I wasn’t planning to write again (yet) about Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the migrant deported by the Trump administration to El Salvador despite an order protecting him from being sent there, but I continue to be frustrated by politicians from both parties (and their associated media outlets) telling only half the story and skewing the facts in one direction or the other.

[…]

Many liberals would have you believe that Abrego Garcia was a “Maryland man” who was living in the U.S. legally. Many conservatives would have you believe that he was a convicted member of MS-13. And both sides would tell you that the Supreme Court sided unanimously with them. All of those statements are exaggerations: they stem from some true fact, but don’t tell you the full story.

[…]

It seems to me that many people are opining on this case without reading the relevant court documents and filings. But I have. So here follows 25 facts about Kilmar Abrego Garcia:

1. Kilmar Abrego Garcia entered the United States illegally in around 2011 (according to his lawyers) or 2012 (according to a police report). He would have been around 16 years old. He has previously acknowledged crossing the border illegally, and his lawyers do not dispute it now.
2. In March 2019, Abrego Garcia was arrested in a Home Depot parking lot along with three other men, one of whom police officers said they recognized as an active MS-13 gang member with an “extensive criminal history.” Abrego Garcia’s lawyers say he was at the Home Depot to “solicit employment” and that he recognized two of the other men “from prior occasions at the Home Depot” but had “never interacted with them in any other context.” The lawyers say he was chatting with the other men “to pass the time.”
3. According to the police report, when an officer approached the four men, “two of the individuals reached into their waistbands and discarded several unknown items under a parked vehicle.” The report says that “two small plastic bottles containing marijuana was [sic] located on scene.”
4. The police officers observed that Abrego Garcia was wearing a Chicago Bulls hat, which has long been described as the “hat of choice” for MS-13 members. (The logo resembles the “devil horns” hand sign often used by the gang.) He was also wearing a “hoodie with rolls of money covering the eyes, ears and mouth of the presidents on the separate denominations,” which the officers believed to be associated with the MS-13 motto “ver, oir y callar,” or “see no evil, hear no evil and say no evil.”1
5. A confidential informant told the police officers that Abrego Garcia was an active member of MS-13 in the “Western” clique. (Abrego Garcia’s lawyers note that that clique is based in New York, where he has never lived.) The informant, a “past proven and reliable source of information,” said that Abrego Garcia held the rank of “Chequeo” in MS-13 and the moniker “Chele.” An informant also said that another of the four men was an MS-13 member (in addition to the one that officers already knew to be a gang member). No gang affiliation was determined for the fourth man, although the officers noted that “MS-13 gang members are only allowed to hang around other members or prospects for the gang.” The fourth man was released.
6. Abrego Garcia and the two other men believed by police to be MS-13 members were kept overnight in a local jail and then transported to an ICE field office the next day. There, Abrego Garcia denied being an MS-13 member but “freely admitted” to being an El Salvador citizen “present in the United States illegally,” without documents that would allow him to remain here, according to an official form. A deportation officer administratively charged him as an “alien present without admission or parole” under the Immigration and Nationality Act, a deportable offense. The form describes Abrego Garcia as having a “gang affiliation” but “no criminal history.”
7. The police report contained some internal inconsistencies, and his lawyers later sought to speak to the detective who wrote it, but were told he had been suspended. According to the New Republic, the detective had been suspended for giving confidential information about a case to a sex worker. The detective was indicted for the offense and pleaded guilty.
8. Abrego Garcia was kept in custody by ICE. He requested bond, but an immigration judge declined to release him, reasoning in April 2019 that he failed to prove that he “would not pose a danger to others, as the evidence shows that he is a verified member of MS-13.”2 The judge was “reluctant to give evidentiary weight” to his clothing, but appeared swayed by the confidential informant. The judge also noted that Abrego Garcia had failed to appear at hearings for traffic violations in the past (he said he was unaware of the hearings, but acknowledged failing to follow up on the citations). His “lack of diligence in following up on his traffic court cases indicates that he cannot be trusted to appear in immigration court” if released, the judge said.
9. Abrego Garcia appealed the denial of his bond request, but the Board of Immigration Appeals upheld the immigration judge’s ruling in December 2019, saying that the judge “appropriately considered allegations of gang affiliation.”
10. Abrego Garcia married Jennifer Vasquez Sura, a U.S. citizen who was then pregnant with his child, while in custody. (In deeming him a potential flight risk, the immigration judge had noted the fact that he was only engaged to Vasquez Sura, and that “any immigration relief that he can be expected to gain from a marital relationship with her in the future is speculative.”)
11. About seven months before Abrego Garcia’s arrest, in August 2018, the father of two of Vasquez Sura’s children had filed a court document (obtained by ABC News) that said he feared for their children’s lives, in part, because Vasquez Sura was “dating a gang member.” The man did not identify who he was referring to. According to Abrego Garcia’s lawyers, Abrego Garcia met Vasquez Sura around 2016 and they “eventually became romantically involved” thereafter. They moved in together around December 2018, at which point she was already pregnant with their child.
12. After his June 2019 marriage, Abrego Garcia filed for relief from deportation under three authorities: asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Abrego Garcia explained that he had reason to fear being deported back to El Salvador because the Barrio 18 gang had threatened to kill him and his family because of their pupusa business.
13. At subsequent hearings in August and September 2019, an immigration judge agreed that he was deportable as charged (which Abrego Garcia also acknowledged) but then considered his three requests for relief. The judge denied the asylum request, because it could only be filed within a year after arriving in the U.S., a deadline which had long passed. He also denied the CAT request as lacking evidence.
14. But the judge granted Abrego Garcia’s request for withholding of removal, finding a “clear probability” that he would be persecuted in El Salvador. Withholding of removal is a sort of limbo status. It guarantees that the recipient cannot be deported to a specific country (in this case, El Salvador). But there is “no legal impediment” to the government deporting the recipient anywhere else at any time, as Abrego Garcia’s lawyers have acknowledged.3
15. But, to do so, the U.S. would have to find a third country willing to take the deportee. So, most recipients remain in the U.S. (According to the American Immigration Council, in 2017, just 1.6% of people granted withholding of removal were deported to a third country.) Therefore, Abrego Garcia continued to live in the U.S. He checked in with ICE every year as required. At any time in this period, ICE could have deported him to a third country (provided that they find one that would take him), but they did not.
16. It was during this period, in 2021, that Vasquez Sura (Abrego Garcia’s wife) requested a protective order against him, according to documents obtained by ABC News. She alleged that he had “punched and scratched her eye,” causing her to bleed; “ripped [her] shorts and shirt off”; and grabbed her by the arm when she tried to run away, leaving a bruise. She also alleged that he had previously hit her with a boot and in the eye. “At this point I am afraid to be close to him,” she wrote. The protective order was dismissed because Vasquez Sura failed to appear in court. She now says that “we were able to work through this situation privately as a family, including by going to counseling.”
17. In 2022, according to NewsNation, Abrego Garcia was stopped by the Tennessee Highway Patrol for “illegally transporting eight immigrants from Houston to Maryland.” He was not arrested or charged.
18. Abrego Garcia was driving in March 2025 when he was pulled over by ICE officers who told him, according to his lawyers, that his “status has changed.” (It is unknown exactly why, although President Trump had recently deemed MS-13 a “foreign terrorist organization” and expressed interest in deporting MS-13 members. Abrego Garcia would presumably have shown up in the ICE database as a deportable immigrant with alleged MS-13 ties.) He was then detained.
19. His lawyers say that he was moved several times but told he would go before an immigration judge. He didn’t, and was instead deported to El Salvador to be detained at the notorious CECOT prison along with other alleged gang members. Abrego Garcia was deported under Title 8 of the U.S. Code (not the Alien Enemies Act, which was used only for alleged members of a different gang).
20. Abrego Garcia’s attorneys filed a lawsuit seeking his return. An ICE official acknowledged that his deportation to El Salvador was an “administrative error,” but said it was “carried out in good faith based on the existence of a final order of removal and Abrego Garcia’s purported membership in MS-13.”4 The government argued that the error could not be reversed since Abrego Garcia was no longer in U.S. custody and was now in the custody of his home country.
21. U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis sided with Abrego Garcia, ordering the government on April 4 to “facilitate and effectuate” his return by the end of the day on April 7. An appeals court upheld her order, which Chief Justice John Roberts then paused before the deadline.
22. On April 10, the full Supreme Court vacated the deadline in Xinis’ order — since it had already passed — and said the rest of the order “remains in effect but requires clarification.” The justices said that Xinis was correct to order the government to “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s return and to “ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador.” The unsigned order also told Xinis to clarify what she meant by “effectuate,” and to do so in a manner that gives “due regard for the deference owed to the Executive Branch in the conduct of foreign affairs.”5
23. Hours later, Xinis issued an amended order directing the government to “take all available steps” to facilitate Abrego Garcia’s return “as soon as possible.” (She did not list any specific steps, set a new deadline, or mention the word “effectuate.”) The Supreme Court had also instructed the Trump administration to “be prepared to share what it can concerning the steps it has taken and the prospect of further steps.” To that end, Xinis directed the government to answer three questions — where Abrego Garcia is, what steps they had taken to facilitate his return, and what steps they planned to take next — by the next morning.
24. The administration responded that they were “unable to provide the information requested by the Court” in such a short timeframe.

[…]

Via https://www.wakeuptopolitics.com/p/25-facts-about-kilmar-abrego-garcia