. 1702. So, this is also a PR exercise that largely benefits the US and Israel, not Jolani, as the sanctions threat is still in place.
  • Effectively, HTS is no longer a ‘Foreign Terrorist Organisation’, but it is still a ‘Specially Designated Global Terrorist’. This means members of HTS can visit New York and Paris, but nobody can have financial dealings with them or send them weapons directly, at least not before the Treasury Department issues a decision to lift this status.

[…]

The Importance of Homs, Syria, on the Border with Lebanon

Homs’ strategic importance for all players in Syria is its position in the centre of the country and its role as a major trade and transportation hub, combined with its wealth of hydrocarbon resources. Furthermore, the Governorate of Homs extends from the Iraqi border, through the central Syrian desert, including Palmyra, to the Lebanese border.

The recent focus of Jolani’s militia has been on the ethnic cleansing in the Homs region of all ethnic minorities, the theft of homes, and the settlement of Takfiri elements in the area to alter the demographic entirely. This should be compared to the ongoing brutal Takfiri settlement project in the Syrian coastal region.

The purpose of securing these regions, in particular, is to take full control of the Syrian territory adjacent to the northern and eastern borders with Lebanon. Homs constitutes a key focal point for military concentrations and the launching of missile attacks towards Lebanon. Additionally, it opens the route for ISIS to enter Lebanon from its strongholds in eastern Syria and the central Syrian desert.

Under the Syria-Israel security agreement, Homs would be central to the prevention of Iraqi Resistance forces reaching Lebanon to support Hezbollah.

The Zionisation of Syria — Has the Normalisation Project Failed or Remodelled?

Al Qaeda chief, Jolani, meets President of Azerbaijan, Ilham Aliyev

It remains to be seen how realistic is a public normalisation deal between Syria and Israel. There are hardline factions within HTS that will reject it. This will exacerbate the divisions already forming under Jolani’s command which have been discussed in previous articles. Ordinary Syrians, who grew up with the history of conflict between Syria and Israel, would also reject such a step.

[…]

On 13 July, Israeli media made the claim that Jolani met with Netanyahu’s special envoy in Baku, Azerbaijan. Central to the discussions between Jolani and Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev were solutions for Syria’s ongoing energy crisis, with the majority of oil reserves still occupied by the US and the Kurdish factions in the northeast. Azerbaijan proposed the export of natural gas to Syria via Turkey, which again brings Turkey into the picture, despite the challenges presented by competition with Israel.

However, it is certain, despite denials from various parties, that the main discussions were concerning the Syria-Israel security agreement. It is no coincidence that immediately after Jolani returned from Baku, tensions flared between Druze factions in southern Syria and the Bedouin, Syrian tribal factions linked to HTS and ISIS. This led to fierce and bloody clashes for 48 hours, which are still ongoing with HTS militia trying to gain control of the region and to bring the Druze factions to heel. Some factions within the Druze accepted a ceasefire, while others have continued fighting.

Israel will exploit the confrontation to fulfil the Zionist agenda to gain full access to and control over the Sweida province in southeast Syria, facilitating the David’s Corridor creation along the eastern border with Iraq and Jordan. To this end, a joint statement has been issued by PM Netanyahu and ‘Defence’ Minister Israel Katz pledging IOF military support for the Druze factions. This is a rapidly developing situation, one that I will cover in more detail in a future article.

HTS never had control of southern Syria. Formerly, it was Ahmed Al Awda and the pro-Russian forces of the Eighth Brigade that had maintained control, and were the first to enter Damascus on 8 December 2024. The UAE had attempted to mediate agreements between HTS and Al Awda, but with limited success.

[…]

Via https://beeley.substack.com/p/will-greater-syria-and-greater-israel

Lawyer Suing Gates & Bourla for Covid VAX Injuries Arrested and Imprisoned in Netherlands

The Netherlands goes Full Fascist in a Gestapo-reminiscent late night arrest of attorney Arno van Kessel one month before trial against Gates et al. began.

In a stunning expression of the Globalist-Fascist takeover of the Netherlands, the Netherlands police have arrested Arno van Kessel, the lead attorney suing Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, Mark Rutte et al. for COVID-19 vaccine injuries.

The civil process was scheduled to begin on July 9; Mr. van Kessel was arrested in a Gestapo-reminiscent early morning raid by paramilitary police on June 11, where he was reportedly blindfolded, bound, and taken into detention, where he remains almost two months later.

Readers will note my tardiness in reporting this stunning story. The reason is because both the European and the American press have completely ignored both the civil trial against Gates, Bourla, Rutte et al. and van Kessel’s arrest.

I knew nothing about van Kessel’s arrest until last night, when my co-author, Dr. Peter McCullough, forwarded to me a report by INFOWARS journalist, Adan Salazar. Once again, the so-called “conspiracy theorist” Alex Jones has proven to be one of the first guys to report the shocking reality of what is going on.

Salazar’s report prompted me to do a Google Netherlands search with the key words Arno van Kessel gearresteerd — that is, “Arno van Kessel arrested”—and I got one search result for a June 27 report in an independent online journal called Der Andere Krant (The Other Newspaper). The following is an English translation.

Arno van Kessel will be held in custody for an additional ninety days because the Public Prosecution Service continues to designate him as a “suspect in an investigation into a criminal network,” yet without presenting any evidence. This means the Leeuwarden lawyer will definitely not be present at the public hearing on July 9th in the Leeuwarden District Court, where the first substantive hearing in the internationally high-profile case against, among others, the State of the Netherlands, Mark Rutte, and Bill Gates is scheduled. His partner, Peter Stassen, is on his own, but says he will “appear fully equipped.”

In early June, this newspaper reported that there was finally some progress in the internationally high-profile lawsuit by Leeuwarden lawyer Arno van Kessel https://deanderekrant.nl/nieuw-hoofdstuk-in-rechtszaak-tegen-bill-gates-en-mark-rutte/ and his Eindhoven colleague Peter Stassen. In 2023, the legal duo announced they would file legal proceedings against Bill Gates, Mark Rutte, and the Dutch State, among others. On behalf of their clients, they want to force the judge to issue a clear ruling on the question: was the COVID-19 mRNA injection a vaccine for the benefit of the population’s health, or a bioweapon? Van Kessel said: “It’s one or the other, and there’s no in between.”

The Northern Netherlands District Court, Leeuwarden location, announced in early June 2025 – finally – that the first substantive hearing of the case is scheduled for July 9th. On Wednesday morning, June 11th, there was a completely unexpected turn of events. Arno van Kessel was dragged from his bed early in the morning by a special intervention team with a considerable display of force. The lawyer, his daughter, and his wife were even briefly held at gunpoint.

A day later, the police published a report on the website politie.nl linking Van Kessel to “a criminal network.” According to a press release issued by the Public Prosecution Service, eight people were arrested that morning for “adhering to anti-institutional ideology and possibly intending to use violence.” One of them was quickly released, while the other seven were held in restricted custody for two weeks, meaning the suspects were not allowed any contact with the outside world. Van Kessel – as was announced last week – was being held in a cell in Vught.

In recent weeks, several stories have appeared in the mainstream media about a network of so-called sovereigns. These “anti-institutionalists” may have been planning something related to the NATO summit. Weapons and explosives may have been found, but any hard evidence or substantiation remains lacking to this day. The suggestion that Van Kessel is also part of a dangerous criminal group has been raised. The charges have since been partially withdrawn. The AD newspaper reported last week that the Public Prosecution Service has been unable to substantiate a plan to disrupt the NATO summit. “We have investigated whether there is an imminent threat. This has not been proven.”

On Thursday, June 26, the Public Prosecution Service released more news after a long silence. One suspect has been released, but “six suspects in the investigation into a criminal network, in which a large proportion of the arrested suspects espouse anti-institutional ideology and may have the intention to use violence, will remain in custody for an additional 90 days,” the Public Prosecution Service announced. Van Kessel is one of those suspects who will remain in custody for another 90 days. The Public Prosecution Service states that it needs more time for the investigation and that “given the state of the investigation, it is not possible to respond substantively to questions about the progress, suspicions, and findings,” according to the Public Prosecution Service.

It’s remarkable that the mainstream media continues to use the “sovereign” frame. This is despite the fact that it was already clear in the first days after the arrest that Van Kessel is not a sovereign. As a lawyer, he is following the institutional path with his case. Van Kessel is also not known for being violent. He openly and unashamedly proclaims his faith in Jesus Christ everywhere, which implies that he opposes violence. The media writes nothing about this. They also ignore the story of Van Kessel’s partner (see box).

Peter Stassen – who is temporarily acting as head of Van Kessel’s law firm – told De Andere Krant that he, too, has not had any contact with his partner since June 11th. According to Stassen, restraining a suspect is one of the most severe measures the Public Prosecution Service has at its disposal, “so they have to produce very strong evidence.” So far, he has seen nothing. The Public Prosecution Service told this newspaper that “the Public Prosecution Service realizes that this is a very serious instrument and should not be used lightly,” but declined to comment further on the case.

The Eindhoven lawyer has since received word from the chairman of the Dutch Bar Association, the body responsible for overseeing the legal profession, that suspension proceedings have been initiated against Van Kessel. One way or another, it is therefore certain that Van Kessel will not be present on July 9th. Stassen did, however, make it very clear that despite his inadequate preparation, he “will be fully equipped.”

Stassen will also give a lecture in Groningen on July 1st about the latest developments. “It will go ahead as planned. I will explain a great deal in it, including addressing the State’s defense, in which they very clearly make personal attacks on the experts we want to speak,” says Stassen. More information about this can be found at Rechtoprecht.online.

Many suspect that attorney Van Kessel has gotten too close to the truth in the coronavirus case. This has led to the case being associated with the prosecution of German lawyer Reiner Fuellmich. We will discuss the case in more detail in the next edition of De Andere Krant.

The case strikes me as another example of how Globalist gangsters no longer even try to conceal that they have gone Full Fascist. Arresting a plaintiffs attorney in a late night raid of his home and detaining him for months on vague accusations of “espousing an anti-institutional ideology” is so crassly totalitarian as to be almost beyond belief.

Not surprisingly, the hopelessly fallen New York Times hasn’t reported van Kessel’s arrest. Once widely regarded as the thoroughbred of U.S. news reporting, the Times now resembles an old, swayback donkey covered with manure. The English language is insufficient for me to express the depth of my contempt for that useless rag, unworthy of being used as ersatz toilette paper in a subway station public restroom.

The German press is no better. A Google Germany search for niederländischer Anwalt Arno van Kessel verhaftet (“Netherlands attorney Arno van Kessel arrested”) yielded not a single report from a single major German newspaper. How is this possible?

I thought I’d grown accustomed to being presented with evidence that a cabal of globalists and their puppets—such as former Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, who is now Secretary General of NATO—run the world, but it occurs to me this morning that this story beats them all. Please forward this critically important report to your friends.

[…]

Via https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/lawyer-suing-gates-and-bourla-for?r=83qir

World War II Lies of the West Part 1

Operation Barbarossa in Rare Pictures, 1941 - Rare Historical Photos

World War II Lies of the West Part 1

Directed by Tatiana Borsh

Film Review

https://en.rtdoc.tv/films/2001-world-war-ii-lies-of-the-west-part-1

This is Part 1 of a two part series documenting efforts by the West to erase the crucial role of the Soviet Union in defeating Hitler’s Third Reich during World War II.

  • Lie #1 – The Soviet refused to come to the aid of Czechoslovakia when Hitler was threatening to invade.

In reality, the Soviets were the only Allied country to oppose Hitler’s invasion of Czechoslovakia. Not only did France and England fail to come to Czechoslovakia’s defense, but they gave her an ultimatum not to resist the Nazi invasion.* With far more tanks than Hitler and the best weapons in Europe, the Czechs could easily have defeated the Germans. It was largely the acquisition of Czech tanks that allowed Hitler to roll over Europe in a matter of months.

The USSR (which had to traverse Poland to reach Czechoslovakia) sent troops to the Polish border but Poland refused to grant them safe passage. In fact Poland sought to dissolve Czechoslovakia and split the country between Germany, Poland and Hungary. Following Hitler’s invasion of Czechoslovakia’s Sudetenland, Poland invaded Silesia in northeastern Czechoslovakia, while Hungary invaded eastern Czechoslovakia.

  • Lie #2 The USSR defeated Nazi Germany by sacrificing massive numbers of Soviet conscripts as canon fodder.

The West typical credits the Soviets with 27 million dead during World War II. However this number includes nearly 19 million civilian killed by Nazi atrocities. Only 44% of Soviet POWs returned from captivity (the majority were killed while interned).** This contrasts with 865 German, Hungarian and Croatian Nazis repatriated by the Soviets.

According to Russian figures, 7.8 million Nazi troops were killed from war wounds, disease and accidents, compared to 8.7 million Soviet troops.

  • Lie #3 The Soviets played a secondary role to the other Allied powers in defeating Germany.

The Soviets fought Hitler and his European allies virtually by themselves from the Nazi invasion in ntil the US-UK landing in Normandy in June 1944. Meanwhile many major US companies continued to provide money and oil to the Nazi regime, as both the US and Britain refused to bomb their German subsidiaries. Every third soldier in the assault on the Soviet Union was non-German. Officially Italy, Slovakia, Hungary and Finland declared war on the USSR at the same time as Germany. Unofficially Norway, Denmark and Switzerland also participated in the attack on the USSR, while the Netherlands and Denmark participated in SS missions and Lithuania, Ukraine, Estonia, Czechoslovakia Vichy France (320,000 French joined the Nazi armed forces) and Poland supplied troops.

Despite an agreement the US and UK made to open a second front against the Germans in 1942, they waited until it became clear that the Soviets were 180 miles from Berlin (and about to defeat the Germans by themselves), eleven months before the official German defeat in May 1945.

  • Lie #4 The Soviets killed and raped civilians

This was propaganda disseminated by Hitler’s minister of propaganda Joseph Goebbels and mindlessly taken up by Western propagandists. On January 19, 1945, Stalin issued a special order that all Russians guilty of civilian violence or rape. According to Russian veterans interviewed in the film, this was rigorously enforced.


*In March 1939, the Bank of England transferred the Czech government’s gold to the Nazi Reichsbank. See The Bank of England Hands Over Czech Gold to the Nazis. Both the governor and the chairman of the BOE were part of a powerful coalition of British fascists (which included the future king Edward VII, Neville Chamberlain, Lloyd George and Churchill’s brother-in-law Oswald Moseley) who envisioned Britain and Germany as co-leaders of a fascist world government.

** Nazi authorities treated American, British and French POWs far better than Soviet POWs.

Weapons Meant for Ukraine End up with Drug Dealers in Rio De Janeiro’s Favelas

Ukraine has become a source of weapons and mercenaries for global organized crime.

Since the beginning of Russia’s special military operation in Ukraine, one of the main questions raised by analysts has been the risk of weapons sent by the West to the Kiev regime spreading among criminal and terrorist organizations around the world. This has already happened many times, considering that there are reports of such weapons being found in several countries, mainly in the African Sahel. However, recent news suggests the situation may be even more serious: Ukrainian weapons have already reached Brazilian cities.

On July 17, the Brazilian Military Police carried out an operation in the Acari neighborhood, a suburb in the northern region of Rio de Janeiro state. The operation targeted an illegal copper deposit, a common occurrence in Rio de Janeiro’s “favelas” (low-income communities often dominated by organized crime). However, officers also found some weapons used by local drug traffickers there, including a foreign-made anti-drone device.

Initially, the news was reported as a common police seizure. However, footage shared by the officers revealed that the captured anti-drone weapon was identified with the “tryzub”—the coat of arms of Ukraine. After posts on social media questioning about this issue, the military police intelligence department confirmed that the anti-drone interceptor was indeed from Ukraine—the first reported case of Ukrainian weapons found in Brazil since the beginning of the conflict.

There is still no information on whether the interceptor found in Rio is Ukrainian-made or a Western weapon sent by NATO in military aid packages to the Kiev regime. Despite the presence of the Ukrainian symbol, the weapon’s identification was written in English, suggesting it is Western-made equipment. What is known is that the equipment has a range of up to 7,000 meters, creating a safe zone for criminals in Rio’s favelas against drones used by the police.

In Brazil, police are not authorized to use combat drones during military operations in the favelas. However, reconnaissance drones are already being legally operated. The use of this type of interceptor severely reduces the range of police drones, hindering the success of operations. This can have a high human cost for Brazilian police officers, who, without obtaining intelligence data from their drones, are vulnerable to ambushes by criminals during maneuvers in the favelas.

Despite its tourist appeal, Rio de Janeiro has suffered from a serious public safety problem for decades. Around 60% of the city’s territory is controlled by organized crime. More than 4.4 million people live in these areas, where the Brazilian government has no control. The city’s territories are disputed primarily by the drug trafficking factions Comando Vermelho (CV) and Terceiro Comando Puro (TCP), as well as the so-called “militias,” which are small, independent criminal groups formed by former members of the main factions or corrupt police and military personnel.

The Acari favela, where the Ukrainian equipment was found, is controlled by the TCP faction. Interestingly, last year, this same criminal organization was reported as the first drug trafficking faction in Brazil to use drones in combat situations. The incident occurred near the so-called “Israel Complex”, a group of TCP-controlled favelas with a Christian evangelical majority also in the northern zone of Rio. At the time, drug dealers used a modified version of ordinary civilian drones, enabling them to launch grenades and causing damage to CV-affiliated rival criminals.

This news comes amid a broad process of professionalization of organized crime in Brazil. Currently, criminal factions are investing in hiring armed forces veterans and international mercenaries to improve their combat capabilities. The current conflict in Ukraine plays a central role in this process, as many young Brazilian ex-military personnel are enlisting as mercenaries for the Kiev regime. Those who survive the intense combat return to Brazil and are often hired by organized crime.

This is not an accidental move. Brazilian judge Alexandre Abraão Dias Teixeira recently stated during a public security conference that Brazil’s police already have data showing that criminal factions are encouraging their members and prospects to go fight in Ukraine to receive advanced military training and gain real combat experience. The judge predicts that in the near future, Brazil will face even more serious security problems due to this process—not only in Rio, but also in other states, since Rio’s factions also operate in other parts of Brazil.

“The police have already identified members of Brazilian organized crime who are in Ukraine, engaged there to learn. So, we’re going to face very serious problems here,” he said.

As analysts have long warned, Western weapons sent to Ukraine are constantly diverted to the global black market. This is to be expected, considering that Ukraine is recognized as the most corrupt country in Europe, with a real gangster culture among its state officials. The weapons received are often sold by corrupt Ukrainian military personnel to criminal buyers in other countries—often even to terrorist organizations. The fact that these weapons have already reached Brazil shows that the scope of Ukrainian corruption is truly extensive and that Western military aid packages pose a danger to all countries.

Brazil must take action in this situation, demanding answers from Kiev and its partners. Measures must also be taken to prevent Brazilians from becoming mercenaries in Ukraine, as well as to monitor the arrival of illegal military equipment into the country. However, the primary responsibility lies with Western-biased international organizations, which continue refusing to condemn the West’s illegal measures of unrestricted military support for Ukraine.

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/weapons-meant-ukraine-drug-dealers-rio-de-janeiro/5895913

Denmark Fighting AI by Giving Citizens Copyright of Their Own Faces

denmark-is-fighting-ai-by-giving-citizens-copyright-to-their-own-faces

Moor Studio/Getty Images

By

Your image, your voice, and your essence as a human being could be gobbled up and regurgitated by AI. The clock is ticking on when you’re control over your image and representation is completely out of your hands.

To tip the scales back in favor of those who wish to remain in firm control of their image, Denmark has put forth a proposal that would give every one of its citizens the legal ground to go after someone who uses their image without their consent.

This specifically covers deepfakes, those videos of a person’s face or body that have been digitally altered so they appear to be someone else.

The Scandinavian nation has put forth a proposal to amend its copyright laws so that everyone owns the rights to their own face, their own voice, and their body. Current laws aren’t quite up to snuff when it comes to protecting people from having their likenesses twisted and contorted.

Danish Culture Minister Jakob Engel-Schmidt is taking a stand for all of those whose likeness has been callously tossed into images and videos without their consent. “Human beings can be run through the digital copy machine and be misused for all sorts of purposes, and I’m not willing to accept that,” he told The Guardian.

The proposed legislation defines a deepfake as a realistic digital representation of a person, including their appearance and voice. Under this new law, anyone in Denmark will be able to demand the removal of such content if it was shared without consent, including digitally recreated performances of artists.

Compensation may be on the table for those affected. Satire and parody, however, get a free pass, though it’s easy to imagine a future where this is a loophole that some will attempt to exploit.

The bill has massive political support, with nine out of ten MPs backing it. It’s poised to hit parliament in the fall after a consultation period. If tech platforms don’t fall in line, Denmark is ready to slap some massive fines on them and escalate the matter to the European Commission.

Engel-Schmidt hopes other European countries will follow suit.

[…]

Via https://www.vice.com/en/article/denmark-is-fighting-ai-by-giving-citizens-copyright-to-their-own-faces/

The Real Epstein List and What It Really Means

Flight logs? Selfies with celebrities? That’s not proof, it’s mind candy for lazy fools. Prosecutions in court, that’s proof. Not going on? Oh yes it is!

You wanna see who’s on the real, proven in court, Epstein Client List? It’s no big secret.

These names are on the list because these people were identified in court by name in sworn testimony under oath and the records of their guilt are publicly available. All you gotta do is look them up. You just have to know that they exist.

Flight logs? How many hundreds of self-important, too-rich-for-their-own-good fools went to Jeffrey Epstein’s Little St James Pedo Island? They are not all pedophiles. Shouldn’t that be obvious? That flight log is packed with everybody and his dog and cat so that the very idea of pedophilia and child sex trafficking looks ridiculous.

Selfies taken with celebrities? Come on! Epstein and Maxwell were celebrity butterflies in New York, London, Washington and L.A. for twenty years. Ghislaine Maxwell spoke before the United Nations nine times in the 1990s. Celebrities smile for selfies. They are not exactly geniuses. That’s not proof.

But the proof does exist and it’s public.

Larry C. Johnson on Sonar 21, 9 July 2025: The Epstein Client List — Why is Trump Breaking His Promise to Publish? https://sonar21.com/the-epstein-client-list-why-is-trump-breaking-his-promise-to-publish/

“Although Donald Trump and Pam Bondi insist that there is no Epstein Client List… there is a list and it is reproduced above with the permission of its author, Ryan Dawson. Ryan compiled the list the old-fashioned way… he combed through court transcripts and charging documents. He only put names on the list if the victims of Epstein’s pedophilia enterprise identified or named a particular individual. As you peruse the list you will notice that there are some very wealthy, powerful individuals named. Not one of them has brought a libel or slander legal action against Ryan. If he was posting false material, he would have been a certain target of lawsuits…

“So why has Donald Trump broken his promise to publish the list? I think there are two reasons — neither mutually exclusive. First, Donald Trump probably paid no attention to Ryan’s work and was never familiar with the list. Once he signed the Executive Order to publish the Epstein file, he was then briefed on the actual names and realized that many of them are major donors to his campaign, e.g., Jamie Dimon, Robert Kraft. While there are several names on that list who are confirmed anti-Trumpers, there are others who are friends.

“Second, and in my opinion a more important consideration, is that the full Epstein file would expose a foreign intelligence blackmail operation that would implicates the Mossad and the CIA. Alexander Acosta, the former Secretary of Labor for Donald Trump, said he was told that Jeffrey Epstein had ties to intelligence. During the controversy surrounding his handling of Epstein’s 2008 plea deal as a U.S. attorney, Acosta reportedly told Trump administration officials that he had been informed Epstein “belonged to intelligence,” and that this was a reason for the unusually lenient plea agreement. It would not surprise me that Bibi Netanyahu asked Trump to pull the plug on releasing the material. Did Trump get something in return from Bibi, such as agreeing to a ceasefire? We will find out in the coming days.

“While Trump may think he can smooth this over with his MAGA base, I think he has done serious damage to his Presidency by embracing the lie that, ‘there is no list.’ ”

I urge everyone to view this article and the videos included. Mr Ryan Dawson is an exciting new discovery for me.

Firstly, Ryan assembled his list by doing the plodding dog work of going trough the transcripts of the civil and criminal legal proceedings which resulted in these most powerful elite billionaires and even leaders of nations being convicted in courts of law and paying billions of dollars in compensation to keep their depravity under the public radar. There’s no big secret here. No big REVEAL waiting in the wings. It’s all being done in court, under oath, in publicly available transcripts and records. All you have to do is look it up. And anybody can do it.

This in itself drives Ryan’s main point, that we, the global public, are being persuaded that the law is dead and the rich and powerful are getting away with worse than murder. That is not the case.

We out here in the internet are persuaded, in propaganda so subtle and carefully designed that we can scarcely even keep foremost in mind, to think that these criminals are getting away with their depravity. That’s a lie! They are landing in courts and getting so securely convicted that they dare not wage further perverted and frivolous lawsuits (such as suing Ryan Dawson into bankruptcy and prison, for one small instance). Why don’t people including Tony Blair and Bill Gates crush Ryan like a bug? Because trying to do that would only create another legal opera that would expose their evil even more spectacularly.

And that’s where the evil elites are concentrating their warfare on truth and justice. Keeping Ryan obscure by stomping on internet platforms. Ryan has not been physically destroyed like Julian Assange was. Did we not notice? The persecution of Assange only spotlighted the injustice. Those who tried to kill him by perverting American and British law only brought more attention to themselves. That’s the opposite of what they need to do. I think the secret councils of oligarchs who run the WEF and World Bank and City of London decided to step on those of their allies who were obsessed with destroying Assange and compelled them to surrender and stop embarrassing the global establishment.

And, yes, I believe such conferences exist. Those who rule the global institutions and corporations would love us lowly peasants to think multibillionaires and aristocrats are gods. They aren’t, they are real individuals who coffee-up every morning along with the rest of humanity.

The smarter way for these arrogant people to go is what they are doing to Ryan Dawson (and he’s far from the only one, I’d bet). Every time he tries to get some exposure on the major platforms like YouTube they squash the platform. Why don’t they just kill him?

There’s an interesting question. I’ll have to guess the answer, outsider and non-lawyer that I am. My guess is that killing Ryan would be likely to backfire.

Ryan is not working with any secret inside info that can be squashed by killing him. Everything he exposes is legal, public information that anybody can access by just doing the easy but boring dog-work of combing through publicly available transcripts. It’s all an open record on the Cloud. It’s indestructible on the global internet.

Dinesh D’Souza well established that the internet and Google were created by British-American and Israeli covert military intelligence beginning as far back as the 1950s. Home computers were marketed to the masses beginning in the 1980s. I’d be pretty sure that the “Intelligence Community” got excited about the prospect of popularizing a way to mind-control public opinion. They sold the idea to the global financial and commercial aristocrats of the Atlanticist “West” and the arrogant mavins of the “Free World” eagerly signed on to criminalizing global commerce. The 1990s were the high water mark of Western “Oligarchs” and Economic Hit Men. They were eager to believe themselves to be untouchable geniuses, jolly pirates who could never be caught and hanged.

Thus the masters and their “Intelligence” mercenaries fell victim to the temptation of the fictional Dr Frankenstein. The creators of the internet have made a monster that they cannot control. As artificial Intelligence advances with the unstoppable logic of what Karl Marx called “Capitalism”, the internet becomes more and more uncontrollable and so does the public opinion that smart guys such as Gates and Zuckerberg thought they could play with and not get burned.

By the way, Bill Gates is on that list. Just thought I’d mention it.

Ryan Dawson has seen some stuff that came out in court which describes crimes against children “worse than sex trafficking … bestiality and sick stuff…” Maybe horror movie fans can imagine some of this. Not my taste.

I can tell you that some of it came out quite recently in sworn testimony, public testimony under oath and threat of perjury, in the Israeli Knesset. Men and women who dress in the costumes and profess the religion of Orthodox Judaism are publicly convicted of child sexual abuse and torture of children in Israel and beyond Israel with their criminal connections within the global Diaspora.

[…]

Via https://jshepard.substack.com/p/the-real-epstein-list-and-what-it